I take back my defense of this potential energy - the case for its existence seems more a specious filler for balancing gravitational equations, not one based on evidence.
Dark matter is 10 to the 25th power gram blackholes. Dark energy is the Gravitational field the the EVent Horizon behind the Cosic microwave Back ground radiation.
"There's no great mystery about (dark particles); it's just the question of detecting them, finding out exactly what they are, and finding out how they fit into our basic, standard model of particle physics."
Um, that sounds like a big mystery to me. Maybe dark matter is permanently opaque and thus cannot be illuminated and is permeable to most forms of radio detection.
And yet, we can see, we can visualize the ethereal matter. The scheme to one device for to visualize the ethereal matter: EXIST! And this device it can realize!
The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.
The GRAVITY’s PARTICLES as aproximately the smallest ethereal particles, constitute the most general ethereal aggregation state from nature, with the largest temperature interval, from zero Kelvin degrees to millions of degrees in stars. That is an aggregation state which coexist with all others aggregation states(solid, liquid, gaseous, ethereal) and on which it influenced them. The actual official science is mistaken in great proportion because this has not in sight the Ether.
The ACTUAL ELECTRICAL GENERATORS : galvanic elements and electrical accumulators; dynamos and alternators; thermoelements and photoelectric cell - transform nothing, but they only gather the electrical energy= the particles of the electrical ether which exist in metals, in the environing medium, in the thermic radiation or in the ray of light!
The ELECTRICAL CURRENT consist in circulation in the round and in lengthways to one electrical conductor to the particles of electrical ether guided on the magnetic field from the round the conductor; magnetic field formed all from particles of electrical ether coupled head at head and expelled in concentric circles in the round the conductor.If it interrupt the electrical current, then it decompose and this magnetic field in particles of electrical ether and it drain in circuit
The ELECTRICAL FIELD is a field of particles of electrical ether, free and it move approximate in right line.The MAGNETIC FIELD from the round of one conductor is constituted forever from particles of the electrical ether, but magnetic coupled head at head and it move on a curve forming concentric circles in round to one conductor.The ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD is a combination of particles of electrical field anf of curls of magnetic field, having property of the evolve in space.
The ELECTRON is not an exclusive electrical load, but an elementary particle from the composition of any atom, and is only a particle with intermediate role in the unfolding of the electrical phenomenons. The REAL ELECTRCAL LOAD is a particle of electrical ether more nore small than the electron, has and she a personal and rapid rotation, producing a personal magnetic field, which it gear with the magnetic field from the round of one electrical conductor.
The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether.
• SandustanBrasov The ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.
It popularize the fantastical theories and stantardized theories with which it terrorize the inhabitants the Earth, after what Einstein with relativity theory had blocked the science of the century XX. Sptephen Hawking and roger Penrose had demonstrated in 1967 that the black holes proceed from the relativity theory. How it can conceive and it can say that the heart of the one black hole is a gravitational singularity whose volume tend to zero and whose mass tend to infinite?
• It can direct extract the real electrical loads: particles of electrical ether from spherical chamber of thermonuclear combustion, without utilization the switchs of heat. The extraction of particles of electrical ether it make with the help of the electromagnetic field, such as the resonant generator of the Tesla or any dynamo or allternator.
My planetary brethren and you physicists, engineers and men of science let's awaken at reality, at knowledge, at wisdom and let's pass at the construction the thermonuclear controlled reactors, reactors with spherical chamber after Sun model; which can not be dangerous, not even for those which serve these installations.
In the case of the thermonuclear explosion it produce suddenly - in a few fractions of second, a big quantity of particles of the electrical ether, which in the them entirely produce the electromagnetic impulse accompanyed immediately of the wave of shock, especially an ethereal wave of shock, what shake the ethereal mass from the round of the explosion and the ethereal mass from the bodies meeted in one's way, destroy them on a ray of many kilometres.
The electromagnetic impulse which act about the electrical installations, is, in reality, an electromagnetic radiation - is the real electrical load, constituted from particles of the electrical ether, which can circulate through the circuits of the our electrical installations. These particles proceed from the reaction of the thermonuclear explosion, and are the flaw of mass, of the reaction. These must let capture us, direct without to utilize none switch of heat.
In the case of the one thermonuclear explosion it produce a colossal escape of light, of heat, an electromagnetic impulse and wave of shock. The light it see and burn, but immediately appear the electromagnetic impulse, what block the electrical installations; and afterwards immediately appear the wave of shock which it transmit with a speed of 22 times more great than a speed of the sound, which mean that vibrate the air and the ethereal mass in which exist us.
My brethren: physicist and engineers of the ITER, I say to you a personal opinion about the real electrical load. This because you believe not, that it can direct extract the electrical energy from one controllable thermonuclear reactor, without none switch of heat. Let take a practical example. of explosion of the one thermonuclear bomb - an example which it was realized of many times and on which some understand it, and others not.
• The magnetic field from the round of the conductor is created completely from particles of electrical ether, magnetic coupled, head at head and expelled in the round of the conductor at the rotation of the electrons. If it interrupt the electrical current, then it retire and this magnetic field from the round of the conductor and it drain and the particles of electrical ether which was packed in these electrons.
• When the electrical generator work it make two operation: 1).-with a part from electrical ether gathered it charge and it move the electrons of conductions in the surface of the helix what traverse the inductive magnetic field, establishing the electrical field in the long of the circuit and 2).-with other part of electrical ether gathered, it load the zone of magnetic field from the round of the conductor.
• How it obtain these particles of the electrical ether? For example, with dynamos and alternators it gather the electrical ether from the environing medium. The gathering and the condensation of the particles of electrical ether it make with the help of the inductive magnetic field when the electrical generator work. Here has place and the transformation a one part of particles of electrical ether in particles of the magnetic field from the round of the conductor.
The real electrical load is an electromagnetic particle, which it move length of one conductor turning. The electrical field is a field of particles of electrical ether, free or with a certain density and it move in rigth line. The magnetic field from the round of one conductor is constituted from particles of the electrical ether, but is,magnetic coupled head at head, and it move on a curve forming circles in the round a one conductor.
• SandustanBrasov The electricity is the total of phenomenons produced of the electrical loads in motion or in repose. The electron is not an electrical load, but an elementary particle from the composition of any atom, and is only a particle with intermediate role in the unfolding of the electrical phenomenons. The real electrical load is a particle of electrical ether - of ethereal matter.
Proof of the existence of the ETHER with the his unseen matters are: the transmission of the electromagnetic waves at radio-TV and the extraction of the ethereal electrical particles with the resonant Tesla generator. The electrical discharge of one atmospheric lightning, or to the resonant Tesla generator under shape arborescent, demonstrate the trial of the electrical loads-ethereal or electronic of to penetrate the material compact structure of the universal ETER.
Through the ethereal explanation the electrical generators(electrical accumolators, dynamos and alternators, thermoelements and photoelectric cell) we see that they not transform, nothing, but only gather the electrical energy, gather the electrical ether existent in metals, in the environing medium, in the thermic radiation, in the ray of light, or in the thermonuclear reaction of the ITER.
Just wondering... if we dont know what dark matter is why would you say that dark matter is particles that have not yet been discovered? I dont know on this subject alot but just trying to ged a grisp of it....(sorry my english is not perfect)
@devil19812 It's because dark matter isn't very "mysterious", the prediction for it came from the fact that galaxies were spinning too fast and according to the standard theory of gravity they would have been ripped apart, so the extra mass had to be taken in to account( or alternatively that einstein was wrong), but luckily dark halos were seen around galaxies, they dont give off any light but they would be enough to give the galaxies stability. No space left, google will give you the details.
@darinka770 Science may not be able to prove the nonexistence of God, but you can't prove the contrary either, so I humbly request you go fuck yourself.
While we are looking to a man - several, even - for our answers, you are looking within your own delusional self. Which is better, I wonder?
really, youtube, an advertisement about becoming a mormon on a science video? What about putting atheist videos on videos based on religion - oh wait, you can't do that can you?
@TheOvermaster well telling people theres hope after death and telling people there is no life after death. which one do u think the average person would choose?
@Chewyfied man all i here from science is that there is no after life, almost everything in space will kill us and that i should be glad that stars and asteroids create the basis of life. why isnt there one that involves me seeing the person i love again?
@ThePlatoon4 Look (most) serious scientists will always agree to disagree. If a person wants to believe that there is an after life in which they can see their loved ones and this offers them comfort then it's a good thing for them. However, whether we like it or not... and we don't... the universe is a hostile dangerous place of which a tiny proportion offers a hospitable environment for life.
@ThePlatoon4 Science requires proof to give absolute answers, until either religion can prove the existence of god/s or science disproves it, I as would most scientists I know, not deny that there is always a possibility (there is a quantum mechanics joke in the somewhere but I will spare you the boredom). However as a physicist myself, I cannot accept things, like intelligent design for example, without unequivical proof. But in this secular country you are free to believe whatever you want to.
@ThePlatoon4 because there is absolutely 0 evidence that there is such a place. I know that its a comforting idea, but death is a part of life. i hear a lot of people say, 'but if we just die and thats it, then whats the point?" but think about that for a second. if something ends, does that mean that it is meaningless? why go to see a movie if its just going to end 2 hours later? why read a book if youre just going to finish it? why get up if youre just going to go to bed again later?
@IloveYOUviruses Because weak people shit their pants at the thought that bad shit can happen to them for no reason and that there probably isn't anything on the 'otherside' when you die.
the phenomena used to invoque dark stuff are simply the consequences of electromagnetism at a cosmic scale, that's why you'd never see dark matter nor dark energy
@darinka770 God only provides for our rise out of consciousness. Just like he only provide for the rise of matter out of seemingly nothingness. The more important aspect of reality is consciousness. Without it NOTHING exists. His consciousness gave us all the physical laws. His consciousness also gave our consciousness.That is the double gift.Sort of like understanding the relationship of dancing and fighting. Only the dancing of the celestial bodies gives rise to our fight 4 consciousness.
@darinka770 I understood that my comment was a bit too "angry" or whatever you want to call it a bit too late so i expected a rage-answer, i salute you for your neutral answer! Respect to you :)
@darinka770 And i know btw that was practicly what you said but i'm not turning to some guy who can do somthing but doesn't for information on how to live, becouse i think it's fairly obvius he doesn't know himself. Don't get angry, as long as people do somthing i'm fine with them turning to a god, as long as they don't stare themself blind while searching for answers meant for us to find.
@darinka770 People that argue like that are worthless you know. I've read a lot of "We hace to pray for Japan" and "God save Japan" and whatnot this last weeks and it's just sickening how people feel like they are doing somthing good while sittening around doing nothing at all. Instead of turning to god for salvation and guidance why not work it out ourself. I don't say god doesn't exist but he sure as hell hasn't done alot and sitting around won't change nothing.
... in the hopes of helping others understand the issues better, as well as find a better understanding for myself. At no point did I express any kind of intolerance, and I am embracing your right to your opinion by trying to understand your position and possibly contribute to your understanding. Please don't make unfounded accusations. Like I said before:
Irregardless, I am not using my energy to benefit others? I am simply trying to understand your argument, and address it with any knowledge I have, as well as point out errors in any reasoning, which only serves to help provide you with the chance to review your claims and think about how to *improve* them. What does not benefit others is avoiding questions and ignoring constructive criticism. I am not taking any of this personally-- I am honestly trying contribute to the discussion ...
... which I, admittedly, did not understand their relevance to the topic, and thus asked if you could explain, so that I could actually consider your argument, and pointed out a logical fallacy you committed (which, once again, does not mean your claims are wrong- it just means you need a different argument to support them). You accused me of committing the same fallacy, which was an outright lie, and still did not elaborate on what you were trying to express. ...
First, I don't have any idea why you mentioned evolution- I expressed no opinion whatsoever on the subject. You used the bible as justification for a claim you made, I did precisely what you mention- I shared knowledge I have which demonstrates how that is not a reliable source, and hence does not provide justification (which, it should be noted, does not mean anything about the validity of your claims- it just means you need to provide new justification). You replied with some quotes....
@darinka770 Ummmm..... no..... I did not reference any book, nonetheless how any truth in that book proves the divinity of it..... so it is kind of impossible for me to make that fallacy..... nice try to avoid justifying anything though. And no, what I want is irrelevant- I will believe what is demonstrable and verifiable by independent sources.
@darinka770 I should also point of the enormous fallacy in your reasoning- even if the bible was right about some scientific facts, which you have, thus far, failed to demonstrate, it does not prove the validity of the bible! Science fiction books from the 50's appear to have predicted some of the scientific discoveries and technological advances of today- were they also enlightened by god? Should we all be reading the gospel of I, Robot? Of course not- that would be silly.
@darinka770 The second quote gives and example of an earth not held up by pillars, and yet the bible also describes it as being held up by pillars (Job 9:6, Job 38:4)- I don't see how you can call contradicting yourself enlightened. So heaven is also on pillars? Is that what you are trying to prove with the third quote? Show me the pillars- otherwise this outlandish claim SHOULD remain in doubt. What scientific facts? You've done nothing but demonstrate the bible's self-defeating nature....
@darinka770 pi does not =3.14, it is an irrational number which is equivalent to having a non-terminating, non-repeating decimal expansion. Irregardless, the point is that it is not 3- any deity worth their weight would know that. Yes, earth being held up by pillars is an ancient human explanation, and nothing else, I agree. The first quote seems utterly irrelevant- can you please explain why you think it is important? ...
Dark matter is otherwise known as "Hide and Seek matter". Santient in nature, exists for the sole purpose of boggling the minds of thinking beings. The more effort you place in your search for it, the more it hides behind or inside other E.M. particles. Standing two or more observers around is a futile effort due to their impressive hiding abilities. They are known to be the particles behind all forces and energies which prevent perpetual motion and are the main cause behind all itching. I swear
For us men of reason to pursue in our theoretical scientific quests the existance of protons, neutron, electrons, neutrinos, positrons, quatks, leptons, byrons, mesons, pions, kaons, gluons or dark energy, is absolutelly nonsence. In my theory of Sunotics I include the concept of black energy as being a component of the spectrum of the energies that reaches out into infinity from a zero value of a quantitave ruler that is reasonable and comprenhensible rather than a fantastic abstract of reason
Dark matter is not a kind of matter. There are only particles (hypothetical) and we don't know if those particles turn into waves or atoms or do they turn? Particles are not enough thought to be matter alone. A single neutrino is not a matter, right? I think that a thing must conform to Standard Model to be considered "matter".
space is a ocean :))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) gravity is a hole in the space made by matter ..and when you made hole where go the substance from the hole? .. in the hill or dark matter but is not matter is same oposit thing :D gravity-anti gravity :) ..dark matter is a hill of emty space or empty space with hight pressure ... my mistake this is dark energy :) :D dark matter is inertia of hole ..gravity without matter like dopler effect.. light and electro-magnetism is waves in this ocean
"im still not going to tell you, you had your chance, you blew it,"
In other words...you DON'T have any proof...you just don't want to admit because you don't want everyone to see you for what you are, a peddler of bullshit. And no, I will not be kind, I gave you multiple chances to admit it, yet you continuously refused to.
"I wont tell you what i know, you dont deserve it,"
"Any incomplete theory is an idea, and stays one...."
What are you talking about? There are MANY incomplete theories.
"a theory is not fact and never will be,"
You know what's funny? Essentially every scientist in the world will disagree with you... Yes, theories are wrong many times, however, theories are also the closest thing to fact that exist within all of science save for the data itself.
But no mine friend (just so you know, the friend part isn't serious), I won't let you off on this one so easily. I'm still waiting for you to debunk my claims (which are actually the claims of modern physics). After all, if you are truly so intelligent and in the right, then doing such a thing must be trivial...yet we both know it's impossible because you are simply peddling bullshit. All you've done is make baseless assumptions and then claimed to be true without ANY proof.
Ironically enough, I've been the only kind and composed one this entire time and haven't resorted to ad hominem even once; each and every time I insulted you, I did not even attempt to use the insult itself as an argument and either continued or preceded the insult with a demonstration of how it applies to you.
Quite frankly, you need to get over yourself, fast.
"keep pasting your pre written theory papers on here you idiot. lol what a bell end you are...High scholar?"
Yet I possess greater in skill in both spelling and grammar compared to you, ironically enough. I also suffer from that greatest of diseases known as an education; you know, the condition in which I ACTUALLY KNOW what I am talking about. I know you wouldn't understand it, you're the guy who implied that education is a BAD thing.
"a theory is just that, a theory, it has to be a fact, a proven fact, not a theory."
You're contradicting yourself... So a theory is....a proven fact....but also NOT a theory? Umm...are you okay buddy? Yes, I know a theory is a fact, a proven fact, in fact (pun intended); however, you lost me when you said that a theory is also NOT a theory.... Is some consistency too much to ask for?....
And that is NOT how science works. In science reality ALWAYS supersedes ideas, no matter how dear they may be to us. In fact, this very same thing was Einstein's greatest flaw.
""on many occasions,most infact, the theory is allways wrong when it comes down to the practical,"
You have just proven that you have no idea what a theory actually is within the confines of science, as theories don't become actual theories in science until they can be proven to be true.
"There are many who think everyone who doesnt get a masters degree in physics, has no right speaking about anything really,"
And they're idiots because that's not how the scientific community works. I'm a high schooler, and yet I am scientifically literate and knowledgeable on modern physics. However, that's the thing, I am scientifically literate, where as you have proven time and time again, that you aren't and you're more interested in your baseless ideas than reality.
"keep going to school, with a bit of luck you may have a nervous breakdown by 35,"
Wait a second...correct me if I'm wrong, but are you saying that going to school is a BAD thing? I think I might see your problem...
"and throw yourself off a fucking bridge..."
Awww, how cute. Having had his bullshit exposed and having been proven to be inept, the ignorant coward retreats while licking his wounds, shouting ad hominems all the while.
And how, exactly, would something exist outside of space time? Assuming, of course, that when we refer to space time we refer to the entirety of the universe.
Are you sure about that? Well then, I would like you to tell that to Einstein, or any competent physicist. And then I'd like you to explain how gravity works. You see, what you don't understand is that in Einstein's equations for general relativity, each side of the equation represents something: one side represents the energy/matter content of the universe, and the other the resulting geometry of the universe.
"where matter gains mass by traveling through it,"
But you see...something like this (minus the boson field crap) is already present in the modern models of physics, as mass is understood to be the effect of matter subjected to its interactions with the Higgs Ocean that inundates everything in the universe. So, yet again, you prove that you have NO idea what you are talking about, and that you haven't even the slightest ideas of what the modern cosmological models are.
"im working on another theory based on a neutral none vibrating state,boson field of energy(space)"
First of all, your "idea" (again, it's not even worth that title) doesn't even qualify to be a hypothesis. Secondly, you have no idea what a boson is, do you? Or, for that matter, what anything you've listed is, do you?
"im not trying to change the data you dozy fastard"
So...no...your "ideas" (and I'm sorry to butcher the word with such bad credit) are baseless and not even worthy of the title of hypothesis.
"Im not interested in the brick wall they have come to..."
The brick wall? You mean....the modern models of physics built on observation and PROVEN fact (unlike ANYTHING that you are proposing). Again, reality, welcome to it.
Ahhh, more Ad Hominem. I actually find your ineptness quite beautiful, to be honest.
"im working on a hypothetical theory"
A hypothetical theory that has not ONE inkling of proof based on assumptions that you've yet to prove and justify that would literally rewrite all of the known laws of physics. FIRST you have to prove your assumptions to be correct and completely rewrite the laws of physics, THEN you can call it a hypothesis. But for now...no.
"I have come to the conclusion, that time is an atomic effect,"
And you'd be wrong as time can and MUST exist independent of matter, and therefore, atoms.
Furthermore, time also must exists homgenously throughout the universe, however, we know for a fact that most of the universe actually contains almost no matter at all.
"they then think up string theory and stuff like that to explain it."
Umm...again...No.... String Theory was not invented to explain that. It was made up to explain phenomena such as quantum gravity, the seeming fine-tunedness of the early universe before the big bang, and to understand some...odder aspects of quantum mechanics (such as indeterminancy), but quantum entanglement is NOT one of these problem. Nor has it been for a LONG time.
If you want to read up on it, I recommend Brian Greene's "Fabric of the Cosmos", a wonderful book on a wonderful subject that would really help you sound much less like a blithering idiot.
"now take your quantum entanglement theory, that proves an interaction of two things are interacting beyond the speed of light, so that proves matter interacts beyond space and time"
Ahhh, still stuck before the 1900s I see? Do you know the reason WHY it can do that? Of course you don't, or else you wouldn't be saying something so insipid. The reason why is because of another loophole in Einstein's Equation. (cont).
So...long story short, yes. You CAN exceed C without breaking the known laws of physics.
"you would sit there and say, cant be done, wont you?"
Except...you're an idiot, because it CAN be done, and I just gave an (albeit a criminally simplified) explanation of how it can be done....oh, and yes, this method was actually proposed by actual physicists.
Moving on, according to relativity, you NOTHING IN space can move faster than C, however, space itself is not bound to go by this rule. So, if you can manipulate space in a certain way, you actually can get space to "push" you and achieve speeds substantially faster than C. All without needing infinite energy, and even coming close to breaking ANY of the known laws of physics.
"how do i make this space ship travel faster than light,"
Simple. Find what lawyers would call loopholes in the laws of the universe. For example, by using a wormhole, you can cut directly through space by folding it and taking a straight path downwards between two points.
OR you could go ST, make a Warp Drive. Sit tight for a second, because I am going to explain something to you and....well...you understanding of even basic physics is faulty, so this might be tough.
Mass is, simply put, a quantifiable measure of an object's inertia. OR, even more simply, a quantifiable measure of an object's ability to resist "change" (in the physics sense).
"what is the reason light or an EMF travels"
...for the same reason that everything else travels...because it moves when pushed...
"we all know it has no mass, because science says so,but are you really sure about that?"
Umm....are we going to COMPLETELY ignore that we say that because not only have we observed them and tested them, but also because the equations that explain them (as well as essentially every other fundamental particle) dictates it to be so?
"I dont listen to people who say point blank, NO, IT WONT WORK, OR YOUR WRONG OR THIS IS RIGHT."
So then...you aren't going to listen to ANY science at ALL? Because part of science is being able to separate the physically possible from the physically impossible.
"you think light or energy is a form of electromagnetic radiation"
No...we know it is.... Seriously, this has been known for about a century....
"Because if you can get to the root cause or the true nature of what energy is,"
Except that understanding how light functions wouldn't give you the root cause of all energy. Because electromagnetic radiation is just one type of. We understand nature relatively well, and we also understand how it functions. Furthermore, we understand that essentially all kinds of energy can be broken down into potential and kinetic energy configurations.
I'm not sure, but I DO know that I at least prefer to be correct and use proper diction ad nomenclature where it is needed.
"Now as for the reason light travels at c, you work that out, work out WHY or WHAT does this,"
The properties of the photon along with the properties of what we recognize as the structure of the universe allow this. This is...what? My third or fourth time saying this?
"You think you know what virtual particles are, and why they come to be, well you dont,"
Yes, scientists don't know what they are...even though they have formulated the proofs for them, observed them, and proven them to exist... Yes, we don't know EVERYTHING about them, but we know quite a bit.
So...when are you actually going to debate efficiently and not rant away Ad Hominems like an angsty child. I find it increasingly hard to hold any modicum of respect for you, sir
Umm...no genius... ENERGY doesn't travel at C, LIGHT travels at C. Light is a form of energy (well, in layman's terms) more commonly called electromagnetic radiation, but not all energy is light. Not even close, actually, the VAST majority of energy is not light and doesn't travel at C.
Are you talking about the Quantum Principle of Quantum Entanglement? The one that was proved about 7 or 8 DECADES ago and both was and remains one of the principal and most interesting principals of Quantum Theory? One of the ones that was tested, confirmed, proved to be true, and used to help validate Quantum Theory? Seriously man, seriously....
To give a few more examples: how we could explain chemistry before we knew about stellar nucleosynthesis (the product that produced the elements needed for chemistry); or even how we could conduct chemistry before we truly understood what fundamental particles were (quarks, leptons, etc.)
"sorry i forgot the word "PIG" in the Quantum flying Pig theory statement...now go and play. You angry little shit."
"how can people explain something and say what has caused it, without knowing what or how it was created in the 1st place."
Because the two things are (for the most part) wholly unrelated. In the same way that we were able to quasi-accurately predict the movement of the stars and planets LONG before we knew how they were formed. In the same way that we were able to explain how life evolved LONG before we understood abiogenesis. Etc, etc, etc.
"energy must be in a form of a neutral none vibrating boson field, where frequency propagates through it, from boson to boson, regulating the c constant or maintaining it, giving rise to the virtual particle theory where the energy or frequancy of electrons travels through the field and show up as virtual particles with no mass in the bosons."
/facepalm
No. We understand virtual particles relatively well and...no.Nothing like that. And C doesn't work like that either.
"I think all this dark energy and matter is nothing only a vacuum fluctuation,and shows up as form of energy."
....You don't know what you are talking about do you? Vacuum flunctuations couldn't account for dark matter and dark energy.... Quantum Fluctuation near always results in nothing but virtual particles, named virtual because they exist for so little that it is almost as if they never existed at all. And dark energy is a COMPLETELY different beast.
"its no wonder Einstein only gave us the mechanism or how it is seen to be working, but didnt tell us, what it is that is working"
Because Einstein didn't know what it was that was working, and if he would have made unproven assertions then he would have had his balls cut off in the peer review process. In science you DON'T make assertions that you can't support. On the contrary, today we have several hypothesis on what causes gravity, unlike Einstein.
"yes, and your a genius, tell me, what is energy?"
Long story short, energy is anything that can cause a system to undergo change.
"and tell me what regulates or maintains the c constant"
Why would there need to be something to regulate the C Constant? Of course there is no NEED for it to be regulated. It is just the natural behavior of a particle we call the photon and intrinsic to its many properties combined with the structure of the universe.
I love his obvious relaxed optimism. Kinda tells you to calm down, I think this, you think that, eeh.. no worry, we'll find out, and yeeh maybe it doesn't fit perfectly but no worry, we'll we'll find out some more.
@Serethen THAT'S the thinking that theists fear... they fear the "Well, this is what I think. What do you think? Even if we are wrong, we will eventually learn of it and be correct. As of now, let's think about it and hopefully this thinking will lead to something that will speed up our process of actual discovery."
It I'm to believe something slimy walked out of the ocean and became a wolf and then the wolf walked into the ocean and became a whale, I'll take Christianity with the 34 yr old virgin Jew and 14yr old mom.I don't mean Mormonism or Catholicism but traditional Christianity with the resurrection, moral judgment, that sort of thing
Intelligent Desinger "theory" works the same way: We are, of course, too stupid to know all the answers. But the Designer does! All we have to do is believe in Him. He says he exists and that he created everything. Look at His creation: if it's not self-evidence of His existence and Creation, what is? Therefore, He, the Intelligent Designer exists and He designed all the cosmos, seen and unseen..... That, of course, is no science. That's Santa Claus Fairy Tale stories for 3-4 year-olds...
While it is a given that science needs to have room to maneuver, needs to have hypotheses (even if MOST would turn out to be false), the notion that if, 1st, you can't find any clue to ONE hypothesis (dark matter), you should, 2nd, go on to assume another hypothesis on an even stranger STRANGER, more strange than the first (of which you have NO SOLID evidence; inference is not solid evidence); and then divide them into nice, clean percentages. That's fairy tales, not science.
dark energy is fake, darke energy is a consequence of theory of relativity. if we could invent the correct theory to described the world, we wont get darg energy.
@Viracocha711 before saying that， recall how good you were in high school or university, in term of physics or understanding/insight about physics. recall how many times you were beated up buy your classmates. then, say something
einstein and the amazing stupidity of not being able to account for 96% of all matter in space. instead of putting "torsion" and "coriolis" into the equation, they stumble and mumble in fear... check out nassim haramein, buckminster fuller, etc...
What is the connection between Dark Matter(DM) and Black Holes(BH)?
Can BH be made from DM only?
What happens with the mass of the particles inside the BH since it is only massless radiation that "evaporates" from the BH? Also, How can a BH disappear if the mass is always inside of it?
If "evaporation" happens,perhaps there is DM that is also evaporated from the BH?
It is believed ALL matter was created in the BIG BANG. BUT Could BH be creating DM that collapses into BH + Normal Matter.
this is a pretty good explanation of what "dark matter" is in our universe we call it that b/c it's stuff we can't see. We assume we can't see it b/c it's made up of this other stuff we haven't seen yet, but why hasn't anybody thought about something this simple. If a star was just born today that is 25000 light years away...we won't see that star for another 25k years. Or if a galaxy is born 5 million light years...we won't see that galaxy for another 5 million years this is that dark matter
@Gforcebond If that was the case, we wouldn't observe the gravitational discrepancies that we do currently (in places like the Bullet Cluster). Nothing would appear out of the ordinary, since we wouldn't see the gravitational effects on the surrounding bodies until the light from the star had reached us.
@Gforcebond If scientists cant see it they dont take it into calculation and even if you re right on that matter, the main reason scientists have come up with dark matter is to explain galaxy formation. Galaxies cant form just with regular ordinary matter, it requires dark matter.
Let me try to help clear some things up. Using math, which is fundamentally all about patterns, is scientific if it can describe nature. If you were to look at something and you find some sort of pattern to it...then you would be essentially doing what they are doing. So, we observe something in nature that we have not yet understood. Then we create a whole bunch of theories, most of them being pretty heavy in math. Then we see if it pans out with experiments. DM/DE are not understood yet.
To paraphrase some other random guy on youtube: those scientist sure are stupid. They could just have gone to the youtube comment section and get all the answers there.
i feel like he is undermining the immensity of dark matter. comparing it to the fact that neutrinos were once missing matter seems insufficient.
TDP788 2 weeks ago
They can't "find" dark energy because it's like time, you can't "see" it but you know it's there
maxpainrg2 2 months ago
I take back my defense of this potential energy - the case for its existence seems more a specious filler for balancing gravitational equations, not one based on evidence.
chinngis83 3 months ago
Dark matter is 10 to the 25th power gram blackholes. Dark energy is the Gravitational field the the EVent Horizon behind the Cosic microwave Back ground radiation.
CaptainImpedance 4 months ago in playlist Liked
@CaptainImpedance That doesn't make any sense. The CMB is everywhere.
quidproquo2004 2 months ago
The video "The Dark Matter Myth" demonstrates mathematically that the Dark Matter is a Myth.
Hector
kikaledecuba 5 months ago
Particle physic is nonsense, truth is quantum fluctuations and geometry.
radivojr 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@radivojr You have no clue.
henrywiltcher 4 months ago
"There's no great mystery about (dark particles); it's just the question of detecting them, finding out exactly what they are, and finding out how they fit into our basic, standard model of particle physics."
Um, that sounds like a big mystery to me. Maybe dark matter is permanently opaque and thus cannot be illuminated and is permeable to most forms of radio detection.
chinngis83 6 months ago
i choose religion and science, i know impossible right? but i managed
ThePlatoon4 7 months ago
SandustanBrasov
And yet, we can see, we can visualize the ethereal matter. The scheme to one device for to visualize the ethereal matter: EXIST! And this device it can realize!
My e-mail: s.stan65@yahoo.com
You Tube: sandustanBrasov’s Channel
sandustanBrasov 8 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The matter of the our terrestrial globe has four states of aggregation: solid, liquid, gseous and ethereal and not three after official science. The matter on which we see it, proceed from the ethereal matter, which from cancentration in concentration it had constituted in the electrons, in protons respectivel;y in the atoms of the chemical elements which had overtaken at the gaseous, liquid and solid state. All the matter on which we see it, is condensed ether.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
@sandustanBrasov Next time you're going to write a book you might want to do it somewhere else.
MaggoTDiluteD 9 months ago 9
SandustanBrasov
The GRAVITY’s PARTICLES as aproximately the smallest ethereal particles, constitute the most general ethereal aggregation state from nature, with the largest temperature interval, from zero Kelvin degrees to millions of degrees in stars. That is an aggregation state which coexist with all others aggregation states(solid, liquid, gaseous, ethereal) and on which it influenced them. The actual official science is mistaken in great proportion because this has not in sight the Ether.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The ACTUAL ELECTRICAL GENERATORS : galvanic elements and electrical accumulators; dynamos and alternators; thermoelements and photoelectric cell - transform nothing, but they only gather the electrical energy= the particles of the electrical ether which exist in metals, in the environing medium, in the thermic radiation or in the ray of light!
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The ELECTRICAL CURRENT consist in circulation in the round and in lengthways to one electrical conductor to the particles of electrical ether guided on the magnetic field from the round the conductor; magnetic field formed all from particles of electrical ether coupled head at head and expelled in concentric circles in the round the conductor.If it interrupt the electrical current, then it decompose and this magnetic field in particles of electrical ether and it drain in circuit
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The ELECTRICAL FIELD is a field of particles of electrical ether, free and it move approximate in right line.The MAGNETIC FIELD from the round of one conductor is constituted forever from particles of the electrical ether, but magnetic coupled head at head and it move on a curve forming concentric circles in round to one conductor.The ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD is a combination of particles of electrical field anf of curls of magnetic field, having property of the evolve in space.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The ELECTRON is not an exclusive electrical load, but an elementary particle from the composition of any atom, and is only a particle with intermediate role in the unfolding of the electrical phenomenons. The REAL ELECTRCAL LOAD is a particle of electrical ether more nore small than the electron, has and she a personal and rapid rotation, producing a personal magnetic field, which it gear with the magnetic field from the round of one electrical conductor.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
SandustanBrasov
The PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL MATTER is the visible matter with free eye and is constituted from atoms of the chemical elements. The PHYSICAL-ETHEREAL MATTER is a matter with atoms more small with 7..8 order of dimension than the atoms of chemical elements, and the bodies formed from this matter are invisible for the human eye. The ETHEREAL PHYSICS it occupy with the study of the ethereal matters, but which was abandoned in the XX century, because in 1905 A.Einstein excludes the ether.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
• SandustanBrasov The ETHER is a physical reality constituted from a very small matter, invisible for human eye, and is formed from atoms more small with 7...8 order of dimension than the atoms of the chemical elements. The matter of the ether penetrate in all the visible bodies and is the physical matter which fills both the interplanetary space and the interatomic space. The ether is a matter with mass and weigth, being subdued and she the action of the universal attraction law.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
SandustanBrasov
It popularize the fantastical theories and stantardized theories with which it terrorize the inhabitants the Earth, after what Einstein with relativity theory had blocked the science of the century XX. Sptephen Hawking and roger Penrose had demonstrated in 1967 that the black holes proceed from the relativity theory. How it can conceive and it can say that the heart of the one black hole is a gravitational singularity whose volume tend to zero and whose mass tend to infinite?
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
• It can direct extract the real electrical loads: particles of electrical ether from spherical chamber of thermonuclear combustion, without utilization the switchs of heat. The extraction of particles of electrical ether it make with the help of the electromagnetic field, such as the resonant generator of the Tesla or any dynamo or allternator.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
My planetary brethren and you physicists, engineers and men of science let's awaken at reality, at knowledge, at wisdom and let's pass at the construction the thermonuclear controlled reactors, reactors with spherical chamber after Sun model; which can not be dangerous, not even for those which serve these installations.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
In the case of the thermonuclear explosion it produce suddenly - in a few fractions of second, a big quantity of particles of the electrical ether, which in the them entirely produce the electromagnetic impulse accompanyed immediately of the wave of shock, especially an ethereal wave of shock, what shake the ethereal mass from the round of the explosion and the ethereal mass from the bodies meeted in one's way, destroy them on a ray of many kilometres.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
The electromagnetic impulse which act about the electrical installations, is, in reality, an electromagnetic radiation - is the real electrical load, constituted from particles of the electrical ether, which can circulate through the circuits of the our electrical installations. These particles proceed from the reaction of the thermonuclear explosion, and are the flaw of mass, of the reaction. These must let capture us, direct without to utilize none switch of heat.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
In the case of the one thermonuclear explosion it produce a colossal escape of light, of heat, an electromagnetic impulse and wave of shock. The light it see and burn, but immediately appear the electromagnetic impulse, what block the electrical installations; and afterwards immediately appear the wave of shock which it transmit with a speed of 22 times more great than a speed of the sound, which mean that vibrate the air and the ethereal mass in which exist us.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
My brethren: physicist and engineers of the ITER, I say to you a personal opinion about the real electrical load. This because you believe not, that it can direct extract the electrical energy from one controllable thermonuclear reactor, without none switch of heat. Let take a practical example. of explosion of the one thermonuclear bomb - an example which it was realized of many times and on which some understand it, and others not.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
sandustanBrasov
• The magnetic field from the round of the conductor is created completely from particles of electrical ether, magnetic coupled, head at head and expelled in the round of the conductor at the rotation of the electrons. If it interrupt the electrical current, then it retire and this magnetic field from the round of the conductor and it drain and the particles of electrical ether which was packed in these electrons.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
sandustanBrasov
• When the electrical generator work it make two operation: 1).-with a part from electrical ether gathered it charge and it move the electrons of conductions in the surface of the helix what traverse the inductive magnetic field, establishing the electrical field in the long of the circuit and 2).-with other part of electrical ether gathered, it load the zone of magnetic field from the round of the conductor.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
sandustanBrasov
• How it obtain these particles of the electrical ether? For example, with dynamos and alternators it gather the electrical ether from the environing medium. The gathering and the condensation of the particles of electrical ether it make with the help of the inductive magnetic field when the electrical generator work. Here has place and the transformation a one part of particles of electrical ether in particles of the magnetic field from the round of the conductor.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
sandustanBrasov
The real electrical load is an electromagnetic particle, which it move length of one conductor turning. The electrical field is a field of particles of electrical ether, free or with a certain density and it move in rigth line. The magnetic field from the round of one conductor is constituted from particles of the electrical ether, but is,magnetic coupled head at head, and it move on a curve forming circles in the round a one conductor.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
• SandustanBrasov The electricity is the total of phenomenons produced of the electrical loads in motion or in repose. The electron is not an electrical load, but an elementary particle from the composition of any atom, and is only a particle with intermediate role in the unfolding of the electrical phenomenons. The real electrical load is a particle of electrical ether - of ethereal matter.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Proof of the existence of the ETHER with the his unseen matters are: the transmission of the electromagnetic waves at radio-TV and the extraction of the ethereal electrical particles with the resonant Tesla generator. The electrical discharge of one atmospheric lightning, or to the resonant Tesla generator under shape arborescent, demonstrate the trial of the electrical loads-ethereal or electronic of to penetrate the material compact structure of the universal ETER.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
Through the ethereal explanation the electrical generators(electrical accumolators, dynamos and alternators, thermoelements and photoelectric cell) we see that they not transform, nothing, but only gather the electrical energy, gather the electrical ether existent in metals, in the environing medium, in the thermic radiation, in the ray of light, or in the thermonuclear reaction of the ITER.
sandustanBrasov 9 months ago
Just wondering... if we dont know what dark matter is why would you say that dark matter is particles that have not yet been discovered? I dont know on this subject alot but just trying to ged a grisp of it....(sorry my english is not perfect)
devil19812 9 months ago
@devil19812 It's because dark matter isn't very "mysterious", the prediction for it came from the fact that galaxies were spinning too fast and according to the standard theory of gravity they would have been ripped apart, so the extra mass had to be taken in to account( or alternatively that einstein was wrong), but luckily dark halos were seen around galaxies, they dont give off any light but they would be enough to give the galaxies stability. No space left, google will give you the details.
S1CKDRIFT3R 9 months ago
@darinka770 Science may not be able to prove the nonexistence of God, but you can't prove the contrary either, so I humbly request you go fuck yourself.
While we are looking to a man - several, even - for our answers, you are looking within your own delusional self. Which is better, I wonder?
MrCynix 9 months ago
really, youtube, an advertisement about becoming a mormon on a science video? What about putting atheist videos on videos based on religion - oh wait, you can't do that can you?
TheOvermaster 10 months ago 50
@TheOvermaster Atheists don't care about "become an atheist" advertising, because we've got better things to do... like thinking.
slugfly 9 months ago 3
@slugfly meh, just because u want to know something doesnt mean u need to know it, somethings arent meant to be known :P
ThePlatoon4 7 months ago
@TheOvermaster If you're running Firefox, AdBlockPlus will eliminate ads from your YT viewing. I've seen those mormon ads, btw...ugh
MikeRoePhonicsMusic 9 months ago
@TheOvermaster why r u associating science with atheism?
quagmire444 8 months ago 4
@TheOvermaster well telling people theres hope after death and telling people there is no life after death. which one do u think the average person would choose?
ThePlatoon4 7 months ago
@ThePlatoon4 The average person is not religeous in most countries in europe and north america.
Chewyfied 7 months ago
@Chewyfied wtf? did u ask everyone in europe and america?
ThePlatoon4 7 months ago
@ThePlatoon4 ... you didn't get the memo?
Chewyfied 7 months ago
@Chewyfied man all i here from science is that there is no after life, almost everything in space will kill us and that i should be glad that stars and asteroids create the basis of life. why isnt there one that involves me seeing the person i love again?
ThePlatoon4 7 months ago
@ThePlatoon4 Look (most) serious scientists will always agree to disagree. If a person wants to believe that there is an after life in which they can see their loved ones and this offers them comfort then it's a good thing for them. However, whether we like it or not... and we don't... the universe is a hostile dangerous place of which a tiny proportion offers a hospitable environment for life.
Chewyfied 7 months ago
@ThePlatoon4 Science requires proof to give absolute answers, until either religion can prove the existence of god/s or science disproves it, I as would most scientists I know, not deny that there is always a possibility (there is a quantum mechanics joke in the somewhere but I will spare you the boredom). However as a physicist myself, I cannot accept things, like intelligent design for example, without unequivical proof. But in this secular country you are free to believe whatever you want to.
Chewyfied 7 months ago
@ThePlatoon4 because there is absolutely 0 evidence that there is such a place. I know that its a comforting idea, but death is a part of life. i hear a lot of people say, 'but if we just die and thats it, then whats the point?" but think about that for a second. if something ends, does that mean that it is meaningless? why go to see a movie if its just going to end 2 hours later? why read a book if youre just going to finish it? why get up if youre just going to go to bed again later?
roont 7 months ago
@TheOvermaster Science and relgion (or lack thereof) are not mutually exclusive.
slthomp2 7 months ago
@TheOvermaster I keep misreading 'Mormons' as 'Morons', but then I realised it doesn't matter, they're both the same thing.
skulsaw 2 months ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
Aha! Eureka!
That sums it up, caps lock buttons are non-existent!
But how the.. did you just... change from big to small letters? Without Caps? o_O
whaaaaa?
Serethen 10 months ago
The most amazing thing about his answer was the fact that his wrinkles stop at the same point his hair line begins.
tmullen28 10 months ago
I really dont think dark matter exists
0warrior4life 10 months ago
Susskind: dark matter exists, we don't need to see them cuz they are real, remember, neutrinos...
why is it that human beings are so prone to become relligious ppl?
IloveYOUviruses 10 months ago
@IloveYOUviruses Because weak people shit their pants at the thought that bad shit can happen to them for no reason and that there probably isn't anything on the 'otherside' when you die.
TheSleepyV 9 months ago
the phenomena used to invoque dark stuff are simply the consequences of electromagnetism at a cosmic scale, that's why you'd never see dark matter nor dark energy
IloveYOUviruses 10 months ago
A GENIOUS! One of the best of our time.
MrBTie 10 months ago
@darinka770 you write well for a youtube commentator. which faith do you bellieve in?
mmantech 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@darinka770 Neither can you prove that GOD exists.....
CalmNoise 10 months ago
@darinka770 God only provides for our rise out of consciousness. Just like he only provide for the rise of matter out of seemingly nothingness. The more important aspect of reality is consciousness. Without it NOTHING exists. His consciousness gave us all the physical laws. His consciousness also gave our consciousness.That is the double gift.Sort of like understanding the relationship of dancing and fighting. Only the dancing of the celestial bodies gives rise to our fight 4 consciousness.
Kostly 11 months ago
I really like dark energy. I like consciousness better.
Kostly 11 months ago
@darinka770 I understood that my comment was a bit too "angry" or whatever you want to call it a bit too late so i expected a rage-answer, i salute you for your neutral answer! Respect to you :)
ffsboom 11 months ago
@darinka770 And i know btw that was practicly what you said but i'm not turning to some guy who can do somthing but doesn't for information on how to live, becouse i think it's fairly obvius he doesn't know himself. Don't get angry, as long as people do somthing i'm fine with them turning to a god, as long as they don't stare themself blind while searching for answers meant for us to find.
ffsboom 11 months ago
@darinka770 People that argue like that are worthless you know. I've read a lot of "We hace to pray for Japan" and "God save Japan" and whatnot this last weeks and it's just sickening how people feel like they are doing somthing good while sittening around doing nothing at all. Instead of turning to god for salvation and guidance why not work it out ourself. I don't say god doesn't exist but he sure as hell hasn't done alot and sitting around won't change nothing.
ffsboom 11 months ago
... in the hopes of helping others understand the issues better, as well as find a better understanding for myself. At no point did I express any kind of intolerance, and I am embracing your right to your opinion by trying to understand your position and possibly contribute to your understanding. Please don't make unfounded accusations. Like I said before:
祝你生活順心.
LeonhardEuler1 11 months ago
Irregardless, I am not using my energy to benefit others? I am simply trying to understand your argument, and address it with any knowledge I have, as well as point out errors in any reasoning, which only serves to help provide you with the chance to review your claims and think about how to *improve* them. What does not benefit others is avoiding questions and ignoring constructive criticism. I am not taking any of this personally-- I am honestly trying contribute to the discussion ...
LeonhardEuler1 11 months ago
... which I, admittedly, did not understand their relevance to the topic, and thus asked if you could explain, so that I could actually consider your argument, and pointed out a logical fallacy you committed (which, once again, does not mean your claims are wrong- it just means you need a different argument to support them). You accused me of committing the same fallacy, which was an outright lie, and still did not elaborate on what you were trying to express. ...
LeonhardEuler1 11 months ago
First, I don't have any idea why you mentioned evolution- I expressed no opinion whatsoever on the subject. You used the bible as justification for a claim you made, I did precisely what you mention- I shared knowledge I have which demonstrates how that is not a reliable source, and hence does not provide justification (which, it should be noted, does not mean anything about the validity of your claims- it just means you need to provide new justification). You replied with some quotes....
LeonhardEuler1 11 months ago
@darinka770 Ummmm..... no..... I did not reference any book, nonetheless how any truth in that book proves the divinity of it..... so it is kind of impossible for me to make that fallacy..... nice try to avoid justifying anything though. And no, what I want is irrelevant- I will believe what is demonstrable and verifiable by independent sources.
祝你生活順心.
LeonhardEuler1 11 months ago
@darinka770 I should also point of the enormous fallacy in your reasoning- even if the bible was right about some scientific facts, which you have, thus far, failed to demonstrate, it does not prove the validity of the bible! Science fiction books from the 50's appear to have predicted some of the scientific discoveries and technological advances of today- were they also enlightened by god? Should we all be reading the gospel of I, Robot? Of course not- that would be silly.
LeonhardEuler1 11 months ago
@darinka770 The second quote gives and example of an earth not held up by pillars, and yet the bible also describes it as being held up by pillars (Job 9:6, Job 38:4)- I don't see how you can call contradicting yourself enlightened. So heaven is also on pillars? Is that what you are trying to prove with the third quote? Show me the pillars- otherwise this outlandish claim SHOULD remain in doubt. What scientific facts? You've done nothing but demonstrate the bible's self-defeating nature....
LeonhardEuler1 11 months ago
@darinka770 pi does not =3.14, it is an irrational number which is equivalent to having a non-terminating, non-repeating decimal expansion. Irregardless, the point is that it is not 3- any deity worth their weight would know that. Yes, earth being held up by pillars is an ancient human explanation, and nothing else, I agree. The first quote seems utterly irrelevant- can you please explain why you think it is important? ...
LeonhardEuler1 11 months ago
@darinka770 It also says that pi=3 and the earth is held up by pillars..... not sure it's claims are very trustworthy....
LeonhardEuler1 11 months ago
Dark matter is otherwise known as "Hide and Seek matter". Santient in nature, exists for the sole purpose of boggling the minds of thinking beings. The more effort you place in your search for it, the more it hides behind or inside other E.M. particles. Standing two or more observers around is a futile effort due to their impressive hiding abilities. They are known to be the particles behind all forces and energies which prevent perpetual motion and are the main cause behind all itching. I swear
BigotesMcbuff 11 months ago
they should intive the writers of the Big Bang theory, LOL. And have sheldon present the idea, haha.
gulbirk 11 months ago
For us men of reason to pursue in our theoretical scientific quests the existance of protons, neutron, electrons, neutrinos, positrons, quatks, leptons, byrons, mesons, pions, kaons, gluons or dark energy, is absolutelly nonsence. In my theory of Sunotics I include the concept of black energy as being a component of the spectrum of the energies that reaches out into infinity from a zero value of a quantitave ruler that is reasonable and comprenhensible rather than a fantastic abstract of reason
jqs1943 1 year ago
Dark matter is not a kind of matter. There are only particles (hypothetical) and we don't know if those particles turn into waves or atoms or do they turn? Particles are not enough thought to be matter alone. A single neutrino is not a matter, right? I think that a thing must conform to Standard Model to be considered "matter".
ScapegoatTheTsarBomb 1 year ago
The lighting makes this scary D:
OmegaDude22 1 year ago
space is a ocean :))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) gravity is a hole in the space made by matter ..and when you made hole where go the substance from the hole? .. in the hill or dark matter but is not matter is same oposit thing :D gravity-anti gravity :) ..dark matter is a hill of emty space or empty space with hight pressure ... my mistake this is dark energy :) :D dark matter is inertia of hole ..gravity without matter like dopler effect.. light and electro-magnetism is waves in this ocean
ivosuper 1 year ago
LOLZ i 4T hes names SaiD Lynard Skynard guitar hero ftw
blazin20aday 1 year ago
deanm this two fags just keep going at it ! lmao
deleonusmc121212 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"im still not going to tell you, you had your chance, you blew it,"
In other words...you DON'T have any proof...you just don't want to admit because you don't want everyone to see you for what you are, a peddler of bullshit. And no, I will not be kind, I gave you multiple chances to admit it, yet you continuously refused to.
"I wont tell you what i know, you dont deserve it,"
Look above.
tskasa1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"Any incomplete theory is an idea, and stays one...."
What are you talking about? There are MANY incomplete theories.
"a theory is not fact and never will be,"
You know what's funny? Essentially every scientist in the world will disagree with you... Yes, theories are wrong many times, however, theories are also the closest thing to fact that exist within all of science save for the data itself.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
But no mine friend (just so you know, the friend part isn't serious), I won't let you off on this one so easily. I'm still waiting for you to debunk my claims (which are actually the claims of modern physics). After all, if you are truly so intelligent and in the right, then doing such a thing must be trivial...yet we both know it's impossible because you are simply peddling bullshit. All you've done is make baseless assumptions and then claimed to be true without ANY proof.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@tskasa1
"not with your attitude."
Ironically enough, I've been the only kind and composed one this entire time and haven't resorted to ad hominem even once; each and every time I insulted you, I did not even attempt to use the insult itself as an argument and either continued or preceded the insult with a demonstration of how it applies to you.
Quite frankly, you need to get over yourself, fast.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"keep pasting your pre written theory papers on here you idiot. lol what a bell end you are...High scholar?"
Yet I possess greater in skill in both spelling and grammar compared to you, ironically enough. I also suffer from that greatest of diseases known as an education; you know, the condition in which I ACTUALLY KNOW what I am talking about. I know you wouldn't understand it, you're the guy who implied that education is a BAD thing.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"a theory is just that, a theory, it has to be a fact, a proven fact, not a theory."
You're contradicting yourself... So a theory is....a proven fact....but also NOT a theory? Umm...are you okay buddy? Yes, I know a theory is a fact, a proven fact, in fact (pun intended); however, you lost me when you said that a theory is also NOT a theory.... Is some consistency too much to ask for?....
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
And that is NOT how science works. In science reality ALWAYS supersedes ideas, no matter how dear they may be to us. In fact, this very same thing was Einstein's greatest flaw.
""on many occasions,most infact, the theory is allways wrong when it comes down to the practical,"
You have just proven that you have no idea what a theory actually is within the confines of science, as theories don't become actual theories in science until they can be proven to be true.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"There are many who think everyone who doesnt get a masters degree in physics, has no right speaking about anything really,"
And they're idiots because that's not how the scientific community works. I'm a high schooler, and yet I am scientifically literate and knowledgeable on modern physics. However, that's the thing, I am scientifically literate, where as you have proven time and time again, that you aren't and you're more interested in your baseless ideas than reality.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"keep going to school, with a bit of luck you may have a nervous breakdown by 35,"
Wait a second...correct me if I'm wrong, but are you saying that going to school is a BAD thing? I think I might see your problem...
"and throw yourself off a fucking bridge..."
Awww, how cute. Having had his bullshit exposed and having been proven to be inept, the ignorant coward retreats while licking his wounds, shouting ad hominems all the while.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
So when scientists say that gravity bends space time, they mean it quite literally as that is how it manifests itself in Einstein's equations.
Space is, to put it in simpler terms, quite a bit like putty; if you have a massive enough object, you can bend it quite a bit.
"you can detatch yourself from space time"
No, you can't.... As then you wouldn't exist. You can't exist outside of space-time. As that would be existing outside of the universe itself.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@tskasa1 could it be possible taht god made space time, and god exists outside of this space time?
Plpoo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Plpoo
"could it be possible taht god made space time,"
By Occam's Razor it is infinitely improbable.
"and god exists outside of this space time?"
And how, exactly, would something exist outside of space time? Assuming, of course, that when we refer to space time we refer to the entirety of the universe.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"By the way, you cant bend space,"
Are you sure about that? Well then, I would like you to tell that to Einstein, or any competent physicist. And then I'd like you to explain how gravity works. You see, what you don't understand is that in Einstein's equations for general relativity, each side of the equation represents something: one side represents the energy/matter content of the universe, and the other the resulting geometry of the universe.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"where matter gains mass by traveling through it,"
But you see...something like this (minus the boson field crap) is already present in the modern models of physics, as mass is understood to be the effect of matter subjected to its interactions with the Higgs Ocean that inundates everything in the universe. So, yet again, you prove that you have NO idea what you are talking about, and that you haven't even the slightest ideas of what the modern cosmological models are.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"im working on another theory based on a neutral none vibrating state,boson field of energy(space)"
First of all, your "idea" (again, it's not even worth that title) doesn't even qualify to be a hypothesis. Secondly, you have no idea what a boson is, do you? Or, for that matter, what anything you've listed is, do you?
"im not trying to change the data you dozy fastard"
Yes, you actually ARE.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
So...no...your "ideas" (and I'm sorry to butcher the word with such bad credit) are baseless and not even worthy of the title of hypothesis.
"Im not interested in the brick wall they have come to..."
The brick wall? You mean....the modern models of physics built on observation and PROVEN fact (unlike ANYTHING that you are proposing). Again, reality, welcome to it.
tskasa1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"You are a moron,"
Ahhh, more Ad Hominem. I actually find your ineptness quite beautiful, to be honest.
"im working on a hypothetical theory"
A hypothetical theory that has not ONE inkling of proof based on assumptions that you've yet to prove and justify that would literally rewrite all of the known laws of physics. FIRST you have to prove your assumptions to be correct and completely rewrite the laws of physics, THEN you can call it a hypothesis. But for now...no.
tskasa1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
Ahhh, followed directly by a failed attempt at technobabble without actually knowing what you are talking about. Again, you need to learn something.
"Think about this...space is not space"
Oh God.... You might be beyond help and reason...
"the black hole is true space"
And your basis for this...well...baseless, assumption issss....what, exactly?
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"I have come to the conclusion, that time is an atomic effect,"
And you'd be wrong as time can and MUST exist independent of matter, and therefore, atoms.
Furthermore, time also must exists homgenously throughout the universe, however, we know for a fact that most of the universe actually contains almost no matter at all.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"they then think up string theory and stuff like that to explain it."
Umm...again...No.... String Theory was not invented to explain that. It was made up to explain phenomena such as quantum gravity, the seeming fine-tunedness of the early universe before the big bang, and to understand some...odder aspects of quantum mechanics (such as indeterminancy), but quantum entanglement is NOT one of these problem. Nor has it been for a LONG time.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
(cont)
If you want to read up on it, I recommend Brian Greene's "Fabric of the Cosmos", a wonderful book on a wonderful subject that would really help you sound much less like a blithering idiot.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"now take your quantum entanglement theory, that proves an interaction of two things are interacting beyond the speed of light, so that proves matter interacts beyond space and time"
Ahhh, still stuck before the 1900s I see? Do you know the reason WHY it can do that? Of course you don't, or else you wouldn't be saying something so insipid. The reason why is because of another loophole in Einstein's Equation. (cont).
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
So...long story short, yes. You CAN exceed C without breaking the known laws of physics.
"you would sit there and say, cant be done, wont you?"
Except...you're an idiot, because it CAN be done, and I just gave an (albeit a criminally simplified) explanation of how it can be done....oh, and yes, this method was actually proposed by actual physicists.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
First of all, yes, ST stands for Star Trek.
Moving on, according to relativity, you NOTHING IN space can move faster than C, however, space itself is not bound to go by this rule. So, if you can manipulate space in a certain way, you actually can get space to "push" you and achieve speeds substantially faster than C. All without needing infinite energy, and even coming close to breaking ANY of the known laws of physics.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"how do i make this space ship travel faster than light,"
Simple. Find what lawyers would call loopholes in the laws of the universe. For example, by using a wormhole, you can cut directly through space by folding it and taking a straight path downwards between two points.
OR you could go ST, make a Warp Drive. Sit tight for a second, because I am going to explain something to you and....well...you understanding of even basic physics is faulty, so this might be tough.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"what is mass,"
Mass is, simply put, a quantifiable measure of an object's inertia. OR, even more simply, a quantifiable measure of an object's ability to resist "change" (in the physics sense).
"what is the reason light or an EMF travels"
...for the same reason that everything else travels...because it moves when pushed...
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"we all know it has no mass, because science says so,but are you really sure about that?"
Umm....are we going to COMPLETELY ignore that we say that because not only have we observed them and tested them, but also because the equations that explain them (as well as essentially every other fundamental particle) dictates it to be so?
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"Is it a wave of energy,"
Umm...basic physics lesson: ALL forms of particles are a form of energy. Furthermore, it is a both a particle and a wave.
"or is it a particle like a photon traveling in a wave, or vibrating a frequency"
It's both a particle AND a wave with vibrating frequency, actually. Again, this has been known since the early 1900s....
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"I dont listen to people who say point blank, NO, IT WONT WORK, OR YOUR WRONG OR THIS IS RIGHT."
So then...you aren't going to listen to ANY science at ALL? Because part of science is being able to separate the physically possible from the physically impossible.
"you think light or energy is a form of electromagnetic radiation"
No...we know it is.... Seriously, this has been known for about a century....
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"Because if you can get to the root cause or the true nature of what energy is,"
Except that understanding how light functions wouldn't give you the root cause of all energy. Because electromagnetic radiation is just one type of. We understand nature relatively well, and we also understand how it functions. Furthermore, we understand that essentially all kinds of energy can be broken down into potential and kinetic energy configurations.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"You are one pain in the ass, you know that?"
I'm not sure, but I DO know that I at least prefer to be correct and use proper diction ad nomenclature where it is needed.
"Now as for the reason light travels at c, you work that out, work out WHY or WHAT does this,"
The properties of the photon along with the properties of what we recognize as the structure of the universe allow this. This is...what? My third or fourth time saying this?
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"You think you know what virtual particles are, and why they come to be, well you dont,"
Yes, scientists don't know what they are...even though they have formulated the proofs for them, observed them, and proven them to exist... Yes, we don't know EVERYTHING about them, but we know quite a bit.
So...when are you actually going to debate efficiently and not rant away Ad Hominems like an angsty child. I find it increasingly hard to hold any modicum of respect for you, sir
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"who understands why energy travels at c"
Umm...no genius... ENERGY doesn't travel at C, LIGHT travels at C. Light is a form of energy (well, in layman's terms) more commonly called electromagnetic radiation, but not all energy is light. Not even close, actually, the VAST majority of energy is not light and doesn't travel at C.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"There is no need for the speed of light to be regulated?"
Ahhh, quote mining. You're bloody adorable, aren't you?
No there is no need for an external force to regulate C, as it is a constant value resulting from the structure of the universe and the photon.
"are you a fucking idiot?"
And another Ad Hominem. What a cute little baby, can't debate at all.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"and see if you atoms exist in another place,"
Are you talking about the Quantum Principle of Quantum Entanglement? The one that was proved about 7 or 8 DECADES ago and both was and remains one of the principal and most interesting principals of Quantum Theory? One of the ones that was tested, confirmed, proved to be true, and used to help validate Quantum Theory? Seriously man, seriously....
tskasa1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
To give a few more examples: how we could explain chemistry before we knew about stellar nucleosynthesis (the product that produced the elements needed for chemistry); or even how we could conduct chemistry before we truly understood what fundamental particles were (quarks, leptons, etc.)
"sorry i forgot the word "PIG" in the Quantum flying Pig theory statement...now go and play. You angry little shit."
Again, Ad Hominem. How cute.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"how can people explain something and say what has caused it, without knowing what or how it was created in the 1st place."
Because the two things are (for the most part) wholly unrelated. In the same way that we were able to quasi-accurately predict the movement of the stars and planets LONG before we knew how they were formed. In the same way that we were able to explain how life evolved LONG before we understood abiogenesis. Etc, etc, etc.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"stop being a smart arse"
No thank you, I will NOT stop being educated and actually KNOWING what I am talking about.
"and use your imagination"
Imaginations are meaningless in science unless you can support them with empirical evidence.
"so stop being a ignorant gobshite..."
Ad Hominem now? How cute.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"energy must be in a form of a neutral none vibrating boson field, where frequency propagates through it, from boson to boson, regulating the c constant or maintaining it, giving rise to the virtual particle theory where the energy or frequancy of electrons travels through the field and show up as virtual particles with no mass in the bosons."
/facepalm
No. We understand virtual particles relatively well and...no.Nothing like that. And C doesn't work like that either.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"I think all this dark energy and matter is nothing only a vacuum fluctuation,and shows up as form of energy."
....You don't know what you are talking about do you? Vacuum flunctuations couldn't account for dark matter and dark energy.... Quantum Fluctuation near always results in nothing but virtual particles, named virtual because they exist for so little that it is almost as if they never existed at all. And dark energy is a COMPLETELY different beast.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"its no wonder Einstein only gave us the mechanism or how it is seen to be working, but didnt tell us, what it is that is working"
Because Einstein didn't know what it was that was working, and if he would have made unproven assertions then he would have had his balls cut off in the peer review process. In science you DON'T make assertions that you can't support. On the contrary, today we have several hypothesis on what causes gravity, unlike Einstein.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
"yes, and your a genius, tell me, what is energy?"
Long story short, energy is anything that can cause a system to undergo change.
"and tell me what regulates or maintains the c constant"
Why would there need to be something to regulate the C Constant? Of course there is no NEED for it to be regulated. It is just the natural behavior of a particle we call the photon and intrinsic to its many properties combined with the structure of the universe.
tskasa1 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
I DON'T THINK THE CAPS LOCK BUTTON EXIST!.. oh snap..
Serethen 1 year ago
I like this mans attitude, his thoughts are basic, and i think its better to start with basic first and then complex.
ExplodingGing 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
And you're wrong
tskasa1 1 year ago
it is quite easy to get govt money this days
IloveYOUviruses 1 year ago
The lighting on this video sucks shit.
rarulis 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER Dont put things in all caps were glad you have an opinion but its just annoying.
CaptMicrowave 1 year ago
I love his obvious relaxed optimism. Kinda tells you to calm down, I think this, you think that, eeh.. no worry, we'll find out, and yeeh maybe it doesn't fit perfectly but no worry, we'll we'll find out some more.
Serethen 1 year ago
@Serethen THAT'S the thinking that theists fear... they fear the "Well, this is what I think. What do you think? Even if we are wrong, we will eventually learn of it and be correct. As of now, let's think about it and hopefully this thinking will lead to something that will speed up our process of actual discovery."
I like that.
StainedShuriken333 1 year ago
@StainedShuriken333
exactly! I like you for liking that.
Serethen 1 year ago
It I'm to believe something slimy walked out of the ocean and became a wolf and then the wolf walked into the ocean and became a whale, I'll take Christianity with the 34 yr old virgin Jew and 14yr old mom.I don't mean Mormonism or Catholicism but traditional Christianity with the resurrection, moral judgment, that sort of thing
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
Intelligent Desinger "theory" works the same way: We are, of course, too stupid to know all the answers. But the Designer does! All we have to do is believe in Him. He says he exists and that he created everything. Look at His creation: if it's not self-evidence of His existence and Creation, what is? Therefore, He, the Intelligent Designer exists and He designed all the cosmos, seen and unseen..... That, of course, is no science. That's Santa Claus Fairy Tale stories for 3-4 year-olds...
HenryDavidT 1 year ago
While it is a given that science needs to have room to maneuver, needs to have hypotheses (even if MOST would turn out to be false), the notion that if, 1st, you can't find any clue to ONE hypothesis (dark matter), you should, 2nd, go on to assume another hypothesis on an even stranger STRANGER, more strange than the first (of which you have NO SOLID evidence; inference is not solid evidence); and then divide them into nice, clean percentages. That's fairy tales, not science.
HenryDavidT 1 year ago
dark matter is real, dark matter = ether;
dark energy is fake, darke energy is a consequence of theory of relativity. if we could invent the correct theory to described the world, we wont get darg energy.
mcbird2008 1 year ago
dark matter is real, dark energy is fake.
mcbird2008 1 year ago
@mcbird2008 WRONG!
Viracocha711 1 year ago
@Viracocha711 before saying that， recall how good you were in high school or university, in term of physics or understanding/insight about physics. recall how many times you were beated up buy your classmates. then, say something
mcbird2008 1 year ago
wow he is very smart...
WonderWomanFan4life 1 year ago
he sounds just like christopher walken.
TheBigPrettyOne 1 year ago 2
einstein and the amazing stupidity of not being able to account for 96% of all matter in space. instead of putting "torsion" and "coriolis" into the equation, they stumble and mumble in fear... check out nassim haramein, buckminster fuller, etc...
jetrabbiz 1 year ago
What is the connection between Dark Matter(DM) and Black Holes(BH)?
Can BH be made from DM only?
What happens with the mass of the particles inside the BH since it is only massless radiation that "evaporates" from the BH? Also, How can a BH disappear if the mass is always inside of it?
If "evaporation" happens,perhaps there is DM that is also evaporated from the BH?
It is believed ALL matter was created in the BIG BANG. BUT Could BH be creating DM that collapses into BH + Normal Matter.
gespilk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No way out man Asian women #lushfmlk.info#
kathejuisa 1 year ago
this is a pretty good explanation of what "dark matter" is in our universe we call it that b/c it's stuff we can't see. We assume we can't see it b/c it's made up of this other stuff we haven't seen yet, but why hasn't anybody thought about something this simple. If a star was just born today that is 25000 light years away...we won't see that star for another 25k years. Or if a galaxy is born 5 million light years...we won't see that galaxy for another 5 million years this is that dark matter
Gforcebond 1 year ago
@Gforcebond If that was the case, we wouldn't observe the gravitational discrepancies that we do currently (in places like the Bullet Cluster). Nothing would appear out of the ordinary, since we wouldn't see the gravitational effects on the surrounding bodies until the light from the star had reached us.
shannow77 1 year ago
@Gforcebond If scientists cant see it they dont take it into calculation and even if you re right on that matter, the main reason scientists have come up with dark matter is to explain galaxy formation. Galaxies cant form just with regular ordinary matter, it requires dark matter.
vidhchand 1 year ago
@Gforcebond No dark matter is a yet undetected particle.
Viracocha711 1 year ago
@Gforcebond /watch?v=Zl4W3DYTIKw
Viracocha711 1 year ago
MOO-SOCK-KEY LAND IS WEALTHY
MrCaplocked 1 year ago
Ah, Stanford is lucky to have Leonard Susskind.
LittleBabyWheeler 1 year ago
Let me try to help clear some things up. Using math, which is fundamentally all about patterns, is scientific if it can describe nature. If you were to look at something and you find some sort of pattern to it...then you would be essentially doing what they are doing. So, we observe something in nature that we have not yet understood. Then we create a whole bunch of theories, most of them being pretty heavy in math. Then we see if it pans out with experiments. DM/DE are not understood yet.
Fand421 1 year ago
Susskind is a brilliant man with common sense!
TheFRiNgEguitars 1 year ago 3
@TheFRiNgEguitars common sense not found by the majority of mankind...so in fact not so common at all!
BlueBellyfluff 1 year ago
dark energy = the force :P
Pianoistehbest 1 year ago
@29Gixxer hahahaha, well said!
184ktmdm 1 year ago
Leonard Susskind is da best :)
DonDaddy86 1 year ago
Leonard Susskind is da best :)
DonDaddy86 1 year ago
Isn't he Stephen Hawking's friend / rival? If not, who am I thinking of?
ExploringBeyond 1 year ago
To paraphrase some other random guy on youtube: those scientist sure are stupid. They could just have gone to the youtube comment section and get all the answers there.