Here's how the Spanish Conquistadors behaved on the island of Hispaniola: "They attacked the towns and spared neither the children, nor the aged nor pregnant women nor women in childbed, not only stabbing them and dismembering them but cutting them to pieces as if dealing with sheep in the slaughter house...To others they attached straw or wrapped their whole bodies in straw and set them afire. With still others...they cut off their hands and hung them round the victim's neck" (Las Casas)
The funny thing is what happened to these White so called Native Americans is gonna happen again . Couse in Another 1000 Years there will be no whites in America Will all Be Looking like Native Americans again . VIVA LA RAZA ! LOL!!! SUCKERS
The Olmec heads are purely Native in their facial features. The absence of curly hair aside, their nose, though flat, is not nearly as wide as the typical "Negroid"nose, the mouth, although full-lipped, is not nearly as wide and the eyes are not as large as the typical "Negroid"eyes. The way I see it they are much closer to depicting Ïndians"that they are to depicting "Negroids
HIS-tory is a bunch of layered, lobby-ed lies. No one knows. I live in Northern California. A human thigh bone fragment, possibly as old as 2,500 years or more was found here in 1999. Artifacts have been found here that were carbon dated over 40,000 yrs ago. There, I just debunked the very beginning statement on this video.
The savages were the Whites who fed Native babies to thier dogs, and tested the sharpness of thier swords by cutting people in half. If not for the Natives who taught the whites (who were resorting to cannibalism) to survive off of the land (think Thanksgiving), they would not have made it through the winters. The scalping actually came from the British who paid money per indian scalps.Not all Natives abuse alcohol, that's just an ignorant myth. We are survivors and we're educating ourselves
The subtitle at the end of the video is misleading. -- Here is a quote from the National Park Service:
"We were unable to obtain reliable ancient DNA amplification results from the Kennewick samples. This means that either (1) no original DNA was preserved in the bone samples transferred to our laboratory, or (2) original DNA was preserved in the bone samples but we were unable to extract it."
Doesn't mean it WILL NEVER happen, but they were unable to at this point.
"Some anthropologists have noted that the narrow, elongated skull shape of Kennewick Man — and other features traditionally called "Caucasoid" — are shared by several early populations in Asia and the Pacific. Based on this information, many scholars believe that it would be "far-fetched" at this point to suggest that Kennewick Man came from Europe."
We don't need any theory of European ancestory to explain Kennewick man. Beringia is sufficient.
@Inari1987 You're 100% WRONG. First, everyone denied that America was settled by non-Indians. But, once the evidence was indisputable; people suddenly claimed that it was probably Chinese or Japanese Inu. Yup, they tried to claim it was anyone except for Europeans. Now, what about Ice Age Columbus? THey came to America (Virginia) 10,000 years earlier than Kennewick. This could explain the migration pattern. Now, why the hell are Jews so interested in this subject?
@TheGameLord7 This really begs the question as to why we do not see this in the DNA which indicates no such European migration, not to mention no Jewish Migration.
@Inari1987 Okay, let's play the cards backward. There is evidence of peoples inhabiting North America thousands of years ago who were NOT "Native American Indian". (2), the Virginia migration was DEFINITELY older than the Washington State migration. (3) There was DEFINITELY warfare and genocide committed by the American Indians. (4) The Thumbs-up received by your comments were artificially tabulated. I'm not sure by whom. But it was not natural. So, that's very strange.
@TheGameLord7 The reason the evidence in Virginia is older is for two reasons: 1) The Ice Glaciars during the last Ice Age covered much more of the western part of the continent, so the peoples migrated AROUND the ice sheets and Virginia was exposed at that time. Also, we know now that the Indians would have migrated on the VERY fringe of the American continent that was exposed at the time, but now under the pacific ocean. Again, a huge chunk of the west was covered by glaciars, so we should not
@Inari1987 even expect to find the evidence in areas that would have been uninhabitable. ---As for the question of genicide....I fail to even see why you have even brought that up.
@Inari1987 Your previous comment was untrue. and, you know it. The Virginia Evidence is dated Circa 17,000 B.C. While the Kennewick remains are almost 10,000 years younger. The Oldest evidence apparently comes from the east. Also, you also know that your people denied ANY evidence of these anomalies. Now, you're fixed upon making some sort of explanation. And, I mentioned previous genocides because it reminds us that white people are not the evil villains which we are portrayed
@TheGameLord7 I know how old Kennewick Mann is, and I know the archeology well (I am working on my degree in Native American history, after all). And no, I am not making up any of the explanation. It is widely accepted. When you talk about the Virginian evidence, you are talking about spear points found there; I do not deny that exists. It is perfectly explainable since the coastal rout (not the usual corridor through Alaska and the Yukon) also was accesible 17,000 years ago, at
@Inari1987 just the right time that you point out. (There is also evidence that humans had reached the Americas 50,000 years ago, but that is still in question.) -- No one here is saying that Indians were incapable of cruelty or that whites were inherently evil. I fail to see why you are even making that an issue.
@Inari1987 For a basic view of the typical archeological view of how and when the first inhabitents came to America, I would recommend you to watch the BBC's "The Incredible Human Journey: America" which is actually available on YouTube. I'll give the link to the first part:
@Inari1987 and there is still no evidence for a supposed "Indian" Genocide against Kennewicks. The WHITE Genocide against Native Americans however is both well documented and huge- 15 million Native deaths between 1492-1542 according to Bartolomeo de las Casas and 100 million Native deaths between 1492-1890 according to David Stannard. The slaughter of Natives continued well into the 20 century in Argentina, Brazil and especially Guatemala
@ComradeFlorian31 True, that evidence does not exist, and certainly not archeologically..and an ancient mass genocide would leave an abundance of archeological evidence. --Thanks for mentioning Stannard. His book is highly recommended. Anyone with an honest desire to learn about Euro-Genocide against the Native peoples of America would do well to read it.
"Some anthropologists have noted that the narrow, elongated skull shape of Kennewick Man — and other features traditionally called "Caucasoid" — are shared by several early populations in Asia and the Pacific. Based on this information, many scholars believe that it would be "far-fetched" at this point to suggest that Kennewick Man came from Europe."
We don't need any theory of European ancestor to explain Kennewick man. Beringia is sufficient..
Wasn't Arlington Springs Woman found to have lived 13,000 years ago, much earlier than Kennewick Man? And to my knowledge, scientists were not able to retrieve DNA from Kennewick Man.
First there is NO evidence whatsoever that Kennewick People were "genocided" by "Indians" as some White Nationalits allege. Whereas the WHITE Genocide of Native Americans is both well documented and HUGE- something like 100 million Native deaths in 4 centuries according to Davod Stannard. "Indians" and Kennewicks could simply have INTERBRED hence the large proportion of Native Americans with prominent Caucasoid-like noses. Sorry but White Nationalism still has NOTHING in his defence
@ComradeFlorian31 The evidence is basically the shape of the skull.. The problem is that determining race by skull shape is not even an exact science. So this may not even be European at all.
For a start the Native Americans themselves have tales of the whites they killed and the remains of these whites is proof enough.As for whites killing Native Americans.....sorry,but most Natives were killing themselves off and disease was also a major factor so no,it is not well documented that whites committed genocide against these so called ''Native Americans''.
@ComradeFlorian31 Then where the fuck did they go? They're not here anymore! And stop with the trying to run around the conversation with the white nationalism bullshit. It's only going to encourager the people to study harder. And Kennewick Man was killed by "Native" Americans, by a tribe in the Pacific Northwest. He was a white man, that was persecuted by the color of his skin. The irony.
@ComradeFlorian31 Just because they aren't here anymore, doesn't mean they never existed. How the heck can you still be around when the invaders didn't want it to happen? Do you accuse the owners involved in a home invasion, to never have existed, if the criminal kills them both? Of course not, that would be silly. Besides, you better lighten up on this whole EVERY Indian tribe came from Asia thing. That's also utter bullshit. Some were Jews, Blacks, and Whites.
@ComradeFlorian31 How much more modern human bones and other scientific evidence of Whites and Blacks being here before Indians has to be discovered, until you remove your head out of your tight little ass? I'm starting to believe...sadly...none. And you'll spend the rest of your life ducking and dodging, cause that's all that's left.
@ComradeFlorian31 And don't get me started with the Olmec thing. There is a decent chance of them being black. The reason I have, is that, the Indian lovers are going to tell me that they came from Alaska. Okay, went through Alaska (No Civilization), went through Canada (No Civilization), went through the ENTIRE United States (No Civilization), and FINALLY said, "Okay men, this looks like a good place to begin our Indian Civilization!" Right next to the Gulf of Mexico...hmm...
@ComradeFlorian31 You keep fighting the truth. It's ALL you Indian Invaders HAVE! The Black and White communities our waking up. We are SICK of your bitching! And finally we have proof to shut you up once and for all! The time will come when the bitching will finally seize, and we can ALL get some peace and quiet. Not only are you guys not "Native," but you're the furthest from it! You guys made your arrival dead last!
@ComradeFlorian31 Besides, you guys talk like the New World is somehow your motherland or something. It never was. That's another myth. You guys come from Asia. Which your ancestors probably stole from Europeans, as evident in the White cemetery recently discovered in China.
@ComradeFlorian31 And that number is grossly exaggerated by you and your butt buddy David Stannard. The number is way too high, cause I believe that would have been the ENTIRE Indians at ANY TIME in AMERICA! People say that there was a few million Indians here (Im going with just in the United States) and the number dropped to like 250000. Give or take that's about 89750000 more. Unless Latin and South America had way more. You know how many babies a couple would have produced?
@ComradeFlorian31 Plus, he sounds pretty phoney and an agitator. That is a HUGE assumption to make, when the highest number I have seen is 15 million in the time of the occupation. Besides, why the FUCK do I care? Why am I even focusing on that number. My team (Europeans) won the war. We kick ass. I'm going to start having more pride in the battles and wars that we have fought and won for now on.I'm SO sick of listening to the losers bitch. ALL RACES have experienced GENOCIDE!
@ComradeFlorian31 ALL RACES have experienced land conquering, you freckin' moron! Asia is taking Tibet as we speak. Great Britain tried to get Scotland. Celts lost Spain, Babylonia lost to Israel. Africa JUST lost Egypt and Libya. Hitler tried to capture Europe, but was stopped by the Soviet Union, who then tried to get Eastern Europe, but lost to now Russia. Muslims tried to take Europe and was stopped by the Crusades.
@ComradeFlorian31 Europe has actually had to defend their homeland more times then any other nation. And does that make it on the news, no. You know why, because Europeans don't bitch. It's not in our blood. We're warriors and we will fight in battles, no matter how brutal! Then, we will fight each other in Civil War. We will fight on your shore or ours! Bravery be thy name, and the wisdom be my might! You just don't have any idea how much this country and the world may need us
@ComradeFlorian31 Besides, the Olmecs, who were black Africans, lost Mexico to the Indians from Asia. *Claps* Congratulations dude, you get the hypocrisy award of the night. Besides, no telling how many of your ancestors slaughtered people who were here originally. Just because we don't know the numbers doesn't mean it isn't there. They had to do something to take down a civilization like the Olmecs. Didn't they? Gonna tell me that the Olmecs didn't believe in kids?
@RealTalk147 Olmecs are never depicted with curly African-like hair. Also thick lips are fairly common among certain Native American tribes, they are by no means indictive of an African ancestry. Stannard didnțt exxagerate anything all right, he speaks the truth and numbers do add up. Bartolomeo de las Casas estimated 3 million Natives in tiny Hispaniola ALONE before Columbus and 15 million Native deaths throughout Spanish-occupied America in 50 years ALONE so the 100 million figure makes sense
@ComradeFlorian31 Okay, 15 + 3 = 100? Again, how many Indians would that make, a lot. Also, I don't study mesoamerica stuff that much, but I do know that the moors helped out the spanish people kill the people down there. And also, speaking of hairs, have you seen The Monkey statue of the Olmec? Now if that ain't an afro, then I don't know what is.
@RealTalk147 3 million Natives in Hispaniola before Columbus according to Las Casas, 15 million Native deaths troughout America between 1492-1542 according to Las Casas and 100 million Native deaths troughout America between 1492-1890 according to David Stannard, see how the numbers DO add up? As for Olmec art I'm quite familiar with it but since you brought this Monkey Statue up I''ll give it a look
@ComradeFlorian31 It only adds up if you click your heels. I mean, Jesus, do you know Comrade that I saw a person on here that believes there is still genocide going on towards the Indians today? 2011? We can't beat something if reality doesn't matter anymore. I will begin to believe in Bigfoot for now on. Plus, just like the original Holocaust, this POS doesn't want to say that it wasn't just Indians from Asia. Also Whites and Blacks were killed.
@ComradeFlorian31 Its Jews ONLY got killed all over again. I don't trust anyone who uses the term "Holocaust" anymore. Does he say that in his book? That there were many Black, White, and Jewish Indian tribes here when Columbus arrived? The Olmec Art has full and goatee breads on some for CHRIST SAKES! People say that this facial hair was common among Europeans. Either Columbus' team killed these people, or the Indians from Asia did.
@ComradeFlorian31 There is a Roman Ruins in Colorado that the ASIAN Indians won't touch and go on, because it has "evil spirits." Why you think that? Because there use to live White people there. Come on man!!! They didn't even have a chance to use the civilization that they built for themselves, cause they ALL got slaughtered by the Indians. The Indians know who was THERE! They know that they killed all those White people there. Just like they did with the Black Olmecs.
@ComradeFlorian31 So, I guess my question is, who are you sad for when it comes to the Indians? Are you mad for the Jewish Cherokee? You upset for the White Indians in the Northeast? You sad for the Black Indian tribes in Mexico? You outraged for all Racial Indian groups, or just the red ones who came from Asia? That's selective outrage, which means your outrage is shit!
@RealTalk147 not allNative Americans share the sameskin colour,not all Native Americans share the same nose or lips or type of hair etc- that of course does not mean that Reds killed Whites and Blacks.I have googled that Olmec Monkey God of yours and all could find was a picture of a monkey-human hybrid with NO TRACE of African hair! That's all I could find sadly
@ComradeFlorian31 The statue clearly shows an African more than it shows a red Indian though. That's all I'm saying. What does it show MORE of? Really look at it. Those lips, that Afro looking head! And yes, I do know that the red Indians slaughtered my ancestors at the Roman Ruins in Colorado, because those are the ones who talk about it. Their parents told the current generation all about it. And then they call it a place of "evil spirits." Sick!
@RealTalk147: You speak as if only one type of "red Indians" existed while I have already said Native American peoples VARY in their physical features to a considerable extent, some of them are lighter some of them are darker, some of them feature hooked noses other feature flat ones, some of them have Asian-like eyes others show no trace of the Asian eye-fold. These features may have been evolved independetnly or through admixure but theres still NO evidence of large scale killing of Kenewicks
@ComradeFlorian31 and even if there were evidence for Indian-Kennewick wars, there is still no evidence for an Indian Genocide against Kennewicks. Most "Indian" tribes that were studied by Europeans used to ADOPT members of the defeated tribes rather than slaughtering them Old Testament-style. More advanced Native tribes used to sacrifice prisoners of wars but this could certainly not have been the case with the "Indian" contemporaries of the Kennewick man
@ComradeFlorian31 You kinda sound like you're in denial of how vicious these red Indians can be. Look, there is a reason why they were called savages, right. Historians looked at their rap sheet, and was like, "Holy shit, these were savages!" I mean, they did HUMAN SACRIFICE RITUALS for fuck sake! See, this is a problem with our society. We are so focused on casting stones at Europeans, that we allow all the negatives of other individuals to fall by the wayside.
@RealTalk147 even the bloody sacrifices of the Aztecs did not match the Europeans in terms of sheer cruelty. As I said before, Bartolomeo de las Casas estimated more than 15 million Native American deaths up until 1542, way before the White Conquest of Native America even began. The Spaniards alone killed 15 million Natives in just 50 years and Las Casas was an eyewitness to this White barbarism, you cannot hurl at Las Casas the slanders you hurl at David Stannard
@ComradeFlorian31 If you believe that a war, straight up killing, is more cruel then a human sacrifice, you go right ahead. Look dude, I know what you're trying to do. You're trying to get a rise from me. You're trying to get my goat. You are a misguided dumbshit, Who only cites shit out of his ass that suits him. No fact that you can produce is relevant to me. You're just going to preach to me about the white people and how they did this, and how they did that...Whatever...
@RealTalk147 The Spaniards "took infants from their mother's breasts... and threw them into the rivers, roaring with laughter and saying as the babies fell into water- "Boil there you offspring of the devil". Other infants they put to the sword along with their mothers and anyone else who happened to be nearby. They made some wide gallows on which the hanged victims' feet almost touched the ground, stringing up the victims in lots of 13 in memory of uour Redeemer and His 12 Apostles then set
@ComradeFlorian31 "then set burning wood at their feet and thus burned them alive. To others they attached straw or wrapped their whole bodies in straw and set them afire. With still others, all those they wanted to capture alive, they cut off their hands and HUNG THEM ROUND THE VICTIM'S NECK, saying "Go now, carry the message, meaning "Take the news to the Indians who have fled to the mountains"
Source- Bartolomeo de las Casas- "Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indians"
@ComradeFlorian31 Man, those fearsome Aztecs were so civilized, they only cut out their victim's hearts, which meant instant death, which meant no suffering at all. Plus they only sacrificed braves, killing women and children was alien to them
@ComradeFlorian31 Well, that's a load of shit. Go check out the Indian American Wars. It clearly states that the Indians killed white women and children in one on one combat. Also, the Indians were spared by whites. This is not the case when the roles were reversed. Whites were slaughtered at the Roman Ruins in Colorado.
@RealTalk147 The White butchers didn't spare anyone. According to Las Casas, the Spaniards "took infants from their mother's breast... and threw them into the rivers, roaring with laughter and saying as the babies fell into water- "Boil there, you offspring of the devil... Other infants they put to the sword along with their mothers and anyone else who happened to be nearby"
Source- Bartolomeo de las Casas- "Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indies". Unlike you I always provide sources
@RealTalk147 the population of Hispaniola alone dropped from 3 million before Columbus to a mere 200 in 1542 according to the same Las Casas- Bartolomeo de las Casas- "Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indies"
@ComradeFlorian31 No, you don't get it. First of all, there were Indian tribes of different racial backgrounds when Columbus came over. Columbus' crew (around a couple thousand) were of different races. They relied on the natives to aid them, and overthrow the current government in South America. There is artefactual and scientific evidence that whites were here before the traditional Indians. So, I guess, who are you mad at, the whites? That's an easy one dude.
@ComradeFlorian31 The Indians call that a place of "evil spirits," only because they know who they slaughtered there. The only crime that the whites did at the Roman Ruins in Colorado, was trying to build a civilization there. The Indians saw this, wasn't pleased because they were territorial, and they are STILL territorial.
@ComradeFlorian31 They are just butthurt that we won the war, with our boomsticks the second time around. You can still try to think that the hollywood red indians that you are familiar with, are the original people here. Quite frankly, I don't really give a shit. But those red indians slaughtered a few white villages, to claim this land as their own. And there are doubt that they didn't do the same thing with the black olmecs in Mexico.
@ComradeFlorian31 Plus, have you ever had the privilege of going through the human sacrifices that the indians did to the whites? It's not as good as you so called think it is. It's almost like being disemboweled. Can't believe your sick ass is actually trying to defend a human sacrifice. You're creepy dude.
@ComradeFlorian31 Look, I don't have time for this history debating bullshit. I know that white people touched the US first. I just don't care. The red Indians are no longer targeted. And in fact, most are having 8 kids per couple. I'm more worried about the current genocide of my people, the Europeans. Don't you DARE talk to me about genocides! My people hold the record in number of genocides, and in numbers lost!
@RealTalk147 the "Boer Genocide"- 3000 White LANDLORDS killed by Blacks since 1994, compare this to the 3 million Blacks the Apartheid regime killed in South Africa, Namibia, Angola and Mozambique
@ComradeFlorian31 That was NOT a genocide. It was a war and the butthurt indians lost!! Nowadays they're all a bunch of alchoholics drinking themselves to death. Not too mewntion for years the whites and indians lived side by side together with no issues until the whites wanted to evolve into the modern world and the indians didn't. Lets not forget to mention the fact that the savage indians have slaughtered ENTIRE villages of white people then scalped them!!!!!!
All I have to say is if Native Indian's don't believe they are Clovis/Solutrean why did they claim the bones as one of there people and take them so they couldnt be studied any further,because maybe DNA science is right,DNA DON"T LIE!
I don't see a controversy. Does it really matter what ancient people were here first or how they got here? It's in indeed interesting but it does not change anything. No human lineage is superior to another and each contributes to the strength of the whole of humanity in their own way. What is known is the way the Euros later came to this continent and their manifest destiny religious philosophy which lead them to do more than colonize and explore but conquer and displace nations.
So Kennewick man turns out to be «non-Native American». He could have been a voyager who discovered new land he later died on. Or, if he were part of a long lineage of whatever origin which became «native to the Americas», it doesn't change the fact that for all intents and purposes, survivors of history called «Native Americans» today are as native as Americans will ever get from now on, in every way that actually matters, with very urgent political issues to consider.
Bullshit, ethnocentric bullshit, white people trying to justify the holocaust against my people! Trying to justify colonialism, why does it always involve race or race superiority? What the fuck are they trying to prove?
@nino17azteca they're not trying to justify anything. it's proof that Indians aren't really "Native" Americans. the scientific evidence here proves it.
@michaelzwarszawy The first Americans were Europeans who came over following the ice shelf that covered the northern hemisphere. Indians did not arrive until much later and apparently killed the white people out.
@theshow2k8 the problem is Native Americans often have prominent noses that are very Caucasoid-like clearly suggesting INTERMARRIAGE with these Kennewick "Whites", second the White Genocide of Native Americans is extremely well documented, starting with Las Casas himself- all White Nationalists have is a pile of bones that do NOT show any sign of violent death while opponents of you have more than 100 million Native corpses to show you whos' in the right and who in the wrong
@ComradeFlorian31 There was No genocide against American Indians, Most American Indians died from Migrating from Asia to America, Many others died from Disease, both ones brought with them from Asia, and ones brought by Europeans, the rest died in Battle during the Civil war supporting the Confederacy. There were never that many American Indians to begin with, the Pilgrims arrived in the United States in the 1600s, and outnumbered the American Indians by the early 1700s.
@lakewood425 Check Bartolomeo de las Casas- "Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indies", Ward Churchill- "Indians are Us", David Stannard- "The American Holocaust" etc and see for yourself how matters truly stand. In Guatemala and Brazil the Genocide continued well into the 20 th century with hundreds of thousands killed. I so wish that Native leaders such as Morales expropriated White Landlords more quickly so that America can be returned to its rightful owners
@ComradeFlorian31 (a) Whites have been in America just as long as the Asian Indians have. (b) show some respect, becuase whites have done far more for American than anyother race, Our goverenment, Our inventions and technology (television,car,computer), as far as I'm concearend these inventions are Ours, and if whites ever leave America you can bet we're taking them with us, we'll take all of Our inventions and leave America the way we found it, nothing but trees and beaver
@ComradeFlorian31 Genocide is the destruction of genes, not a massacre. I think you might have the two confussed. And we never breed with them. Europeans were disgusted by American Indians, and vise versa. Whites practicing genocide, or ethnic cleansing on the American Indians is nothing more than political correctness, Culture Marxism, and the infamous white guilt complex society loves to shove down Our throats every chance they get.
@ComradeFlorian31 Each race has different Bones, Skulls, DNA, Gene Lines (extending back to around 2 million B.C.), Heritage, Even IQ. All of these were how we know American Indians came from Asia. Europeans have had land stolen from us throught history - Egypt, Asia Minor, Babylon, you don't hear us complaining. Hell our land is being stolen today with Multicultralism, and Massive Immigration from Muslim, and African countries and yet we still don't complain.
@ComradeFlorian31 The proof of White Native Americans is the Hapoid X marker - found in Anchient American remains, It is Not found in todays American Indians, but todays Europeans (Whites). Stone tool technology of the Solutrean culture in prehistoric Europe is identical to the Clovis tool making culture in the Americans.
@ComradeFlorian31 There may not be any hard facts of The white Solutreans being wiped out by invading American Indians, and there probabley never will be as long as the crooked Marxist Government continues step in, and hide the truth. But there are stories - The Paiute's of Nevada hava a tale when their ancestors first arrived in America, they killed off the last of the "Red" Haired Giants by sufocating them in caves 15,000 yrs ago. The Aztecs have stories of them as well.
@323fugitive I don't think you have the right to judge a whole race. Like if you were black I wouldn't have the right to say that all blacks are murderers.
oh yea and there goes all the Scientists theory's about the world being 2,500 years old. Score one for Intelligence. Make up your damn minds. All men and women came from The Africa's believe it or not. Im italian and im not in denial.. We came from Jacob.. He created all whites we broke the rules and we were kicked out of the holy land to the WILDERNESS... Where Moses came and uplifted us from the Wilderness. Hints.... uplifted..... came from crawling to hunch back to walking perfectly...
@gangstastyle55 Wake up everyone. I'm white we just all need to know the truth! I'm 45 years old ive been studying history and Science for over 22 years. Believe all I tell you. There may have been whites in America then, CALLED Scandinavians a.k.a. VIKINGS. WAKE UP PEOPLE. Do research.
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!! Hahaha first White Settlers states the Humanity is 2,500 years old. Now it dates back to 25,000 BC. And even then The settlers in America HAD TO BE "EUROPEANS" Even when Europe had no existence then. Thats when the world was called Pengea I believe. So how do get French and Spainards???? I mean look at this mean, Who sees French??? Who sees any european in him.?? Western or Asian Skeletons... EXACTLY!!!
"But if the first Americans had drifted from Australia, where are their descendants now? Again, the skulls suggest an answer.
The shape of the skulls changes between 9,000 and 7,000 years ago from being exclusively negroid to exclusively mongoloid. Combined with rock art evidence of increasing violence at this time, it appears that the mongoloid people from the north invaded and wiped out the original Americans."
BBC NEWS Sci/Tech 'First Americans were Australian'
man all the blacks on youtube trying to revise history like they came from some dominant, creative super advanced race is funny as fuck. White history translates to white society's today.....the best in the world. Black history has not translated to shit, theres africans gettting high off of of sewage that some nice humanitarian group built for them right now.
"We Euros could have easily progressed on the same course without him, although, I do value his contributions."
It doesn't matter what date or time ... the fact is that these two guys havemade their contributions to the IT industry and there are many more who have patent numbers in their names.
Even your so called Newton or Galileo didn't just develop these concepts from the BLUE:)
My main point is that the HISTORY BOOKS should start portraying BLACK / YELLOW, BROWN ACHIEVEMENTS as well!!
@dogons2k12 Actually with Newton you might say he did develop it from the blue, if that story about the apple falling on his head is true. I agree about unbiasedness in the history books.
@WhiteWeasel420c Yes persians, ancient tajiks, amernians can certainly pass for south europeans. But the kurds, arabs, gypsies, kurds, pakistani, indians are all caucasian too. To be Honest, native americans are not really asian people, if you compare there genetic and traits are as different to asians, as europeans are different to other caucasians.
We don't know whole story, how many you think his people were killed.100,000 or perhaps 150,000? don't compare that to native american genocide.
@mongolANDtamerlane Yes there are four major Racial groups and one sub group. Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Negroid and Dravidian. And the Aborigine's of Australia and New Zeland are a sub-group.
Exactly...You don't KNOW how many of Kennewick man's people were killed by Native American Indians :)
Still don't get the point. Bottom line Kennewick is NOT caucasian. Looks and genetics are NOT the same thing. People can change their appearance when they are in the different environment. Like the indians/pakistani who became middle easterners, and from Middle easterners became white, thank you very much.
Native americans are proto-mongoloid people, like the southeast asians who became ancestors of east asians, as result of the ice age turning skin lighter, small eyes, shrinking their face.
white people are something else ... the KHOISAN ( oldest tribe on earth ) entered Europe only 35,000 years ago and he was BLACK.
If EUROPEANS only turned PALE WHITE about 5500 - 8000 years ago according to RUSSIAN SCIENTISTS how on earth could white people be in AMERICA 25,000 years ago?!?!!?!?!?!?
GOOGLE: European skin turns PALE white only recently
@WhiteWeasel420 Well think about it ... When white people came to the picture they had ZERO knowledge whatsoever!!!! So they went in search for knowledge wherever they could find it!!!! When they arrive in a new area they befriend the indigenous people just to stab them in the back after they gain the knowledge. Every where they went they repeated the same thing!!!!!
Now that is quite DUMB because at the end ALL colored people will turn against white people:)
@WhiteWeasel420 Ohhh spare me on your IGNORANCE!!!! The Dutch settlers arrived in 1606!! Two hundred years after BLACK MUSLIMS ruled and civilized Europe for almost 800 years .... Are you retarded?!!?
Just because you bring new technology or advanced technology to people who don't posses that technology doesn't make you SMARTER than them GENIUS!!!! Especially when you use that TECHNOLOGY to your advantage to subjugate the indigenous people who didn''t GIVE A FLYING F@#%$ about the "TECHNOLGY"!!
@dogons2k12 Not all Moors are Black. Berbers are Moors.
LOL..Look how hard are you grasping for something? ANYTHING to throw in my face right now?
Maybe you are right about the Moors I have no idea. The Moors are not doing anything significant NOW. even if they did everything you claim.
So...Your basic Theory is White people are the least advanced race, they have everything they do because they stole it from all the non white's and SOMEHOW left them incapable to re-create these things?
@WhiteWeasel420 "Not all Moors are Black. Berbers are Moors."
WRONG again!!! Modern berbers have nothing to do with the ancient berbers!! Most of the modern berbers you see today are helplessly mixed with ROMANS, GREEKS, MAMELUKS, CENTRAL ASIAN TURKS.
You cannot compare the modern population of Northern Africa to Ancient North Africa ... Are you serious!!
A little genetic research would reveal that the P2 gene pretty much clusters all AFRICANS on the continent together.
@dogons2k12 Do you desire an admission from me that you know more about the Moors than I? Alright, granted.
That being said though I must ask. Were the Dutch in Africa Justified in settling Africa as the Moors were justified in settling south Continental Europe? OR were they both wrong?
Or perhaps it's not an issue of Morality at all.Perhaps more advanced peoples will always occupy ,esser advanced peoples.
@WhiteWeasel420 IAGO "Even now, now, very now, an old black ram Is tupping your white ewe. Arise, arise; Awake the snorting citizens with the bell, Or else the devil will make a grand sire of you." Arise I say! (1.1.9)
DAMN DUDE!!! Even Shakespeare, author of OTHELLO THE MOOR OF VENICE knew his history and wasn't ashamed of it.
Show me a painting where OTHELLO is portrayed as WHITE or Middle Eastern?!?
-
THAT's right if there is then it might be a painted by the NAZI KKK
@WhiteWeasel420 "Japan stole a lot of Americas plans for Robotics and we still know how to manufacture Robotics" HAHAHA...
That's the problem with white people today!!! YOU RELY TOO MUCH ON FOX NEWS, HISTORY CHANNEL and other euroCENTRIC garbage. Pick up a REAL HISTORICAL BOOK and READ!!!!!
Don't you know that the ASIANS had one of the advanced navies and ancient artillery weapons in the world!!! DON't you KNOW THAT the CHINESE (1421 AD) & MALIANS (1311 AD) discovered AMERICA b4 COLUMBUS?!?
@dogons2k12 LOL You probably think that Fox, MSNBC and CNN aren't all the same crock of lies. No sir, I rely on International News sources. Asia Times is a favorite source. And you? You rely on WHOM for YOUR news?
Don't talk down to me kid, you will never hear me downplay the accomplishments of Asians. However, the Japanese DID get many of their Robotics from men like Nikola Tesla with the Radio controlled torpedo, or thecreation of Televox by Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
@WhiteWeasel420 I refer on international, AFRICAN & AFRICAN DIASPORA sources when it comes to AFRICAN HISTORY!!!!! AMERICAN HISTORY books is based on LIES upon LIES!!!!
Here is a source for you!!
-
"Morocco in the 17th century had a black king."
Ancient civilizations of Africa/ UNESCO International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General History of Africa; editor, G. Mokhtar (London; Heinemann Educational Books; Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981), 406
@dogons2k12 That being said however Japan is leading the way in Robotics today, despite WHERE they got the idea from or who did what first.
As a White Nationalist I hate nothing more then you sneaky little cowards trying to twist my statents to seem like I'm talking down to or insulting someone non-White....It shows you will stoop to any underhanded means to discredit me. It's extremely disgusting in my opinion.
The words MOOR, MAURETANIA, & MOROCCO comes from the Greek "MAUROS" which means BLACK.
Don't you know that Ethiopia is a STONE throw away from YEMEN where the moors came from?!?
"Many of the earliest Muslim converts were Africans, and a number of the Muslim faithful sought refuge in Ethiopia because of Arabian hostility to Muhammad's teachings"
Ivan Van Sertima - Golden Age of the Moor page 70.
Google: PHILIPPE EMEAGWALI - a Nigerian (Father of the internet) received in1989 Gordon Bell Prize.
Google: Mark Dean. He led the team that developed the ISA bus, and he led the design team responsible for creating the first one-gigahertz computer processor chip.[1] He holds three of IBM's original nine PC patents.
Now explain yourself when you say get of our computer .... Did you invent anything related to computers?!?!
@dogons2k12 The history of the Internet starts in the 1950s and 1960s. Mr. Emeagwali was born in 1954. He likely helped out a tad and had awards heaped on him for PC reasons. A valiant effort, but, I'm sure we could have done it without him. Again, with Mr. Dean, computer technology was already in motion in the 1950s. We Euros could have easily progressed on the same course without him, although, I do value his contributions.
@dogons2k12 So, this would be like if I made a ProTools rip-off, then edited some hip-hop songs, then called myself the Father of Hip-Hop. Jumping to PC conclusions. So Mr. Dean created the first one-giga chip. It's not like we wouldn't have done it anyway; he was just placed at the head of the team that was working with pre-existing technology (made by Whites). Peace:)
He was Polynesian/Ainu and DNA proved it. Not European so you guys are all euro-centric racist idiots.. The guy that assumed this made a comment that it had Caucasian features than it blew way out of proportion and went viral nation wide. Then they did a DNA test and found out he was genetically related to Polynesian/Ainu people. Quit living a fantasy and live by the truth.
Since young, without knowing anything about antropology, I always thought these pictures of indian chiefs showed aquiline noses and that its a tipical whites characteristic.
where was the Kenniwik man found? and if he is the oldest human specimen ever found it would be impossible to compare his facial features to that of other specimens because human physical features have changed quite a bit over thousands of years
@mendozazer "where was the Kenniwik man found?" Seriously? Is that a real question? Kennewick man was found in Kennewick, WA. If you would have actually listened to the narrator you would know that 2 men were taking a walk along the Columbia river in Kennewick, WA and "stumbled" across something up they thought was rock, which turned out to be a skull. If you can't even listen to the narrator then why should anyone count anything you question or say as credible?
HAHA that picture of the kennewick man remade face is OBVIOUSLY of siberian native american decent. the high cheeck nones and broad nose.. give me a break!
@catoplayboy How does DNA prove it wrong? The US government is covering up this whole thing because the "Indians" are scared of a little truth. Get over it, the "Indians" weren't the first people in America. The Incan mummies have RED hair. We were worshipped as gods.
@KnoxSUX Most South American tribes have stories of the white skinned gods with hair of gold. They always bring them sacred knowledge and mate with their women.
@WhiteWeasel420 There is no genetic evidence for that, kennewick man is related to ainu and jomon. These so called white skinned gods and golden hair are ALBINO'S go take a look at the albino south american indians.
@mongolANDtamerlane Go take a look at Albino South American Indians? LOLOL okay but what does that prove? Society's tend to look down on Albino's as different not "Special"
The skull sir :p The skull of Kennewick man is a Caucasian skull.
@mongolANDtamerlane Why do you people seem to think white's aren't cauvasians? :o
Either way, even If Kennewick man didn't use German technology...have a british accent...enjoy Italian food LOLOL He was STILL a Caucasian.
and the Bottom line STILL is that the Native Americans were not the first people and probably had something to do with Kennewick mans dissapearance..if ya get my drift LOL.
Persians ARE white. Anyone with white skin, blonde hair and blue eyes is white in my book.
@mongolANDtamerlane And even alot of the Ainu people strike me as White looking....Hell Japanese People in general, many look more "white" than Mongoloid to me.
@WhiteWeasel420 Accept ainu are white looking australoid who have NO genetic relation with europeans like the black australoids of black africans. Only 0000.1% japanese look white but hell many slanty eye white people strike me as asian looking. Hell even persian,indian,pakistani,arabs,north-africans look white with genetic mutation like albinism.We should include indian,pakistani, iraqi,osama binladin as white since the south asians and middle easterners are the ancestors of white race.
Here's how the Spanish Conquistadors behaved on the island of Hispaniola: "They attacked the towns and spared neither the children, nor the aged nor pregnant women nor women in childbed, not only stabbing them and dismembering them but cutting them to pieces as if dealing with sheep in the slaughter house...To others they attached straw or wrapped their whole bodies in straw and set them afire. With still others...they cut off their hands and hung them round the victim's neck" (Las Casas)
ComradeFlorian31 2 weeks ago
@Gentilejedi Shake your head all you want, but it's true. Nobody wants to wipe anyone off the map. Nice straw man.
M1NDC0N7R0L 3 weeks ago
LOL fake science is fun.
MrPa1310 3 weeks ago
@MrPa1310 it's fake? What do you mean?
phoenix3brian 2 weeks ago
...wish that was an Arabian skull...so it'll stop the argue 'coz everyone came from ADAM and he is an arabian.....
elzhivago 1 month ago
They find "One" skull and American Indians are wiped off the map.....shake my head.
Gentilejedi 1 month ago
bs.. false video.
Dramactica 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The funny thing is what happened to these White so called Native Americans is gonna happen again . Couse in Another 1000 Years there will be no whites in America Will all Be Looking like Native Americans again . VIVA LA RAZA ! LOL!!! SUCKERS
TheDEADBLOOM 1 month ago
He's over 9000!
sooprcool 1 month ago
The Olmec heads are purely Native in their facial features. The absence of curly hair aside, their nose, though flat, is not nearly as wide as the typical "Negroid"nose, the mouth, although full-lipped, is not nearly as wide and the eyes are not as large as the typical "Negroid"eyes. The way I see it they are much closer to depicting Ïndians"that they are to depicting "Negroids
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HIS-tory is a bunch of layered, lobby-ed lies. No one knows. I live in Northern California. A human thigh bone fragment, possibly as old as 2,500 years or more was found here in 1999. Artifacts have been found here that were carbon dated over 40,000 yrs ago. There, I just debunked the very beginning statement on this video.
meloearth 2 months ago in playlist More videos from TheFirstAmericans
Comment removed
meloearth 2 months ago in playlist More videos from TheFirstAmericans
The savages were the Whites who fed Native babies to thier dogs, and tested the sharpness of thier swords by cutting people in half. If not for the Natives who taught the whites (who were resorting to cannibalism) to survive off of the land (think Thanksgiving), they would not have made it through the winters. The scalping actually came from the British who paid money per indian scalps.Not all Natives abuse alcohol, that's just an ignorant myth. We are survivors and we're educating ourselves
lorena509 2 months ago in playlist More videos from TheFirstAmericans
The subtitle at the end of the video is misleading. -- Here is a quote from the National Park Service:
"We were unable to obtain reliable ancient DNA amplification results from the Kennewick samples. This means that either (1) no original DNA was preserved in the bone samples transferred to our laboratory, or (2) original DNA was preserved in the bone samples but we were unable to extract it."
Doesn't mean it WILL NEVER happen, but they were unable to at this point.
Inari1987 2 months ago 2
From Burke Museum:
"Some anthropologists have noted that the narrow, elongated skull shape of Kennewick Man — and other features traditionally called "Caucasoid" — are shared by several early populations in Asia and the Pacific. Based on this information, many scholars believe that it would be "far-fetched" at this point to suggest that Kennewick Man came from Europe."
We don't need any theory of European ancestory to explain Kennewick man. Beringia is sufficient.
Inari1987 2 months ago 9
@Inari1987 You're 100% WRONG. First, everyone denied that America was settled by non-Indians. But, once the evidence was indisputable; people suddenly claimed that it was probably Chinese or Japanese Inu. Yup, they tried to claim it was anyone except for Europeans. Now, what about Ice Age Columbus? THey came to America (Virginia) 10,000 years earlier than Kennewick. This could explain the migration pattern. Now, why the hell are Jews so interested in this subject?
TheGameLord7 1 month ago in playlist White People Settled U.S.A., thousands of years ago
@TheGameLord7 This really begs the question as to why we do not see this in the DNA which indicates no such European migration, not to mention no Jewish Migration.
Inari1987 1 month ago
@Inari1987 Okay, let's play the cards backward. There is evidence of peoples inhabiting North America thousands of years ago who were NOT "Native American Indian". (2), the Virginia migration was DEFINITELY older than the Washington State migration. (3) There was DEFINITELY warfare and genocide committed by the American Indians. (4) The Thumbs-up received by your comments were artificially tabulated. I'm not sure by whom. But it was not natural. So, that's very strange.
TheGameLord7 1 month ago
@TheGameLord7 The reason the evidence in Virginia is older is for two reasons: 1) The Ice Glaciars during the last Ice Age covered much more of the western part of the continent, so the peoples migrated AROUND the ice sheets and Virginia was exposed at that time. Also, we know now that the Indians would have migrated on the VERY fringe of the American continent that was exposed at the time, but now under the pacific ocean. Again, a huge chunk of the west was covered by glaciars, so we should not
Inari1987 1 month ago
Comment removed
Inari1987 1 month ago
@Inari1987 even expect to find the evidence in areas that would have been uninhabitable. ---As for the question of genicide....I fail to even see why you have even brought that up.
Inari1987 1 month ago
@Inari1987 Your previous comment was untrue. and, you know it. The Virginia Evidence is dated Circa 17,000 B.C. While the Kennewick remains are almost 10,000 years younger. The Oldest evidence apparently comes from the east. Also, you also know that your people denied ANY evidence of these anomalies. Now, you're fixed upon making some sort of explanation. And, I mentioned previous genocides because it reminds us that white people are not the evil villains which we are portrayed
TheGameLord7 1 month ago
@TheGameLord7 I know how old Kennewick Mann is, and I know the archeology well (I am working on my degree in Native American history, after all). And no, I am not making up any of the explanation. It is widely accepted. When you talk about the Virginian evidence, you are talking about spear points found there; I do not deny that exists. It is perfectly explainable since the coastal rout (not the usual corridor through Alaska and the Yukon) also was accesible 17,000 years ago, at
Inari1987 1 month ago
@Inari1987 just the right time that you point out. (There is also evidence that humans had reached the Americas 50,000 years ago, but that is still in question.) -- No one here is saying that Indians were incapable of cruelty or that whites were inherently evil. I fail to see why you are even making that an issue.
Inari1987 1 month ago
@Inari1987 For a basic view of the typical archeological view of how and when the first inhabitents came to America, I would recommend you to watch the BBC's "The Incredible Human Journey: America" which is actually available on YouTube. I'll give the link to the first part:
Link: watch?v=SNsIKPUQUGY
Inari1987 1 month ago
@Inari1987 and there is still no evidence for a supposed "Indian" Genocide against Kennewicks. The WHITE Genocide against Native Americans however is both well documented and huge- 15 million Native deaths between 1492-1542 according to Bartolomeo de las Casas and 100 million Native deaths between 1492-1890 according to David Stannard. The slaughter of Natives continued well into the 20 century in Argentina, Brazil and especially Guatemala
ComradeFlorian31 1 month ago 2
@ComradeFlorian31 True, that evidence does not exist, and certainly not archeologically..and an ancient mass genocide would leave an abundance of archeological evidence. --Thanks for mentioning Stannard. His book is highly recommended. Anyone with an honest desire to learn about Euro-Genocide against the Native peoples of America would do well to read it.
Inari1987 1 month ago
From Burke Museum:
"Some anthropologists have noted that the narrow, elongated skull shape of Kennewick Man — and other features traditionally called "Caucasoid" — are shared by several early populations in Asia and the Pacific. Based on this information, many scholars believe that it would be "far-fetched" at this point to suggest that Kennewick Man came from Europe."
We don't need any theory of European ancestor to explain Kennewick man. Beringia is sufficient..
Inari1987 2 months ago
Wasn't Arlington Springs Woman found to have lived 13,000 years ago, much earlier than Kennewick Man? And to my knowledge, scientists were not able to retrieve DNA from Kennewick Man.
Vodouful 2 months ago
@Vodouful They did, but it was inconclusive.
Inari1987 2 months ago
First there is NO evidence whatsoever that Kennewick People were "genocided" by "Indians" as some White Nationalits allege. Whereas the WHITE Genocide of Native Americans is both well documented and HUGE- something like 100 million Native deaths in 4 centuries according to Davod Stannard. "Indians" and Kennewicks could simply have INTERBRED hence the large proportion of Native Americans with prominent Caucasoid-like noses. Sorry but White Nationalism still has NOTHING in his defence
ComradeFlorian31 3 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@ComradeFlorian31 You seem to have no evidence either gj libtard.
Roflmfaoftw 3 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 The evidence is basically the shape of the skull.. The problem is that determining race by skull shape is not even an exact science. So this may not even be European at all.
Inari1987 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31
For a start the Native Americans themselves have tales of the whites they killed and the remains of these whites is proof enough.As for whites killing Native Americans.....sorry,but most Natives were killing themselves off and disease was also a major factor so no,it is not well documented that whites committed genocide against these so called ''Native Americans''.
theshow2k8 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Then where the fuck did they go? They're not here anymore! And stop with the trying to run around the conversation with the white nationalism bullshit. It's only going to encourager the people to study harder. And Kennewick Man was killed by "Native" Americans, by a tribe in the Pacific Northwest. He was a white man, that was persecuted by the color of his skin. The irony.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Just because they aren't here anymore, doesn't mean they never existed. How the heck can you still be around when the invaders didn't want it to happen? Do you accuse the owners involved in a home invasion, to never have existed, if the criminal kills them both? Of course not, that would be silly. Besides, you better lighten up on this whole EVERY Indian tribe came from Asia thing. That's also utter bullshit. Some were Jews, Blacks, and Whites.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 How much more modern human bones and other scientific evidence of Whites and Blacks being here before Indians has to be discovered, until you remove your head out of your tight little ass? I'm starting to believe...sadly...none. And you'll spend the rest of your life ducking and dodging, cause that's all that's left.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 And don't get me started with the Olmec thing. There is a decent chance of them being black. The reason I have, is that, the Indian lovers are going to tell me that they came from Alaska. Okay, went through Alaska (No Civilization), went through Canada (No Civilization), went through the ENTIRE United States (No Civilization), and FINALLY said, "Okay men, this looks like a good place to begin our Indian Civilization!" Right next to the Gulf of Mexico...hmm...
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 You keep fighting the truth. It's ALL you Indian Invaders HAVE! The Black and White communities our waking up. We are SICK of your bitching! And finally we have proof to shut you up once and for all! The time will come when the bitching will finally seize, and we can ALL get some peace and quiet. Not only are you guys not "Native," but you're the furthest from it! You guys made your arrival dead last!
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Besides, you guys talk like the New World is somehow your motherland or something. It never was. That's another myth. You guys come from Asia. Which your ancestors probably stole from Europeans, as evident in the White cemetery recently discovered in China.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 And that number is grossly exaggerated by you and your butt buddy David Stannard. The number is way too high, cause I believe that would have been the ENTIRE Indians at ANY TIME in AMERICA! People say that there was a few million Indians here (Im going with just in the United States) and the number dropped to like 250000. Give or take that's about 89750000 more. Unless Latin and South America had way more. You know how many babies a couple would have produced?
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Plus, he sounds pretty phoney and an agitator. That is a HUGE assumption to make, when the highest number I have seen is 15 million in the time of the occupation. Besides, why the FUCK do I care? Why am I even focusing on that number. My team (Europeans) won the war. We kick ass. I'm going to start having more pride in the battles and wars that we have fought and won for now on.I'm SO sick of listening to the losers bitch. ALL RACES have experienced GENOCIDE!
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 ALL RACES have experienced land conquering, you freckin' moron! Asia is taking Tibet as we speak. Great Britain tried to get Scotland. Celts lost Spain, Babylonia lost to Israel. Africa JUST lost Egypt and Libya. Hitler tried to capture Europe, but was stopped by the Soviet Union, who then tried to get Eastern Europe, but lost to now Russia. Muslims tried to take Europe and was stopped by the Crusades.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Europe has actually had to defend their homeland more times then any other nation. And does that make it on the news, no. You know why, because Europeans don't bitch. It's not in our blood. We're warriors and we will fight in battles, no matter how brutal! Then, we will fight each other in Civil War. We will fight on your shore or ours! Bravery be thy name, and the wisdom be my might! You just don't have any idea how much this country and the world may need us
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Besides, the Olmecs, who were black Africans, lost Mexico to the Indians from Asia. *Claps* Congratulations dude, you get the hypocrisy award of the night. Besides, no telling how many of your ancestors slaughtered people who were here originally. Just because we don't know the numbers doesn't mean it isn't there. They had to do something to take down a civilization like the Olmecs. Didn't they? Gonna tell me that the Olmecs didn't believe in kids?
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@RealTalk147 Olmecs are never depicted with curly African-like hair. Also thick lips are fairly common among certain Native American tribes, they are by no means indictive of an African ancestry. Stannard didnțt exxagerate anything all right, he speaks the truth and numbers do add up. Bartolomeo de las Casas estimated 3 million Natives in tiny Hispaniola ALONE before Columbus and 15 million Native deaths throughout Spanish-occupied America in 50 years ALONE so the 100 million figure makes sense
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Okay, 15 + 3 = 100? Again, how many Indians would that make, a lot. Also, I don't study mesoamerica stuff that much, but I do know that the moors helped out the spanish people kill the people down there. And also, speaking of hairs, have you seen The Monkey statue of the Olmec? Now if that ain't an afro, then I don't know what is.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@RealTalk147 3 million Natives in Hispaniola before Columbus according to Las Casas, 15 million Native deaths troughout America between 1492-1542 according to Las Casas and 100 million Native deaths troughout America between 1492-1890 according to David Stannard, see how the numbers DO add up? As for Olmec art I'm quite familiar with it but since you brought this Monkey Statue up I''ll give it a look
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 It only adds up if you click your heels. I mean, Jesus, do you know Comrade that I saw a person on here that believes there is still genocide going on towards the Indians today? 2011? We can't beat something if reality doesn't matter anymore. I will begin to believe in Bigfoot for now on. Plus, just like the original Holocaust, this POS doesn't want to say that it wasn't just Indians from Asia. Also Whites and Blacks were killed.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Its Jews ONLY got killed all over again. I don't trust anyone who uses the term "Holocaust" anymore. Does he say that in his book? That there were many Black, White, and Jewish Indian tribes here when Columbus arrived? The Olmec Art has full and goatee breads on some for CHRIST SAKES! People say that this facial hair was common among Europeans. Either Columbus' team killed these people, or the Indians from Asia did.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 There is a Roman Ruins in Colorado that the ASIAN Indians won't touch and go on, because it has "evil spirits." Why you think that? Because there use to live White people there. Come on man!!! They didn't even have a chance to use the civilization that they built for themselves, cause they ALL got slaughtered by the Indians. The Indians know who was THERE! They know that they killed all those White people there. Just like they did with the Black Olmecs.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 So, I guess my question is, who are you sad for when it comes to the Indians? Are you mad for the Jewish Cherokee? You upset for the White Indians in the Northeast? You sad for the Black Indian tribes in Mexico? You outraged for all Racial Indian groups, or just the red ones who came from Asia? That's selective outrage, which means your outrage is shit!
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@RealTalk147 not allNative Americans share the sameskin colour,not all Native Americans share the same nose or lips or type of hair etc- that of course does not mean that Reds killed Whites and Blacks.I have googled that Olmec Monkey God of yours and all could find was a picture of a monkey-human hybrid with NO TRACE of African hair! That's all I could find sadly
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 The statue clearly shows an African more than it shows a red Indian though. That's all I'm saying. What does it show MORE of? Really look at it. Those lips, that Afro looking head! And yes, I do know that the red Indians slaughtered my ancestors at the Roman Ruins in Colorado, because those are the ones who talk about it. Their parents told the current generation all about it. And then they call it a place of "evil spirits." Sick!
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@RealTalk147: You speak as if only one type of "red Indians" existed while I have already said Native American peoples VARY in their physical features to a considerable extent, some of them are lighter some of them are darker, some of them feature hooked noses other feature flat ones, some of them have Asian-like eyes others show no trace of the Asian eye-fold. These features may have been evolved independetnly or through admixure but theres still NO evidence of large scale killing of Kenewicks
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 and even if there were evidence for Indian-Kennewick wars, there is still no evidence for an Indian Genocide against Kennewicks. Most "Indian" tribes that were studied by Europeans used to ADOPT members of the defeated tribes rather than slaughtering them Old Testament-style. More advanced Native tribes used to sacrifice prisoners of wars but this could certainly not have been the case with the "Indian" contemporaries of the Kennewick man
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 You kinda sound like you're in denial of how vicious these red Indians can be. Look, there is a reason why they were called savages, right. Historians looked at their rap sheet, and was like, "Holy shit, these were savages!" I mean, they did HUMAN SACRIFICE RITUALS for fuck sake! See, this is a problem with our society. We are so focused on casting stones at Europeans, that we allow all the negatives of other individuals to fall by the wayside.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@RealTalk147 even the bloody sacrifices of the Aztecs did not match the Europeans in terms of sheer cruelty. As I said before, Bartolomeo de las Casas estimated more than 15 million Native American deaths up until 1542, way before the White Conquest of Native America even began. The Spaniards alone killed 15 million Natives in just 50 years and Las Casas was an eyewitness to this White barbarism, you cannot hurl at Las Casas the slanders you hurl at David Stannard
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 White Conquest of North America I meant
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 If you believe that a war, straight up killing, is more cruel then a human sacrifice, you go right ahead. Look dude, I know what you're trying to do. You're trying to get a rise from me. You're trying to get my goat. You are a misguided dumbshit, Who only cites shit out of his ass that suits him. No fact that you can produce is relevant to me. You're just going to preach to me about the white people and how they did this, and how they did that...Whatever...
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@RealTalk147 The Spaniards "took infants from their mother's breasts... and threw them into the rivers, roaring with laughter and saying as the babies fell into water- "Boil there you offspring of the devil". Other infants they put to the sword along with their mothers and anyone else who happened to be nearby. They made some wide gallows on which the hanged victims' feet almost touched the ground, stringing up the victims in lots of 13 in memory of uour Redeemer and His 12 Apostles then set
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 "then set burning wood at their feet and thus burned them alive. To others they attached straw or wrapped their whole bodies in straw and set them afire. With still others, all those they wanted to capture alive, they cut off their hands and HUNG THEM ROUND THE VICTIM'S NECK, saying "Go now, carry the message, meaning "Take the news to the Indians who have fled to the mountains"
Source- Bartolomeo de las Casas- "Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indians"
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Man, those fearsome Aztecs were so civilized, they only cut out their victim's hearts, which meant instant death, which meant no suffering at all. Plus they only sacrificed braves, killing women and children was alien to them
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Well, that's a load of shit. Go check out the Indian American Wars. It clearly states that the Indians killed white women and children in one on one combat. Also, the Indians were spared by whites. This is not the case when the roles were reversed. Whites were slaughtered at the Roman Ruins in Colorado.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@RealTalk147 The White butchers didn't spare anyone. According to Las Casas, the Spaniards "took infants from their mother's breast... and threw them into the rivers, roaring with laughter and saying as the babies fell into water- "Boil there, you offspring of the devil... Other infants they put to the sword along with their mothers and anyone else who happened to be nearby"
Source- Bartolomeo de las Casas- "Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indies". Unlike you I always provide sources
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 If they didn't spare anyone...then why do I hear people bitching today?
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@RealTalk147 the population of Hispaniola alone dropped from 3 million before Columbus to a mere 200 in 1542 according to the same Las Casas- Bartolomeo de las Casas- "Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indies"
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 No, you don't get it. First of all, there were Indian tribes of different racial backgrounds when Columbus came over. Columbus' crew (around a couple thousand) were of different races. They relied on the natives to aid them, and overthrow the current government in South America. There is artefactual and scientific evidence that whites were here before the traditional Indians. So, I guess, who are you mad at, the whites? That's an easy one dude.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@RealTalk147 source please? i always provide sources when claiming anything
ComradeFlorian31 1 month ago
@ComradeFlorian31 The Indians call that a place of "evil spirits," only because they know who they slaughtered there. The only crime that the whites did at the Roman Ruins in Colorado, was trying to build a civilization there. The Indians saw this, wasn't pleased because they were territorial, and they are STILL territorial.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 They are just butthurt that we won the war, with our boomsticks the second time around. You can still try to think that the hollywood red indians that you are familiar with, are the original people here. Quite frankly, I don't really give a shit. But those red indians slaughtered a few white villages, to claim this land as their own. And there are doubt that they didn't do the same thing with the black olmecs in Mexico.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Plus, have you ever had the privilege of going through the human sacrifices that the indians did to the whites? It's not as good as you so called think it is. It's almost like being disemboweled. Can't believe your sick ass is actually trying to defend a human sacrifice. You're creepy dude.
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Look, I don't have time for this history debating bullshit. I know that white people touched the US first. I just don't care. The red Indians are no longer targeted. And in fact, most are having 8 kids per couple. I'm more worried about the current genocide of my people, the Europeans. Don't you DARE talk to me about genocides! My people hold the record in number of genocides, and in numbers lost!
RealTalk147 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 I bet you didn't even know about the genocide of whites in South Africa, huh? YOU WILL NEVER DEFEAT OUR LEGACY!
RealTalk147 2 months ago 2
@RealTalk147 the "Boer Genocide"- 3000 White LANDLORDS killed by Blacks since 1994, compare this to the 3 million Blacks the Apartheid regime killed in South Africa, Namibia, Angola and Mozambique
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 That was NOT a genocide. It was a war and the butthurt indians lost!! Nowadays they're all a bunch of alchoholics drinking themselves to death. Not too mewntion for years the whites and indians lived side by side together with no issues until the whites wanted to evolve into the modern world and the indians didn't. Lets not forget to mention the fact that the savage indians have slaughtered ENTIRE villages of white people then scalped them!!!!!!
End of Story.
ProTuner06 2 months ago
All I have to say is if Native Indian's don't believe they are Clovis/Solutrean why did they claim the bones as one of there people and take them so they couldnt be studied any further,because maybe DNA science is right,DNA DON"T LIE!
ATNAU 3 months ago
I don't see a controversy. Does it really matter what ancient people were here first or how they got here? It's in indeed interesting but it does not change anything. No human lineage is superior to another and each contributes to the strength of the whole of humanity in their own way. What is known is the way the Euros later came to this continent and their manifest destiny religious philosophy which lead them to do more than colonize and explore but conquer and displace nations.
wbworkout 3 months ago
Comment removed
DOUGHMANNETWURK 3 months ago
@DOUGHMANNETWURK You're stupid.... Archeologists want to understand the past, not change it.
thefedexpope 3 months ago
So Kennewick man turns out to be «non-Native American». He could have been a voyager who discovered new land he later died on. Or, if he were part of a long lineage of whatever origin which became «native to the Americas», it doesn't change the fact that for all intents and purposes, survivors of history called «Native Americans» today are as native as Americans will ever get from now on, in every way that actually matters, with very urgent political issues to consider.
fuschiadea 3 months ago
Comment removed
fuschiadea 3 months ago
Comment removed
fuschiadea 3 months ago
Comment removed
fuschiadea 3 months ago
Comment removed
Luigi84289 3 months ago
Very, very interesting find.
brandonjsmith1994 3 months ago
Bullshit, ethnocentric bullshit, white people trying to justify the holocaust against my people! Trying to justify colonialism, why does it always involve race or race superiority? What the fuck are they trying to prove?
nino17azteca 3 months ago
@nino17azteca they're not trying to justify anything. it's proof that Indians aren't really "Native" Americans. the scientific evidence here proves it.
michaelzwarszawy 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@michaelzwarszawy The first Americans were Europeans who came over following the ice shelf that covered the northern hemisphere. Indians did not arrive until much later and apparently killed the white people out.
Luigi84289 3 months ago
@michaelzwarszawy Skull shape is not an exact science, so it proves nothing.
Inari1987 2 months ago
@Inari1987
Skull shape is a scientific way of finding a out a race and its also the easiest way of finding out which race the skull belongs to without tests.
theshow2k8 2 months ago
@theshow2k8 the problem is Native Americans often have prominent noses that are very Caucasoid-like clearly suggesting INTERMARRIAGE with these Kennewick "Whites", second the White Genocide of Native Americans is extremely well documented, starting with Las Casas himself- all White Nationalists have is a pile of bones that do NOT show any sign of violent death while opponents of you have more than 100 million Native corpses to show you whos' in the right and who in the wrong
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 There was No genocide against American Indians, Most American Indians died from Migrating from Asia to America, Many others died from Disease, both ones brought with them from Asia, and ones brought by Europeans, the rest died in Battle during the Civil war supporting the Confederacy. There were never that many American Indians to begin with, the Pilgrims arrived in the United States in the 1600s, and outnumbered the American Indians by the early 1700s.
lakewood425 2 months ago
@lakewood425 Check Bartolomeo de las Casas- "Brief Account of the Devastation of the Indies", Ward Churchill- "Indians are Us", David Stannard- "The American Holocaust" etc and see for yourself how matters truly stand. In Guatemala and Brazil the Genocide continued well into the 20 th century with hundreds of thousands killed. I so wish that Native leaders such as Morales expropriated White Landlords more quickly so that America can be returned to its rightful owners
ComradeFlorian31 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 (a) Whites have been in America just as long as the Asian Indians have. (b) show some respect, becuase whites have done far more for American than anyother race, Our goverenment, Our inventions and technology (television,car,computer), as far as I'm concearend these inventions are Ours, and if whites ever leave America you can bet we're taking them with us, we'll take all of Our inventions and leave America the way we found it, nothing but trees and beaver
lakewood425 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Genocide is the destruction of genes, not a massacre. I think you might have the two confussed. And we never breed with them. Europeans were disgusted by American Indians, and vise versa. Whites practicing genocide, or ethnic cleansing on the American Indians is nothing more than political correctness, Culture Marxism, and the infamous white guilt complex society loves to shove down Our throats every chance they get.
lakewood425 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 Each race has different Bones, Skulls, DNA, Gene Lines (extending back to around 2 million B.C.), Heritage, Even IQ. All of these were how we know American Indians came from Asia. Europeans have had land stolen from us throught history - Egypt, Asia Minor, Babylon, you don't hear us complaining. Hell our land is being stolen today with Multicultralism, and Massive Immigration from Muslim, and African countries and yet we still don't complain.
lakewood425 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 The proof of White Native Americans is the Hapoid X marker - found in Anchient American remains, It is Not found in todays American Indians, but todays Europeans (Whites). Stone tool technology of the Solutrean culture in prehistoric Europe is identical to the Clovis tool making culture in the Americans.
lakewood425 2 months ago
@ComradeFlorian31 There may not be any hard facts of The white Solutreans being wiped out by invading American Indians, and there probabley never will be as long as the crooked Marxist Government continues step in, and hide the truth. But there are stories - The Paiute's of Nevada hava a tale when their ancestors first arrived in America, they killed off the last of the "Red" Haired Giants by sufocating them in caves 15,000 yrs ago. The Aztecs have stories of them as well.
lakewood425 2 months ago
Comment removed
Luigi84289 3 months ago
Whites are liars, exactly like George bush.
323fugitive 4 months ago
@323fugitive I don't think you have the right to judge a whole race. Like if you were black I wouldn't have the right to say that all blacks are murderers.
stickmedia1 4 months ago
@323fugitive
Maybe, but the important thing is that you don't stereotype.
mapscannotcontainme 3 months ago
@323fugitive And blacks are liars and lations are liars....so shutup you racist.
thefedexpope 3 months ago
...remember The Pilt-Down Man? The white man is the devil, this devil is and has always been a liar.
josephortizgarcia 4 months ago
oh yea and there goes all the Scientists theory's about the world being 2,500 years old. Score one for Intelligence. Make up your damn minds. All men and women came from The Africa's believe it or not. Im italian and im not in denial.. We came from Jacob.. He created all whites we broke the rules and we were kicked out of the holy land to the WILDERNESS... Where Moses came and uplifted us from the Wilderness. Hints.... uplifted..... came from crawling to hunch back to walking perfectly...
gangstastyle55 4 months ago
@gangstastyle55 Wake up everyone. I'm white we just all need to know the truth! I'm 45 years old ive been studying history and Science for over 22 years. Believe all I tell you. There may have been whites in America then, CALLED Scandinavians a.k.a. VIKINGS. WAKE UP PEOPLE. Do research.
gangstastyle55 4 months ago
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!! Hahaha first White Settlers states the Humanity is 2,500 years old. Now it dates back to 25,000 BC. And even then The settlers in America HAD TO BE "EUROPEANS" Even when Europe had no existence then. Thats when the world was called Pengea I believe. So how do get French and Spainards???? I mean look at this mean, Who sees French??? Who sees any european in him.?? Western or Asian Skeletons... EXACTLY!!!
gangstastyle55 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Свака част за видеo.
Ово би требало да се преведе на Српски језик и да се стави титл да се не би више људи поводили за комунистичко титоистичким лажима.
trnjana 4 months ago
"But if the first Americans had drifted from Australia, where are their descendants now? Again, the skulls suggest an answer.
The shape of the skulls changes between 9,000 and 7,000 years ago from being exclusively negroid to exclusively mongoloid. Combined with rock art evidence of increasing violence at this time, it appears that the mongoloid people from the north invaded and wiped out the original Americans."
BBC NEWS Sci/Tech 'First Americans were Australian'
HAHAHAHA .... LYING F@#%
dogons2k12 4 months ago
man all the blacks on youtube trying to revise history like they came from some dominant, creative super advanced race is funny as fuck. White history translates to white society's today.....the best in the world. Black history has not translated to shit, theres africans gettting high off of of sewage that some nice humanitarian group built for them right now.
MalfoyHatesIslam 4 months ago
You guys want to hear a joke?........Black history ahahahah
MalfoyHatesIslam 4 months ago
"We Euros could have easily progressed on the same course without him, although, I do value his contributions."
It doesn't matter what date or time ... the fact is that these two guys havemade their contributions to the IT industry and there are many more who have patent numbers in their names.
Even your so called Newton or Galileo didn't just develop these concepts from the BLUE:)
My main point is that the HISTORY BOOKS should start portraying BLACK / YELLOW, BROWN ACHIEVEMENTS as well!!
dogons2k12 5 months ago
@dogons2k12 Actually with Newton you might say he did develop it from the blue, if that story about the apple falling on his head is true. I agree about unbiasedness in the history books.
WhatsReallyGoingOn84 4 months ago
white people want EVERYTHING damn!!!
FLATFEET3 5 months ago
@FLATFEET3 If by "EVERYTHING" you mean for scientific truth to be examined, then, yes.
WhatsReallyGoingOn84 5 months ago
@WhiteWeasel420c Yes persians, ancient tajiks, amernians can certainly pass for south europeans. But the kurds, arabs, gypsies, kurds, pakistani, indians are all caucasian too. To be Honest, native americans are not really asian people, if you compare there genetic and traits are as different to asians, as europeans are different to other caucasians.
We don't know whole story, how many you think his people were killed.100,000 or perhaps 150,000? don't compare that to native american genocide.
mongolANDtamerlane 5 months ago
@mongolANDtamerlane Yes there are four major Racial groups and one sub group. Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Negroid and Dravidian. And the Aborigine's of Australia and New Zeland are a sub-group.
Exactly...You don't KNOW how many of Kennewick man's people were killed by Native American Indians :)
We do not YET have substantial research done.
WhiteWeasel420 5 months ago
Comment removed
mongolANDtamerlane 5 months ago
Still don't get the point. Bottom line Kennewick is NOT caucasian. Looks and genetics are NOT the same thing. People can change their appearance when they are in the different environment. Like the indians/pakistani who became middle easterners, and from Middle easterners became white, thank you very much.
Native americans are proto-mongoloid people, like the southeast asians who became ancestors of east asians, as result of the ice age turning skin lighter, small eyes, shrinking their face.
mongolANDtamerlane 5 months ago
HAHAHAHAHHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAHHAA
white people are something else ... the KHOISAN ( oldest tribe on earth ) entered Europe only 35,000 years ago and he was BLACK.
If EUROPEANS only turned PALE WHITE about 5500 - 8000 years ago according to RUSSIAN SCIENTISTS how on earth could white people be in AMERICA 25,000 years ago?!?!!?!?!?!?
GOOGLE: European skin turns PALE white only recently
HAHAHAHAHAA
WHAT a FUCKING JOKE!!!!!
dogons2k12 5 months ago
@dogons2k12 White people are the newest race on earth and yet we are the most advanced in such a short amount of time :O
Wooooooow white people are cool!
WhiteWeasel420 5 months ago
@WhiteWeasel420 Well think about it ... When white people came to the picture they had ZERO knowledge whatsoever!!!! So they went in search for knowledge wherever they could find it!!!! When they arrive in a new area they befriend the indigenous people just to stab them in the back after they gain the knowledge. Every where they went they repeated the same thing!!!!!
Now that is quite DUMB because at the end ALL colored people will turn against white people:)
dogons2k12 5 months ago
@dogons2k12 Soooo White people stole all their knowledge from Non Whites and left them incapable of re-discovering this knowledge?
No offense but that's completely fucking Retarded LOLOLOL
White prisoners left In Australia created a civilization in a few decades. They steal THAT knowledge from the Aborigine's too? ;)
Japan stole a lot of Americas plans for Robotics and we still know how to manufacture Robotics...I'm confused...LOL
WhiteWeasel420 5 months ago
@WhiteWeasel420 Ohhh spare me on your IGNORANCE!!!! The Dutch settlers arrived in 1606!! Two hundred years after BLACK MUSLIMS ruled and civilized Europe for almost 800 years .... Are you retarded?!!?
Just because you bring new technology or advanced technology to people who don't posses that technology doesn't make you SMARTER than them GENIUS!!!! Especially when you use that TECHNOLOGY to your advantage to subjugate the indigenous people who didn''t GIVE A FLYING F@#%$ about the "TECHNOLGY"!!
dogons2k12 5 months ago
@dogons2k12 Moors were not "Black Muslims".
WhiteWeasel420 5 months ago
@WhiteWeasel420 "Moors were not "BLACK MUSLIMS"
any sources to this WISHFUL fantasy?!?!?
So you claim you are well learned in international information?!?! Well check out the definition and origin of MOORS would you!!!!
dogons2k12 5 months ago
@dogons2k12 Not all Moors are Black. Berbers are Moors.
LOL..Look how hard are you grasping for something? ANYTHING to throw in my face right now?
Maybe you are right about the Moors I have no idea. The Moors are not doing anything significant NOW. even if they did everything you claim.
So...Your basic Theory is White people are the least advanced race, they have everything they do because they stole it from all the non white's and SOMEHOW left them incapable to re-create these things?
WhiteWeasel420 5 months ago
@WhiteWeasel420 "Not all Moors are Black. Berbers are Moors."
WRONG again!!! Modern berbers have nothing to do with the ancient berbers!! Most of the modern berbers you see today are helplessly mixed with ROMANS, GREEKS, MAMELUKS, CENTRAL ASIAN TURKS.
You cannot compare the modern population of Northern Africa to Ancient North Africa ... Are you serious!!
A little genetic research would reveal that the P2 gene pretty much clusters all AFRICANS on the continent together.
dogons2k12 5 months ago
@dogons2k12 Do you desire an admission from me that you know more about the Moors than I? Alright, granted.
That being said though I must ask. Were the Dutch in Africa Justified in settling Africa as the Moors were justified in settling south Continental Europe? OR were they both wrong?
Or perhaps it's not an issue of Morality at all.Perhaps more advanced peoples will always occupy ,esser advanced peoples.
WhiteWeasel420 5 months ago
@WhiteWeasel420 Of course it's an issue which most people will not dictate one answer.
guiltytangent 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WhiteWeasel420 IAGO "Even now, now, very now, an old black ram Is tupping your white ewe. Arise, arise; Awake the snorting citizens with the bell, Or else the devil will make a grand sire of you." Arise I say! (1.1.9)
DAMN DUDE!!! Even Shakespeare, author of OTHELLO THE MOOR OF VENICE knew his history and wasn't ashamed of it.
Show me a painting where OTHELLO is portrayed as WHITE or Middle Eastern?!?
-
THAT's right if there is then it might be a painted by the NAZI KKK
LMAOF
dogons2k12 5 months ago
@WhiteWeasel420 "Japan stole a lot of Americas plans for Robotics and we still know how to manufacture Robotics" HAHAHA...
That's the problem with white people today!!! YOU RELY TOO MUCH ON FOX NEWS, HISTORY CHANNEL and other euroCENTRIC garbage. Pick up a REAL HISTORICAL BOOK and READ!!!!!
Don't you know that the ASIANS had one of the advanced navies and ancient artillery weapons in the world!!! DON't you KNOW THAT the CHINESE (1421 AD) & MALIANS (1311 AD) discovered AMERICA b4 COLUMBUS?!?
dogons2k12 5 months ago
@dogons2k12 LOL You probably think that Fox, MSNBC and CNN aren't all the same crock of lies. No sir, I rely on International News sources. Asia Times is a favorite source. And you? You rely on WHOM for YOUR news?
Don't talk down to me kid, you will never hear me downplay the accomplishments of Asians. However, the Japanese DID get many of their Robotics from men like Nikola Tesla with the Radio controlled torpedo, or thecreation of Televox by Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
WhiteWeasel420 5 months ago
@WhiteWeasel420 I refer on international, AFRICAN & AFRICAN DIASPORA sources when it comes to AFRICAN HISTORY!!!!! AMERICAN HISTORY books is based on LIES upon LIES!!!!
Here is a source for you!!
-
"Morocco in the 17th century had a black king."
Ancient civilizations of Africa/ UNESCO International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General History of Africa; editor, G. Mokhtar (London; Heinemann Educational Books; Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981), 406
dogons2k12 5 months ago
@dogons2k12 That being said however Japan is leading the way in Robotics today, despite WHERE they got the idea from or who did what first.
As a White Nationalist I hate nothing more then you sneaky little cowards trying to twist my statents to seem like I'm talking down to or insulting someone non-White....It shows you will stoop to any underhanded means to discredit me. It's extremely disgusting in my opinion.
WhiteWeasel420 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WhiteWeasel420
The words MOOR, MAURETANIA, & MOROCCO comes from the Greek "MAUROS" which means BLACK.
Don't you know that Ethiopia is a STONE throw away from YEMEN where the moors came from?!?
"Many of the earliest Muslim converts were Africans, and a number of the Muslim faithful sought refuge in Ethiopia because of Arabian hostility to Muhammad's teachings"
Ivan Van Sertima - Golden Age of the Moor page 70.
dogons2k12 5 months ago
@dogons2k12 Dude, dogons, you're a fucking retard. Now get off our computer:)
WhatsReallyGoingOn84 5 months ago
@WhatsReallyGoingOn84
Google: PHILIPPE EMEAGWALI - a Nigerian (Father of the internet) received in1989 Gordon Bell Prize.
Google: Mark Dean. He led the team that developed the ISA bus, and he led the design team responsible for creating the first one-gigahertz computer processor chip.[1] He holds three of IBM's original nine PC patents.
Now explain yourself when you say get of our computer .... Did you invent anything related to computers?!?!
EXACTLY!!! I DIDN'T THINK SO!!!
-
LMAOF
dogons2k12 5 months ago
@dogons2k12 The history of the Internet starts in the 1950s and 1960s. Mr. Emeagwali was born in 1954. He likely helped out a tad and had awards heaped on him for PC reasons. A valiant effort, but, I'm sure we could have done it without him. Again, with Mr. Dean, computer technology was already in motion in the 1950s. We Euros could have easily progressed on the same course without him, although, I do value his contributions.
WhatsReallyGoingOn84 5 months ago
Comment removed
WhatsReallyGoingOn84 5 months ago
@dogons2k12 So, this would be like if I made a ProTools rip-off, then edited some hip-hop songs, then called myself the Father of Hip-Hop. Jumping to PC conclusions. So Mr. Dean created the first one-giga chip. It's not like we wouldn't have done it anyway; he was just placed at the head of the team that was working with pre-existing technology (made by Whites). Peace:)
WhatsReallyGoingOn84 5 months ago
@WhatsReallyGoingOn84
Dude Technology goes back to ancient times ... If we start asking who started what then nobody in modern times will ever get any credit.
Remember BLACK MUSLIMS invaded Europe in 711 AD and ruled Europe for 700 years. They brought the GREEKS knowledge who in turn got it from KMT.
So where exactly do you start?! Everybody has contributed to our modern civilization:)
watch?v=iA5Foy0uLAU
watch?v=_R-0MyTsmiU
watch?v=l1LhCzQDoXA
watch?v=j8BrfmGrkzo&feature=related
dogons2k12 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He was Polynesian/Ainu and DNA proved it. Not European so you guys are all euro-centric racist idiots.. The guy that assumed this made a comment that it had Caucasian features than it blew way out of proportion and went viral nation wide. Then they did a DNA test and found out he was genetically related to Polynesian/Ainu people. Quit living a fantasy and live by the truth.
mongolANDtamerlane 5 months ago
Since young, without knowing anything about antropology, I always thought these pictures of indian chiefs showed aquiline noses and that its a tipical whites characteristic.
MsArgentana 5 months ago
Hog wash
southernmostcali 5 months ago
In south America,modern day Peru they found the ancient Cloud people civilisation,they had white skin and were wiped out.
JohnPurchaseArt 6 months ago
where was the Kenniwik man found? and if he is the oldest human specimen ever found it would be impossible to compare his facial features to that of other specimens because human physical features have changed quite a bit over thousands of years
mendozazer 6 months ago
@mendozazer "where was the Kenniwik man found?" Seriously? Is that a real question? Kennewick man was found in Kennewick, WA. If you would have actually listened to the narrator you would know that 2 men were taking a walk along the Columbia river in Kennewick, WA and "stumbled" across something up they thought was rock, which turned out to be a skull. If you can't even listen to the narrator then why should anyone count anything you question or say as credible?
NuthinButIvory 6 months ago
HAHA that picture of the kennewick man remade face is OBVIOUSLY of siberian native american decent. the high cheeck nones and broad nose.. give me a break!
catoplayboy 6 months ago
@catoplayboy Stanford made a reconstruction that looks 100% white...
KnoxSUX 6 months ago
@KnoxSUX LMFAO. I'm suuure it does bro.. ever thought facial features can't always be traced.. either way, DNA proves all this crap wrong. SUCK IT.
catoplayboy 6 months ago
@catoplayboy How does DNA prove it wrong? The US government is covering up this whole thing because the "Indians" are scared of a little truth. Get over it, the "Indians" weren't the first people in America. The Incan mummies have RED hair. We were worshipped as gods.
KnoxSUX 5 months ago
@KnoxSUX Most South American tribes have stories of the white skinned gods with hair of gold. They always bring them sacred knowledge and mate with their women.
WhiteWeasel420 5 months ago
@WhiteWeasel420 There is no genetic evidence for that, kennewick man is related to ainu and jomon. These so called white skinned gods and golden hair are ALBINO'S go take a look at the albino south american indians.
mongolANDtamerlane 5 months ago
@mongolANDtamerlane Go take a look at Albino South American Indians? LOLOL okay but what does that prove? Society's tend to look down on Albino's as different not "Special"
The skull sir :p The skull of Kennewick man is a Caucasian skull.
WhiteWeasel420 5 months ago
@WhiteWeasel420 Why do people keep thinking that caucasian skull = White
Genetically kennewick man is related to ainu, not caucasians.
Indians have caucasian skull
Pakistani have caucasian skull
Arabs have caucasian skull
Persians have caucasian skull
Heck even north africans have caucasian skull
mongolANDtamerlane 5 months ago
@mongolANDtamerlane Why do you people seem to think white's aren't cauvasians? :o
Either way, even If Kennewick man didn't use German technology...have a british accent...enjoy Italian food LOLOL He was STILL a Caucasian.
and the Bottom line STILL is that the Native Americans were not the first people and probably had something to do with Kennewick mans dissapearance..if ya get my drift LOL.
Persians ARE white. Anyone with white skin, blonde hair and blue eyes is white in my book.
WhiteWeasel420 5 months ago
@mongolANDtamerlane And even alot of the Ainu people strike me as White looking....Hell Japanese People in general, many look more "white" than Mongoloid to me.
WhiteWeasel420 5 months ago
@WhiteWeasel420 Accept ainu are white looking australoid who have NO genetic relation with europeans like the black australoids of black africans. Only 0000.1% japanese look white but hell many slanty eye white people strike me as asian looking. Hell even persian,indian,pakistani,arabs,north-africans look white with genetic mutation like albinism.We should include indian,pakistani, iraqi,osama binladin as white since the south asians and middle easterners are the ancestors of white race.
mongolANDtamerlane 5 months ago