Added: 3 years ago
From: cptmuji
Views: 102,572
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (479)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It is totally crazy to just put this excerpt ! Put the whole video if anything !!

  • I've also found that if you just take one day of your life and pretend for the whole day that there is no such thing as coincidence, you discover many interesting things all around you that you never noticed before!

  • Nassim Haramein - pissing in the fountain of knowledge that unsuspecting people will drink from. Although evidently some people like the taste of piss ....

  • I live in this vacuum. I totally get it! ;)

  • I think you may have made a much larger discovery than even you may realize. If you go with the dot theory, because u can see it lol, and you start with a finite boundary, like a circle. Once polarization has occurred and new boundaries have been made, but are 1 step smaller, is also like a new dimension. If that were true then dimensions are also infinite in relation to the number of reductions in steps or increases. Therefore all dimensions have certain frequencies and hertz levels.

  • Damn everytime he says vacuum I picture my Dirt Devil.

  • My synchronocity was crazy all week last week, i got the dream job i wanted, anytime i thought about anything it would just show up. I was thinking about the lotto ticket i bought and then while in traffic this guy selling tickets passes by and one of the tickets gets blown on to my car window, i bought it but didnt win anything, but just the fact of something like this happening is just mind blowing, i truly believe im in sync after landing my dream job, once you're sure it keeps happening!

  • hello, does any one has the email address of nassim haramein by any chance, i have few questions for him thanks.

  • When Galileo said the sun was not at the center of the universe, people looked at him like he was retarded. Remember, they even threatened his life. Think about this before you speak out againt a free thinker with radical ideas. Many of the natural laws we live by were once thought to be utterly ridiculous and impossible. Cogratulations to Nassim Haramein for taking a step forward, not backward. 

  • @suncollapse

    That's not what Galileo said. Nor were his actual claims all that ground braking - most 'intellectuals' agreed with him. No, Galileo was the other side of the coin - an intelligent man with a well supported theory, being oppressed by superstitious morons who had no understanding of science - whereas Nassim Haramein is a superstitious moron trying to pass off his bullshit as a legitimate theory.

  • @c6gunner Go away you stupid flying-spaghetti monster-denier/blasphemer!

    On a serious note, it's hard to convince someone when they have already presupposed metaphysical naturalism, a fairly laughable position.;)

  • @c6gunner If scientist don't WANT to even look at information coming from a field not their own then who is the superstitious moron?

    Scientist have to acknowledge that the gap between 'science' and 'religion' is closing rapidly. fundamental 'truths' have always bin elegant and simple yet hard to understand. by ruling people like nassim out we deprive ourselves from a perspective which could give the blind science sight.

    religion without science is lame, science without religion is blind.

  • @nevyn1

    Scientists look at all information. What they don't look at is pseudo-scientific babble being passed off as information. If you think that "the gap between science and religion is closing rapidly", you're an uninformed jackass ignoring all of human history.

    Science without religion gives us cars, computers, and trips to the moon. Religion without science gives us crazy stories and wars. It's also the only way religion can survive - by encouraging ignorance while denying science.

  • @c6gunner So, you're saying 'They look at all information, but not this.' makes no sense, anything perceptible is information. What nevyn1 was saying is that there are scientists who take the zeitgeist of the secular scientific age, as related to their particular field, as gospel. Get it? The quote from Einstein summed it up, but I think you missed that.

  • @c6gunner You cannot have science without religion, it is faith and feedback that confirms our faith(which Nassim is talking about) which shapes our reality. All scientists are religious, just not in the beardy man in the clouds way. Their faith and drive to understand are no different than a christians to understand God. All things are one which is why you can refer to all things with one word: everything. Thus, understanding science, or religion, is understanding yourself.

  • @Politicious

    Now, seriously, if Nassim's bullshit didn't impress me, why do you think that your bullshit would have any effect? I don't care what kind of nonsense you make up to try and justify your idiotic world-view; the facts are simple: science is a reliable, verifiable way of gathering data and making new discoveries, whereas religions are a collection of fairytales concocted by ignorant fools in order to make themselves feel less ignorant. That's it.

  • @c6gunner Lol alright sweetheart, enjoy your life.

  • @c6gunner You've hit there nail on head there. haramein uses strong neuro linguistic programming techniques to indoctrinate his audience. If you watch some of his other videos he continually convinces his audience that scientists are 'close minded' - so his audience then don't listen to scientists (very clever!). Of course this doesn't work on people with a science background because we pick up on the stench of bullshit everytime haramein opens his fraudulent little mouth.

  • @Starsandfunk

    I don't really buy into NLP either, at least not in the way it's being marketed these days. If you're defining NLP as "smooth-talking snake oil salesman who knows how to make himself appear intelligent to the ignorant", then yeah, he's quite good at that :) I'm just not sure how using the buzzwords of the woo crowd ties in with NLP, though.

  • @c6gunner The techniques he uses are NLP, the buzzwords are just a small part of it. Essentially he prgrams his audience by:

    Comparing himself to great physicists;

    Waving his 'award winning' paper around (which is a total fraud);

    Says: ignore what scientists say because they are 'close minded' but WE are 'open minded'

    By the time haramein has finished programming them they think he's great, they are great, and anyone who proves otherwise is 'close minded'. It's cult indoctrination.

  • @Starsandfunk

    *shrug* I just call that "lying" and/or "conning people". I don't have a problem with you calling it NLP though :)

  • fuck....carl jung you crazy person...i didnt know there was a term for what happens to me everyday....why does it happen though? So many strange coincidences throughout my day.

  • That sounds like a Methodist. I offered to be a missionary at a Methodist church where I was finding the differences, here. I don't find my balance to be any difference than anyone's.

  • so beautiful

  • VERY  GOOD!!!

  • Why don't you synchronize your watch with the other residents of your town, get down to the local Burger King, and forge ahead with that life-altering job application?

  • just from reading the comments i see that the balance has nearly tipped!! soon there will be a change on this planet for the good!!

  • Check this out. Jung's ideas of synchronicity and a collective unconscious are what directly follows when you put the physics concepts of Penrose and Bohm together: watch?v=qAjC81MUe_I

  • I've experienced synchronous events all my life. For instance, having a friend exactly the time you need a friend, or 100 people coming to me named the same way, and they're all interested in me. It's goddamn strange and fun.

  • His idea of synchronicity is wrong. You cannot control or direct synchronicity. It just happens. No vacuums or crystal bullshit.

  • @EGMAG Correcting your "just happens" theory. Nothing just happens in this Universe. For every reaction there must first be an action to have created it-- that fact does not get dismissed when it comes to synchronicity. If you think about it, this is good. It means you have control of your experience. If that does not appeal to you, I don't know what would.

  • @TheMushshroom "just happens <<

    Well partially. We direct some actions although there are random actions throughout the universe, on earth and in behavior that cannot be controlled or directed. 50/50. Synchronicity "just happens" depending on the circumstances of course, that pre-cluded the event as you say. I never meant for you to take the cause and effect theory so out of context. Just happens in the realm of each seperate event like oops I just happend to spill my coffee.

  • @EGMAG I agree that there are certain things out of our "conscious" control, we nevertheless have the power to influence or effect the result or outcome on a deeper level. You have the power not to spill your coffee, what determines that you do? Even though appearing as random and mistake, you never the less had hand in it. Observe it from a higher perspective. Something inside of you created that situation. We know that the coffee cannot spill itself. Consciousness precedes all things. Peace

  • @TheMushshroom "conscious" control. outcome on a deeper level. .....

    Hope you never do mushrooms. Your example fails to recognize the autonomic system where a muscle spasm occurs, and is not a result of deeper level concious directing.

  • @EGMAG Tell that to a Buddhist Monk who can regulate his own heart beat and keep comfortably warm when exposed to freezing cold temps- using only the focus of his mind.

  • @TheMushshroom  Monk << Hindus too. The power of auto-suggestion. Oh I studied the subject when I was 12 yrs old and do think there are an "extremely rare few" who can possibly attain this sensitivity; actually a psycho-somatic talent learned through many years of endurance, mental and physical excersise, & by long studies of ones daily physical bodily functions and motor reactions. Not for the average person on the go usually.

    Realize there are many fakers too!

  • @EGMAG Can you tell me what autosuggestion is at the sub atomic level? I don't believe only some rare few humans can attain this, I believe it's inborn in everyone, it's just a matter of turning your awareness inward and having the patience to develop it- which alot of people don't- not many are aware of this capability within them. Deeper level conscious directing is a false term in "pick up a rock and move it", but if you look at it through concept of autosuggestion, you are on the right track

  • @TheMushshroom Can you tell me what autosuggestion is at the sub atomic level? <<

    Did I state that?

  • @EGMAG No I just was wondering if you know or are familiar with it

  • @TheMush- what autosuggestion sub atomic level? <

    "ALL" mass/matter interactions in the universe first begin in the realms of sub-atomic particles; many continue forming larger molecules to compounds, graduating to what I call "progressively larger material clusters" & so forth.The "BRAIN" is evolving material from "sub-atomic particles" to mass/matter; thus "thoughts" are born from sub-atomic-particles & used in all kind of thinking, meditation & even auto-suggestion. White light being source.

  • have synchronicities every day and leave paragraphs a day on my journal. I am getting paved an answer to a way to heal my injuries and the synchronicity has led me there. I am also getting it for me to start a social network like Meetup.com.

  • this isnt his only video dumb asses this guys been doing this for 15 years or more now. hes not explaining anything but the fundamental reason of why everything spins in the universe. from a tiny atom to the galaxy it all spins. its loosely based on fibanacci sequence. 1,1,2,3,5,8,13, and etc. when you get about 30 numbers into you can divide them and make the golden ratio. "phi" like pi its 1.618 about half of pi. look it up.

  • I expected a much better talk on synchronicities, especially from someone like Nassim. Here he says other people can also influence your universe....I don't believe that has to be the case if you really don't want other people in your universe. I expected something better especially from Nassim because in other videos I heard him talk about universes. I expected he would explain synchronicities in the context of (parallel and/or the creation of) universes.

  • this is pretty logical

  • NON SEQUITAR

  • synchronistic events are occurring so frequently for me, its like a ride on a roller coaster all the time, quite amazing, and exciting I must say........... started to occur about two years ago............ they occur daily, at least 3 or 4 times or more....... its a fun ride:)

  • @cdbfort Well that is just your imagination because you've taken these ideas of witch there is no proof what so ever and then you have to look for "synchronistic events" otherwise life would be boring right ? these hallucinations are a protection mechanism .People are not sending information to the vacuum no more as rats do or no more than worms do .Counsciousness is psychy related delusiv in nature witch means that it doesen't exist outside you're head .

  • @slevin741 thanks for your reply selvin, I guess you are theroitecially correct, it is my imagination, of which there is no concrete proof, but if you think about our 'reality' every single man made object we currently have in existence on this planet, started as a thought form, in some ones head...... which eventually projected into reality in the form of a material object, originating through tthought..... so , thoughts do become things, or realities..... so can synchronicities.....

  • @cdbfort If you act on your thoughts there will be consequences otherwise nothing will happen or change that's my point .Do you agree ?

  • @slevin741 absolutely, its also my point, the mind, or thought, is what your reality is.............so even if you claim synchronicity is imagination, as it may well be, so is all thought............ thats how it starts, is created...... some of those thoughts are manifested into this reality that we currently understand as this life.......some are not manifested.......and yes, of course , for the ones manifested, they become consequences.......of the original thought

  • @slevin741 Acting on thoughts is one thing sure. But whats described here is the desire to want something. That desire is energy, and the energy is given out into the unified consciousness of the world and fed back to you in the form of manifested people or things that you needed and they came at a certain time in your life. Thats what's they're saying here.

  • @echelon820 Thoughts are small nerve impulses and all activity of the body is carried out with the help of electrical signals emitted by our brain cells .Now suppose that this energy is captured by the vaccum . How does it know whitch are thoughts and witch are not in order to respond correctly ? How can vacuum recognize desires and how does it know not to give you back to mutch or to less ? Do you actualy belive this is true ? Don't answer if you don't want to .

  • @slevin741 I know you want to sound smart and all and thats great, but thoughts are not nerve impulses. The transistion of conjoining sections of the brain during the thought creation process explains these impulses. An actual thought as represented by a complete and functional expression of oneself is non existent at end end process of these impulses. The same way you and I are sending back messages is how its done. You receive some kind of reaction which decides your response. Theres no vacuum

  • @echelon820 Look this is not ego related thus I don't want to sound smart or anything like that .  Offtopic: what do you do ? are you a physicist ? Maybe I wasn't so accurate defining thought's but please give me a explanation on the rest of what I've said because it seems to be correct . Brain waves can be represented via functions and thus equations ,is that what you mean by "functional expression" ? ok so who/what is sending you back this "reaction" ?

  • @slevin741 no I am not a physicist. I exist ad infinitum outside of temporal space. But I am getting off topic. I think you're comfortable with the idea of a physical being. That everything falls at the same gravitational rate (9.8 mtrs/sec). But what the guy is saying here is that consciousness is not only individual but also experienced in a network similar to the internet in fashion. That we're all connected by the same things and that brings about energies of will which become manifested

  • @echelon820 Yes the same way you are comfortable with the idea of unity of meaning maybe it is because you want all this to have a purpose .Only 4% of the universe is known witch means 96% is unknown(black matter) witch means most of the universe is empty and lifeless ,there is no unity .  Anyway this conversation was nice .

  • @slevin741 "Only 4% of the universe is known witch means 96% is unknown(black matter) witch means most of the universe is empty and lifeless ,there is no unity "

    You agree that it is "unknown", and yet you label it as empty and lifeless like you know the facts. Just because we can't detect it with our senses does not mean there is not something in that space that we just do not have the ability to percieve.

  • well I can understand how you wold feel that way. but if you think of it in terms of goals then it makes more sense. have you ever set a goal in your mind then achieved this goal? well this would be your consciousness manifesting itself. no one decided the goal but you. human beings are given free will, moreover than rats and worms who are only limited to animal instincts to decide their destiny. conscious awareness is truly a gift that in itself can shape an entire universe.

  • @cdbfort Yeah I have those events in my life too. It's called shit happens. It's only natural that patterns will emerge that APPEAR like some kind of divine order to all things but this is nothing but egotistical desire.

    Synchronicity is a delusion. Significance being assigned to things because ignorance prevents you from understanding how such things can and will happen regardless of your false perception of how unlikely they are.

    Do you assign significance to the instances....

  • @cdbfort..(cont) in which nothing of "synchronistic" order occurs?

    Self-awareness does not increase the occurrence of "synchronicity". The PERCEPTION and belief that such a thing exists is what makes it seem like it's occurring more. You will LOOK for it and falsely assign significance to things that are not defying our reality or proving divinity.

    It is a pathetic attempt by mystics to pretend we are supernatural entities. There is no need and no reason for such beliefs.

    Beauty persists.

  • @Tsresponds Look at the Know-It-All. Preaching reality as if he created it. Shutting ideas that don't align with his own in a rude, insulting tone. "If you believe in a divine order you are a delusional pathetic mystic, with false perceptions." If you're going to try and influence people with what you think, first tip, don't threaten them. The way you present your argument has ego written all over it-- with that in mind you have no credibility to declare another persons belief egotistical.

  • @TheMushshroom

    "Shutting ideas that don't align with his own."

    Nope. Shutting out ideas that have no backing.

  • Tsresponds What specifically are you referring to by "backing"?

  • @TheMushshroom "What specifically are you referring to by backing."

    You'd like me to describe the specific piece of evidence that synchronicity doesn't have? lol

    Synchronicity is a misunderstanding of mathematical probability coupled with the desire to feel that there is a divine order to things. It is an illusion. The apparent increase of "significant" events is the product of the minds interpretation of those events.

  • @Tsresponds I'd like you to tell me what you think is necessary for it to make sense. Not the ''non existent" piece of evidence I already know you don't believe in. No matter how you slice it, you're stating your opinion. You can't prove it doesn't exist just as I can't prove it does. All I can do is pay attention to my life and gain knowledge from my experiences.

    If you really want to go there, everything you experience is a product of your minds interpretation.. no way around it.

  • @Tsresponds I know nothing about probability etc. but I am aware of the whole mutual birthday 23 people need thing. Like another person said, you have no strong evidence to back up your claim and the onus is NOT on the believer in this case.

  • @Tsresponds oooooh man..... soooooo not an illusion...

    but feel free to believe so....

  • @cdbfort I am also experiencing events that are statistically impossible. I started out only experiencing events weekly, then daily, and now up to 5 times a day. I do not believe I am searching out these events, as a scientist I rely on empirical data, however, these events far surpass that which my scientific mind can comprehend. There are too many events which defy logic based in classic physics. Therefore, I must consider data that is not encompassed in my formal thought process.

  • @cdbfort you must be a lovely person haha. they sometimes happen to me...

  • What the fuck am I watching?

    This guy is insane and you are all morons for believing this shit.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @ZombiePuppy Obviously he is explaining about the latest technologies in the wonderous world of vacuum cleaning, give the guy a break will ya :)

  • @ZombiePuppy No seriously this guy is full of it, he needs to replace the bag in the vacuum cleaner.

  • @ZombiePuppy If you don't understand this at all how can you possibly be able to know if its right or wrong?

    This type of talk can only be understandable and opinionated on IF you have a wider conscious state of mind to be able to view it.

  • @ZombiePuppy Try to suspend your judgement and your usual expectations, and spend a few weeks "pretending" that everything around you is happening in response to your emotions and expectations. You might feel like a fool at first, but play with it and humor yourself at it for a while. You'll eventually notice that the universe is responding to you directly through coincidences which are so insanely improbable that you'll nearly poop your pants. But if you don't acknowledge it, it won't bother.

  • Comment removed

  • @miro108 I think it's bullshit because if you have such a view of the universe in witch you are in the center of it is pure egotistical thinking ,what he is describing is "the secret" witch is a scam .

  • @slevin741 He is using the same marketing as many cons do ,i'm not saying he is a con and personaly I think he is a physics genius just that these particular ideas about the universe and man are misinterpreted by him .

  • what this man describes sounds very familiar to me, only i call it "selective observation", u filter out only that which at a given moment is of interest to u

  • Holy shitt. And the vacuum brought me to you, Sir. Just yesterday actually. It was 2am in the morning and the past week ive been trying to do researches about consciousness and the universe. That 2am, i found someone streaming your 5hr lecture and i just watched all of it cause it was exactly what ive been looking for.

    Thank you so much for all the knowledge you share to people. It helps so much!!!! Hopefully a lot more people wake up. Humanity needs to advance. Its stuck and just rotting from

  • This video explains exactly what I'm experiencing --- I got first introduced to Abraham, then the Ra Material: Law of One, then Bashar (yesterday) and now to Nassim. The more yearn and think of getting to know myself, the more of these amazing teachers are introduced to me. Thank you for this video.

    With much love,

    Shari

  • OK heres a diferent type of coincidence that happend,driving out of town & returning back home B4 the next morning

    while flipping radio stations a 4-5 (odd) songs were strangely continuing to repeat for the third nite we drove anywhere together WE WERE VERY AMAZED

    THEN also to our AMAZEMENT

    we heard 1 particular song 5 TIMES over a 4 hour round trip

    although itsa good song , it really doesnt get any air time hardly im sure

    COULD THAT BE SYNCHRONICITY ALSO ? ? ? ?

    ANYONE ?

  • @z1inspector Can i RULE OUT "selective awareness" ? ,

    i know songs repeat across the dial ,guess u could hear 25yr old song often enuf 2 X maybe mor rare 3x ,5X is kinda odd

    BUT OK ,SONGS REPEAT ,PLENTY I GUESS ,so songs on the radio arent good examples . .

  • @z1inspector if if feels like synchronicity it most likey is.....it happens all the time and goes unnoticed....but yes, songs on the radio are not a good example. I make long drives and every station has their genre and "top songs" at the time. if you are noticing multiple synchronicities in your day, id consider that a good thing....unless u are manifesting negative thoughts. If things r working in your favor, be thankful!

  • HELP ANYONE !

    i seem to have CLUMPS or a of rash of "coincidences" real heavy for a few months then dissapear ( this last time they wer gone for a few years ) then i started having a few a day to now several 6,7, maybe 10 (SOME meaningless ones )a day ,& some BIGGER 1s to connect a conversation from a few days ago to me actually (by chance?) turning my car around in the parking lot of the place we wer conversating about (lost & far from home)

    WHATS GOING ON?

    ANYONE?

  • How did the Egyptians move Ramases statue across a mountain range over the Nile & in the dessert! it weighs 1000 tonnes! we could not lift that today! especially over sand! it was granite! copper tools cut that! yeah right! there is no cuts out of the mountain to dig a trench to send a barge! (common belief!) how would you put 1000 tonnes of statue on a barge! it would sink/break or topple over! (they only had wood then!) thats when I started checking this guys story out!

  • this appeals to my intuition

  • Just for those who don't know the guy: Nassim Haramein is a charlatan who never studied physics, misunderstood what he read about it, and freely admits to receive his ideas through crop circles.

  • @kFrederking so you know him?

  • @thirdeyeblind3

    I have read dozens of pages of his theories and watched a couple of hours of his videos. He may be a nice guy, maybe fooling himself as much as others, but one thing is certain: He doesn't know what he's talking about.

    His belief in extraterrestrials communicating with him via crop circles is just the dressing on his general ignorance.

  • This is not a theory but an hypothesis. And a demonstrably falsified one at that.

  • This is not a 'theory' of anything - it is a hypothesis. Now go test it, having made a proper study of such things as 'confirmation bias' 'wishful thinking' and 'probability.'

  • TRUTH ...... ONEUS

  • That was the best explanation of this I've heard to date.

  • @EleanorHandcart ask those questions

  • @AZ5420 azureworld.blogspot(dot)com/20­10/02/nassim-haramein-fraud-or­-sage-part-2(dot)html this blog does, and get's 'his answers' which lead to more retardation on NH's part. I'm sure he means well, but honestly, making science up =/ as creating a scientific theory :X feel free to look at the points made in the blog, OR stick your head in the sand, and laugh my comment away. Please note that this blog doesn't attack mr. NH, only it points out he HUGE flaws in his theory & paper .

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @devilzown11 At ur request I read that blog. U & the author of the blog have fundamental misunderstanding of action-reaction phenomenon of nature!! The reason a brick moves after being kicked or an explosion radiates 'outwards' is due to the fact that after forces are applied they cancel out. The remaining force vectors are the direction in which the object moves or expansion radiates!! Now it would be impossible for Big Bang to radiate w/o a 'contrating' opposing force > or = the matter blast.

  • @devilzown11 To contrary ur blog man believes that an expanding, 'big bang' universe is something different than the action-reaction phenomenon of natureS! It is exactly the same! EXACT!! So glad your blog man brought up the action-reaction part! So just because it's far away it has different laws? NO!! He infact pointed the pistol at his own argument!! LOL! There would be zero expansion w/o opposing contraction = or > than the force of explosion- infinite dense gravity('contraction').

  • @devilzown11 Your blog man is too deeply immersed in the brainwashing of the establishment physics to understand a new paradigmatic shift that has taken place!! Ha, people just never change, they never change. We can point out to just how many times in the past the shock of truth rang out & the exact same cock roaches come out just like you & your blog man. You people can't see that you're all just playing the exact same role as all the others throughout history- you people just never change!

  • @quantumpolice ooh look, someone telling other people what I believe! And telling me that I'm brainwashed! How exciting.

    Keep going dude, this is great. I'm playing a role in history! :-)

    Ok, seriously, how about you stop inventing things about the universe and pretending you can read my mind.

    "It would be impossible for Big Bang to radiate w/o a contracting force" - come at me again with that. What's your reason?

  • @TheBobathon Dude, you're not worthy of being given the information. It's like when you're walking down the street & a belligerent, slimy, dirt stained wino street person w/ ripped clothes & his butt hanging out goes, "gimme a quata man! Hey, you pussy gimme a quata damn it!!" Are you gonna give the curmudgeon a quarter? No!! To me YOU are that same curmudgeon!!!!

  • @pishdad you sound lovely too.

    This is what happens when you ask questions around the followers of these kind of characters. Doesn't bode well.

  • @TheBobathon Brother, you need to go back & cry to your Hawking daddy. When the truth shines it shines light on cock roaches like you. Your comments are simply the result of cock roaches caught in the light scampering for cracks to disappear into. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

  • @pishdad You're quite the poet, aren't you. Very nice. Can you express withering contempt in haiku? I'd like that

  • @TheBobathon. TheKaBobathon?! I like that! It's a great haiku. You like?

  • @TheBobathon Okay....here- "My family loves "TheKabobathon" in spring!" How's that?

  • @TheBobathon You know TheKaBobathon, if I were in Vegas & I were going to lay down bets on contributions to physics at the world famous Physics Hotel there on the strip, I'd place NONE of my chips on your contributions, but I would place all of my chips on Harameins contributions.

  • @quantumpolice i think it is just an attempt (reptie?) at misinformation

  • @thirdeyeblind3 I don't know what you're talking about. ???? What is just an attempt at misinformation?

  • I think it is just an attempt at misinformation 

  • @thirdeyeblind3 ??????????? (reptie?) ??????? Man bro, please be a little more informative in your communications. I've no idea what you're talking about!!

  • @devilzown11 the link is broken :( . I am skeptical of NH, his stuff is way far out there, but the papers I have read of his (the swarzchild proton mostly) made sense and all the apparent HUGE flaws that some pointed out were actually just misunderstandings or attempts at misinformation.

  • @thirdeyeblind3 You're claiming, that out of millions of scientific minds, none of them respect NH work, because of ... misinformation? Or millions plainly 'don't understand his work'? He's exposed, out in the public. Anyone with the will and understanding can check his 'research' and yet, noone gives a crap. That should tell you something. But believe what you will :> i preffer facts.

  • @devilzown11 it has nothing to do with belief, it just makes more sense than the current model that "modern science" has. also there are no facts. your ignorance annoys me

  • @thirdeyeblind3 Somehow you're missing the point & insist on calling me ignorant :> Look, Einstein was FAMOUS for his innovative work, though he must have pissed a lot of mainstream scientists off. Even though he stepped on a lot of toes, he still was a superstar in his day. This kind of proves that if NH would be so right, and so innovative, he'd get a lot of byfall from his peers. But not, he hasn't... Better yet, his funding has been taken away aswell. (not to mention his paper proves itself)

  • all i can say is G. W. Leibnitz meets C. G. Jung. Throw in a little William Blake, and a sprinkling of Isaac Newton, Stephen Hawking, Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger, and you've got an excellent foundation for a solid theory of everything. Yes i know there are others that fill in essential gaps, (interpersonal behavior, perception, cognition, economics, etc.)

    not to mention upanishadic thinkers had this all figured out millennia ago.

  • When we think of ourselves as just the ego just a machine, we don't exist.... at least according to the vacuum. Synchronicity comes ALWAYS at all times, universe is very efficient. Universe sychronizes things in our life as if to Scream yes hey i can hear you now, loud and clear, 10/4 Good Buddy

  • Very dope vid... Nassim is the man! I've been having a lot of experiences like these recently haha... multi-dimensional 7th crystal wake :) surf the vibes yo

  • his ideas are very interesting. i have my own ideas and theories but i rarely share them, since i already know how people are going to react. like these commentators down here ridiculing him.

  • @larry89 Why don't you start a blog with your ideas and invite people to look at them openly? It's a bit prejudicial to think that people will ridicule you, and a little uncharitable to them and your ideas. People aren't out to get you if your ideas are just 'different', and if you make mistakes along the way people will point them out and say why. So your knowledge increases and perhaps your theories will develop more robustly. Remember, pointing out mistakes isn't a personal attack.

  • @steeltable218

    you're totally right. i was in fear of being attacked on a personal level rather than on a logical level. and yes it was very prejudice of me to think that nobody would listen. thanks for "pointing out" my errors. it's funny how haramein's theory can sorta apply to this lol

  • Although yes, he is a fraud, nether the less, I'm currently enrolled and taking courses in quantum physics and theoretical physics. I plan on writing a paper that takes some of the bits and pieces of his ideas, and puts them to good use. For example, the whole idea, the idea that gravity doesn't just bend space time, it twists it in a corialis shape. (This is, already known, and is the reason our earth "revolves" around the sun, and doesn't just go directly toward it like a magnet).

  • @spencertron88 The idea of space-time being twisted is not Haramein's, and he doesn't understand it. It was derived in 1918, within three years of general relativity.

    And it has nothing to do with the earth revolving around the Sun, or anything else currently observable.

    And there isn't such a thing as a corialis shape. Or even a Coriolis shape.

    And none of it has anything to do with quantum physics - which Haramein doesn't even believe in anyway, or understand.

    Good luck on your course, though!

  • @TheBobathon Your absolutely right, he has no idea what he's talking about. But yet... he INSPIRED me, (partially) to get a degree in physics. Integral calculus is a bitch though, each problem takes up a whole page. I'm getting really tired, and I probably should be doing my homework instead of browsing YouTube! lol

  • @spencertron88 that's brilliant. :)

  • Interesting.

  • I LOVE that "crazy" explorers create such huge leaps in scientific understanding despite the stiff necked rigidity and religious dogma suffered by members of organized science!! I understand that no one likes to hear the words "We don't need you!!!". Nevertheless... in a nutshell: Science is free and everyone is free to do their own exploring and their own thinking. Following the dogma is fine, if that's what you want. Some of us don't. Fortunately, free will is for everyone.

  • @JustForSissies Haramein's 'leaps in scientific understanding' are fake, dude.

    Yes, science is free for all, this is a wonderful thing! Unfortunately fraud is also open to all. This guy is a fraud.

    I'm not asking you to take my word on that - do investigate for yourself... as you say, free will is for everyone. :-)

  • @TheBobathon Interesting. You sound a lot like an evangelist. Organized science is a religion that "knows all there is to know" and anyone who dares to suggest otherwise is the devil. Thanks Rev!

  • @JustForSissies Oh, ok, you want to invent silly thoughts for me and laugh at them. Fair enough. :)

  • @TheBobathon You are not qualified to tell others what to think, let alone what to look at or consider, and the fact that you cannot see the correlation between what you are seeking to do, here, and what the church seeks to do sort of proves that, don't you think? Hounded by both institutions for most of my life, I assure you, they are exactly the same. They use the same tactics, seek the same result and whine, in perfect harmony, when someone objects to their perceived "authority" and I LOVE it

  • @JustForSissies You're right, I'm not qualified to tell anyone what to think. Which is why I don't.

    A scientist who believes that science knows all there is to know is as daft as an explorer who sets out thinking there's nowhere else to go.

    I'm no authority. I bow down to those with unresolved childish authority projection issues. Lead on and I will follow, oh wise one.

  • @TheBobathon LOL! Lead or be led, eh? I choose neither but, then again, attempting to stop the spread of thought and ideas isn't leading, It's manipulation. And the oh so scary threat of your disdain is also not "leading". If I cared about your opinion of me, that would be coercion. Organized religion and organized science would disagree but, fortunately, for those of us "too stupid to think for ourselves", "manipulate" and "coerce" are both in the dictionary. 

  • @JustForSissies Yeah mate. Whatever.

  • Horseshit, absolute horseshit - peppered with nonsensical non-sequiters masquerading as insight.

  • i understood everything he said as he described how i see things (not word for word) in an intuitive manner, I am an intuitive person but Im not lost in some distant fantasy in my head. There is something more to what our reality is and in some ppl's perspective god is the intelligent fine-tuning consciousness, am i right? the thing is, this god is not a fictitious being separate but all-powerful.. it is rather a force that animates being, and we are co-creating one another

    I am another yourself

  • Comment removed

  • @twohseven

    "am i right"

    No.

    The man is literally taking out of his arse, he is just stringing together random non-sequiters, pseudo-science and wilfully obfuscated phraseology - in an attempt to communicate some vague epistemology that has evolved in his head through years of poor thinking and intellectual dishonesty.

  • And the the Titanic came flying out of his ear!!

  • A number of people seem to misunderstand Nassim. If you just want to listen to short video clips and speeches then your doing yourself an injustice. These speeches and seminars are only an introductory course into his real work, which is his scientific and mathematical publications. Go and double check his real work, which is the math, not just what he's saying, because unlike language theres little that can be lost in translation with mathematics.

  • @Psychickinetic Done that, my friend. In detail. The unambiguous language of mathematics makes it all the more clear that it's bullshit.

    It's full of holes, empty of mathematical and scientific coherence, and it barely even relates to the conclusions he makes from it.

    Please see bit[dot]ly/schproton and associated pages, for example.

    I'm guessing you're a bit mathematically naive, given the nature of your comment. But if not, I'd love to know of any criticisms you have of my analysis :-)

  • i dont know what the fuck kinda weed this dude is taking but i want some of it.....i want to see that fucking vacuum too...and i dont get to see enuff holes so i like the idea that theres lots of blackholes around me...beautiful. this dude is awsome...i like that feedback concept...who needs weak and strong forces fucking lame forces from those idiot scientists who come up with that shit and they still cant find a way to get me to the moon without burning and polluting the atmosphere.

  • Wow, that reminded me of a sycronistic event which happened in my life that reinforced the reality of what Haramein is saying. I was attending a psychologist for personal growth and she recommended a specific book for me to read. It was Ram Dass's "The Only Dance There Is". I was astounded because a particular friend of mine had just given me the book before I went to my appointment. This friend whom I called my guru. True story!

  • How can I translate it to portuguese and put subtitles on it?

    Please somebody... HELP

  • Is the vacuum the internet?

  • 5/19/13 expect us

  • great stuff. love it

  • like a puzzle.

  • this guy is a liar, serious conman. smart people can see thru this

  • @Koolvedge define smart

  • @sypha0x people who can think for themselves

  • Hand talker.

  • Absolutely right.

    I've experienced this when i felt completely balanced a few years ago.

    And i felt it fade now that i lost some of that awareness of me.

  • KIDS DONT SMOKE CRACK

  • “In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.” - Galileo Galilei