UNITED 93 - CRASHED OR LANDED?

[rog944]

This woman strikes me as a paid actress. It actually wouldn't surprise me at all.

[721508]

rog944. your the expert.

[mskydolphin]

If you love Liberty, If you care about freedom, If you want to know the truth, If you need to see the lies revieled, "The powers, 9/11, 7/7, Cover-ups, The School system and the real biggie, The Mass Media!" Willing to spend some time to learn, even if it takes a few hours or days? Then go to Google Video and watch the series Pt 1,2,3, David Ecke - Freedom to Fascism part 1

[MissOpinionNation]

Regardless of the confusion between the landing .. them saying that U93 crash landed in pennsylvania is a lie. Any of those videos showing the lack of debris are enough for any common sensed individual to see that there isnt a plane there.

So if it didnt land .. where did it really go?

I'm not dumb nor am i blind and when i look at the footage of the "crash site" i see a small crater. The "winglike" holes were already there, as was proven from satelite footage.

So where's the plane?

[721508]

MissOpinionNation. well some goofballs say its in the sea. the satellite image of which you speak was wrong i'm afraid. there are videos on youtube that will put you right on that.

[MrMasidonio]

noone is doubting that a Delta Flight landed in Cleveland also..but what they are saying is that 93 landed also..saying that the delta flight landed does not DISPROVE that 93 landed..it does not make the Loose Change crew look like liars....they also have a quote that United Airlines Officials identified a plane landing at Cleveland Air Port as Flight 93..this video disproves nothing..just shows part of what they were saying in Loose Change to begin with...

[721508]

MrMasidonio. i'm not making loose change crew look like liars, they've basically confirmed there was no landing of flight 93 and the passengers offloaded by omitting the claim. so where are these people who 'supposedly' landed on flight 93?

[MrMasidonio]

i dont know what the loose change crew has said or not.but i watched both and what is in this video does not "disprove" Loose Change.and I donno what happened to the people on 93.thats the thing about this whole 9/11 conspiracies and the others.neither group will ever know the real truth..because we werent there we werent on those planes..one side offers up evidence and then the opposite side offers up evidence.but theres no way that either side can confirm certain "proof" cause WE WERENT THERE.

[721508]

MrMasidonio. i have tim sparkes producer of the latest loose change on audio saying, he agreed to come on board with dylon avery to do the latest loose change, if dylon dropped the more ridiculous, unprovable claims, i.e. the plane dropping off its passengers and ending up at a NASA facility.

[ridgerunner11]

No one questions that D89 landed. The claim is that U73 landed also and the passengers were taken to the NASA facility not the FAA facility. This story is disinformation.

[721508]

ridgerunner11. o.k. whos spreading the disinformation? The NASA facility is an unproven theory and recognised by a certain mr tim sparkes producer and distributer of the latest loose change. Tim sparkes said to dylon avery he would have to drop this claim of the NASA facility because it couldn't be proven. if tim sparkes reconises its unprovable, why don't you?

[krispykreme82603]

its UA93, not 73. UA93 NEVER touched down in Cleveland. What the conspiracy theorists got a hold of was the wrong story that a hi-jacked plane landed in cleveland, and they automatically assumed they meant UA93, when in fact it was DL89 and it wasnt really even hijacked

[WraithGod]

Erm, in Loose Change it states that there were two entirely different jets grounded around the same time, with different numbers of passengers, different diversion paths for passengers, and different unloading times, to name a few.

[721508]

WraithGod. And your point is? Loose change says its flight 93 doesn't it?

[MrMasidonio]

yeah they say its flight 93 and that its this Delta flight! they didnt say ONLY ONE PLANE LANDED AND IT WAS 93..no they say two planes landed...try harder to convince me next time!

[721508]

MusicFare. what exactly is it that you don't get. conspiracy theorists on the day said flight 93 had landed not crashed. D89 had landed not flight 93. is that to difficult. as for the BBC making it so what! Dylon Avery made 'loose change'. if your trying to say one is biased you must except the other is also!

[MusicFare]

Who made this??

BBC?

I can't believe I got a message, saying to watch this to try and prove me wrong

Yea the plane was diverted. Wtf does that mean?? He said (and this is one news report guy that reported in a split second clip) "the plane was not hijacked it was diverted here"

What?

[lone4444]

Hey, dipshit-it's the BBC--NOT FOX!

You obviously know nothing of the BBC's policies, they have broken many high profile stories and have ended many futures over corruption. They are beholden to no one.

You are just VERY STUPID.

[721508]

MistaEks. So because the BBC made this their biased? by the same logic Al Manar who reported that jews were tipped off not to go to work on 911 are also biased as it proved not to be the case. jews did die!

[721508]

MistaEks. So she didn't know what flight she was on?

[MistaEks]

Of course the 'wifey' knew what flight she was on. It's irrelevant to the essence of the conspiracy case as to whether F93 was mistaken for hers or not. Never think the BBC are incapable of being impartial.

[MistaEks]

That 'Mrs Smith' so misinformed its sad. Sorry people but this has got nothing to do with the essence of the case against the Yankee Doodle government.

[ConservativeVoiceUSA]

Thanks for sharing this video with us. The Conspiracy Theorist are a bunch of nuts! 5/5

[SlimeBuster]

The Conspiracy Theorist won't accept her, like she says, it goes on and on. Conspiracy Theorist will invent a new lie and say she is paid by the government or something.

Great Post ^5