man anybody who took history knows british didn't leave india because of any violent resistance. there was revolutions, sepoy mutiny, anglo sikh war, but they were all destroyed by the british
british people left india on their own
and aren't south indians hindu's? atleast they are the only ones i seen that seem to be agressive, and their kalari martial art looks stronger then gatka by far, they actually look like they know how to use weapons, not like these gatka people
You think there was nothing in Indian situation at that time which made it necessary for the British to leave India in a hurry. Why then did they do so? In reply Attlee cited several reasons, the most important of which were the INA activities of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, which weakened the very foundation of the British Empire in India, and the RIN Mutiny which made the British realise that the Indian armed forces could no longer be trusted to prop up the British.
BTW.....i havnt come up with this reason....it was the british prime minister who was citing reasons to the british parliament for leaving in a hurry.....after all, the brits did leave in such a hurry tht they gave jus 6 months notice to many british-indian residents to relocate....they didnt want an embarrassment....they left the country in a mess...
subash chandra bose never got imprisoned....ur history is so wrong.....he died in a plane crash when he was leaving Japan....
'looks stronger'.....are u for real...?? the brits banned gatka during the 19th century coz they considered it a big threat......
the sepoy mutiny and anglo-sikh wars were not fought by the british.....they were fought by indians against indians.....the bengal and bombay regiments fought against punjab in anglo-sikh wars.....the sikhs and punjabis fought against sepoy rebels in 1857......british just financed these....im tellin u...we were conquered bcoz we were devided...
kalari was banned in the south too, they didn't want anything that could lead to a strong sense of indian identity
look at some of the kalari video's, i can show you some good ones.
they actually practice techniques, they don't just flail the weapons around, i watch gatka fights, and you see the guys are not even doing anything, only jumping around swinging the sword and not touching each other.
these guys actually block and defend, but again their hand fighting techniques look weak
'look weak'.....wtf is the matter with u......tell me this....if the chinese had such superior martial arts, y were major parts of their territories conquered first by mongols.....then by muslim turks.....if white ppl were so mighty...why did arabs rule spain for 800 years...??...now dnt say arabs are better than south asians coz history has it tht afghans have defeated persians and sikhs have defeated afghans....
south indians are declared weaklings......the british wudnt recruit from south india because they considered those ppl fit for only 'sedentary work'.....there was no reason for british to favor the punjabis.....
btw......hand fighting styles are useless in real life.....when they demonstrate, its more like a dance which is perfectly choreographed....if ur up against a street fightin guy.....no way can karate have ne advantage....if it had...chinese wudve ruled the planet...!
lol, again you twist up facts for your liking, i don't know how you can call south indians weak, when nayars are a martial race, south indians are the only indians that conquered foreign countries, and if you look at any foreign cities that contain both populations, punjabi gangs are regarded as weak jokes, while tamil gangs actually contribute to the murder rate, again, not very important, but just goes to show you can't consider southerners weak, when they're stronger than you
Ok.....here ill give u another proof....the british entered india at approximately middle india.....in bengal in 1757.....tamil nadu is the southern most part and punjab is the northern most part....tamil nadu was one of the first states to be conquered despite having the most brilliant muslim king (who was not tamil) and who was the first ever to use missile warfare.....
punjab on the other hand was the last to be conquered and the british merely stayed at punjab borders for 40 years (after delhi was captured) and waited for the strong king Ranjit Singh to die so that they could start their 'games' (sons of ranjit singh were assasinated....4 kings changed in 3 years)......despite this....it was punjab which attacked british empire....and later it was a 12 year old king (last son) who surrendered....
listen up.....I am tired of giving evidence to an illogical fool....i bet u havnt attended school.....cause when i ask u for evidence to support ur point, u say....'tamils LOOK strong'......heres wat i have to say....My dik can defeat a tamil cause it LOOKS stronger.....
if u want to talk of crime rates....give statistics...cause i keep beating hindus and small chinese (who arent even a challenge) around.....i dnt even kno wat ur talkin bout
are u one of those tamils sufferin from an inferiority complex...?? punjabis conquered both afghanistan and tibet....so we conquered foreign lands as well....
i cant take u seriously.....give me a webpage which says punjabi gangs are weak....coz u talk like a joker..
hahahahaha.....if southerners were strong, punjabis wudnt be makin up 20% of indian army when comprisin 1.5% of the country...southereners are only fit for sedentary work....
Also it was the Sikh Regiment during the 2nd indo-pak war that kept the border where it is today. Nehru had given the order to retreat, but General Moan Singh disobeyed because if they did Amritsar would have been in Pakistan but he fought them back and made them retreat.
tell me chip-munk which gang do u represent....?? wat fukin race are fukin idiot.....how many times did punjabis give a baseball bat up ur ass.....coz i knw they did.....thts y ur a fukin hater....
im suprised tht ur the idiot who considers even the pathans to be weak....and claim superiority for tamils...!!!
hear me man.....ur tryin to convince me of a fact.....now i aint gonna listen to ur useless shit....bcoz there is quite a possibility tht uve been fuked by punjabis and u hate them.....
now, if u wanna tell me tht tamils contribute more to the crime rate (assumin u knw the meaning of tht term)...plz go ahead and tell, about the place which states tht tamils are more notorious gangs thn punjabis....thts the only way ur goin to convince me
ur such a loser man.....ive told u bout true war statistics.....ive told u wat alexander said bout punjabis...ive told u tht we took western tibet frm chinese which they still crib over....u still cant understand
i consider wars as a better proof of martial superiority...btw....which foreign countries did tamils conquer?? enlighten me....
i consider wars a much better proof of martial superiority...
and i don't hate punjabi people, i think they can be nice people, and their girls are easy so who hates that, i just get angry when they claim to be some warriors, when they're so soft, u kno how many times i seen punjabi's lose beef, every single one that they started, i also find them unreliable in fights
they should just stick to the general indian stereotype and be in the books, but u don't see them doin that either
theres a controversy on whether he was or not......but everyone is certain that he was a great military general...and his hardest fought battle was in punjab where his army lost the courage to move forward...
'their girls are easy'....have u looked at ur tamil face in the mirror.?? stop talkin big fool.....there are several examples of the hottest tamil women being easy...look at ur hema malini and sridevi enjoyin big punjabi cocks...lolz...all the indian porno comes from tamils
cant believe wat u say fool.....tamil gangs are known to be weak.....only prolly good against poor sinhalese present in less numbers.....but tamils are used to get stuff gettin filled up their assholes.....i wudnt even consider a tamil a challenge....prolly the punjabis send their 14-15 year olds to fight tamil gangs and thts the sort of impression u have.....stop lionisin the weakest race on the planet....there is sufficient evidence that tamils are weaklings....gettin fuked in lanka
punjabis are a warrior race.....and tamils are a race of office workers.....ive given u proof.....gang violence doesnt make neone a warrior race...gang violence jus prooves that the community is fuked up, poor and needs to trade drugs.....tamils are all refugees, ghetto ppl
wars on the otherhand are a direct indicator and punjabis form 20% of indian army.....while tamils have a hard time taking care of their lungi....dark fools....please dnt insult me by comparin my ppl to urself tamil fool
@BoxerMonkey you fucking kunt fight me i will have a fucking go at you think youre a hard kunt fight me bitch or go stick your tamil ass up your mums dry pussy
@BoxerMonkey nice to know that your proud of your murder rates and the "contribute" to the rate u fucken fool do you hear yourself your mom should bitch slap ur internet gangster wanna be ass fucken fool murdering people does not make u strong u fucken dumbfuck take that from a university of bc grad in crim btw making fun of sikhs if ur educated enough check the UNITED NATIONS 8 bravest moments in history sikhs in saragahri are very well known next to king leonidis and the 300 at theromaplye
if u still doubt the valour of punjabi ppl.....then ill quote sumthin alexander wrote to his mum when he started his conquest of punjab with and had to face a few tribes:
"I am involved in the land of a 'Leonine' (lion-like) and brave people, where every foot of the ground is like a wall of steel, confronting my soldier. You have brought only one son into the world, but everyone in this land can be called an Alexander.
this comes from a person who had fought from europe to asia
their hand fighting looks weak because they are indian, and again, i'd prefer foreign fighting styles over any indian fighting style any day, because they are not effective, but i don't see how you can say hindu's are weaker than sikhs when the south indian martial arts look more stronger
lolz.....again u say 'looks stronger'.....to me it doesnt.....to me a samurai's sword or a katana action is not comparable to a sikh khanda or talwar......its a subjective decision..please be mature enough to base ur decisions on objective evidence not subjective evidence coz u cant calculate how effective a style wud be jus by lookin at a samurai howling while swinging his sword
ive trained for karate for 6 years.....nd i know tht it wont be of ne use when a punjabi has my throat in his hands
a punjabi will never have your throat, they don't practice fighting with thier hands at all, they only dance with the swords, the gatka shouldn't even be considered a martial art, it should just be referred to as a dance.
samurais sword has been deemed the world strongest sword, that's a fact. and which martial art would i think is stronger, one that practices defending and actual techniques to be used in fights, or one that practices flailing a sword to bhangra beats at festival, get real
'a punjabi will never have your throat, they don't practice fighting with thier hands at all'.......do u have a brain..?? im talkin bout normal street fight......everyone can do that....and the first thing I catch hold of is the throat and squeeze it........
where is it stated samurai is the best sword.....Ok lemme do it ur way.....my nail is better than the samurai....thts a fact... lolz
dude....a fact is not a fact unless proven.....prove it and ill belive it....
are you dumb, catch a throat and squeeze it, listen youth, ur a fuckin fake ass nigga, u never been in no street fight, u only beat up ur girl or ur sister, ask any police, what are they ever called for for u guys.
i could go wiking and googling and emberass ur ass right now, u already emberassed ur self showin ur sensitive side, and contradicting yourself
and it doesn't take a genious to know gatka is not a practical martial art. is there any punjabz in MMA? no, you eat too much ghee
yes im eatin to much ghee....coz i need strength to fuk ur tamil ass motherfuker......u dark-short idiots.....u guys are a pain to the eyes...ur language is a pain to the ears....and tamil-hindus have been proven to have 4 inch diks....hahahaha....nobody wants to be tamil....coz theyre sick...
i kno u get a punjabi dik up ur ass all day.....thts y ur so sad....
see man.....i cant believe wat u say....if u say punjabis are weak...post a webpage or sumthin....
@BoxerMonkey nice to know your from canada come to vancouver sikhs here known to wax anyones asses espically you rare tamils here honestly you would get a brutal beating where im from no joke if you opened your mouth you dog
btw......ive given so much evidence....battles, statistics, ancient struggles of great generals......to justify that we are a great martial race....
Can u even give me one evidence which says tht the race of chinese, black people, or white people shows valour and courage greater than that of punjabis......something apart from 'looks'...lolz...which is quite a subjective criteria.....
btw....i say hindus are weaker bcoz they form 82% of the country yet we (1.5%) formed 75% of the martyrs of indian freedom struggle......they formed majority of the country, yet it was us who repulsed the afghans and the mughals who defeated the hindus many times.....Gandhi hated the sikhs for their violent ways....and we hate the hindus for their weak ways....we form 1.5% of their nation yet we form 20% of their army....sikh regiment is the highest decorated in the indian army...
14 Victoria Crosses awarded to the Sikh regiment. A per capita record given the small size of the regiment, making it the highest decorated regiment of the entire british empire (an empire on which they said sun never set).
The british considered sikhs the best martial race of them all. There were plans to raise a sikh regiment even now, supported by Prince Charles, but they were declined because UK saw this as racism against other groups
i'm sorry, i can't see south asians as being strong, all they do is just kill each other, and maintain their weakness, as they are not formidable opponents, if you tell me victories of sikhs against pakistani's i do not see them as being strong
imagine fighting a foreign country actually known for being strong, like serbia, or congo republic or thailand, do you think indians could actually defeat these people, if so, it wouldn't be by strength, maybe only because of numbers
thts upto you man......you dnt want to realize the world war 2 statistics.....you dont want to realize facts...its upto you man.....if you got any statistics....put them up.....probably we'll see....
btw....i dnt kno y u see chinese as strong.....they are all small weak ppl.....we defeated chinese in sino-sikh wars...took huge parts of western tibet from them which china still claims from india.......how can chinese be better when we over-ran them?
over ran them? sino indo war of 60's was won by china in the end
they have memorial for all the sikhs who died, who i don't deny that they were brave.
and yes i do think chinese are stronger, not physically, mentally, look at chinese triads, that's a gang, but it's still a strong chinese identity, punjabi gangs only beat up pakistani people, or girls, or get drunk in parking lots. if they get in fights with whites or blacks they run away.
lolz.......the sino-indian war was 12000 indians vs 82000 chinese.....we were a new country widout a good army......wat else do u expect?? it was good enouf tht chinese were exhausted and declared a unilateral ceasefire..
U r probably mentionin isolated incidents......ive seen white ppl gettin beaten up in london by paki gangs......i wudnt say white are weak.....
Result: Afghans stalled for 7 hours, 600 afghans dead.
Odds: Much worse than the one shown in 300 movie
Reaction of British Parliament: "The British, as well as the Indians, are proud of the 36th Sikh Regiments. It is no exaggeration to record that the armies which possess the valiant Sikhs cannot face defeat in war" - Parliament of the United Kingdom."
the afghans were probably equally weak or more than the punjabi's
and the uk stuff, the uk just seem to praise your armies, they just like using brown skinned people to die in their wars, like you, and gurkha's of nepal.
another thing, what is so great about a military being used by a foreign ruler. look at the chinese, they have not been taken over or conquered, and they're great armies protected their own nation, their martial arts are respected around the world too
dude....if you think afghans are weak, afghanistan wouldnt be called the 'graveyard of empires'...
You surely dnt know history....the british tried conquering it, failed....
The russians tried conquering it......failed....
The americans tried conquering it in a war which lingers on for 9 years with much of afghanistan out of control.....americans only contril kabul and major cities....
the chinese werent ruled by another because it was a single big country.....imagine this......world war 2 is going on.....XYZ country is a foreign power with interest in taking over europe.....It forms alliance with UK and says it will assist it in war against germans.....brits attack, but XYZ doesnt show up....when british armies are weak, XYZ attacks UK....and then germans with the help of poland...
This is what happened in india.....we just werent united....
hahaha......we took western tibet from chinese in the sino-sikh wars.....how can they be better than us??
chinese are small weak....im yet to come across a chinese whom i can consider 'a man'.....ive got poles as frnds...none of them look 'strong and mighty'....i guess u shud try meetin some true punjabis....
lost every war....??? the sikh regiment was the highest decorated regiment (per capita) in the entire british army during the two world wars.......we lost our country to the brits bcoz it wasnt UK vs India......it was UK vs 600 small states who were fighting each other....brits used devide and rule
u find these ppl lazy bcoz they are not shoutin or howling.....like during other martial arts demonstrations.....neither are they making faces....coz these things dnt matter in real war
you sikhs are talking about islam hahaha islam had also a concept of art of war you stupids look at silat mumbai and the concept and name of islamic warfar was rummi so dont talk to much allahuakbar!
Look man i know stuff that could tear your religion in shreds. you people have terrorised the world to long with your so called "allahukhbar". You people rape innocent women and kill children. ALl that should have been done to u ages ago. Oh yeah and by the way i aint gonna rip it apart. coz allah may punish me. AAAAAAH. AND DONT U EVER SAY ANOTHER BAD THING ABOUT SIKHS. U BASTARDS
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
dont believe everytihn u hear mate coz all of its bullshit
now wen the partition hapnd in india an pakistan u sikhs were killil li'l babies by throwin them in the air an wen they wud come down udd stick ur kirpans in the way ukilled thousands os innocent men women an kids coz u wer told ud get ur khalistan but u were left khali handed so uget me? dont believe everythin u hear
an dont u ever diss islam u ignorant fuck learn somethin b4 u say somethin
im 12 cant wait
burrows480 11 months ago
I'm 11 and I'm going to start Gatka :D Can't wait.
TheJrupal 1 year ago
is that music is of Pink Panther??? btw ..i love Gatka
cjsingh2008 1 year ago
man anybody who took history knows british didn't leave india because of any violent resistance. there was revolutions, sepoy mutiny, anglo sikh war, but they were all destroyed by the british
british people left india on their own
and aren't south indians hindu's? atleast they are the only ones i seen that seem to be agressive, and their kalari martial art looks stronger then gatka by far, they actually look like they know how to use weapons, not like these gatka people
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
You think there was nothing in Indian situation at that time which made it necessary for the British to leave India in a hurry. Why then did they do so? In reply Attlee cited several reasons, the most important of which were the INA activities of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, which weakened the very foundation of the British Empire in India, and the RIN Mutiny which made the British realise that the Indian armed forces could no longer be trusted to prop up the British.
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
chandra bose PLANNED a violent british resistance
but it never happened, he just got imprisoned, and died of illness
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
never happened...??? go read again fool.....there was an INA war.....with many dead and POWs
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
why are you calling me fool, i never personally insulted you
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
BTW.....i havnt come up with this reason....it was the british prime minister who was citing reasons to the british parliament for leaving in a hurry.....after all, the brits did leave in such a hurry tht they gave jus 6 months notice to many british-indian residents to relocate....they didnt want an embarrassment....they left the country in a mess...
subash chandra bose never got imprisoned....ur history is so wrong.....he died in a plane crash when he was leaving Japan....
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
why are you talking of subash chandra bose
i thought u said hindu's are weak
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
60% of INA was sikh.....subhash mightve organised the INA.....we gave our blood.....even though we form 1.5% of tht country
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
'looks stronger'.....are u for real...?? the brits banned gatka during the 19th century coz they considered it a big threat......
the sepoy mutiny and anglo-sikh wars were not fought by the british.....they were fought by indians against indians.....the bengal and bombay regiments fought against punjab in anglo-sikh wars.....the sikhs and punjabis fought against sepoy rebels in 1857......british just financed these....im tellin u...we were conquered bcoz we were devided...
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
kalari was banned in the south too, they didn't want anything that could lead to a strong sense of indian identity
look at some of the kalari video's, i can show you some good ones.
they actually practice techniques, they don't just flail the weapons around, i watch gatka fights, and you see the guys are not even doing anything, only jumping around swinging the sword and not touching each other.
these guys actually block and defend, but again their hand fighting techniques look weak
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
'look weak'.....wtf is the matter with u......tell me this....if the chinese had such superior martial arts, y were major parts of their territories conquered first by mongols.....then by muslim turks.....if white ppl were so mighty...why did arabs rule spain for 800 years...??...now dnt say arabs are better than south asians coz history has it tht afghans have defeated persians and sikhs have defeated afghans....
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
south indians are declared weaklings......the british wudnt recruit from south india because they considered those ppl fit for only 'sedentary work'.....there was no reason for british to favor the punjabis.....
btw......hand fighting styles are useless in real life.....when they demonstrate, its more like a dance which is perfectly choreographed....if ur up against a street fightin guy.....no way can karate have ne advantage....if it had...chinese wudve ruled the planet...!
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
lol, again you twist up facts for your liking, i don't know how you can call south indians weak, when nayars are a martial race, south indians are the only indians that conquered foreign countries, and if you look at any foreign cities that contain both populations, punjabi gangs are regarded as weak jokes, while tamil gangs actually contribute to the murder rate, again, not very important, but just goes to show you can't consider southerners weak, when they're stronger than you
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
Ok.....here ill give u another proof....the british entered india at approximately middle india.....in bengal in 1757.....tamil nadu is the southern most part and punjab is the northern most part....tamil nadu was one of the first states to be conquered despite having the most brilliant muslim king (who was not tamil) and who was the first ever to use missile warfare.....
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
punjab on the other hand was the last to be conquered and the british merely stayed at punjab borders for 40 years (after delhi was captured) and waited for the strong king Ranjit Singh to die so that they could start their 'games' (sons of ranjit singh were assasinated....4 kings changed in 3 years)......despite this....it was punjab which attacked british empire....and later it was a 12 year old king (last son) who surrendered....
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
listen up.....I am tired of giving evidence to an illogical fool....i bet u havnt attended school.....cause when i ask u for evidence to support ur point, u say....'tamils LOOK strong'......heres wat i have to say....My dik can defeat a tamil cause it LOOKS stronger.....
if u want to talk of crime rates....give statistics...cause i keep beating hindus and small chinese (who arent even a challenge) around.....i dnt even kno wat ur talkin bout
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
wha u mean tamilz look strong, they don't, i never said that, they little scrawny ass straight haired nigga's
but da hardest people on da streetz are jamaican, and what do they think punjabi's, u guys are soft
what do they think of tamils, "watch out fi dem"
don't go trying to look in some old wiki article about a war, probably retold by some old punjabi fuck, and den get all proud
look at the everyday world, and what's really going on, gatka's a joke, punjabi's don't run shit
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
are u one of those tamils sufferin from an inferiority complex...?? punjabis conquered both afghanistan and tibet....so we conquered foreign lands as well....
i cant take u seriously.....give me a webpage which says punjabi gangs are weak....coz u talk like a joker..
hahahahaha.....if southerners were strong, punjabis wudnt be makin up 20% of indian army when comprisin 1.5% of the country...southereners are only fit for sedentary work....
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
Also it was the Sikh Regiment during the 2nd indo-pak war that kept the border where it is today. Nehru had given the order to retreat, but General Moan Singh disobeyed because if they did Amritsar would have been in Pakistan but he fought them back and made them retreat.
SahijApple93 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
tell me chip-munk which gang do u represent....?? wat fukin race are fukin idiot.....how many times did punjabis give a baseball bat up ur ass.....coz i knw they did.....thts y ur a fukin hater....
im suprised tht ur the idiot who considers even the pathans to be weak....and claim superiority for tamils...!!!
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
'twisting facts to ur liking'...lolz.....
hear me man.....ur tryin to convince me of a fact.....now i aint gonna listen to ur useless shit....bcoz there is quite a possibility tht uve been fuked by punjabis and u hate them.....
now, if u wanna tell me tht tamils contribute more to the crime rate (assumin u knw the meaning of tht term)...plz go ahead and tell, about the place which states tht tamils are more notorious gangs thn punjabis....thts the only way ur goin to convince me
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
ur such a loser man.....ive told u bout true war statistics.....ive told u wat alexander said bout punjabis...ive told u tht we took western tibet frm chinese which they still crib over....u still cant understand
i consider wars as a better proof of martial superiority...btw....which foreign countries did tamils conquer?? enlighten me....
i consider wars a much better proof of martial superiority...
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
lmao, alexander was homosexual eh
and i don't hate punjabi people, i think they can be nice people, and their girls are easy so who hates that, i just get angry when they claim to be some warriors, when they're so soft, u kno how many times i seen punjabi's lose beef, every single one that they started, i also find them unreliable in fights
they should just stick to the general indian stereotype and be in the books, but u don't see them doin that either
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
theres a controversy on whether he was or not......but everyone is certain that he was a great military general...and his hardest fought battle was in punjab where his army lost the courage to move forward...
'their girls are easy'....have u looked at ur tamil face in the mirror.?? stop talkin big fool.....there are several examples of the hottest tamil women being easy...look at ur hema malini and sridevi enjoyin big punjabi cocks...lolz...all the indian porno comes from tamils
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
cant believe wat u say fool.....tamil gangs are known to be weak.....only prolly good against poor sinhalese present in less numbers.....but tamils are used to get stuff gettin filled up their assholes.....i wudnt even consider a tamil a challenge....prolly the punjabis send their 14-15 year olds to fight tamil gangs and thts the sort of impression u have.....stop lionisin the weakest race on the planet....there is sufficient evidence that tamils are weaklings....gettin fuked in lanka
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
punjabis are a warrior race.....and tamils are a race of office workers.....ive given u proof.....gang violence doesnt make neone a warrior race...gang violence jus prooves that the community is fuked up, poor and needs to trade drugs.....tamils are all refugees, ghetto ppl
wars on the otherhand are a direct indicator and punjabis form 20% of indian army.....while tamils have a hard time taking care of their lungi....dark fools....please dnt insult me by comparin my ppl to urself tamil fool
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey you fucking kunt fight me i will have a fucking go at you think youre a hard kunt fight me bitch or go stick your tamil ass up your mums dry pussy
MsAsh6 1 year ago
@BoxerMonkey nice to know that your proud of your murder rates and the "contribute" to the rate u fucken fool do you hear yourself your mom should bitch slap ur internet gangster wanna be ass fucken fool murdering people does not make u strong u fucken dumbfuck take that from a university of bc grad in crim btw making fun of sikhs if ur educated enough check the UNITED NATIONS 8 bravest moments in history sikhs in saragahri are very well known next to king leonidis and the 300 at theromaplye
lehal68 1 year ago
@BoxerMonkey
if u still doubt the valour of punjabi ppl.....then ill quote sumthin alexander wrote to his mum when he started his conquest of punjab with and had to face a few tribes:
"I am involved in the land of a 'Leonine' (lion-like) and brave people, where every foot of the ground is like a wall of steel, confronting my soldier. You have brought only one son into the world, but everyone in this land can be called an Alexander.
this comes from a person who had fought from europe to asia
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
their hand fighting looks weak because they are indian, and again, i'd prefer foreign fighting styles over any indian fighting style any day, because they are not effective, but i don't see how you can say hindu's are weaker than sikhs when the south indian martial arts look more stronger
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
lolz.....again u say 'looks stronger'.....to me it doesnt.....to me a samurai's sword or a katana action is not comparable to a sikh khanda or talwar......its a subjective decision..please be mature enough to base ur decisions on objective evidence not subjective evidence coz u cant calculate how effective a style wud be jus by lookin at a samurai howling while swinging his sword
ive trained for karate for 6 years.....nd i know tht it wont be of ne use when a punjabi has my throat in his hands
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
a punjabi will never have your throat, they don't practice fighting with thier hands at all, they only dance with the swords, the gatka shouldn't even be considered a martial art, it should just be referred to as a dance.
samurais sword has been deemed the world strongest sword, that's a fact. and which martial art would i think is stronger, one that practices defending and actual techniques to be used in fights, or one that practices flailing a sword to bhangra beats at festival, get real
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
'a punjabi will never have your throat, they don't practice fighting with thier hands at all'.......do u have a brain..?? im talkin bout normal street fight......everyone can do that....and the first thing I catch hold of is the throat and squeeze it........
where is it stated samurai is the best sword.....Ok lemme do it ur way.....my nail is better than the samurai....thts a fact... lolz
dude....a fact is not a fact unless proven.....prove it and ill belive it....
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
are you dumb, catch a throat and squeeze it, listen youth, ur a fuckin fake ass nigga, u never been in no street fight, u only beat up ur girl or ur sister, ask any police, what are they ever called for for u guys.
i could go wiking and googling and emberass ur ass right now, u already emberassed ur self showin ur sensitive side, and contradicting yourself
and it doesn't take a genious to know gatka is not a practical martial art. is there any punjabz in MMA? no, you eat too much ghee
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
i have been in many street fights and i got nothin to prove
wat sensitive side fool...?? hahahaha.....are u an idiot whose IQ is in single digits.....go ahead man....google.....contradict me....
if it doesnt take practice to kno gatka....thn go ahead man....post a video of u doin wat this guy is doin....cmmon...
are u absolutely idiot.....gatka and MMA?? do they allow to slice ur head off in MMA....how many samurais do u have in MMA
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
yes im eatin to much ghee....coz i need strength to fuk ur tamil ass motherfuker......u dark-short idiots.....u guys are a pain to the eyes...ur language is a pain to the ears....and tamil-hindus have been proven to have 4 inch diks....hahahaha....nobody wants to be tamil....coz theyre sick...
i kno u get a punjabi dik up ur ass all day.....thts y ur so sad....
see man.....i cant believe wat u say....if u say punjabis are weak...post a webpage or sumthin....
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey nice to know your from canada come to vancouver sikhs here known to wax anyones asses espically you rare tamils here honestly you would get a brutal beating where im from no joke if you opened your mouth you dog
lehal68 1 year ago
@BoxerMonkey
btw......ive given so much evidence....battles, statistics, ancient struggles of great generals......to justify that we are a great martial race....
Can u even give me one evidence which says tht the race of chinese, black people, or white people shows valour and courage greater than that of punjabis......something apart from 'looks'...lolz...which is quite a subjective criteria.....
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
btw....i say hindus are weaker bcoz they form 82% of the country yet we (1.5%) formed 75% of the martyrs of indian freedom struggle......they formed majority of the country, yet it was us who repulsed the afghans and the mughals who defeated the hindus many times.....Gandhi hated the sikhs for their violent ways....and we hate the hindus for their weak ways....we form 1.5% of their nation yet we form 20% of their army....sikh regiment is the highest decorated in the indian army...
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
World War II:
Many battles.
14 Victoria Crosses awarded to the Sikh regiment. A per capita record given the small size of the regiment, making it the highest decorated regiment of the entire british empire (an empire on which they said sun never set).
The british considered sikhs the best martial race of them all. There were plans to raise a sikh regiment even now, supported by Prince Charles, but they were declined because UK saw this as racism against other groups
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
i'm sorry, i can't see south asians as being strong, all they do is just kill each other, and maintain their weakness, as they are not formidable opponents, if you tell me victories of sikhs against pakistani's i do not see them as being strong
imagine fighting a foreign country actually known for being strong, like serbia, or congo republic or thailand, do you think indians could actually defeat these people, if so, it wouldn't be by strength, maybe only because of numbers
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
thts upto you man......you dnt want to realize the world war 2 statistics.....you dont want to realize facts...its upto you man.....if you got any statistics....put them up.....probably we'll see....
btw....i dnt kno y u see chinese as strong.....they are all small weak ppl.....we defeated chinese in sino-sikh wars...took huge parts of western tibet from them which china still claims from india.......how can chinese be better when we over-ran them?
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
over ran them? sino indo war of 60's was won by china in the end
they have memorial for all the sikhs who died, who i don't deny that they were brave.
and yes i do think chinese are stronger, not physically, mentally, look at chinese triads, that's a gang, but it's still a strong chinese identity, punjabi gangs only beat up pakistani people, or girls, or get drunk in parking lots. if they get in fights with whites or blacks they run away.
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
lolz.......the sino-indian war was 12000 indians vs 82000 chinese.....we were a new country widout a good army......wat else do u expect?? it was good enouf tht chinese were exhausted and declared a unilateral ceasefire..
U r probably mentionin isolated incidents......ive seen white ppl gettin beaten up in london by paki gangs......i wudnt say white are weak.....
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
Battle of Longewala (google it):
120 sikhs vs 2000 pakistani tank regiment:
Result: Pakistani army stalled overnight, eventually defeated
The largest disproportionate tank causality since WWII
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
Battle of Saragarhi (google it):
21 sikhs vs 10,000 afghans.
Result: Afghans stalled for 7 hours, 600 afghans dead.
Odds: Much worse than the one shown in 300 movie
Reaction of British Parliament: "The British, as well as the Indians, are proud of the 36th Sikh Regiments. It is no exaggeration to record that the armies which possess the valiant Sikhs cannot face defeat in war" - Parliament of the United Kingdom."
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
the afghans were probably equally weak or more than the punjabi's
and the uk stuff, the uk just seem to praise your armies, they just like using brown skinned people to die in their wars, like you, and gurkha's of nepal.
another thing, what is so great about a military being used by a foreign ruler. look at the chinese, they have not been taken over or conquered, and they're great armies protected their own nation, their martial arts are respected around the world too
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
dude....if you think afghans are weak, afghanistan wouldnt be called the 'graveyard of empires'...
You surely dnt know history....the british tried conquering it, failed....
The russians tried conquering it......failed....
The americans tried conquering it in a war which lingers on for 9 years with much of afghanistan out of control.....americans only contril kabul and major cities....
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
the chinese werent ruled by another because it was a single big country.....imagine this......world war 2 is going on.....XYZ country is a foreign power with interest in taking over europe.....It forms alliance with UK and says it will assist it in war against germans.....brits attack, but XYZ doesnt show up....when british armies are weak, XYZ attacks UK....and then germans with the help of poland...
This is what happened in india.....we just werent united....
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
ok, if you see an army from eastern euroupe, the individuals actually look strong, even a chinese army.
but indian armies, i watched their training video, they just take chai breaks, they look so weak
and indians don't possess that agression that other nations have
BoxerMonkey 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
hahaha......we took western tibet from chinese in the sino-sikh wars.....how can they be better than us??
chinese are small weak....im yet to come across a chinese whom i can consider 'a man'.....ive got poles as frnds...none of them look 'strong and mighty'....i guess u shud try meetin some true punjabis....
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
@BoxerMonkey
lost every war....??? the sikh regiment was the highest decorated regiment (per capita) in the entire british army during the two world wars.......we lost our country to the brits bcoz it wasnt UK vs India......it was UK vs 600 small states who were fighting each other....brits used devide and rule
u find these ppl lazy bcoz they are not shoutin or howling.....like during other martial arts demonstrations.....neither are they making faces....coz these things dnt matter in real war
kanthasingh54 2 years ago
khalsa mere jaan ki jaan
punjabanjaati2008 2 years ago
skill.
jattdetatta12365 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you sikhs are talking about islam hahaha islam had also a concept of art of war you stupids look at silat mumbai and the concept and name of islamic warfar was rummi so dont talk to much allahuakbar!
tukayana 3 years ago
Look man i know stuff that could tear your religion in shreds. you people have terrorised the world to long with your so called "allahukhbar". You people rape innocent women and kill children. ALl that should have been done to u ages ago. Oh yeah and by the way i aint gonna rip it apart. coz allah may punish me. AAAAAAH. AND DONT U EVER SAY ANOTHER BAD THING ABOUT SIKHS. U BASTARDS
bobbysoldier 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dont believe everytihn u hear mate coz all of its bullshit
now wen the partition hapnd in india an pakistan u sikhs were killil li'l babies by throwin them in the air an wen they wud come down udd stick ur kirpans in the way ukilled thousands os innocent men women an kids coz u wer told ud get ur khalistan but u were left khali handed so uget me? dont believe everythin u hear
an dont u ever diss islam u ignorant fuck learn somethin b4 u say somethin
serialno78666 3 years ago
fuck you bitch. go suck mohammuds dick.
hash1212 2 years ago
Satnaam wahe guru
girishsharma81 3 years ago
Awesome!!
Sherab0 4 years ago
sick...........wow.............that was good.
vinh112 4 years ago 4
great video, but that music doesnt go with it AT ALL. but great anyway. those guys are extremely talented.
blazerpoopersn 4 years ago 6
fascinating!
isatay 4 years ago
good
gurpreetjatt 5 years ago