That's not necessarily true either. It is an excellent choice especially in restoring back teeth because it has superior compressive strength as compared to composite material. What makes composite a better option for the patient is that it is esthetically pleasing, along with the fact that it lacks mercury in its ingredients. From a professional stand point, the advancement in composite bonding technology is what is making it more predictable.
well, malaysia still using it depends on patient`s economic status...
wave012 2 months ago
Modeling the anatomy is much easier if you use a big wescot
SuperMikems 2 months ago
@charlesobama
That's not necessarily true either. It is an excellent choice especially in restoring back teeth because it has superior compressive strength as compared to composite material. What makes composite a better option for the patient is that it is esthetically pleasing, along with the fact that it lacks mercury in its ingredients. From a professional stand point, the advancement in composite bonding technology is what is making it more predictable.
tagzor 1 year ago
@charlesobama
There is no clear evidence in the dental literature that says so. However, most European countries don't use it anymore.
tagzor 1 year ago
yes right> banned in some
but in other still under use especially for educational proposes
thank u for comment>>
38zico 3 years ago
what first??
38zico 3 years ago