NLP. M.Erickson-Explorer In Hypnosis(http://pualib.com/video)(5/6)

[Cruitheach]

As a means of comparison Erickson had his strange pecadilloes, but murder wasn't one of them to the best of my knowledge.

Furthermore, Stephen Brooks has developed Erickson's techniques more cogently than a certain aforementioned individual

[WKFyler1]

aepaepaepaepaepaep7 10 months ago Проблема в том Мильтон имеет очень широкий лексикон слов, (он читал стандартный словарь несколько раз в юности) и сознательно использует ambigious слова, или неправильно произносит их, чтобы вызвать скрытых договоренностей.

[gekiryudojo]

Thank you for uploading this I have been studying Erickson since 1993 and this is the first time I heard him! thanks!

[ga8866]

I think it is not to decide who is the best...and it doesnt even matter.

It`s interesting, that it seems like everybody, even the first student generation of Erickson, developed different views of his work.

Look at Zweig, Haley, Gilligian and even on Bandler.

I think what Bandler is doing is his approach or his understanding of what Erickson was doing.

So you cant tell...read the source, the Erickson books by Erickson and Zeig and then compare with Bandler et al.

[BananaSandwich1]

no bandler is better right now bcos milton is dead

[aepaepaepaepaepaep7]

плохие субтитры - во многих местах он слова которым бы следовало звучать переменяет на иные, а иногда пропускает эти ненужные to the и пр. для восттановления слушателем

[aepaepaepaepaepaep7]

@aepaepaepaepaepaep7

грустно что это малкому понятно - великийц мастер - а достойных учеников нету нихуя - долбоебвы обни

[400timesmore]

Erickson is so good at conversational hypnosis that they still haven't figured out what he's actually doing. This man was born to hypnotize people through his voice.

[clapdrix72]

Erickson has the most serene, hypnotizing timber and tone to his voice i've ever heard. I go into a trance the moment I hear it

[snowbizznz]

I have never seen anyone with his skills after 10 years of searching. He was the original and only master of the metaphor in hypnosis.

[JonChase]

Ericson was an average hypnotist and a so so psychologist but he was on page 5 when the rest of the world was on page 3 so he looked to those around him like a God.

We're on page 20 now and it's about time we let him lie.

[snowbizznz]

rubbish

[AdamsTeinz]

@snowbizznz what do you think is rubbish there? I'd say that it's a little demonstration of his amazing skills. He could accustom to everyone's feeling, he made hypnosis famous, and even if you believe in hypnosis or not (that is completely your opinion and I don't want to alter it), it is said that those who need it can have big use of hypnosis

[PhobiaGuy]

@snowbizznz i wonder if youve begun to realise yet, how oblivious you are to this mans genius?

[lggriffin]

Erickson was not an average hypnotist, but he may indeed be considered an average hypno-marketeer under today's standards! If the chapter on your page 20, starts with the heading; "How Grandiose Charlatans Market Their Own Hypnosis Courses On Youtube', then I would concur with you that we are definitely there!

[HowToHypnotizeVideos]

Erickson was to hypnosis what Albert Einstein was to physics.

[f0rger2]

What B&G did was very good. They did make it possible for many therapists to be able to use techniques of Erickson. No question. Thank you B&D! But that's it. B or D themselves did not/do not have anywhere close to the skills that M.E. had or that many therapists that are alive today have. The very good ones, the ones most like M.E., do not promote themselves the way B & D do, but then they dont need to tell everyone how good they are... its obvious to their peers.

[f0rger2]

Google Richard Bandler. Dont take my word on it and at the same time dont listen to the NLPers, just read the facts and make up YOUR mind. And if that doesnt convince you, check out any of Bandler's later videos because that is the guy you are saying is currently the best.

[f0rger2]

Are you nuts or just mistaken? Erickson was amazing, Bandler and Grinder write books, how can you possibly compare the two? You need to do some better research on who you think the best is currently.

[haris000000]

@f0rger2 um badler is curently bettr than miltoever was in part cuz he had miltons work as a foudation with whihhecould achieve more than milton ever did -natural progresion

[storkart]

@f0rger2 I think that biggest mistake is to compare Milton Erickson books to Grinder and Bandler books. Ofcourse you will know why if you read them all. :)

[terransage]

I recommend reading a book called "Uncommon Therapy," by Jay Haley. It's about some of Erickson's case histories, which are pretty amazing. Erickson was a genius who tailored his therapy for each patient. He seemed able to intuit exactly what they needed. The case histories read like short stories. I remember reading some of them to a friend, and he wanted me to keep going.

[LeeDH22]

And if you enjoyed "Uncommon Therapy" you will also like "My Voice Will Go With You".

[xjungfreud]

The very best

[DAH210774]

Indeed. One of my idols!!