hey sal you just said in the beginning that this was "compounding" forward and "discounting" backwards. But when we calculated year3 values in the previous video we used the formula =PV(1+2r)=100(1.1)=110 which is the normal payment two years after with "UNcompounded" interest rate. Had it been compounded then we would use the formula =PV(1+r)^2=100(1.05)^2=110.25 which gives adifferent answer. So why do you call this "compounding" in this case?
Hey sal, you said that this is "compounding" forward and "discounting backwards, but the way we calculated the year3 values in the previous video was by the formula: PV(1+2r)=100(1.1)=110 which is the normal way of finding the uncompounded future payment with annual interest. However if it had been compounded then it would be =100(1.05)^2=110.25. So why do you call the first choice future payments as compounded?
can someone tell me why cant we work in forward terms? i find myself subconsciously calculating the interest rates forwards instead of backwards and finding the PV.
i mean, essentially both achieve the same aims of finding which option is the best so i dont see any real advantage of finding the PV over the final value? unless there are other reasons that sal hasnt explained?
if a person does say he will give you $100 now or $110 in year. How will you find the present value? Will it depend on inflation and/or prices of goods to income ration?
u have helped me a lot
andrew1996128 3 weeks ago in playlist Finance
i dont see any real advantage of finding the PV over the final value?
MrPEDOCTOR 4 weeks ago
btw the equation is a little cricked cause 20+50+35=105
WilliamNaville 3 months ago
lol you should add inflation in there before everybody is running to the federal reserver :P
WilliamNaville 3 months ago
hookup now bit.ly\n16lux
iULorraine770 3 months ago
man i wish we have teachers lyk u in our school :)
haseebahmed07518 9 months ago
hey sal you just said in the beginning that this was "compounding" forward and "discounting" backwards. But when we calculated year3 values in the previous video we used the formula =PV(1+2r)=100(1.1)=110 which is the normal payment two years after with "UNcompounded" interest rate. Had it been compounded then we would use the formula =PV(1+r)^2=100(1.05)^2=110.25 which gives adifferent answer. So why do you call this "compounding" in this case?
zahra225512 1 year ago
Hey sal, you said that this is "compounding" forward and "discounting backwards, but the way we calculated the year3 values in the previous video was by the formula: PV(1+2r)=100(1.1)=110 which is the normal way of finding the uncompounded future payment with annual interest. However if it had been compounded then it would be =100(1.05)^2=110.25. So why do you call the first choice future payments as compounded?
zahra225512 1 year ago
can someone tell me why cant we work in forward terms? i find myself subconsciously calculating the interest rates forwards instead of backwards and finding the PV.
i mean, essentially both achieve the same aims of finding which option is the best so i dont see any real advantage of finding the PV over the final value? unless there are other reasons that sal hasnt explained?
thegoonist 1 year ago
if a person does say he will give you $100 now or $110 in year. How will you find the present value? Will it depend on inflation and/or prices of goods to income ration?
cunui2 2 years ago
@cunui2 its based on the discount rates that the federal reserve maintains and controls
santyias87 1 year ago
god bless you !!! thanks
autorancho 2 years ago
Sal, I've learned more from your videos than I ever did in my five years of Business studies in College - Thanks
Philip (Northern Ireland/U.K)
PhilipK100 2 years ago 3
@PhilipK100 % 5 years? where your sleeping during lectures or what?
ionuorah 1 year ago
wow, you're my hero Sal!
kittykattykoo 3 years ago 16
I give this a A+. A perfect teacher!
LostinArnhem 3 years ago 14
This has been flagged as spam show
Awesome! I'm doing my MBA and learning about NPV/PV/FPV right now and have found your videos extremely useful!!!
sagevadi 3 years ago