RE: Breakthrough in Earthquake Prediction and Hypertime Mapping?

[spand3244]

I wonder how worried we have to be about the supervolcano in yellowstone right now? Some says its activity has increase over the past years.

[10thdim]

Thanks for clarifying things a little more, John. From your previous video I was imagining that you had uncovered a one-to-one map - now that you had associated x event at x position on the sun with y event at y position on the earth, you finally had a way to superimpose the two maps for future predictions. But if I understand what you're saying here, hypertime mapping makes it much more complicated to predict where an earthquake event will occur without other collaborating factors. Yes?

[astrotometry]

Yes! And what I'm suspecting is that it's a sort of composite mapping, the term hypertime is quite apt for describing it. And it's astounding to see this playing out in our reality as some of us have envisioned theoretically for so long. You can imagine my excitement!

[Internalexpansion]

Hey John, have you considered including the moons relative position to the earth and its 'gravitational' effect on the earth in your earthquake prediction model?

[astrotometry]

In Astrotometry, the association of the moon's orbit with the tides and the effect on earthquake probability is understood as the Moon's relationship to the Earth's translation through hypertime. The moon's "influence" is also "reflected" in the energetic correlation's. Great question. Thanks.

[gadzometer]

Keep observing the holes/flares and the correlation to Earth weather/earthquakes. I look forward to your findings as you map this info over time. Your acceptance of the possibility that it may be a co-incidence give me a lot more faith in your integrity as a researcher. Best of luck and I personally believe that you are onto something. Make sure you check out the New Zealand long term weather prediction site that I sent you a while back. You may be able to add this to your studies.

[LPF767]

We've had a 5.1 earthquake that hit San Diego! Things are changing rapidly now! Love your videos, always very informative.

[LaceyBlue1]

you should see all the activity in california since the 5.1 you refere to....

always shakin there....used to live there...but after tacking quakes for the past week or 2...I would never move back. Start storing up water. : )

[simonodell]

remain objective and skeptical, but keep studying this. Is there a way to falsify this theory?

[astrotometry]

Is there a way to falsify the correlation between perceived planetary movement and the phases of Venus?

As far as I can tell at this point it's just a matter of understanding the mapping. Before it was working out the mechanics of light in the solar system. Now it's the mechanics of matter-energy moving though time-space.

And I'm skeptical. I've either mapped it correctly, I got lucky or a third party populated a geophysical database for shits and grins. Shame that I have to consider this.

[astrotometry]

And you may not realize that I've predicted the general timing and magnitude of dozens of other quakes, but until now I've had to guess on the general locations. If you start at the bottom and read up on core weather you'll see the techniques.

[simonodell]

As far as I know one of the tests of a good theory is that it is falsifyable. A correct theory will stand up to any attempt to falsify it, and thus become accepted because it cannot be refuted. I think you need to think in these terms. You have a working model, that much is clear, now how can we prove it wrong? If your not willing to try, then your not being objective and your not being a true scientist.

[simonodell]

For certainty, others will try and prove it wrong, better to notice the errors (if any) in your thinking before others do and you lose peer-review credibility.

For instance Einstien showed that his theory could be falsified if an observation concerning the gravitional lensing of light showed that light was no effected by gravity. He said if there was no lensing effect relativity would be refuted there and then.

Of course, there was lensing.

You need a similar 'litmus' test.

[simonodell]

Fill in the blank space :

Hypertime Astrotometry cannot be true if ______________

[astrotometry]

As I said before, I can't even completely trust that the data these models are based on is what it is purported to be and that it's not being doctored.

[astrotometry]

I don't see that I have many peers, Simon. And I don't consider most of the persons in the scientific establishment who would be reviewing Astrotometry "credible". Most of them are up to their necks in lies, and most of the ones who realize how deep the shit is are no longer cogent. But who knows, maybe Al Gore will take a look.

[tobiaskelvin]

congrats!

[MaBu888]

Impressive...