Kent Hovind - Why KJV ONLY ??? Why not other versions?

[3VOLution3NO]

FREE KENT HOVIND!

[hortulanus94]

I'm a classical Anglican -- all for the King James Bible as the superior translation! :)

[TangerineGroovin]

Jesus bless Kent!!

free kent jesus!!

[taaronemore74]

Besides all of this, consider the confusion and division created by the flood of versions. Sounds like a tool of Satan to me.

God is not the author of confusion. Gunna stick with the King James.

[vudumojo]

@taaronemore74 Great point, essentially to drown out God's word.

Amen!

[isbemorph]

i just don't understand why Genesis chapters in our true KJV bible are only a few pages, very laconic, while those so called 'pseudepigraphical' scriptures like 'first book of Adam and Eve' contain so much details like God made bodies for Adam and Eve from animal skin, so they can survive in material Earth environment. Its just so fascinating. So either Moses was not inspired to write anything more, or at ll, but having those other scriptures just made a short story.

[vudumojo]

@isbemorph Simple and I think you know the answer but it's simple.

These 'pseudepigraphical' AND 'first book of Adam and Eve' are NOT Scripture. Neither is "1 Enoch" or any of the apocrypha.

APOC'RYPHA

"Literally such things as are not published; but in an appropriate sense, books whose authors are not known; whose authenticity, as inspired writings, is not admitted, and which are therefore not considered a part of the sacred canon of the scripture..."

By definition!

[TheOpendEyes]

Thank you Kent for this and for every information. You helped me more than anyone else to accept Jesus Christ as my Lord and Saviour.

God bless you and your family and to give you strength in this perilous times.

[theveryelect24]

I stopped reading my NIV a long time ago, it's choppy and disjointed. The KJ gives me a warm and comfortable feeling when I read it. It has a natural flow to it that feels almost lyrical.

[eyezopennow]

KJV scares demons

[JasperDale]

the only problem with the KJ only view is that we have found earlier copies which prove the King James version has mistakes in it. there is no 100% perfect translation.

you might check out John Ankerberg's website for further info.

[vudumojo]

@JasperDale Dr. Hovind just explained to you IN THIS VIDEO that EARLIER does not matter.

Watch you video before spouting off.

You message will self destruct in 5 hours if you do not get off your lazy ass and watch and reply.

You looked at the title-came here-and posted without even watching.

Shame on you.

[edwardpf123]

Amen!

[vudumojo]

Exactly, in terms of scrolls, older is definitely not better because it demonstrates they were not used!

Scrolls were constantly used to make new copies constantly. The originals have long ceased to exist. Like Hovind says in this video, just because his JW Bible sitting on the shelf still looks brand new 10 years from and his KJV looks ragged out, that doesn't mean the JW Bible is better. Of course not!

[nickurbina]

awesome.

[EnuffsedTV101]

That's right... Good video! thumbs up and favorited.

[vudumojo]

@EnuffsedTV101 :)