SBSP...sounds excellent.. Even well respected geo-political analysts mention this innovative idea.
Of course, the fact that petroleum is still the most diverse natural resource on the planet, will slow down the utilization of SBSP.
Not only this, but the planet's petroleum must be used up before SBSP can be implemented. In other words, the U.S (and U.K.) are not going to embrace this technology until they know they can control it, and every other country's use of it..
Thanks for your comment Z0rr0rr0r, as per the presentation, costings for a 1GW system are currently approx. $16B making it on a par with Nuclear when full costs accounting is used. One must also remember that for the last 50 years we have been sending up satellites into space, powered by solar panels that broadcast radio waves to earth. Nothing queer about that.
We've proven this back at the end of the Reagan Days and proposed the whole system in the 80's @ GDSS (San Diego) then transmit it down to our superconductive energy storage rings for output. Boeing now has the most efficient methods to do this NOW.
Thank you for your question. The answer is no, as the satellite is in a Geo-Synchronous orbit, it remains outside of the Earth's shadow and therefore in constant sunlight. The only time it will be in shadow is for a few minutes a year during the summer and winter equinox. This equates to less down-time than a traditional plant on the ground with regards to maintenance etc.
yeah bill gates and all the usual suspectsshoudl get their wallets out and do something worthwhile instead of sitting on all that money. i know bill invests millions into aids research but he may as well support this too
I dont buy that we cant develop and implement this in an effective way if we actually put a real effort into it.
josh1492 4 months ago
SBSP...sounds excellent.. Even well respected geo-political analysts mention this innovative idea.
Of course, the fact that petroleum is still the most diverse natural resource on the planet, will slow down the utilization of SBSP.
Not only this, but the planet's petroleum must be used up before SBSP can be implemented. In other words, the U.S (and U.K.) are not going to embrace this technology until they know they can control it, and every other country's use of it..
($ and Power).
rkg62976 7 months ago
Thanks for your comment Z0rr0rr0r, as per the presentation, costings for a 1GW system are currently approx. $16B making it on a par with Nuclear when full costs accounting is used. One must also remember that for the last 50 years we have been sending up satellites into space, powered by solar panels that broadcast radio waves to earth. Nothing queer about that.
spaceenergysbsp 9 months ago
How much does it cost to send in space a 1GW system? It seems to me a quite queer idea to launch satellites with solar panels in space.
z0rr0rr0r 9 months ago
We've proven this back at the end of the Reagan Days and proposed the whole system in the 80's @ GDSS (San Diego) then transmit it down to our superconductive energy storage rings for output. Boeing now has the most efficient methods to do this NOW.
spboike 11 months ago
I believe that he should not have the right to sell the energy of the Sun to us, the Sun belongs to all of us, why not sell the sea salt water?
The Zeitgeist Movement and the Venus Project.
PerivaleBuses 1 year ago
@PerivaleBuses i agree, but i also see the current nature of man, and the only way anything ever gets done is if someone can make money off it
revolt81 11 months ago
Oh come on this is the only plan to save the planet, and nobody is watching it or even commenting?!?
moonus111 1 year ago
I do not understand how it could be 24/7. As the earth turns won't there be any time that the earth is blocking it causing down time?
23104565 2 years ago
Thank you for your question. The answer is no, as the satellite is in a Geo-Synchronous orbit, it remains outside of the Earth's shadow and therefore in constant sunlight. The only time it will be in shadow is for a few minutes a year during the summer and winter equinox. This equates to less down-time than a traditional plant on the ground with regards to maintenance etc.
spaceenergysbsp 1 year ago 5
How maintenances actually be done? Also is space junk going to be a big concern in damaging the satellite?
23104565 1 year ago
Very interesting. In the future, it *will* be a reality. What it needs is a rich philanthropist to make it happen in 10 years rather than 50 !
slowdating 2 years ago
yeah bill gates and all the usual suspectsshoudl get their wallets out and do something worthwhile instead of sitting on all that money. i know bill invests millions into aids research but he may as well support this too
jonnycoyle 2 years ago