Added: 3 years ago
From: 20avenger07
Views: 73,570
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (147)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • whats music name?

  • 2003 was shit in comparison. KILLER GAMMA POODLE? Fuck you.

  • 2003 was so much more emotional and realistic and 2008 was about action.

  • i liked both versions for different reasons. i liked the 2008 one better because it had awesome action and epic diolouge. the 2003 version was cool because it talked ab out the inner rage in Banner and in all of us. i feel that the 2003 film shoould have come out later because at the time, all people cared about was action in movies and not serious human expirience issues. if the 2003 one came out in 2008 and the 2008 one came in 2003, people would be happier

  • 2008 had best fighting scenes but had the shittest Bruce Banner, 2003 was so damn boring but Eric Bana was better at Bruce Banner

  • hulk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 2nd Hulk movie was better, except for 2 people: Betty & General Ross

    On Betty Ross: Liv Tyler seriously? In my opinion Jennifer Connelly was way better.

    On General Ross: William Hurt wasn't bad, I just like Sam Elliott better.

  • Vote The Incredible Hulk SO POWER MAN 2011 VOTE FOR HIMM!!1 POWER

  • dude i dont know both are still killing machines

  • 2008 version of hulk was better in my opinion....a two monster fight, best newcomers in the characters....2003 was alright...though it had good acting and action scenes, well....dont know what to say to 2003...

  • 2003 hulk was bigger than 2008..

  • BENEATH 150 BILLION TONS STANDS THE HULK, ...AND HE'S NOT HAPPY!

  • What's song?

  • 2008 would murder the hell out of 2003

  • What stupid person would think 2003s better than 2008

  • 2003 would take the 2008 one out

  • the reason the 03 version was better was because of conelly

  • to me 2008 version was better because its going off the comic and also hulk look more realistic

  • Nick Nolte, 2003 wins !

  • 2008 hulk is more ripped and defined than 2003.

  • Hulk 2008 é mais forte o Hulk 2003 era só grande meio gordinho com cara de bonzinho

  • hulk 2008 is best, the hulk 2003 was just big and fat, but i like him to.

  • I think 2003 hulk would win becus when he gets angry he gets bigger and 2008 doenst.maybe he does but 2003 hulk gets HUGE!!!Like when 2003 hulk is escaping lab , his head is HUGE!(That part is somewhere around when they shoot him with the growing clay, or whatever it was)

  • I bet hulk wins

  • my favourite hulk is the one holding the club at 0:13. Out of all the hulk films that representation of the hulk is my favourite. (although it would only be one of the last two films anyway)

  • 2008 Hulk was so weird, I mean he turns into the hulk when his blood pressure goes up to a certain point??? WTF?? He couldnt even sleep with Liv Tyler cause of that :\.....In the comics it was just when he got mad, period. MAD not excited or a rise in blood pressure. 2003 was a very good hulk, some people just want to see a pop corn flick and the 2003 hulk wasnt that, it was so much more. So yeah :) Plus Eric Bana did a great Bruce.

  • Anyone else notice that 2003 Hulk is like calmer the the 2008 version? Look at their facial expressions and tell me which looks angrier? As the Hulk should be!

  • incredible hulk was way better everyone that thinks otherwise just doesn't know the comics at all...

  • 2003 hulk looks more stronger.

  • To me HULK was the better film. It had depths, a story, a meaningful purpose, and in a way broke the fourth wall for superhero films. It was original. The only thing The Incredible Hulk had going for itself was that it had a connection to the 70's tv series. I liked that. And another thing, why do people complain so much about HULK being a little...sympathetic! Even in the 70's tv show the hulk was sympathetic. Just watch the episode "Ricky". In that episode hulk actually smiles.

  • i think i shit my pant when toy stark walked in at the end and was like "were putting a team together" only to find out that they replaced edward norton with mark ruffalo bullshit

  • 08 version wuz the best, they didnt stick to him jus fighting machines, he was way more detailed and elaborate. I love that they incorperated various signature moves the hulk is known for, and I love how they didnt have to retell the entire story of how the hulk came to be, but by showing flashbacks you get an understanding of what happend to him an why he's running away

  • Between the 2003 and 2008 version, I thought the 2008 version had a much more credible storyline, plus it was also a nice tribute to the original series and the late Bill Bixby.

  • whtever ppl may say....the old hulk of 2003 was waay better, eric bana is more believable as Bruce banner and also when he transformed into hulk whereas edward norton was just okay as bruce and not so much as a hulk, there was no similarities when he becomes hulk....its not authentic, its not good

  • 2 HULKS?!!!!!!

    (the end is here)

  • its funny cuz eric bana has medium hair but when he hulk he has short hair and then ed norton has short hair but gains long hair idk just pointing it out.....08 was way better

  • 2003 Hulk was a Punny Hulk, 2008 IS THE REAL HULK, 03 was fucking boring, and have an awful villain, but 08 was amazing, great plot, act and a great villain and more elements from Hulk Universe.....2008 IS THE HULK!! deal with that bob!!

  • whats the name of the song?

  • hulk 2003 is stronger.

  • @jedcal123 yes and way better and more real lookin not like a video game!!

  • the 03 hulk is stronger, the 08 hulk looks like he has more veins stcking out n shit

  • Well, The Incredible Hulk was Great, But I Enjoyed The Hulk More.

  • Has anybody noticed that 08 Hulk looks even more hardcore and toned and 03 Hulk just has more mass and bigger...

  • i liked the look of the hulk of 203 but i enjoyed the movie of 2008 more

  • I Enjoyed The Hulk of 2003, The Incredible Hulk of 2008 Sucked!

  • y does everyone say that the new hulk looks fake!?!?!??! the CGI was outstanding! u ppl r fucking blind.

  • In number1 Hulk was actually green but in number 2 he's not, that's the only thing I don't like about 2. I like number 2 way better.

  • @Vincith 2008 Is Green. It just Does'nt Look like it. He's Yellow Green or Olive Green.

  • hate eric

  • first hulk was like a lego toy the second one rocks at the end of the movie was really good when bruce managed to control the hulk xD

  • the new movie is better, but the old hulk seems a lot stronger...

    He regenerated, has higher jumping power and he gets bigger in proportion to his anger...

  • @Petriealright but the 08 hulk looks much more hardcore and toned

  • Fantastic.

  • 0:05

    Hulk: PUNY HUMAN

    it went so fast i almost crapped in my shorts

  • Jennifer Connelly was a way better Betty than Liv but the HULK was so much better in the new one, holy shit if the old hulk and the new one met, I think the old one would cry like he does through most of 2003's THE HULK.

  • I love them both, but like 2003 better. I likes Eric more than Edward, and I think he looked more realistic.

  • If I were to choose between 2003 or 2008 hmmm I choose both hulk...hehe why bother comparing... ;D

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • 2008 makes 2003 it´s bitch

  • edward norton was a much better bruce banner

  • Hulk IS NOT BETTER than Incredible Hulk. My vote is on 08 Hulk.

  • incredible hulk because he's incredible and looks more angry and had an actually cool fight

  • Eric Bana was a better hulk... I thought the 03 hulk had a better story...I liked the betty in 03 way more! She is way cuter. The new hulk only had better graphics. But they didnt even look like the actor they had.

  • 2003 looks real

  • Have you guys seen the new hulk game? damn now thats how hulk should've looked like

  • @extremedrawer411

    the 2003 was based on the comics.

    the 2008 is more realistic,

    so it explains why the 2008 isnt that big

  • Comparing the strength of the two hulks, I actually think the 08 one was more impressive. The 03 one was physically stronger, as shown by throwing the tank and leaping miles at a time. But...you didn't look at the Hulk's form and feel he had that kind of capacity, so it just looked silly. With the 08 one, his strength looked more believable for his size and form, and he was a much more savage character...so you really FEEL how powerful and brutal the Hulk is supposed to be.

  • Damn this is the BEST video of the 2  Incredible hulk movies i EVER seen here on youtube awsome!!! 5/5

  • Like 2008 the best personally.

  • Still haven't seen Hulk, and am looking for a reason that I should. He looks like a cartoon compared to the newer one. Nick Nolte looks like a pretty good character in this movie but Tim Roth's Emil Blonsky was great and William Hurt was awesome too.

  • actually bill bixby's incredible hulk is better than both of them

  • Nice montage

  • Bill Bixby is the SHIT!

  • If the creatures were real the 03 would win in a fight with 08, his physical strength is much greater, running at up to 200mph and leaping distance at 2 to 3 miles for the 03 hulk

  • actually the green hulk is the strongest, the grey hulk is smart and strong but the green hulk is more savage

  • wheres gray hulk? he was the strongest in the comics.

  • I Like Edward Norton :)

  • I really like Edward Norton.

  • Eric Bana and the 2003 Hulk cast in the 2008 Hulk movie with 08 hulk version would have been perfect.

  • 2003 hulk was beefier i think he will rip off the new one

  • Hulkie (Ferrigno) would kick both of their asses...all he would have to do is to pull the cord out of the wall outlet and CGI Hulks would disappear. *lol*

  • OMG! LMAO! that is great and true. Lou Owns. Nuff said.

  • Let's not forgot Lou did a cameo of himself in both versions.

  • Best part of both movies.

  • Now I see how they didnt get both Movies right!

  • here's the difference ones Eric Bana and the other is Edward Norton haha!

  • i like the 2008 version better but i prefer jennifer conelly any day then liv tyler. jennifer conelly is the reason to watch the shitty 2003 version

  • U got that Right! She's the reason I watch any Movie!

  • Yes I agree with u on that.  :)

  • 2008 Hulk would rape 2003 for sure!

    2003 had to fight the environement , while 2008 he uses it as a weapon...

  • i thought two things when i saw the 2008 version.

    1. god, this movie is incredible!

    and 2. .....GOOD GOD the 2003 version SUCKED ASS!

  • 2008 hulk is looks stronger but why did he use weapon while fighting?isn't that what do we call a CHEATER?

  • hulk 2003 looked a little bit fat to me.

  • hulk 2003 hand much better performances and interpratations of the characters especially by eric bana and nick nolte especially in the scene where eric bana meets nolte in the father and son sequence

  • eric bana was definitely the better hulk seems like he had a better understanding of the character than edward norton did and also compare each one of them when they go through the hulk transformation and youll agree eric got it hands down

  • I agree. Also, the graphics of the '03 version, were a little more organic looking than the current version. The producers should have stayed w/ the technology that animated the Hulk in the 1st movie, but kept the defined muscle tone and veins of the 2nd film. The skin tone was better in the 1st one also. The 2nd film-while Way better in story plot-appeared to be a little too CG.

  • I'm very sorry, but I beg to differ. After all, the Hulk from the 2003 movie was a straight green. IMO, because 2008's Hulk had a darker shade of green, it looked more realistic. This is just my opinion. Please respect it.

  • Hulk 2008 is way better. For one, it feels like a comic book and is in fact, more in line with the comics than Hulk 2003. Also, Hulk 2008 is actually entertaining. It doesn't waste the first 45 minutes of the film explaining Banner's melodramatic, boring, made up backstory.

  • Hulk 2003 is way stronger than Hulk 2008, nuff said!

  • Norton is good.

  • i think the 03 hulk looked more realistic as far as animation but was too green

  • I totally agree. I thought the Hulk in the 1st movie, was a better version. Hulk '03 was too CG. He moved with more fluid movements and had the best human expressions. The muscle tone of the 2nd Hulk was better.

  • 2:29 is wicked !

  • I like Hulk more than The Incredible Hulk and I think Eric was better than Edward

  • i think both were good.

  • eric was well better than edward and hulk was way better the new 1 was too animated

  • YOU CAN SAY THAT AGAIN.

  • almost everything about the new movie was better. the first one was pretty good, but the only parts that was better was Jennifer Connelly as betty ross and the hulk looked more like bruce in the first one.

  • I love the Incredible Hulk-(08) way better then that piece of crap Hulk-(03)! And Edward pulled off Banner much more then Eric.

  • @cesar3hulk both 03 and 08 started out great, and they both sucked in their conclusions, but 08 sucked more. The last fight scene with the monster was just ludicrus.

  • @cesar3hulk Yeaa dude i totally agree with you i thought edward norton wasnt going to pull it off at 1st. but then once i seen the movie is was Great !!!

  • @cesar3hulk Definitely right bout that ! Once i seen edward norton i was thinkin nooo way ! once i seen the work he did total success !

  • I like both of them. They both have their own strengths and weaknesses. But the real question to prove which Hulk is more superior, which Hulk could destroy the Abomintation?

  • I think the answer to your question is the 2003 Hulk. The 2003 HULK WOULD HAMMER THE ABOMINATION WITH A FURIOUS BARRAGE OF BLOWS WITH A DOUBLE DECKER BUS!

  • Hulk 2008 cgi looked fake

  • i thought it looked real more real thtan the playdoh hulk of 2003

  • 2008 looks like it came from a PS2 game

  • 2003 had good CGI for it's time too

  • WTF?? do u have shit in yours eys 2008 LOOKS WAY BETTER!

  • @20avenger07 same here

  • @20avenger07 THE 90'S HULK LOOKED FAKE

  • @20avenger07 Just because they put veins on him? You gotta learn to look deeper than that bud

  • @ARandomCanadian Hulk of 2008 had more than just veins.He looked more like the comics,while Hulk of 2003 looked like a 7FT person who grow even more when angered.WE both know that isn't what the hulk does,do we?Think about,man.

  • @ceneone2000 Hulk didn't have piss yeallow skin.

  • @ARandomCanadian nor did hulk looked similar to banner

  • @ceneone2000 Take another look 2003 hulk's face looks totally different than banner

  • @ARandomCanadian I'm not just talking about 2003 physical looks.Look 2003's mental state I mean, seriously 2003 over there not only acting emotionally sad,but having Banner's memorizes,SOMETHING"S WRONG.

    P.S.: The comics said that since Hulk's transformations are unstable,his skin color might change at times.

  • @ceneone2000 Hulk 2003 was bullet proof like the comics, 2008 wasn't

  • @ARandomCanadian o_o

    Watch the movie

  • @ceneone2000 2008 got his flesh shredded when the helicopter blew up

  • @ARandomCanadian when the helicopter blew up,hulk skin got darker,his flesh never got torn off,only in the Abomination battle his skin torn off

  • @ceneone2000 look again, you need glasses, they were spraying him with bullets when he took the propeller and his flesh was getting shredded

  • Comment removed

  • @ARandomCanadian they had every right to call 2008 "The Incredible Hulk"

  • @ARandomCanadian they bolth have bad cgi

  • @ARandomCanadian ur like a little girl, r u kidding me, it looked real, go try and do something with ur life ok?

  • @RedRex300 The lighting and texture of Hulk 2008 was horrible, it looked like something that came out of a bad video game.

  • both legends

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more