You're assuming alot...you know what that makes you right?
I mean, what arrogance to suggest you know the reasons for everyone's comments.
Also, just cause many people repeat the same/similar ideas or opinions, doesn't mean their "regurgitating": if that were true, no two people could every agree on anything—one would always have to be regurgitating the others opinion/idea, which is a false choice.
Until you prove your all knowing insight into the reasons why people made the statements/videos they did, you're still assuming; you're doubling down on the concept that no two people can come to a same/similar idea, even if one later CHOOSES to go with the other persons more accepted way of explaining THEIR ideas/opinions. You're also saying, by totally agreeing with another person, somehow ALWAYS makes you a follower.
Lots of assumptions, I can tell you're not big on Science.
"Oh yeah, they're all doing the research into various religions and really understanding those belief systems, examining the scientific conclusions and proposals with critical, thoughtful analysis, really considering their untenable naturalistic stance and coming to their own conclusion."
1) You're suggesting otherwise, which is to say, YOU KNOW the reasons why they're doing this: "content is endless regurgitation of the same old shit."
I don't have to show you where. Your arrogant assumptions and implicit statements, reek of your KNOWING their reasons for comments, ect. Don't deign it. Over and over again you SAY they're "endless regurgitation" which again and again goes to your issue: NO two people can think,agree upon the same thing. Ever. If they don't use theirown words to explain their opinions/ideas, they're brainwashed.
So, well, maybe you feel Religion is brainwashing too, lots of repetition there, regurgitation, borrowing of similar ideas to express underlining agreement.
IF NOT, your hypocrisy should become clear.
To suggest specific people, for specific reasons, don't apply critical thinking is one thing, but to say "It's amazing how many 'independent thinkers' are jumping on the atheist train" and other broad statements is a whole lot of assuming
1) NOT A LITERAL "TREE OF ALL KNOWING" you dumbass, I was making fun of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.
2) When a "believer" tries to suggest, what were once seen as divine historical accounts are now allegorical or metaphorical stories, necessary or not to their belief, it shows how logic exists though strangled so their brain doesn't cave-in.
3) If you're going to defend the existence of Eden, as is word-for-word believed by millions, well, I'll say good-bye.
LOL REDNECK: How the hell did you grab that from you ass? I'm not a redneck, the idea is making me laugh so hard I'm crying.
Yes, the level of assumptions you make (not to be confused with a hypothesis: which comes from tried and tested data) goes against Science, so friend, well, I'm not the clown. I'm not the one whose been vomiting up all sorts of assumptions and wide sweeping assertions—no specific facts relative to persons in question, to show. That'd be you.
I think you should work on your reading comprehensions skills:
1) I didn't assume you were religions, I said, "...MAYBE you feel Religion is brainwashing too...IF NOT, your hypocrisy should become clear" I didn't even imply you were religions. I SUGGESTED, that perhaps, you held RELIGION to the same brainwashing standards, you hold these people here.
Let me know if finding a way to type in crayon will help you understand.
Thanks for your geo-resume, though I didn't ask or care, nor does it lend any particular weight to what you've said, accept, if its true redneck means 3 different things, suggests you should specify a particular meaning, if outside the most commonly known to anyone who knows who/what a redneck is.
I've also lived outside the US and have never heard it used other than is commonly known, but w/e.
"I've come across your type before. The 'comment troll' patrolling the comments section of Youtube with an imagined intellectual authority, Not A Single Uploaded Video. Just open an account to show the world how clever you are."
Do you understand what this implies about people with videos vs those who don't?
The caps come and go as I feel you need help understanding. Tell me if you're having trouble again.
"Hypocritical, just look at your very first reply comment"
My first comment to your across the board assumption:
"How is that jumping on the same train instead of coming to the SAME LOGICAL CONCLUSION?"
That's hypocritical how?
My second comment, too long to repost, calls YOU out on your assumptions, the reply to my first post. Remember, all this started from your initial comment. That's all I've been talking about: You, based upon what you type.
1) You said: "It's amazing how many 'independent thinkers' are jumping on the atheist train."
2) I replied: "How is that jumping on the same train instead of coming to the SAME LOGICAL CONCLUSION?"
That's a question, not an assumption and not broad since I'm ASKING ONLY YOU based only upon what you said.Seriously, I hope people from your country are better educated. God you make me laugh.
Finally you admit it: "Atheism requires zero thought."
So you are a believer, either of a particular dogma or some kinda theist.
Man, if you would've just admitted you have a problem with people who don't believe in God in the first place,
instead of saying "...it's funny. Assuming I am religious because I am critical of moron atheists like yourself deluded into believing they are actually thinkers because they are atheists," we could've skipped all this.
Lastly, just because you and your few friends use redneck in reference to Americans, well, doesn't really give the word other definitions in "the three English speaking countries you've lived in"—if you think it does, well, you're an idiot. Your personal, incorrect usage, confuses people, yes, those people you think agree with you; cause its retarded. If you want to group all Americans, a word already exists: Yank.
I'll write it in crayon, maybe then you'll remember.
Lastly, I've tried to find different meanings for redneck, but they don't seem to exist online.
So, either you're lying OR those other meanings, aren't really known to many people world wide; unless you can prove otherwise, I'd suggest you don't use it outside its meaning, cause you're only going to confuse others and make yourself look like a dumbass.
Do you feel Religion is as much brainwashing as you think these Atheists are brainwashed?
If not, explain the difference in one group agreeing with/going along with—though they might've gotten there through different means—a single idea, for w/e reasons vs that from the other?
To be clear, cause I don't want to confuse you, I'm not assuming anything...this is just a question OK?
There's nothing wrong there (though maybe some people need commas to help them know how to pause when reading, to help them hold together one cohesive idea: classic literature hurts their little heads) but I see now, crayon is the only way to talk to you.
Like I said trying to prove or disprove the existence of a creator is futile and is not "sense" but nonsense. Only those that admit they don't know are being truthful with themselves.
Yes, I openly admit my ignorance, as will most any truly inelegant person, case in point I just finished watching a few episodes of "through the wormhole" and the greatest minds on the planet all say they have no idea what holds the universe together, in fact, the more we discover, the more we realize the magnitude of information we don't understand. While I may consider an atheist to be a fool, I consider someone that claims they understand God to be even more foolish. Agnostics r
1) Agnostic answers the question, "Is there a God" with I don't know.
2) Atheists answer the question, "Do you believe in God" with, No.
If you're not sure theirs a God, you can't say you believe in God and if you don't believe in God, whether its from not knowing or just cause, than your an Atheist, atleast until proven otherwise.
Also, not knowing all the ins and outs of the forcing (Gravity, the S/T Nuclear Forces, Electromagnetism) making up the known universe and reality, doesn't mean you're willing to superimpose some man mad belief in its place—it simply means, we haven't gotten there yet; but that's a far cry from two people in paradise, a talking snake and a tree of all knowing b.s.
Yes but ask any child if there is a God or not and they'll say there is. Creation is all the proof I need. A fool has said in his heart, "There is no God."
Fantastic point, and very telling of the intellectual standards so many religious people have set for themselves: a worldview supported by a child is sufficient evidence for any supernatural belief.
Bravo, at least you're honest about your willful ignorance.
A child could only say there is/isn't a God, if he/she knows what God is; and if he/she knows what God is, they've already been exposed to one opinion or another of his existence—like more for the positive; however, if you find a child who has no concept of God, he/she will either say NO or ask "What is God"
Religion as practiced in western society has been twisted around throughout history, and now has become something so ambiguously preached as to have everyone interpret it their own way. The real source of religion lies beyond any conceptual apprehension. It is truly a higher state of consciousness which the ego is the veil or hindrance from this realization. There's many paths to this experience, i.e. meditation, a near-death-experience, psychedelics taken at high doses, etc. Many paths, 1truth.
No doubt. Would love to hook up with her and help make atheist babies so the planets IQ could evolve to higher levels, like my manhood when she's on the screen.
Science has no facts,as most of them are proven wrong,whether they only state it as a change and not a correction,makes no sense and proves pure ignorance.all of science is a theory,and as such it remains.Science is blind faith,for a atheist believes all that they say,having not seen it there self,nor having any facts to prove it,just theory's.A atheist is lost,do not bother with them,they will only hurt u,for there souls grief,that's why they watch these vids.to try and validate there emptiness
Suggest you pickup a book, specificlly "The World of Physics" published 1987, Volume III, some where between pages 600 to 700, there is a 20 page essay on what a scientific theroy is, you need to learn this. Sorry, I can't narrow it down any more, but, its been a while since I read it.
ALL YOU ATHIESTS ARE TRYING TO DO IS FIND EVIDENCE OF A GOD THAT DOES NOT NOT LIVE HERE, GIVE UP, what do you expect a lock of gods hair, is that enouph proof, no, okay, how bout a tooth, are you serious, what kind of evidence do you need, the only evidence i have is geology and races and prophecy, mainly prophecy is literal proof
Wow, you are very dumb. Seriously. You have been brainwashed believing science is bad. Your parents were obviouslt not critical thinkers, neither are you, and hopefully the chain of ignorance ends with you.
@19nisey69 what kind of evidence do you need? seriously, and just because you dont believe in him it doesnt mean he isnt up there mad at you, god said the wicked and adultress generation seeks after a sign, and there will be none, but if you want god to reveal himself, youll get your wish, you ever read revelation, and plus not everyone is chosen for heaven, only the good people, which im not even part of, so if you can go to heaven, i would take gods offer
You can give all the facts and truths you want, show how things work, give logical explanations, but it will never be enough to a person that wants to believe. How sad is that? Just like a child that wants their way and refuses to listen. Sure you can listen to a religious person, but they come up short on answers to your questions. God is not an answer, we dont even know what that is or if it is at all.
Satan HATES God & wants as many people as he can get to turn against God so he can destroy their souls .Satan knows he's going to lose his war with God & he's really worried about that - don't fall victim to Satan, rebuke Satan & all evil outloud~!!! Seek Christ, through Him seek your redemption before God - pray and repent; confess your sins to God through Christ and beg God's forgiveness for your sins to obtain your salvation~! Fight Satan with Christ~! Prepare your soul as the end is upon us!
A harder shell has been introduced into the population making them harder to break open. Inevitably this causes them to become more successful and the softer ones will eventually disappear because they will be consumed.
Some traits can be productive and others can be detrimental to the organism. Yet others can change the species but neither effect it positively or negatively. Dogs are a great example of evolution but not the only evidence. Sand dollars are another great example of evolution at work. Just in the past 20 years we have seen a drastic change in the sand dollar. Probably due to the over abundant predators who feed on the eggs.
@daddyg321"the "facts"science gives on several matters, you will find much of it is unproofable, weakly supported faith."
That is what you have to keep telling yourself so you can feel right about clouding your mind with nonsense? Science ALWAYS offers testable models before it is accepted by the community at large. Generally if it is not falsifiable it's not science.
@Relativisticism I was a science major and now work in electronics, I remember climatgate, and the coming new ice age in the '70s. These were testable proofable models?Please show the test model for the THEORY of evolution.
@daddyg321 science major eh? hmm you must have skipped high school biology then? A simple model is the canine model. Granted that humans drive the traits due to selective breeding of traits that humans find desirable, where as in normal evolution survival drives the process, although NOT exclusively. Genes are basically the driving force behind evolution. Certain genes can become dormant or recessive, however not completely lost. (cont)
@daddyg321 dogs were/are originally wolves, but through selective breeding they became more docile than wolves. The point being, look at how many traits that dogs have, size, shape, color, intelligence, stamina, speed, strength. You get all of those traits due to gene activation. We are no different and any it can happen within any species.
@Relativisticism Canines are canines, like all animals they have variation, but I have still never heard of a canine being turned into anything but a canine.
@daddyg321 well actually your statement is convoluted because you are expecting that a species need drastically change into another species, which does not happen in one generation. So you will never witness a canine actually become something else because the process is gradual spanning probably thousands of generations. All species are transitional species, but the definition they hold is what people get caught on assuming they are 'set' and unchanging. The are far from unchanging.
@Relativisticism I know science and I know you still haven't answered my question,and never will. Again prove an animal became another animal, not a variation of the same animal.
We are vastly different from the species from which we evolved.
You, like so many others who know almost enough about biology to make gaping, absurd errors, seem to expect gross changes in common species during your short lifetime within this period of environmental stability.
That's not how it works.
We do see evolution in a human-friendly time span when we observe vastly changed environments, such as new bacteria which live on hospital cleaning products.
Are you not aware of WHY we have been unable to produce an effective vaccine against HIV?
It's because the virus is mutating (evolving) so rapidly that by the time one vaccine is created there are dozens (at least) of NEW varieties so different that the veccine-educated immune system cannot recognize them as the target organism!
Yes, sir, you are watching evolution in action.
And the current environmental changes will accelerate evolution globally.
Science majors don't talk about "proofable models" and "unproofable" and "the facts science gives."
And those who have studied evolution do not attack it; especially with the ignorant arguments you are using. I believe the evidence, daddy, and the evidence strongly suggests that you are a lying poseur.
Continuing with Hitler, it is believed that his speeches hypnotised people to do his bidding. Scary to think, but plausible. Also, the way he used rhetoric put the Jews in such a bad light it was easy for everyone to hate them. The reason Hitler failed was becase he tried to take as much land as soon as possible. Once he invaded Poland, he lost the chance of gaining all the land he wanted through appeasement. War began and he stabbed ally Russia in the back. Truly an insane individual.
@MFLuder77 Hitler's plan, from the beginning, always was to get liebensraum in the east. Read Mein Kampf. Also, Hitler only made a pact with Stalin so he wouldn,t have to worry about fighing on 2 fronts, like in WWI. After realizing that Britain wouldn't fall, he decided it was time to apply his original plan: Get the lands of the USSR and get rid of the bocheviks and the Jews, wich he thought, were the same.
@Imaginefree69 Are you going around, looking for my comments to troll me or pick a fight, you fuckin looser?!! LOL!!! Didn't momy and dady give you enough attention when you were a child? you're pathetic, get life! Don't even bother replying, I don't have time to waste with your self-gratifying childish games. you call yourself an educated adult? You might be educated but you certainly don't act like amature adult, boy.
I would rather NOT encounter your irrelevant spam, but you see to be posting it everywhere I go.
I note that once again you have chosen to attack me in a personal way rather than be adult enough to either defend or withdraw your irrelevant little sermon about Hitler's plans.
At least you're consistent.
I'll make you a deal-
you stop posting irrelevant trash and I'll stop pointing out that it's irrelevant trash.
Even a six-year -old should be able to understand that deal.
@Imaginefree69 Yeah, i'll make you a deal: Go fuck your mother!! Who the hell do you think you are, smart ass?? My reply was for someone who had it all wrong with WWII facts, and it was none of your goddamn business to know why I wrote my comment. So you can take your contempt for me and shove it far up your pipe. I'll post whatever and wherever the fuck I want. You don't like it, well, ignore it and we'll be all just fine, asshole.
Hitler's did have race hate and hate of other religions. However, his prime directive was not to simply kill off everyone he didn't like; it was world domination. The superior Aryian race was only a side fantasy of his from his delusional mind. But his plan was ingenious at the start: Take advantage of the poverty of germany, rise to power by raising hopes, convince them that rich Jews were to blame for all their hardship, go to war with the people who oppressed them (the one's who won WWI).
Religion was not the cause of the Crusades. It was merely a tactic for Europe to make people fight for them. In actuality, they were fought to get control of the trade routes which went through the Middle East. Europe didn't want to deal with the "Middle Man" anymore to get stuff from China. How do you convince small minded people to fight for you? Say that the Middle Easterns have a corrupt religion and in the name of Christ we must attack. Religion: not the cause of war, but the cover up.
@naujphantom I don't think that's the suggestion. I think that leap of faith happens when, you continue to believe, despite the obvious flaws and errors in the thing that's being believed. In this case, god and the bible. With all the errors and lack of ANY physical evidence to prove any biblical story, but to still blindly believe, is a leap of faith.
Whe GOD unleashed the Universed, i was there. When He started creating the world, I was there. And when He was working the trees and rocks and lakes and plants, I was there to see it.
What I find interesting is that athiests also have the need to get together to "share"their experience with each other. Dawkins just finished a tour here recently,addressing athiests in each city. looks a little like they're developing the need to congregate. No shame in it,we were created with a spiritual need.
Don't play in the rain...well, if i were you, ill just play...and see whats the outcome of it! if u get sick, then, thats for not listening to an advice...then find out the reason why u got sick...i mean, thats a whole lotta facts a kid need to know why you fall sick, if ure talking about how viruses, immune system etc works...so...just dont play! and be a good girl! :D
i ask and urge you all to serach Lawrence Krauss AAI 2009 on youtube. His lecture basically explains how the universe comes from nothing, how scientists KNOW it comes from nothing, and it tell you just how insignificant we all are.
I can ask how did the universe come to be? And a physicist would tell you big bang, you ask how did that occur? He answers with a scientific theory, then you ask ... Ooo so you don't really know?
God creating the universe is just as valid as the big bang theory because we will never, ever know. And if there is a God then he can tell us how it did happen.
The problem is that you cannot really evaluate theories. Ok you might test your theory 1000 times, but it still might fail the 1001 time. While on the other hand 1 single fail is proof that the theory is invalid. You can exclude theories, but even if you only focus on theories you couldn't exclude yet doesn't mean you can't exclude them in the future.
You obviously haven't taken a peek at my profile...
The bottom line is, the big bang was a one time event, a singularity. God creating the universe is a singularity as well, something we will never know and never will find out. By time the universe dies or contracts or what ever it does, us humans as a race would most likely become extinct. BUT if there is a God, and he is true, then that is our only way to really find out.
Oh God! You Devil.... "Ever seen a top without a bottom? Ever seen a back without a front? Ever seen a left without a right? Then you most certaintly never have seen a Good without Evil. "No wonder regligion behaves like evil doers at times"!
I must say I'm amazed by the shallow arguments presented here. Religion is a polemic concept, a lumping together of elements that have nothing in to do with each other. Any statement on 'religion' is therefore bollocks; religion is everything here stated and more, it is both healthy and unhealthy, pathological and a curitive, sane and insane, regressive and progressive; the term is simply too broad to state anything about unambiguously.
I'm not sure I entirely agree with that. As all religions share a prime universally common trait, (belief in lack of evidence i.e 'faith') most can be generalized in conversation and debate. Such as the recurring chain of religious extinctions. The ancient pantheistic religions to the fading Mormonism and fundamentalist Christianity.
RELIGION (ALL) = FRAUD. Religion is the root of ALL evil and the cause of current and most past wars
RELIGION = Apartheid, separateness, us Vs them.
RELIGION distorts logic and trains people to believe in the supernatural and blur their sense of reality.
The world needs to consign religion to history. How can any half-intelligent person believe in miracles, virgin birth, angels, afterlife with the imaginary boss? Just mythical, evil nonsense.
It's definitely an agent of control, tho. That, and it's useless to practice today. We no longer need to pray for rain to extinguish fires while there's a firehouse nearby.
@goldstead you have never been more wrong. Religion is not the root of all evil. Its not even evil at all. the bible tells all about Love faith peace and god. Its the people who are evil. people like you and me fight to show which side is real and prove that. I prove that god is real and you prove that he isnt. A conflict was invovled just like times before. Religion didnt make people that way, their descisions did.
Good grief, what a fatuous statement that is. Clearly you have never read the bible. It's the bloodiest war mythology ever written - even bloodier than the Iliad which is entirely about a war. I guess you think when Jesus demanded the death of children who curse their parents that he was exhibiting "love" and "peace".
@fortmyersroyal If you think its so bloody why dont you pick up a bible and turn into a RANDOM page. I bet you 100 percent on your first second and third try there will be no bad influence or teaching on the bible. If the bible is the bloodiest book then the world must really be Nice and friendly. I also laughed at the clearly I have never read the bible. I think you never read the bible you athiest freak.
Boy, you are duplicitous. Apparently a book is only unworthy of the words "love" and "peace" when it has depravity on EVERY page. So, for you the pro-murder, pro-slavery, pro-tribalism, pro-xenophobia and pro-genocide are just banalities that the reader is to gloss over until the oh so obvious examples of love and peace make the rare appearance. Talk about casuistry.
@fortmyersroyal You didnt even flip 3 random pages yet, how can you say that when you didnt even flip 3 random pages. My first page was warning againts idols, second was Saul in jerusalem and third was warning to the rich. Read the bible becuase when you do read it you know there wont be murders and slavery on every page of the book, athiest takes everything about the bad things in the bible and mkaes them look worse and more severe like its a devils bible. I read one you should too.
@fortmyersroyal The thing I noticed most is that Athiest is the number one hazard to a christians life becuase athiest killed alot of christians which is MURDER, I sent you the link yesterday. Another part is that you said GENOCIDE when Christians since Jesus's times were blamed and accused to death and christians in the past were held to death camps and martyrs tortured. Lets not forget about Hitler stalin and those chinise athiest. Its the other way around bro and u fail to notice it.
I tried out your frivolous test by picking 3 random pages from Hitler's Mein Kampf, and what do you know? Those pages did not possess overt depravity. By your logic, Mein Kampf MUST be about "love" and "peace".
-
You should be ashamed of yourself for extolling a vulgar book of lies that pervasively encourages malice toward humans. One of two things must be true: 1) You didn't read the book. 2) You're a degenerate psychopath.
-
Btw, it's spelled "atheist". Of course, you knew that.
Hitler was Catholic, and while his religious views may not have contributed to his genocidal tendencies, there's no question that the Holocaust was made possible by the religious hatred stemming from Martin Luther's antisemitism, the 10 million Germans that died from the 30 years war and Hitler's concordant with the Vatican. Hitler stated as early as the summer of 1933 that he was doing Christianity a favor by restoring the practice of pushing Jews out of society.
The metaphysical status of murderers is irrelevant. There's as much evidence that Stalin murdered due to atheism as there is for him murdering because of his mustache.
-
Religion is one of a few things that can subvert one's innate ability to empathize. An absence of belief in god cannot do that.
-
Steven Weinberg said, "With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."
Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Chairman Mao. I guess as these guys were all atheists, and religion is the root of ALL evil - these guys must be the good guys. Yep, sounds smart to me...
Religion is the root of some evil. Athiesm is the root of more evil (more people have died.) This proves nothing either way.
@goldstead Actually people without faith do more evil. Look at the systems based on against-religion. Humans have a nature to be evil with faith or without it. However, if you do have a good faith, you can prevent that emerging. If you don't, you are only scared because of the law and consequences and that won't always stop people too.
If you want to learn about reality, the last thing you need is blind faith. Instead you need real tools, tools that science has developed over centuries by men who ignored the madness of deranged theists to chip away at the darkness and superstition to reveal the light.
No. Rationalist and atheists don't need evidence for their dismissal of all gods. We dismiss Zeus, Krishna, Baal, Ahura Mazda, Horus, Loki and Quetzalcoatl.
They're not the ones making outrageous and extraordinary claims, claims made in the absence of evidence and devoid of sound reason; theists are. We challenge this.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but these insane claims are why theists called this 'faith' right?
You are weak minded you haven't the strength to say there is no god and you haven't the integrity to get on your knees and worship your maker. You can keep your snide snivelling self justifications to yourself no one is buying your washed up superstition.
Actually, the nature of integrity is more akin to standing up for yourself and others, to demand good reason and evidence, and so on. To get on your knees and worship is more akin to acting like a credulous slave.
And apparently she does have the strength to say there is no god,.. because there she is saying it.
Leave it to the faithful to fall back on mindless rhetoric and deny what is right in front of them while insisting on the most unlikely prospects.
Keep it up you stupid ignorant moron, keep digging you imbecile. What do you imagine is happening? It's got nothing to do with reality and yet you keep on with your ignorant stupidity. Your petulance is amazing, your ignorance breathtaking. Come on mouth breather you can do it.
Along with religion you must include all laws, moral notions, political ideals, expressions of art and anything of meaning as all are purely subjective and can not be proven by science yet you devote as much of yourself to them as anyone who follows a religion yet you point fingers. Now explain your "reality"
That's fucking nonsense. The law is man made, it doesn't claim to live in a cloud and make buttercups. Morality is the study of proper behaviour as a human being, morality doesn't apply to animals or plants by it's nature it is subjective and the subject is humanity not some fairytale nonsense.
You have a problem with your reading skills. I clearly stated that the law is a work of Human reason not just being frightened by wind and inventing magic gods to "explain" ignorance,
Morality is the study of proper behaviour. You added your stupid notion of some magical ideal handed over by your "god". That isn't the way it works. You seem to have difficulty in dealing with things unless there is a little manual for it.
"I clearly stated that the law is a work of Human reason"
Human imagination and is as real as any deity. It exists by belief alone. Therefore it does not exist.
"Morality is the study of proper behaviour."
Proper behavior? What the hell is that?
Morality is as imaginary as any god. Like any value or meaning itself. Inventing ideals to justify your actions. It's all about your FEELINGS. Not logic. And you call others ignorant?
You need to get some remedial reading classes in, you are incapable of understanding the written word.
Morality (that's the name of the thing) is (indicating a definition of what Morality (is composed of) the study (the process of studying or investigating and codifying) of proper (Correct, admirable, appropriate) Human (to do with humanity, of humanity) behaviour (The way in which things are done).
You'll see no mention of magic ideals fixed laws, rules or edicts. You fucking blinkered idiot.
You don't understand the meaning of a quite considerable swath of words. You need to redefine the meaning of half the words in the english language for your ignorant and mindless half baked theorising to work.
In your imagination unless something is a piece of matter it does not exist which is both moronic and ironic.
You are wrong, your silly rules are nonsense and you can't to comprehend the english language. If you think the law and morality are so unreal try killling one of your neighbors.
"In your imagination unless something is a piece of matter it does not exist which is both moronic and ironic."
Like any god, it does not. If it is not physical it does not exist nor can it be proven to.
What happened to your supposed naturalistic view? You have abandoned it for imaginary nonsense? No one likes a hypocrite, at least be true to your beliefs.
You really need to know more about physics before you attempt to misrepresent it. You should really have some understanding of what information is. You have made a fool of yourself. If morality does not exist why is it being discussed. You claim it is imaginary, yet it is being imagined and therefore has existence and is as real as any planet. You really should think these things through.
So you don't understand morality and therefore you try to claim it doesn't exist because you can't find a morality particle in a physics handbook. Your partial education is not sufficient reason to make your remarks. You doubtless don't believe in philosophy, art, or justice either, that doesn't matter as your cognitive processes are impaired.
Oh well, atleast his name makes sense now—lots of evidence here.
willdrake1 3 months ago
why VS? why always war and fight? why all these false dilemmas?
zragisha 3 months ago
Awwww, why are all of @pompousprick's comments removed?
willdrake1 3 months ago
It's amazing how many 'independent thinkers' are jumping on the atheist train.
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
How is jumping on the same train instead of coming to the SAME LOGICAL CONCLUSION?
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
You're assuming alot...you know what that makes you right?
I mean, what arrogance to suggest you know the reasons for everyone's comments.
Also, just cause many people repeat the same/similar ideas or opinions, doesn't mean their "regurgitating": if that were true, no two people could every agree on anything—one would always have to be regurgitating the others opinion/idea, which is a false choice.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
Until you prove your all knowing insight into the reasons why people made the statements/videos they did, you're still assuming; you're doubling down on the concept that no two people can come to a same/similar idea, even if one later CHOOSES to go with the other persons more accepted way of explaining THEIR ideas/opinions. You're also saying, by totally agreeing with another person, somehow ALWAYS makes you a follower.
Lots of assumptions, I can tell you're not big on Science.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
"Oh yeah, they're all doing the research into various religions and really understanding those belief systems, examining the scientific conclusions and proposals with critical, thoughtful analysis, really considering their untenable naturalistic stance and coming to their own conclusion."
1) You're suggesting otherwise, which is to say, YOU KNOW the reasons why they're doing this: "content is endless regurgitation of the same old shit."
willdrake1 3 months ago
Respond to this video...
I don't have to show you where. Your arrogant assumptions and implicit statements, reek of your KNOWING their reasons for comments, ect. Don't deign it. Over and over again you SAY they're "endless regurgitation" which again and again goes to your issue: NO two people can think,agree upon the same thing. Ever. If they don't use theirown words to explain their opinions/ideas, they're brainwashed.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Respond to this video...
So, well, maybe you feel Religion is brainwashing too, lots of repetition there, regurgitation, borrowing of similar ideas to express underlining agreement.
IF NOT, your hypocrisy should become clear.
To suggest specific people, for specific reasons, don't apply critical thinking is one thing, but to say "It's amazing how many 'independent thinkers' are jumping on the atheist train" and other broad statements is a whole lot of assuming
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
1) NOT A LITERAL "TREE OF ALL KNOWING" you dumbass, I was making fun of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.
2) When a "believer" tries to suggest, what were once seen as divine historical accounts are now allegorical or metaphorical stories, necessary or not to their belief, it shows how logic exists though strangled so their brain doesn't cave-in.
3) If you're going to defend the existence of Eden, as is word-for-word believed by millions, well, I'll say good-bye.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
LOL REDNECK: How the hell did you grab that from you ass? I'm not a redneck, the idea is making me laugh so hard I'm crying.
Yes, the level of assumptions you make (not to be confused with a hypothesis: which comes from tried and tested data) goes against Science, so friend, well, I'm not the clown. I'm not the one whose been vomiting up all sorts of assumptions and wide sweeping assertions—no specific facts relative to persons in question, to show. That'd be you.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
That's right, talked into your corner, you bow out while assuming the high ground which isn't yielded.
W/e helps your little world go round`n`round.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
I think you should work on your reading comprehensions skills:
1) I didn't assume you were religions, I said, "...MAYBE you feel Religion is brainwashing too...IF NOT, your hypocrisy should become clear" I didn't even imply you were religions. I SUGGESTED, that perhaps, you held RELIGION to the same brainwashing standards, you hold these people here.
Let me know if finding a way to type in crayon will help you understand.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
I can tell, it was the crayon jab that's really sent you over, isn't it?
I don't think you know what "conflicting" or "hypocritical" means, since I've been neither.
The capitals were for your benefit, not mine—though, I don't want to bring up your reading issue again :)
Since when does one need to upload anything to comment on others? Ya, I thought so.
Again the redneck thing? Do you know what a redneck is? You can't if you think I'm one...sorry, laughing again.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
Thanks for your geo-resume, though I didn't ask or care, nor does it lend any particular weight to what you've said, accept, if its true redneck means 3 different things, suggests you should specify a particular meaning, if outside the most commonly known to anyone who knows who/what a redneck is.
I've also lived outside the US and have never heard it used other than is commonly known, but w/e.
willdrake1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Respond to this video...
Do you have a short-term memory issue too:
"I've come across your type before. The 'comment troll' patrolling the comments section of Youtube with an imagined intellectual authority, Not A Single Uploaded Video. Just open an account to show the world how clever you are."
Do you understand what this implies about people with videos vs those who don't?
The caps come and go as I feel you need help understanding. Tell me if you're having trouble again.
willdrake1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Respond to this video...
"Hypocritical, just look at your very first reply comment"
My first comment to your across the board assumption:
"How is that jumping on the same train instead of coming to the SAME LOGICAL CONCLUSION?"
That's hypocritical how?
My second comment, too long to repost, calls YOU out on your assumptions, the reply to my first post. Remember, all this started from your initial comment. That's all I've been talking about: You, based upon what you type.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
"Your first comment is a broad assumption..."
Are you kidding me?
1) You said: "It's amazing how many 'independent thinkers' are jumping on the atheist train."
2) I replied: "How is that jumping on the same train instead of coming to the SAME LOGICAL CONCLUSION?"
That's a question, not an assumption and not broad since I'm ASKING ONLY YOU based only upon what you said.Seriously, I hope people from your country are better educated. God you make me laugh.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
Respond to this video...
Finally you admit it: "Atheism requires zero thought."
So you are a believer, either of a particular dogma or some kinda theist.
Man, if you would've just admitted you have a problem with people who don't believe in God in the first place,
instead of saying "...it's funny. Assuming I am religious because I am critical of moron atheists like yourself deluded into believing they are actually thinkers because they are atheists," we could've skipped all this.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Respond to this video...
Lastly, just because you and your few friends use redneck in reference to Americans, well, doesn't really give the word other definitions in "the three English speaking countries you've lived in"—if you think it does, well, you're an idiot. Your personal, incorrect usage, confuses people, yes, those people you think agree with you; cause its retarded. If you want to group all Americans, a word already exists: Yank.
I'll write it in crayon, maybe then you'll remember.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Respond to this video...
Lastly, I've tried to find different meanings for redneck, but they don't seem to exist online.
So, either you're lying OR those other meanings, aren't really known to many people world wide; unless you can prove otherwise, I'd suggest you don't use it outside its meaning, cause you're only going to confuse others and make yourself look like a dumbass.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Respond to this video...
To the assertions you've yet to comment on:
Do you feel Religion is as much brainwashing as you think these Atheists are brainwashed?
If not, explain the difference in one group agreeing with/going along with—though they might've gotten there through different means—a single idea, for w/e reasons vs that from the other?
To be clear, cause I don't want to confuse you, I'm not assuming anything...this is just a question OK?
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
There's nothing wrong there (though maybe some people need commas to help them know how to pause when reading, to help them hold together one cohesive idea: classic literature hurts their little heads) but I see now, crayon is the only way to talk to you.
Let me see if Youtube has something we can use...
:)
willdrake1 3 months ago
Comment removed
pompousprick 3 months ago
@pompousprick
Wait, you're still confused and it seems Youtube doesn't have a crayon application...sorry.
Maybe if I get Crayola to team up with Youtube, hold on.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Like I said trying to prove or disprove the existence of a creator is futile and is not "sense" but nonsense. Only those that admit they don't know are being truthful with themselves.
futinc 6 months ago
Sorry, I meant intelligent, and what I was say before I was cut off, agnostics deserve the respect.
futinc 7 months ago
@hobokombat
Yes, I openly admit my ignorance, as will most any truly inelegant person, case in point I just finished watching a few episodes of "through the wormhole" and the greatest minds on the planet all say they have no idea what holds the universe together, in fact, the more we discover, the more we realize the magnitude of information we don't understand. While I may consider an atheist to be a fool, I consider someone that claims they understand God to be even more foolish. Agnostics r
futinc 7 months ago
@futinc
Agnostic is really an Atheist.
1) Agnostic answers the question, "Is there a God" with I don't know.
2) Atheists answer the question, "Do you believe in God" with, No.
If you're not sure theirs a God, you can't say you believe in God and if you don't believe in God, whether its from not knowing or just cause, than your an Atheist, atleast until proven otherwise.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Respond to this video...
Also, not knowing all the ins and outs of the forcing (Gravity, the S/T Nuclear Forces, Electromagnetism) making up the known universe and reality, doesn't mean you're willing to superimpose some man mad belief in its place—it simply means, we haven't gotten there yet; but that's a far cry from two people in paradise, a talking snake and a tree of all knowing b.s.
willdrake1 3 months ago
Yes but ask any child if there is a God or not and they'll say there is. Creation is all the proof I need. A fool has said in his heart, "There is no God."
futinc 7 months ago
@futinc
Fantastic point, and very telling of the intellectual standards so many religious people have set for themselves: a worldview supported by a child is sufficient evidence for any supernatural belief.
Bravo, at least you're honest about your willful ignorance.
hobokombat 7 months ago
@futinc - talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish
GodsArePeopleToo 6 months ago
@futinc
A child could only say there is/isn't a God, if he/she knows what God is; and if he/she knows what God is, they've already been exposed to one opinion or another of his existence—like more for the positive; however, if you find a child who has no concept of God, he/she will either say NO or ask "What is God"
willdrake1 3 months ago
Religion as practiced in western society has been twisted around throughout history, and now has become something so ambiguously preached as to have everyone interpret it their own way. The real source of religion lies beyond any conceptual apprehension. It is truly a higher state of consciousness which the ego is the veil or hindrance from this realization. There's many paths to this experience, i.e. meditation, a near-death-experience, psychedelics taken at high doses, etc. Many paths, 1truth.
Hanahleia 7 months ago
Somehow you went from average till hot as hell from the start of your video till the end of it. Must be magic.
party489 9 months ago
I like to think of yourself as a cute girl.
see what I did there? :P
alexicoff 10 months ago
slut
Chansulus 10 months ago
you are the hottest atheist I know :)
leeidoc 10 months ago
@leeidoc
No doubt. Would love to hook up with her and help make atheist babies so the planets IQ could evolve to higher levels, like my manhood when she's on the screen.
19nisey69 10 months ago
Science has no facts,as most of them are proven wrong,whether they only state it as a change and not a correction,makes no sense and proves pure ignorance.all of science is a theory,and as such it remains.Science is blind faith,for a atheist believes all that they say,having not seen it there self,nor having any facts to prove it,just theory's.A atheist is lost,do not bother with them,they will only hurt u,for there souls grief,that's why they watch these vids.to try and validate there emptiness
wisdomlifeknowledge 1 year ago
@wisdomlifeknowledge
Suggest you pickup a book, specificlly "The World of Physics" published 1987, Volume III, some where between pages 600 to 700, there is a 20 page essay on what a scientific theroy is, you need to learn this. Sorry, I can't narrow it down any more, but, its been a while since I read it.
Others may have more recent sources.
bigfatbaataed 11 months ago
@wisdomlifeknowledge I never thought about it that way. You're totally right! Thanks, bro.
ginotech 10 months ago
@wisdomlifeknowledge
"Science has no facts, as most of them are proven wrong"
Wow!
I mean, because such a sentence makes my head hurt...I don't know what to say nor could I be sure you'd understand it.
willdrake1 3 months ago
ALL YOU ATHIESTS ARE TRYING TO DO IS FIND EVIDENCE OF A GOD THAT DOES NOT NOT LIVE HERE, GIVE UP, what do you expect a lock of gods hair, is that enouph proof, no, okay, how bout a tooth, are you serious, what kind of evidence do you need, the only evidence i have is geology and races and prophecy, mainly prophecy is literal proof
doyce1000 1 year ago
@doyce1000 Burden of proof does not lie with the atheists. It's not them who make all those outrageous claims.
Plopkap 1 year ago
@doyce1000
Wow, you are very dumb. Seriously. You have been brainwashed believing science is bad. Your parents were obviouslt not critical thinkers, neither are you, and hopefully the chain of ignorance ends with you.
19nisey69 10 months ago
@19nisey69 what kind of evidence do you need? seriously, and just because you dont believe in him it doesnt mean he isnt up there mad at you, god said the wicked and adultress generation seeks after a sign, and there will be none, but if you want god to reveal himself, youll get your wish, you ever read revelation, and plus not everyone is chosen for heaven, only the good people, which im not even part of, so if you can go to heaven, i would take gods offer
doyce1000 10 months ago
@doyce1000
"prophecy is literal proof"
People like you scare me.
willdrake1 3 months ago
You can give all the facts and truths you want, show how things work, give logical explanations, but it will never be enough to a person that wants to believe. How sad is that? Just like a child that wants their way and refuses to listen. Sure you can listen to a religious person, but they come up short on answers to your questions. God is not an answer, we dont even know what that is or if it is at all.
omhealer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Satan HATES God & wants as many people as he can get to turn against God so he can destroy their souls .Satan knows he's going to lose his war with God & he's really worried about that - don't fall victim to Satan, rebuke Satan & all evil outloud~!!! Seek Christ, through Him seek your redemption before God - pray and repent; confess your sins to God through Christ and beg God's forgiveness for your sins to obtain your salvation~! Fight Satan with Christ~! Prepare your soul as the end is upon us!
GERENDAZEE 1 year ago
A harder shell has been introduced into the population making them harder to break open. Inevitably this causes them to become more successful and the softer ones will eventually disappear because they will be consumed.
Relativisticism 1 year ago
Some traits can be productive and others can be detrimental to the organism. Yet others can change the species but neither effect it positively or negatively. Dogs are a great example of evolution but not the only evidence. Sand dollars are another great example of evolution at work. Just in the past 20 years we have seen a drastic change in the sand dollar. Probably due to the over abundant predators who feed on the eggs.
Relativisticism 1 year ago
Check out the "facts"science gives on several matters, you will find much of it is unproofable, weakly supported faith.
daddyg321 1 year ago
@daddyg321"the "facts"science gives on several matters, you will find much of it is unproofable, weakly supported faith."
That is what you have to keep telling yourself so you can feel right about clouding your mind with nonsense? Science ALWAYS offers testable models before it is accepted by the community at large. Generally if it is not falsifiable it's not science.
Relativisticism 1 year ago
@Relativisticism I was a science major and now work in electronics, I remember climatgate, and the coming new ice age in the '70s. These were testable proofable models?Please show the test model for the THEORY of evolution.
daddyg321 1 year ago
@daddyg321 science major eh? hmm you must have skipped high school biology then? A simple model is the canine model. Granted that humans drive the traits due to selective breeding of traits that humans find desirable, where as in normal evolution survival drives the process, although NOT exclusively. Genes are basically the driving force behind evolution. Certain genes can become dormant or recessive, however not completely lost. (cont)
Relativisticism 1 year ago
@Relativisticism So what did they turn dogs into, or turn what into dogs?
daddyg321 1 year ago
@daddyg321 dogs were/are originally wolves, but through selective breeding they became more docile than wolves. The point being, look at how many traits that dogs have, size, shape, color, intelligence, stamina, speed, strength. You get all of those traits due to gene activation. We are no different and any it can happen within any species.
Relativisticism 1 year ago
@Relativisticism Canines are canines, like all animals they have variation, but I have still never heard of a canine being turned into anything but a canine.
daddyg321 1 year ago
@daddyg321 well actually your statement is convoluted because you are expecting that a species need drastically change into another species, which does not happen in one generation. So you will never witness a canine actually become something else because the process is gradual spanning probably thousands of generations. All species are transitional species, but the definition they hold is what people get caught on assuming they are 'set' and unchanging. The are far from unchanging.
Relativisticism 1 year ago
@Relativisticism I know science and I know you still haven't answered my question,and never will. Again prove an animal became another animal, not a variation of the same animal.
daddyg321 1 year ago
@daddyg321 it is written in the genetic code of all species of what their predecessors were before them.
Relativisticism 1 year ago
@daddyg321
"I know science"
You know science?
That's an odd way for an educated adult to phrase it.
You evidently know nothing about biology, or you would not make such ignorant statements as "an animal became another animal."
Evolution never says anything like that.
At no point does one animal become another animal.
I don't think your claim to "know science" is true.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Imaginefree69 And again atheist opinion is implied to be indisputable fact. Hows that hold up in a lab?
daddyg321 1 year ago
@daddyg321
"anything but a canine"
We are vastly different from the species from which we evolved.
You, like so many others who know almost enough about biology to make gaping, absurd errors, seem to expect gross changes in common species during your short lifetime within this period of environmental stability.
That's not how it works.
We do see evolution in a human-friendly time span when we observe vastly changed environments, such as new bacteria which live on hospital cleaning products.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@daddyg321
Part 2
Are you not aware of WHY we have been unable to produce an effective vaccine against HIV?
It's because the virus is mutating (evolving) so rapidly that by the time one vaccine is created there are dozens (at least) of NEW varieties so different that the veccine-educated immune system cannot recognize them as the target organism!
Yes, sir, you are watching evolution in action.
And the current environmental changes will accelerate evolution globally.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@daddyg321
"I was a science major"
I doubt that.
Science majors don't talk about "proofable models" and "unproofable" and "the facts science gives."
And those who have studied evolution do not attack it; especially with the ignorant arguments you are using. I believe the evidence, daddy, and the evidence strongly suggests that you are a lying poseur.
No, you never studied any kind of science.
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
so religion is real because they say so wow thats fucked up
oscar2034 1 year ago
@oscar2034 - MAN!!!!!!!!!
Youngl3lood 1 year ago
Continuing with Hitler, it is believed that his speeches hypnotised people to do his bidding. Scary to think, but plausible. Also, the way he used rhetoric put the Jews in such a bad light it was easy for everyone to hate them. The reason Hitler failed was becase he tried to take as much land as soon as possible. Once he invaded Poland, he lost the chance of gaining all the land he wanted through appeasement. War began and he stabbed ally Russia in the back. Truly an insane individual.
MFLuder77 1 year ago
@MFLuder77 Hitler's plan, from the beginning, always was to get liebensraum in the east. Read Mein Kampf. Also, Hitler only made a pact with Stalin so he wouldn,t have to worry about fighing on 2 fronts, like in WWI. After realizing that Britain wouldn't fall, he decided it was time to apply his original plan: Get the lands of the USSR and get rid of the bocheviks and the Jews, wich he thought, were the same.
caporalchef4 1 year ago
@caporalchef4
How does Hitler's plan relate to the topic of "Fact vs Faith"?
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@Imaginefree69 Are you going around, looking for my comments to troll me or pick a fight, you fuckin looser?!! LOL!!! Didn't momy and dady give you enough attention when you were a child? you're pathetic, get life! Don't even bother replying, I don't have time to waste with your self-gratifying childish games. you call yourself an educated adult? You might be educated but you certainly don't act like amature adult, boy.
caporalchef4 1 year ago
Comment removed
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@caporalchef4
I would rather NOT encounter your irrelevant spam, but you see to be posting it everywhere I go.
I note that once again you have chosen to attack me in a personal way rather than be adult enough to either defend or withdraw your irrelevant little sermon about Hitler's plans.
At least you're consistent.
I'll make you a deal-
you stop posting irrelevant trash and I'll stop pointing out that it's irrelevant trash.
Even a six-year -old should be able to understand that deal.
Do you?
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
@caporalchef4
Hitler was a Christian and thought that by killing Jews he was serving the god of the Bible.
*sigh*
Serving that god always seems to involve killing someone.
Why is that?
Imaginefree69 1 year ago 2
@Imaginefree69 Yeah, i'll make you a deal: Go fuck your mother!! Who the hell do you think you are, smart ass?? My reply was for someone who had it all wrong with WWII facts, and it was none of your goddamn business to know why I wrote my comment. So you can take your contempt for me and shove it far up your pipe. I'll post whatever and wherever the fuck I want. You don't like it, well, ignore it and we'll be all just fine, asshole.
caporalchef4 1 year ago
Hitler's did have race hate and hate of other religions. However, his prime directive was not to simply kill off everyone he didn't like; it was world domination. The superior Aryian race was only a side fantasy of his from his delusional mind. But his plan was ingenious at the start: Take advantage of the poverty of germany, rise to power by raising hopes, convince them that rich Jews were to blame for all their hardship, go to war with the people who oppressed them (the one's who won WWI).
MFLuder77 1 year ago
Religion was not the cause of the Crusades. It was merely a tactic for Europe to make people fight for them. In actuality, they were fought to get control of the trade routes which went through the Middle East. Europe didn't want to deal with the "Middle Man" anymore to get stuff from China. How do you convince small minded people to fight for you? Say that the Middle Easterns have a corrupt religion and in the name of Christ we must attack. Religion: not the cause of war, but the cover up.
MFLuder77 1 year ago
I love you
TheCrimsonRift 1 year ago
You are suggesting:
If the answer to any question demands a leap of faith, it is not an answer.
It seems to me that the statement is self refuting.
If I ask why, you should give me a good reason on why that's the true, or do I need a leap of faith to believe it?
naujphantom 1 year ago
@naujphantom I don't think that's the suggestion. I think that leap of faith happens when, you continue to believe, despite the obvious flaws and errors in the thing that's being believed. In this case, god and the bible. With all the errors and lack of ANY physical evidence to prove any biblical story, but to still blindly believe, is a leap of faith.
tommy605 1 year ago
@tommy605 Well, I have a different understanding of faith.
You say: to continue to believe despite the opposition to your believe.
That's ok, but also: To continue to believe despite the lack of evidence to support your believe.
If we don't add the last, then there is no need of faith to believe in God (not the God of the bible, just the general idea) since nothing oppose.
Then if we need support to believe without faith, my point form the other post remains.
naujphantom 1 year ago
Whe GOD unleashed the Universed, i was there. When He started creating the world, I was there. And when He was working the trees and rocks and lakes and plants, I was there to see it.
Airlightf 1 year ago
What I find interesting is that athiests also have the need to get together to "share"their experience with each other. Dawkins just finished a tour here recently,addressing athiests in each city. looks a little like they're developing the need to congregate. No shame in it,we were created with a spiritual need.
Copsweet 1 year ago
cute,she looks like 19 or 20 but she is actually over 30 i think
hovsec 2 years ago
Don't play in the rain...well, if i were you, ill just play...and see whats the outcome of it! if u get sick, then, thats for not listening to an advice...then find out the reason why u got sick...i mean, thats a whole lotta facts a kid need to know why you fall sick, if ure talking about how viruses, immune system etc works...so...just dont play! and be a good girl! :D
son4t4 2 years ago
wow, if Larry says it aint real, then I guess it aint real!
helpmetony 2 years ago
Jesus is the only way!!!
CatholicGuy22 2 years ago
@CatholicGuy22 Now even you can see that's wrong.
MrLemex 2 years ago
@CatholicGuy22
No , it's not.
rattlehead66666 1 year ago
i ask and urge you all to serach Lawrence Krauss AAI 2009 on youtube. His lecture basically explains how the universe comes from nothing, how scientists KNOW it comes from nothing, and it tell you just how insignificant we all are.
drummeruptheirons 2 years ago 11
she makes a good point
believe what is fed to you
dannywalton 2 years ago
I don't care what u fags think I feel like my cursed life is a test so I only wish I could believe but sadly I can't so enjoy ur lifes human beings
killsanity 2 years ago
I can ask how did the universe come to be? And a physicist would tell you big bang, you ask how did that occur? He answers with a scientific theory, then you ask ... Ooo so you don't really know?
God creating the universe is just as valid as the big bang theory because we will never, ever know. And if there is a God then he can tell us how it did happen.
strongfp 2 years ago
Atleast the scientists admit that its just a THEORY and not a fact. While you religious people state your beliefs as fact.
Jawattdenn 2 years ago
A scientific theory is essentially fact, it is a hypothesis that has been tested evaluated
ZK3525 2 years ago 2
The problem is that you cannot really evaluate theories. Ok you might test your theory 1000 times, but it still might fail the 1001 time. While on the other hand 1 single fail is proof that the theory is invalid. You can exclude theories, but even if you only focus on theories you couldn't exclude yet doesn't mean you can't exclude them in the future.
Jawattdenn 2 years ago
You obviously haven't taken a peek at my profile...
The bottom line is, the big bang was a one time event, a singularity. God creating the universe is a singularity as well, something we will never know and never will find out. By time the universe dies or contracts or what ever it does, us humans as a race would most likely become extinct. BUT if there is a God, and he is true, then that is our only way to really find out.
strongfp 2 years ago
Comment removed
rmcdaniel423 2 years ago
@strongfp
Try as I might, I cannot make sense of anything you wrote. Can you reword that?
giggletronics 2 years ago
No it isn't. Moron.
JustBrowsing219 2 years ago
@JustBrowsing219.
Ok. How so? Smartass.
strongfp 2 years ago
Oh God! You Devil.... "Ever seen a top without a bottom? Ever seen a back without a front? Ever seen a left without a right? Then you most certaintly never have seen a Good without Evil. "No wonder regligion behaves like evil doers at times"!
alwerks1 2 years ago
DEATH TO CHRISTIANITY!
Vektruscen 2 years ago 2
Thank you for doing what you are doing, forget about the narrow minded naggers.
NHFandHFP 2 years ago 3
Thsi girl is sexy shit
ZonTheDon 2 years ago
I must say I'm amazed by the shallow arguments presented here. Religion is a polemic concept, a lumping together of elements that have nothing in to do with each other. Any statement on 'religion' is therefore bollocks; religion is everything here stated and more, it is both healthy and unhealthy, pathological and a curitive, sane and insane, regressive and progressive; the term is simply too broad to state anything about unambiguously.
Gottlichesalitter 2 years ago
I'm not sure I entirely agree with that. As all religions share a prime universally common trait, (belief in lack of evidence i.e 'faith') most can be generalized in conversation and debate. Such as the recurring chain of religious extinctions. The ancient pantheistic religions to the fading Mormonism and fundamentalist Christianity.
NHFandHFP 2 years ago 2
Faith is stupid.
viathor 2 years ago
Faith is irrational.
shota777 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what happens when you get tired of your tattoo?
Or when you don't get the job, or when people avoid you?
ukidding 2 years ago
then nothing.
if you don't get a job because of a freaking tattoo or people start to avoid you it's their fucking fault to be so close minded
Acrochordus 2 years ago
But you still don't have a job, and they'll be high and dry ;)
megamarsvin 2 years ago
RELIGION (ALL) = FRAUD. Religion is the root of ALL evil and the cause of current and most past wars
RELIGION = Apartheid, separateness, us Vs them.
RELIGION distorts logic and trains people to believe in the supernatural and blur their sense of reality.
The world needs to consign religion to history. How can any half-intelligent person believe in miracles, virgin birth, angels, afterlife with the imaginary boss? Just mythical, evil nonsense.
goldstead 2 years ago 14
Well put.
AnonEggman 2 years ago
Evil? I wouldn't go that far, wow.
It's definitely an agent of control, tho. That, and it's useless to practice today. We no longer need to pray for rain to extinguish fires while there's a firehouse nearby.
Efferts 2 years ago
@goldstead You are a complete moron.
TheEddymunster 1 year ago
@goldstead you have never been more wrong. Religion is not the root of all evil. Its not even evil at all. the bible tells all about Love faith peace and god. Its the people who are evil. people like you and me fight to show which side is real and prove that. I prove that god is real and you prove that he isnt. A conflict was invovled just like times before. Religion didnt make people that way, their descisions did.
flamer41 1 year ago
@flamer41
Good grief, what a fatuous statement that is. Clearly you have never read the bible. It's the bloodiest war mythology ever written - even bloodier than the Iliad which is entirely about a war. I guess you think when Jesus demanded the death of children who curse their parents that he was exhibiting "love" and "peace".
fortmyersroyal 1 year ago
@fortmyersroyal watch?v=YmqPGkDR0TQ How was it the bloodiest book ever?
flamer41 1 year ago
@fortmyersroyal If you think its so bloody why dont you pick up a bible and turn into a RANDOM page. I bet you 100 percent on your first second and third try there will be no bad influence or teaching on the bible. If the bible is the bloodiest book then the world must really be Nice and friendly. I also laughed at the clearly I have never read the bible. I think you never read the bible you athiest freak.
flamer41 1 year ago
@flamer41
Boy, you are duplicitous. Apparently a book is only unworthy of the words "love" and "peace" when it has depravity on EVERY page. So, for you the pro-murder, pro-slavery, pro-tribalism, pro-xenophobia and pro-genocide are just banalities that the reader is to gloss over until the oh so obvious examples of love and peace make the rare appearance. Talk about casuistry.
fortmyersroyal 1 year ago
@fortmyersroyal You didnt even flip 3 random pages yet, how can you say that when you didnt even flip 3 random pages. My first page was warning againts idols, second was Saul in jerusalem and third was warning to the rich. Read the bible becuase when you do read it you know there wont be murders and slavery on every page of the book, athiest takes everything about the bad things in the bible and mkaes them look worse and more severe like its a devils bible. I read one you should too.
flamer41 1 year ago
@fortmyersroyal The thing I noticed most is that Athiest is the number one hazard to a christians life becuase athiest killed alot of christians which is MURDER, I sent you the link yesterday. Another part is that you said GENOCIDE when Christians since Jesus's times were blamed and accused to death and christians in the past were held to death camps and martyrs tortured. Lets not forget about Hitler stalin and those chinise athiest. Its the other way around bro and u fail to notice it.
flamer41 1 year ago
@flamer41
I tried out your frivolous test by picking 3 random pages from Hitler's Mein Kampf, and what do you know? Those pages did not possess overt depravity. By your logic, Mein Kampf MUST be about "love" and "peace".
-
You should be ashamed of yourself for extolling a vulgar book of lies that pervasively encourages malice toward humans. One of two things must be true: 1) You didn't read the book. 2) You're a degenerate psychopath.
-
Btw, it's spelled "atheist". Of course, you knew that.
fortmyersroyal 1 year ago
@flamer41
Hitler was Catholic, and while his religious views may not have contributed to his genocidal tendencies, there's no question that the Holocaust was made possible by the religious hatred stemming from Martin Luther's antisemitism, the 10 million Germans that died from the 30 years war and Hitler's concordant with the Vatican. Hitler stated as early as the summer of 1933 that he was doing Christianity a favor by restoring the practice of pushing Jews out of society.
fortmyersroyal 1 year ago
@flamer41
The metaphysical status of murderers is irrelevant. There's as much evidence that Stalin murdered due to atheism as there is for him murdering because of his mustache.
-
Religion is one of a few things that can subvert one's innate ability to empathize. An absence of belief in god cannot do that.
-
Steven Weinberg said, "With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."
fortmyersroyal 1 year ago
@goldstead
Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Chairman Mao. I guess as these guys were all atheists, and religion is the root of ALL evil - these guys must be the good guys. Yep, sounds smart to me...
Religion is the root of some evil. Athiesm is the root of more evil (more people have died.) This proves nothing either way.
rozzerallen 1 year ago
@goldstead Actually people without faith do more evil. Look at the systems based on against-religion. Humans have a nature to be evil with faith or without it. However, if you do have a good faith, you can prevent that emerging. If you don't, you are only scared because of the law and consequences and that won't always stop people too.
kahraman 8 months ago
very very cute!! sweet voice
Vlorun 2 years ago
If you want to learn about reality, the last thing you need is blind faith. Instead you need real tools, tools that science has developed over centuries by men who ignored the madness of deranged theists to chip away at the darkness and superstition to reveal the light.
sgm2005fu 2 years ago
No. Rationalist and atheists don't need evidence for their dismissal of all gods. We dismiss Zeus, Krishna, Baal, Ahura Mazda, Horus, Loki and Quetzalcoatl.
They're not the ones making outrageous and extraordinary claims, claims made in the absence of evidence and devoid of sound reason; theists are. We challenge this.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but these insane claims are why theists called this 'faith' right?
sgm2005 2 years ago
You are weak minded you haven't the strength to say there is no god and you haven't the integrity to get on your knees and worship your maker. You can keep your snide snivelling self justifications to yourself no one is buying your washed up superstition.
Cretin.
nilbud 2 years ago
Actually, the nature of integrity is more akin to standing up for yourself and others, to demand good reason and evidence, and so on. To get on your knees and worship is more akin to acting like a credulous slave.
And apparently she does have the strength to say there is no god,.. because there she is saying it.
Leave it to the faithful to fall back on mindless rhetoric and deny what is right in front of them while insisting on the most unlikely prospects.
analubalitious 2 years ago
Fuck off you moron, you can't even read.
nilbud 2 years ago
There you have it folks. nilbud doing Jesus proud with ad hominem attacks via profanity. Now that's Christian.
analubalitious 2 years ago
As I pointed out before you inbred moron, you cannot even read. You fucking stupid cunt.
nilbud 2 years ago
That's the spirit! More profane ad hominem attacks!
No, don't address any of the content of the arguments and points, that would be counter to faith.
The behavior of people like you speaks for itself.
analubalitious 2 years ago
Keep it up you stupid ignorant moron, keep digging you imbecile. What do you imagine is happening? It's got nothing to do with reality and yet you keep on with your ignorant stupidity. Your petulance is amazing, your ignorance breathtaking. Come on mouth breather you can do it.
nilbud 2 years ago
depends on what type of reality you want.
Accurate type of reality: try science
Unrealistic type of reality: try religion.
ukidding 2 years ago 2
"Unrealistic type of reality: try religion."
Along with religion you must include all laws, moral notions, political ideals, expressions of art and anything of meaning as all are purely subjective and can not be proven by science yet you devote as much of yourself to them as anyone who follows a religion yet you point fingers. Now explain your "reality"
Twicebakedtaters 2 years ago
That's fucking nonsense. The law is man made, it doesn't claim to live in a cloud and make buttercups. Morality is the study of proper behaviour as a human being, morality doesn't apply to animals or plants by it's nature it is subjective and the subject is humanity not some fairytale nonsense.
nilbud 2 years ago
"That's fucking nonsense. The law is man made"
Yes, the law is nonsense. As imaginary as any notion of a god. All imaginary ideals that rule people.
"Morality is the study of proper behaviour"
According to who's imaginary ideal?
Morality is subjective imaginary notion of an ideal that does not exist physically exist just like any deity.
Twicebakedtaters 2 years ago
You have a problem with your reading skills. I clearly stated that the law is a work of Human reason not just being frightened by wind and inventing magic gods to "explain" ignorance,
Morality is the study of proper behaviour. You added your stupid notion of some magical ideal handed over by your "god". That isn't the way it works. You seem to have difficulty in dealing with things unless there is a little manual for it.
nilbud 2 years ago
"You have a problem with your reading skills."
Not at all.
"I clearly stated that the law is a work of Human reason"
Human imagination and is as real as any deity. It exists by belief alone. Therefore it does not exist.
"Morality is the study of proper behaviour."
Proper behavior? What the hell is that?
Morality is as imaginary as any god. Like any value or meaning itself. Inventing ideals to justify your actions. It's all about your FEELINGS. Not logic. And you call others ignorant?
Twicebakedtaters 2 years ago
"You added your stupid notion of some magical ideal handed over by your "god""
The only thing handed to me was the ability to think for myself.
Now tell me again about how REAL morals are. lol
There exist physical causal effect interactions.
They have physical properties. Morality is not one of them. Nor is meaning. Nor do they possess the physical property of value.
Put your imagination down and step away from the spaghetti monsters.
Twicebakedtaters 2 years ago
You need to get some remedial reading classes in, you are incapable of understanding the written word.
Morality (that's the name of the thing) is (indicating a definition of what Morality (is composed of) the study (the process of studying or investigating and codifying) of proper (Correct, admirable, appropriate) Human (to do with humanity, of humanity) behaviour (The way in which things are done).
You'll see no mention of magic ideals fixed laws, rules or edicts. You fucking blinkered idiot.
nilbud 2 years ago
"Correct, admirable, appropriate"
These are subjective. They are not physical properties and do not exist.
"behaviour"
Is explained completely by chemistry and natural physical causal effect interactions. There is no need for imaginary explanations.
"Correct, admirable, appropriate" are imaginary constructs. They do not physically exist. Yet you cling to them religulously.
Twicebakedtaters 2 years ago
You don't understand the meaning of a quite considerable swath of words. You need to redefine the meaning of half the words in the english language for your ignorant and mindless half baked theorising to work.
In your imagination unless something is a piece of matter it does not exist which is both moronic and ironic.
You are wrong, your silly rules are nonsense and you can't to comprehend the english language. If you think the law and morality are so unreal try killling one of your neighbors.
nilbud 2 years ago
"In your imagination unless something is a piece of matter it does not exist which is both moronic and ironic."
Like any god, it does not. If it is not physical it does not exist nor can it be proven to.
What happened to your supposed naturalistic view? You have abandoned it for imaginary nonsense? No one likes a hypocrite, at least be true to your beliefs.
Twicebakedtaters 2 years ago
You really need to know more about physics before you attempt to misrepresent it. You should really have some understanding of what information is. You have made a fool of yourself. If morality does not exist why is it being discussed. You claim it is imaginary, yet it is being imagined and therefore has existence and is as real as any planet. You really should think these things through.
nilbud 2 years ago
"If morality does not exist why is it being discussed."
Peter pan does not exist but that does not stop people from discussing it. Lets apply your silly rule to deities now shall we? Quite illogical.
"yet it is being imagined and therefore has existence and is as real as any planet."
So now anything we can imagine is real.
Put your spaghetti monster away now, play time is over.
Twicebakedtaters 2 years ago
So you don't understand morality and therefore you try to claim it doesn't exist because you can't find a morality particle in a physics handbook. Your partial education is not sufficient reason to make your remarks. You doubtless don't believe in philosophy, art, or justice either, that doesn't matter as your cognitive processes are impaired.
nilbud 2 years ago
"So you don't understand morality"
Yes, It is belief. That is why there are moral arguments because there exist no moral facts.
"Your partial education"
You mean my disagreement with your beliefs.
"You doubtless don't believe in philosophy, art, or justice either, "
No more than I believe in deities.
Twicebakedtaters 2 years ago
By your own admission then you are a psychopath.
nilbud 2 years ago
"By your own admission"
I am a free thinker.
Twicebakedtaters 2 years ago