I really feel that with widescreen were missing out on the feeling of height. Like for example standing besides a skyscraper, or at the edge of a cliff. I think were missing out on taking advantage of visceral human response in many, many situations.
Hi. I have to admit that I might be a bit wrong here. I have watched it in Digital 3D, which I'm pretty sure is 2.35:1. But IMAX movies I believe are in 1.85:1 aspect ratio. I just have never been to IMAX theater (shame on me). Anyway, they don't use the same technology now. They shoot with spherical lenses, but keep the ratio @ 2.35:1 ;)
I somehow missed this long ago, thanks for loading it on YT of course! I was just mentioning Carpenter, having watched my LaserDisc of The Thing recently
He's got two parts from it. I used to buy Widescreen Review magazine on a regular basis, and contributed at Usenet on LD and DVD discussions! This is great for a supporting argument
Wish the restored version of Napoleon that played cinemas around 1990 would be released to DVD. With wide-screen t.v. the three screen scenes wouldn't be shrunken down to stamp size like the home video version was.
Cinemascope is like SUPER HD!
conradojavier 2 weeks ago
Try Playing Xbox in Cinemascope.
conradojavier 2 weeks ago
is this documentary from 1992?
xzaxx 10 months ago
I love CINEMASCOPE!!!!!!
214scifi 1 year ago
cinemascope inside 4:3 inside 16:9...
joldges 1 year ago
I really feel that with widescreen were missing out on the feeling of height. Like for example standing besides a skyscraper, or at the edge of a cliff. I think were missing out on taking advantage of visceral human response in many, many situations.
8Libertine8 1 year ago
Imagine Avatar in scope and 3D, that would probably melt your eyes.
theinsane102 2 years ago
@theinsane102 It IS in Cinemascope format and 3D. Cinemascope is just wide screen in 2.35:1 ratio - a standard format these days.
vdochev 1 year ago
@vdochev Lol, opps, pardon my ignorance.
theinsane102 1 year ago
@theinsane102
Hi. I have to admit that I might be a bit wrong here. I have watched it in Digital 3D, which I'm pretty sure is 2.35:1. But IMAX movies I believe are in 1.85:1 aspect ratio. I just have never been to IMAX theater (shame on me). Anyway, they don't use the same technology now. They shoot with spherical lenses, but keep the ratio @ 2.35:1 ;)
vdochev 1 year ago
I somehow missed this long ago, thanks for loading it on YT of course! I was just mentioning Carpenter, having watched my LaserDisc of The Thing recently
MetallicBill 2 years ago
@MetallicBill
"Panavision makes a low budget film look expensive."
John Carpenter.
agfagaevart 1 year ago
is this video from a DVD or something? - I want to watch the whole thing
bayernstuttgart 2 years ago
He's got two parts from it. I used to buy Widescreen Review magazine on a regular basis, and contributed at Usenet on LD and DVD discussions! This is great for a supporting argument
MetallicBill 2 years ago
Wooow! Thanks a lot for posting this video. It's very interesting.
murifilmpictures 3 years ago 2
Wish the restored version of Napoleon that played cinemas around 1990 would be released to DVD. With wide-screen t.v. the three screen scenes wouldn't be shrunken down to stamp size like the home video version was.
djs1952 3 years ago 6