This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ProVeterans2010 My, it is sad that your channel cannot be found to back up these allegations, and it is me that you are talking about. Send me your address so that I may press charges on you for slandering my name.
And oh yes, I'm a bad boy, I have two felonies for driving offenses, and the records are public, but you are by far in the wrong.
Do you dare to tell me who you are, as you are speaking to the horses mouth...
Show some guts...and come out from hiding, yellowbelly!
@MaxCandor If you have a criminal record, you can press charges all you want, beard guy. He has every right to expose you to people who need to know this stuff.
@MaxCandor Hey bud, we did some checking, since you made a big deal of your 'innocence' we know that you have considerably more than two driving felonies.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ProVeterans2010 Moreover, does being a felon, and one of a non-violent crime, driving offenses, make it so that I cannot stand for my state, country or Constitution?
I shared my record," by the way" with the NH reps... and they knew "who" they were dealing with.
Go ahead CCAllen, you are co-intel. It seems that whenever I am hovering over the target, you show up.
Surely you care not about the USA, so join all of the other haters, and go.
@RemoveIllegals12 Ah, now you are showing your colors. Sad that you are worried about whom I accuse, though I was the one slandered with false allegations.
Been stalked b4 you know, and the first bit of info that I can use to press charges, I will use. The last times I was too nice and dropped them, but this time I won't stop, or forget; and I will press charges, with the confirmed assistance of many NH Reps.
I have all the info I need from b4, so go ahead, and try me...
@MaxCandor so, you're a felon and you want to press charges because someone said you're a fellon? it's not against the law, as a matter of fact, the guy HAD an obligation to make others aware what he knows Do you live on this planet?
This is an important issue, yet -- you don't post the video on your channel; no need for the old crowd to see, huh?
@TheLyingTube2009 Let me be blunt, code law and Constitutional law are very different. Code law deems that one requires permission from the govt to travel, I've disagreed and traveled. So they locked me up, does that mean I'm wrong?
Show me where in the Constitution it says that "The people's travel shall be regulated." It doesn't...
If you feel that permission must be attained from the govt to do as you wish, while not harming another, you are 1 programmed and lead sheep.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ProVeterans2010 And one last thing that I need to ask you... CO-INTEL TROLL, how many other youtube names can you throw at me this time? (Remember usa 180?)
YT Folks, (Especially from NH) watch the drama, and save the comments and videos... and I will expose this idiot.
Please let me know who you are, troll, so that I can sue you...Co-intel...
Your lies have no weight with NH folks, they know me...and you don't.....
@MaxCandor If you have a criminal record it might not be all that good of an idea to slam the guy. And IF you lied 'bout your record only being "non-violent" driving offenses, they will find out.
@RemoveIllegals12 Do you mean that "you wished that you had something to hand, to the Obummer crowd?"
My record is as I stated, I've got nothing to hide; and the Reps have known me for many years, and like me they know that this is all someones B.S. and drivel.
I am moved only to laughter... is this all they have got? Sad...
@TheLyingTube2009 BO has violated the Constitution with regularity, and I have violated code laws, which is very different.
I have broken an illegal law, Constitutionally speaking. It is the duty of every person who wishes to retain his/her freedom and rights to "Non-violently" violate unlawful laws.
Please refute this... and show me your true colors.
Assassinating my character will not divide or stop the course of this mission, but it tells us loudly, which side you are on..
@ProVeterans2010 Do you take those peeps who read this to be fools? As you state, "I have been fighting against the illegal usurper for a long time." Funny the way that you fight, by character assassination and division of people with the same objectives. Just whose side are you on?
In NH, when one is arrested, charged in court or incarcerated, it is publicized; and records are easily found. My conscience is clear.
Constitutionally, peeps are pro or con, which do you work for?
The motivations of these people are purely racially motivated! You can attempt to dress it up as a constitutional concern, but in the end the true sinister motivations are clear. If it was a White president of European descent, there would be no questions raised about eligibility. What a sad bunch of useless folks!
@TheBiotchify That's bull. This is not racially motivated whatsoever. This is American-motivated. This is Constitutionally motivated. Regardless of what you may -think- people's motivations are, HOW MUCH MORE FRIGHTENING IS IT THAT THE GOVT IS WILLING TO COVER IT UP???????? These men are worried about bigger issues than race: IE CORRUPTION.
@PrivationProductions Where were you and the other "Constitutionalist" when G.W. Bush stole the election in Florida? When black voters were turned away at the polls and purged thousands of mainly minority votes, I heard nothing from you folks! The screening process for the presidency of the US is the most intense of any in the world! This is about a black man with a Muslim name to boot that became president and some just can't handle that!
@TheBiotchify I didn't like Bush, but at least he met the eligibility requirements. How hard is it to understand it doesn't matter what the motivations are on this issue, it's about whether the law is being broken. How can you be hypocritical and accuse Bush of violating our rights when Obama is doing the same thing? I voted Obama, and I'm smart enough to regret it.
@PrivationProductions I believe that your motivations are sincere, however I do not feel the same about other who make that argument. I also voted for Obama and also regret it. I was not defending him per say, but rather challenging what the motivations of "birther" movement. I wish that Ron Paul could get the nomination, but the deck seems to stacked against him! If he does not get the nomination, I will not vote!
@TheBiotchify It is unfortunate, but we must use the same tactic that Ron Paul seems to be using, which is: play the conspirator's game against them. "Racists" (i.e. White Nationalists) have been on the "correct side" of conspiracy theory for a long time. It is unfortunate, but we cannot deny the good things they say because they have said bad things before. They are not entirely incorrect when they see a conspiracy against their race, it just so happens their racism helped them see it first.
@TheBiotchify but have discernment with what i said. I am not accusing every birther or anti-NWO'r of racism. I think they are rightly concerned over matters of their nation, their rights, their properties, and yes, their race. However, I think racial concerns are not the primary motivator. Sheer logic dictates there is something fishy when the supreme court backs an unconstitutional ruling, and when they call the document obsolete, which one judge did recently.
To be President of the USA, Obama must be a "natural born citizen" according to the Constitution of the USA and it requires 2 conditions:
1) Obama must be born in the USA.
2) Obama's parents MUST BOTH be American citizens.
Obama's father was NEVER an American citizen!
Therefore OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA!
Check "The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth" at puzo1.blogspot.com
Skip to Time Mark: 5:14 - According to the federal Constitution "No one but a Natural Born Citizen may be President of the United States"; while the Supreme Court & a Senate Resolution declared that, "a Natural Born Citizen" is one in which either *BOTH* parents were born in one of the several states or who are citizens of the United States".
For the love of our federal constitutional republic, uphold your state & federal constitution. Stop Election Fraud! Obama is ineligible to hold office!
Kindly notice that the lawyer representing this case is Dr Orly Taitz; who holds herself out as Dr Orly Taitz, ESQUIRE. So, what's an "Esquire"? In the United States, the suffix Esq. most commonly designates individuals licensed to practice law, and may be used by both men and women. So, who can practice law? In most states, only those who have passed "The Bar" may practice law. So, what's "The Bar Association"? Read this: healthfreedom. info/BAR%20Association. htm
I am so glad I renounced my US citizenship & burned my US passport. NDAA is law. FEMA camps are open and Americans are doomed. Get out while you can. There is NO US Constitution at this point.
Voting machines are hacked; Vote by absentee ballot to make sure there is a paper trail of your vote that can be RECOUNTED and ensure your vote is not STOLEN by some computer program! Then if there is any discrepancy, we can compare what they say Ron Paul received and what he really received!
We all know that Obama is ineligible. That said he must not be allowed on the ballot for the office of the Presidency in any State or Possession of the United States. Every bill , every executive order , every rule or judgement by the administration or any agency thereof is therefore null and void. Criminal charges must follow. We also know that Obama never legally changed his name from Soetoro. There fore when he took the oath of office , he committed a fraud.
For those viewers of this and related videos, specifically those who are having difficulty getting the underlying cause of the mysteries surrounding the routine usurpations of our original, organic constitution, we seriously implore you to go to the internet on Google to search: Act of 1871 pdf so you can conduct your research in the areas no one in "government" is willing to tell you. We have nothing resembling what we had at the time of the birth of this great nation.
As usual, radical left-wing, anti-constitutional, and Liberal/Progressive operatives of GraniteStateProgress are attempting to embarrass law abiding people for upholding the Constitution. This is especially troubling since Obama is threat to our people.
These Representatives, and these people, especially Dick Marple, deserve the admiration and respect of every American who struggles to uphold the Constitutions. AG Delaney is a disgrace. He is a great example for why we need the stranglehold of the BAR Association out of our government.
@SunlightDisinfects Well and good, but what if your rulers are all-powerful don't respect the law, then what? Freedom is backed not by fine words, but by action. And don't get me wrong, they're all fine words. Just don't confuse them with "inalienable rights".
James Madison, who WROTE the Constitution, said that the children of aliens who are born in the United States are still natural-born citizens of the United States.
No, it was not. Vattel's "Law of Nations" is not a legal document in the United States. It's simply a book. It is not and never was part of the Constitution, and to claim it is marks you as insane.
That's the voice of entitlement singing the song of defeat and death.
The Declaration of Independence is the Law of this land only if the people themselves break the chain of obediance and assert our rights before we lose them altogether.
No document can do for the people what they must do for themselves, in any generation, anywhere.
I share your sentiment, though not your confidence in words.
@MyFreedomChannel You need to spread this video to everyone you know and get everyone to call your reps and get them to serve papers to the attorney general requesting an immediate investigation. I have a feeling here in Louisiana we are already onboard with this because i see senator vitter dislikes obama a lot and im sure he will be glad to get involved.
@absoluteanatomy1 The last I knew, our state AG was looking into this, but it's going to be difficult to get our Lt. Governor David Dewhurst on board; he killed the anti-TSA bill in our Senate with backroom intimidation. From what I've been told by people in my area, we're going to have an uphill battle b/c of that. But I will do my best. Thanks! :)
@MyFreedomChannel Yeah i heard about that, that was very unconstitutional of him. If Rick Perry really wanted to prove himself to the people further he should fire Senator Dewhurst, he would probably earn support away from rick santorum and mitt romney right away, but don't worry about Dewhurst, just spread this video to everyone you know and tell them to spread it because it is very important and the more people that raise hell about it the more of a priority it will be for them to address it!
There is not and has never been any law suggesting that both parents have to be citizens for a person to be a natural-born citizen. Everyone born in the United States is a natural-born citizen, and anybody who claims otherwise belongs in an insane asylum.
@RedXlV Actually, the SCOTUS found in two different cases that being a natural born citizen is defined as having two parents of US citizenship. Check the facts!
No, the Supreme Court has never found any such thing. There has never been a case before the Supreme Court about the definition of a natural-born citizen. The reason for that is simple: the ONLY place anywhere in US law where it makes any difference whether a citizen is "natural-born" is the qualifications for the presidency. Since the Supreme Court has never heard a case challenging anybody's eligibility to be President, they've never ruled on the issue.
@RedXlV - On the contrary, you may want to do a bit more research on that issue before you misspeak again. Although the office of POTUS is the only government office that requires the holder to be a "natural born citizen" government held positions are not the only areas in this country where "natural born citizenship" is a concern. With that in mind, the US Supreme Court has in fact heard no less than four cases where it has defined the term "natural born citizen".
@RedXlV The Supreme court first set Prescience on this in 1875 in the Minor Vs. Hapersett. There is not a lower court (that legally can overturn this) The courts were in error not hearing the case. this is being corrected as the case is moving forward.
Minor v Hapersett does not, in fact, say anything about natural-born citizenship or presidential eligibility. The issue before the court in that case was whether it was constitutional to deny some citizens the right to vote. The Supreme Court ruled that it was in fact constitutional to do so. Since courts are not ALLOWED to rule on anything other than the actual case they're hearing at the time, not only did Minor v Hapersett not define "natural-born citizen", it COULDN'T.
@RedXlV Again you missed what I said there is a court willing to hear the case this is happening for the first time since people have brought up the issue, and Minor vs. Happersett is at the center of this case. Google this article (I am sure you will find more with ease)
Court to hear Obama eligibility challenge on merits, first time
So where is the court that's willing to hear it? You claiming there is one doesn't make it so.
And Minor v. Hapersett didn't say that a natural-born citizen has to have two parents who are citizens. It said that anybody born in the US with two citizens as parents is a US citizen, but said nothing about that being the DEFINITION of natural-born.
@RedXlV Georiga and Minor vs Happerstt said A child born of TWO citizens is a citizen of the country of their parents regardless of the place of birth.
@RedXlV Thought I told you this and even told you what to Google for the info. However, Georgia is willing to hear it. Google--- Georgia to hear case of Obama's eligibility. you will find plenty of results
@RedXlV What do you think "citizen(S) as parent(S)" means? Apparently, you don't comprehend that when you put an "s" at the end of such words as "citizen(s) & parent(s) that it means TWO (2) in this instance. That IS the definition of natural-born citizen!!! DUHHH
If he’s found guilty of fraud, and legally ineligible, then what about his illegally appointed cabinet? (CONSTITUTIONALLY, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MUST BE “REBOOTED” WITH A NEW ADMINISTRATION)
Aren’t they ineligible to succeed him without a general election? (YES, THAT MAKES BIDEN AND CLINTON, ET AL, ILLEGAL OFFICE HOLDERS, TOO)
Aren’t all the laws he signed into effect also disqualified? (YES)
@RedXlV Folks who proclaim their amazement publicly demonstrate their own naivete and credulity.
Me, I am almost never surprised or amazed, and least of all by anything anyone says or writes.
I see two possibilities for you:
Crawl back under whatever rock call your own and hope no else asks questions near you, or grow up and face the possibility the something important eludes you.
Last word from Supreme Court: 1875, Minor v Happersett: "Natural Born Citizen” was defined as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law ... it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.” Obama's dad not U.S. citizen.
@lvgolden Last word from the supreme court apart from the rest of the paragraph, Wong Kim Ark and the rejection of the appeals of 15 birther lawsuits....
Lets look at what Vattel actually wrote, shall we?
212. Les Citoyens sont les membres de la Société Civile: Liés à cette Société par certains devoirs, & sourmis à son Autorité, il participent avec égalité à ses avantages. Les Naturels, ou Indigènes sont ceux qui sont nés dans le pays, de Parens Citoyens. La Société ne pouvant se soutenir & se perpétuer que par les enfans des Citoyens; ces enfans y suivent naturellement la conditionn de leurs Pères, & entrent dans tous leurs droits.
@SunlightDisinfects Vattel used the term PARENS not PARENTS. Parens means BLOOD RELATIVES not parents in french, you shmuck. Also the line where law of Nations is metioned in the constitution "Of Offenses against the Law of Nations" was the title of Blackstone treatise, Book 4, Chapter 5, dealing with Piracy. Guess what that line in the constitution deals with? Piracy.
Guess what Blackstone thought of citizenship? Birth on soil regardless of parents.
@RedXlV Agreed. I was just posting the original french to so show how ridiculous these people saying "Oh Vattel said this" etc. Vattel is a fairly important figure in the development of mainland European law, but He flat out stated that his rules don't apply in English law, which is the basis of American Common law.
@SunlightDisinfects Thank You Sunligh. I have to get on with my lifs and must pull away from Youtube. this is the case and it was set forth for a solid and sound reason. Our founding Fathers wanted the Republic to be sound and protect the freedom of the people and they saw a person's citizenship and the Presidency as a possible threat to the freedom of the people.
@Naterz100 "That provision in the constitution which requires that the president shall be a native-born citizen (unless he were a citizen of the United States when the constitution was adopted,) is a happy means of security against foreign influence, which, where-ever it is capable of being exerted, is to be dreaded more than the plague." St. George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries 1:App. 316--25, 328--29
year 1803
They were concerned, which is why they used birthright citizenship.
@jjoshaugh here is the truth before I get back. I did not support Obama and his ideas in 08. I do not support him now. it has nothing to do with birth and has every thing to do with his Ideas his friends his influences and his desire to destroy something that did and has worked. After he took office I have opposed almost everything he has done because it is the wrong direction for the country top that with even more associations such as ACORN and the Black Panthers. see part 2
@Naterz100 therefor I am behind this or any other move to remove him. As I said don't feel bad I think we need to remove more than Obama and his appointees. Anyone who supported the NDAA needs to go John Bohnner needs to go anyone offering support for the SOPA needs to go. I don't care how as long as they face charges for their crimes. Obama is only one step in the process of restoring the Republic our founder's willed to us.
@Naterz100 Just because you don't support someone's ideas does not mean you turn around and pretend the law is something its not so that you can pretend he is not really the President. That's the action of a child. I don't give a rats ass what you think of his beliefs, the guy is entitled to sit in the oval office and there's 200 years of law backing that up. If you don't like him, volunteer for and donate to his opposition and VOTE.
@jjoshaugh I do not believe he is legal. There is a court willing to listen to this case at hand. As to voting it is our last recourse of peaceful action to restore our republic I will continue to vote. Yet feel there is no viable candidate to restore the republic. The truth is with the NDAA we can look into a number of our non representing representatives and Impeach Convict and in some cases hang or imprison for life the traitors to this country. Obama is one of them.
You "do not believe he is legal", you say? That makes you a MORON. Obama is the President of the United States, no matter how much you wish he wasn't.
@RedXlV Well there is a court willing to listen to this case. So there must be enough evidence to at least question him. This is the responsibility of every American Citizen We need to question our leaders it is part of what makes the republic work. Legal or not he has been a disaster to the country, passing missile defense plans to the Russians wanting to negotiate with the Taliban and lets not forget that pesky debt. If you look at my other comments they all need to go not just Obama
You can believe he's a "disaster" all you want. You're entitled to your own opinion. You are not, however, entitled to your own facts. Obama is the legal, legitimately elected President of the United States. Your disapproval does not change that fact. And if there's a court willing to listen to this case, where is it? Every court that's had a Birther lawsuit brought before it has dismissed them as baseless, frivolous, and a complete waste of the court's time.
here is one more how about remove him for treason . Google The Washington Times and read "Inside the Ring". I do believe that Treason is a reason to Impeach and possibly imprison Obama. In any regard it makes him ineligible to hold the office making him not capable of holding the seat. This is not about law it is about political will to uphold the law. this is why we need to toss almost all of them out and start over.
@SunlightDisinfects That explains why Vattel was the 26th most cited legal scholar in the Congrelional debates, after Machiavelli. And not one of those places he was cited dealt with citizenship Lord Blackstone was the 4th most cited source, and Blackstone believed in Birthright citizenship and was cited on citizenhip.
Are you just going to CTRL+V shit or are you going to actually argue a case. Not that there is one.
It is clear that Obama does not qualify to be on the ballot for the presidency of the United States. He is not a natural born citizen, since his father was never a U.S. citizen. It's ironic that McCain's qualification to run for the presidency was questioned and even went to a hearing. Why was Obama allowed to be on the ballot in 2008? Why no hearing on his qualification?
@jjoshaugh A natural born citizen refers to one who is born in the U.S. (or a U.S. territory) and whose parents (both) are citizens of the U.S. Obama's father was never a citizen of the U.S. End of case. Obama should not have been on the ballot in 2008. Do some research.
@lvgolden If you had read the comments you will find I have. I have quotes from James Madison and other luminaries form the 17 and 18 hundreds stating flat out you are wrong. In addition, if you do a google search, you will find there is no mention of the 2 parent rule prior to June 2008. Jerome Corsi's book "the Obama Nation" never mentioned it, despite the fact it was universally known that Obama's dad was never a citizen. If NBC=2 parents why the hell would Obama write that?
@lvgolden In fact, just for fun, here's another court case stating you are wrong about NBC...
Leake v. Gilchrist, 13 N.C. 73 (N.C. 1829)
“Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity.”
@SunlightDisinfects Dude, you are the one that justifys yourself by using Nazi propaganda, so why you would complain about getting pushed towards a Nazi model is beyond me.
Dude the rights you are endowed with do not include ignoring the law, so you have an allegiance to the USA.
And, when you quote from the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, a book used by the NAZIs as propaganda for justifying kicking off WORLD WAR II and the killing of 6 million people, there is something seriously wrong with you. Especially if you expect someone to take anything you say more seriously than I would take a speech by Adolf Hitler.
So should I contact my representative and tell him to call Laurence Rappaport? Or, what can i do to get this thing investigated in my area? There was probably voter fraud where i live too! If anyone knows then please let me know!
@projectpataaa1 Tell them that they should contact L Rappaport and bring questions to Obama's eligibility in accordance with the article II sec 1 of the Constitution as both of his parents were not citizens of the United States as defied by the Supreme court in the Minor Vs. Hapersatt case from 1875. this definition has been upheld by the supreme court on at least 2 other occasions.
I hope everyone starts realizing what really going on...obama is playing ball with most of congress and the federal reserve. He will be scared of Congressman Paul only...mitt romney is being cheated in buy voter fraud which will either bow to obama or beat obama to finish all of the horrible things obama started...Bush romney obama...same thing
“Allegiance is nothing more than the tie or duty of obedience of a subject to the sovereign under whose protection he is... Nothing is better settled at the common law than the doctrine that the children even of aliens born in a country while the parents are resident there under the protection of the government and owing a temporary allegiance thereto are subjects by birth.”
@SunlightDisinfects “It is an established maxim that birth is a criterion of allegiance. Birth however derives its force sometimes from place and sometimes from parentage, but in general place is the most certain criterion; it is what applies in the United States; it will therefore be unnecessary to investigate any other.” James Madison, the father of the US constitution.
@SunlightDisinfects Nowhere in US law dues dual citizenship invalidate one from the presidency. Spiro Agnew was a Greek citizen by Greek law due to the fact that his father was a natural born Greek citizen, and there was no mention of that fact preventing him from being Nixons Vice President, despite the fact that the VP has the same eligibility requirements as the president.
And that bit about his mother being too young would only apply if Obama was born abroad. He wasn't
@jjoshaugh Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
@Naterz100 And I don't disagree with that part of the constitution. President Obama and Joe Biden fulfill all aspects of article II.
Now I agree that there is a place for debating whether or not Birthright citizenship should be removed from law. England did it in 1984, Ireland in 2004, Australia in 2002 I think. However, sitting there pretending that it never was there in the first place just because you don't like the guy in the oval office has pushed that debate back 10 years.
At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.” this definition has been upheld on at least 2 other occasions
@Naterz100 *sigh* Try posting the rest of the paragraph...
"These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts."
@Naterz100 What this means is that Minor never ruled on children born of Alien parents. As Virginia Minor was born of two parents, they didn't need to. They simply stated that others have the definition of birthright citizenship and left it to another court to decide that.. US Vs Wong Kim Ark did so 4 years later, and ruled that parentage had no bearing on citizenship.
As you said to me, do your research, which in this case includes reading more than a quarter of the paragraph
@jjoshaugh I have and if you want can cite more cases upholding this. In reality Minor Vs. Happersatt was over property and a woman right to vote. The case was brought before the court in error. that error lost Minor the case. However the ruling has been upheld and is in other documentation as to avoid a conflict of nationalities in the office of President of the United States. You know Youtube does not allow much space for comments this does not reflect on research
@jjoshaugh Happersatt went on to state there are different levels of citizenship Natural Born, Naturalized. the Constitution states Natural Born for President.
@Naterz100 Yes, there are 2 degrees of citizenship. President Obama is a Natural Born Citizen and never had to be naturalised. You can wander over to Cornell and get that straight. from the horses mouth
As for conflict of nationalities, there is no case that says dual citizenship invalidates you from the presidency. None. Spiro Agnew was the son of a natural born greek citizen and a greek citizen by birth according to Greek law, didn't stop him being Nixons VP.
@Naterz100 As for case law, Perkins vs Elg, 1902, ruled that attaining and having dual citizenship did not invalidate your NBC status. In addition it quoted Steinkauler's case;
"Young Steinkauler is a native-born American citizen. There is no law of the United States under which his father or any other person can deprive him of his birthright. He can return to America at the age of twenty-one, and in due time, if the people elect, he can become President of the United States;"
@Naterz100 With respect to President Obama, Ankeny vs Daniels ruled specifically on HIS right to be on the Indiana ballot AND referred to minor. Their ruling?
"Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."
@jjoshaugh Under the Madison administration There was a case that persons born in the U.S. to alien parents were not U.S. citizens. This was the ruling concerning James McClure, despite the fact that his parents had been settled in the country for many years prior to his birth. The article makes clear that the United States Minister to France, General Armstrong, refused diplomatic protection for McClure by denying he was a citizen of the United States.
@Naterz100 the rueling went on to state that the parents not just a parent must be a citizen. that a, "Son of the Soil" does not establish citizenship
@Naterz100 Dude, you have it backwards. First James McClures father was naturalized, Second you are referring to a newspaper article which bloggers claim was written by Madison because he used the pseudonym Plubious when he wrote the federalist papers. That was 20 years beforehand, there was no reason for Madison to write to a paper anonymously when he was president,especially to contradict everything he ever wrote. Third, it wasn't a court case it was a letter written to a newspaper.
@Naterz100 Ok I watched Dean Haskins 10 minute waffle, Now I have a challenge to you. Go to thefogbow website and ask your questions there. Genuine questions are answered there and you will have some real experts talking to you. They will show you things about the law no birther will ever tell you. Dean Haskins doesn't even have a law degree. MammaE, who used to be the host of a birther radio show, posts there now for example. And you might find it a fun place to hang out. I did.
@jjoshaugh You have me confused I never did care for where he was born. I do not think he should be President so birther really does not apply. I think pandering unqualified socialist is a problem. If we can add ineligible which is now an active case great. I guess now we wait to see what happens. While we are at it lets check his aliases and multiple Social security numbers. there is just too much wrong with him to post here but don't feel bad I think that about most in office
@Naterz100 Dude, you pointed me to a video by a guy who runs an organization called "the Birther Summit" and who sells tee shirts with messages like "Birther by intelligence" so just skip the well worn "Oh I'm not a Birther I just..." routine. Next, what Aliases. All you have is an entrance form where Obama was admitted to a CATHOLIC school where his stepdad put his own name on it, probably because he was sick of questions about it. And as for the Social security BS...
@Naterz100 There was another president who did the same social security fraud. Ha was born in Texas, lived in Pennsylvania, and had a California Social security number. His name was Dwight D Eisenhower. Oh yeah, and he only got a birth cert when he ran for President when he was in his 60s..
Would you like to accuse IKE of not being a real American too? Sheesh
@jjoshaugh Had to split my reply in 2 here is part 1
in 1875, the United States Supreme Court, in Minor v, Happersett, ruled that:
“Natural Born Citizen” was defined as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. ...(see next)
@SunlightDisinfects James Madison, The Founders’ Constitution Volume 2(1789)
“It is an established maxim, received by all political writers, that every person owes a natural allegiance to the government of that country in which he is born. Allegiance is defined to be a tie, that binds the subject to the state,… The children of aliens, born in this state, are considered as natural born subjects, and have the same rights with the rest of the citizens.”
I love you, people of NH. Live free or die. I absolutely love you, you are the Americans I am proud of despite your rugged looks. You carry the spirit I emmigrated here for. This Constitution served as a model to T.G.Masaryk, the first President of Czech Republic after the WWI and according to my parents and grandparents THAT was the best time they ever remembered: between the wars, they called it First Republic. WE don't need no CAIR appeasing liar, who is too sexy for his pants WE NEED YOU.
@justinjamesful Excellent description of Obama voters! In fact we just saw the movie Cowboys vs Aliens and in one scene all the people captured by aliens were staring up at at the same light with a glazed look in their eyes. Both me and my husband exclaimed - Obama voters!
@justinjamesful ... LOL, per usual, anyone disagreeing with your hero is a bigot. Would be laughable if it wasnt so pathetic. Here is a news flash: HE WAS ELECTED BECAUSE HE WAS BLACK... HE IS GOING TO BE OUTSTED BECAUSE HE IS NOT ONLY INCOMPETENT BUT HE WASNT ELIGIBLE TO START WITH!!
It seems that the New Hampshire AG and the Election Commission are guilty of malfeasance and possibly misprison of felony. It's about time the cards start to fall...
@cinnamonturkey1 I don't recall insulting anyone like a "troll". All I did was quote from settles law and the constitution to refute the arguments presented in this video. If thats being an attack dog, maybe you just cant handle anything other than a soundbite with no backup.
If you disagree with my points please make an argument ahainst them. How is providing a fuller quote of Minor VS Happersett, referenced in the video, weong, for eample? if my quote is misleading, how so?
@cinnamonturkey1 Oh, Dr Orly Taitz, who they state is their Lawyer, said last week after reading it, that Minor Vs Happersett did not define NBC as born on soil of 2 citizens. Would you care to call her an Obot troll too?
Barack Hussein Obama II, illegal President, was born August 4, 1961 at the Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya and NOT in Hawaii as he claims. A high resolution copy of OBAMA’S KENYAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE is available for free download at WasObamaBornInKenya (DOTcom) … Lucas Daniel Smith obtained a certified copy of Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate from the birth hospital in February 2009. His amazing story is told in a VIDEO that is also available for viewing at the same website.
@bsteadman1 Lucas smith is a convicted forger and his "amazing story" includes accounts of Pedophillia. I believe he also claims he conned a sick man out of money for a Kidney transplant. He also has refused point blank to provide any proof he ever went to Kenya, Kenyan officials have said the BC he tried to sell on Ebay is a fake, its nothing like any Kenyan BC, and it has a name of a hospital administrator that didn't take office till 4 months after he claims he got the BC.
@bsteadman1 It does not matter his place of birth. He could have been born on the steps to the Capitol in Washington D.C. He cannot hold the office because there is NO WAY he can be a Natural Born Citizen as his father is a citizen of Kenya. This removes the need for a birth certificate or place of birth. Best yet Obama admits his father is a citizen of Kenya. he can't back out (at least legally)
@Naterz100 -- You are, of course, correct on this, at least according to legal logic.... However, I do NOT have confidence that our POSSIBLY-COMPROMISED Supreme Court would interpret Minor v Happersett correctly! I believe it would be best to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES FIRST against BHO-II, before SCOTUS can set some STUPID PRECEDENT. The BC-fraud and the SSN-fraud issues can be handled at the State or County level by ordinary law enforcement and don't need to involve SCOTUS. Just my opinion!
I love the fact that "regular people" who are elected are pursuing the truth like this. These people are not "slick lawyers" but relatively "normal folk." :-)
Hey Obama, please move out of the White house so President Ron Paul can measure for new curtains. Thank you.
pokerfacetodd 1 month ago
Comment removed
pokerfacetodd 1 month ago
hey, there is no such thing as "ethnecicity.." get some educated fellas on board, you might also check out Rosetti's criminal record.
I have been fighting against the illegal usurper for a long time & be damned if we should lose everything because of incompetence..
These old doddering fools don't know what they're doing & include a felon in their midst, WTF??
ProVeterans2010 1 month ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ProVeterans2010 My, it is sad that your channel cannot be found to back up these allegations, and it is me that you are talking about. Send me your address so that I may press charges on you for slandering my name.
And oh yes, I'm a bad boy, I have two felonies for driving offenses, and the records are public, but you are by far in the wrong.
Do you dare to tell me who you are, as you are speaking to the horses mouth...
Show some guts...and come out from hiding, yellowbelly!
MaxCandor 1 month ago
@MaxCandor If you have a criminal record, you can press charges all you want, beard guy. He has every right to expose you to people who need to know this stuff.
RemoveIllegals12 1 month ago 3
@MaxCandor Hey bud, we did some checking, since you made a big deal of your 'innocence' we know that you have considerably more than two driving felonies.
RemoveIllegals12 4 weeks ago 2
@MaxCandor you are one heck of an idiot!!!!!!
SupportDonaldTrump 3 weeks ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ProVeterans2010 Moreover, does being a felon, and one of a non-violent crime, driving offenses, make it so that I cannot stand for my state, country or Constitution?
I shared my record," by the way" with the NH reps... and they knew "who" they were dealing with.
Go ahead CCAllen, you are co-intel. It seems that whenever I am hovering over the target, you show up.
Surely you care not about the USA, so join all of the other haters, and go.
I am not moved by you... co-intel...
MaxCandor 1 month ago
Comment removed
RemoveIllegals12 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RemoveIllegals12 Ah, now you are showing your colors. Sad that you are worried about whom I accuse, though I was the one slandered with false allegations.
Been stalked b4 you know, and the first bit of info that I can use to press charges, I will use. The last times I was too nice and dropped them, but this time I won't stop, or forget; and I will press charges, with the confirmed assistance of many NH Reps.
I have all the info I need from b4, so go ahead, and try me...
MaxCandor 1 month ago
@MaxCandor so, you're a felon and you want to press charges because someone said you're a fellon? it's not against the law, as a matter of fact, the guy HAD an obligation to make others aware what he knows Do you live on this planet?
This is an important issue, yet -- you don't post the video on your channel; no need for the old crowd to see, huh?
TheLyingTube2009 1 month ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheLyingTube2009 Let me be blunt, code law and Constitutional law are very different. Code law deems that one requires permission from the govt to travel, I've disagreed and traveled. So they locked me up, does that mean I'm wrong?
Show me where in the Constitution it says that "The people's travel shall be regulated." It doesn't...
If you feel that permission must be attained from the govt to do as you wish, while not harming another, you are 1 programmed and lead sheep.
MaxCandor 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ProVeterans2010 And one last thing that I need to ask you... CO-INTEL TROLL, how many other youtube names can you throw at me this time? (Remember usa 180?)
YT Folks, (Especially from NH) watch the drama, and save the comments and videos... and I will expose this idiot.
Please let me know who you are, troll, so that I can sue you...Co-intel...
Your lies have no weight with NH folks, they know me...and you don't.....
MaxCandor 1 month ago
@MaxCandor If you have a criminal record it might not be all that good of an idea to slam the guy. And IF you lied 'bout your record only being "non-violent" driving offenses, they will find out.
We don't need to hand this to the Obama crowd.
RemoveIllegals12 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RemoveIllegals12 Do you mean that "you wished that you had something to hand, to the Obummer crowd?"
My record is as I stated, I've got nothing to hide; and the Reps have known me for many years, and like me they know that this is all someones B.S. and drivel.
I am moved only to laughter... is this all they have got? Sad...
MaxCandor 1 month ago
@MaxCandor sounds to me they know obama is a criminal, no need to show off another criminal. You sure are one heck of a dunce, moron.
TheLyingTube2009 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheLyingTube2009 BO has violated the Constitution with regularity, and I have violated code laws, which is very different.
I have broken an illegal law, Constitutionally speaking. It is the duty of every person who wishes to retain his/her freedom and rights to "Non-violently" violate unlawful laws.
Please refute this... and show me your true colors.
Assassinating my character will not divide or stop the course of this mission, but it tells us loudly, which side you are on..
MaxCandor 1 month ago
@MaxCandor Felon, move on!!!!!!
IdiotJudges 1 month ago 4
@MaxCandor You are a felon and should do the right thing, get out!
RemoveIllegals12 4 weeks ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@ProVeterans2010 Do you take those peeps who read this to be fools? As you state, "I have been fighting against the illegal usurper for a long time." Funny the way that you fight, by character assassination and division of people with the same objectives. Just whose side are you on?
In NH, when one is arrested, charged in court or incarcerated, it is publicized; and records are easily found. My conscience is clear.
Constitutionally, peeps are pro or con, which do you work for?
MaxCandor 1 month ago
@MaxCandor Hey asshat, we do NOT NEED felons to fight Obama, GET IT? STHU
IdiotJudges 1 month ago 5
The motivations of these people are purely racially motivated! You can attempt to dress it up as a constitutional concern, but in the end the true sinister motivations are clear. If it was a White president of European descent, there would be no questions raised about eligibility. What a sad bunch of useless folks!
TheBiotchify 1 month ago
@TheBiotchify That's bull. This is not racially motivated whatsoever. This is American-motivated. This is Constitutionally motivated. Regardless of what you may -think- people's motivations are, HOW MUCH MORE FRIGHTENING IS IT THAT THE GOVT IS WILLING TO COVER IT UP???????? These men are worried about bigger issues than race: IE CORRUPTION.
PrivationProductions 1 month ago
@PrivationProductions Where were you and the other "Constitutionalist" when G.W. Bush stole the election in Florida? When black voters were turned away at the polls and purged thousands of mainly minority votes, I heard nothing from you folks! The screening process for the presidency of the US is the most intense of any in the world! This is about a black man with a Muslim name to boot that became president and some just can't handle that!
TheBiotchify 1 month ago
@TheBiotchify I didn't like Bush, but at least he met the eligibility requirements. How hard is it to understand it doesn't matter what the motivations are on this issue, it's about whether the law is being broken. How can you be hypocritical and accuse Bush of violating our rights when Obama is doing the same thing? I voted Obama, and I'm smart enough to regret it.
PrivationProductions 1 month ago
@PrivationProductions I believe that your motivations are sincere, however I do not feel the same about other who make that argument. I also voted for Obama and also regret it. I was not defending him per say, but rather challenging what the motivations of "birther" movement. I wish that Ron Paul could get the nomination, but the deck seems to stacked against him! If he does not get the nomination, I will not vote!
TheBiotchify 1 month ago
@TheBiotchify It is unfortunate, but we must use the same tactic that Ron Paul seems to be using, which is: play the conspirator's game against them. "Racists" (i.e. White Nationalists) have been on the "correct side" of conspiracy theory for a long time. It is unfortunate, but we cannot deny the good things they say because they have said bad things before. They are not entirely incorrect when they see a conspiracy against their race, it just so happens their racism helped them see it first.
PrivationProductions 1 month ago
@TheBiotchify but have discernment with what i said. I am not accusing every birther or anti-NWO'r of racism. I think they are rightly concerned over matters of their nation, their rights, their properties, and yes, their race. However, I think racial concerns are not the primary motivator. Sheer logic dictates there is something fishy when the supreme court backs an unconstitutional ruling, and when they call the document obsolete, which one judge did recently.
PrivationProductions 1 month ago
To be President of the USA, Obama must be a "natural born citizen" according to the Constitution of the USA and it requires 2 conditions:
1) Obama must be born in the USA.
2) Obama's parents MUST BOTH be American citizens.
Obama's father was NEVER an American citizen!
Therefore OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT OF THE USA!
Check "The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth" at puzo1.blogspot.com
michaelhtvr 1 month ago
Skip to Time Mark: 5:14 - According to the federal Constitution "No one but a Natural Born Citizen may be President of the United States"; while the Supreme Court & a Senate Resolution declared that, "a Natural Born Citizen" is one in which either *BOTH* parents were born in one of the several states or who are citizens of the United States".
For the love of our federal constitutional republic, uphold your state & federal constitution. Stop Election Fraud! Obama is ineligible to hold office!
assistme 1 month ago
Kindly notice that the lawyer representing this case is Dr Orly Taitz; who holds herself out as Dr Orly Taitz, ESQUIRE. So, what's an "Esquire"? In the United States, the suffix Esq. most commonly designates individuals licensed to practice law, and may be used by both men and women. So, who can practice law? In most states, only those who have passed "The Bar" may practice law. So, what's "The Bar Association"? Read this: healthfreedom. info/BAR%20Association. htm
assistme 1 month ago
I am so glad I renounced my US citizenship & burned my US passport. NDAA is law. FEMA camps are open and Americans are doomed. Get out while you can. There is NO US Constitution at this point.
JORDANSAGESVLOG 1 month ago
@JORDANSAGESVLOG i know, this really sucks.
PrivationProductions 1 month ago
Voting machines are hacked; Vote by absentee ballot to make sure there is a paper trail of your vote that can be RECOUNTED and ensure your vote is not STOLEN by some computer program! Then if there is any discrepancy, we can compare what they say Ron Paul received and what he really received!
ocsob007 1 month ago
Thank you for your efforts. It's been ignored long enough.
jshe28 2 months ago
We all know that Obama is ineligible. That said he must not be allowed on the ballot for the office of the Presidency in any State or Possession of the United States. Every bill , every executive order , every rule or judgement by the administration or any agency thereof is therefore null and void. Criminal charges must follow. We also know that Obama never legally changed his name from Soetoro. There fore when he took the oath of office , he committed a fraud.
letsgofly10 2 months ago
For those viewers of this and related videos, specifically those who are having difficulty getting the underlying cause of the mysteries surrounding the routine usurpations of our original, organic constitution, we seriously implore you to go to the internet on Google to search: Act of 1871 pdf so you can conduct your research in the areas no one in "government" is willing to tell you. We have nothing resembling what we had at the time of the birth of this great nation.
NHJudicialWatch 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
As usual, radical left-wing, anti-constitutional, and Liberal/Progressive operatives of GraniteStateProgress are attempting to embarrass law abiding people for upholding the Constitution. This is especially troubling since Obama is threat to our people.
NHJudicialWatch 2 months ago
These Representatives, and these people, especially Dick Marple, deserve the admiration and respect of every American who struggles to uphold the Constitutions. AG Delaney is a disgrace. He is a great example for why we need the stranglehold of the BAR Association out of our government.
NHJudicialWatch 2 months ago 3
@NHJudicialWatch Check out Rosetti!
IdiotJudges 1 month ago 3
@SunlightDisinfects Well and good, but what if your rulers are all-powerful don't respect the law, then what? Freedom is backed not by fine words, but by action. And don't get me wrong, they're all fine words. Just don't confuse them with "inalienable rights".
TheEnneagram 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects
James Madison, who WROTE the Constitution, said that the children of aliens who are born in the United States are still natural-born citizens of the United States.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects
No, it was not. Vattel's "Law of Nations" is not a legal document in the United States. It's simply a book. It is not and never was part of the Constitution, and to claim it is marks you as insane.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects So what, who cares what Vattel wrote. It will take more than words to force change.
BEGINNING OF STORY
TheEnneagram 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects I wouldn't go so far as to say NO MATTER WHAT.
That's the voice of entitlement singing the song of defeat and death.
The Declaration of Independence is the Law of this land only if the people themselves break the chain of obediance and assert our rights before we lose them altogether.
No document can do for the people what they must do for themselves, in any generation, anywhere.
I share your sentiment, though not your confidence in words.
TheEnneagram 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects RED SHIELDS and their agents ...
TheEnneagram 2 months ago
If only the Texas State Legislature would do what NH and other states are doing. Great job, and Good luck! :)
MyFreedomChannel 2 months ago
@MyFreedomChannel You need to spread this video to everyone you know and get everyone to call your reps and get them to serve papers to the attorney general requesting an immediate investigation. I have a feeling here in Louisiana we are already onboard with this because i see senator vitter dislikes obama a lot and im sure he will be glad to get involved.
absoluteanatomy1 2 months ago
@absoluteanatomy1 The last I knew, our state AG was looking into this, but it's going to be difficult to get our Lt. Governor David Dewhurst on board; he killed the anti-TSA bill in our Senate with backroom intimidation. From what I've been told by people in my area, we're going to have an uphill battle b/c of that. But I will do my best. Thanks! :)
MyFreedomChannel 2 months ago
@MyFreedomChannel Yeah i heard about that, that was very unconstitutional of him. If Rick Perry really wanted to prove himself to the people further he should fire Senator Dewhurst, he would probably earn support away from rick santorum and mitt romney right away, but don't worry about Dewhurst, just spread this video to everyone you know and tell them to spread it because it is very important and the more people that raise hell about it the more of a priority it will be for them to address it!
absoluteanatomy1 2 months ago
Article one, section 8, clause 10...remember that....
DMChoreographer 2 months ago
I'm not Rappaport!
GridJumping 2 months ago
Shameful. What has happened to the integrity of men and women? It is time for good Americans to bring this to a stop!
klassylady25 2 months ago
Also, "The Law of Nations" has never held any legal status in the United States.
RedXlV 2 months ago
There is not and has never been any law suggesting that both parents have to be citizens for a person to be a natural-born citizen. Everyone born in the United States is a natural-born citizen, and anybody who claims otherwise belongs in an insane asylum.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@RedXlV Actually, the SCOTUS found in two different cases that being a natural born citizen is defined as having two parents of US citizenship. Check the facts!
CaraGia13 2 months ago
@CaraGia13
No, the Supreme Court has never found any such thing. There has never been a case before the Supreme Court about the definition of a natural-born citizen. The reason for that is simple: the ONLY place anywhere in US law where it makes any difference whether a citizen is "natural-born" is the qualifications for the presidency. Since the Supreme Court has never heard a case challenging anybody's eligibility to be President, they've never ruled on the issue.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@RedXlV - On the contrary, you may want to do a bit more research on that issue before you misspeak again. Although the office of POTUS is the only government office that requires the holder to be a "natural born citizen" government held positions are not the only areas in this country where "natural born citizenship" is a concern. With that in mind, the US Supreme Court has in fact heard no less than four cases where it has defined the term "natural born citizen".
OKKix 2 months ago
@OKKix
No, there are four cases where Birthers CLAIM the Supreme Court has defined "natural-born citizen". It did not, in fact, do so in any of those cases.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@RedXlV The Supreme court first set Prescience on this in 1875 in the Minor Vs. Hapersett. There is not a lower court (that legally can overturn this) The courts were in error not hearing the case. this is being corrected as the case is moving forward.
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100
Minor v Hapersett does not, in fact, say anything about natural-born citizenship or presidential eligibility. The issue before the court in that case was whether it was constitutional to deny some citizens the right to vote. The Supreme Court ruled that it was in fact constitutional to do so. Since courts are not ALLOWED to rule on anything other than the actual case they're hearing at the time, not only did Minor v Hapersett not define "natural-born citizen", it COULDN'T.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@RedXlV Again you missed what I said there is a court willing to hear the case this is happening for the first time since people have brought up the issue, and Minor vs. Happersett is at the center of this case. Google this article (I am sure you will find more with ease)
Court to hear Obama eligibility challenge on merits, first time
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100
So where is the court that's willing to hear it? You claiming there is one doesn't make it so.
And Minor v. Hapersett didn't say that a natural-born citizen has to have two parents who are citizens. It said that anybody born in the US with two citizens as parents is a US citizen, but said nothing about that being the DEFINITION of natural-born.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@RedXlV Georiga and Minor vs Happerstt said A child born of TWO citizens is a citizen of the country of their parents regardless of the place of birth.
Naterz100 2 months ago
@RedXlV Thought I told you this and even told you what to Google for the info. However, Georgia is willing to hear it. Google--- Georgia to hear case of Obama's eligibility. you will find plenty of results
Naterz100 2 months ago
@RedXlV What do you think "citizen(S) as parent(S)" means? Apparently, you don't comprehend that when you put an "s" at the end of such words as "citizen(s) & parent(s) that it means TWO (2) in this instance. That IS the definition of natural-born citizen!!! DUHHH
MyFreedomChannel 2 months ago
@MyFreedomChannel
No, it's NOT the definition of a natural-born citizen. Repeating the lie doesn't make it so.
RedXlV 2 months ago
What’s the penalty for High Treason? (DEATH)
That’s a freebie. Now, for the tricky questions:
If he’s found guilty of fraud, and legally ineligible, then what about his illegally appointed cabinet? (CONSTITUTIONALLY, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MUST BE “REBOOTED” WITH A NEW ADMINISTRATION)
Aren’t they ineligible to succeed him without a general election? (YES, THAT MAKES BIDEN AND CLINTON, ET AL, ILLEGAL OFFICE HOLDERS, TOO)
Aren’t all the laws he signed into effect also disqualified? (YES)
TheEnneagram 2 months ago 6
@TheEnneagram
It's amazing how wrong you are about everything.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@RedXlV so please do tell how much has improved in the last 3 years?
Naterz100 2 months ago
@RedXlV Folks who proclaim their amazement publicly demonstrate their own naivete and credulity.
Me, I am almost never surprised or amazed, and least of all by anything anyone says or writes.
I see two possibilities for you:
Crawl back under whatever rock call your own and hope no else asks questions near you, or grow up and face the possibility the something important eludes you.
Happy 2012.
TheEnneagram 2 months ago
@TheEnneagram
Or maybe you should just accept that you have not discovered something important (or even something real), and are instead simply delusional.
The reality is that Obama has been proven beyond any doubt to be eligible, and your wishful thinking won't change that.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@RedXlV "Beyond any doubt"? That's cute. And yet doubt continues to swirl ... I'll bet you're one of those climate change deniers ... Cheers.
TheEnneagram 2 months ago
@TheEnneagram
No, lies continue to swirl.
And people on your side are more likely to deny global warming. After all, Birtherism, like global warming denial, requires you to ignore the facts.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@TheEnneagram yup it is time to reboot before things are worse
Naterz100 2 months ago
so he pulled the curtain over the peoples eyes the first time he ran for this office. That's no surprise, many of us seen this.
Trypermovie 2 months ago
Last word from Supreme Court: 1875, Minor v Happersett: "Natural Born Citizen” was defined as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law ... it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.” Obama's dad not U.S. citizen.
lvgolden 2 months ago
@lvgolden Last word from the supreme court apart from the rest of the paragraph, Wong Kim Ark and the rejection of the appeals of 15 birther lawsuits....
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@lvgolden
That ruling does not, in fact, define "natural-born citizens". Try reading again what you posted. It doesn't say what you think it says.
RedXlV 2 months ago
Lets look at what Vattel actually wrote, shall we?
212. Les Citoyens sont les membres de la Société Civile: Liés à cette Société par certains devoirs, & sourmis à son Autorité, il participent avec égalité à ses avantages. Les Naturels, ou Indigènes sont ceux qui sont nés dans le pays, de Parens Citoyens. La Société ne pouvant se soutenir & se perpétuer que par les enfans des Citoyens; ces enfans y suivent naturellement la conditionn de leurs Pères, & entrent dans tous leurs droits.
So there.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects Vattel used the term PARENS not PARENTS. Parens means BLOOD RELATIVES not parents in french, you shmuck. Also the line where law of Nations is metioned in the constitution "Of Offenses against the Law of Nations" was the title of Blackstone treatise, Book 4, Chapter 5, dealing with Piracy. Guess what that line in the constitution deals with? Piracy.
Guess what Blackstone thought of citizenship? Birth on soil regardless of parents.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@jjoshaugh
What Vattel wrote is irrelevant. Vattel's writings have no standing in United States law.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@RedXlV Agreed. I was just posting the original french to so show how ridiculous these people saying "Oh Vattel said this" etc. Vattel is a fairly important figure in the development of mainland European law, but He flat out stated that his rules don't apply in English law, which is the basis of American Common law.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@jjoshaugh
Glad to see at least a few people here are rational enough to understand that.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects Thank You Sunligh. I have to get on with my lifs and must pull away from Youtube. this is the case and it was set forth for a solid and sound reason. Our founding Fathers wanted the Republic to be sound and protect the freedom of the people and they saw a person's citizenship and the Presidency as a possible threat to the freedom of the people.
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100 sorry about the typos I am in a hurry as I am running late
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100 "That provision in the constitution which requires that the president shall be a native-born citizen (unless he were a citizen of the United States when the constitution was adopted,) is a happy means of security against foreign influence, which, where-ever it is capable of being exerted, is to be dreaded more than the plague." St. George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries 1:App. 316--25, 328--29
year 1803
They were concerned, which is why they used birthright citizenship.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@jjoshaugh here is the truth before I get back. I did not support Obama and his ideas in 08. I do not support him now. it has nothing to do with birth and has every thing to do with his Ideas his friends his influences and his desire to destroy something that did and has worked. After he took office I have opposed almost everything he has done because it is the wrong direction for the country top that with even more associations such as ACORN and the Black Panthers. see part 2
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100 therefor I am behind this or any other move to remove him. As I said don't feel bad I think we need to remove more than Obama and his appointees. Anyone who supported the NDAA needs to go John Bohnner needs to go anyone offering support for the SOPA needs to go. I don't care how as long as they face charges for their crimes. Obama is only one step in the process of restoring the Republic our founder's willed to us.
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100 Just because you don't support someone's ideas does not mean you turn around and pretend the law is something its not so that you can pretend he is not really the President. That's the action of a child. I don't give a rats ass what you think of his beliefs, the guy is entitled to sit in the oval office and there's 200 years of law backing that up. If you don't like him, volunteer for and donate to his opposition and VOTE.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@jjoshaugh I do not believe he is legal. There is a court willing to listen to this case at hand. As to voting it is our last recourse of peaceful action to restore our republic I will continue to vote. Yet feel there is no viable candidate to restore the republic. The truth is with the NDAA we can look into a number of our non representing representatives and Impeach Convict and in some cases hang or imprison for life the traitors to this country. Obama is one of them.
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100
You "do not believe he is legal", you say? That makes you a MORON. Obama is the President of the United States, no matter how much you wish he wasn't.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@RedXlV Well there is a court willing to listen to this case. So there must be enough evidence to at least question him. This is the responsibility of every American Citizen We need to question our leaders it is part of what makes the republic work. Legal or not he has been a disaster to the country, passing missile defense plans to the Russians wanting to negotiate with the Taliban and lets not forget that pesky debt. If you look at my other comments they all need to go not just Obama
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100
You can believe he's a "disaster" all you want. You're entitled to your own opinion. You are not, however, entitled to your own facts. Obama is the legal, legitimately elected President of the United States. Your disapproval does not change that fact. And if there's a court willing to listen to this case, where is it? Every court that's had a Birther lawsuit brought before it has dismissed them as baseless, frivolous, and a complete waste of the court's time.
RedXlV 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
here is one more how about remove him for treason . Google The Washington Times and read "Inside the Ring". I do believe that Treason is a reason to Impeach and possibly imprison Obama. In any regard it makes him ineligible to hold the office making him not capable of holding the seat. This is not about law it is about political will to uphold the law. this is why we need to toss almost all of them out and start over.
Naterz100 2 months ago
Comment removed
Naterz100 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects That explains why Vattel was the 26th most cited legal scholar in the Congrelional debates, after Machiavelli. And not one of those places he was cited dealt with citizenship Lord Blackstone was the 4th most cited source, and Blackstone believed in Birthright citizenship and was cited on citizenhip.
Are you just going to CTRL+V shit or are you going to actually argue a case. Not that there is one.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Help us to block a bill called Stop Online Piracy Act. SOPA is a bill that would create America's
first Internet censorship system. In a nutshell, it is similar like the censorship in China,
Iran, etc.#OpBlackout will not be silenced. We, #Anonymous, shall prevail!
h t t p s : / / w w w .youtube.com /watch?v =S1PeuX-gXp4
Pagechan1 2 months ago
It is clear that Obama does not qualify to be on the ballot for the presidency of the United States. He is not a natural born citizen, since his father was never a U.S. citizen. It's ironic that McCain's qualification to run for the presidency was questioned and even went to a hearing. Why was Obama allowed to be on the ballot in 2008? Why no hearing on his qualification?
lvgolden 2 months ago
@lvgolden Because President Obama was born on US soil and Senator John McCain wasn't. End of reason.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@jjoshaugh A natural born citizen refers to one who is born in the U.S. (or a U.S. territory) and whose parents (both) are citizens of the U.S. Obama's father was never a citizen of the U.S. End of case. Obama should not have been on the ballot in 2008. Do some research.
lvgolden 2 months ago
@lvgolden If you had read the comments you will find I have. I have quotes from James Madison and other luminaries form the 17 and 18 hundreds stating flat out you are wrong. In addition, if you do a google search, you will find there is no mention of the 2 parent rule prior to June 2008. Jerome Corsi's book "the Obama Nation" never mentioned it, despite the fact it was universally known that Obama's dad was never a citizen. If NBC=2 parents why the hell would Obama write that?
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@lvgolden In fact, just for fun, here's another court case stating you are wrong about NBC...
Leake v. Gilchrist, 13 N.C. 73 (N.C. 1829)
“Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity.”
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@lvgolden
No, it does not. Repeating that lie won't make it transform into the truth.
RedXlV 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects Dude, you are the one that justifys yourself by using Nazi propaganda, so why you would complain about getting pushed towards a Nazi model is beyond me.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects
Dude the rights you are endowed with do not include ignoring the law, so you have an allegiance to the USA.
And, when you quote from the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, a book used by the NAZIs as propaganda for justifying kicking off WORLD WAR II and the killing of 6 million people, there is something seriously wrong with you. Especially if you expect someone to take anything you say more seriously than I would take a speech by Adolf Hitler.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
Outstanding!!!!
WendyTai1 2 months ago
These delightful idiots are going to help re-elect the POTUS! Ain't it great?
Plutodog419 2 months ago
So should I contact my representative and tell him to call Laurence Rappaport? Or, what can i do to get this thing investigated in my area? There was probably voter fraud where i live too! If anyone knows then please let me know!
projectpataaa1 2 months ago
@projectpataaa1 Yes contact your states AG and your representatives.
Naterz100 2 months ago 6
@Naterz100 ok i am, what should i tell them? to get intouch with lawrence rappaport?
projectpataaa1 2 months ago
@projectpataaa1 Tell them that they should contact L Rappaport and bring questions to Obama's eligibility in accordance with the article II sec 1 of the Constitution as both of his parents were not citizens of the United States as defied by the Supreme court in the Minor Vs. Hapersatt case from 1875. this definition has been upheld by the supreme court on at least 2 other occasions.
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100 ok, i'm emailing them now i appreciate it
projectpataaa1 2 months ago
I hope everyone starts realizing what really going on...obama is playing ball with most of congress and the federal reserve. He will be scared of Congressman Paul only...mitt romney is being cheated in buy voter fraud which will either bow to obama or beat obama to finish all of the horrible things obama started...Bush romney obama...same thing
absoluteanatomy1 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE’S COMMENTARIES (1803)
“Allegiance is nothing more than the tie or duty of obedience of a subject to the sovereign under whose protection he is... Nothing is better settled at the common law than the doctrine that the children even of aliens born in a country while the parents are resident there under the protection of the government and owing a temporary allegiance thereto are subjects by birth.”
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects “It is an established maxim that birth is a criterion of allegiance. Birth however derives its force sometimes from place and sometimes from parentage, but in general place is the most certain criterion; it is what applies in the United States; it will therefore be unnecessary to investigate any other.” James Madison, the father of the US constitution.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects Nowhere in US law dues dual citizenship invalidate one from the presidency. Spiro Agnew was a Greek citizen by Greek law due to the fact that his father was a natural born Greek citizen, and there was no mention of that fact preventing him from being Nixons Vice President, despite the fact that the VP has the same eligibility requirements as the president.
And that bit about his mother being too young would only apply if Obama was born abroad. He wasn't
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@jjoshaugh Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100 And I don't disagree with that part of the constitution. President Obama and Joe Biden fulfill all aspects of article II.
Now I agree that there is a place for debating whether or not Birthright citizenship should be removed from law. England did it in 1984, Ireland in 2004, Australia in 2002 I think. However, sitting there pretending that it never was there in the first place just because you don't like the guy in the oval office has pushed that debate back 10 years.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
My reply must be two parts here is part two:
At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.” this definition has been upheld on at least 2 other occasions
Naterz100 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Naterz100 *sigh* Try posting the rest of the paragraph...
"These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts."
There it is in plain English.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@Naterz100 What this means is that Minor never ruled on children born of Alien parents. As Virginia Minor was born of two parents, they didn't need to. They simply stated that others have the definition of birthright citizenship and left it to another court to decide that.. US Vs Wong Kim Ark did so 4 years later, and ruled that parentage had no bearing on citizenship.
As you said to me, do your research, which in this case includes reading more than a quarter of the paragraph
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@jjoshaugh I have and if you want can cite more cases upholding this. In reality Minor Vs. Happersatt was over property and a woman right to vote. The case was brought before the court in error. that error lost Minor the case. However the ruling has been upheld and is in other documentation as to avoid a conflict of nationalities in the office of President of the United States. You know Youtube does not allow much space for comments this does not reflect on research
Naterz100 2 months ago
@jjoshaugh Happersatt went on to state there are different levels of citizenship Natural Born, Naturalized. the Constitution states Natural Born for President.
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100 Yes, there are 2 degrees of citizenship. President Obama is a Natural Born Citizen and never had to be naturalised. You can wander over to Cornell and get that straight. from the horses mouth
As for conflict of nationalities, there is no case that says dual citizenship invalidates you from the presidency. None. Spiro Agnew was the son of a natural born greek citizen and a greek citizen by birth according to Greek law, didn't stop him being Nixons VP.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@Naterz100 As for case law, Perkins vs Elg, 1902, ruled that attaining and having dual citizenship did not invalidate your NBC status. In addition it quoted Steinkauler's case;
"Young Steinkauler is a native-born American citizen. There is no law of the United States under which his father or any other person can deprive him of his birthright. He can return to America at the age of twenty-one, and in due time, if the people elect, he can become President of the United States;"
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@Naterz100 With respect to President Obama, Ankeny vs Daniels ruled specifically on HIS right to be on the Indiana ballot AND referred to minor. Their ruling?
"Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents."
There is no case law stating otherwise.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@jjoshaugh Under the Madison administration There was a case that persons born in the U.S. to alien parents were not U.S. citizens. This was the ruling concerning James McClure, despite the fact that his parents had been settled in the country for many years prior to his birth. The article makes clear that the United States Minister to France, General Armstrong, refused diplomatic protection for McClure by denying he was a citizen of the United States.
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100 the rueling went on to state that the parents not just a parent must be a citizen. that a, "Son of the Soil" does not establish citizenship
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100 Dude, you have it backwards. First James McClures father was naturalized, Second you are referring to a newspaper article which bloggers claim was written by Madison because he used the pseudonym Plubious when he wrote the federalist papers. That was 20 years beforehand, there was no reason for Madison to write to a paper anonymously when he was president,especially to contradict everything he ever wrote. Third, it wasn't a court case it was a letter written to a newspaper.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@jjoshaugh At work have little time please see this video on youttube it will do better than I can in the rush out the door for work.
Natural Born Citizen for Dummies
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100 Have a great day at work. Nice talking to you.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@Naterz100 Ok I watched Dean Haskins 10 minute waffle, Now I have a challenge to you. Go to thefogbow website and ask your questions there. Genuine questions are answered there and you will have some real experts talking to you. They will show you things about the law no birther will ever tell you. Dean Haskins doesn't even have a law degree. MammaE, who used to be the host of a birther radio show, posts there now for example. And you might find it a fun place to hang out. I did.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@jjoshaugh You have me confused I never did care for where he was born. I do not think he should be President so birther really does not apply. I think pandering unqualified socialist is a problem. If we can add ineligible which is now an active case great. I guess now we wait to see what happens. While we are at it lets check his aliases and multiple Social security numbers. there is just too much wrong with him to post here but don't feel bad I think that about most in office
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100 Dude, you pointed me to a video by a guy who runs an organization called "the Birther Summit" and who sells tee shirts with messages like "Birther by intelligence" so just skip the well worn "Oh I'm not a Birther I just..." routine. Next, what Aliases. All you have is an entrance form where Obama was admitted to a CATHOLIC school where his stepdad put his own name on it, probably because he was sick of questions about it. And as for the Social security BS...
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@Naterz100 There was another president who did the same social security fraud. Ha was born in Texas, lived in Pennsylvania, and had a California Social security number. His name was Dwight D Eisenhower. Oh yeah, and he only got a birth cert when he ran for President when he was in his 60s..
Would you like to accuse IKE of not being a real American too? Sheesh
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@jjoshaugh Had to split my reply in 2 here is part 1
in 1875, the United States Supreme Court, in Minor v, Happersett, ruled that:
“Natural Born Citizen” was defined as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. ...(see next)
Naterz100 2 months ago
@SunlightDisinfects James Madison, The Founders’ Constitution Volume 2(1789)
“It is an established maxim, received by all political writers, that every person owes a natural allegiance to the government of that country in which he is born. Allegiance is defined to be a tie, that binds the subject to the state,… The children of aliens, born in this state, are considered as natural born subjects, and have the same rights with the rest of the citizens.”
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
Here's to unruly state representatives! Dear Jane, About that Obama eligibility thing...
seektress dot.com nhjane.htm
seektress 2 months ago
I love you, people of NH. Live free or die. I absolutely love you, you are the Americans I am proud of despite your rugged looks. You carry the spirit I emmigrated here for. This Constitution served as a model to T.G.Masaryk, the first President of Czech Republic after the WWI and according to my parents and grandparents THAT was the best time they ever remembered: between the wars, they called it First Republic. WE don't need no CAIR appeasing liar, who is too sexy for his pants WE NEED YOU.
stanicka1962 2 months ago
You people are clowns. A laughing stock of this Country. The people who voted for these ignorant people should really be ashamed and embarrassed.
TheLillyism 2 months ago
@TheLillyism People who voted for Obama should really be ashamed and embarrassed
rhcrest 2 months ago
Coo, coo for Co co puffs!
justinjamesful 2 months ago
@justinjamesful Excellent description of Obama voters! In fact we just saw the movie Cowboys vs Aliens and in one scene all the people captured by aliens were staring up at at the same light with a glazed look in their eyes. Both me and my husband exclaimed - Obama voters!
rhcrest 2 months ago 4
President Obama is our President, so get over it you racist idiots.
justinjamesful 2 months ago
@justinjamesful ... LOL, per usual, anyone disagreeing with your hero is a bigot. Would be laughable if it wasnt so pathetic. Here is a news flash: HE WAS ELECTED BECAUSE HE WAS BLACK... HE IS GOING TO BE OUTSTED BECAUSE HE IS NOT ONLY INCOMPETENT BUT HE WASNT ELIGIBLE TO START WITH!!
angelbaby74965 2 months ago 6
@angelbaby74965 Being black didn't help Alan Keyes get elected when he ran for president. Or Herman Cain for that matter.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@justinjamesful TRUTH KNOWS NO COLOR, NEITHER DOES FRAUD!
sogholi 2 months ago
@justinjamesful Gee the racist thing has gotten so old - it's even become the punchline of jokes. Is that all you have?
rhcrest 2 months ago
RON PAUL 2012
SaturnDanceRitual 2 months ago 2
It seems that the New Hampshire AG and the Election Commission are guilty of malfeasance and possibly misprison of felony. It's about time the cards start to fall...
JakeBlakeProject 2 months ago
Reading some of the comments I see the obot attack dogs are peeing themselves in frenzy. Run along you moronic trolls!
cinnamonturkey1 2 months ago 2
@cinnamonturkey1 I don't recall insulting anyone like a "troll". All I did was quote from settles law and the constitution to refute the arguments presented in this video. If thats being an attack dog, maybe you just cant handle anything other than a soundbite with no backup.
If you disagree with my points please make an argument ahainst them. How is providing a fuller quote of Minor VS Happersett, referenced in the video, weong, for eample? if my quote is misleading, how so?
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@cinnamonturkey1 Oh, Dr Orly Taitz, who they state is their Lawyer, said last week after reading it, that Minor Vs Happersett did not define NBC as born on soil of 2 citizens. Would you care to call her an Obot troll too?
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
Barack Hussein Obama II, illegal President, was born August 4, 1961 at the Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya and NOT in Hawaii as he claims. A high resolution copy of OBAMA’S KENYAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE is available for free download at WasObamaBornInKenya (DOTcom) … Lucas Daniel Smith obtained a certified copy of Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate from the birth hospital in February 2009. His amazing story is told in a VIDEO that is also available for viewing at the same website.
bsteadman1 2 months ago
@bsteadman1 Lucas smith is a convicted forger and his "amazing story" includes accounts of Pedophillia. I believe he also claims he conned a sick man out of money for a Kidney transplant. He also has refused point blank to provide any proof he ever went to Kenya, Kenyan officials have said the BC he tried to sell on Ebay is a fake, its nothing like any Kenyan BC, and it has a name of a hospital administrator that didn't take office till 4 months after he claims he got the BC.
jjoshaugh 2 months ago
@bsteadman1 It does not matter his place of birth. He could have been born on the steps to the Capitol in Washington D.C. He cannot hold the office because there is NO WAY he can be a Natural Born Citizen as his father is a citizen of Kenya. This removes the need for a birth certificate or place of birth. Best yet Obama admits his father is a citizen of Kenya. he can't back out (at least legally)
Naterz100 2 months ago
@Naterz100 -- You are, of course, correct on this, at least according to legal logic.... However, I do NOT have confidence that our POSSIBLY-COMPROMISED Supreme Court would interpret Minor v Happersett correctly! I believe it would be best to bring CRIMINAL CHARGES FIRST against BHO-II, before SCOTUS can set some STUPID PRECEDENT. The BC-fraud and the SSN-fraud issues can be handled at the State or County level by ordinary law enforcement and don't need to involve SCOTUS. Just my opinion!
bsteadman1 2 months ago
Courageous Great Americans defending our Constitution more need to now do the same all across this land in every state... God Speed to you all..
VotersWakeUp 2 months ago 2
I love the fact that "regular people" who are elected are pursuing the truth like this. These people are not "slick lawyers" but relatively "normal folk." :-)
foxmuldr 2 months ago 2