*For example, if I were for some hypothetical reason kidnapped by Communists, tortured and held in some dungeon somewhere and happened to be held in the same cell as Blacks, also subject to the same conditions, of course naturally I would attempt to make some kind of an alliance with them in an effort to escape or to avoid further harm somehow, even if the Communists in question happened to be White.
That's not being "pro-White", that's just being pro-Self...
- I don't value being "pro-White" as an ultimate standard of value in itself, as LR wrongly implies! I see pro-Whiteness as being advantageous to me preservatively for the most part, just as I see my own liberty being advantageous to me for the most part, just as I see the destruction of *some* other people's liberties as being advantageous at *certain* times for the most part, not just to me but to many others whom also invest value in my racial community & the civilization that it sustains!
Aha! So you decided to brake your own little 'treaty' then! SUCH irony! I knew you couldn't take the provocation! lol
No not the whole video, just the part about "rape camps" which you neglected to present in full context again, which btw my teenaged Serbian wife completely agrees on. - In fact by her standards, I am somewhat of a moderate by comparison..
(You'd be surprised at how many Europeans actually want the death penalty back for homosexuality.)
What exactly is the moral difference (if any), between conscriptive procreation facilities for birthdeniers, who contribute to the population collapse of a particular society by witholding births from the racial community of that society, in the midst of a reproduction crisis and the routine consumption of sugar cookies by someone suffering from severe and extreme glycine deficieny? - The same could be said of chemotherapy in relation to the spread of a malignant cancer.
@EuropeanWatchman You're a liar. You said you'd stop spewing your advocacy of compulsory reproduction on my pages. I guess blocking you is the only way to keep you honest.
You're a hopeless idealist and a hypocrite, who yearns for a way of life that died out more than 150 years ago!
On the contrary! I said that I would "refrain from expressing my political opinions on your video comments area", not only did you affirm a completely different option to this one and not only is clarifying my ethical views a different thing entirely from stating my political opinions, but you broke that pact by contacting me yourself!
@EuropeanBroadcasts I never had any treaty or pact with you. I've always reserved the right to block people, though I have generally refrained from doing so. I don't have time for drama or to address particular details of your normative views any further. I reject authoritarian politics and anti-individualistic ethics, and that's that.
Says the guy who routinely makes videos on the subject of commercial brand names...
("Agreement, treaty, pact, understanding" - it's the same thing and you know it. "Drama!" Ha! With you it's more like a comedy! Why do I need to be told that you have "the right" to block people? What do you think I'm going to do?! Wave a magic wand in the air and zap you through your computer screen?! lol)
You already accept authoritarian politics through your advocacy of a military establishment & a criminal justice system! - No! What YOU reject is 'long term realism!' What YOU idealise is an impossibly long term, totally static position on the political spectrum! This is not AMERICA! This is EUROPE! WE, are not just going to let a few million deluded whores from ONE single generation destroy our entire Civilization, because of YOUR disneyland ideals!
The liberties of whores who stand in the way of our survival must crushed underfoot! Their human dignity must be twisted out of all recognition, to dehumanize both them AND their ideas! - Not only will we drive out all the non-Whites down the barrel of a gun, but we will hunt down & systematically exterminate ALL CM's under proscriptive legislative orders, like the Republican Commander Sulla!
You wouldn’t put a cancer cell on trial, so why try them?!
I can only assume that you have blocked my other account because you know that you HAVE no real answers to my very reasonable questions, as well as many of the other very reasonable questions and counter-arguments which you appear to have absolutely no intellectual capacity to address whatsoever and have therefore opted for censorship as the only recourse!
LOL! I'm sorry, but I really can't help but intervene here! - LR has got it all wrong! (& perhaps willfuly so...) My ultimate standard of value isn't being "pro-White!" My ultimate standard of value is my own unapologetic self-preservation, both organically within my own lifetime as an independent organism & genetically beyond that lifetime & by extension the self-presevation of the most viable mechanism through which I think that can be achieved; my racial community & its civilizational basis.
I agree with this video, speaking as a pro-white and anti-nazi. The countries that defeated fascism were not multiculturalist. It is not a choice between one or the other. I suspect virtually every educated person was a race-realist before political correctness inverted common sense. Settled and indigenous peoples have rights to their homelands, whites included. Race does not trump freedom, nor has the state any right to encourage or forbid race mixing.
@"The British-Israel agitation had a disastrous consequence.Men like Cecil Rhodes and Lord Milner were too intelligent, of course,to take the genealogical drivel seriously,but they were so gullible that they did believe in a permanent alliance between Great Britain&J*wry.That sealed the doom of Britain,for the J*ws,with their fixed and instinctive policy of "first defile,and then destroy,"naturally ruin first the nations,such as Germany&Britain,that were most hospitable to them."RPO
@rahotep101 Indeed. The idea that Nazism need be embraced to eliminate multiculturalism is absurd. Multiculturalism -- a non-populist doctrine favoured by elites rather than the people -- is another aspect of social engineering (SE). SE is another aspect of statism, of a multi-tentacled mega-government that is readily able to implement deficit budgets to fund its SE efforts.
@DIEversity203 I'm not arguing for a stateless society. Rather I am advocating a small state that is principally concerned with protecting private property and personal liberty.
I believe humanity is better by the presence of white people. Do you agree? What part of humanity do you think we can and maybe should do without. We adopt causes such as save the whales, dolphins because the world is better with them. Why not a better world by saving white children?
AFRICA FOR AFRICANS, ASIA FOR ASIANS AND WHITE COUNTRIES IS OBVIOUS. It shows the white genocide going on in all white countries. HELP US STOP WHITE GENOCIDE. Why is that not a desirable goal?
'The Germans noble character was repressed under totalitarian national socialism'
They were ahead of most other nations technologically by about 20 years....I mean you could even argue that we would not be in space without National Socialism.
@ChurchillWorePanties, I know, they were having babies like crazy and had the highest per capita income of any nation in modern history. Hardly repressed
The highest income per capita was not real wealth. A lot of their economy was fake and was living off borrowed money. They borrowed tons of money from countries like the Netherlands and many others that they later invaded. Their economy would not have sustained but collapsed like the Soviet's massive statist economy did that had great productivity at first.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, lol, this is your best tale yet. Really man, don't be so obvious, have some couth.
Germany's economy was successfull, despite a world wide jooish boycott, because they excised their Parasite and organized their labor. Germany relies on her imports of grain to live and her exports of precision technology and heavy machinery to pay for that grain. Holland was suffering in the Depression like GB and USA so I don't see how they loaned Germany much ...
The problem is you don't know the economics or the history of Nazi Germany. You don't have any specific numbers or stats, just assertions as well as neo nazi propaganda. Government income had been 10 billion Reichsmarks in 1928. In 1939, it stood at 15 billion. However, government spending had increased from 12 billion Reichsmarks in 1928 to over 30 billion in 1939 - a difference of 15 billion Reichsmarks. That increase in spending was funding by borrowing.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, no, the problem is that you are trying to justify Great Britain's alliance with international j*wry, both zionists and communists, against the cultural and militray heart of Europe ie Germany(Austria), Italy, Hungary, Vichy France etc.
Hitler virtually eliminated German unemployment and gave Germans the highest standard of living and self-respect they had yet enjoyed while Roosevelt's "Joo Deal" was hampering growth and starving Americans.
France was not pro Nazi and a majority of Austrians didn't want to join Nazism so the Nazis invaded a held a Soviet style vote. Funny that Nazi puppet governments with occupying Nazi troops are considered the true countries by you. You keep bring up jews with no documentation or anything again as your dogmatic, non sourced political hammer. You in reality justify a dozen European countries being invaded by Nazis. I am not a fan of Roosevelt or the New Deal.
I could borrow 4x my income, purchase cultural icons, have more materials etc but eventually I have to pay it back and to even continue in the meantime I would have to borrow more from the same group or find someone else to fund my excesses that didn't match my productivity. That is what Nazi Germany was doing. You confused borrowed money as real wealth when in fact Nazi Germany would have collapsed just like the Soviets. Nazis spent over double what they took in.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, wrong, National Socialist Germany was successfull economically because they produced food and goods for domestic consumption.They had to import some raw materials such as iron ore from Sweden and grain from abroad. To pay for this they exported precision technological machinery/equipment,just like they do today.
The soviet union "fell" to make it look like communism had been defeated while Clinton and Blair implemented marxist policies in the West
@DIEversity203 "The soviet union "fell" to make it look like communism had been defeated while Clinton and Blair implemented marxist policies in the West" Thats is nonsense. Centrally planned economies do not work. Read Hayek and Mises critiques of socialism and communism. The Austrian school predicted the failure of centrally planned economies. Also the idea of "Marxist policies" is suspect in that Marx wrote nothing of policy and 95% of his work is a critique of capitalism
@PiotrThePrimate, you obtuse mattoid. Clinton and Blair were both for open borders, both pandered to non-whites, both cozied up to China, Clinton bombed nationalist, Christian Serbia in support of communist, muslim Albanians, they both shipped manufacturing jobs to the third world and implemented "hate crime" legislation, among other treasonous and MARXIAN 'things', did Marx ever talk about 'things'?
Capitalism and Communism are two sides of the same shekel, hence WW2....
@DIEversity203 No, Marx never anticipated the deindustrialisation of the Anglo-sphere and Europe and the shifting of manufacturing to China and the concurrent conversion of China to capitalism. Marx predicted that capitalism would fail because of failing rates of profit over successive business cycles, and that doesn't appear to have happened. Relax, take it easy with the insults. You appear to be economically illiterate but I am not beating you over the head with that. Chill.
@DIEversity203 Keep your anger. There is no need for the insults, they only lower the quality of the discussion and don't have any persuasive power. Stay angry but argue your point with reference to sound argument and evidence and dispense with the insults.
I just do not see how serious people can say that Churchill was right in allying Great Britain with international bolshevism to defeat nationalist Germany and her allies; especially since the advent of the internet which has brought information to us that was once suppressed or only available to serious scholars and researchers.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, wrong again, cromwell, the majority of Austrians DID support anschluss, hence the millions of Austrians greeting Hitler. If so many Austrians were against re-unificatiuon then why didn't someone shoot Hitler? He rode around in an open air Mercedes and was surrounded by huge crowds. Schussnig wouldn't allow Austrians to vote for anschluss, only against it.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, it's funny how you only acknowledge capitalist/communist puppet states, occupied by allied troops as legitimate governments.
"You keep bringing up the joos, blah blah"... Have you ever heard of the BALFOUR DECLARATION? How about the British-Israel Movement? How about the fact that the Brits and Americans deliberately lied at Nuremburg about joos being turned into soap, lampshades, electricuted on a wet floor in auschwitz(the story b4 the gas chambers)
@AnglosphereAlIiance " a majority of Austrians didn't want to join Nazism so the Nazis invaded a held a Soviet style vote." Yeah we heard that line already. again the fact is Austrians voted in favor of joining Germany one simply needs to see the heroes welcome the Austrians gave Germany.
The future is important and understanding the past is important as well. A lot of the western nationalist movement (maybe a quarter to half who knows) are just pro nazi and will make any excuse of the white invasion of Nazi Germany who started the war. They are bad for the movement for a variety of reasons but I think the most important are
1. They are ahistorical-They make up facts and stats with no sources
@AnglosphereAlIiance, 1. how am I making up facts by stating that the minorities within Czechslovakia wanted independence like the Slovaks, or to rejoin with their mother countries, in the case of the Poles, Hungarians, Germans, etc for the 20th time?! Look at the land successions and see all the countries that annexed areas of Czechslovakia because of the Munich Conference you anti-white moron.
2. Your parroting back the party line is an effrontery to the public, lemming
It is funny that you defend separation and nationalism for ethnic minorities in the successful nation of Czechoslovakia (in favor of Nazi Germany) but then are completely fine with the Nazi invasion and occupation of a dozen white countries, many that were neutral, all in the name of a "united" (occupied) Europe. I know of Hungary and Poland's actions after Nazi invasion. That isn't a source that a majority in those areas wanted it, but geopolitical action by governments.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, really, are you that stupid, seriously man, you are like a block wall in the road of reason. Why do you think there is no Czechslovakia today? Huh?! WHY? Because after communism had forced Czechs, Slovaks and others to live under the same government for 50 the people opted for INDEPENDENCE, just like they did when DEMOCRACY had forced them to live under the same government after WW1 you fool. By do you keep beating your weakest point, lemmingwitz?
I am WAITING for the evidence/SOURCES that a majority in Czechoslovakia or a majority of the minorities in that country wanted a NAZI INVASION/OCCUPATION of their country and wanted to break away from the most successful country in central/eastern Europe in right wing capitalist 1938 Czechoslovakia, not the failed later Soviet occupied communist Czechoslovakia.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, where are your sources that Father Josef Tiso, a Catholic priest and Slovak nationalist wasn't the voice for Slovak nationalists and became their leader in the independent Slovak Republic? POLAND ANNEXED TERRITORY FROM CZECHSLOVAKIA, HUNGARY ANNEXED TERRITORY FROM CZECHSLOVAKIA, ROMANIA ANNEXD TERRITORY FROM CZECHSLOVAKIA ETC! MY PROOF...?, LOOK UP A MAP OF THE PARTITION YOU IMBECILE!
Again more assertions and smokescreens. NO STATS NO FIGURES JUST ASSERTIONS. You don't know the difference between geo political action by states and the people within the country that the action is being taken against. WHAT ARE THE STATS/FIGURES OF THIS PRO NAZI MAJORITY IN CZECH oF ETHNIC MINORITIES WANTING A NAZI INVASION AND OTHER ANNEXATIONS? Are do you we just have more assertions and asking to prove a negative. Maybe something about Jews?
But you are mostly a national socialist. That is the truth! LOL. They would be right to call you a Nazi. A communist could say Berlin was the capital of Germany and they would be right about that but wrong about their positions. They are not anti racists just like you are not pro white. You are pro nazi/sympathetic to Nazi invasions of white nations as well as failed Nazi economics, they are anti white.
@Anglosphere, you are pro-zionist/communist and thereby a proponent of our present situation because you are defending the Churchill/Rosenfeld cabal that prohibited Germany, Hungary, Italy, Slovakia, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Finland, Croatia, Romania, Bulgaria, Vichy France and numerous volunteers from Belgium, Holland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Spain and Portugal from defeating communism and keeping joos out of our lands.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, 3. the US/UK was anti-German, Austrian, Vichy French, Italian, Romanian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Estonian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Finnish, Bulgarian, Slovak and the countless volunteers from Denmark, Belgium, Norway, Spain, Sweden....not to mention anti-NATIONALIST and pro-ONE WORLD
They were not anti German, just anti German domination of Europe. Vichy France was opposed by most French and the leader was imprisoned after the war was over by the French people. Italy declared war on the allies in support of Germany's white invasion. The balken's the British were not anti or pro. Denmark, Belgium, Norway, etc JOINED the allies after NAZI INVASION. Germany invaded Yugoslavia and Greece as well and was anti slav.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, once again, please refer back to my last comment for my reply to your incessant need to repeat your fictitous account of history and your schizophrenic grasp of the present.
But you don't know history. You have already proven it about the Russian revolution and the West's reaction, the Nazi invasion of Austria before the vote that would reject uniting with Nazi Germany that ended with a Nazi military coup de tat soviet style vote, the Danish royal guard's resistance to the Nazi invasion, the MIXING UP of communist Czech with 1938 Czech, geo politicial states with majorities, Nazi puppet governments with majorities, etc.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, you are right, I have never heard of the "history" that you speak of because it is part of your indoctrination to be a means of your own destruction.
The problem is you just have neo nazi propaganda and assertions along with history that you have even admitted you got wrong. I have sources, states, and figures as well as the history of what those countries did and the white treason of Nazi Germany's European invasion and back door dealings with the Soviets against the right wing governments in Eastern Europe along with siding with radical Muslims.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, no, once again the problem is that you are parrotting mainstream zionist myths and soviet war propaganda and calling it "history".
I have already answered your delusions about WW2 in previous comments, at this time I would ask you to refer to them. Thank you and Merry Christmas
I love how you keep ignoring how the actual free vote in Austria was predicted to reject unification with Nazi Germany so the Nazis invaded and held a Soviet style vote that magically made it pass after Nazis occupation with 90%! As for the Czechs still no evidence a majority of the minorities wanted a break up of the country and a Nazi invasion. As for the US/Nazi ships if it is true I will take back US declaring war since i am not blinded like you. PM evidence
@AnglosphereAlIiance, you are one thick-headed lemming. I believe your ultimate destination is the abyss over the cliff despite all my efforts at reasoning with you. Schussnig wouldn't allow Austrians to vote for anschluss, only against it. Did the Irish and Scotts cheer the British brigands and line the streets with flowers for them?
Once again with the Czechslovakia issue, please refer to my last 20 replies to you about it you history channel tool.
@DIEversity203 It is actually you that is the "thick-headed lemming" in that you and your ilk are presenting Europeans a false dichotomy of multicultralism vs. national socialism i.e. two unattreactive options. Anyone that wants to live under a fascistic regime, having all aspects of their life directed by an all-powerful State is definitive of a "lemming" -- a mindless, obeient drone waiting for its next instructions. Most people find all forms of totalitarianism repulsive.
@PiotrThePrimate " having all aspects of their life directed by an all-powerful State is definitive" Hmm, seems the very a-typical and incorrect idea of what National Socialism is as is told to us by the jewish media.The reality is very different and beautiful. One cannot argue that under National Socialism the Germans were unhappy. I wonder, what is the libertarian/liberal democratic answer to the nightmare the west is now in?
@ssszar "what is the libertarian/liberal democratic answer to the nightmare the west is now in?" (1) Eliminate central banking; (2) return to the gold standard; (3) run balanced budgets; (4) shrink the state and its bureacracy by eliminating all aspects of social engineering and intrusion into the private sphere; (5) employ the military strictly for defensive purposes (6) return to/adopt constitutionalism and republicanism.
@PiotrThePrimate Spoken like a true capitalist, the ideas you brought up only address our economic issues and re not very adequate. Basically they are the ideas of a dying system. Just as the the wiemar republic, they fail to actually address the issues at the core of our problems we have today. The problems we face today, are at its core, racial problems and until that is addressed, all this talk of republicanism [which got us into this mess] is useless nonsense.
@ssszar Economic strength and stability are prerequisites for further action. What I am proposing is necessary but certainly not sufficient -- that I concede. It is the USAs slow move away from republicanism and towards democracy that has enabled many of the problems that the USA is now facing. The racial problems can be better addressed from a position of economic and governmental strength.
@PiotrThePrimate, I guess thats why the overwhelming majority of Germans enjoyed more freedom than they had under the Kaiser, the Weimar Republic or the occupied "republic" that they are today.
The fact is that international capitalists Great Britain and the United States allied themselves with international communist Soviet Union to destroy Nationalist Germany, Nationalist Hungary, Nationalist Italy, Nationalist Slovak Rep, Nationalist Romania, Nationalist Estonia, etc.
@PiotrThePrimate, you can simply look at the suicide numbers before 1933 in Germany, under democracy and after 1933 under evil totalitarian NATIONAL socialism, not fascism....
Actually the British and French refused to join the Soviets in wanting to stop the Nazi invasion of Czechoslovakia. It was the Nazis who made a NAP and agreed to split Poland with the Soviets so the Nazis could fight the French and British. The Nazis additionally failed to beat the Soviets and handed Eastern Europe to them making the Anglosphere having to stop the spread of communism later. The Nazis invaded a dozen white countries. They are anti white.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, great Britain bombed the most beautiful cultural centers in Europe and turned half of Europe over to jooish bolshevism. Churchill and his punks were anti-white and pro-zionism and so are you.
Are you confused? The Nazis lost the war and handed Eastern Europe over to the communists. The Allies couldn't take it all back at that time. It wasn't an "agreement" like the agreement of the NAP and splitting of Poland to the Soviets to fight the West, it was a recongization of the reality of the consequences of Nazi failure and the Cold War that did end in Western success. It was the Germans too who released Lenin the bolshevik you fool into Russia! lol
@AnglosphereAlIiance, huh, so the "nazis" handed Eastern Europe over to the soviets by backing the various people's of those nations and allying with them against the soviets, really? The Brits and Americans arming and feeding the bolshevik nun rapers and chucrh burners were not responsible for turning Europe over to communism? Huh, that's some interesting logic there, Cromwell.
The British and American governments did not fund the bolsheviks and only after the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union did they give them aid. Nazi Germany by the way declared war against the US not the other way around. The Nazis allied with a few central eastern European countries. The other half they invaded like Yugoslavia, Greece, Poland, Austria, Czechoslovakia, etc.They then failed to beat the Soviets and left the Anglosphere 50 yearsto deal with the Soviets.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, Roosenfeld had ordered American ships to fire on German merchant ships and U-boats starting in 1940. According to most, that in itself was an act of war.
@DIEversity203 You can't get through to the anglosphere with reality. They have Stockholm syndrome in a resistant form that could more properly be called "London syndrome' at this point. The anglosphere is dead. The British empire is dead. The brits sacrificed it for the commies at the direction of the yehuds. Churchill instigated the war at all costs to save yehudery. America went along with it and is also paying for it. GB now only exports fraud and harbors financial criminals.
@DeltaNordicAdvance, yes, I came to the same conclusion days ago yet I find it amusing to destroy his illusions about the allies somehow fighting a just holy war against "evil nazis" to make the world safe for "democracy" and to put the Germans back under the usury of "God's Chosen Race".
I don't agree with a great deal of the English as well as later British actions in Ireland as I have said. I am not like you that always makes excuses for anti white invasions and occupations. For instance, I wish Gladstone's wish to make Ireland a free white dominion much earlier would have been adopted instead of the problems that presided later because of it.
@ChurchillWorePanties Yes sir. Being anti US/UK/Israel alliance (he forgot that one , conveniently) is the only sane approach in light of the state of that alliance and the legacy of ruin that it has left in Europe and the deteriorating 'anglosphere'.
@ThingsComeUp, thank you brother. I feel the same way towards LibertarianRealist, and even Anglosphere despite my German and Irish heritage. I just wish white people who are awakened to what's going wouldn't be inadvertent conveyors of anti-German propaganda. Saying that Lebensborn were "rape camps" and that Germany was solely responsible for WW2 and therefore our present multi-cultural proletarian paradise only serves the purpose of the joos and their lackeys.
An excellent video. To be racially conscious is not some kind of aberration, as the left maintain, but the natural default position of nearly all human beings. The Cambridge academic, George Steiner, argues that racial consciousness is part of our biological heritage, an evolutionary survival strategy. To want 'your group' to survive and be in charge of its own affairs is only natural.
@ThingsComeUp, nobody is bowing to Hitler. I do not worship him and I think he made many mistakes but he was far more of a "white nationalist" than Roosenfeld, Churchill or Stalin.
I can't believe how many people continue to propagate jooish myths about the ONE man in modern history who freed his nation from joos and communism.
I don't even talk about him unless someone makes outrageous claims like the Lebensborn camps were "rape camps"....
Actually we are responding with history and white treason committed by uncle adolf. Not your beloved talking points about "jewish myths" that you so much enjoying propelling your ideology on since it has little else to be based on.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, I think Churchill and his zionism was the real "white treason".
I hope they wipe your arse with a copy of the Balfour Declaration after you are made an invalid from reaping the multi-cultural benefits of Mr Churchill's actions.
Supporting Israel is not that big of deal. It has bad foreign policy problems and I don't think they should be a top priority at all unless someone can make the case they are vital to our national security. However, just supporting or allowing a Jewish state is not a big deal. What is worse is invading white countries supporting Muslims against white rule in the Middle East and making NAPs/ splitting Poland with communists and then losing the war handing EE over
Luckily the Anglosphere beat the Nazis and the USSR and they are both in the ash bin of history. We have the immigration and MultiKULT problem that took effect in laws in the 1960s but we can look to our past of white rule to combat the latest fad. Jewish influence questions are legitimate as is questing supporting Israel but it is not a valid political hammer. NAPS/splitting Poland w/ communists, losing to USSR/ siding with Muslims over white rule was Nazi Germany.
@DIEversity203 Exactly, Even Pat Buchanan, no friend of 'nazis', wrote a convincing book that blamed Churchill, not Hitler, for failures of tactic and diplomacy in WWII. Hitler had a plan that would have allowed GB to keep the empire, and to make Germany alone responsible for repelling the Soviets. Instead, the drunk madman Winston attacked Germany, allowed the Soviets to win. GB firebombed Dresden AND lost its empire. As a result the UK has 10x GDP in debt and full on multicult.
@DeltaNordicAdvance, yes I know, David Irving's "Churchill's War" says the exact same thing. You can't explain that to utopian libertarians though....
Do you keep forgetting that Churchill Was not PM until about 5 months after Western Europe was at war with Nazi Germany? As for the rest I have been over it with you several times.
Nobody is trying to make Japan white though, and even if they were it's hard to see how any Japanese person would agree with it. Being pro-white in Europe is totally different from being pro-white in Japan. It's white countries (and really, only white countries) that are having their demographics engineered the most dramatically. The crazy thing is that people actually think this is a good thing and push for it. The non-white immigrants probably don't care what happens to white people either.
When Ghandi stands up for Indian people, anti-racists call him a hero, When Mandela stands up for black people, anti-racists call him a hero, but when I stand up for White people, anti-racists call me a Naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. Anti-racist is code-word for anti-White.
I think I will say it again, just because the more I say it, the more it makes sense:
Multicultural societies need more laws.
That is just a simple truth. Think about it.
If nobody has loyalty to anyone except the abstract religion of Political Correctness (which nobody really likes, by the way), there will be more crime.
Multiculturalism creates disorder.
I will say it again: Multiculturalism creates disorder.
I know this may be hard for you which I find scary because I didn't think you were a nut. One can actually debate and talk about more than one topic! I think it is anti white to invade a dozen white countries when many were neutral and many were right wing governments. I find it very disturbing of you to try to shut down debate and calling debate about Nazi Germany anti white. Are you just a supporter of Nazi Germany and don't want any debate?
So White Rabbit you think history shouldn't be discussed? Do you think supporting Nazi Germany is a good PR move like the Mantra? Why are you attacking my side of the two way debate instead of both of us if for some strange reason you think debate is bad? The truth is all white European countries have a history of pro white policies and the Nazis are not the best to point to and are bad PR. Neo Nazism is a stain on the message.
"So White Rabbit you think history shouldn't be discussed?"
No,I think the attempt to turn all white countries brown that is HAPPENING RIGHT NOW is a much more important topic to be trying to reach our fellow white citizens with.
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree I am a >>>>>>>naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews<<<<<<<
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Thanks buddy but I don't support non white immigration into the West already. I view it as a negative economic, ideological, and sociological turn for the West to continue it. Try using your mantra against someone it would apply to instead of trying to shut down the debate about the anti white policies of Nazi Germany.
I have listened to him on World War II and I don't agree with everything that is said in the video I favored. He is dead wrong on his oversimplified explanation on WWII and its incorrect, non-sourced presumptions with no relevant statistics or comparisons.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, Hitler's weakness was his love for the British. He thought that British patriots would call on their racial consciousness and ally with Germany instead of allying with the enemies of Europe to destroy it's very soul....
If his passages about the British in 'Mein Kampf' are not enough proof then how about letting the Brits paddle back to Britain from Dunkirk and then sending Rudolf Hess to Britain to try and make peace and save our race!
Oh my gosh come on. Enough with this crap. In 1939 white countries ruled the world! The only other non white major power was Japan but they were not even in the top three. There were no powerful non white enemies that could military conquer the Anglosphere, Germany, France, or even the nasty Soviets. Again Hitler's invasion and occupation of all of those white countries violated the balance of power in Europe and weakened Britain relatively in the world.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, again, Britain's declaration of war against Germany and not the Bolsheviks weakened Britain and decimated Europe! How would a strong Germany weaken Britain? Please tell me!
Because the balance of power in Europe is ended and Germany can in the future threaten the British isles if conflict ever arose and there would be little allies within Europe that Britain could team up with against future German expansion in Europe. Germany is the one that made a non aggression pact with the Soviets to split Poland because he knew it was likely the invasion of Poland would infuriate the French and British (to keep a balance of power).
@AnglosphereAlIiance, why on earth would Hitler have wanted to ruin the British Empire, which spread the reign of the white man across the world? Once again, Hitler had nothing but praise and love for Britain. Churchill sold off Britain's possessions to Wall Street to fight Germany! Did that strengthen Britain?
Hitler is not a god. He would not live forever. Relations could sour in the future and the foreseeable future has to be taken into consideration in international relations. Britain gains nothing with Germany dominating continental Europe while getting to keep the Empire they already had which Nazi Germany couldn't take with its worse navy. It weakens Britain relatively and worries France, Britain's closet ally about their old adversity's power gain.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, the proper name was National Socialist Germany, you sound like a lemming reciting a New York's Times article to me.
You are absolutely correct. Europe needs to be weak and "balanced" so they can not organzie a formidable defense against their enemies. Once again, thank you for acknowledging that Great Britain and her Joos have played the greatest role in weakening Europe. Playing German states against eachother, even during the Seige of Vienna!
@WhiteRabbitRadioFTW If you don't want to be called a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews, then don't associate yourself with nazi ideology. Nazism was a cult of conformity not befitting a population of free-thinking white people. The Germans were and are a great people, but their noble character was repressed under totalitarian national socialism. Pro-Nazi is a code word for anti-freedom.
Oh you mean when because France and Britain refused to help the Soviets initially against the Germans like Stalin wanted to after Munich? They really were wanting a war with the Germans weren't they? So much so that Hitler made a non aggression pact with the Soviets to split Poland so he could fight the French and British as he weakened the right wing governments in Eastern and central Europe by invading them! Sounds like a great solution!
@AnglosphereAlIiance, Hitler did everything he could to work out a deal with Poland, they were a valuable buffer state between Germany and Russia afterall. However when he saw that the Brits, French and Americans were telling Poland not to negotiate, and when the commies in Poland stepped up their massacres of Germans, Hitler made a deal with the devil to save the Germans in occupied Prussia.He never thought the Brits and French would do what they did.
Did you see what happened to those who tried to negotiate and gave an inch? Like the Austrian releasing Nazi prisoners or the Czechs giving up some of their land to the Germans at the request of France and Britain? Just how did that turn out for them? Invasion and occupation. That would be bat shit to continue appeasing Hitler when he would just invade anyway. Poland was controlled by a right wing government. The communists had practically no power in Poland
Yeah whatever why don't you just go quote the mantra again somewhere? I thought you were more intelligent and thoughtful then this. I will not rally behind any statement or belief that is completely false and that includes the mulitKULT and nazism.
Yes I agree the Germans have done a lot for Europeans in many areas. They are by far a net positive. However, like you said the Germans existed for 99% of their time outside of Nazism. Imperial Germany had some good aspects though I don't agree with everything but it was certainly better than Nazi Germany.
@LibertarianRealist Nazi is a code word for anti-freedom? What freedoms did the Germans under Hitler not have? To say the noble character of the Germans was oppressed by the Nazis. was that noble character not oppressed under the wiemar republic? I think you may be making the mistake of equating National Socialism with jewish marxist socialism.
You mean the Anglopshere? The one that expanded white influence in the Americas, Australia, and Africa lol? And the Nazis who weakened white countries in Europe? And you call me anti white? LOL Do you have to be a support of Nazi invasions of white countries to be pro white?
@AnglosphereAlIiance, yeah all those British soldiers who died building an empire just to have it given away after WW2 by Winnie the Jooh(lover); and then to bring the angry natives of those colonial possesions to Our European homelands to rob, beat, rape and murder us all while we fund it with our taxes. Hail Freedumb!
Yes Nazi Germany's invasion of the most white countries of any side in the war by 5 fold and its losing eastern Europe to the Soviets because they couldn't beat them had very bad consequences for the weakening of the West. The British and Americans made mistakes as well like in Zimbabwe, South Africa, and some aspects of decolonization. I don't defend every act of England or Britain but its entire history before 1945 involves less white treason than the Nazis.
@AnglosphereAlIiance, almost all of the European nations were allied with Germany, or neutral trading partners with her. So much for Britain being a champion of small nations, like Ireland huh?
The Brits were allied with extra-European powers, queerbait
Are you crazy? Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Netherlands, France, Britain, etc were part of the allies! Almost all of Northern and Western Europe was with Allies or was neutral!
@AnglosphereAlIiance, Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Finland, Slovakia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Italy, Vichy France and Hungary were all part of the Axis. Spain and Portugal were pro-Axis and Sweden and Switzerland were neutral and did much trading with Germany. Plus thousands of volunteers from Holland, Belgium, France, Denamrk, Norway and Sweden joined the Waffen-SS. The last two divisions fighting in Berlin were the Norwegian "Nordland" and French "Charlemagne"
"Anti white? That mantra doesn't apply to me silly "
I suspect you are a false-flag anti-white desperate to shift attention away from white genocide by droning on and on about the Ze evil Nazis when we`re in the middle of a global program of white genocide.
Because it is a PR KILLER and for good reason! So many identify with that neo nazism. And not it is not all I have focused on. You can take a look at my videos on this channel and my other one. NOT one has been about WWII but my next one will be.
@182511419139208, and you are a neo-zionist poo-poo head oooooh, I too can throw around meaningless media terms that fail to address any of the FACTS that I have presented.
@182511419139208, you are right. I need to let you assholes continue to propagate the jooish lies about my grandfather unmolested. We don't get enough of "evil nazi" talk on the talmudvision, at the public indoctrination center or from hollywood, do we?
You are acting very spoiled. Just like orthodox leftist anti whites talk about the evils of whites and the euro centric dominated society as a political hammer against criticizing their myths about imperialism, the crusades, etc you use Jews and some bad arguments against Nazi Germany as your hammer against us when we are even directly talking about them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
@DIEversity103 I doubt your grandfather was a Nazi. If he was he was probably a fuck up who was always on disciplinary duty cleaning the shitters at the barracks.
@182511419139208, my Opa was only 10 when the war ended but his oldest brother fought his way through Poland, France and then through Russia, survived Stalingrad and 10 years in the gulags.
I bet your grandfather was one of the cowards dropping bombs on Dresden, bragging about it in his local pub to this day while it isn't even safe for him to walk home at night.
The so-called "anti-racist" Establishment that you anti-whites support has been invading and messing up many more non-white countries,as well as trying to turn all white countries brown (GENOCIDE).
Everything Hitler said abut the jews,you anti-white say about white people.
If nobody has loyalty to anyone except the abstract religion of Political Correctness (which nobody really likes, by the way), there will be more crime.
Multiculturalism creates disorder.
I will say it again: Multiculturalism creates disorder.
If you insist White people are not allowed to have their own countries and self determination like non-Whites have in non-White countries, you are an anti-White.
Taking care of a nations genetic infrastructure. That is a brilliant thought.
anywayokey 1 week ago
*For example, if I were for some hypothetical reason kidnapped by Communists, tortured and held in some dungeon somewhere and happened to be held in the same cell as Blacks, also subject to the same conditions, of course naturally I would attempt to make some kind of an alliance with them in an effort to escape or to avoid further harm somehow, even if the Communists in question happened to be White.
That's not being "pro-White", that's just being pro-Self...
EuropeanWatchman 2 weeks ago
- I don't value being "pro-White" as an ultimate standard of value in itself, as LR wrongly implies! I see pro-Whiteness as being advantageous to me preservatively for the most part, just as I see my own liberty being advantageous to me for the most part, just as I see the destruction of *some* other people's liberties as being advantageous at *certain* times for the most part, not just to me but to many others whom also invest value in my racial community & the civilization that it sustains!
EuropeanWatchman 2 weeks ago
@EuropeanWatchman You're so vain. You probably think this video is about you.
LibertarianRealist 2 weeks ago
@LibertarianRealist
Aha! So you decided to brake your own little 'treaty' then! SUCH irony! I knew you couldn't take the provocation! lol
No not the whole video, just the part about "rape camps" which you neglected to present in full context again, which btw my teenaged Serbian wife completely agrees on. - In fact by her standards, I am somewhat of a moderate by comparison..
(You'd be surprised at how many Europeans actually want the death penalty back for homosexuality.)
EuropeanWatchman 2 weeks ago
@LibertarianRealist
Well since you've come out of your shell tonight, why not answer this simple question?
EuropeanWatchman 2 weeks ago
@LibertarianRealist
What exactly is the moral difference (if any), between conscriptive procreation facilities for birthdeniers, who contribute to the population collapse of a particular society by witholding births from the racial community of that society, in the midst of a reproduction crisis and the routine consumption of sugar cookies by someone suffering from severe and extreme glycine deficieny? - The same could be said of chemotherapy in relation to the spread of a malignant cancer.
EuropeanWatchman 2 weeks ago
@EuropeanWatchman You're a liar. You said you'd stop spewing your advocacy of compulsory reproduction on my pages. I guess blocking you is the only way to keep you honest.
LibertarianRealist 2 weeks ago
@LibertarianRealist
You're a hopeless idealist and a hypocrite, who yearns for a way of life that died out more than 150 years ago!
On the contrary! I said that I would "refrain from expressing my political opinions on your video comments area", not only did you affirm a completely different option to this one and not only is clarifying my ethical views a different thing entirely from stating my political opinions, but you broke that pact by contacting me yourself!
EuropeanBroadcasts 1 week ago
@EuropeanBroadcasts I never had any treaty or pact with you. I've always reserved the right to block people, though I have generally refrained from doing so. I don't have time for drama or to address particular details of your normative views any further. I reject authoritarian politics and anti-individualistic ethics, and that's that.
LibertarianRealist 1 week ago
@LibertarianRealist
Says the guy who routinely makes videos on the subject of commercial brand names...
("Agreement, treaty, pact, understanding" - it's the same thing and you know it. "Drama!" Ha! With you it's more like a comedy! Why do I need to be told that you have "the right" to block people? What do you think I'm going to do?! Wave a magic wand in the air and zap you through your computer screen?! lol)
EuropeanSplendour 1 week ago
@LibertarianRealist
You already accept authoritarian politics through your advocacy of a military establishment & a criminal justice system! - No! What YOU reject is 'long term realism!' What YOU idealise is an impossibly long term, totally static position on the political spectrum! This is not AMERICA! This is EUROPE! WE, are not just going to let a few million deluded whores from ONE single generation destroy our entire Civilization, because of YOUR disneyland ideals!
EuropeanSplendour 1 week ago
@LibertarianRealist
The liberties of whores who stand in the way of our survival must crushed underfoot! Their human dignity must be twisted out of all recognition, to dehumanize both them AND their ideas! - Not only will we drive out all the non-Whites down the barrel of a gun, but we will hunt down & systematically exterminate ALL CM's under proscriptive legislative orders, like the Republican Commander Sulla!
You wouldn’t put a cancer cell on trial, so why try them?!
EuropeanSplendour 1 week ago
@LibertarianRealist
I can only assume that you have blocked my other account because you know that you HAVE no real answers to my very reasonable questions, as well as many of the other very reasonable questions and counter-arguments which you appear to have absolutely no intellectual capacity to address whatsoever and have therefore opted for censorship as the only recourse!
EuropeanBroadcasts 1 week ago
@LibertarianRealist
I just want you to know however, that I will continue advertising this channel in order to advocate the very ideas which you find so abhorrent! Ha!
EuropeanBroadcasts 1 week ago
LOL! I'm sorry, but I really can't help but intervene here! - LR has got it all wrong! (& perhaps willfuly so...) My ultimate standard of value isn't being "pro-White!" My ultimate standard of value is my own unapologetic self-preservation, both organically within my own lifetime as an independent organism & genetically beyond that lifetime & by extension the self-presevation of the most viable mechanism through which I think that can be achieved; my racial community & its civilizational basis.
EuropeanWatchman 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Darkwizzrobe 2 months ago
I agree with this video, speaking as a pro-white and anti-nazi. The countries that defeated fascism were not multiculturalist. It is not a choice between one or the other. I suspect virtually every educated person was a race-realist before political correctness inverted common sense. Settled and indigenous peoples have rights to their homelands, whites included. Race does not trump freedom, nor has the state any right to encourage or forbid race mixing.
rahotep101 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@"The British-Israel agitation had a disastrous consequence.Men like Cecil Rhodes and Lord Milner were too intelligent, of course,to take the genealogical drivel seriously,but they were so gullible that they did believe in a permanent alliance between Great Britain&J*wry.That sealed the doom of Britain,for the J*ws,with their fixed and instinctive policy of "first defile,and then destroy,"naturally ruin first the nations,such as Germany&Britain,that were most hospitable to them."RPO
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@rahotep101 Indeed. The idea that Nazism need be embraced to eliminate multiculturalism is absurd. Multiculturalism -- a non-populist doctrine favoured by elites rather than the people -- is another aspect of social engineering (SE). SE is another aspect of statism, of a multi-tentacled mega-government that is readily able to implement deficit budgets to fund its SE efforts.
PiotrThePrimate 2 months ago
@PiotrThePrimate, without a "state" there can only be chaos and disorder. People like you would be the first to be eaten....
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203 I'm not arguing for a stateless society. Rather I am advocating a small state that is principally concerned with protecting private property and personal liberty.
PiotrThePrimate 2 months ago
@PiotrThePrimate, I think the Confederacy tried that but they ran into a problem with a union of states.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@ThingsComeUp Agreed!
BootboyJohnny 2 months ago
I believe humanity is better by the presence of white people. Do you agree? What part of humanity do you think we can and maybe should do without. We adopt causes such as save the whales, dolphins because the world is better with them. Why not a better world by saving white children?
AFRICA FOR AFRICANS, ASIA FOR ASIANS AND WHITE COUNTRIES IS OBVIOUS. It shows the white genocide going on in all white countries. HELP US STOP WHITE GENOCIDE. Why is that not a desirable goal?
SAVETHECHILDREN6592 2 months ago
'The Germans noble character was repressed under totalitarian national socialism'
They were ahead of most other nations technologically by about 20 years....I mean you could even argue that we would not be in space without National Socialism.
Hardly 'repressed' in my opinion.
ChurchillWorePanties 2 months ago
@ChurchillWorePanties, I know, they were having babies like crazy and had the highest per capita income of any nation in modern history. Hardly repressed
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
The highest income per capita was not real wealth. A lot of their economy was fake and was living off borrowed money. They borrowed tons of money from countries like the Netherlands and many others that they later invaded. Their economy would not have sustained but collapsed like the Soviet's massive statist economy did that had great productivity at first.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, lol, this is your best tale yet. Really man, don't be so obvious, have some couth.
Germany's economy was successfull, despite a world wide jooish boycott, because they excised their Parasite and organized their labor. Germany relies on her imports of grain to live and her exports of precision technology and heavy machinery to pay for that grain. Holland was suffering in the Depression like GB and USA so I don't see how they loaned Germany much ...
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
The problem is you don't know the economics or the history of Nazi Germany. You don't have any specific numbers or stats, just assertions as well as neo nazi propaganda. Government income had been 10 billion Reichsmarks in 1928. In 1939, it stood at 15 billion. However, government spending had increased from 12 billion Reichsmarks in 1928 to over 30 billion in 1939 - a difference of 15 billion Reichsmarks. That increase in spending was funding by borrowing.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, no, the problem is that you are trying to justify Great Britain's alliance with international j*wry, both zionists and communists, against the cultural and militray heart of Europe ie Germany(Austria), Italy, Hungary, Vichy France etc.
Hitler virtually eliminated German unemployment and gave Germans the highest standard of living and self-respect they had yet enjoyed while Roosevelt's "Joo Deal" was hampering growth and starving Americans.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
France was not pro Nazi and a majority of Austrians didn't want to join Nazism so the Nazis invaded a held a Soviet style vote. Funny that Nazi puppet governments with occupying Nazi troops are considered the true countries by you. You keep bring up jews with no documentation or anything again as your dogmatic, non sourced political hammer. You in reality justify a dozen European countries being invaded by Nazis. I am not a fan of Roosevelt or the New Deal.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
I could borrow 4x my income, purchase cultural icons, have more materials etc but eventually I have to pay it back and to even continue in the meantime I would have to borrow more from the same group or find someone else to fund my excesses that didn't match my productivity. That is what Nazi Germany was doing. You confused borrowed money as real wealth when in fact Nazi Germany would have collapsed just like the Soviets. Nazis spent over double what they took in.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, wrong, National Socialist Germany was successfull economically because they produced food and goods for domestic consumption.They had to import some raw materials such as iron ore from Sweden and grain from abroad. To pay for this they exported precision technological machinery/equipment,just like they do today.
The soviet union "fell" to make it look like communism had been defeated while Clinton and Blair implemented marxist policies in the West
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203 "The soviet union "fell" to make it look like communism had been defeated while Clinton and Blair implemented marxist policies in the West" Thats is nonsense. Centrally planned economies do not work. Read Hayek and Mises critiques of socialism and communism. The Austrian school predicted the failure of centrally planned economies. Also the idea of "Marxist policies" is suspect in that Marx wrote nothing of policy and 95% of his work is a critique of capitalism
PiotrThePrimate 2 months ago
@PiotrThePrimate, you obtuse mattoid. Clinton and Blair were both for open borders, both pandered to non-whites, both cozied up to China, Clinton bombed nationalist, Christian Serbia in support of communist, muslim Albanians, they both shipped manufacturing jobs to the third world and implemented "hate crime" legislation, among other treasonous and MARXIAN 'things', did Marx ever talk about 'things'?
Capitalism and Communism are two sides of the same shekel, hence WW2....
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203 No, Marx never anticipated the deindustrialisation of the Anglo-sphere and Europe and the shifting of manufacturing to China and the concurrent conversion of China to capitalism. Marx predicted that capitalism would fail because of failing rates of profit over successive business cycles, and that doesn't appear to have happened. Relax, take it easy with the insults. You appear to be economically illiterate but I am not beating you over the head with that. Chill.
PiotrThePrimate 2 months ago
@PiotrThePrimate, if you're not angry then you're not alive....
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203 Keep your anger. There is no need for the insults, they only lower the quality of the discussion and don't have any persuasive power. Stay angry but argue your point with reference to sound argument and evidence and dispense with the insults.
PiotrThePrimate 2 months ago
@DIEversity203 Save the insults for the true dickheads that have no sympathy for our mutual cause and will not hear us out.
PiotrThePrimate 2 months ago
@PiotrThePrimate, fair enough :)
I just do not see how serious people can say that Churchill was right in allying Great Britain with international bolshevism to defeat nationalist Germany and her allies; especially since the advent of the internet which has brought information to us that was once suppressed or only available to serious scholars and researchers.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, wrong again, cromwell, the majority of Austrians DID support anschluss, hence the millions of Austrians greeting Hitler. If so many Austrians were against re-unificatiuon then why didn't someone shoot Hitler? He rode around in an open air Mercedes and was surrounded by huge crowds. Schussnig wouldn't allow Austrians to vote for anschluss, only against it.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, it's funny how you only acknowledge capitalist/communist puppet states, occupied by allied troops as legitimate governments.
"You keep bringing up the joos, blah blah"... Have you ever heard of the BALFOUR DECLARATION? How about the British-Israel Movement? How about the fact that the Brits and Americans deliberately lied at Nuremburg about joos being turned into soap, lampshades, electricuted on a wet floor in auschwitz(the story b4 the gas chambers)
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance " a majority of Austrians didn't want to join Nazism so the Nazis invaded a held a Soviet style vote." Yeah we heard that line already. again the fact is Austrians voted in favor of joining Germany one simply needs to see the heroes welcome the Austrians gave Germany.
ssszar 2 months ago
@ThingsComeUp
The future is important and understanding the past is important as well. A lot of the western nationalist movement (maybe a quarter to half who knows) are just pro nazi and will make any excuse of the white invasion of Nazi Germany who started the war. They are bad for the movement for a variety of reasons but I think the most important are
1. They are ahistorical-They make up facts and stats with no sources
2. They are a PR nightmare
3. They are anti US/UK
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, 1. how am I making up facts by stating that the minorities within Czechslovakia wanted independence like the Slovaks, or to rejoin with their mother countries, in the case of the Poles, Hungarians, Germans, etc for the 20th time?! Look at the land successions and see all the countries that annexed areas of Czechslovakia because of the Munich Conference you anti-white moron.
2. Your parroting back the party line is an effrontery to the public, lemming
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIE
It is funny that you defend separation and nationalism for ethnic minorities in the successful nation of Czechoslovakia (in favor of Nazi Germany) but then are completely fine with the Nazi invasion and occupation of a dozen white countries, many that were neutral, all in the name of a "united" (occupied) Europe. I know of Hungary and Poland's actions after Nazi invasion. That isn't a source that a majority in those areas wanted it, but geopolitical action by governments.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, really, are you that stupid, seriously man, you are like a block wall in the road of reason. Why do you think there is no Czechslovakia today? Huh?! WHY? Because after communism had forced Czechs, Slovaks and others to live under the same government for 50 the people opted for INDEPENDENCE, just like they did when DEMOCRACY had forced them to live under the same government after WW1 you fool. By do you keep beating your weakest point, lemmingwitz?
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
I am WAITING for the evidence/SOURCES that a majority in Czechoslovakia or a majority of the minorities in that country wanted a NAZI INVASION/OCCUPATION of their country and wanted to break away from the most successful country in central/eastern Europe in right wing capitalist 1938 Czechoslovakia, not the failed later Soviet occupied communist Czechoslovakia.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, where are your sources that Father Josef Tiso, a Catholic priest and Slovak nationalist wasn't the voice for Slovak nationalists and became their leader in the independent Slovak Republic? POLAND ANNEXED TERRITORY FROM CZECHSLOVAKIA, HUNGARY ANNEXED TERRITORY FROM CZECHSLOVAKIA, ROMANIA ANNEXD TERRITORY FROM CZECHSLOVAKIA ETC! MY PROOF...?, LOOK UP A MAP OF THE PARTITION YOU IMBECILE!
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
Again more assertions and smokescreens. NO STATS NO FIGURES JUST ASSERTIONS. You don't know the difference between geo political action by states and the people within the country that the action is being taken against. WHAT ARE THE STATS/FIGURES OF THIS PRO NAZI MAJORITY IN CZECH oF ETHNIC MINORITIES WANTING A NAZI INVASION AND OTHER ANNEXATIONS? Are do you we just have more assertions and asking to prove a negative. Maybe something about Jews?
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, do you have proof that you are not retarded?
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, "nazi", "nazi", "nazi", "nazi"......
You sound like an "anti-racist"
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
But you are mostly a national socialist. That is the truth! LOL. They would be right to call you a Nazi. A communist could say Berlin was the capital of Germany and they would be right about that but wrong about their positions. They are not anti racists just like you are not pro white. You are pro nazi/sympathetic to Nazi invasions of white nations as well as failed Nazi economics, they are anti white.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance Make the video!
return135 2 months ago
@Anglosphere, you are pro-zionist/communist and thereby a proponent of our present situation because you are defending the Churchill/Rosenfeld cabal that prohibited Germany, Hungary, Italy, Slovakia, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Finland, Croatia, Romania, Bulgaria, Vichy France and numerous volunteers from Belgium, Holland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Spain and Portugal from defeating communism and keeping joos out of our lands.
You say you are anti-nazi, what you are is stupid
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, 3. the US/UK was anti-German, Austrian, Vichy French, Italian, Romanian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Estonian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Finnish, Bulgarian, Slovak and the countless volunteers from Denmark, Belgium, Norway, Spain, Sweden....not to mention anti-NATIONALIST and pro-ONE WORLD
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
They were not anti German, just anti German domination of Europe. Vichy France was opposed by most French and the leader was imprisoned after the war was over by the French people. Italy declared war on the allies in support of Germany's white invasion. The balken's the British were not anti or pro. Denmark, Belgium, Norway, etc JOINED the allies after NAZI INVASION. Germany invaded Yugoslavia and Greece as well and was anti slav.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, once again, please refer back to my last comment for my reply to your incessant need to repeat your fictitous account of history and your schizophrenic grasp of the present.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
But you don't know history. You have already proven it about the Russian revolution and the West's reaction, the Nazi invasion of Austria before the vote that would reject uniting with Nazi Germany that ended with a Nazi military coup de tat soviet style vote, the Danish royal guard's resistance to the Nazi invasion, the MIXING UP of communist Czech with 1938 Czech, geo politicial states with majorities, Nazi puppet governments with majorities, etc.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, you are right, I have never heard of the "history" that you speak of because it is part of your indoctrination to be a means of your own destruction.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
The problem is you just have neo nazi propaganda and assertions along with history that you have even admitted you got wrong. I have sources, states, and figures as well as the history of what those countries did and the white treason of Nazi Germany's European invasion and back door dealings with the Soviets against the right wing governments in Eastern Europe along with siding with radical Muslims.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, no, once again the problem is that you are parrotting mainstream zionist myths and soviet war propaganda and calling it "history".
I have already answered your delusions about WW2 in previous comments, at this time I would ask you to refer to them. Thank you and Merry Christmas
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
I love how you keep ignoring how the actual free vote in Austria was predicted to reject unification with Nazi Germany so the Nazis invaded and held a Soviet style vote that magically made it pass after Nazis occupation with 90%! As for the Czechs still no evidence a majority of the minorities wanted a break up of the country and a Nazi invasion. As for the US/Nazi ships if it is true I will take back US declaring war since i am not blinded like you. PM evidence
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, you are one thick-headed lemming. I believe your ultimate destination is the abyss over the cliff despite all my efforts at reasoning with you. Schussnig wouldn't allow Austrians to vote for anschluss, only against it. Did the Irish and Scotts cheer the British brigands and line the streets with flowers for them?
Once again with the Czechslovakia issue, please refer to my last 20 replies to you about it you history channel tool.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203 It is actually you that is the "thick-headed lemming" in that you and your ilk are presenting Europeans a false dichotomy of multicultralism vs. national socialism i.e. two unattreactive options. Anyone that wants to live under a fascistic regime, having all aspects of their life directed by an all-powerful State is definitive of a "lemming" -- a mindless, obeient drone waiting for its next instructions. Most people find all forms of totalitarianism repulsive.
PiotrThePrimate 2 months ago
@PiotrThePrimate " having all aspects of their life directed by an all-powerful State is definitive" Hmm, seems the very a-typical and incorrect idea of what National Socialism is as is told to us by the jewish media.The reality is very different and beautiful. One cannot argue that under National Socialism the Germans were unhappy. I wonder, what is the libertarian/liberal democratic answer to the nightmare the west is now in?
ssszar 2 months ago
@ssszar "what is the libertarian/liberal democratic answer to the nightmare the west is now in?" (1) Eliminate central banking; (2) return to the gold standard; (3) run balanced budgets; (4) shrink the state and its bureacracy by eliminating all aspects of social engineering and intrusion into the private sphere; (5) employ the military strictly for defensive purposes (6) return to/adopt constitutionalism and republicanism.
PiotrThePrimate 2 months ago
@PiotrThePrimate Spoken like a true capitalist, the ideas you brought up only address our economic issues and re not very adequate. Basically they are the ideas of a dying system. Just as the the wiemar republic, they fail to actually address the issues at the core of our problems we have today. The problems we face today, are at its core, racial problems and until that is addressed, all this talk of republicanism [which got us into this mess] is useless nonsense.
ssszar 2 months ago
@ssszar Economic strength and stability are prerequisites for further action. What I am proposing is necessary but certainly not sufficient -- that I concede. It is the USAs slow move away from republicanism and towards democracy that has enabled many of the problems that the USA is now facing. The racial problems can be better addressed from a position of economic and governmental strength.
PiotrThePrimate 2 months ago
@PiotrThePrimate, I guess thats why the overwhelming majority of Germans enjoyed more freedom than they had under the Kaiser, the Weimar Republic or the occupied "republic" that they are today.
The fact is that international capitalists Great Britain and the United States allied themselves with international communist Soviet Union to destroy Nationalist Germany, Nationalist Hungary, Nationalist Italy, Nationalist Slovak Rep, Nationalist Romania, Nationalist Estonia, etc.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@PiotrThePrimate, you can simply look at the suicide numbers before 1933 in Germany, under democracy and after 1933 under evil totalitarian NATIONAL socialism, not fascism....
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance
Britain siding with communists? = real treason.
Paying the price for it? = today.
ChurchillWorePanties 2 months ago
@Churchill
Actually the British and French refused to join the Soviets in wanting to stop the Nazi invasion of Czechoslovakia. It was the Nazis who made a NAP and agreed to split Poland with the Soviets so the Nazis could fight the French and British. The Nazis additionally failed to beat the Soviets and handed Eastern Europe to them making the Anglosphere having to stop the spread of communism later. The Nazis invaded a dozen white countries. They are anti white.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, great Britain bombed the most beautiful cultural centers in Europe and turned half of Europe over to jooish bolshevism. Churchill and his punks were anti-white and pro-zionism and so are you.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
Are you confused? The Nazis lost the war and handed Eastern Europe over to the communists. The Allies couldn't take it all back at that time. It wasn't an "agreement" like the agreement of the NAP and splitting of Poland to the Soviets to fight the West, it was a recongization of the reality of the consequences of Nazi failure and the Cold War that did end in Western success. It was the Germans too who released Lenin the bolshevik you fool into Russia! lol
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, huh, so the "nazis" handed Eastern Europe over to the soviets by backing the various people's of those nations and allying with them against the soviets, really? The Brits and Americans arming and feeding the bolshevik nun rapers and chucrh burners were not responsible for turning Europe over to communism? Huh, that's some interesting logic there, Cromwell.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
The British and American governments did not fund the bolsheviks and only after the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union did they give them aid. Nazi Germany by the way declared war against the US not the other way around. The Nazis allied with a few central eastern European countries. The other half they invaded like Yugoslavia, Greece, Poland, Austria, Czechoslovakia, etc.They then failed to beat the Soviets and left the Anglosphere 50 yearsto deal with the Soviets.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, Roosenfeld had ordered American ships to fire on German merchant ships and U-boats starting in 1940. According to most, that in itself was an act of war.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203 You can't get through to the anglosphere with reality. They have Stockholm syndrome in a resistant form that could more properly be called "London syndrome' at this point. The anglosphere is dead. The British empire is dead. The brits sacrificed it for the commies at the direction of the yehuds. Churchill instigated the war at all costs to save yehudery. America went along with it and is also paying for it. GB now only exports fraud and harbors financial criminals.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago
@DeltaNordicAdvance, yes, I came to the same conclusion days ago yet I find it amusing to destroy his illusions about the allies somehow fighting a just holy war against "evil nazis" to make the world safe for "democracy" and to put the Germans back under the usury of "God's Chosen Race".
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, Ireland? Ireland? Ireland?
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
I don't agree with a great deal of the English as well as later British actions in Ireland as I have said. I am not like you that always makes excuses for anti white invasions and occupations. For instance, I wish Gladstone's wish to make Ireland a free white dominion much earlier would have been adopted instead of the problems that presided later because of it.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@ChurchillWorePanties Yes sir. Being anti US/UK/Israel alliance (he forgot that one , conveniently) is the only sane approach in light of the state of that alliance and the legacy of ruin that it has left in Europe and the deteriorating 'anglosphere'.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago
Smart White men like LibertarianRealist scare people like Noel Ignatiev!
MrWatchdawg77 2 months ago 7
@ThingsComeUp, thank you brother. I feel the same way towards LibertarianRealist, and even Anglosphere despite my German and Irish heritage. I just wish white people who are awakened to what's going wouldn't be inadvertent conveyors of anti-German propaganda. Saying that Lebensborn were "rape camps" and that Germany was solely responsible for WW2 and therefore our present multi-cultural proletarian paradise only serves the purpose of the joos and their lackeys.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@ThingsComeUp
It should be a comment to him.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
An excellent video. To be racially conscious is not some kind of aberration, as the left maintain, but the natural default position of nearly all human beings. The Cambridge academic, George Steiner, argues that racial consciousness is part of our biological heritage, an evolutionary survival strategy. To want 'your group' to survive and be in charge of its own affairs is only natural.
atticana 2 months ago
@ThingsComeUp, nobody is bowing to Hitler. I do not worship him and I think he made many mistakes but he was far more of a "white nationalist" than Roosenfeld, Churchill or Stalin.
I can't believe how many people continue to propagate jooish myths about the ONE man in modern history who freed his nation from joos and communism.
I don't even talk about him unless someone makes outrageous claims like the Lebensborn camps were "rape camps"....
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
Actually we are responding with history and white treason committed by uncle adolf. Not your beloved talking points about "jewish myths" that you so much enjoying propelling your ideology on since it has little else to be based on.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, I think Churchill and his zionism was the real "white treason".
I hope they wipe your arse with a copy of the Balfour Declaration after you are made an invalid from reaping the multi-cultural benefits of Mr Churchill's actions.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
Supporting Israel is not that big of deal. It has bad foreign policy problems and I don't think they should be a top priority at all unless someone can make the case they are vital to our national security. However, just supporting or allowing a Jewish state is not a big deal. What is worse is invading white countries supporting Muslims against white rule in the Middle East and making NAPs/ splitting Poland with communists and then losing the war handing EE over
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, I know, I can't believe Britain and the Allies did/do those things.
Hail The UN, Hail the American-British-Israeli Order or you are a NAZI!
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIE
Luckily the Anglosphere beat the Nazis and the USSR and they are both in the ash bin of history. We have the immigration and MultiKULT problem that took effect in laws in the 1960s but we can look to our past of white rule to combat the latest fad. Jewish influence questions are legitimate as is questing supporting Israel but it is not a valid political hammer. NAPS/splitting Poland w/ communists, losing to USSR/ siding with Muslims over white rule was Nazi Germany.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@Anglosphere, yeah, luckily internationalism defeated nationalism and we now live under the Brit-Israeli-American anti-white triumvirate
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203 Exactly, Even Pat Buchanan, no friend of 'nazis', wrote a convincing book that blamed Churchill, not Hitler, for failures of tactic and diplomacy in WWII. Hitler had a plan that would have allowed GB to keep the empire, and to make Germany alone responsible for repelling the Soviets. Instead, the drunk madman Winston attacked Germany, allowed the Soviets to win. GB firebombed Dresden AND lost its empire. As a result the UK has 10x GDP in debt and full on multicult.
DeltaNordicAdvance 2 months ago
@DeltaNordicAdvance, yes I know, David Irving's "Churchill's War" says the exact same thing. You can't explain that to utopian libertarians though....
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DeltaNordicAdvance
Do you keep forgetting that Churchill Was not PM until about 5 months after Western Europe was at war with Nazi Germany? As for the rest I have been over it with you several times.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, read "The Case of Tyler Kent" by John Howland Snow from 1947.
DIEversity203 2 months ago
Nobody is trying to make Japan white though, and even if they were it's hard to see how any Japanese person would agree with it. Being pro-white in Europe is totally different from being pro-white in Japan. It's white countries (and really, only white countries) that are having their demographics engineered the most dramatically. The crazy thing is that people actually think this is a good thing and push for it. The non-white immigrants probably don't care what happens to white people either.
j1mmyZeta 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When Ghandi stands up for Indian people, anti-racists call him a hero, When Mandela stands up for black people, anti-racists call him a hero, but when I stand up for White people, anti-racists call me a Naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. Anti-racist is code-word for anti-White.
cooeypig 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I think I will say it again, just because the more I say it, the more it makes sense:
Multicultural societies need more laws.
That is just a simple truth. Think about it.
If nobody has loyalty to anyone except the abstract religion of Political Correctness (which nobody really likes, by the way), there will be more crime.
Multiculturalism creates disorder.
I will say it again: Multiculturalism creates disorder.
Chaos and disorder.
No2Wordism 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AnglosphereAlIiance
How do you oppose the white genocide agenda of the anti-white PC cult when you`re not trying to divert attention to ww2?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Answer:None.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white,and they will try anything to prevent discussion of white genocide.
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance
Is it genocide to attempt to turn all white countries non-white?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No answer.Anti-white false flagger
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance
Is it genocide to attempt to turn all white countries non-white?
Did the Nazis ever advocate doing that?
How do you oppose the white genocide agenda of the anti-white PC cult when you`re not trying to divert attention to ww2?
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
@WhiteRabbitRadioFTW
I know this may be hard for you which I find scary because I didn't think you were a nut. One can actually debate and talk about more than one topic! I think it is anti white to invade a dozen white countries when many were neutral and many were right wing governments. I find it very disturbing of you to try to shut down debate and calling debate about Nazi Germany anti white. Are you just a supporter of Nazi Germany and don't want any debate?
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance <<<<<<<<<false-flag anti-white troll trying to get pro-whites off the white genocide message.
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
@WhiteRabbitRadioFTW, rahotep1, his co-religionist, is also one I believe.
DIEversity103 2 months ago
@WhiteRabbitRadioFTW
So White Rabbit you think history shouldn't be discussed? Do you think supporting Nazi Germany is a good PR move like the Mantra? Why are you attacking my side of the two way debate instead of both of us if for some strange reason you think debate is bad? The truth is all white European countries have a history of pro white policies and the Nazis are not the best to point to and are bad PR. Neo Nazism is a stain on the message.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance
"So White Rabbit you think history shouldn't be discussed?"
No,I think the attempt to turn all white countries brown that is HAPPENING RIGHT NOW is a much more important topic to be trying to reach our fellow white citizens with.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree I am a >>>>>>>naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews<<<<<<<
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
@WhiteRabbitRadioFTW
Thanks buddy but I don't support non white immigration into the West already. I view it as a negative economic, ideological, and sociological turn for the West to continue it. Try using your mantra against someone it would apply to instead of trying to shut down the debate about the anti white policies of Nazi Germany.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, I see you have a Dr Pierce video in your favorites. Perhaps you should try giving him a listen more often...
DIEversity103 2 months ago
@DIEversity103
I have listened to him on World War II and I don't agree with everything that is said in the video I favored. He is dead wrong on his oversimplified explanation on WWII and its incorrect, non-sourced presumptions with no relevant statistics or comparisons.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, Hitler's weakness was his love for the British. He thought that British patriots would call on their racial consciousness and ally with Germany instead of allying with the enemies of Europe to destroy it's very soul....
If his passages about the British in 'Mein Kampf' are not enough proof then how about letting the Brits paddle back to Britain from Dunkirk and then sending Rudolf Hess to Britain to try and make peace and save our race!
DIEversity103 2 months ago
@DIEversity103
Oh my gosh come on. Enough with this crap. In 1939 white countries ruled the world! The only other non white major power was Japan but they were not even in the top three. There were no powerful non white enemies that could military conquer the Anglosphere, Germany, France, or even the nasty Soviets. Again Hitler's invasion and occupation of all of those white countries violated the balance of power in Europe and weakened Britain relatively in the world.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, again, Britain's declaration of war against Germany and not the Bolsheviks weakened Britain and decimated Europe! How would a strong Germany weaken Britain? Please tell me!
DIEversity103 2 months ago
@DIEversity103
Because the balance of power in Europe is ended and Germany can in the future threaten the British isles if conflict ever arose and there would be little allies within Europe that Britain could team up with against future German expansion in Europe. Germany is the one that made a non aggression pact with the Soviets to split Poland because he knew it was likely the invasion of Poland would infuriate the French and British (to keep a balance of power).
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, why on earth would Hitler have wanted to ruin the British Empire, which spread the reign of the white man across the world? Once again, Hitler had nothing but praise and love for Britain. Churchill sold off Britain's possessions to Wall Street to fight Germany! Did that strengthen Britain?
DIEversity103 2 months ago
@DIEversity103
Hitler is not a god. He would not live forever. Relations could sour in the future and the foreseeable future has to be taken into consideration in international relations. Britain gains nothing with Germany dominating continental Europe while getting to keep the Empire they already had which Nazi Germany couldn't take with its worse navy. It weakens Britain relatively and worries France, Britain's closet ally about their old adversity's power gain.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance dont keep wasting your time on him. he wont listen
182511419139208 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, the proper name was National Socialist Germany, you sound like a lemming reciting a New York's Times article to me.
You are absolutely correct. Europe needs to be weak and "balanced" so they can not organzie a formidable defense against their enemies. Once again, thank you for acknowledging that Great Britain and her Joos have played the greatest role in weakening Europe. Playing German states against eachother, even during the Seige of Vienna!
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@WhiteRabbitRadioFTW If you don't want to be called a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews, then don't associate yourself with nazi ideology. Nazism was a cult of conformity not befitting a population of free-thinking white people. The Germans were and are a great people, but their noble character was repressed under totalitarian national socialism. Pro-Nazi is a code word for anti-freedom.
LibertarianRealist 2 months ago 7
@LibertarianRealist
"@WhiteRabbitRadioFTW If you don't want to be called a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews, then don't associate yourself with nazi ideology. "
That`s BS and you know it,the anti-white PC cultists will call any white person who opposes white genocide a nazi,even if there are no "connections".
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist, do you honestly believe that loosely organzied whites will have the fanaticism to defeat multi-culturalism?
"Nazism is the only solution to communism"- George Lincoln Rockwell
DIEversity103 2 months ago
@DIEversity103
Oh you mean when because France and Britain refused to help the Soviets initially against the Germans like Stalin wanted to after Munich? They really were wanting a war with the Germans weren't they? So much so that Hitler made a non aggression pact with the Soviets to split Poland so he could fight the French and British as he weakened the right wing governments in Eastern and central Europe by invading them! Sounds like a great solution!
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, Hitler did everything he could to work out a deal with Poland, they were a valuable buffer state between Germany and Russia afterall. However when he saw that the Brits, French and Americans were telling Poland not to negotiate, and when the commies in Poland stepped up their massacres of Germans, Hitler made a deal with the devil to save the Germans in occupied Prussia.He never thought the Brits and French would do what they did.
DIEversity103 2 months ago
@DIEversity103
Did you see what happened to those who tried to negotiate and gave an inch? Like the Austrian releasing Nazi prisoners or the Czechs giving up some of their land to the Germans at the request of France and Britain? Just how did that turn out for them? Invasion and occupation. That would be bat shit to continue appeasing Hitler when he would just invade anyway. Poland was controlled by a right wing government. The communists had practically no power in Poland
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
This is just a BS false-flagging sand pit.
Must dash,there`s a global white genocide to EFFECTIVELY oppose.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
@WhiteRabbitRadioFTW
Yeah whatever why don't you just go quote the mantra again somewhere? I thought you were more intelligent and thoughtful then this. I will not rally behind any statement or belief that is completely false and that includes the mulitKULT and nazism.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist
Yes I agree the Germans have done a lot for Europeans in many areas. They are by far a net positive. However, like you said the Germans existed for 99% of their time outside of Nazism. Imperial Germany had some good aspects though I don't agree with everything but it was certainly better than Nazi Germany.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@LibertarianRealist Nazi is a code word for anti-freedom? What freedoms did the Germans under Hitler not have? To say the noble character of the Germans was oppressed by the Nazis. was that noble character not oppressed under the wiemar republic? I think you may be making the mistake of equating National Socialism with jewish marxist socialism.
ssszar 2 months ago
The Nazis did not attempt turn Africa non-African.
The Nazis did not attempt turn Asia non-Asian.
The Nazis did not attempt turn all white countries brown.
Can you see where I`m going with this Anti-whitesphere and DIEversity103?
Oh look,we`re on a video discussing white genocide..hmmmmmmm....not much use for talking about Nazis here is there???????
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
@WhiteRabbitRadioFTW
You mean the Anglopshere? The one that expanded white influence in the Americas, Australia, and Africa lol? And the Nazis who weakened white countries in Europe? And you call me anti white? LOL Do you have to be a support of Nazi invasions of white countries to be pro white?
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, yeah all those British soldiers who died building an empire just to have it given away after WW2 by Winnie the Jooh(lover); and then to bring the angry natives of those colonial possesions to Our European homelands to rob, beat, rape and murder us all while we fund it with our taxes. Hail Freedumb!
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
Yes Nazi Germany's invasion of the most white countries of any side in the war by 5 fold and its losing eastern Europe to the Soviets because they couldn't beat them had very bad consequences for the weakening of the West. The British and Americans made mistakes as well like in Zimbabwe, South Africa, and some aspects of decolonization. I don't defend every act of England or Britain but its entire history before 1945 involves less white treason than the Nazis.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, almost all of the European nations were allied with Germany, or neutral trading partners with her. So much for Britain being a champion of small nations, like Ireland huh?
The Brits were allied with extra-European powers, queerbait
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@DIEversity203
Are you crazy? Denmark, Norway, Belgium, Netherlands, France, Britain, etc were part of the allies! Almost all of Northern and Western Europe was with Allies or was neutral!
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Finland, Slovakia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Italy, Vichy France and Hungary were all part of the Axis. Spain and Portugal were pro-Axis and Sweden and Switzerland were neutral and did much trading with Germany. Plus thousands of volunteers from Holland, Belgium, France, Denamrk, Norway and Sweden joined the Waffen-SS. The last two divisions fighting in Berlin were the Norwegian "Nordland" and French "Charlemagne"
DIEversity203 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance
"Anti white? That mantra doesn't apply to me silly "
I suspect you are a false-flag anti-white desperate to shift attention away from white genocide by droning on and on about the Ze evil Nazis when we`re in the middle of a global program of white genocide.
What does this carping about WW2 achieve?
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
@WhiteRabbitRadioFTW
Because it is a PR KILLER and for good reason! So many identify with that neo nazism. And not it is not all I have focused on. You can take a look at my videos on this channel and my other one. NOT one has been about WWII but my next one will be.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance hes pissed because he's a neo nazi
182511419139208 2 months ago
@182511419139208, and you are a neo-zionist poo-poo head oooooh, I too can throw around meaningless media terms that fail to address any of the FACTS that I have presented.
Go mastubate to schindler's list you freak-
DIEversity103 2 months ago
@DIEversity103 you need to chill the fuck out
182511419139208 2 months ago
@182511419139208, you are right. I need to let you assholes continue to propagate the jooish lies about my grandfather unmolested. We don't get enough of "evil nazi" talk on the talmudvision, at the public indoctrination center or from hollywood, do we?
DIEversity103 2 months ago
@DIEversity103
You are acting very spoiled. Just like orthodox leftist anti whites talk about the evils of whites and the euro centric dominated society as a political hammer against criticizing their myths about imperialism, the crusades, etc you use Jews and some bad arguments against Nazi Germany as your hammer against us when we are even directly talking about them.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
*when we aren't even directly talking about poor Jews and the "freedom of Poland" like arguments.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, the "poor joos" and the "freedom of Poland".....those are pretty key issues when discussing WW2, buddy....
DIEversity103 2 months ago
@DIEversity103
Not in reality to why the Allies acted and not the reasons I have been giving. You are just using them as talking points.
AnglosphereAlIiance 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance, what the hell are you preaching about now?
DIEversity103 2 months ago
@DIEversity103 I doubt your grandfather was a Nazi. If he was he was probably a fuck up who was always on disciplinary duty cleaning the shitters at the barracks.
182511419139208 2 months ago
@182511419139208, my Opa was only 10 when the war ended but his oldest brother fought his way through Poland, France and then through Russia, survived Stalingrad and 10 years in the gulags.
I bet your grandfather was one of the cowards dropping bombs on Dresden, bragging about it in his local pub to this day while it isn't even safe for him to walk home at night.
DIEversity103 2 months ago
@DIEversity103 both my grandpas were United States Marines who killed gooks in the Korean war.
182511419139208 2 months ago
@AnglosphereAlIiance
"Nazi Germany INVADED a dozen white countries, "
The so-called "anti-racist" Establishment that you anti-whites support has been invading and messing up many more non-white countries,as well as trying to turn all white countries brown (GENOCIDE).
Everything Hitler said abut the jews,you anti-white say about white people.
RELITH HITLER
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
WhiteRabbitRadioFTW 2 months ago
Multicultural societies need more laws.
That is just a simple truth. Think about it.
If nobody has loyalty to anyone except the abstract religion of Political Correctness (which nobody really likes, by the way), there will be more crime.
Multiculturalism creates disorder.
I will say it again: Multiculturalism creates disorder.
No2Wordism 2 months ago
If you insist White people are not allowed to have their own countries and self determination like non-Whites have in non-White countries, you are an anti-White.
anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White
TheRhiannonwolf 2 months ago 3