osama is dead.. america cant say this because people will say you got your man,so stop the war....convinced...replys wont change my mind..AOOWWWW!!!..muuhahahahaa!!
I have no proof, but i dont think Osama Bin Laden is alive. I think he died few yrs ago. But USA keep his spectre around because he serves a political purpose.
hehe reminds me of the old g.i. joe cartoon. they never catch cobra commander need him around for the next episode...
1 The worlds oldest democracy, USA, is now sponosirng the ME's oldest Democracy of Israel in systemic WAR CRIMES in direct contravention vis-a-vis UN Chartered Courrse of UNGA 181 which is an Article 80 Terms Resolution of being GUARANTEEING the Palestinian native popukaition their human & nations rights of being NON-MODIFIABLE.
2 Where are all the other world democracies? Euroepans are also sponsoring Israel War Crimes!
those are added reasons and ones you like to hang on to.the breaking of the cease fire gave us justification to take him out for the invasion of kuwait clinton was just too busy getting bj's from the fat girl in the mail room to do anything about it.the final UN resolution regarding iraq gave us full right to take him out also you cant deny those two facts,they exist so you can tie whatever you want to the war: wmd's,oil,rvenge for daddy,etc. none of it matters, we already had justification.
can you fucking read moron? seriously did i not say we already had justification to go to war. yes i remember the wmd hearings. i remember clinton, russia, england and anyone else with a brain saying he had wmd's also because he had them in 98 documented by UN inspectors. we didnt go in based on wmd's that was just a talking point that was unneccessary because we already had justification. wmds didnt matter. can u read that? we already had justification to end the cease fire with iraq.
let me ask this since u want to ignore everything else and focus on wmd's. if clinton did what he should have which was end the cease fire after the first time saddam broke it, what would you be whining about right now? nothing. because we would have used the justification we had to end the cease fire, no talk of wmd's. the wmd's dont matter and you just dont like hearing that. if clinton ended the cease fire and took away your ability to whine about wmd's, youd have no arguement.
ITS NOT focusing on WMD which is a peripheral issue but your claim that it was REVISIONIST history.
Saddam's chemcial weapons included Anthrax of which only USA, Israel & Iraq had posession of the USA Antrhax genome that was used as to attack the USA
It was NOT any Arab nor muslim becasue if there was one iota of evidence: Neo-cons would have gone ape-shit of "talking point [your words] to justify attacking another country
Can you explain why 1500 Israel students were deported after?
My statements which I state were ADDRESSING A SPECIFIC POINT "revisionist" : Your Statement: " this piece is revisionist history saying we went to iraq for wmd's when bush..."
My statements are founded upon meeting:
1 UN Charter Article 51 "...Measures taken by members in the excercise of this right of self-defense shall be reproted to the Security Council..."
Its not a secret Saddam had chemical weapons: Bush41 SOLD them to Saddam.
it was reagan, not bush get your facts straight, and the documented weapons he had in 98 were not ours and their shelf life makes it impossible to be ours anyway. and saying we went to war over wmd's IS revisionist history as i am trying to show you we already had alot of legal reasons to end the cease fire and invade iraq but people still hang on the wmd thing. it makes no diff. clinton could have invaded iraq and no one would be whining over the wmd's. anthrax? thats been solved, get updated.
Shelf Life? Shows how much you know about CBRN weapons. Do you think that weapons are armed & ready to go 24/7?
UN Report stated that Iraq's weapons had been destroyed or were in rendered inactive of which US personnel were on part of the UN Inspectors.
Lets apply your reasoning: if Bush 41 on his watch then there would have removed Saddam to remove 13 years later. WHAT was that which 7you call a "ceasefire" for 13 years?
i cant even comprehend what the hell your asking. your history in your head is so fucked up you cant even answer a simple question that i have asked you time and again without getting off track.if clinton had done what he should have and ended the cease fire and invaded iraq after the very first infarction, what would your arguement be then? you cry on every video you post in about us going to war over wmd's, im trying to show you the wmd's meant shit,whether he had them or not iraq was fucked.
holy crap more propaganda from linktv how quickly the world forgets that saddam invaded kuwait and broke the cease fire hundreds of times and scammed the oil for food program. that gave us full right to end the cease fire and return to invading iraq, which bush talked about before his first election. this piece is revisionist history saying we went to iraq for wmd's when bush clearly threatened iraq before he was elected.wmd's were not the only reason, nor was it even needed.
mysticx0, You're correct no country needed a reason to wage war on Saddambecasue his systemic contravention to UNSCR's was suffiicent.
SELF-SAME: No country needs a reason to wage war VS Israel for its systemic contravetnion to UNSCR's that have crosses the threshold into PON VI (c) Crimes Against Humanity.
HISTORICAL RECORD: Bush43 Admn did state at the UNSC that the reason was Saddam's WMD.
911 was a direct result of USA sponsorship t for Isrsael War Crimes.
ok lets just go with that for a minute.how many countries with serious intelligence and who looked at the UN inspected weapons came out and said saddam didnt have them?now how many said he did.every arrow pointed to saddam having them and still producing them and we werent going to let another group get gassed like the kurds to be sure.gassing the kurds is enough of a reason to invade iraq plus defying the final un resolution and kicking out the inspectors.but i guess the kurds dont matter 2 u.
holy cow you just do not get it. go look at some more dancing asses moron and stop trying to delve into things you dont understand.
you can talk til your blue in the face, whining on every video you post in about us going to war over wmd's is revisionist histroy. your saying that is why we went to war. we didnt "go to war" we ended a cease fire. big difference. we had years worth of justification. so why r u even bringing up wmd's? your hinging your anger on something that didnt matter.
osama is dead.. america cant say this because people will say you got your man,so stop the war....convinced...replys wont change my mind..AOOWWWW!!!..muuhahahahaa!!
bear24rock 1 year ago
Whats funny is Bin Laden makes more sense when he talks then Bush ever did.
Sean8033 2 years ago
Thats true Sean,cause Bin Laden is even though he is a murderer and terrorist way smarter than Mr.Bush.
excellence1987 2 years ago
I have no proof, but i dont think Osama Bin Laden is alive. I think he died few yrs ago. But USA keep his spectre around because he serves a political purpose.
hehe reminds me of the old g.i. joe cartoon. they never catch cobra commander need him around for the next episode...
megatron0357 2 years ago
TRUTH OF CONTEXT:
1 The worlds oldest democracy, USA, is now sponosirng the ME's oldest Democracy of Israel in systemic WAR CRIMES in direct contravention vis-a-vis UN Chartered Courrse of UNGA 181 which is an Article 80 Terms Resolution of being GUARANTEEING the Palestinian native popukaition their human & nations rights of being NON-MODIFIABLE.
2 Where are all the other world democracies? Euroepans are also sponsoring Israel War Crimes!
vistavision2 2 years ago
Bin Laden has moved to Muslim region stat of China Xinjian´s city- Oromchi- But US admistration has no balls to follow him !
fardavari 2 years ago
And how do you know that?
actionj111 2 years ago
u dont know? he has a top secret information ticker tape he pulls out of his ass. go ahead ask him something else.
megatron0357 2 years ago
Lies lead to wars!
jeri114 2 years ago 3
Like a usedcar salesman of "bait & switch", Bush43 Admn presented following justification for war VS Iraq:
1 WMD: UN itself certified there was none
2 Democracy for the Middle East: When Hamas candidates were elected international monitors, the USA sponsored an Abbas Coup against it
3 Saddam was working with Al Queda: Fact that Bin Laden offered to depose Saddam whom he hated as an apostate
4 Secure Middle East Peace: Then Sanctioned more Israel War Crimes settlements.
vistavision2 2 years ago
those are added reasons and ones you like to hang on to.the breaking of the cease fire gave us justification to take him out for the invasion of kuwait clinton was just too busy getting bj's from the fat girl in the mail room to do anything about it.the final UN resolution regarding iraq gave us full right to take him out also you cant deny those two facts,they exist so you can tie whatever you want to the war: wmd's,oil,rvenge for daddy,etc. none of it matters, we already had justification.
mysticx0 2 years ago
mystixx0, You claimed revision.
Did or did not the Bush43 Admn at UN state it was WMD?
I rember watching SECSTATE Powell bring bring out imagery & some nice drawings.
So your telling us that did nit happen?
You should work for Netanyahu who iarfter revising history is now re-writning Torah !
vistavision2 2 years ago
can you fucking read moron? seriously did i not say we already had justification to go to war. yes i remember the wmd hearings. i remember clinton, russia, england and anyone else with a brain saying he had wmd's also because he had them in 98 documented by UN inspectors. we didnt go in based on wmd's that was just a talking point that was unneccessary because we already had justification. wmds didnt matter. can u read that? we already had justification to end the cease fire with iraq.
mysticx0 2 years ago
let me ask this since u want to ignore everything else and focus on wmd's. if clinton did what he should have which was end the cease fire after the first time saddam broke it, what would you be whining about right now? nothing. because we would have used the justification we had to end the cease fire, no talk of wmd's. the wmd's dont matter and you just dont like hearing that. if clinton ended the cease fire and took away your ability to whine about wmd's, youd have no arguement.
mysticx0 2 years ago
ITS NOT focusing on WMD which is a peripheral issue but your claim that it was REVISIONIST history.
Saddam's chemcial weapons included Anthrax of which only USA, Israel & Iraq had posession of the USA Antrhax genome that was used as to attack the USA
It was NOT any Arab nor muslim becasue if there was one iota of evidence: Neo-cons would have gone ape-shit of "talking point [your words] to justify attacking another country
Can you explain why 1500 Israel students were deported after?
vistavision2 2 years ago
My statements which I state were ADDRESSING A SPECIFIC POINT "revisionist" : Your Statement: " this piece is revisionist history saying we went to iraq for wmd's when bush..."
My statements are founded upon meeting:
1 UN Charter Article 51 "...Measures taken by members in the excercise of this right of self-defense shall be reproted to the Security Council..."
Its not a secret Saddam had chemical weapons: Bush41 SOLD them to Saddam.
vistavision2 2 years ago
it was reagan, not bush get your facts straight, and the documented weapons he had in 98 were not ours and their shelf life makes it impossible to be ours anyway. and saying we went to war over wmd's IS revisionist history as i am trying to show you we already had alot of legal reasons to end the cease fire and invade iraq but people still hang on the wmd thing. it makes no diff. clinton could have invaded iraq and no one would be whining over the wmd's. anthrax? thats been solved, get updated.
mysticx0 2 years ago 2
Mysticx0, Who was Reagon's VP? Same Bush41.
Shelf Life? Shows how much you know about CBRN weapons. Do you think that weapons are armed & ready to go 24/7?
UN Report stated that Iraq's weapons had been destroyed or were in rendered inactive of which US personnel were on part of the UN Inspectors.
Lets apply your reasoning: if Bush 41 on his watch then there would have removed Saddam to remove 13 years later. WHAT was that which 7you call a "ceasefire" for 13 years?
vistavision2 2 years ago
i cant even comprehend what the hell your asking. your history in your head is so fucked up you cant even answer a simple question that i have asked you time and again without getting off track.if clinton had done what he should have and ended the cease fire and invaded iraq after the very first infarction, what would your arguement be then? you cry on every video you post in about us going to war over wmd's, im trying to show you the wmd's meant shit,whether he had them or not iraq was fucked.
mysticx0 2 years ago 2
holy crap more propaganda from linktv how quickly the world forgets that saddam invaded kuwait and broke the cease fire hundreds of times and scammed the oil for food program. that gave us full right to end the cease fire and return to invading iraq, which bush talked about before his first election. this piece is revisionist history saying we went to iraq for wmd's when bush clearly threatened iraq before he was elected.wmd's were not the only reason, nor was it even needed.
mysticx0 2 years ago
mysticx0, You're correct no country needed a reason to wage war on Saddambecasue his systemic contravention to UNSCR's was suffiicent.
SELF-SAME: No country needs a reason to wage war VS Israel for its systemic contravetnion to UNSCR's that have crosses the threshold into PON VI (c) Crimes Against Humanity.
HISTORICAL RECORD: Bush43 Admn did state at the UNSC that the reason was Saddam's WMD.
911 was a direct result of USA sponsorship t for Isrsael War Crimes.
vistavision2 2 years ago
ok lets just go with that for a minute.how many countries with serious intelligence and who looked at the UN inspected weapons came out and said saddam didnt have them?now how many said he did.every arrow pointed to saddam having them and still producing them and we werent going to let another group get gassed like the kurds to be sure.gassing the kurds is enough of a reason to invade iraq plus defying the final un resolution and kicking out the inspectors.but i guess the kurds dont matter 2 u.
mysticx0 2 years ago 2
Your all over the place: The issue that I addressed was YOUR calling it "revisionist" and NOTHING ELSE!!!
Either USA did or did not raise the issue of WMD at the UN as reason for re-igniting the war?
HISTORICAL RECORD: SECSTATE Powell was at UN which REFUTES your claim.
The issue is of CREDIBILITY on FACTS!!!
SIMPLE: Your claim vis-a-vis historical record.
My 1st statement [READ IT] states that USA did not need a reason to wage war as UNSCR contravention is sufficient.
vistavision2 2 years ago
holy cow you just do not get it. go look at some more dancing asses moron and stop trying to delve into things you dont understand.
you can talk til your blue in the face, whining on every video you post in about us going to war over wmd's is revisionist histroy. your saying that is why we went to war. we didnt "go to war" we ended a cease fire. big difference. we had years worth of justification. so why r u even bringing up wmd's? your hinging your anger on something that didnt matter.
mysticx0 2 years ago
The difference is that if you can't admit what is FACT then your credibility is worth ZERO.
You cannot discuss a subject without insulting me personally like some 12 year old going through puberty.
USA is not a cop that addresses "infractions" which is a traffic ticket.
This is only one video & it is YOU who are whining "about us going to war over wmd's is revisionist histroy" .
The only one fucked is YOU: In your head. It wasn't rape but consensual!
vistavision2 2 years ago