Guys the WTC collapse on its own because of the plane crash u are gonna be sayin thats not good detail well.... Look in here and look at the fire area on the WTC now u have to look closly at the collapse area before it tumbles down u will see that the buildin is getting weakined now if u guys say we know that already this was just a comment for the dummies who really dont know wat happened i hope all those peopl who died on 9/11 are in heaven havin peace with jesus;( rip
@crystaluchia101 i agree, the steel was cut during clean up, i only titled this video what i did cuz i knew it would attract truthers looking for any way to prove conspiracy, look at the view count, it is much higher than any other of my videos, it shows that truthers are desperate to find proof cuz they don't have any.
2 of my videos explain how it was the planes that destroyed the towers and the towers collapses destroyed wtc 7.
What is disinformation for imbeciles? I would suppose his next video he tells us what a great president George Bush is! Explosives were not used. This is obvious looking at the giant holes where the WTC's once stood. This building was designed to collapse by launching support beams up to 500 feet away as the floors pulverize themselves to dust. This is the result of what happens when cartoon planes are allowed to escape. Top secret documents reveal Bin Laden's long history as a cartoonist.
@PlanetMadness in this video i claim that the steel was cut during clean up here is a different video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
my video "how the towers fell" explains how the planes destroyed the towers and that explosives were not possible it can not be proven wrong and is made so that a 7 yr old child will understand it so if you disagree to it comment on it and prove it wrong then ask a child to explain why you are wrong
@rantingrich All anyone has to do to KNOW you're an imbicile is read your comment. I would hardly call the collapse of a building that had been pelted by 120 stories of concrete and steel and then left to burn for hours "magical" But you're obviously not to bright.
@Redrover8431 anyone who does not understand that a plane could destroy a building does not have all the clues, anyone who still does not admit the towers were destroyed by the planes after watching my video "how the towers fell" proves they want it to have been a conspiracy, and also proves they don't want the truth.
here is a video explaining WTC 7 which can't be disputed by anyone unless they are in denial.
@Redrover8431 anyone who does not understand that a plane could destroy a building does not have all the clues, anyone who still does not admit the towers were destroyed by the planes after watching my video "how the towers fell" proves they want it to have been a conspiracy, and also proves they don't want the truth.
here is a video explaining WTC 7 which can't be disputed by anyone unless they are in denial.
@Redrover8431 anyone who does not understand that a plane could destroy a building does not have all the clues, anyone who still does not admit the towers were destroyed by the planes after watching my video "how the towers fell" proves they want it to have been a conspiracy, and also proves they don't want the truth.
here is a video explaining WTC 7 which can't be disputed by anyone unless they are in denial.
@onceevinicinitemizle so you think by me saying the steel was cut during clean up i am getting paid to bullshit? here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up. /watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
none of my videos are bullshitting, that is your lame attempt of trying to make it look like i am lying, you can't prove any of my videos wrong, not even this one.
i am exposing the lie movement, they are the ones getting paid for bullshiting.
@TheCatcher70 i can say the planes destroyed ("i guestimate") 40% of the steel in the impact zones and the fact that the top of the so. tower leaned to the side it was hit just before collapse when the steel was weakened by the 2000 deg fires is proof that the steel was destroyed by the planes, they can claim the planes only destroyed 5% which would be their guestimate, and who would be able to prove their guestimate based on the evidence?
All anyone has to do to KNOW 911 was an inside job is watch WTC#7 Fall magically down! I know I know DON'T TRUST your lying eyes. Listen to the Government propaganda! After all using your own mind and common sense is way to hard! Trust your government and the mass media! After all they have never lied to you! By the way Loose Change exposed get a damn microphone that didn't come with your 9 year old daughters Hanna Montanta Sing along kit!
@rantingrich i trust what the clues and evidence show, i made 2 videos explaining the towers and wtc 7 collapses.
1) how the towers fell.
2) WTC 7 the hidden truth
you will realize i am right about both of them when you can't figure out how to prove them wrong, or you will realize you want it to be a government conspiracy when you don't agree with them (they are childhood logic) or don't want to face the truth by not even watching them.
@fukademous the reason is at first i did let all comments go thru but noticed that truthers post things like "we all know 9/11 was an inside job" those types of comments are attempts to get people to believe them without proof in other words those are propaganda, i want my comments to be questions and answers from both sides so people who read the comments can decide what the truth is, truthers post those comments to hide the answers.
they also post those comments to hide the ones that have answers, the perfect example of truthers trying to make it look like what they need is in my video "sept 11th the smoking gun" check it out and see if you can explain why jason bermis is not telling all the facts. and leave a comment about it.
@woodstockbc it wasn't only the towers and building 7 that were destroyed, the fall out of the towers was so widespread that 8 buildings were destroyed from the fallout besides the towers, if you google "ground zero then and now" you can click on each building and see the before, the after math and the future of each one, here is one of my videos showing footage of how the towers collapses did destroy wtc 7
@774stefan here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up, it is proof that they did cut the steel during clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
where is your proof that it was cut to bring down the towers? not what other people said about it where is the hard core evidence that was left behind?
This is nothing more than your opinion. Nothing scientific. Now if you had a picture of steal being cut that's a different story. You have no date or proof. Silly really. While you at it, let's here your "opinion" on why the steal was removed before it could be forensically tested.
@OG905EsC i sound like i know nothing? i am explaining how the steel that was cut at the WTC was cut during clean up and not to bring down the towers, how do i know? and how can i prove it? well i am glad you asked, here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
that is what you call proof, something the conspiracy theory movement doesn't have, where is the evidence of explosives besides what you heard (hearsay) from other truthers?
typical idiotic american, all the videos, live news reporters showing these attacks, normal been with their cams saw these planes hit, blow up, hit wtc2 and blew up, we all seen them fall but no ,like JFK!! you dicks from america make it a conspiricy., your idiotic videos are bull, there is no proof here you knob head, who cares about steal been cut you dick, it was terrorism and horrible but you dicks always show it worse then it always are. research yourselves and the crap you cunts talk. dick
@joejoe2308 i titled this video the way i did cuz i knew it would have truthers looking to find any evidence they could, in this video i explain how the steel was cut during clean up and not to take down the towers, watch the video this time and see what i talk about then watch this video>> /watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0 to see that it is proof of the steel being cut by workers during clean up.
one question if thermite cant cut through steel why does the army use it for bombs plus thermite can cut through steel and thermite residue was found at the WTC.
@EnviousKryptic thermite is a good incindiary material, it's like gunpowder, once ignited it is hard to stop.
what was found was elements of what makes up thermite, iron and aluminum.
the towers were made of iron and the planes aluminum, the 2 materials were fused togeather in the impacts, fires, and collapses, the planes explosions not setting of thermite and dropping the towers right away is key
check out my video how the towers fell it explains exactly how the towers came down
@EnviousKryptic The Army does not use it for bombs. They have grenades that the drop down the tube of a gun or set on an engine block. You don't even have to go all the way through the metal.
The "thermite residue" that chucklenuts Jones found was paint. Any welder will also tell you that it behaves the way that pint does when you hit it with a torch.
@leftysergeant it's funny how even when truthers make shit up i know how to explain how they are wrong, it's like a game of chess and i am 5 steps ahead of all of them.
lets see the video of the workers cutting the beams like this. there has to be at least one video of it. how bout a still photo of workers torching the steel beems?
@shotgunpsycho here is a video of workers talking about cutting the steel, you can see that the square steel is what made up the exterior and that is the only type of pics of cut steel at the WTC anywhere on the internet.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
here is a video with a still pic of a guy cutting a huge steel I beam, it was I beam construction that made up the cores.
Holy shit, finally someone w LOGIC! Thank you for these kind of videos. I used to be a "truther", but when I did my own research and used logic I seen that none of the theories make ANY sense. You're the only one, besides me, I've heard talk about the plane hitting then setting off the thermite or charges on impact, which would've resulted in an immediate collapse. Also the Loose Change guys made the original LC as a project for bullshit, which resulted in them becoming "famous". Thanks again..
@BlakGlasses always happy to hear from someone who use to believe people like loose change cuz if their friends still believe it they can show them some videos that explain what happened without hiding key information.
i have 3 videos in my uploads that shows exactly what happened to the towers and wtc 7.
"how the towers fell"
"WTC 7 the hidden truth"
and this one expoese jason bermis of loose change for a cover up.
@tony3th 40 story building, 22 floors compromised from the collapse of the towers. Fires on ALL 40 floors. The building had 3 supporting trusses, 1 (maybe 2) of which were destroyed. Collapsed happened. Easy answer buddy, do the research and don't ignore the facts.
Yes I totally agree with this theory! I personally think one of the secretaries on the 80th floor used her scissors to cut the steel away. Don't forget the steel was very hot, which made it softer, so I'm sure she was able to cut it with scissors, or maybe it was a group of secretaries. What a complete dumb ass!
@jasonr71 this is not a theory, the steel was cut during clean up, here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting it.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
that is what you call proof, i made a video about how the steel was cut during clean up then i proved it to you with a video of the guys talking about cutting it.
you can see how it was a conspiracy when you ignore all the evidence. you people have nothing but hopes and wishes, try finding a geanie in a bottle then you can make it true.
@loosechangeexposed 4 huge boeings fly low over crowded cities at rush hour, no one believes it, but im sure theres loads of cctv of this, please forward link of vid that shows JUST ONE AIRLINER WITH ITS TAIL COLOURS, don't innundate us, we're sure theres loads, just send link to one, if you can....should we even expect an answer herre??? stupid COINTELPRO SHILL???
@wellifthemediasaysit flight 93 went down in PA. it did not fly low over any crowded city, flight 77 hit the pentagon it came in from the west and did not fly low untill it dropped out of the sky on final approach, it did not fly low over a major city, flight 11 hit the north tower, there is video of that happening, many people believe it, even you do, flight 175 hit the south tower there are many videos, when you ignore all the evidence you can make it what you want.
@loosechangeexposed 'flight this hit that...etc'...wow, rock solid evidence there shill, no wonder you moderate posts, you are being destroyed left right and centre, not one vid shows an airliner, all you parrot is 'my video (someone elses) pwooves this, pwooves that, sheer desperation eh shill, COINTELPRO only get what they pay for i guess!! 9/11 was still an inside job, i can hit 100 vids, before your shift starts in the morning!!
@wellifthemediasaysit i notice that not one of your comments prove one of my videos wrong, you post propaganda you heard from other people, this video is about how the steel was cut during clean up, and here is 2 workers talking about cutting it.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
i you think i am wrong then prove every one of my videos wrong, the way i broke loose change up into 227 parts and prove every part wrong.
start with my video "how the towers fell" you will learn something.
I don't see how you can be so simple minded but I do have one question for you. Why did building 7 fall? Please answer with as little bullshit as possible. If possible.
@SuperMadmax2000 your comment is just like every other truther comment, it is what you think and not what you prove, just like every claim made by the lie movement.
i started out making a rebutal video to loose change but had way too much against them so i needed to write a book, many of my videos are excerpts from the book, and if you think i am in it for the money (which is why loose change did their video) go to my website and read about the 9/11 victims charity store.
to sum up on the truthers vs shills debate, one side now has 1000s of architects, engineers, actors, sportsmen, politicians, and millions of citizens, as well as the laws of physics, common sense, and what their eyes and ears tell them....the other side is a few abusive people who exist only on the internet, with several usernames, whose only answers to normal questions about 9/11 are filled with 'twooftard, asstard, lol, lmfao, twoofie' etc, i wonder which side is most believable?
in over 10 years 9/11 has not been proven to have been a conspiracy, if it was there would be at least 1 person in prison for it, the entire movement is based on hearsay, rumors, speculations, and opinions, not evidence or proof. the following video is evidence of a cover up by a 9/11 truther, twisting what he needs to make it look like he is right, but the video tells what he does not, all the facts. /watch?v=E1FTx-PhW_s
@WheresMyUSA this is a country by the people for the people of the people, the polititions and government work for the people, if enough people sign petitions they have to listen, you believe truthers that say there will never be a new investigation who use that excuse to say the govt is hiding the truth, they don't want a new investigation cuz if there was evidence out there they themselves would have found it. my video "sept 11th the smoking gun" proves they are the real cover up.
well yea thats the thing. wheres the petitions at. ill sign em all but its not very common to find any information at all in comments here at least about that
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?
If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?
How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?
@ctcole77 1.Top-down controlled demolition.The 90 undamaged floors below the impact zone "failed" too i.e.exploded into dust in midair.2.The planes were remote controlled,they knew where they would impact.Thermitic reactions were video recorded in the impact zone of the South Tower.Explosives that can't be detonated by fire,like C-4,could have also been used.3.AlJazeera is British Intelligence.KSM "confessed" in 2007 after 6 months of torture and the threat of his kids being tortured.
@fakeyf9 when the top of the so. tower fell over to the side it was hit just before collapse it is proof that the steel on that side was destroyed by the impact (the no. tower suffered the same type of damage) the fires weakened the undestroyed steel to the point it could no longer support the weight of the structure above each impact zone, this is why the so. tower fell 1st (more weight to support) my video "how the towers fell" goes into all the details.
there was about half the weight above the impact zone in the no. tower so it took about twice as long to weaken the undestroyed steel in that tower.
the planes created static electricity from the friction and also severed the buildings electrical wiring which made contact with the core steel, that would have set off any devices that would have needed to be attached directly to the steel in order to destroy it.
the thermatic reaction you talk about was not steel because if any steel was melted by thermite the entire floor truthers claim was set up with thermite would have needed to be tied into a sequence, thermite is activated by fire and the planes explosions would have set it off and started the collapses upon impact and even you know that didn't happen.
the thermatic reaction you talk about was the aluminum from the plane, it has a lower melting point than steel, the fires burned at about 2000 deg, not hot enough to melt steel (and the fires would have set off any thermite seeing how it is activated by fire and other thermite it is connected to) but it was hot enough to weaken the undestroyed steel, and was hot enough to melt the aluminum plane.
if the planes were remote controlled where are the ones they say crashed that day? and where are all the people? they identified all the passengers at the pentagon. if they were the planes and they were also remote controlled why do we have all this evidence of terrorists going to our flight schools, the video of them boarding the planes, my video "how the towers fell" explains the collapses and can't be proven wrong. give it a try.
@BloodyDragonStudios oh, so you didn't find any proof that the steel was cut by workers so you conclude that the steel wasn't cut by anyone? what about this video that has 2 workers talking about cutting the steel?>> /watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
Typical government defender, your video is a joke. You are not an expert and obviously have no real facts. I could disprove every single thing you say with actual facts. Also did you forget the bulding was designed to withstand MULTIPLE airliner strikes at the same time.
@StickHits is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up real facts? /watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0 or do you only take the word of witnesses who don't know what they heard and make that look like explosives? parts of the building falling apart sounded like explosions. yes the towers did withstand the plane impacts, it was the fires weakening the undestroyed steel and the weight above each impact zone that caused the collapses, why do you think the so. tower fell 1st?
@januseski if i was a moron then why can't you prove every one of my videos wrong? you didn't even prove this one wrong, here is where i got my information that shows the steel was cut during clean up which also shows that i have more evidence that the steel was cut during clean up than you have of a controlled demolition.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
that video is evidence that my comment just proved that your comment is propaganda.
The towers fell at the speed of fucking GRAVITY!! Stop investigating the aftermath and research what really matters. Logically those towers would have fallen floor by floor with each floor slowing down the collapse, which is not the case here. Watch the videos in real time and you'll see that the towers were in a freefall. Simple as that.... Boom Bitch!
@BigRuben205 what caused the collapses of the towers was not the steel snapping but the nuts, bolts, and rivetts that held the steel togeather, what started the collapses was the fires weakening the steel that was not destroyed by the plane and the weight above each impact zone, that is why the so. tower fell 1st (more weight) my video "how the towers fell" explains all the details.
your comment has been documented, it is a violation of the user agreement to call someone a bitch.
I'm sorry I just have a hard time buying that fire alone makes these structures weaken and fail. Especially building 7. I'm not a conspiracy wacko but it seems strange
@thunderbirdlver my video "how the towers fell" explains the details of how it was the initial damage to the cores, the fires WEAKENING not MELTING the undestroyed steel to the point it could no longer support the weight above each impact point, which is why the so. tower fell 1st, more weight to support.
there was about twice as much weight above the impact zone of the so. tower and it fell about twice as soon as the north tower did.
They fell at free-fall speed. You can see blasting charges going down as the towers collapsed. Whatever you think happened, these were the first steel and concrete buildings to fall from fire, ever. Even with some upper floors weakened, the towers fell in a manner like it they were professionally demolished. The South Tower was especially odd, because the plane didn't even hit in the middle, and a lot lower. The top should have just fell over.
@timramich truthers tell you that the fires could not have taken down the towers but they are not telling all the facts, NO the fires did NOT get hot enough to MELT the steel, what they don't tell you is they DID get hot enough to WEAKEN the steel that was undestroyed by the planes impacts, the weight above each impact zone dictated when the steel would be weak enough to fail, that is why the so. tower fell 1st. my video "how the towers fell" explains all the details. leave a comment.
@Holymakinaw my video "how the towers fell" explains the details of how it was the initial damage to the cores, the fires WEAKENING not MELTING the undestroyed steel to the point it could no longer support the weight above each impact point, which is why the so. tower fell 1st, more weight to support.
there was about twice as much weight above the impact zone of the so. tower and it fell about twice as soon as the north tower did.
You are an idiot. You have a "theory" and have not proved anything. Why dont you call the DOD and ask for the 100 tons of rubble they shipped to China and had melted down. Why cant we see if that steel REALLY melted as a result of jet fuel. After all if the 9/11 Commissino Report is true and you say no conspiracy occured then where is the transparency by the government. Why dont you look up Susan Lindauer and tell her she is a fraud? Do you know her story and what she knew prior to Sept 11?
@NorthSider244 truthers tell you the fires could not have destroyed the towers but they are not telling all the facts, NO the fires did NOT get hot enough to MELT the steel, what they don't tell you is they DID get hot enough to WEAKEN the steel that was undestroyed by the impacts, the weight above each impact zone dictated when the steel would be weak enough to fail, that is why the so. tower fell 1st. my video "how the towers fell" explains all the details. leave a comment.
@blueeyedguy86 my video "how the towers fell" explains how it was the fires weakening the steel that was undestroyed by the planes along with the weight above each impact zone which caused the collapses.
this video explains wtc7>> /watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
after hours of fires in wtc 7 the structure could no longer support the weight of 47 storys and failed, the reason those other buildings didn't fall is there was no weight left.
it wasn't just fire, there was more to it than that.
conspiracy theorists, learn a trade. this steel was clearly cut by an Oxygene-Acetylene torch.
logic dictates (if youve ever been inside a building) that its kind of hard to access the structural steel components of a building without removing the interior of it, ie: the walls. and if you did this to a beam it would collapse right away, not wait until the exact right moment. fucking idiots, now i have to close youtube. thanks to you morons, im pissed off.
@isSHEEPMANimmortal i titled the video what i did to lure truthers in and it worked, look at the view count, way more views than any other video i have. it proves they are desperate to find anything. i know the steel was cut during clean up here is a video of where i got that info.
@loosechangeexposed because in a gravity driven collapse the speed would have decreased not increased. The collapse increased and maintained speed, if it was going through the greatest path of resistance it was have deaccelerated.
You are too obseesed with exposing Loose Change and are confusing this with your stated goal of disproving a conspiracy...it is nobody's job to disprove your conjecture - it is everybody's job to simply seek the truth.
@JusticeSpringChicken i transcribed every word in the video loose change into 227 parts and answered each part, that is the content of my book, i then took parts and turned them into these videos, if you think i am too obsessed with loose change it's only because i have so many videos where i prove them wrong, i prove them wrong 100% of their video, i have other videos too like proving wrong alex jones, jesse ventura, richard gage. see how many you agree with.
The steel in that picture is cut on a perfect 45 degree angle. the video of the 2 men talking about cutting the beams then shows an image of ruff cut steel with what looks like a 15 degree angle. u don’t cut vertical beams at 45 degree because it wont fall like a tree like you claim it will slide too close to the person cutting. but the main reason you don’t cut at 45 degree is because the cut is too long too time consuming too expensive. am not saying 911 was an inside job but it stinks!
@dagaffaman here is the video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
notice that the steel is square? it made up the exterior, so where are all the pictures of I beams that were in the cores? and you just put it into perspective for everyone, you said "time consuming too expensive" how long would it take to cut the steel in 267 floors of wtc 1, 2, and 7? and how would the steel on the 1st 10 floors support the weight of over 100 floors?
all demolition teams cut steel this way,larry silverstein had it demolished to make money on his insurance scheme on the towers,mossad was involved too,typical jews controlling america via media and finances
@Cyrax181 here is a video of wtc 7, notice that the firefighters say they knew the building would collapse due to the damage suffered by the collapsing towers and the raging fires inside, it was the firefighters assesment of that building that showed it would fall long before it did, if it was a planned demolition they would have said they didn't expect it to fall, or do you think the fdny were also part of the scheme?
@loosechangeexposed I believe all 3 buildings were rigged with explosives,Israels mossad and larry silverstein were behind the attacks,they have managed to manipulate the American government and people into thinking it was the work of Osama by using the jewish owned media in America, Bush knew the attacks would happen too but it gives him the thumbs up to go and get the oil . Israel wants America and her allies to fight Muslim countries in the middle east that hate Israel , cool vid too :)
@Cyrax181 your entire comment is based on the propaganda spread by the truthers who made videos, wrote books, and speak in public. they keep the lies going for the money. i have many videos that expose the lie movement and prove that explosives were not possible, if you know the truth then it should be easy for you to prove every one of my videos wrong. try these
sept 11th the smoking gun
how the towers fell
wtc 7 the hidden truth
also answer the question on the top of my channel page.
What was those unknown workers doing on that level all day before the attack? No one in WT knew the details what they were doing or where allowed to see!
@CliveGains80s do you think they cut that steel the same day? no, the rescue efforts went on for days before they could start the clean up, here is a 2 minute video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
notice the cranes and equipment in the background? how long did it take to set it up? and if the steel was cut to collapse the towers, why would they need to cut it? wouldn't they have just put it on trucks and hauled it away?
You can cut 90% of the steel the building well still stand. But that last 10 % make it easy take out after that. How do you that take building down on demo. First pre cut the steel. And jet fuel fire is not hot enought to burn steel. The older steel works are better than todays steel build buildings.
@cadman311 if the steel was cut and explosives were used why was the fallout of the towers so wide spread? wouldn't all the momentum have been taken away? wouldn't there have been a lot more steel that was cut at the scene? here is a video showing 2 guys talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
how long would it take to cut all the steel and set up for explosives? why didn't the planes impacts set off the explosives?
I guess all the architects for truth,engineers for truth, fireman for truth, pilots for truth, even the 9 of ten NIST guys that claim the investigation was hindered and controlled. after all, building 7 isnt even in the report. also, NO skyscrapers EVER fell do to fire, in HISTORY, before this. Until you can argue with those professionals, & experts that say you're an idiot, you will remain an idiot. conspiracy theories are how crimes are solved, it doesnt make the theorist crazy or not valid.
@2skullscrushing my video "how the towers fell" proves that even a 3rd grader can explain how the 9/11 conspiracy theory movement can't prove that the planes didn't take down the towers.
if you believe the conspiracy theory movement is right then you should be able to explain how each and every one of my videos are wrong, start with this one, explain where the proof is that the steel was cut to bring down the towers, here is a video of the clean up.
Just looked at the video that you suggested, the cut angle is a lot different, the video that you pointed too is a very shallow angle, the steel is not just allowed to fall, the shallow angle is safe for this. The angle of the cut steel 45deg on this video, the same angle used in controlled demolition so it slides smoothly, no one with a cutting torch is going to cut a 45deg angle into a free standing piece of steel, they aren't that stupid. Open your eyes and wake up my friend....
@EvRevDesigns i present proof that the steel was cut during clean up, here is the video to make sure you got the right one.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
so you ignore video evidence? where is the evidence of explosives? i have a question. how did they plant explosives in the towers so that the planes impacts wouldn't set them off, remember there were fireballs, static electricity and the towers severed electrical wiring which one of would have set them off but didn't you even know that.
@loosechangeexposed Look we can go round and round with these augments.... I generally don't argue with people anymore because it goes no where. What I say to people is watch the 3 buildings collapse, clear your mind of the emotion and let your eyes tell you what the truth is and after that make your own mind up....
@EvRevDesigns this video explains how the steel was cut during clean up, i also posted a link to the video where is got that info from, it is the video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up. can you at least admit that some of the steel was cut during clean up based on the evidence i presented to you?
@Cyrax181 that is a site of a conspiracy theorist, all sites like that are based on propaganda, no real proof or evidence, if it was creditable there would be people in jail. truthers have calims that the gov't is covering up, but never produce any real proof.
i claim that truthers are the ones who are lying, hiding evidence and twist what they tell you into what they need to believe, here is my video proving that 1 truther is involved in a cover up and i have more
Conspiracy theorists tell you what you want to hear? So basically exacly the same as your doing, telling the conspiracy denialists what they want to hear.
Get over yourself dude, more people in the world believe it was inside jobrather than a terrorist attack.
@gunmanscotland conspiracy theorists tell you what to believe based on what they heard from other people, none of them provide real evidence, this video explains how the steel was cut during clean up, and here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
evidence that the steel was cut during clean up>>> /watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
evidence that the steel was cut to bring down the towers>>> ???
@EvRevDesigns the steel was cut at an angle so it would fall in a certain direction so it wouldn't hit or hurt anyone, you can try and make me look as dumb as you want to try to discredit me but i am on to every trick truthers attempt and none of you are as smart as me, i notice that you failed to prove this video wrong, before you try again look at the video of the 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
This coment is to prove you talk out your ass. Try watching some controlled demolitions being prepared. Then you will see all this "Sliced Steel" talk, is you trying to sound intellegent. You prove nothing here what so ever except that a photograph was taken of a steel cut bar. Can you prove this picture came from the 9/11 wreckage? I think not.
@ReganVisitation you may be misunderstanding this video, i titled it to see if it would get truthers to prove they are desperate to find evidence of controlled demo and it worked, look at the view count, way more than any other video i have, i say in the video that the steel was cut during clean up, here is a video of 2 workers talking about it.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
and yes you can see that the steel in this video is in the footage.
First off, YOU IGNORAMUS! Unless you're the steel worker that cut it, or happened to be standing there watching who did, per explanation. Its impossible to say with absolute 100% certainty when, why, how, or whom cut or didnt cut the steel pictured. ERGO... Most arguments are based not on hard evidence from FIRST hand Knowledge. Without eyeball proof, Its 1prt speculative, 1prt editorializing [opinion], with a cover-up topping, & bit of conspiracy theory thrown in for good measure. Nothing more!
So jetfuel weakened the steel on the 70th floor, but also weakened all the steel equally throughout the building so it fell perfectly, and on both buildings, what about wtc7?
@shorfilmman here is a video i made explaining how the towers were brought down by the planes.
/watch?v=ywHW5UewN8A
the fires weakened the undestroyed steel at the impact zones, to the point it could no longer support the above weight, it was the weight that hit the floor below and snapped bolts and rivetts that held the steel togeather, floor after floor as more weight was added.
here is a video explaining the hidden truth about wtc 7.
@loosechangeexposed EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS NO VIDEO OF THE PLANES TAKING OFF FROM THEIR ORIGINAL AIRPORTS... EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS NO PICTURES OF THE ACTUAL PLANES TO COMPARE TO THE VIDEOS OF THEM HITTING... EXPLAIN WHY THE GOVERNMENT SPENT MORE MONEY TO INVESTIGATE CLINTON GETTING HIS DICK SUCKED COMPARED TO WHAT THEY SPENT ON INVESTIGATING OVER 3000 PEOPLE DYING... EXPLAIN?
@MrRaptur3 do you think they video record and document every plane that takes off? do you know that would be impossible and very costly? there is footage of the terrorists boarding the planes. the gov't spent more money on the clinton investigation cuz they were lied to by him and didn't know who to believe, they didn't waste a lot of money on investigating the attacks because the evidence shows that it happened the way we all saw it.
so much for being able to cover up the attacks when they couldn't even cover up the clinton scandel if you notice the mainstream media makes Obama (democrat) look good while trying to discredit the GOP (republicans) why couldn't the media expose Bush (republican)
why doesn't the truth movement pay for a new investigation with the money they made from their books and videos? cuz they know that they didn't find any evidence
the lie movement will not pay for a new investigation cuz they know the people they hire will not find anything new cuz they themselves would have found it by now, that and it is their money they made from the bogus claims in the books and videos they wrote, but if the govt pays for a new investigation and when they don't find any new evidence that shows conspiracy, truthers will say the investigators were paid off.
quenced and their purpose is to control the oute@loosechangeexposed I would love to hear your explanation about the numerous squibs evidenced in every video of the collapse of towers 1, 2 and 7. Squibs are sequenced to control the outer part of the building during the fall. essentially they negate side slip, an inevitable consequence of a pancake collapse. No credible demolition expert would testify under oath that building 1, 2 or 7 were pancake collapses.
@andrew75056 i sometimes refer people to videos that explain better and in less space than a text post what they ask about, i did make a video, you can find it in my uploads, titled "loose change answer number 138" it explains the squibs.
the video (not mine) "miracle in stairwell B" where 14 people survived inside the no. tower, 13 of who were firemen, a few say you could hear the floors hitting 1 on top of the other, one even says the term "PANCAKE EFFECT"
there was about twice as much weight above the impact zone in the so. tower than there was above the impact zone in the no. tower. and the no. tower took about twice as long for the steel to weaken to the point of collapse.
it wasn't so much the steel failing, it was more like the bolts and rivets that held the steel togeather that failed.
that video shows that the fdny knew wtc 7 would collapse, the only way they would know it would and also be from explosives is to have been told it was rigged to collapse, wouldn't the fdny and media blow the whistle or risk being part of mass murder? the mass murder which included 343 of the fdny.
the entire 9/11 conspiracy theory movement is based on hearsay, rumors, speculations, and opinions. just like your comment.
here is a video exposing part of the truth movement in a lie.
/watch?v=w-XD7P7m0Ug&feature=related
here is a video exposing a truther in a cover up.
/watch?v=E1FTx-PhW_s
look thru my videos you will notice that you will only have questions that show you are in denial, you will never be able to prove me wrong cuz you believe liars and scumbags.
what about the architechts and physicists who say it is impossible for the building to fall at freefall speed? Yes, alot of falling weight above where the planes hit, but over 80 floors of good steel beneath to slow it down too? That alone kills the "pancake" theory, it would have lost speed and monentum, not gained it. WTC 7,? steel framed buildings dont fall from fire, never once in history, until 9/11 when 3 of them fell. And what about the smaller ones right next to 1&2? those didnt collapse
@MrDANNYUNDERWOODky here is why they are lying, books, videos, and speaches about conspiracy make more money than the truth, they are lying to make money, here is how i can explain they are lying, nobody but truthers say the buildings fell due to fire, it was the initial damage the fires weakening the undestroyed steel and the weight above each impact zone that caused the collapses of the towers, here is a video explaining it.
Ok...makes sense...so your saying that the showers of molten steel seen on some videos and the rivers of molten steel reported by some Firefighters was caused by the plane fuel?...or...???
@lusthawk1 the molten metal in the upper floors was molten aluminum from the planes, it has a lower melting point than steel does, if it was steel at that height the rest of the steel would have been so weak at that point that the building would have been collapsing, the jet fuel burned at 2000 deg not hot enough to melt the steel but was hot enough to weaken the steel to the pointn of structural failure
@lusthawk1 no they are not lying about finding something they found elements of thermite which is iron and aluminum, there was iron in the towers and the planes made of aluminum, the 2 materials fused togeather in the impacts, fires and collapses.
thermite is activated by fire and the planes explosions didn't set it off and drop the towers right away? they are saying it was thermite cuz those stories pay more money that the facts do here is what they wont tell you
Also, the cuts look jagged, which wouldn't be so if some type of cutting device, or charge was used. The characteristics of the cuts point to a person cutting them, which would be impossible to achieve pre-collapse.
One point I would like to make here, is that if these pictures of the angle-cut steel was really evidence that they cut the steel and caused the collapses of the buildings, wouldn't some of the slag be scraped off the cut surface as the building collapses? In other words: wouldn't the movement of the column segment above the cut act like a spatula and scrape the slag off?
@armyhobo12 so what about the video of the 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up? they show footage of what they cut in the video.
We work on demo building we would pre cut parts the steel first. They would look the same way before they would blow the smaller part of steel to do the job. To me that looks like torched steel.
@cadman311 are you saying that all the steel was cut some way thru before the collapses? wouldn't the weight of 100 floors cause it to fail if part of the steel was cut on the 10 lower floors? where is your proof of the steel being cut before the collapses? here is my proof that it was cut during the clean up.
It was those planes dude....get over it. Metal bends too... especially when it's very hot. The only ones responsible for this was those terrorist. You sound like an anarchist who loves to blame America.
@suckonthisyo your comment suggests that you didn't watch the video, i explain in the video that i have proof that the steel was cut during clean up, here is a video of 2 workers talking about it.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
i named the video what i did cuz i knew that truthers would be drawn to it looking for evidence (which they don't have and are desperate to find) i was right just look at the view count compared to every other video i have.
@cablemanization workers were let in to do clean up, if it was a cover up no one would have been allowed in with a camera, and if you think this pic was taken by someone who was in on it why would they release it?
here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
The beams in the video are cut during cleanup work. There are more photo's from the series this photographer made. If you see them all, you understand it's cleanup work. There are also video's of worker burning through the steel, all during cleanup.
Guys the WTC collapse on its own because of the plane crash u are gonna be sayin thats not good detail well.... Look in here and look at the fire area on the WTC now u have to look closly at the collapse area before it tumbles down u will see that the buildin is getting weakined now if u guys say we know that already this was just a comment for the dummies who really dont know wat happened i hope all those peopl who died on 9/11 are in heaven havin peace with jesus;( rip
crystaluchia101 10 hours ago
@crystaluchia101 i agree, the steel was cut during clean up, i only titled this video what i did cuz i knew it would attract truthers looking for any way to prove conspiracy, look at the view count, it is much higher than any other of my videos, it shows that truthers are desperate to find proof cuz they don't have any.
2 of my videos explain how it was the planes that destroyed the towers and the towers collapses destroyed wtc 7.
"how the towers fell"
"WTC 7 the hidden truth"
loosechangeexposed 9 hours ago
What is disinformation for imbeciles? I would suppose his next video he tells us what a great president George Bush is! Explosives were not used. This is obvious looking at the giant holes where the WTC's once stood. This building was designed to collapse by launching support beams up to 500 feet away as the floors pulverize themselves to dust. This is the result of what happens when cartoon planes are allowed to escape. Top secret documents reveal Bin Laden's long history as a cartoonist.
PlanetMadness 1 day ago
@PlanetMadness in this video i claim that the steel was cut during clean up here is a different video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
my video "how the towers fell" explains how the planes destroyed the towers and that explosives were not possible it can not be proven wrong and is made so that a 7 yr old child will understand it so if you disagree to it comment on it and prove it wrong then ask a child to explain why you are wrong
loosechangeexposed 23 hours ago
@rantingrich All anyone has to do to KNOW you're an imbicile is read your comment. I would hardly call the collapse of a building that had been pelted by 120 stories of concrete and steel and then left to burn for hours "magical" But you're obviously not to bright.
Redrover8431 1 day ago
@Redrover8431 anyone who does not understand that a plane could destroy a building does not have all the clues, anyone who still does not admit the towers were destroyed by the planes after watching my video "how the towers fell" proves they want it to have been a conspiracy, and also proves they don't want the truth.
here is a video explaining WTC 7 which can't be disputed by anyone unless they are in denial.
/watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
loosechangeexposed 1 day ago
@Redrover8431 anyone who does not understand that a plane could destroy a building does not have all the clues, anyone who still does not admit the towers were destroyed by the planes after watching my video "how the towers fell" proves they want it to have been a conspiracy, and also proves they don't want the truth.
here is a video explaining WTC 7 which can't be disputed by anyone unless they are in denial.
/watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
loosechangeexposed 1 day ago
@Redrover8431 anyone who does not understand that a plane could destroy a building does not have all the clues, anyone who still does not admit the towers were destroyed by the planes after watching my video "how the towers fell" proves they want it to have been a conspiracy, and also proves they don't want the truth.
here is a video explaining WTC 7 which can't be disputed by anyone unless they are in denial.
/watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
loosechangeexposed 1 day ago
ARE THEY PAYING YOU TO BULLSHIIIT
onceevinicinitemizle 1 day ago
@onceevinicinitemizle so you think by me saying the steel was cut during clean up i am getting paid to bullshit? here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up. /watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
none of my videos are bullshitting, that is your lame attempt of trying to make it look like i am lying, you can't prove any of my videos wrong, not even this one.
i am exposing the lie movement, they are the ones getting paid for bullshiting.
/watch?v=E1FTx-PhW_s
loosechangeexposed 1 day ago
plz dont use the term 'guesstimate' Tell us the facts u no. That way the lunys have no room to move
TheCatcher70 1 day ago
@TheCatcher70 i can say the planes destroyed ("i guestimate") 40% of the steel in the impact zones and the fact that the top of the so. tower leaned to the side it was hit just before collapse when the steel was weakened by the 2000 deg fires is proof that the steel was destroyed by the planes, they can claim the planes only destroyed 5% which would be their guestimate, and who would be able to prove their guestimate based on the evidence?
loosechangeexposed 1 day ago
All anyone has to do to KNOW 911 was an inside job is watch WTC#7 Fall magically down! I know I know DON'T TRUST your lying eyes. Listen to the Government propaganda! After all using your own mind and common sense is way to hard! Trust your government and the mass media! After all they have never lied to you! By the way Loose Change exposed get a damn microphone that didn't come with your 9 year old daughters Hanna Montanta Sing along kit!
rantingrich 3 days ago
@rantingrich i trust what the clues and evidence show, i made 2 videos explaining the towers and wtc 7 collapses.
1) how the towers fell.
2) WTC 7 the hidden truth
you will realize i am right about both of them when you can't figure out how to prove them wrong, or you will realize you want it to be a government conspiracy when you don't agree with them (they are childhood logic) or don't want to face the truth by not even watching them.
loosechangeexposed 3 days ago
Why do you sensor comments? LOL
fukademous 5 days ago
@fukademous the reason is at first i did let all comments go thru but noticed that truthers post things like "we all know 9/11 was an inside job" those types of comments are attempts to get people to believe them without proof in other words those are propaganda, i want my comments to be questions and answers from both sides so people who read the comments can decide what the truth is, truthers post those comments to hide the answers.
cont next post
loosechangeexposed 5 days ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post
they also post those comments to hide the ones that have answers, the perfect example of truthers trying to make it look like what they need is in my video "sept 11th the smoking gun" check it out and see if you can explain why jason bermis is not telling all the facts. and leave a comment about it.
loosechangeexposed 5 days ago
so what about building 7 whats your take on that?
woodstockbc 5 days ago
@woodstockbc it wasn't only the towers and building 7 that were destroyed, the fall out of the towers was so widespread that 8 buildings were destroyed from the fallout besides the towers, if you google "ground zero then and now" you can click on each building and see the before, the after math and the future of each one, here is one of my videos showing footage of how the towers collapses did destroy wtc 7
/watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
loosechangeexposed 5 days ago
There is nothing scientific in your videos, no research, just your guessing and your view, You are a fake nutjob/ i bet you wont show this comment
774stefan 5 days ago
@774stefan here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up, it is proof that they did cut the steel during clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
where is your proof that it was cut to bring down the towers? not what other people said about it where is the hard core evidence that was left behind?
loosechangeexposed 5 days ago
This is nothing more than your opinion. Nothing scientific. Now if you had a picture of steal being cut that's a different story. You have no date or proof. Silly really. While you at it, let's here your "opinion" on why the steal was removed before it could be forensically tested.
fukademous 5 days ago
@fukademous here is a video where i got my information.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
is 2 guys talking about cutting the steel during clean up proof enough for you?
loosechangeexposed 5 days ago
This guy needs to go smoke another one.... He sounds like he knows NOTHING, LOL
OG905EsC 6 days ago
@OG905EsC i sound like i know nothing? i am explaining how the steel that was cut at the WTC was cut during clean up and not to bring down the towers, how do i know? and how can i prove it? well i am glad you asked, here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
that is what you call proof, something the conspiracy theory movement doesn't have, where is the evidence of explosives besides what you heard (hearsay) from other truthers?
loosechangeexposed 5 days ago
typical idiotic american, all the videos, live news reporters showing these attacks, normal been with their cams saw these planes hit, blow up, hit wtc2 and blew up, we all seen them fall but no ,like JFK!! you dicks from america make it a conspiricy., your idiotic videos are bull, there is no proof here you knob head, who cares about steal been cut you dick, it was terrorism and horrible but you dicks always show it worse then it always are. research yourselves and the crap you cunts talk. dick
joejoe2308 1 week ago
@joejoe2308 i titled this video the way i did cuz i knew it would have truthers looking to find any evidence they could, in this video i explain how the steel was cut during clean up and not to take down the towers, watch the video this time and see what i talk about then watch this video>> /watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0 to see that it is proof of the steel being cut by workers during clean up.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
one question if thermite cant cut through steel why does the army use it for bombs plus thermite can cut through steel and thermite residue was found at the WTC.
EnviousKryptic 1 week ago
@EnviousKryptic thermite is a good incindiary material, it's like gunpowder, once ignited it is hard to stop.
what was found was elements of what makes up thermite, iron and aluminum.
the towers were made of iron and the planes aluminum, the 2 materials were fused togeather in the impacts, fires, and collapses, the planes explosions not setting of thermite and dropping the towers right away is key
check out my video how the towers fell it explains exactly how the towers came down
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
@EnviousKryptic The Army does not use it for bombs. They have grenades that the drop down the tube of a gun or set on an engine block. You don't even have to go all the way through the metal.
The "thermite residue" that chucklenuts Jones found was paint. Any welder will also tell you that it behaves the way that pint does when you hit it with a torch.
leftysergeant 1 week ago
@leftysergeant it's funny how even when truthers make shit up i know how to explain how they are wrong, it's like a game of chess and i am 5 steps ahead of all of them.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
lets see the video of the workers cutting the beams like this. there has to be at least one video of it. how bout a still photo of workers torching the steel beems?
shotgunpsycho 1 week ago
@shotgunpsycho here is a video of workers talking about cutting the steel, you can see that the square steel is what made up the exterior and that is the only type of pics of cut steel at the WTC anywhere on the internet.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
here is a video with a still pic of a guy cutting a huge steel I beam, it was I beam construction that made up the cores.
/watch?v=5VskSiHS1r0&feature=related
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
Holy shit, finally someone w LOGIC! Thank you for these kind of videos. I used to be a "truther", but when I did my own research and used logic I seen that none of the theories make ANY sense. You're the only one, besides me, I've heard talk about the plane hitting then setting off the thermite or charges on impact, which would've resulted in an immediate collapse. Also the Loose Change guys made the original LC as a project for bullshit, which resulted in them becoming "famous". Thanks again..
BlakGlasses 1 week ago
@BlakGlasses always happy to hear from someone who use to believe people like loose change cuz if their friends still believe it they can show them some videos that explain what happened without hiding key information.
i have 3 videos in my uploads that shows exactly what happened to the towers and wtc 7.
"how the towers fell"
"WTC 7 the hidden truth"
and this one expoese jason bermis of loose change for a cover up.
"sept 11th the smoking gun"
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
@tony3th 40 story building, 22 floors compromised from the collapse of the towers. Fires on ALL 40 floors. The building had 3 supporting trusses, 1 (maybe 2) of which were destroyed. Collapsed happened. Easy answer buddy, do the research and don't ignore the facts.
BlakGlasses 1 week ago
@BlakGlasses here is footage of WTC 7 that truthers don't want anyone to see.
/watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
my video "how the towers fell" goes into details of the anatomy of those collapses, those 2 videos shut down any controlled demolition theory.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
@BlakGlasses here is footage of WTC 7 that truthers don't want anyone to see.
/watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
my video "how the towers fell" goes into details of the anatomy of those collapses, those 2 videos shut down any controlled demolition theory.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
Yes I totally agree with this theory! I personally think one of the secretaries on the 80th floor used her scissors to cut the steel away. Don't forget the steel was very hot, which made it softer, so I'm sure she was able to cut it with scissors, or maybe it was a group of secretaries. What a complete dumb ass!
jasonr71 1 week ago
@jasonr71 this is not a theory, the steel was cut during clean up, here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting it.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
that is what you call proof, i made a video about how the steel was cut during clean up then i proved it to you with a video of the guys talking about cutting it.
you can see how it was a conspiracy when you ignore all the evidence. you people have nothing but hopes and wishes, try finding a geanie in a bottle then you can make it true.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
@loosechangeexposed 4 huge boeings fly low over crowded cities at rush hour, no one believes it, but im sure theres loads of cctv of this, please forward link of vid that shows JUST ONE AIRLINER WITH ITS TAIL COLOURS, don't innundate us, we're sure theres loads, just send link to one, if you can....should we even expect an answer herre??? stupid COINTELPRO SHILL???
wellifthemediasaysit 1 week ago
@wellifthemediasaysit flight 93 went down in PA. it did not fly low over any crowded city, flight 77 hit the pentagon it came in from the west and did not fly low untill it dropped out of the sky on final approach, it did not fly low over a major city, flight 11 hit the north tower, there is video of that happening, many people believe it, even you do, flight 175 hit the south tower there are many videos, when you ignore all the evidence you can make it what you want.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
@loosechangeexposed 'flight this hit that...etc'...wow, rock solid evidence there shill, no wonder you moderate posts, you are being destroyed left right and centre, not one vid shows an airliner, all you parrot is 'my video (someone elses) pwooves this, pwooves that, sheer desperation eh shill, COINTELPRO only get what they pay for i guess!! 9/11 was still an inside job, i can hit 100 vids, before your shift starts in the morning!!
wellifthemediasaysit 1 week ago
@wellifthemediasaysit i notice that not one of your comments prove one of my videos wrong, you post propaganda you heard from other people, this video is about how the steel was cut during clean up, and here is 2 workers talking about cutting it.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
i you think i am wrong then prove every one of my videos wrong, the way i broke loose change up into 227 parts and prove every part wrong.
start with my video "how the towers fell" you will learn something.
loosechangeexposed 6 days ago
I know willy knilly .. hes a funny sob
onebadbncr 1 week ago
I don't see how you can be so simple minded but I do have one question for you. Why did building 7 fall? Please answer with as little bullshit as possible. If possible.
tony3th 1 week ago
@tony3th my video "WTC 7 the hidden truth" shows details and facts that truthers will never tell you.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
loll you right a book!?! i tink you juste want make money from the dead of other , lol a book !
SuperMadmax2000 1 week ago
@SuperMadmax2000 your comment is just like every other truther comment, it is what you think and not what you prove, just like every claim made by the lie movement.
i started out making a rebutal video to loose change but had way too much against them so i needed to write a book, many of my videos are excerpts from the book, and if you think i am in it for the money (which is why loose change did their video) go to my website and read about the 9/11 victims charity store.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
the real question is when exactly this photo was taken!!!!!????
joperk2 1 week ago
@joperk2 it is obvious that it was taken after the towers were down, here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
to sum up on the truthers vs shills debate, one side now has 1000s of architects, engineers, actors, sportsmen, politicians, and millions of citizens, as well as the laws of physics, common sense, and what their eyes and ears tell them....the other side is a few abusive people who exist only on the internet, with several usernames, whose only answers to normal questions about 9/11 are filled with 'twooftard, asstard, lol, lmfao, twoofie' etc, i wonder which side is most believable?
wellifthemediasaysit 1 week ago
@wellifthemediasaysit the side that has proof.
in over 10 years 9/11 has not been proven to have been a conspiracy, if it was there would be at least 1 person in prison for it, the entire movement is based on hearsay, rumors, speculations, and opinions, not evidence or proof. the following video is evidence of a cover up by a 9/11 truther, twisting what he needs to make it look like he is right, but the video tells what he does not, all the facts. /watch?v=E1FTx-PhW_s
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
@loosechangeexposed there's no way to get a trial because its their court system
WheresMyUSA 1 week ago
@WheresMyUSA this is a country by the people for the people of the people, the polititions and government work for the people, if enough people sign petitions they have to listen, you believe truthers that say there will never be a new investigation who use that excuse to say the govt is hiding the truth, they don't want a new investigation cuz if there was evidence out there they themselves would have found it. my video "sept 11th the smoking gun" proves they are the real cover up.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
well yea thats the thing. wheres the petitions at. ill sign em all but its not very common to find any information at all in comments here at least about that
WheresMyUSA 1 week ago
@WheresMyUSA go to prisonplanet website or infowarrior website and ask how to get it done.
let me know if they get back to you.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?
If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?
How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?
ctcole77 1 week ago
@ctcole77 i have 3 videos that destroy any conspiracy theory. you can find all of them in my uploads.
"how the towers fell"
"WTC 7 the hidden truth"
"sept 11th the smoking gun"
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
@loosechangeexposed
I've seen your videos.
911 twoof doesn't have a chance!
911 was an OUTSIDE job!
ctcole77 1 week ago
@ctcole77 1.Top-down controlled demolition.The 90 undamaged floors below the impact zone "failed" too i.e.exploded into dust in midair.2.The planes were remote controlled,they knew where they would impact.Thermitic reactions were video recorded in the impact zone of the South Tower.Explosives that can't be detonated by fire,like C-4,could have also been used.3.AlJazeera is British Intelligence.KSM "confessed" in 2007 after 6 months of torture and the threat of his kids being tortured.
fakeyf9 6 days ago
@fakeyf9 when the top of the so. tower fell over to the side it was hit just before collapse it is proof that the steel on that side was destroyed by the impact (the no. tower suffered the same type of damage) the fires weakened the undestroyed steel to the point it could no longer support the weight of the structure above each impact zone, this is why the so. tower fell 1st (more weight to support) my video "how the towers fell" goes into all the details.
cont next post
loosechangeexposed 6 days ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post.
there was about half the weight above the impact zone in the no. tower so it took about twice as long to weaken the undestroyed steel in that tower.
the planes created static electricity from the friction and also severed the buildings electrical wiring which made contact with the core steel, that would have set off any devices that would have needed to be attached directly to the steel in order to destroy it.
cont next post.
loosechangeexposed 6 days ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post.
the thermatic reaction you talk about was not steel because if any steel was melted by thermite the entire floor truthers claim was set up with thermite would have needed to be tied into a sequence, thermite is activated by fire and the planes explosions would have set it off and started the collapses upon impact and even you know that didn't happen.
cont next post
loosechangeexposed 6 days ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post.
the thermatic reaction you talk about was the aluminum from the plane, it has a lower melting point than steel, the fires burned at about 2000 deg, not hot enough to melt steel (and the fires would have set off any thermite seeing how it is activated by fire and other thermite it is connected to) but it was hot enough to weaken the undestroyed steel, and was hot enough to melt the aluminum plane.
cont next post.
loosechangeexposed 6 days ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post.
if the planes were remote controlled where are the ones they say crashed that day? and where are all the people? they identified all the passengers at the pentagon. if they were the planes and they were also remote controlled why do we have all this evidence of terrorists going to our flight schools, the video of them boarding the planes, my video "how the towers fell" explains the collapses and can't be proven wrong. give it a try.
loosechangeexposed 6 days ago
nobody cut the fucking beams dumbass
BloodyDragonStudios 1 week ago
@BloodyDragonStudios oh, so you didn't find any proof that the steel was cut by workers so you conclude that the steel wasn't cut by anyone? what about this video that has 2 workers talking about cutting the steel?>> /watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
Typical government defender, your video is a joke. You are not an expert and obviously have no real facts. I could disprove every single thing you say with actual facts. Also did you forget the bulding was designed to withstand MULTIPLE airliner strikes at the same time.
StickHits 1 week ago
@StickHits is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up real facts? /watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0 or do you only take the word of witnesses who don't know what they heard and make that look like explosives? parts of the building falling apart sounded like explosions. yes the towers did withstand the plane impacts, it was the fires weakening the undestroyed steel and the weight above each impact zone that caused the collapses, why do you think the so. tower fell 1st?
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
This Moron wrote a book ? LOL !
januseski 1 week ago
@januseski if i was a moron then why can't you prove every one of my videos wrong? you didn't even prove this one wrong, here is where i got my information that shows the steel was cut during clean up which also shows that i have more evidence that the steel was cut during clean up than you have of a controlled demolition.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
that video is evidence that my comment just proved that your comment is propaganda.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
@januseski the best book for go to toillet and use it fot T.P :)
SuperMadmax2000 1 week ago
@SuperMadmax2000 and what is the name of your book? did you write it on T.P. just for that reason?
loosechangeexposed 5 days ago
The towers fell at the speed of fucking GRAVITY!! Stop investigating the aftermath and research what really matters. Logically those towers would have fallen floor by floor with each floor slowing down the collapse, which is not the case here. Watch the videos in real time and you'll see that the towers were in a freefall. Simple as that.... Boom Bitch!
BigRuben205 1 week ago
@BigRuben205 what caused the collapses of the towers was not the steel snapping but the nuts, bolts, and rivetts that held the steel togeather, what started the collapses was the fires weakening the steel that was not destroyed by the plane and the weight above each impact zone, that is why the so. tower fell 1st (more weight) my video "how the towers fell" explains all the details.
your comment has been documented, it is a violation of the user agreement to call someone a bitch.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
@loosechangeexposed Damn, you sure got me...
BigRuben205 1 week ago
@BigRuben205 one more comment like that and i will have got you.
loosechangeexposed 5 days ago
I'm sorry I just have a hard time buying that fire alone makes these structures weaken and fail. Especially building 7. I'm not a conspiracy wacko but it seems strange
thunderbirdlver 1 week ago
@thunderbirdlver my video "how the towers fell" explains the details of how it was the initial damage to the cores, the fires WEAKENING not MELTING the undestroyed steel to the point it could no longer support the weight above each impact point, which is why the so. tower fell 1st, more weight to support.
there was about twice as much weight above the impact zone of the so. tower and it fell about twice as soon as the north tower did.
my featured video explains wtc 7.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
LOL, ZIONITS VIDEO AND GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU JEW FAGGOT.
glower125 1 week ago
@glower125 here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up,
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
let me debate you in front of your girl, when i destroy you she will let you know i am not a faggot.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
They fell at free-fall speed. You can see blasting charges going down as the towers collapsed. Whatever you think happened, these were the first steel and concrete buildings to fall from fire, ever. Even with some upper floors weakened, the towers fell in a manner like it they were professionally demolished. The South Tower was especially odd, because the plane didn't even hit in the middle, and a lot lower. The top should have just fell over.
timramich 1 week ago
@timramich truthers tell you that the fires could not have taken down the towers but they are not telling all the facts, NO the fires did NOT get hot enough to MELT the steel, what they don't tell you is they DID get hot enough to WEAKEN the steel that was undestroyed by the planes impacts, the weight above each impact zone dictated when the steel would be weak enough to fail, that is why the so. tower fell 1st. my video "how the towers fell" explains all the details. leave a comment.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
@timramich "Whatever you think happened, these were the first steel and concrete buildings to fall from fire, ever."
Uh..........These are also the first 110 story skyscrapers to be hit full speed, by fuel-loaded passenger jets, EVER.
Fuck people are stupid.
Holymakinaw 1 week ago
@Holymakinaw my video "how the towers fell" explains the details of how it was the initial damage to the cores, the fires WEAKENING not MELTING the undestroyed steel to the point it could no longer support the weight above each impact point, which is why the so. tower fell 1st, more weight to support.
there was about twice as much weight above the impact zone of the so. tower and it fell about twice as soon as the north tower did.
my featured video explains wtc 7.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
You are an idiot. You have a "theory" and have not proved anything. Why dont you call the DOD and ask for the 100 tons of rubble they shipped to China and had melted down. Why cant we see if that steel REALLY melted as a result of jet fuel. After all if the 9/11 Commissino Report is true and you say no conspiracy occured then where is the transparency by the government. Why dont you look up Susan Lindauer and tell her she is a fraud? Do you know her story and what she knew prior to Sept 11?
NorthSider244 1 week ago
@NorthSider244 truthers tell you the fires could not have destroyed the towers but they are not telling all the facts, NO the fires did NOT get hot enough to MELT the steel, what they don't tell you is they DID get hot enough to WEAKEN the steel that was undestroyed by the impacts, the weight above each impact zone dictated when the steel would be weak enough to fail, that is why the so. tower fell 1st. my video "how the towers fell" explains all the details. leave a comment.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
also explain how tower 7 collapsed yet 3, 4, 5 and 6 didnt and 2 of those buildings were completely gutted by fire. uh oh
blueeyedguy86 1 week ago
@blueeyedguy86 my video "how the towers fell" explains how it was the fires weakening the steel that was undestroyed by the planes along with the weight above each impact zone which caused the collapses.
this video explains wtc7>> /watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
after hours of fires in wtc 7 the structure could no longer support the weight of 47 storys and failed, the reason those other buildings didn't fall is there was no weight left.
it wasn't just fire, there was more to it than that.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
conspiracy theorists, learn a trade. this steel was clearly cut by an Oxygene-Acetylene torch.
logic dictates (if youve ever been inside a building) that its kind of hard to access the structural steel components of a building without removing the interior of it, ie: the walls. and if you did this to a beam it would collapse right away, not wait until the exact right moment. fucking idiots, now i have to close youtube. thanks to you morons, im pissed off.
isSHEEPMANimmortal 2 weeks ago
@isSHEEPMANimmortal i titled the video what i did to lure truthers in and it worked, look at the view count, way more views than any other video i have. it proves they are desperate to find anything. i know the steel was cut during clean up here is a video of where i got that info.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
I believe 100%, that 9/11 was a inside job
MrJuniorMint 2 weeks ago
@MrJuniorMint what is 1 thing about it that makes you believe inside job?
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
@loosechangeexposed because in a gravity driven collapse the speed would have decreased not increased. The collapse increased and maintained speed, if it was going through the greatest path of resistance it was have deaccelerated.
vibeackermann 1 week ago
@vibeackermann the greatest points of resistance was not the steel but the nuts, bolts, and rivets that held the steel togeather,
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
You are too obseesed with exposing Loose Change and are confusing this with your stated goal of disproving a conspiracy...it is nobody's job to disprove your conjecture - it is everybody's job to simply seek the truth.
JusticeSpringChicken 2 weeks ago
@JusticeSpringChicken i transcribed every word in the video loose change into 227 parts and answered each part, that is the content of my book, i then took parts and turned them into these videos, if you think i am too obsessed with loose change it's only because i have so many videos where i prove them wrong, i prove them wrong 100% of their video, i have other videos too like proving wrong alex jones, jesse ventura, richard gage. see how many you agree with.
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
The steel in that picture is cut on a perfect 45 degree angle. the video of the 2 men talking about cutting the beams then shows an image of ruff cut steel with what looks like a 15 degree angle. u don’t cut vertical beams at 45 degree because it wont fall like a tree like you claim it will slide too close to the person cutting. but the main reason you don’t cut at 45 degree is because the cut is too long too time consuming too expensive. am not saying 911 was an inside job but it stinks!
dagaffaman 2 weeks ago
@dagaffaman here is the video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
notice that the steel is square? it made up the exterior, so where are all the pictures of I beams that were in the cores? and you just put it into perspective for everyone, you said "time consuming too expensive" how long would it take to cut the steel in 267 floors of wtc 1, 2, and 7? and how would the steel on the 1st 10 floors support the weight of over 100 floors?
loosechangeexposed 1 week ago
but it was an ariel shot
cablemanization 2 weeks ago
@cablemanization here is a video showing a shot of ground zero up close while 2 workers talk about cutting the steel during clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
all demolition teams cut steel this way,larry silverstein had it demolished to make money on his insurance scheme on the towers,mossad was involved too,typical jews controlling america via media and finances
Cyrax181 2 weeks ago
@Cyrax181 here is a video of wtc 7, notice that the firefighters say they knew the building would collapse due to the damage suffered by the collapsing towers and the raging fires inside, it was the firefighters assesment of that building that showed it would fall long before it did, if it was a planned demolition they would have said they didn't expect it to fall, or do you think the fdny were also part of the scheme?
/watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
@loosechangeexposed I believe all 3 buildings were rigged with explosives,Israels mossad and larry silverstein were behind the attacks,they have managed to manipulate the American government and people into thinking it was the work of Osama by using the jewish owned media in America, Bush knew the attacks would happen too but it gives him the thumbs up to go and get the oil . Israel wants America and her allies to fight Muslim countries in the middle east that hate Israel , cool vid too :)
Cyrax181 2 weeks ago
@Cyrax181 your entire comment is based on the propaganda spread by the truthers who made videos, wrote books, and speak in public. they keep the lies going for the money. i have many videos that expose the lie movement and prove that explosives were not possible, if you know the truth then it should be easy for you to prove every one of my videos wrong. try these
sept 11th the smoking gun
how the towers fell
wtc 7 the hidden truth
also answer the question on the top of my channel page.
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
What was those unknown workers doing on that level all day before the attack? No one in WT knew the details what they were doing or where allowed to see!
CliveGains80s 2 weeks ago
@CliveGains80s do you think they cut that steel the same day? no, the rescue efforts went on for days before they could start the clean up, here is a 2 minute video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
notice the cranes and equipment in the background? how long did it take to set it up? and if the steel was cut to collapse the towers, why would they need to cut it? wouldn't they have just put it on trucks and hauled it away?
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
You can cut 90% of the steel the building well still stand. But that last 10 % make it easy take out after that. How do you that take building down on demo. First pre cut the steel. And jet fuel fire is not hot enought to burn steel. The older steel works are better than todays steel build buildings.
cadman311 2 weeks ago
@cadman311 if the steel was cut and explosives were used why was the fallout of the towers so wide spread? wouldn't all the momentum have been taken away? wouldn't there have been a lot more steel that was cut at the scene? here is a video showing 2 guys talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
how long would it take to cut all the steel and set up for explosives? why didn't the planes impacts set off the explosives?
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
I guess all the architects for truth,engineers for truth, fireman for truth, pilots for truth, even the 9 of ten NIST guys that claim the investigation was hindered and controlled. after all, building 7 isnt even in the report. also, NO skyscrapers EVER fell do to fire, in HISTORY, before this. Until you can argue with those professionals, & experts that say you're an idiot, you will remain an idiot. conspiracy theories are how crimes are solved, it doesnt make the theorist crazy or not valid.
2skullscrushing 2 weeks ago
@2skullscrushing my video "how the towers fell" proves that even a 3rd grader can explain how the 9/11 conspiracy theory movement can't prove that the planes didn't take down the towers.
if you believe the conspiracy theory movement is right then you should be able to explain how each and every one of my videos are wrong, start with this one, explain where the proof is that the steel was cut to bring down the towers, here is a video of the clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
Just looked at the video that you suggested, the cut angle is a lot different, the video that you pointed too is a very shallow angle, the steel is not just allowed to fall, the shallow angle is safe for this. The angle of the cut steel 45deg on this video, the same angle used in controlled demolition so it slides smoothly, no one with a cutting torch is going to cut a 45deg angle into a free standing piece of steel, they aren't that stupid. Open your eyes and wake up my friend....
EvRevDesigns 2 weeks ago
@EvRevDesigns i present proof that the steel was cut during clean up, here is the video to make sure you got the right one.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
so you ignore video evidence? where is the evidence of explosives? i have a question. how did they plant explosives in the towers so that the planes impacts wouldn't set them off, remember there were fireballs, static electricity and the towers severed electrical wiring which one of would have set them off but didn't you even know that.
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
@loosechangeexposed Look we can go round and round with these augments.... I generally don't argue with people anymore because it goes no where. What I say to people is watch the 3 buildings collapse, clear your mind of the emotion and let your eyes tell you what the truth is and after that make your own mind up....
EvRevDesigns 2 weeks ago
@EvRevDesigns this video explains how the steel was cut during clean up, i also posted a link to the video where is got that info from, it is the video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up. can you at least admit that some of the steel was cut during clean up based on the evidence i presented to you?
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
GOOGLE - 911 MISSINGLINKS ALL THE INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT REALLY HAPPENED IS THERE.
Cyrax181 2 weeks ago
@Cyrax181 that is a site of a conspiracy theorist, all sites like that are based on propaganda, no real proof or evidence, if it was creditable there would be people in jail. truthers have calims that the gov't is covering up, but never produce any real proof.
i claim that truthers are the ones who are lying, hiding evidence and twist what they tell you into what they need to believe, here is my video proving that 1 truther is involved in a cover up and i have more
/watch?v=E1FTx-PhW_s
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
Conspiracy theorists tell you what you want to hear? So basically exacly the same as your doing, telling the conspiracy denialists what they want to hear.
Get over yourself dude, more people in the world believe it was inside jobrather than a terrorist attack.
gunmanscotland 2 weeks ago
@gunmanscotland conspiracy theorists tell you what to believe based on what they heard from other people, none of them provide real evidence, this video explains how the steel was cut during clean up, and here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
evidence that the steel was cut during clean up>>> /watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
evidence that the steel was cut to bring down the towers>>> ???
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
your a dumb ass, you don't cut steel like you cut a tree! WTF having a guy cutting a notch and shouting timber? Really? Moron....
EvRevDesigns 2 weeks ago
@EvRevDesigns the steel was cut at an angle so it would fall in a certain direction so it wouldn't hit or hurt anyone, you can try and make me look as dumb as you want to try to discredit me but i am on to every trick truthers attempt and none of you are as smart as me, i notice that you failed to prove this video wrong, before you try again look at the video of the 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
So kerosene dropped the twin towers and building 7 collapsed out of sympathy?
McNihilation 2 weeks ago
@McNihilation not just kerosene, this video tells all the elements of the collapses of the towers>>> /watch?v=ywHW5UewN8A
truthers are the only ones that say the fires by themselves could not have taken down the towers and they are right. it was more than just the fires.
this video explains what really happened to wtc 7>>> /watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
google "ground zero then and now" to see just how many buildings were destroyed by the towers collapses. every wtc building.
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
@McNihilation not just kerosene, this video tells all the elements of the collapses of the towers>>> /watch?v=ywHW5UewN8A
truthers are the only ones that say the fires by themselves could not have taken down the towers and they are right. it was more than just the fires.
this video explains what really happened to wtc 7>>> /watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
google "ground zero then and now" to see just how many buildings were destroyed by the towers collapses. every wtc building.
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
This coment is to prove you talk out your ass. Try watching some controlled demolitions being prepared. Then you will see all this "Sliced Steel" talk, is you trying to sound intellegent. You prove nothing here what so ever except that a photograph was taken of a steel cut bar. Can you prove this picture came from the 9/11 wreckage? I think not.
ReganVisitation 2 weeks ago
@ReganVisitation you may be misunderstanding this video, i titled it to see if it would get truthers to prove they are desperate to find evidence of controlled demo and it worked, look at the view count, way more than any other video i have, i say in the video that the steel was cut during clean up, here is a video of 2 workers talking about it.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
and yes you can see that the steel in this video is in the footage.
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
hello what about larry silverstein? he seems like he had tons of motive?
shanebrain 2 weeks ago
@shanebrain this video should clear things up about wtc 7 and larry.
/watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
First off, YOU IGNORAMUS! Unless you're the steel worker that cut it, or happened to be standing there watching who did, per explanation. Its impossible to say with absolute 100% certainty when, why, how, or whom cut or didnt cut the steel pictured. ERGO... Most arguments are based not on hard evidence from FIRST hand Knowledge. Without eyeball proof, Its 1prt speculative, 1prt editorializing [opinion], with a cover-up topping, & bit of conspiracy theory thrown in for good measure. Nothing more!
7467277 2 weeks ago
@7467277 how about the video where i got the info of the workers cutting the steel during clean up. it's less than 2 minutes.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
So jetfuel weakened the steel on the 70th floor, but also weakened all the steel equally throughout the building so it fell perfectly, and on both buildings, what about wtc7?
shorfilmman 2 weeks ago
@shorfilmman here is a video i made explaining how the towers were brought down by the planes.
/watch?v=ywHW5UewN8A
the fires weakened the undestroyed steel at the impact zones, to the point it could no longer support the above weight, it was the weight that hit the floor below and snapped bolts and rivetts that held the steel togeather, floor after floor as more weight was added.
here is a video explaining the hidden truth about wtc 7.
/watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
@loosechangeexposed EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS NO VIDEO OF THE PLANES TAKING OFF FROM THEIR ORIGINAL AIRPORTS... EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS NO PICTURES OF THE ACTUAL PLANES TO COMPARE TO THE VIDEOS OF THEM HITTING... EXPLAIN WHY THE GOVERNMENT SPENT MORE MONEY TO INVESTIGATE CLINTON GETTING HIS DICK SUCKED COMPARED TO WHAT THEY SPENT ON INVESTIGATING OVER 3000 PEOPLE DYING... EXPLAIN?
MrRaptur3 2 weeks ago
@MrRaptur3 do you think they video record and document every plane that takes off? do you know that would be impossible and very costly? there is footage of the terrorists boarding the planes. the gov't spent more money on the clinton investigation cuz they were lied to by him and didn't know who to believe, they didn't waste a lot of money on investigating the attacks because the evidence shows that it happened the way we all saw it.
cont next post
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post
so much for being able to cover up the attacks when they couldn't even cover up the clinton scandel if you notice the mainstream media makes Obama (democrat) look good while trying to discredit the GOP (republicans) why couldn't the media expose Bush (republican)
why doesn't the truth movement pay for a new investigation with the money they made from their books and videos? cuz they know that they didn't find any evidence
cont next post
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post
the lie movement will not pay for a new investigation cuz they know the people they hire will not find anything new cuz they themselves would have found it by now, that and it is their money they made from the bogus claims in the books and videos they wrote, but if the govt pays for a new investigation and when they don't find any new evidence that shows conspiracy, truthers will say the investigators were paid off.
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
quenced and their purpose is to control the oute@loosechangeexposed I would love to hear your explanation about the numerous squibs evidenced in every video of the collapse of towers 1, 2 and 7. Squibs are sequenced to control the outer part of the building during the fall. essentially they negate side slip, an inevitable consequence of a pancake collapse. No credible demolition expert would testify under oath that building 1, 2 or 7 were pancake collapses.
andrew75056 2 weeks ago
@andrew75056 i sometimes refer people to videos that explain better and in less space than a text post what they ask about, i did make a video, you can find it in my uploads, titled "loose change answer number 138" it explains the squibs.
the video (not mine) "miracle in stairwell B" where 14 people survived inside the no. tower, 13 of who were firemen, a few say you could hear the floors hitting 1 on top of the other, one even says the term "PANCAKE EFFECT"
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post
there was about twice as much weight above the impact zone in the so. tower than there was above the impact zone in the no. tower. and the no. tower took about twice as long for the steel to weaken to the point of collapse.
it wasn't so much the steel failing, it was more like the bolts and rivets that held the steel togeather that failed.
here is a video showing the truth about wtc 7,
/watch?v=ud87BgQmzio
cont next post
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post
that video shows that the fdny knew wtc 7 would collapse, the only way they would know it would and also be from explosives is to have been told it was rigged to collapse, wouldn't the fdny and media blow the whistle or risk being part of mass murder? the mass murder which included 343 of the fdny.
the entire 9/11 conspiracy theory movement is based on hearsay, rumors, speculations, and opinions. just like your comment.
cont next post.
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post
here is a video exposing part of the truth movement in a lie.
/watch?v=w-XD7P7m0Ug&feature=related
here is a video exposing a truther in a cover up.
/watch?v=E1FTx-PhW_s
look thru my videos you will notice that you will only have questions that show you are in denial, you will never be able to prove me wrong cuz you believe liars and scumbags.
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
what about the architechts and physicists who say it is impossible for the building to fall at freefall speed? Yes, alot of falling weight above where the planes hit, but over 80 floors of good steel beneath to slow it down too? That alone kills the "pancake" theory, it would have lost speed and monentum, not gained it. WTC 7,? steel framed buildings dont fall from fire, never once in history, until 9/11 when 3 of them fell. And what about the smaller ones right next to 1&2? those didnt collapse
MrDANNYUNDERWOODky 2 weeks ago
@MrDANNYUNDERWOODky here is why they are lying, books, videos, and speaches about conspiracy make more money than the truth, they are lying to make money, here is how i can explain they are lying, nobody but truthers say the buildings fell due to fire, it was the initial damage the fires weakening the undestroyed steel and the weight above each impact zone that caused the collapses of the towers, here is a video explaining it.
/watch?v=ywHW5UewN8A
cont next post
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
Ok...makes sense...so your saying that the showers of molten steel seen on some videos and the rivers of molten steel reported by some Firefighters was caused by the plane fuel?...or...???
lusthawk1 2 weeks ago
@lusthawk1 the molten metal in the upper floors was molten aluminum from the planes, it has a lower melting point than steel does, if it was steel at that height the rest of the steel would have been so weak at that point that the building would have been collapsing, the jet fuel burned at 2000 deg not hot enough to melt the steel but was hot enough to weaken the steel to the pointn of structural failure
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
No Thermite?...Hmmm...So the Engineers for 911 truth are lying about finding the Thermite signature in the dust?
lusthawk1 2 weeks ago
@lusthawk1 no they are not lying about finding something they found elements of thermite which is iron and aluminum, there was iron in the towers and the planes made of aluminum, the 2 materials fused togeather in the impacts, fires and collapses.
thermite is activated by fire and the planes explosions didn't set it off and drop the towers right away? they are saying it was thermite cuz those stories pay more money that the facts do here is what they wont tell you
/watch?v=ywHW5UewN8A
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
so how come your government cant do anything about it,, its so obvious..maybe u got a stupid idiotic government like homer simpson as ur president...
rommel7tech 2 weeks ago
@rommel7tech wouldn't that be "homie" simpson?
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
Also, the cuts look jagged, which wouldn't be so if some type of cutting device, or charge was used. The characteristics of the cuts point to a person cutting them, which would be impossible to achieve pre-collapse.
MrSkunkwork100 2 weeks ago
One point I would like to make here, is that if these pictures of the angle-cut steel was really evidence that they cut the steel and caused the collapses of the buildings, wouldn't some of the slag be scraped off the cut surface as the building collapses? In other words: wouldn't the movement of the column segment above the cut act like a spatula and scrape the slag off?
MrSkunkwork100 2 weeks ago
that was snapped dumb ass
armyhobo12 3 weeks ago
@armyhobo12 so what about the video of the 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up? they show footage of what they cut in the video.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
loosechangeexposed 3 weeks ago
We work on demo building we would pre cut parts the steel first. They would look the same way before they would blow the smaller part of steel to do the job. To me that looks like torched steel.
cadman311 3 weeks ago
@cadman311 are you saying that all the steel was cut some way thru before the collapses? wouldn't the weight of 100 floors cause it to fail if part of the steel was cut on the 10 lower floors? where is your proof of the steel being cut before the collapses? here is my proof that it was cut during the clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
loosechangeexposed 3 weeks ago
It was those planes dude....get over it. Metal bends too... especially when it's very hot. The only ones responsible for this was those terrorist. You sound like an anarchist who loves to blame America.
suckonthisyo 3 weeks ago
@suckonthisyo your comment suggests that you didn't watch the video, i explain in the video that i have proof that the steel was cut during clean up, here is a video of 2 workers talking about it.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
i named the video what i did cuz i knew that truthers would be drawn to it looking for evidence (which they don't have and are desperate to find) i was right just look at the view count compared to every other video i have.
loosechangeexposed 2 weeks ago
how would they get that picture any way if nobody but police and firemen where let in at ground zero?????
cablemanization 3 weeks ago
@cablemanization workers were let in to do clean up, if it was a cover up no one would have been allowed in with a camera, and if you think this pic was taken by someone who was in on it why would they release it?
here is a video of 2 workers talking about cutting the steel during clean up.
/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
loosechangeexposed 3 weeks ago
The beams in the video are cut during cleanup work. There are more photo's from the series this photographer made. If you see them all, you understand it's cleanup work. There are also video's of worker burning through the steel, all during cleanup.