Dr Santer he is right on the money unfortunately even current scientists still don't know how Co/2 effects our environment. If truly they want to prove their case they have to go always down to molecular level see why is that Carbon dioxide harming our environment. All those arguments are meaningless unless scientists can show why CO/2 harming our environment. I'm in the potion to do that & I will very soon.
@blackadderthe4 My point was, most of the scientists not all of them! Why in the world then they will argue against global warming, even children they notice something wrong with our weather pattern?
@blackadderthe4 You see any body whatever they want they will say including you. Lets take the facts & go with wherever that will take us. Why do you thing all the gases they don't function the same? If you truly want to know why Dr. Santer or I think carbon dioxide is harmful for our environment. You have to see weather pattern Dr. Santer go the changes happen within our inner space. In my case I can give you more solid facts about carbon dioxide why is that all the changes happened.
@blackadderthe4 I agree with you 100%. I will encourage you watch my future video clips I'm preparing for global warming it will be ready within the month. You will understand why is it carbon dioxide effecting our weather pattern. Even though current scientists go according changes happens within inner space but they still don't know how CO/2 effecting our environment what is the main cause?
"If solar effects were that large on a 60yr timescale we would see".
OMG! I remember 1961 to 1964 minima! The mid 70's cooling until 76 where we became a tinderbox! Then it was warmer until Thatcher was out. This past decade has been well poo.
'1961 to 1964' three YEARS, numpty it takes decades to measure climate and that would only be regional anyhow, the UK is not global as far as I'm aware! Go back and see if you can join an infants school and see if you can learn something this time!
Why does it matter if we are causing global warming or not? If the world is warming and it could have catasrophic effects, why does it matter if we caused it or not? Why shouldn't we make an effort to help save the world either way?
'why does it matter if we caused it or not?' because the world will go on regardless, without any people on it! But we could take action to prvent it from happening.
Traders raided England for slaves long before 'America' was discovered! What's this with all your paranoia, 'Nobody likes us!'. We know that’s for good reasons, just saying, but relax, once China then India overtake you (pretty soon), they’ll take the pressure off Uncle Sam. 'Dr. Santer is apparently one of those folks who cannot grasp the direct correlation between changes in solar forcing and our warming' so why is Venus warmer than Mercury? It's the atmosphere, KIS for S!
@blackadderthe4 It is true! CO2 is a globe warming gas but studies have proven its only so when concentrations are extremely high. The curve is almost logarithmic.
Venus has no magnetosphere. That is why there is no water, it is blown out into space which explains Earths excess of water.. The air is so dense that a balloon of oxygen or water vapour would float.
Comparing Earths future with its available combustible carbon to Venus will certainly render you into the tinfoil hat brigade.
'Where's the identical planets to compare off?' I don't understand! But I assume you are talking about a control? Well that can be achieved. to a high level of accuracy by coumputer models!
@blackadderthe4 That was quick!!The video's I suggested you watch are a series of six. So you will not take the proof into account? ookk.. We know you now.
The hockey stick graph was from a single source sample of tree rings. The idiot assumed ring growth is down to temperature, not CO2 levels or rain growth.
They manipulated away the warm period in the middle ages.
They calculated assumptions of positive feedback where CO2 - warmer, more clouds, more warming. There is no such fact in history.
'So you will not take the proof into account?' you're very loose with the term proof are you not? What deniers term as proof are myths, mis-information. distortions and down right lies! In other words anything the so called 'Lord' Monckton says!
@blackadderthe4 Seeing as AGW is now entirely discredited by all scientists outside the 33 brown noses at the IPCC. Lead by a man who got a nobel prize as a scientist but is really a railway engineer (ex porn book writer) working for a massive industrial giant...
'You have replied within the ten minutes of the video I gave you' yes because I download the videos and whilst it's downloading I can reply to comments! Mega numpty! IDIOT.
@blackadderthe4 You reply before the video is done? You have no credibility. Like your video's, people aint interested no matter how much you are paid.
I wonder if we'll see -14C again in Wigan? That was incredibly low! Let's hope the Sun starts to roil well soon 'cos its very cold already!
Dr. Santer is apparently one of those folks who cannot grasp the direct correlation between changes in solar forcing and our warming ( 1880 ) then cooling ( 1945 ) then warming again ( 1978 ) then cooling again ( 2009 ) world.
NASA told us of reduced solar forcing in 2009. We've seen record cold and storm events around the world since, causing havoc, compounded by the political Left forcing nations to BURN FOOD FOR FUEL to "go green". Food shortages result.
BlackAdder could not figure out the climate science credentials of the head of the IPCC, Rajindra Pachauri. That's because he doesn't have any. He is a political player doing a lot of "consulting" with organizations that will be directly affected by the policies crafted by the IPCC, as the IPCC modifies scientist contributions to fit their policy plans.
The IPCC is a major player in this global money-stealing scam and is not a scientific body.
It's time to heed what NASA is telling us about the sun, the forcing agent that has driven our recent warming ( 1880 ), then cooling ( 1945 ), then warming ( 1978 ), now cooling ( 2009 )...
"Since the late 1970s, the amount of solar radiation the sun emits, during times of quiet sunspot activity, has increased by nearly .05 percent per decade"
All that remains is to get the IPCC, a political body, to stop ignoring the amplifying effects of water under solar output fluctuations.
'the IPCC, a political body' your paranoia is getting the better of you again! But then again 'It's time to heed what NASA is telling us about the sun' is NASA not another political body? Come on make your mind up, you are contradicting yourself! You'll be saying the armed forces are controlled by the communists! 'Yet, China's aerosol pollutant output dwarfs' and now you are becoming insecure because the USA is soon to be a second world power to China. Live with it!
@blackadderthe4 Okay, tell us the climate science credentials of the head of the IPCC, Rajindra Pachauri. Or its policymakers.
NASA also suffers political control - which is why it's so easy to disregard that one sentence about "greenhouse gases" in a report on how the sun is warming.
You won't like a world dominated by China. That's a certainty.
Americans don't "live with it" - they fight for their liberty. The Communist usurper in the White House s awakening that sleeping giant.
@blackadderthe4 It's a fact that NASA is subject to political manipulation as well. Obama, the guy with the Muslim upbringing, tasked NASA with spending OUR tax dollars on "Muslim Outreach", to engage in making Muslims feel good about themselves.
The President directing a Government institution to spend our tax dollars to promote a specific religion... Where's the ACLU?
'NASA is subject to political' so in that case why did you make your last statement 'it's time to heed what NASA is telling us', so this means you are seriously confused! Why do you believe NASA but not the IPCC. And I don't think Musims are the major problem, after all it was Blair, who said AGW was a bigger threat than global terrorism!
@blackadderthe4 I take seriously what the contributing scientists are presenting as evidence, even with the IPCC. It's their political leadership that tries to twist and deceive.
NASA's SORCE satellite is providing us with plenty of useful data, such as the recent solar warming ( 2004 ) and solar cooling ( 2009 ).
Nasa's James Hansen is a political servant, ignoring the scientific data, is managed by George Soros and is spewing BS to keep the Soros cash coming.
@blackadderthe4 Update: NASA, James Hansen, and the Politicization of Science - Soros Foundation gave Hansen $720,000, orchestrated his media campaign
@blackadderthe4 "I don't think Musims are the major problem"
You will not realize how wrong you are until it is too late. Muslims have worked out this process. Once upon a time there were no Muslim nations - now look how many.
Well how come Americans were major supporters of the IRA during The Troubles, with their terrorist acts! And serious action was only taken against them after 911,that was their nail in the coffin, up to then they were invited guests at The White House, St Patricks day, etc! And there has been Islamic states for hundreds of years before America was even thought of! So once upon a time there was no America, but plenty of Islamic states! It looks as if the KKK is still alive.
@blackadderthe4 What's this have to do with the KKK and the Democrat Party that kept re-electing one of their recruiters until the guy died? Nothing.
Yes, as soon as the USA was created, the Islamist Caliphate issued a mandate - submit or be attacked. It took Thomas Jefferson to read the Koran and inform the Senate - the only two options are to submit or fight back with overwhelming violence to remain free. They created the Navy and Marine Corps.
You don't want to face up to the fact that Americans supported the IRA until after 911 and then it was too hot a potato to handle! Are you saying that when America was formed it was threatened by the Muslims and that's why the navy was created? But was the navy not created to fight in the War Independence, because it's first land action was to attack Whitehaven! Which is still celebrated by US forces in Whitehaven! 'overwhelming violence' Oh HOW?
The USS Constitution (“Old Ironsides”) and her sister ship, the USS Constellation, were built to wage war on the Muslim pirates operating along North Africa’s Barbary coast. Do you know why the Marine Corps song includes "to the shores of Tripoli"?
So, this seems to assert that if "global warming" is a problem, we need only relax some of the emissions restrictions on US factories to solve it and return to the cooling effects of 1945 to 1980.
Yet, China's aerosol pollutant output dwarfs industrial output from that time.
Dr Santer he is right on the money unfortunately even current scientists still don't know how Co/2 effects our environment. If truly they want to prove their case they have to go always down to molecular level see why is that Carbon dioxide harming our environment. All those arguments are meaningless unless scientists can show why CO/2 harming our environment. I'm in the potion to do that & I will very soon.
Levon9404 4 months ago
@Levon9404
'even current scientists still don't know how Co/2 effects our environment'
watch?v=r0tJEkldmf4
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 My point was, most of the scientists not all of them! Why in the world then they will argue against global warming, even children they notice something wrong with our weather pattern?
Levon9404 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 You see any body whatever they want they will say including you. Lets take the facts & go with wherever that will take us. Why do you thing all the gases they don't function the same? If you truly want to know why Dr. Santer or I think carbon dioxide is harmful for our environment. You have to see weather pattern Dr. Santer go the changes happen within our inner space. In my case I can give you more solid facts about carbon dioxide why is that all the changes happened.
Levon9404 4 months ago
@Levon9404
Well my point is, seen as co2 is a known GHG, then given the levels of man made co2 it must be having an effect.
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 I agree with you 100%. I will encourage you watch my future video clips I'm preparing for global warming it will be ready within the month. You will understand why is it carbon dioxide effecting our weather pattern. Even though current scientists go according changes happens within inner space but they still don't know how CO/2 effecting our environment what is the main cause?
Levon9404 4 months ago
"If solar effects were that large on a 60yr timescale we would see".
OMG! I remember 1961 to 1964 minima! The mid 70's cooling until 76 where we became a tinderbox! Then it was warmer until Thatcher was out. This past decade has been well poo.
I WANT MORE CO2!!!!
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'1961 to 1964' three YEARS, numpty it takes decades to measure climate and that would only be regional anyhow, the UK is not global as far as I'm aware! Go back and see if you can join an infants school and see if you can learn something this time!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Numbty. I was talking about the SOLAR WEATHER!
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
I hope you professional deniers have put money aside for therapy for their kids.
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 It is you who is the man in denial. As goes professional. I can't imagine them paying you much.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'As goes professional' yet more gibberish! English must not be your first language or you're on drugs!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Keep the attacks personal because you have no fair argument.
AGW paranoia will not work.
Wiki "Solar variation". Your game is over.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
You simpleton!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@blackadderthe4 Wiki "Solar variation". Your game is over.
m1aws 4 months ago
Why does it matter if we are causing global warming or not? If the world is warming and it could have catasrophic effects, why does it matter if we caused it or not? Why shouldn't we make an effort to help save the world either way?
Typhoonbladefist 5 months ago
@Typhoonbladefist
'why does it matter if we caused it or not?' because the world will go on regardless, without any people on it! But we could take action to prvent it from happening.
blackadderthe4 5 months ago
@blackadderthe4 I think you didn't read what I said at all; I concur. The "debate" is obviously a moot point.
Typhoonbladefist 5 months ago
@Typhoonbladefist
I misunderstood!
blackadderthe4 5 months ago
One more thing, BlackAdder - I link straight to the comments section here so I won't bump up your view count when I come to educate you.
Just sayin'.
AmericaSpeakOut1 1 year ago
@AmericaSpeakOut1
Traders raided England for slaves long before 'America' was discovered! What's this with all your paranoia, 'Nobody likes us!'. We know that’s for good reasons, just saying, but relax, once China then India overtake you (pretty soon), they’ll take the pressure off Uncle Sam. 'Dr. Santer is apparently one of those folks who cannot grasp the direct correlation between changes in solar forcing and our warming' so why is Venus warmer than Mercury? It's the atmosphere, KIS for S!
blackadderthe4 1 year ago
@blackadderthe4 It is true! CO2 is a globe warming gas but studies have proven its only so when concentrations are extremely high. The curve is almost logarithmic.
Venus has no magnetosphere. That is why there is no water, it is blown out into space which explains Earths excess of water.. The air is so dense that a balloon of oxygen or water vapour would float.
Comparing Earths future with its available combustible carbon to Venus will certainly render you into the tinfoil hat brigade.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'It is true! CO2 is a globe warming gas but studies have proven its only so when concentrations are extremely high' not so
watch?v=f-3-Lf4-49M
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 watched it.. Where's the identical planets to compare off?
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'Where's the identical planets to compare off?' I don't understand! But I assume you are talking about a control? Well that can be achieved. to a high level of accuracy by coumputer models!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 I have a few computer games too. Not seen nor had to shoot a real Demon yet!
p.s. All the IPCC computer drawings have been utterly discredited.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
‘I have a few computer games too' an no doubt run on a Sinclair Spectrum! LOL.
'All the IPCC computer drawings have been utterly discredited' BOLLARDS
watch?v=SfN9F9dvjaQ
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 That was quick!!The video's I suggested you watch are a series of six. So you will not take the proof into account? ookk.. We know you now.
The hockey stick graph was from a single source sample of tree rings. The idiot assumed ring growth is down to temperature, not CO2 levels or rain growth.
They manipulated away the warm period in the middle ages.
They calculated assumptions of positive feedback where CO2 - warmer, more clouds, more warming. There is no such fact in history.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'So you will not take the proof into account?' you're very loose with the term proof are you not? What deniers term as proof are myths, mis-information. distortions and down right lies! In other words anything the so called 'Lord' Monckton says!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Seeing as AGW is now entirely discredited by all scientists outside the 33 brown noses at the IPCC. Lead by a man who got a nobel prize as a scientist but is really a railway engineer (ex porn book writer) working for a massive industrial giant...
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'but is really a railway engineer' so what? 'Einstein's position at the Swiss Patent Office became permanent'.
'AGW is now entirely discredited by all scientists outside the 33 brown noses at the IPCC' links to the info please?
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 The video I told you to watch earlier but you wouldn't. Tell you what. Lets move on Mr. Scientist or political statist. Whatever.
Answer this:
youtube. Al Gore: I Was Wrong About Global Warming... Learn About It
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
Why don't you provide valid links? What are you running from?
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 Whats the point. You don't follow nor provide any valid links yourself.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
BOLLARDS!
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 You have replied within the ten minutes of the video I gave you on your other video. Therefore your words have no meaning to me.
And you call me a liar!!!! Your credibility is now zero.
m1aws 4 months ago
@m1aws
'You have replied within the ten minutes of the video I gave you' yes because I download the videos and whilst it's downloading I can reply to comments! Mega numpty! IDIOT.
blackadderthe4 4 months ago
@blackadderthe4 You reply before the video is done? You have no credibility. Like your video's, people aint interested no matter how much you are paid.
I wonder if we'll see -14C again in Wigan? That was incredibly low! Let's hope the Sun starts to roil well soon 'cos its very cold already!
m1aws 4 months ago
If you show a little honesty, you would of watched the 10 minute video. As you are a closed eyed bigot then your words have no meaning to me.
Or anyone who reads this.
m1aws 4 months ago
Dr. Santer is apparently one of those folks who cannot grasp the direct correlation between changes in solar forcing and our warming ( 1880 ) then cooling ( 1945 ) then warming again ( 1978 ) then cooling again ( 2009 ) world.
NASA told us of reduced solar forcing in 2009. We've seen record cold and storm events around the world since, causing havoc, compounded by the political Left forcing nations to BURN FOOD FOR FUEL to "go green". Food shortages result.
Evil is as evil does.
AmericaSpeakOut1 1 year ago
BlackAdder could not figure out the climate science credentials of the head of the IPCC, Rajindra Pachauri. That's because he doesn't have any. He is a political player doing a lot of "consulting" with organizations that will be directly affected by the policies crafted by the IPCC, as the IPCC modifies scientist contributions to fit their policy plans.
The IPCC is a major player in this global money-stealing scam and is not a scientific body.
AmericaSpeakOut1 1 year ago
It's time to heed what NASA is telling us about the sun, the forcing agent that has driven our recent warming ( 1880 ), then cooling ( 1945 ), then warming ( 1978 ), now cooling ( 2009 )...
"Since the late 1970s, the amount of solar radiation the sun emits, during times of quiet sunspot activity, has increased by nearly .05 percent per decade"
All that remains is to get the IPCC, a political body, to stop ignoring the amplifying effects of water under solar output fluctuations.
AmericaSpeakOut1 1 year ago
@AmericaSpeakOut1
'the IPCC, a political body' your paranoia is getting the better of you again! But then again 'It's time to heed what NASA is telling us about the sun' is NASA not another political body? Come on make your mind up, you are contradicting yourself! You'll be saying the armed forces are controlled by the communists! 'Yet, China's aerosol pollutant output dwarfs' and now you are becoming insecure because the USA is soon to be a second world power to China. Live with it!
blackadderthe4 1 year ago
@blackadderthe4 Okay, tell us the climate science credentials of the head of the IPCC, Rajindra Pachauri. Or its policymakers.
NASA also suffers political control - which is why it's so easy to disregard that one sentence about "greenhouse gases" in a report on how the sun is warming.
You won't like a world dominated by China. That's a certainty.
Americans don't "live with it" - they fight for their liberty. The Communist usurper in the White House s awakening that sleeping giant.
AmericaSpeakOut1 1 year ago
@blackadderthe4 It's a fact that NASA is subject to political manipulation as well. Obama, the guy with the Muslim upbringing, tasked NASA with spending OUR tax dollars on "Muslim Outreach", to engage in making Muslims feel good about themselves.
The President directing a Government institution to spend our tax dollars to promote a specific religion... Where's the ACLU?
AmericaSpeakOut1 1 year ago
@AmericaSpeakOut1
'NASA is subject to political' so in that case why did you make your last statement 'it's time to heed what NASA is telling us', so this means you are seriously confused! Why do you believe NASA but not the IPCC. And I don't think Musims are the major problem, after all it was Blair, who said AGW was a bigger threat than global terrorism!
blackadderthe4 1 year ago
@blackadderthe4 I take seriously what the contributing scientists are presenting as evidence, even with the IPCC. It's their political leadership that tries to twist and deceive.
NASA's SORCE satellite is providing us with plenty of useful data, such as the recent solar warming ( 2004 ) and solar cooling ( 2009 ).
Nasa's James Hansen is a political servant, ignoring the scientific data, is managed by George Soros and is spewing BS to keep the Soros cash coming.
AmericaSpeakOut1 1 year ago
@blackadderthe4 Update: NASA, James Hansen, and the Politicization of Science - Soros Foundation gave Hansen $720,000, orchestrated his media campaign
dailytech. com/Update+NASA+James+Hansen+and+the+Politicization+of+Science/article9061.htm
James Hansen’s Former NASA Supervisor Says Hansen ‘Embarrassed NASA’
epw. senate. gov/public/index.cfm? FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=1A5E6E32-802A-23AD-40ED-ECD53CD3D320
AmericaSpeakOut1 1 year ago
@blackadderthe4 "I don't think Musims are the major problem"
You will not realize how wrong you are until it is too late. Muslims have worked out this process. Once upon a time there were no Muslim nations - now look how many.
Understanding Jihad - Dr. Israr Ahmad
institutealislam. com/understanding-jihad-striving-in-the-cause-of-allah-by-dr-israr-ahmad/
Decide whether you will convert, submit, be killed or fight with superior violence to keep yourself free. Those are your only choices.
AmericaSpeakOut1 1 year ago
@AmericaSpeakOut1
Well how come Americans were major supporters of the IRA during The Troubles, with their terrorist acts! And serious action was only taken against them after 911,that was their nail in the coffin, up to then they were invited guests at The White House, St Patricks day, etc! And there has been Islamic states for hundreds of years before America was even thought of! So once upon a time there was no America, but plenty of Islamic states! It looks as if the KKK is still alive.
blackadderthe4 1 year ago
@blackadderthe4 What's this have to do with the KKK and the Democrat Party that kept re-electing one of their recruiters until the guy died? Nothing.
Yes, as soon as the USA was created, the Islamist Caliphate issued a mandate - submit or be attacked. It took Thomas Jefferson to read the Koran and inform the Senate - the only two options are to submit or fight back with overwhelming violence to remain free. They created the Navy and Marine Corps.
We are straying. Let's get back on climate.
AmericaSpeakOut1 1 year ago
@AmericaSpeakOut1
You don't want to face up to the fact that Americans supported the IRA until after 911 and then it was too hot a potato to handle! Are you saying that when America was formed it was threatened by the Muslims and that's why the navy was created? But was the navy not created to fight in the War Independence, because it's first land action was to attack Whitehaven! Which is still celebrated by US forces in Whitehaven! 'overwhelming violence' Oh HOW?
blackadderthe4 1 year ago
@blackadderthe4 1 ) This conversation is about environment.
2 ) Learn.
lcweb2. loc. gov/ammem/collections/jefferson_papers/mtjprece.html
The USS Constitution (“Old Ironsides”) and her sister ship, the USS Constellation, were built to wage war on the Muslim pirates operating along North Africa’s Barbary coast. Do you know why the Marine Corps song includes "to the shores of Tripoli"?
marines. com/main/index/winning_battles/history/missions/battle_of_derna
Now, BACK TO THE SUBJECT.
AmericaSpeakOut1 1 year ago
So, this seems to assert that if "global warming" is a problem, we need only relax some of the emissions restrictions on US factories to solve it and return to the cooling effects of 1945 to 1980.
Yet, China's aerosol pollutant output dwarfs industrial output from that time.
Something is amiss in these claims.
AmericaSpeakOut1 1 year ago