Nuclear Missiles

[stealthynuker32]

Why did you Put the ending of termenator3

[DearHJ]

美国是个军国主义国家

[pmgodfrey]

I've always hated this song.

[CryDevil1231]

2:53 WTF so many nuclear bomb .i wander if one missle suck the whole missle suck and the COUNTRY SUCKKK THAT MEAN THAT COUNTRY DOOM!!

[markkussusa]

@CryDevil1231 I think it's from the movie terminator 3... Towards the end Skynet launches the attack despite the best efforts of Shwartzy :)

[startobee]

Any time GHost saw this video:

"Nuclear Missile in the air! Code black!"

[DarkHour404]

O hey look everyone its "let the bodies set the floor" youtube really needs more of thiis song because this song is so underated and underused.

[lolspys]

LOL was at 3:27 there is a mac sign?

[MrLovefile]

SICK TO DEATH OF THIS DAM TUNE LON EVERY WAR VID!!!! BAN IT!!!

[1982FMJ]

nuclear missiles malfunction so don't count on being protected by them. also don't count on them protecting you from an enemy who wants to destroy everything including themselves. I gues we will never no about the united states missile counter defence system they have in space. thats is never talked about or made public and is hihgly classified. I'm guessing they long range laser cannons.

[SopelUK]

is a nuclear war starts, the next one will be on sticks

[Xluisx4000]

@Alexis22ize yo ablo espanol i estados unidos tienen esos missiles

[SibirianHusky]

nothing against topol -m

[101andrewj]

somebody nuke me

[P08Luger1]

@101andrewj sorry mate my bad :DDD

[alexis22ize]

si

se que quisa ninguno de ustedes hable español ,

pero alguien me podria decir que País tiene esos misiles tan poderosos  y de largo alcanze. ??

espero su respuesta

[fjoseyahoo]

wait what country is launching these missles. there launching them as if there not a big deal

[Loxleiev]

@fjoseyahoo those are duds dude, chill =P, and they are american, minuteman 3

[coolraultusabez]

I believe it was from a television series on CBS that ran two seasons long named Jericho.

[Mr29andMrs29]

What scene was that last part from? Anybody know?

[eLpeach]

@Mr29andMrs29

the terminator movie, i belive the the second to newest one that came out

[marcelzevenaar]

therminator 3

[HeadNtheClouds]

Was that a scene from Smallville when you showed the barn & farm at 2:55?

[Kikematamitos]

cren que se llegue a esto?

[NarowAR07]

yep i saw him he was running for he's life he probly survived :D

[mpwelk]

the most stale song on youtube

[TheD2JBug]

And this is about the only video it works on too :P

[subsonictonic]

@mpwelk

Not only stale but awful to begin with.

Not sure why anyone would want to use this track alongside video of nuclear weapons, unless they have some romantic notions about the use of nukes.

[jasonthegame10]

dude if dat happens most of us will be heavily injured or dead

[95predator]

please do never use them! please!

[LikeAVideo]

LOL i see it ROFL he must died from the shockwave

[anderlon214]

Tudo tecnologia roubada dos alemães na segunda guerra!!!

[halo3catmaster1234]

2.52-3.30 thats how fall out 3 begins and became a wasteland...lol

[NvidaGeforce]

the name of the song is

Drowning Pool let the bodie's hit the flor

[Oldguyvoices]

cool song

[jakex488]

wow the ending was awesome haha world war III

[badas03]

dude that video rulz

[badas03]

fucking awesomne

[mboom0001]

if someone where to fire a nuka at china they would be fucked, same with russia.

[XcelentTom]

Nuclear Weapons are very very VERY bad for Planet Conditions... There is already a bomb that is better than the Nuke... I don't know it's name somebody help? It's not nuclear powered...

[Shifticek]

there is no bomb better than nuclear bomb but the best non-nuclear bomb is, atleast as i heard, MOAB (GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb or Mother Of All Bombs :] )

[viper94topgun]

hydro bomb or something like that it adds hydrogen in with the uranium or plutonium which makes it alot bigger

[XcelentTom]

@ viper94topgun

Yes that was it!

Thnx!

[Mogzyx]

Hydrogen

[XcelentTom]

@ Mogzyx

Thnx!

[Gunslinger145]

The H-Bomb is nuclear powered. It uses 2 unstable isotopes of Hydrogen and pressurizes them until nuclear fusion occurs. During this process 2 Hydrogen atoms are forced into a single Helium atom. Since the Helium atom is much more stable, less energy is required to keep it's nucleus constant. The extra energy is expelled in the form of heat and radiation.

The sun works in a very similar way.

[XcelentTom]

@ Gunslinger145

I think Thanks??

[erkukamaka]

3:11 fallout 3 is begins!

[Taterizer]

Well at least the threat of global nuclear conflict is almost a thing of the past. There is still a nuclear terrorism threat, a very real one, but I don't really see Russia firing off ICBMs anymore.

[ukrainesuperpower87]

Russia actively developing and testing new ICBMs and SLBMs during last decade.

[RNZ1983]

the funny thing is, before man created something that would help decrease his independence on oil or things that helped clean up the planet and reduce waste, man kind invested in bombs and weapons....

[kevincook88]

the end was from terminator 2-_-

[Lolixelia]

if your talking about the nukes going off around the world, that was Terminator 3

[zwyce]

its a man who is runnin away : D

[umahuma4]

The bodies, the will defintly hit the floor

[Shifticek]

they won't, they will vaporize in the air:]

[SOCOM1072]

lol

LOOK AT 1:54 IS THAT SOMEONE RUNNING ?!

SUCKS TO BE HIM :D

[cj2006sd]

yeah it is!!!! It was soo funny I just had to put it in! lol

[umahuma4]

hes like, shit, im dead

[DEATHTOESAU]

wow, The Most High Ain't play, time is almost up.

[555D3M0N666]

however the Ak designed Upper receiver with a Gas Operated Rotating Bolt is the ONLY thing that makes an AK reliable OTHER THAN a loose fit upper receiver.

the AK is a great weapon yes.. BUT the AK107 fires an intermediate round with Horrible Ballistics. the AK47 and 74 fire the STandard 7.62 but have shorter ranges and a larger spread pattern than the M16.. if i have no idea where im going, yeah i want an AK. if i need to make a perfect shot.. M16 and ill remeber to keep my weapon clean.

[dimentionalrift]

The Trident II is an SLBM, not a cruise missile. The tomahawk is not that advanced either. America has other far more advanced cruise missiles. America needs another cold war - that is the only way we'll get to see insane technological developments that will bring America back to being number one, which is where it belongs!

[dimentionalrift]

"why was their MBT crap compared to the Abrams" - its not. The T-90 has a automatic loader - the Abrams has manuel. The T-90 is lower and wider making it less detectable while the Abrams is huge. The abrams is 30 years old while the T-90 is 14. The T-90 can launch AT missiles and it has a bigger caliber. The T-90 has a hightech replacement ready for 2010 while the Abrams has no successor planned - at some point in the near future no upgrade in the world will save it.

[dimentionalrift]

Also America can no longer build any new M1A2 tanks because the factory that made the engines closed down in 1993. America is far from what it used to be. So many cut backs, so many cancellations, so much paperwork just to get a tiny UAV approved...even a tiny country like Israel had some tricks that made the CIA scratch their heads, and that was back in 1987...and now the democrates are in control - a bunch of left sissys that feel bad for torturing people that would kill a thousand for fun.

[555D3M0N666]

and if the Russians are so technologically advanced.. why was their Main battle tank.. Crap compared to the Abrams.. or why is the AK horribly inaccurate.. or better yet. why has EVERY Peice of Military hardware they have EVER put out been outpreformed, Outclassed and Outdone by NATO... "SATAN" Technology.

the ONLY thing russia has going for it ... the AK is nearly Impossible to shut down.. but good luck hitting anything past 250 Yards = .22 rimfire distance.

[ukrainesuperpower87]

"Crap compared to the Abrams"

Prove it. Abrams never fought against equal equiped and modern Russian tanks. Don't talk about "Desert storm"

Iraqi T-55(tank from 1950's!!!) and some crappy iraqi-made T-72 clones were joke

"or why is the AK horribly inaccurate"

Bullshit. This stupid opinion simply based on experience with cheap Chinese AK-47 copies and poor ammunition.

Ak-74m and modern Ak-100s series are very accurate rifles, accuracy comparable to m16 but with much better reliability

[555D3M0N666]

ill give you the Tanks on the technicality that they havent engaged but the Abrams is bottom of the Line the Best Tank on the Modern battlefield.

and i HAVE an AK47

Mint condition

and an M16A3 Mint Condition

Ak47 Max Effective range is 338 Meters

M16A3 Max effective Range is 540 Meters

the 7.62x39mm AK Round travels nearly 400 Mph slower than the .223 Nato (5.56x45mm)

given it has a higer Balistic performance. with what will take the ak 4 or 5 shots to hit. the M16 WILL hit in one.

[555D3M0N666]

the AK isnt as accurate as the M16 BECAUSE its clearances and Mill specs are looser which is what allows it to be reliable.. the gun itself is a showstopper at close range and is near impossible to shut down. but if you have to take marksman shots at something longer than a football field away... your kind of sunk

[ukrainesuperpower87]

"the AK isnt as accurate as the M16"

It's depends on AK type.

Ak-74 almost as accurate as m16.

Ak-107(almost recoilles) is more accurate than m16.

"something longer than a football field away... your kind of sunk"

Failed. It's possible to do longer range shots with AK-74 or later. Even it's possible with Ak-47 (well-produced AK with quality ammunition).

[555D3M0N666]

really cause at 500 yards i can put a 7 inch grouping with and M16A3 using its standard sights..

a Stock AK with Federal (which is about as good of 7.62 as your gonna get) can only reach out to about 280 yards before the round begins to suffer from the correialis effect. and starts to drop.. at 328 yards your NOT gonna get much more range from the AK. because its design is alot less Precise than the M16 is designed crudely.

[ukrainesuperpower87]

"Abrams is bottom of the Line the Best Tank on the Modern battlefield"

Too much slogans from you, not arguments. Abrams - the Best Tank on the Modern battlefield? Maybe... But it was not proven yet.

"and i HAVE an AK47"

Probably, you have poor cheap copy from Romania or China? Hey, it's not AK!

"the 7.62x39mm AK Round travels nearly 400 Mph slower than the .223 Nato "

So? Ak-74 has 5.45x39mm round with similar ballistics to NATO round, but with better penetration.

[555D3M0N666]

no the Rifle i have is a RUSSIAN MADE..

Kalashnikov Number 47

blued steel and cheery stock that i had added cause it adds to the look of the rifle with a Darker stock.

however EVERYTHING else is all original and only a year old.

but Barrett sells a Upper receiver for the M4 Carbine that embarrasses both the AK and M16.

it punches the M4 out to 6.8x45mm and has the same reliability as the AK and HIGHER Kinetic punch, and Better accuracy than and m16.... so whats your point?

[555D3M0N666]

and the Modern M16A3 has the SAME Reliability rating at the AK as a matter of fact THATS WHERE THE 74 AND 100 GET THEIR ACCURACY.

the CV74 is the American Version of the AK. which Still isnt as accurate.

it was NEVER ment to be a Precision Fire Arm, it was ment to still fire its ammo in nearly any condition. but with that you get drawbacks as well. AWSOME RIFLE... no Doubt. but not perfect

[ukrainesuperpower87]

"Modern M16A3 has the SAME Reliability rating at the AK"

Sorry, but A3 still can not match AK in terms of reliability in harsh conditions. m16a3 still has not important fixes to prevent jamming, it's still uses unreliable direct gas system.

"WHERE THE 74 AND 100 GET THEIR ACCURACY."

Small round caliber, effective muzzle break, better sights(optional).

"it was NEVER ment to be a Precision Fire Arm"

AK is COMBAT RIFLE that works in any conditions. For precision It would better to use SVD.

[dimentionalrift]

In terms of naval forces, America is at the moment the world leader both in technology and in numbers. In terms of air supiriority, America has the advantage of technology over Russia but Russia outnumbers America nearly 4:1. In terms of ground forces, America no longer has any real advantage against both the technology and the numbers of the Russia armor - Russia is making new tank designs while America is making new upgrades.

[dimentionalrift]

First of all, without nukes the Soviet army would've easily crushed NATO and taken over Europe - it's all in the numbers. The US would have to keep most of its ground forces at home so as to provide the protection the cities and bases needed. Nuclear weapons brought a sence of stability. The information you base your words on is incomplete at best. Plus at the moment the only operational ICBM America has that the public knows about is the LGM-30, or Minuteman III.

[555D3M0N666]

we also realized that ICMBs arent ideal... thats what the Cruise Missle was developed for.. we knew the Minuteman and peacekeeper would be outdated and unfit for the needs of a post Modern Military.. so we developed TWO new Missile Systems..

Trident and Tomahawk

[ukrainesuperpower87]

"we also realized that ICMBs arent ideal..."

Why? It's hard to stop ICBM It's impossible to stop ICBMs massive attack

"thats what the Cruise Missle was developed for"

Cruise missiles can not replace ICBMs. It's just made for another tasks

"new Missile Systems

Trident and Tomahawk"

Tomahawk is not good. It's slow and very vulnerable to advanced Russian air defence systems

Trident is good, but not the best in its class. Russian SLBMs "Sineva" and "Bulava" seems to be more advanced.

[555D3M0N666]

there is NO Nation in the WORLD that invests as much as America does in its Military.. thats why america has the Most Powerful Military SOLDEIR TO SOLDIER Obviously China has alot more than us and so did the USSR but.. our technology was higher, our training was better, and our equipment was more efficient.. Without Nuclear arms we would have won the Cold war.. NATO would have handed the soviets their ass.. LOTS OF CASULATIES dont get me wrong but we would have won no questions asked

[banloo29]

2:57 is how all the horror movies start

nuclear + barns = horror

at least that's my theory =]

[555D3M0N666]

ROFL.... nice.. its like Friday the 13th meets the Hills Have Eyes

[xiLuvLife08x]

umm 2:59 was an edit. Camera man and camera would've died.

[555D3M0N666]

well yeah.. only two Atomic weapons have ever been dropped in War on another nation.. Hiroshima and Nagasaki.. and we Dropped them. so yeah the video of the missiles behind the barn and criss crossing int the sky against eachother thats all CG. crazy though, they got the concussions accurate when it his the city the city was gone like INSTANTLY and then the surrounding area was wasted. but yeah had it been real.. we never would have seen the footage.

[GCimprezaFTW]

thank you so much. without you here, i never would've known.

[bloutyben]

its out of terminator

[xyberfunk]

A single US ICBM/MIRV12 could obliterate 35% of Russia's most populous cities. Any launch on the US would be suicide.

[555D3M0N666]

it would only be suicide because we have more missiles than russia and china combined and if either of them Launches a single missile were retaliating full force..

its called MAD

Mutualy Assured Destruction

they might nuke us and cripple us or destroy us. but they wont last long enough to enjoy it.

[illuzn88]

both u 2 and i would be dead if what u said happened so... its kinda pointless

[ukrainesuperpower87]

Russian and US strategic arsenals are almost equal. But Ru has more tactical nukes,

Chinese arsenal and their delivery systems are tiny compared to US/Russia.

MAD is just theory

[555D3M0N666]

yeah Russia has more tactical nukes yes.. but we began work on ideology equal and differing from the Soviets. instead of supplying front lines with Nuclear capable rockets like the Soviets were attempting we began designing the peacekeeper Missile to Deliver more than one warhead at more than one target.

USSR at their peak could destroy the world three times over, at the same time USA could do it 5 times That..

[ukrainesuperpower87]

"we began designing the peacekeeper Missile to Deliver more than one warhead at more than one target."

Thats why Soviets designed SS-18 (NATO - "SATAN")heavy ICBM - the most capable missile ever built.

"USSR at their peak could destroy the world three times over, at the same time USA could do it 5 times"

"Destroy all world X times" - It's just theory, nothing more.

USSR had more nuclear power with its peak in 1980's - more capable missile with more powerful warheads.

[555D3M0N666]

i dont want to really get into an argument about this but for having the most "Capable" Missiles ..... <_< the Russian space station that NASA had to Launch Astronauts in the EARLY 90's in order to repair... the Astronauts came back terrified and said to NEVER Put an American onto a Russian Space platform again because the cosmonauts were working with Garden and Plumbing fittings instead of computers..

and thats in the early 90's not the 60's 70's and 80's

[ukrainesuperpower87]

USSR/Russia had space station, US never had.

"Plumbing fittings" does not prove anything, Maybe they used it because it's more reliable(that very important in space) than computer systems ?

Space station by itself is VERY complicated technology. It's hard to develop modules, launch them and construct station.

Modern international space station was built mostly with Russians help.

[ultimateskinsfan]

I LOVE THIS!!!!!!!!

[MMrrRRTT]

I should also mention that only foolish nuclear war plans would be designed to launch ICBMs simultaneously. After initial use of limited nuclear devices the world would be a very dangerous place and the need for a well-stocked aresenal on full alert would be more important than ever. The doomsday scenario of the world's megatonnage detonating simultaneously is only practical for the drama required in movies or for anti-war statements. Nuclear war would last years if not decades.

[retard2041]

mmrrrrtt ur 100% wrong

[banloo29]

lol we have done it before ust not that manny

[MMrrRRTT]

You are incorrect. 2:59 is only possible through photoediting with the current US ICBM configuration. The US ICBM deployment strategy of "harden and disperse" requires minimum of 3 nautical miles between silos requiring a direct hit on each site to disable missiles. 2:59 shows missiles separated by 1 or 2 miles by my estimation.

[dimentionalrift]

2:59 is possible because silos in a single missile base are quite close to each other. Russia is not more advanced - it's invested in mobility rather than large underground silos. And jsthere, it's not your place to blame everything on the US. Nuclear weapons help just as much as they hurt - they gave us insights and knowledge. And nuclear weapons are the only means of survival for small countries against bigger ones and for big countries to oppose brute nations bent on killing millions.

[ukrainesuperpower87]

"Russia is not more advanced - it's invested in mobility rather than large underground silos"

Hmmm. Did you ever hear about soviet SS-18 missile? It's most powerful ICBM ever built in terms of throw-weight.

It's can be equiped with up to 25 megaton nuclear payload - it's half power of famous "tsar bomba".

Russian road-mobile Topol-based vehicles are their advantage too. Especially in multi-warhead variant(RS-24) packed with new generation MARVs

[huntthejest]

Is there any way you can send me the uncut files used to make this? I'm making a short film about war and I need some missile footage to edit in. Any help would be much appreciated.

[odstjj75]

perfect movie. excelent visuals.

[ukrainesuperpower87]

Russia is ahead to US with their new ICBM/SLBMs

[Dmega007]

Minuteman is a POS. MX was better.

[Jonz66]

3:27 will never happen!!!!

[KJT922010T]

2:59 will never happen

[Dmega007]

I know right. Silo's arent that close.

[jsthere]

3. USA has been there for allmost 8.5 years and whats the damn output when in that many years we could have made this world have less-no pollution help the environment also and save our organisms from extinction from the polution we make...

[chrisruler105]

agreed. but we have benn over there becuace of there "weapons of mass ditroctoin" yet again, we havetn found eneything so y the hell are we over there!

[jsthere]

Now I speak as a non racist and lets suppose no one had fought as a muslim i say humanity has gone wild for the following reasons...

1.Nuclear Weapons bieng built around the world when they could use that money to help our homeless, and poor people

2.We Take part in War because of something you could have delt with your mouth not dagerous weapons and use that money they use to send soldiers to Iraq TO KILL innocents and kill your own Humans.

[peeboxp]

any Fellow EMT MMT FMT on here ?

[rollieroses]

Cool song and footage. USA all the way! Let's not fuckin let our guard down, too many nations hate us and are fuckin desperate to screw us and erase us Americans from the world map.

[Krantzer18]

the russians were way smarter than the american fuckfaces

[jamessmedley82]

If the Russkies "were way smarter than the american fuckfaces", how come the Russkies lost the Cold War and became a humiliated Third World country? And now they're doing pathetic things like sending Tupolev strategic nuclear bombers into British,Japanese and US airspace.I mean,is that supposed to scare us,some ancient decrepit Tu bomber that our RAF fighters can vapourise in a millisecond? Pathetic dumb Soviets.

[hamidrezah]

How come Russian Topol-M rendered your 50 billion dollars ABM system useless and dead before birth?

How come you spent 5 years to occupy a country with no defense and military yet still cannot walk freely in the streets?

How come you went into Vietnam and killed 1 million people just to lose and leave cowardly?

Work on your punctuation college drop out!

[jamessmedley82]

Did you notice I said "our RAF fighters"? I'm British,not Yank.Topol-M didn't render our ABM useless,cause that ABM isn't ours.We DID invade Iraq in tandem with the US,but have you not read that the "surge" is working? And we (BRITS) were never in Vietnam,and BTW,the correct figure is 3 million Viets dead.Given your username,I imagine you're Arab or Iranian,right?Be careful,we might be coming after you next.

[hamidrezah]

Since you are bitish, just to remind you of our forces capturing some of your loser troopers and holding em in custody for weeks! loool!

Surge is not working, it is just a media trick to hide the facts! Recall surge happened in 2007, but 2007 had also the highest toll!

[hamidrezah]

I am Iranian, we have a history of 4000 years!

Stop bullshiting yourself and come to us if you are a man and got balls!

[hamidrezah]

I could give you highschool drop out. Thought that is too degraded for a brit!

Anyway, your punctuation is perhaps worse than both.

How is home pricing decline in britain? In Iran they have been going up 3 fold!

Our nuke program is going forward well, neither united snakes of aggressors nor europe's small (!) three could stop it.

I will post this under both videos.

Now die of anger! lool!

[jamessmedley82]

You're "high school dropout" and "college dropout" jibes really mean nothing to me.I gained a BSc degree in physics from the University of London and my knowledge of physics is probably far superior to the poof Iranian scientists who belabour to build a bomb but can't cause they are so pathetically stupid and have a weak capacity for abstract thought (something you NEED in theoretical physics.) Also,your house prices going up 3-fold is meaningless,cause pretty soon they'll all be vapourised.

[ale91613]

what the fuck you taling about, iran and nukes, you fucking stupid, United States would kick iran's ass anytime, in fact USA woud kick anybody's ass at anytime.

[hamidrezah]

united snakes of aggressors is caught in iraq and afghanistan for 6 years and could not a damn thing about the two.

they also lost in vietnam years ago.

united snakes just lies, if they got balls, they would have attacked Islamuc Republic of Iran long ago.

Stop watching Spy Kids! Kido! looool!

[ale91613]

ok hamidreass. yea we lost on vietnam, and we are still fighting in iraq, but tell me, how come there's never been a fight in our own soil, how about that, not like all them bitches we kick their ass on their own grounds, lol. Is all of you that don't have the balls to get in here, because yall know we would blow the grim outta of you fuck faces.

PS. When iran gets at least half of nukes we have then tell it to come talk business, although i wouldn't think so, their to wuss.

[hamidrezah]

We were not talking in the first place to you yankees. We just don think you are at our level to talk to! You idiots send an envoy last month to talk to us!

You don't come to our soil bcoz things are different here:

1) Our goverment is backed by its people,

2) People are 74 million (>> iraq),

3) We have not been under embargo for 12 years,

4) Our land is not as flat as iraq,

5) We control strait of Hormoz,

6) We have hostages, your soldiers your pig pet zionistan.

Now GFU!

[ale91613]

that's all yall can do, take hostages, why don't u come up straight and fight, u would be leavin home with ur tails between ur legs.

[hamidrezah]

Hey, it is not our fault your dumb presidnet stationed 180,000 of her troops near our border! Get back to your land or face the consequence!

We are not war monger like you. We just develope our nation and go forward, slow and continues. You moda fokas are throwing stones at us.

We will put our 3rd leg in your crack!

[hamidrezah]

Do not fget middle east is our region. Get back to americas.

And if you think world is a jungle and you are allowd to go everywhere and make a mess, wait and see how we do your hole!

[ale91613]

still waiting brother, nothing is gonna ever get close here, so keep dreaming.

[hamidrezah]

Wait till grass grows under your feet (Persian PRoverb).

We have repeatedly said, we aint war monger, but wealso give a crushing response to nay invaders.

So your monkey looking idiotic president and her coward soldiers are going to get a harsh slap if they ever dare to attack Islamic Republic of Iran!

[ale91613]

You are a faggot.

[XboxLIVE09]

dude im american and i say SCREW YOU!

[jamessmedley82]

Can't do that.My girlfriend's going to do the honour when she comes back from the kitchen.

[jmr1068204]

Wow, and we wonder why people are so twisted? We could start with our own forms of entertainment - like stop listening to music about killing people.

[09217566275]

wow the silo was toast!

[semiliteratedgod]

I heard that US nukes are still on fucking hair-trigger, probably Russians are too (not speaking about places like China, Israel or Pakistan)

Accidents could happen anytime...

Just saying.

[Gent100]

Accidents do happen regularly.

The US has had more that 60 accidents with nuclear missiles and bombs (mostly plane crashes, jettisoning of bombs, some lost, often not fully armed etc.) including one (secret)emergency detonation at sea before the US bomber crashed in Canada killing some of the crew who failed to bail out.

[semiliteratedgod]

wow... I didn't know that

[highharmony78]

what is this song called?

[cj2006sd]

The song is "Bodies" by the group, Drowning Pool.

[lesGroves]

"Blackened" would have been a better choice.Drowing Pool? Sorry Im 40 years old.

[Ampex78]

I enjoyed that. Thanks for posting it.

[funkyz007]

yeaaah!!!

[Demolitiondavey]

lmfao

[enders2174]

this is probably the last thing you'll ever see on this earth.

gone in thirty minutes...

[Eclipse13]

nice...but working on dem suck...but i got a chance to see a couple test launches At VANDYLAND...nice video

[svttim]

I found it quite easy to work on

[matalia69]

pity there is no real footage of nukes hitting people it would be coool to see how people burn and are turned into xray dust by our nukes.

[ultimateskinsfan]

HELL YEAH!

[chrisfigaro]

LOLOL

@ 1:54 if you look carefully, there's a little man RUNNING away from the building in the cross hairs!

[chrisfigaro]

Seriously, he runs to the left...i know what he was thinking.

"Ohhh. *****"

[Noubers]

Why does everyone use this stupid song for military videos...

[theprowier]

no kidding

[FordTech1968]

TOTALLY AWESOME!!!!!

I MISS the Cold War! As a child/adult of that era, it was VERY COOL to have lived through and experienced. At least during that period in history, we knew who our emeny was! THE SOVIETS!!!!

EXCELLENT work my man! Nuclear weapons are COOL!

"LMG-30 Minuteman III" BABY!!!!! ;-D

[lyle237]

I thought I saw a lot of Vandenberg clips in there...am I right?

[cj2006sd]

Yes...there is alot of footage from Vandenberg... you are correct!

[upongod]

i think the bigest killer in the world is the guy who accept  ye ill turn the key to lunch it

[Eclipse13]

it takes 4 officer's to launch a MMIII

[svttim]

If I remeber, 2 can do it but there is a time delay at which any two others can stop it, besides, are the SCS keys still installed?

[Eclipse13]

u need two launch votes to launch.. 1 vote from each capsule..( 2 officer's in each capsule)..and only one launch vote can be inhibited...if the missile gets two votes... its gone

[supaxmarine]

exactly

[StingrayZO6427]

Thank god that isn't real...yet.

[pawnman123]

the day after

[LoudS1l3nc3]

nuclear mac?

[tall32guy]

What was the movie from clip at the end was taken from?

[LoudS1l3nc3]

Terminator 3

[ZenRanger94]

Awesome, probably the best missile launch compilation I've seen yet.

[cj2006sd]

Thanks! Im glad you enjoyed it!

whats up w