True. A post-mortem fema shows the issue was the finish - the lamination came off in LE areas and all 3 of the fins were ripped off. The slight tilt towards the disassembly event is where the upper airframe sheared from an abrupt course change. Sims to 60K, I expect over 50K' AGL for 2011.
Sorry to be a downer, but mach 3.87? Two stage 0 to M flights SOMETIMES break mach 3.5. What is the data on this? Simmed performance? Thanks, great flight.
@danaownsall I hear you. But O 10,000 flights did mach 2.4 or so. P to N (4000) flight hit about 80,000 feet and a hair over mach 3, with severe erosion on the airframe. It doesnt look close to mach 4 in this video. More like 1.5 - 2 tops when it shred. But prove me wrong, where are the data?
Well, that was a surprise. I expected the guy in the foreground to rise up into the sky.
oodoodanoo 8 months ago
True. A post-mortem fema shows the issue was the finish - the lamination came off in LE areas and all 3 of the fins were ripped off. The slight tilt towards the disassembly event is where the upper airframe sheared from an abrupt course change. Sims to 60K, I expect over 50K' AGL for 2011.
jamesfdougherty 1 year ago
@jamesfdougherty what kind of lamination was it?
qzpm150 2 months ago
Sorry to be a downer, but mach 3.87? Two stage 0 to M flights SOMETIMES break mach 3.5. What is the data on this? Simmed performance? Thanks, great flight.
r0ck3tsm0k3 1 year ago
@r0ck3tsm0k3 Its an N5800 minimum diameter. Super high thrust on a rocket that weighs the same as my leg will get it going pretty damn fast
danaownsall 9 months ago
@danaownsall I hear you. But O 10,000 flights did mach 2.4 or so. P to N (4000) flight hit about 80,000 feet and a hair over mach 3, with severe erosion on the airframe. It doesnt look close to mach 4 in this video. More like 1.5 - 2 tops when it shred. But prove me wrong, where are the data?
r0ck3tsm0k3 2 months ago
N5800 C*Star. Nasty. If you're gonna shred, do it at Mach 4. 8^)
jmar1371 1 year ago