Added: 2 years ago
From: CYDCopenhagen
Views: 508
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • wow. I can just imagine a group of scientists plotting and scheming on how they are going to 'TRICK THE WORLD' into believing in climate change. I mean, they have SO much to gain by concocting a mad conspiracy that says this things called climate change could actually harm us....

    Somehow I don't think the worlds leading scientists stand much to gain my scaremongering.... The real question is, why are some people so scared to accept that climate change is here and is real and is very serious?

  • antartic ice

    1979 - 15 million km

    2010 - 16 million km.

    Thats right, AGW caused antartica's ice sheet to grow 1 million km's!!! artic ice

    1979 - 15 million km

    2010 - 14 million km

    Hey whats that?? 1 million km melted from the north and 1 million km grew in the south?

    That means the net change is about????? ZERO.

  • Add to that the lowest ice minimum was 2007 (the picture gore used) but the minimum is now 500,000 kms greater than in 2007!!! Thats 500,000 square km's MORE ice. And GROWING. The 2007 date is interesting as well since the warmest year on record was 1998 according to the data that the ipcc used. Therefore the lowest ice minimum should have been 1998, not 2007. And in fact in 1998, the ice minimum was bearly 300,000 km less than 1979!!!

  • The highest ice minimum was 1981 and the lowest ice maximum was 2007. 2007, that means the ice maximums have increased as well!!! by 750,000 km's!!!

    AGW is a myth.

  • Don't be a blind follower.

    THINK FOR YOURSELF

    Don't believe the people who will make money off of AGW and carbon credits!!!

    Its a money making SCAM!!!

  • Did you pull these stats out of your ass?Even if this shit were true it's not just about global warming it's about the environment. if you think the Canada's or the first world's status quo is ok when it comes to pollution and other environmental concerns then... u r dum

  • I pulled them out of the NOAA database.

    This is really funny, me being called dumb for actualy looking at the current data by a person who didn't even try to spell "you are dumb"

    If you want to argue pollution issues then do so, no need for this scaremongering crap.

  • you cherry picked your 'data'.

    on AVERAGE and also depending on what time period you look at the antarctic is only increasing at a rate of .8% per decade while the arctic is decreasing at a rate of 2.5 % or more. Also how do you explain the current pollution haze over the arctic which is speeding up the melting of the ice? human's couldn't have possibly caused that.

    So even if there's a small 'net change' the wildlife in the arctic suffers.

    BUT who cares about them amirite?!?

  • Not I picked the last 2 years which should have shown ice melting if your theory is right. It didn't. Direct observation proves your theory wrong.

    The arctic haze peaked in 1979. Its reducing.

  • And my name is bobjon38 not amirite

    You know what? I care more about the economic well being of the people than arctic creatures that aren't threatened at all. (hint, it was warmer during the midevil warm period yet magicaly those creatures survived)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more