It is a verity that Bach's music can be represented as a Mathematical function. You just proved to us that not only it is a standard function, but rather a bijective one. You merely found the inverse. Good job.
Some people like it very much, other like you do not enjoy at all. Thanks for your comment. I never remove criticism, it is allway useful to improve my work.
Interesting interpretation and realization. I never quite realized how well Bach could be performed in variation to the original notes and still be so beautiful. Truly a genius of a very high magnitude!! Your interpretation is amazing!
Fantastic. Bach wrote many Crab Canons and pieces that could be played upside down as well as backwards. The beauty of His work is that is is accessible from anywhere...
Super! Vraiment incroyable! Vos compositions sont toutes magnifiques, merveilleuses, sans exception. La version de Bach vaut celle la! Elles sont toutes deux très belle. La version de Bach a été très bien refaite. Bravo!!
It was cool but obviously the original piece wasn't written for the intent of making it inverted or w/e so it would work better if you made a set of mirror fugues yourself some time
If you mean that you would like I write my own mirror fugue, I can do it. But later because I have several works to do or to complete before. Thanks for your subscription.
As a means of tribute, you could find some of your favorite Bach subjects and, taking from that, make a pair of mirror fugues. The inversion would be there and you would have more freedom to make it work with less constraints. That's what I meant, but anyway, I appreciate your taste in fugues. With every part being equal, the music has much more liveliness and depth
Please, select a fugue of Bach's organ work whose mirror you would like to hear. I cannot promise but I'll try to do it for you. But not before 2 weeks because I will not be at home. JP
@organcomposer well I was saying like a set of two where one will have the original subject but be entirely different otherwise in a way to enable the mirror to sound just as good. I think the second subject from Contrapunctus XIV would be cool.
I will try if I can get some free time enough to do that. But I do not promise it, I have a lot of things to do. It is 03h00 and I am not yet in my bed
I invite you to study both scores and to compare them. The retroccata, played back to front, as could do easily a sequencer would be effectively horrible. I proceed otherwise, I invert the measures one by one or by small groups. Llinking these measures harmoniously is a very difficult exercise, but I think I have reached there, without the help of the devil.
I did a similar thing as an assignment in compositionclass where we had to use Beethovens theme from his 5th symphony 4th mov. I simply turned the theme to make a constracting theme.
un sujet peut etre interprete de milles facons differentes, et la votre est tres satisfaisante. la correspondance entre les notes et les voix est plus recherchee que Bach pour bwv 565, mais je pense que vous etes dans l'exces de la perfection. je ne suis pas musicien mais je pense qu'il est fondamental que la musique soit ecoutable avec des voix simples, mais arrangees dune telle facon que chaque ecoute laisse une impression davoir saute un detail.
Interesting how voice leading works both ways, though the chord progressions not necessarily. Very interesting... the only real beauty is Bach's harmony though... and I don't think you can take credit for that.
I have employed the french music notation software Harmony-Assistant (from Myriad-online) and performed the music with a virtual organ : MyOrgan (from Kloria).
very interesting concept and has a great Bach sound,, A man of many talents. Thanks you....Bill in USA.. May I post this on Frederick Magle International forums site?
A very interesting version. I had never though that a thing like this would be possible. I think it's a good work. Melody fluctuations and harmony process respect the style.
It's like an alternative Bach. It sounds weird for my ears a piece that is the T & F, but really it isn't at all! I like this strange sensation.
Well done, you would have to be made of stone not to enjoy this. A different and fascinating 'take' on such a wellknown piece of Bach. As I play the original I would love to include this version in a concert, perhaps side by side. That should cause plenty of comment!! Yes please, I would like a copy of the score.
Merci Jean-Paul pour cette excellente interprétation de cette merveilleuse oeuvre aux Grandes Orgues de la Cathédrale de Bourges qui est ma ville de naissance !
Merci à Vladimir Kacharov d'apprécier les musiciens de notre pays en espérant un jour le rencontrer à Bourges !
Congratulations Jean-Paul!! 5 stars for you, this is one of the best works I ever heard!! Bach would be proud of you!. Thank you very much J-P, Proud of France
Félicitations Jeanb-Paul! 5 étoiles pour vous, c'est l'une des meilleures œuvres que j'ai jamais entendu!! Bach serait fier de vous!. Merci beaucoup J-P fierté de la France!!
It is a verity that Bach's music can be represented as a Mathematical function. You just proved to us that not only it is a standard function, but rather a bijective one. You merely found the inverse. Good job.
PrivateWarrior1 2 months ago
amm sorry i don't like it :( its like a bad try of a toccata i think
Gerar2891 5 months ago
@Gerar2891
Some people like it very much, other like you do not enjoy at all. Thanks for your comment. I never remove criticism, it is allway useful to improve my work.
organcomposer 5 months ago 2
@organcomposer yes Sir That was my porpose to exchange opions anyway a disagree in something could have in big agrees in other topic-
Good Wishes
Gerar-
Gerar2891 5 months ago
It is a completely different work that has a very modern listening.
agger382 8 months ago
It might be fun to transcribe the entire original piece backwards and see what it sounds like.
wurlic300 1 year ago
what's the point in this?
minasgekos 1 year ago
@minasgekos This question also occured to me :) Somehow it does not sound right...
DulcineaVonTobosa 1 year ago
Interesting interpretation and realization. I never quite realized how well Bach could be performed in variation to the original notes and still be so beautiful. Truly a genius of a very high magnitude!! Your interpretation is amazing!
GaryGP40 1 year ago
Fantastic. Bach wrote many Crab Canons and pieces that could be played upside down as well as backwards. The beauty of His work is that is is accessible from anywhere...
yoelbenyehuda 1 year ago
wow i loved it, i would love to play this piece
kingleoric100 1 year ago
amazing idea! would love to try it out!
roowkool 1 year ago
Amazing Idea!! Would Love to give it a try.... you have the scores?
roowkool 1 year ago
GREAT COMPOSITION!!!
SlanevskyDrums 1 year ago
What tool did you use to make this video?
bachkirche 1 year ago
@bachkirche
I have used 3 tools for that :
Harmony-Assistant (Myriad online) to play and display the score
camstudio (freeware) to film the score displayed on my screen
windows moviemaker to mix music and pictures
I used also myorgan (now grandorgue) to produce the organ sounds,
midiyoke to link harmony-assistant to Myorgan
and Sir 1001 to add the reverb
organcomposer 1 year ago
A very interesting version :) I like it, as well as many others of your pieces. I subbed this week :D
Haniel93 1 year ago
This is a work of a TRUE artist.
nicholas8912 1 year ago
this is totally not bach
presleyrocks1231 1 year ago
Beautiful, but not as glorious as Bach's Toccata and Fugue. It's just a rip off of a truly beautiful song.
Bruceforge 1 year ago
@Bruceforge You mean piece.
Sword1479 1 year ago
@Sword1479 Yes, but I don't really care that much to be picky.
Good for you for being specific.
Technically a composition is art so it could be defined as a song. A piece of art or "song".
song defined as:
a piece of music, usually employing a verbal text, composed for the voice, esp one intended for performance by a solo
Bruceforge 1 year ago
Cool!! I like this. I can listen and follow along watching the notes fly by. i wonder what all the marks mean other than the notes?
Thank you. Keep it up.
marston5000 1 year ago
bravo ! très intéressant ! il suffit de se laisser bercer
rolbern3 1 year ago
This is really coool:D
Szhenrik94 1 year ago
Super! Vraiment incroyable! Vos compositions sont toutes magnifiques, merveilleuses, sans exception. La version de Bach vaut celle la! Elles sont toutes deux très belle. La version de Bach a été très bien refaite. Bravo!!
Tomr971 2 years ago
not bad
vetreria 2 years ago
Very fun to watch! Thank you!
QueenAnnesFury 2 years ago
It was cool but obviously the original piece wasn't written for the intent of making it inverted or w/e so it would work better if you made a set of mirror fugues yourself some time
parquar 2 years ago
If you mean that you would like I write my own mirror fugue, I can do it. But later because I have several works to do or to complete before. Thanks for your subscription.
organcomposer 2 years ago
As a means of tribute, you could find some of your favorite Bach subjects and, taking from that, make a pair of mirror fugues. The inversion would be there and you would have more freedom to make it work with less constraints. That's what I meant, but anyway, I appreciate your taste in fugues. With every part being equal, the music has much more liveliness and depth
parquar 2 years ago
Please, select a fugue of Bach's organ work whose mirror you would like to hear. I cannot promise but I'll try to do it for you. But not before 2 weeks because I will not be at home. JP
organcomposer 2 years ago
@organcomposer well I was saying like a set of two where one will have the original subject but be entirely different otherwise in a way to enable the mirror to sound just as good. I think the second subject from Contrapunctus XIV would be cool.
parquar 2 years ago
I will try if I can get some free time enough to do that. But I do not promise it, I have a lot of things to do. It is 03h00 and I am not yet in my bed
organcomposer 2 years ago
I enjoyed the piece :), I would like to know how and where to get sheet music of this.
trainz10 2 years ago
:P d:
Kwanelauda 2 years ago
Amazing
calisienis 2 years ago
you're a genius, this is fantastic
Edenhyde246 2 years ago
@ch252525 - oh I feel sorry for you.... :P
zszsanna 2 years ago
WOW :)
energia321 2 years ago
I invite you to study both scores and to compare them. The retroccata, played back to front, as could do easily a sequencer would be effectively horrible. I proceed otherwise, I invert the measures one by one or by small groups. Llinking these measures harmoniously is a very difficult exercise, but I think I have reached there, without the help of the devil.
organcomposer 2 years ago
God reveals!! :D
Kwanelauda 2 years ago
when you reverse the sens it doesn't mean anything any longer
anisometropie 2 years ago
What I do is much more difficult that playing the music backward. It needs hours of job. May be you do not like, but many peoples enjoy.
J-P
organcomposer 2 years ago
I did a similar thing as an assignment in compositionclass where we had to use Beethovens theme from his 5th symphony 4th mov. I simply turned the theme to make a constracting theme.
HerrWarja 2 years ago
that French composer who rewritted the original toccata and fugue, is a Genius!
Kraviotho 2 years ago
the composer that wrote the original is even more of a genius
Deathization 2 years ago 15
un sujet peut etre interprete de milles facons differentes, et la votre est tres satisfaisante. la correspondance entre les notes et les voix est plus recherchee que Bach pour bwv 565, mais je pense que vous etes dans l'exces de la perfection. je ne suis pas musicien mais je pense qu'il est fondamental que la musique soit ecoutable avec des voix simples, mais arrangees dune telle facon que chaque ecoute laisse une impression davoir saute un detail.
ceci dit jaime beacoup vos aures compositions.
Xear0 2 years ago
Interesting how voice leading works both ways, though the chord progressions not necessarily. Very interesting... the only real beauty is Bach's harmony though... and I don't think you can take credit for that.
01jocooper 2 years ago 5
What program did you do?
fireblade8577 2 years ago
I have employed the french music notation software Harmony-Assistant (from Myriad-online) and performed the music with a virtual organ : MyOrgan (from Kloria).
organcomposer 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
very interesting concept and has a great Bach sound,, A man of many talents. Thanks you....Bill in USA.. May I post this on Frederick Magle International forums site?
wljmrbill 2 years ago
Bach's music, whether played inverted or backwards is still awe-inspiring.
jrssjdca 2 years ago
That was so cool!
igorstrav1972 2 years ago
Fantastic idea:)
florianchurch 2 years ago
A very interesting version. I had never though that a thing like this would be possible. I think it's a good work. Melody fluctuations and harmony process respect the style.
It's like an alternative Bach. It sounds weird for my ears a piece that is the T & F, but really it isn't at all! I like this strange sensation.
Congratulations.
Turmendia 3 years ago
is almos as beautiful as the original.. but
Reverstar 3 years ago
Realy good rewritting. BRAVO :)
Szwisztak222 3 years ago
Comment removed
bachspirit 3 years ago
Well done, you would have to be made of stone not to enjoy this. A different and fascinating 'take' on such a wellknown piece of Bach. As I play the original I would love to include this version in a concert, perhaps side by side. That should cause plenty of comment!! Yes please, I would like a copy of the score.
chandros 3 years ago
No problem for the score
I can send it to you if you give me your e-mail.
The score is 10 pages in PDF, but i can print it in an other format if you need (i am afraid in 10 pages the notes are a little small).
organcomposer 3 years ago
JP, I'm an old friend of Glenn Gould. And he would have flipped over what you have posted on Youtube. Keep it up!
PointyTail 3 years ago
Comment removed
bachspirit 3 years ago
hello. See again the first pictures of the video, it is written.
JPV
organcomposer 3 years ago
In my opinion the fuge sounds better (more baroque) with an f# at the end. However, you're the composer and you decide what to write...
Nice work!
P.S.: I will look in your web site for the score.
brekkia 3 years ago
Thanks for your comment.
It's not too late to change in the PDF score the last chord into a D major chord, but not in the video.
The score will be on my site in a few hours.
organcomposer 3 years ago
C'est magnifique et genial!!! C'est superlatif!!! Mes felicitations!!! Salut!
ChalieChaplin 3 years ago
Of course this work is inspired from Bach toccata, same number of bars, same skeleton, but new melody and new harmonies.
organcomposer 3 years ago
The score is not quite ready. please give me a mail adress or wait for the score to be published on my web site.
organcomposer 3 years ago
Merci Jean-Paul pour cette excellente interprétation de cette merveilleuse oeuvre aux Grandes Orgues de la Cathédrale de Bourges qui est ma ville de naissance !
Merci à Vladimir Kacharov d'apprécier les musiciens de notre pays en espérant un jour le rencontrer à Bourges !
Bien amicalement , Rosy ♪ ♫
Roselyne18 3 years ago
Congratulations Jean-Paul!! 5 stars for you, this is one of the best works I ever heard!! Bach would be proud of you!. Thank you very much J-P, Proud of France
kacharov 3 years ago
Félicitations Jeanb-Paul! 5 étoiles pour vous, c'est l'une des meilleures œuvres que j'ai jamais entendu!! Bach serait fier de vous!. Merci beaucoup J-P fierté de la France!!
kacharov 3 years ago