The film is a composite. The dark image near the center is a horse or mule. Watch carefully in slow motion or frame by frame and see an illuminated person cross behind the horse as the guy goes to the right.. He shows through the head and neck of the horse. Watch the background carefully for movement and you'll find people. I don't trust anything that says BFRO.
much too fuzzy to determine if the video is a hoax or not. I believe in sasquatch, but this looks like a mutated black bear taking a piss in a Denny's resturant. Way too fuzzy.
@norseman7088 No hair samples have produced viable DNA, or stand as proof. Conversely, there have been plenty of hairs allegedly collected at sightings that have turned out to be synthetic. "Authentic" collections turning out to be synthetic hair? Think about it. Casts are casts, impressions that can be made by a real animal or by a human faking them. The only video that looks halfway credible is the PGF film. Nothing else comes close to looking real.
@tontar Additionally, the body cast is likely a hoax. How does a "thing" lay down in mud, get up, and leave no hand or foot prints? There were prints from elk and the researches all around, and in the body cast, yet no bigfoot hand or foot prints anywhere, not a single one. Explain why a biped would see food, then lay down to roll through mud to get at it, then roll out, all the while leaving no knee, no elbow, no hand or foot prints. Thinking it is a bigfoot body defies logic.
@norseman7088 Agreed. :-) Question is, at some point in time we will have to come to some conclusions if one doesn't show up. While I try to stay optimistic that something will materialize, the fact is that it has been well over 40 years since the PGF was made, and nothing has turned up significant since. Not anything conclusive anyway. The woods are shrinking, they are well explored and visited by hunters, hikers, sportsmen, and no physical remains. At some point, conclusions have to be made.
@tontar What I have found Tontar is that the people that are out there searching for it? Are very much against shooting one. They are relying on better trace evidence to prove it's existence. (pictures, foot casts, etc) It's pure folly......science has spoken and they need a type specimen.
@norseman7088 ...such as, were they real? Did they go extinct? If real, where did they go? Some remains would undoubtedly be left somewhere. Heck, we have remains of mammoths still showing up. Ice men, extinct indians. All remains do not melt down and disappear in the forests, in spite of what people might say. At some point, if they do or did exist, something would turn up. Something more than prints and fuzzy photos. If nothing ever shows up, then what? What will people believe in 20 years?
Proof? I suppose everyone has to interpret what is seen, and everyone will differ in what they "see". Myself, I see a dude either relieving himself, putting on shoes or pants, or something, while his buddy films him with a thermal camera. I don't see a sasquatch at all, but a human. It'd be great of there were a soundtrack, and I'd bet it would include "hey, turn off that dang camera, can't a guy have a bit of privacy!!!"
Try another link to this vid, one with more responses, Their are many diverse views and opinions there to be found. Mine included. This is close to being a HOAX and Im not sure that the BFRO had anything to do with it. So dont be so quick to believe what you hear and see about this vid. Working on getting a reproduction of the vid done.
Well, the entity that posted the video was titled BFRO, but that may just be someone falsely acting as the BFRO, I suppose. I don't give the video much credit at all, at least for being anything other than some dude squatting behind a log or bush, possibly relieving himself while his buddy films it!
@marcjtdc BFROs founders last name is Moneymaker is it not? Nuff said. Also on the tv show a grown man is called..Bobo..how r we to take that seriously?
@crazycatlady68 I know. They are self proclaimed authorities. In the tv series finding bigfoot, they proved this was easily faked, but vocally gave mike credit at the end for the best footage since patterson. fuck you bfro and miked green, fucking snake oil salesman.
tontar
The film is a composite. The dark image near the center is a horse or mule. Watch carefully in slow motion or frame by frame and see an illuminated person cross behind the horse as the guy goes to the right.. He shows through the head and neck of the horse. Watch the background carefully for movement and you'll find people. I don't trust anything that says BFRO.
DumDDumDum 10 months ago
much too fuzzy to determine if the video is a hoax or not. I believe in sasquatch, but this looks like a mutated black bear taking a piss in a Denny's resturant. Way too fuzzy.
Comickid1000 1 year ago
They only proof that is going to settle the question is a body or body part.
We have videos, we have pictures, we have foot casts, we have a body cast, we have hand casts, we have hair samples.....it doesn't convince science.
norseman7088 1 year ago
@norseman7088 No hair samples have produced viable DNA, or stand as proof. Conversely, there have been plenty of hairs allegedly collected at sightings that have turned out to be synthetic. "Authentic" collections turning out to be synthetic hair? Think about it. Casts are casts, impressions that can be made by a real animal or by a human faking them. The only video that looks halfway credible is the PGF film. Nothing else comes close to looking real.
tontar 1 year ago
@tontar Additionally, the body cast is likely a hoax. How does a "thing" lay down in mud, get up, and leave no hand or foot prints? There were prints from elk and the researches all around, and in the body cast, yet no bigfoot hand or foot prints anywhere, not a single one. Explain why a biped would see food, then lay down to roll through mud to get at it, then roll out, all the while leaving no knee, no elbow, no hand or foot prints. Thinking it is a bigfoot body defies logic.
tontar 1 year ago
@tontar That's why we need a body, or a part there of.
norseman7088 1 year ago
@norseman7088 Agreed. :-) Question is, at some point in time we will have to come to some conclusions if one doesn't show up. While I try to stay optimistic that something will materialize, the fact is that it has been well over 40 years since the PGF was made, and nothing has turned up significant since. Not anything conclusive anyway. The woods are shrinking, they are well explored and visited by hunters, hikers, sportsmen, and no physical remains. At some point, conclusions have to be made.
tontar 1 year ago
@tontar What I have found Tontar is that the people that are out there searching for it? Are very much against shooting one. They are relying on better trace evidence to prove it's existence. (pictures, foot casts, etc) It's pure folly......science has spoken and they need a type specimen.
norseman7088 1 year ago
@norseman7088 ...such as, were they real? Did they go extinct? If real, where did they go? Some remains would undoubtedly be left somewhere. Heck, we have remains of mammoths still showing up. Ice men, extinct indians. All remains do not melt down and disappear in the forests, in spite of what people might say. At some point, if they do or did exist, something would turn up. Something more than prints and fuzzy photos. If nothing ever shows up, then what? What will people believe in 20 years?
tontar 1 year ago
i didn't see shit...
scarypowers 1 year ago
this is supposed to be proof of what?
eheister2006 1 year ago
And yet again.. no hard proof what so ever!
Arado240 2 years ago
Proof? I suppose everyone has to interpret what is seen, and everyone will differ in what they "see". Myself, I see a dude either relieving himself, putting on shoes or pants, or something, while his buddy films him with a thermal camera. I don't see a sasquatch at all, but a human. It'd be great of there were a soundtrack, and I'd bet it would include "hey, turn off that dang camera, can't a guy have a bit of privacy!!!"
tontar 2 years ago
@tontar It could be Butchykid filming on the other side. XD
Arado240 2 years ago
@Arado240
appears to be a black bear
longtalltexan63 1 year ago
Seems to me that it was scripted. The camera moves to the right before the subject moves that way.
The subject was dead center of the screen so why move it at all?
4tun8one2 2 years ago
Try another link to this vid, one with more responses, Their are many diverse views and opinions there to be found. Mine included. This is close to being a HOAX and Im not sure that the BFRO had anything to do with it. So dont be so quick to believe what you hear and see about this vid. Working on getting a reproduction of the vid done.
MMBFEC 2 years ago
Well, the entity that posted the video was titled BFRO, but that may just be someone falsely acting as the BFRO, I suppose. I don't give the video much credit at all, at least for being anything other than some dude squatting behind a log or bush, possibly relieving himself while his buddy films it!
tontar 2 years ago
@tontar MIKE GREEN is part of bfro and supposedly filmed this. he was charging to see it. i also think its bs.
marcjtdc 1 year ago
@marcjtdc BFROs founders last name is Moneymaker is it not? Nuff said. Also on the tv show a grown man is called..Bobo..how r we to take that seriously?
crazycatlady68 7 months ago
@crazycatlady68 I know. They are self proclaimed authorities. In the tv series finding bigfoot, they proved this was easily faked, but vocally gave mike credit at the end for the best footage since patterson. fuck you bfro and miked green, fucking snake oil salesman.
marcjtdc 7 months ago
Comment removed
bitted 2 years ago