Fox Piven calls Glenn Beck Insane and is interrupted by Keith Olbermann

[the1tigglet]

Wow the retarded us just dripping off this page. The rethuglicans bankers met at Jekyll Island to form the reserve, auditing will solve the issue not desolving it, returning the money from the bloated defense fund BACK to the SS and medicare where it belongs is the solution. Being extremist theocrats who cannot spell the word math much less use the concept to do anything will not solve the issues today.

[Geostrategic1]

What a communist old hag.

[sssssjjjj1]

that was funny as hell.

[the1tigglet]

WoW all these commentators who have Ph. D.'s calling this woman anti-american must be very proud of their lives. All of them sitting well on 4-5 star corporations or owning their 19 cars. Hmm must be nice to be so educated and wealthy that they can call a pioneer of civil rights such names. It's also fantastic how they can be totally blind to the facts she points out about the rethuglican party extremists and their funded shows like Fox news.

[texthit]

@the1tigglet ye what a sweet old lady. just said recently she hopes that what is going on in middle east and europe comes here.

[SuperBigblue19]

@the1tigglet LOL why did you waste all day constructing a paragraph that basically says you as a failure are jealous of others successes?

[the1tigglet]

@SuperBigblue19 nope not jealous because if i had to lie about anything to make money then it's not worth it because in the end you can't take the money will you but you can have your dignity. :) ratings does not = right.

[the1tigglet]

fail troll is fail

[Omnicronimous]

@the1tigglet Pioneer of Civil Rights? That couldn't possibly be the Republicans that had been trying to get a Civil Rights Act passed for 40 years, constantly opposed/blocked by Democrats, until finally during Eisenhower's administration the first Civil Rights Act was finally passed and the nut had cracked. Yes. Piven was a Civil Rights pioneer... well after "the right" had been pursuing Civil Rights for decades.

It's amazing how idiots like you can't separate civil rights from socialism.

[the1tigglet]

@Omnicronimous if you knew ANYTHING at all about history you would know that the rolls of the republicans and the democrats were REVERSED during that time period. It wasn't until JFK before the parties switched sides so to speak as the result of the Civil Rights movement being passed so don't quote bs unless you have all the facts. Back then Dems were religious wingnuts bent on putting God into everything and despising science of anykind. today Repiggies hold that torch high.

[Omnicronimous]

@the1tigglet Wrong. The Republican platform and the Democratic platform have each remained consistent on several key issues since the beginning of the 20th Century: Republicans represent small government, fiscal conservatism, a general reluctance to outright opposition to social welfare, and conservative views on the Constitution and its role in American politics. Democrats represent collectivist government, modern American liberalism, and a fluid view on the nature of the Constitutions role.

[the1tigglet]

@Omnicronimous uh no they haven't you have no idea what the hell you are talking about but believe what you want. Their platforms have had a complete shift, the Dems were once the rich interests thus the key reason why the meeting by the large banking interests were held on Jeckyl Island in GA because it was easier for most of the bankers to meet there. You really need to read your history bub you have too many holes in your theories concerning history. Facts are everything and i'm well armed.

[Omnicronimous]

@the1tigglet Lmao. You're refuting all the comments I just made by stating that Democrats met with banks on Jeckyl Island? That's good. Please, by all means, state your enlightening facts. Better yet, refute any single thing I said. Not one comment was theory. It is historical fact. Your meeting between Democrats and bankers on Jeckyl Island does nothing to refute what I said. It relates to the formation of the Federal Reserve, which tied government and banking together.

[Omnicronimous]

@the1tigglet Not all Republicans, but most of them were opposed to the formation of the Federal Reserve. To this day Republicans have voiced the most dissent aimed at the Federal Reserve, which is why Libertarians such as Ron Paul made a home in the Republican Party. Democrats consistently support the Federal Reserve, as well as rely upon it, and Democrats consistently receive the greater share of campaign contributions from big banks year after year. Your "point" proved nothing.

[Omnicronimous]

@the1tigglet Modern socialism took root in the Democratic party even before the Civil War. The case was made by Democrats (the party of slavery) that slavery was a preferable living condition in contrast to the laborer for a large business. To quote Fitzhugh - "Slavery is a form, and the very best form, of socialism." Democrat slavery socialists maintained that the slave and master exchanged industrial value and served each other.

[Omnicronimous]

@the1tigglet This underlying political justification for slavery stuck with the Democratic party. After the Civil War the Democratic Party played a huge role in the development of modern socialism. While Marx played his part in Europe, Democrats did just fine in the U.S. The "Black Vote" was strong with Republicans for many decades following the Civil War. However, long before the '60s the Republicans began losing support. Primarily because they didn't adequately protect blacks from segregation.

[Omnicronimous]

@the1tigglet In the early 1900s, after the Progressive movement had taken shape and gained power at the highest level of government, the message to the black community of selling social welfare communicated from Democrats began to win many of their votes. Woodrow Wilson was able to gain decent support from the black community in his run for President. After taking office however, he instituted segregation on a federal level. In addition he appointed KKK members to office.

[Omnicronimous]

@the1tigglet Even though racism was rampant among Democratic leadership, socialism and the notion of "social justice" had taken root in the black community. A larger chunk of the black vote went in the direction of Democrats with every successive decade. By the time of the '60s, it was nearly split, even though Republicans had been trying to abolish segregation and pass a Civil Rights Act for decades and had been blocked by Democrats. How was this done?

[Omnicronimous]

@the1tigglet To quote Margaret Sanger: "We should hire three or four colored ministers, perferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea of it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."

[Omnicronimous]

@the1tigglet Democrats promised social engineering programs that would "benefit" the black community as a bribe to specific black political leaders. They went out of their way to cater to specific black organizations that were otherwise fringe groups, especially socialist in nature. Democrats won the day in the '60s as far as elections went. Lyndon Johnson, who was a widely known racist, became President. Outwardly socialist programs were put through under the premise of aiding blacks.

[Omnicronimous]

@the1tigglet Behind closed doors Johnson consistently said things like, "Son, when I appoint a nigger to the court, I want everyone to know he's a nigger.". The same party that in the '50s was loaded with racists, KKK members, had advocated slavery, had turned socialist in nature, had instantly transformed into the party of "black power" following the first Civil Rights Act passed by Republicans under Eisenhower? Hardly. The truth is that black political leadership was BOUGHT!

[Omnicronimous]

@the1tigglet For the last 40 years the Black vote has shifted to and stuck with Democrats because black political leadership is constantly bribed into the Democrat fold. Meanwhile any dissent among black political leadership that goes against "social justice" socialism is branded a "house negro", "Uncle Tom", and "Oreo". The Republicans have remained consistently opposed to socialism for over 100 years. Their reward for this consistency is a modern liberal dialogue that brands them racist for it

[pythagerus123]

People will march again, but you have to take away their welfare first.

[JohnnyMac2237]

Fox Piven the Anti American now on MSBBC GE Propaganda

[L8RDazdudes]

Dangerous times.. Ya because the left will go bannannas and start shooting at point blank range at us like in Tucson. He was LEFT folks.

[TheNavigateur]

Haha, great editing... thanks for this :)

[landsdown44]

Someone is playing with Final Cut Pro or other software.

[mellowdco]

whoa! that came from out of left field

[philzway]

@mellowdco Heh, heh, heh, "left" field.  I get it. :^)