Scott Walker Endorsed By Thousands of Grassroots Conservatives at Republican State Convention

[dftrev1]

I was all for Scott Walker until recently when he came out againt the Arizona immagration law. within 24 hrs he changed his mind, just like the Bleeding Heart Liberals Due.  We do not need someone that cannot come out on the side of his party right out of the gate. CAN HE REALLY BE TRUSTED? I WONDER!! We want honisty right from the git go!

[TheBeardOfPower]

@dftrev1 You know what? Based on what I'd heard people in BOTH parties try to claim, I was against it at first too.

Then i read it and it changed my mind REAL fast.

Ever occur to you that maybe he did that? If what you say is even true...

[dftrev1]

@TheBeardOfPower What I say is true, but that is not the point, to be an effective leader one should read First, open mouth later. Then you will never have to say you are sorry..

I am sorry that you did the same thing as Scott.

[TheBeardOfPower]

@dftrev1 For about four hours until I actually found a place online where i can read it, yeah.

I'm sorry you seem to think that party loyalty is all that matters.

[dftrev1]

@TheBeardOfPower Until it is read the lips should stay together. Now where did I said that pary loyalty is all that matters?, that being said, it is. I do not want to get in a hissy contest with some one that does not know me and that I do not know. I have been involved in the Republican Party at County level, State level and National level for the past 47 years. All I say is, do not comment on what you do not KNOW, read the bill FIRST. Thank you sir, you do sound like a DEMOCRAT..

[TheBeardOfPower]

@dftrev1 You know what's funny?

It's usually the Left who casts judgement on people they don't know.

Also love how you're leaving out little details, like he actually took the time to contact the writers and sponsors of the bill itself, or the fact that he was concerned whether the Constitution ALLOWED a State to pass such a law under the 10th Amendment.

[TheBeardOfPower]

@dftrev1 And guess what? After calling them up themselves, after researching the law on such matters, he was astisifed that his stated CONCERNS were met and said he'd be proud to sign it himself.

Or would you prefer a hardened party-line touting jackass that can't admoit he's wrong? Sounds like YOU want the Dem, sir, not me. But hey, I don't know you, so I can't really make any accusations, can I?