Shell are a bunch of fucking murderers. Look at what they did in Nigeria, and to a good man called Ken Saro-Wiwa. (Well if you cant be bothered, they hung him)
I love how he admits Peak Oil is real and yet still calls it a theory! PEAK OIL HAS NEVER BEEN, AND NEVER WILL BE A THEORY! its a fundamental rule of science and math. End of debate.
In total, if you add up all the renewable energy sources like wind, solar, tidal, as of last year it counted for 7% of the worlds power. Thats pathetic.
"The Global Trading Market is what moves that price up and down."
That market is speculaters. It's psychological. In that sense it is completely arbitrary. Even if you didn't accept that the money they use is not tied to anything. Our monetary policy is as stable as quicksand. That's what the bail-outs were all about - how inherently unstable and retarded the economic system is (including the prices of goods - OIL).
The whole thing is bullshit and he's trying to pretend otherwise.
i hate when they call it a "theory." its been PROVEN, over and over again. when people call it a "theory" they dont understand it. even this shell douche bag says "someday we will peak."
It IS a theory. Like "special theory of relativity", "theory of evolution", "quantum theory", etc. All have had mountains of evidence coming in for decades. Theory does NOT mean "wild guess".
However, people need to learn the difference between "fact", "evidence" and "proof", despite the legal system assuming all 3 are the same.
There is a lot of evidence for peak oil. It's a fact that many countries have peaked in oil production. The theory is that this will always occur.
Not necessarly, because if we left oil levels where they are right now we WOULD have a virtually unlimited amount of natural gas, which is most definitely renewable. and can be converted into liquid fuel.
he agreed in a round about way that weve hit peak oil but other alternatives like gas to liquid and the tar sands will keep production going upward longer so we have hit peak oil?
49 Oil & Gas units have been destroyed completely in the sea storm at Gulf of Mexico causing a daily loss of 13000 barrels of oil & 84 million cusecs of natural gas. But regarding the supply & demand in USA this number doesnt even co-op with 0.1% of the daily consumption they say that the residential consumers will not be affected. But being a very critical issue as concerns the economy sooner or later it will certainly have an impact on devaluation of US $ leading to a collapse in economy.
well, well, well. Oil is going back down. The bubble has burst!! Now what are the doomsayers gonna say? A meteor? A hurricane? Perhaps UFOs? LOL. You people.
Search for Amory Lovins. We can easily move off of oil in a convenient and economically stimulative manner over a few decades simply by improving efficiency using existing technology. He claims we have 9 million barrels/day sitting under Detroit. He of course means that we can tap this oil by simply IMPROVING EFFICIENCY WITH EXISTING TECHNOLOGY.
we cant run out of oil. ppl in texas are striking oil big at where there they previously dwelled. you can argue all you want but oil is as natual as water. another thing carbon dioxide is GOOD for plants. so saying that it causes global warming is a farce. the main cause is the sun. any real scientist will tell you that. look it up.
the head of shells us operations. now what dou think hes goin to say. that oil doesnt create greenhouse gases and oil isnt running out. these guys are worse than fox. that asian guy is trying to be white isnt he. geez.
That guy talking at the end must be a speech writer for Bush. Maybe he was just trying to make the guy look good who said, "We will peak but it won't be because we don't have enough oil".
The fact that they are resorting to citing desperate forms of oil(garbage shale formations and 6 mile deep ocean pools) is a crystal clear indication of our current supplies if you ask me...
A few reasons: That lifestyle sucks compared to now. No youtube, computers, electricity, or living to be 70 years old.
More importantly: There are six billion people now. It is arguable whether or not that many people can be fed without industrial (i.e. oil dependent) farming.
The world takes a little over a week to consume a billion barrels of oil. We are not finding oil at anywhere near that rate, and what we do find is very deep oil that will have "technical difficulties" and be expensive to produce.
He may be a paid hack, but he is right about one thing: we wont peak because we wont have enough oil. We will peak because even though there is lots of oil in the ground, it will simply cost too much energy to make it economical to pump it out of the ground. There could be a thousand barrels below my feet, but if it costs a thousand barrels to pull it out of the ground, then it doesnt do a whole lot of good does it? I'm having a hard time believing that hacks like him dont understand that.
1. Matthew Simmons looks at all countries, not just Saudi Arabia. He examined the middle east, africa, the north sea, brazil, mexico etc. He obviously didn't bother to read Twilight in the Desert.
2. Unconventional oil will not supply the gap from decreased conventional oil production. There is a reason it is called "unconventional".
3. If you burn it, you get CO2. Unless you want to compress and then sequester it underground (fairy tale), you aren't going to reduce emissions.
Matt Simmons is only one of many credible people saying oil will peak soon. Hubbert predicted the peak of U.S oil supply. He was right about that one, and he will be right about world oil peaking. It may be later than he thought, but it will still happen.
He admits peak oil will come but in the same breath says it won't be "because of not enough oil", he doesn't deny conventional light crude may be peaking.
Problem is alternative oils - shale, tar-sands, deep deep deep ocean oil like the new find off Brazil are all very expensive to extract and use huge amount energy and CO2 to get.
The other oil is biofuels - even at current limited production we've tripled world food prices - with global population heading for 10,000,000,000 - forget it!
Yeah, this was total bull. He mentioned that they are discovering more oil, but they are discovering less and less fields.
And what the hell was up with that squawk box? Was he supposed to be a skeptic of what that guy was saying? I couldn't even understand what he was saying, he was like insane.
Yet again, they are misleading the people. Not the first time, nor the last, be wary.
For those who don't know: "Peak oil" has nothing to do with running dry. It's about running SLOWER and SLOWER, beyond the peak. This propaganda piece was pitiful. What's even more pitiful are the crackpots who say crude oil is not a fossil. :/
Matt simmons does take into account unconventional oil this was pure propoganda,you have a thing called energy return on energy invested with unconventional you may be putting in more energy than you get out so its just not going to work .
oil shale tar sand their all smokescreens they need lots of natural gas and water they arent going to replace oil
Yeah this was pretty awful. The best the oil industry can do is set up straw men arguments. It's evident crude oil has already peaked couple of years ago.
grow hemp and oyster mushrooms, then work from home, and smoke joints in leisure time, massive reductions in use of crude oil, think about it.
MrHEMPKING 5 months ago
Peak oil is not a theory. It's a fact.
claudelebel55 6 months ago
Shell are a bunch of fucking murderers. Look at what they did in Nigeria, and to a good man called Ken Saro-Wiwa. (Well if you cant be bothered, they hung him)
I love how he admits Peak Oil is real and yet still calls it a theory! PEAK OIL HAS NEVER BEEN, AND NEVER WILL BE A THEORY! its a fundamental rule of science and math. End of debate.
In total, if you add up all the renewable energy sources like wind, solar, tidal, as of last year it counted for 7% of the worlds power. Thats pathetic.
moonsugar1 7 months ago
this guy is full of shit
yourmajezty 10 months ago
"The Global Trading Market is what moves that price up and down."
That market is speculaters. It's psychological. In that sense it is completely arbitrary. Even if you didn't accept that the money they use is not tied to anything. Our monetary policy is as stable as quicksand. That's what the bail-outs were all about - how inherently unstable and retarded the economic system is (including the prices of goods - OIL).
The whole thing is bullshit and he's trying to pretend otherwise.
bobbygnosis 1 year ago
Yeah, this comes from a guy who's an officer in an oil company!!! what else you expect him to say.
Estronguista 1 year ago
This guy sounds like a drug pusher. The commentators are a bunch of ignoramus's.
1776independent 1 year ago 3
Even the unconventional oil is a non renewable resource. It will obviously come to a production peak. It's inherit in the phrase non renewable...
As other's have said, unconventional oil is expensive, and dirty.
bdist 2 years ago
The oil will peak because we will not be able to pay for the expensive, unconventional oil.
In any case, life will be a lot different in the future.
Siddis33 2 years ago
i hate when they call it a "theory." its been PROVEN, over and over again. when people call it a "theory" they dont understand it. even this shell douche bag says "someday we will peak."
Brandonly23 2 years ago 2
It IS a theory. Like "special theory of relativity", "theory of evolution", "quantum theory", etc. All have had mountains of evidence coming in for decades. Theory does NOT mean "wild guess".
However, people need to learn the difference between "fact", "evidence" and "proof", despite the legal system assuming all 3 are the same.
There is a lot of evidence for peak oil. It's a fact that many countries have peaked in oil production. The theory is that this will always occur.
DarkCalaba 2 years ago
Comment removed
falldownhard 2 years ago
Comment removed
falldownhard 2 years ago
Not necessarly, because if we left oil levels where they are right now we WOULD have a virtually unlimited amount of natural gas, which is most definitely renewable. and can be converted into liquid fuel.
Brandonly23 2 years ago
he agreed in a round about way that weve hit peak oil but other alternatives like gas to liquid and the tar sands will keep production going upward longer so we have hit peak oil?
reedy93 2 years ago
fucking cocksucker motherfucker, he's sceptical whether co2 causes global warming!
stacieoz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
49 Oil & Gas units have been destroyed completely in the sea storm at Gulf of Mexico causing a daily loss of 13000 barrels of oil & 84 million cusecs of natural gas. But regarding the supply & demand in USA this number doesnt even co-op with 0.1% of the daily consumption they say that the residential consumers will not be affected. But being a very critical issue as concerns the economy sooner or later it will certainly have an impact on devaluation of US $ leading to a collapse in economy.
yahoovisitor 3 years ago
well, well, well. Oil is going back down. The bubble has burst!! Now what are the doomsayers gonna say? A meteor? A hurricane? Perhaps UFOs? LOL. You people.
Stan1208 3 years ago
Woohoo, finally oil is only 4 times as expensive as it was 5 years ago, not 5x as expensive.
16fcali 3 years ago
Search for Amory Lovins. We can easily move off of oil in a convenient and economically stimulative manner over a few decades simply by improving efficiency using existing technology. He claims we have 9 million barrels/day sitting under Detroit. He of course means that we can tap this oil by simply IMPROVING EFFICIENCY WITH EXISTING TECHNOLOGY.
rewards1dude 3 years ago
we cant run out of oil. ppl in texas are striking oil big at where there they previously dwelled. you can argue all you want but oil is as natual as water. another thing carbon dioxide is GOOD for plants. so saying that it causes global warming is a farce. the main cause is the sun. any real scientist will tell you that. look it up.
beyondstitches 3 years ago
the head of shells us operations. now what dou think hes goin to say. that oil doesnt create greenhouse gases and oil isnt running out. these guys are worse than fox. that asian guy is trying to be white isnt he. geez.
swamimans 3 years ago
That guy talking at the end must be a speech writer for Bush. Maybe he was just trying to make the guy look good who said, "We will peak but it won't be because we don't have enough oil".
scrabbleking1965 3 years ago
He means that we will switch energy sources before we run out. I really really hope he's right, but I don't have much hope.
16fcali 3 years ago 2
The fact that they are resorting to citing desperate forms of oil(garbage shale formations and 6 mile deep ocean pools) is a crystal clear indication of our current supplies if you ask me...
Garcia0384 3 years ago
This John Hofmeister is a lying sack of shit. He is a rich fat glutinous pig by gouging the shit out of us consumers.
kosherkarl61 3 years ago
Why don't we just go and live the way our forefathers did? With wagons for transportation and a simple life?
PatrickLars 3 years ago
A few reasons: That lifestyle sucks compared to now. No youtube, computers, electricity, or living to be 70 years old.
More importantly: There are six billion people now. It is arguable whether or not that many people can be fed without industrial (i.e. oil dependent) farming.
16fcali 3 years ago
Oil is finite and we will eventually run out.
lowellriggsiam 3 years ago 2
The world takes a little over a week to consume a billion barrels of oil. We are not finding oil at anywhere near that rate, and what we do find is very deep oil that will have "technical difficulties" and be expensive to produce.
776281 3 years ago
lol, this guy is funny. thanks meister man for the laughs. nice face. oh, if you eat less calories, you'll lose weight, btw
holon67 3 years ago
Take this med and stay asleep...
Steadno 3 years ago
He may be a paid hack, but he is right about one thing: we wont peak because we wont have enough oil. We will peak because even though there is lots of oil in the ground, it will simply cost too much energy to make it economical to pump it out of the ground. There could be a thousand barrels below my feet, but if it costs a thousand barrels to pull it out of the ground, then it doesnt do a whole lot of good does it? I'm having a hard time believing that hacks like him dont understand that.
Iconoclast421 3 years ago
1. Matthew Simmons looks at all countries, not just Saudi Arabia. He examined the middle east, africa, the north sea, brazil, mexico etc. He obviously didn't bother to read Twilight in the Desert.
2. Unconventional oil will not supply the gap from decreased conventional oil production. There is a reason it is called "unconventional".
3. If you burn it, you get CO2. Unless you want to compress and then sequester it underground (fairy tale), you aren't going to reduce emissions.
philistineau 3 years ago
Matt Simmons is only one of many credible people saying oil will peak soon. Hubbert predicted the peak of U.S oil supply. He was right about that one, and he will be right about world oil peaking. It may be later than he thought, but it will still happen.
526norton 3 years ago
He admits peak oil will come but in the same breath says it won't be "because of not enough oil", he doesn't deny conventional light crude may be peaking.
Problem is alternative oils - shale, tar-sands, deep deep deep ocean oil like the new find off Brazil are all very expensive to extract and use huge amount energy and CO2 to get.
The other oil is biofuels - even at current limited production we've tripled world food prices - with global population heading for 10,000,000,000 - forget it!
ruckrover8 3 years ago
Yeah, this was total bull. He mentioned that they are discovering more oil, but they are discovering less and less fields.
And what the hell was up with that squawk box? Was he supposed to be a skeptic of what that guy was saying? I couldn't even understand what he was saying, he was like insane.
Yet again, they are misleading the people. Not the first time, nor the last, be wary.
Socrabess 3 years ago
This is Simmons reply:
d0t cnbc d0t com Sl4sh id Sl4sh 23728987
gonjamon99 3 years ago
For those who don't know: "Peak oil" has nothing to do with running dry. It's about running SLOWER and SLOWER, beyond the peak. This propaganda piece was pitiful. What's even more pitiful are the crackpots who say crude oil is not a fossil. :/
gonjamon99 3 years ago 2
Matt simmons does take into account unconventional oil this was pure propoganda,you have a thing called energy return on energy invested with unconventional you may be putting in more energy than you get out so its just not going to work .
oil shale tar sand their all smokescreens they need lots of natural gas and water they arent going to replace oil
bearsagainstevil 3 years ago 7
Yeah this was pretty awful. The best the oil industry can do is set up straw men arguments. It's evident crude oil has already peaked couple of years ago.
gonjamon99 3 years ago
...1.41 - "We WILL PEAK - but it won't be because we do not have enough oil".
1. How is this Debunking Peak oil theory????
2. So what causes the peak????
PeterSodhi 3 years ago
1:36---Yeah, my logic gear totally ceased on that one too! That was a pretty retarded statement.
UnderseaCaveman 3 years ago