Yes, all of science is "to the best of our knowledge". So what? The typical point being made by a theist who says that is to accuse science of not really knowing for sure about everything, followed immediately by the non sequitur of "then god must have done it". Science is the best tool we have for understanding the universe. It is self-correcting over time as more progess is made. Throwing up our hands and saying "god did it" is just a lazy copout.
The problem with this theory of the origin of the universe is that it relies on quantum mechanics, not because quantum mechanics is a shaky theory, but because it has so many facets which defy common sense here in the macro-world. If the typical theist can, with a straight face, announce that evolution/natural selection is crap, in the face of all the tangible evidence for it, how much more impossible it would be to convince a theist that the universe could be no more than a quantum fluctuation!
I think people are getting bogged down in the semantics. No one is suggesting that literally nothing exists outside the universe and that everything came from that. Something from nothing is more to do with how the univesre was created from zero input as the universe is supposedly 'flat' and therefore it's positive and negative energies are balanced. I'm not religious but if a being willed our universe into existence it would seem that this was the mechanism that it used.
It's hard to imagine Something created from Nothing. But what created God? Maybe God is the same IDEA of Something created from Nothing. But I just don't think there is a God for very many reasons.
learn something about quantum mechanics.....something is created out of nothing all the time, all around us and within us...almost all of the time the somethings recombine and disappear again, going back to being "nothing" after a very short span of time, so short it probably makes a nanosecond look like a long time.....this is part of the core workings of the subatomic world....something ELSE you can mindlessly poopoo for being "only" a "theory"....
"Let's assert that some kind of space-time quantum foam sort of something existed before our own universe began." Sorry, but that is b.s. because you are positing that something ALREADY existed; it's not "nothing." This is a very lame way to begin this assertion and this is why creationists can always throw it back into an atheists face about the creation of the universe - simply, because we can't account for "something" out of "nothing."
@diegodann The way I understand it, we can and do label it as such, because whatever was there "before" our universe came into existence, it necessarily was not part of our universe. We define our universe as the sum of everything that exists. Nothing exists outside of it -> the universe, indeed, came from nothing.
It might be appropriate to encompass the unknown "before" the BB into our definition of the universe, though, and suddenly, it ceases to be a problem.
That very small amounts of matter can (and do) pop into existence "out of nothing" and exist in the universe VERY VERY briefly is one of the core ideas in quantum mechanics, the "new" theory in physics that sprang up in the 1920s-30s. Like other "theories", it has withstood the test of time. Much of the technology of the present day relies on quantum mechanics, including the computer I'm typing this into, lasers, all kinds of stuff. It's very real......
.....the idea in the video is merely an extension of this idea, and is fully compatible with quantum mechanics. It is quite possible the entire universe is merely a quantum fluctuation that appeared "out of nothing" and will, eventually, vanish just as abruptly. Some of the discoveries of quantum mechanics seem very bizarre, yet they, like those of relativity, have withstood scientific scrutiny and experimental verification.
The laws of physics break down when thinking about before the big bang. If scientists try to pretend they know what happened, they're no better than religious people.
@SuzLa1 Actually they're a lot better than religious people, for they admit that they don't know in the absence of evidence. And they continue to work on finding out the answer. Religious people make the claim that their holy books already provide the answer and dismiss all evidence that contradict their faith. For religion, the lesser the evidence, the more they believe it.
You are wrong. Though the video is tilted with a question mark, the video undoubtly speaks it as fact on how something came from nothing giving the thought they are right and know what happend.
They offer a possible explanation for how the universe came into existence that is completely compatible with a well-understood branch of physics known as quantum mechanics. The exact same sort of occurrence is known to happen at extremely small scales and is predicted to also possibly happen at larger scales, but more rarely, obviously, becoming rarer and rarer at larger and larger physical scales.
Which is why they don't "pretend", they hypothesize and then test their hypotheses to see if they pan out. It's not scientists who (without any reason or evidence to think so) make up mythical sky daddies who did everything, it's imaginationless theists who do that. The LATTER are the ones who are good at "pretending".
@SuzLa1 The whole video comes from a faulty assumption. "Let's assert that some kind of space-time quantum foam sort of something existed before our universe began." Other than this being very scientific, it still does not account for the origin of the space-time quantum foam sort of something. Did it create itself?
@satyestru it does not explain why it bang. It just says that something "negligibly small" (that amount of matter in that small space) can create the universe IF it bangs. As far as I know, there is a lot of evidence about the inflation theory, but its cause its still unknown. The point is that
furthermore just because particals disapear and appear does not mean its not the same partical thats entangled but simply passing on and out of dimensional space
The universe didn't come from nothing, because if there is truely nothing, then nothing can only cause nothing to happen. Also, this video has a misleading title, it says the universe came from nothing, yet you tell us to imagine something before the big bang, idiot
I'm saying that words like "immaterial" should not be used in this context. Matter/energy is all that exists and has always existed. The current shape/form of the universe is only one version of many possibilities. I hope this helps to clarify my point. :)
@ptij0404 This guy is right, energy and matter cannot be destroyed, or created, but only transformed into different forms, COME ON PEOPLE 4th GRADE SCIENCE
Listen up all you religious faithheads and spiritualists: The idea of a "god" is not an answer. It only makes things more complicated because then you have to explain what/who/where/when that "god" is. Just grow up and let it go! Science is the ONLY game that matters.
View my video, debates are welcome --- If the universe is expanding then what is it expanding into, through or towards?????? If the universe is expanding then LOGIC will tell you there is a border between the universes edge and the edge of NOTHINGNESS. If nothingness exists, then there has always been something existing. Something cannot come from nothingness. I have my video explaining this.
Not a bad video for those who understand modern cosmology I think. For those who don't (apparently, from the other comments) it just sounds like a big story. There is evidence for the universe beginning as a quantum fluctuation. Why don't you cover that? It's not THAT hard to simplify it for the sort of viewer who knows nothing about cosmology (and who has an iron in the fire theologically).
@AtheosRecords true although in saying that they just disprove their god as nothing can be created by nothing so there was nothing to create or use even if they insert a magic spirit in there. They also forget to mention both space and time expanded and are the same thing space/time, no expansion no space no time. But there was an infinite dense speck of matter so nothing came from nothing is the wrong argument. If they say where did this speck come from, well where did their god come from?
@Shadi1007 If something created the Universe, then we could follow that train of thought to ask: "What created that something"? If there was a first cause, then what caused the first cause? What caused that cause ad infinitum. It's an infinite regress and it's nauseating.
ABIOGENISIS = all life came from Rocks......it is the Foundation of "Evolution"....so.... if you believe this....your pet rock or space rocks will come to life and spawn millions of species.....Think...."Magic God Rocks"???...
Do The Math...Unlike People It Does Not Lie....
50,000,000,000,000 cells in a human.....3,500,000,000 years for "Magic Rock" to evolve to a human......."Magic Rockers"....It Is Time For A New Theory....
Postulating that a spec of matter x number of years ago eventually turned into our present day universe is no more outlandish than simply saying God created it.
So this is supposed to be the origins explanation - ex nihilo?!
Insanity has taken hold of these patented idiots.
Quantum fluctuation explanations are no explanations at all. All real scientists know this well.
HINT: Nothing means there is nothing to fluctuate - no energy existed before the universe existed, no laws existed um cause there was nothing you nitwits!!
Really; something from nothing? All you need is quantum foam or a god that always existed. Sorry but bull crap is bull crap; I don't care how pretty you make the package looks! :-)
You CANNOT pull something out of nothingness. The universe has always existed (not including the quantum foam stuff in this vid), and has never had a starting point of its creation. If the universe is expanding, then what is it expanding into??!!! There is no border between the universe and nothingness (which is on the other side of the border). Nothingess has never existed, there has always been something.
For those having trouble understanding this, don't worry. This is a bunch of nonsense. Don't believe me? I believe "space-time-quantum-foam-sort-of-something" is about as lazy of an explanation as it gets. I've seen better science in Star Trek.
he explained quantum foam in such a manner as to relay the trouble of wrapping our minds around it, not to try and make it sound outlandish.. if u understood quantum wave functions, and the uncertain nature of quantum mechanics, u would understand how a"quantum foam" may exist..the trouble lies in wrapping our minds around it..just because u can't understand something doesn't make it nonsense..it usually just means you're too stupid and/or ignorant..
"well if it came from something that already existed it sure as hell came from something and not" not nothing. i left out the nothing, that might be confusing.
0:29 to 0:38 well if it came from something that already existed it sure as hell came from something and not. dumbass. the problem with all the shit that atheists try and use against intelligent design is that they take things that are possible, but unproven and try to use that as evidence. use facts, not possibilities. "lets assert" no, lets assumptions can't hold up in an argument. lets stick with facts which atheists ironically seem to lack.
I tried to watch this video few times and each time I hear you saying: Lets assert that some kind of space time quantum foam sort of something existed before our universe I start laughing and stop watching, I apologize but this is as far as I can get.
he explained quantum foam in such a manner as to relay the trouble of wrapping our minds around it, not to try and make it sound outlandish.. if u understood quantum wave functions, and the uncertain nature of quantum mechanics, u would understand how a"quantum foam" may exist..the trouble lies in wrapping our mind around it. remember..we know quantum reality exists. we don't know that Yahweh, Zeus and other gods and goddesses exist..and don't apologize. i can't make it thru Genesis.
@helasmoh You and me both, I find the Big Bang and the Evolution theory full of assumptions, really unintelligent ones to be honest. ''Something came from nothing'', I laughed hard.
I hope you watched my video Quran Vs Lawrence Krauss, as for evolution then please watch my video: Evolution was an Islamic Theory Before Darwin was Even Born: /watch?v=Ugu3cZN-3jU
Atheists now are runing for science of the Gaps, I already proved beyond any doubt that this universe had a Designer, an incredibly ingenious Designer, in my video: Richard Dawkins and the fine tuning with Steven Weinberg: /watch?v=oO0QRUX4HGE
I hope you can watch the videos and comment on them.
@helasmoh Actually, I'm a Messianic believer. I don't intend on killing my fellow man around me, nor will I ever want to. I want to send out a message of peace, not saying ''Join my religion, or I'll kill you for being an unbeliever.'' And if they want to leave my religion, they're free to do so. Unlike islam, which kills anyone that abandons the faith. Even moms and dads kill their own children for leaving.
@helasmoh I think you were understanding me wrong.
A Messianic believer is a Jew (being a descendent from an Israëlian born Hebrew) that is convinced that Yeshua Ha'Mashiach (Jesus Christ) is the Messiah, that He is the Son of YHWH.
I'm not a Muslim.
I don't blame ''Allah'' or my God, YHWH, for the stupidity of Muslims, I blame Muslims for the stupidity of Muslims. That they believe in the words that a pedophilic illerate man wrote that hates non-believers.
@csmcmillion You do know belief is based on faith, and faith isn't based on evidence, right?
You can assert whatever you want, but that's not the theory scientists have assumed to be true, meaning the Evolution theory (which is also connected to the Big Bang theory, because the Big Bang represents Cosmic Evolution).
The modern evolutionary synthesis has nothing to do with the Big Bang. Evolution could be just fine with a steady state theory of the universe, and the Big Bang Theory stands on its own without evolutionary theory. They are different aspects of science. You may say that the Big Bang theory does represents "Cosmic Evolution" but that is just semantics. The evolutionary *theory* deals only with diversity of life.
@gininginin If the theory of Evolution has no evolutionary beginning, the entire theory of Evolution would be considered useless. The Big Bang is the only creation story that fits and thus is part of the theory of Evolution.
>>The Big Bang is the only creation story that fits and thus is part of the theory of Evolution
The theory of evolution does not attempt to be a 'creation story', it only explains the diversity of life once life already began. For all that concerns evolution, a fairy could have created the first replicating cell, and the complete modern evolutionary synthesis would still be valid. If you read about evolution at wikipedia orBerkley you would know this. Also try v=t3k0dDFxkhM
@gininginin The ''Evolution theory'' you're talking about, is Macro Evolution, Micro Evolution and Natural Selection. That's only a tiny part of the actual theory, you haven't done your homework.
''For all that evolution concerns, a fairy could have created the first replicating cell...''
So, you do believe a fairy could have made it, but not a supernatural entity otherwise known as God?
>>The ''Evolution theory'' you're talking about, is Macro Evolution, Micro Evolution and Natural Selection.
It's called modern evolutionary synthesis. Now, where are YOU doing your homework? AIG? Go read about evolution at a proper site first before answering, please. Go to Berkley Evolution 101 or something. Else this is a waste of time.
>>So, you do believe a fairy could have made it, but not a supernatural entity otherwise known as God?
@TheLightedDarkness Kent Hovnid has never debunked anything. Our side has facts, research, and testable hypotheses. You guys have stories. Unconfirmed, non-testable, outragious stories. But you claim to know that they are true (your stories). We are happy to say 'I don't Know' but we can also test our hypothesis to see if they are true or false. You guys are just guessing.
@TheLightedDarkness Hovind isn't a Doctor. He bought a diploma from a diploma mill. He keeps saying "I love science." , but he's clueless about sciemce. He's not religious, he's a scam artist who cons religious people into buying his ridiculous courses and donating money.
He's in prison right now for screwing the taxpayers, including you, by trying to weasel out of paying taxes. He won't get out until 2015.
Don't be conned by a con man with a mail order degree. He screws dimwits.
@TheLightedDarkness Hovind says he taught High School Science, but won't say where. His "Doctorate" was issued by an address that, when viewed with Google Earth, is a small, trashy trailer house.
He's a fraud, a liar, and a convicted felon. He's the laughingstock of real scientists.
God/allah/jewish God has made the universe in just 6 days!
how can people say that the universe is made out of nothing?
well...if the universe is made out of nothing then what was "nothing" made of?
all the people who believe in God his don't let people or scientist or teachers fool you! you may learn this on school to get a good grade but keep your faith in God people!
What was before god then? You have zero evidence/proofs of the existence of such a being, and by all definition of a god that is not worthless is a logical impossibility! But, hey, keep wasting your time and pray for nothing!
Oh, and, the computer you are using now, yeah, that one to post on youtube, was made through science (knowledge), not faith; faith in the sense you use it is worthless.
no1 knows no1 will know, we only use 15% of our brain we cant find out, millions of years ago "god" created a molecule that molecule after millions of years changed and become more and more each molecule became it's own thing some turned into animals,insects, animals that use their claws for protection,animals that use their skin for protection, animals that use their nose or ears or tail or feet for protection and then there is us , animals that use there brain for protection.
A corn of something in nothing is an absurdity. Anything I can think of must exist in a space, and a space must have at least some kind of color and temperature. Nonexistence can be imagined only as a space that has color and temperature, and if nonexistence is a space that has color and temperature, then it is not nothing but it is something. Actually, God exists because on one hand nonexistence is impossible and on the other hand something not omnipotent does not have power to exist by itself.
@Kaarox Carbon dating so far seems to prove that everything had a beginning somewhere. The only things you have to believe is that space always had fluctuating fields, like a property of nothingness; that it has fluctuating fields nowadays is proven. Then that fluctuating fields can create energy, which is also proven they can. The final thing (which is the biggest hurdle) is that energy can clump together to create bigger mass. This vid isn't complete though, look around if you're interested.
we could still ask where did that single gram that was finely-tuned to create life come from, and what forces of physics were exerted upon that tiny piece of gram? It does through the question a step back though, definitely..
@Shadi1007 "It is not created out of nothing, ... Quantum fluctuations are not atoms popping out of nothing."
How do you know?
Are you a mathematics master on the same level as a master theoretical physicist?
I don't know the details of the beginning... ... and neither do you.
Don't let your indoctrination into one of many different dogmatic ideologies cloud your acceptance of real evidence, or such accepted claims by professionals in their fields.
uhh. the heisenberg uncertainty principle states that we cannot know both the velocity and location of an electron at any given time. how the FUCK does that allow for something coming from nothing? the whole video is based on the assertion that the spacetime continuum existed beforehand, anyway. why does the uncertainty principle allow us to just presume some random particle can be created out of nothing? someone please explain.
@ilyLaura1 "... why does the uncertainty principle allow us to just presume some random particle can be created out of nothing? someone please explain."
While I can't explain quantum mechanics, because I don't know enough maths. I have recently read news where particle physicists have discovered that the energy concentration in a proton, which gives it 90% of it mass, is found in the empty space between the 3 quarks that make up the particle, and presumably the neutron.
from In Search of Schrodinger's Cat by John Gribbin, pg. 196: "The uncertainty principle applies to the complementary properties of TIME and ENERGY, as well as to position/momentum...An electron does not exist in isolation, because it can borrow energy from the uncertainty relation, for a short enough period of time (less than 10 to the -15 seconds), and use it to create a photon...It is as if each electron is surrounded by a cloud of "virtual" photons, which.....
....which only need a little push, a little energy from outside, to escape and become real. An electron moving from an excited state to a lower state in an atom gives the excess energy to one of its virtual photons and lets it fly free..." Thus, most of the virtual photons that are literally coming from nothing are allowed to come into existence and exist for a VERY short time before disappearing because of the Uncertainty Principle's uncertainty about time/energy(mass)....
So when you are staring into the glowing coals of a campfire, with all those red-colored photons entering your eye, each one of them has popped into existence out of thin air near (associated with) an electron in an atom in one of the coals, been given a quantum of energy from the atom in the heat of the fire going to a lower energy state, and is thereby allowed to no longer be merely "virtual" but to be persistent and have plenty of time to fly across over to your eye.
Which doesn't mean that the virtual particles aren't real. They're real, and appearing out of thin air. But they're living on borrowed time, literally, and the Uncertainty Principle requires them, all things being equal, to vanish again almost immediately. But during that time period "the universe" is permitted to be uncertain whether there is a small amount of matter there (that wasn't there a moment before) or not, i.e. a particle can appear "out of thin air"....
The other place where stuff appears out of nowhere due to the Uncertainty Principle is near the event horizon of a black hole. Pairs of particles appear out of nowhere right at the event horizon and sometimes the two particles never get a chance to recombine and vanish because one of them falls into the hole and the other gets to go on living by escaping the hole. This is the phenomenon that brings about black hole evaporation.
@leisulin The universe was birthed when gaseous pressure became much more than atmospheric pressure, from a static boundless three dimensional vacuum space of gravity and energy.
The universe was NOT created out of nothing. Watch my video response to this video: Quran Vs. Lawrence Krauss and "A Universe From Nothing" : /watch?v=cv7lCR-7AKQ
@Shadi1007 God is the fairy tale! And yes I agree M-theory need to be put under experimental tests in order for it to become a scientific theory! However there are ways of finding these hidden dimensions suggested by M-theory. One is by observing the lost energy after particle collisions in the LHC and the others are performing experiments based on the theory of Quantum Entanglements. The latter is the most feasible due to our current technology. And Quantum Mechanics is not a theory anymore!
@FallofDarkness55 "... And Quantum Mechanics is not a theory anymore!"
While I agree with your comment, a 'Theory' is never promoted to 'Fact'. Such would be a demotion, because a scientific theory is the Explanation that takes Facts with which Predictions are made.
The fact of evolution is explained by the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection. The fact of gravity is explained by the Newtonian Theory and in breaking news, the Theory of General Relativity. (See Gravity Probe B.)
@psycotria Yes. I know all about that. I printed out Nasa's article on the Gravity Probe B and the recent findings that confirmed Einstein's theory of general relativity! The same logic applies to quantum mechanics via quantum experiments that have confirmed the theories of QM! I realize they are not considered to be facts but in my world they are after many confirmations of a theory! Not to mention the fact that I have witnessed these properties ( i.e. diffraction etc.) in my physics 3 lab!
@Shadi1007 Wrong! The answers that the theoretical physicists are getting are finite! It is not infinity! At least their theory has been proved with mathematics whereas god has not been proven whatsoever! God is the bullshit answer! In fact quantum mechanics and god are contradictory if you think about it logically! An intelligent designer follows a sequential set of steps, so to speak, whereas quantum mechanics is very unpredictable, thus QM eliminates god's existence. M-theory is the way to go
@Shadi1007 Quantum fluctuations are essentially energy at the heart of all matter and therefore there are things constantly popping into existence every fraction of a second. This all makes sense when you invoke the powerful unified theory...M-theory!
Ok lemme start off by saying im not a creationist. But this nonsense contradicts itself several times that i cant sit threw and watch its retardation all the way threw.
When it all boils down to it no matter how you try to discredit GOD; it had to be a supreme being that created all of this knowledge that we see. It's to fascinating, it's to perfect, it had a design and he made us to figure him out with knowledge and debating. He knew unbeliever would be there too. What can you say God got you figure out, because he'll infinite in knowledge. Amen
@stevejon71 "... it had to be a supreme being that created all of this knowledge that we see. It's to fascinating, it's to perfect ..."
Appeal to Incredulity = FAIL
"... it had a design and he made us to figure him out with knowledge and debating. He knew unbeliever would be there too. ... because he'll infinite in knowledge ..."
One baseless Assertion after another. BELIEVE whatever you like, but you can't KNOW what you claim. It just 'sounds good' to you.
I have a solution to what created Space quantum something...Example: imagine that your living room is empty, you couldn't see anything right? no color to interfere, because when you have nothing there is NO color...There is Nothing, that was before anything nothing...NOTHING!!
@DishrackDarwin haha looks whos talking haha you say i got bad english look at you " ur a pussy" haha think before u type haha they thought you that in second grade hahah XD!!!!!!!!!
@MrMegatruth hmmm lets start with your mom bitch man bitch please ive seen u argue with other people in other videos and judging on your stupid comments your not worth my time hoe
@MrMegatruth HAHA XD your making my day by making me laugh megadouche dude your so ignorant and stupid if that even i told you you wouldnt believe me hahahahahha!!!! XD besides why im i going to lie i dont got evidence but someone out there does i dont know who so sont ask faggot!!!!!
its kinda weird and silly that something was created out of nothing but as physicist michio kaku said something wonderful that "its only the question of how we define nothingness"
@helasmoh Why bother watching your lies about the Quran?
Isn't it funny that the only things "revealed" by the Quran are only known about after science has discovered them? If all of this knowledge was in it, why aren't most (hell...even some) scientific advancements coming from devout Muslims?
Everything in my video was stated clearly in the Quran long before our scientists proved it. If you want indisputable proof that the Quran was way ahead of our scientists then watch my other video "Richard Dawkins Exposed - Evolution Proves God". /watch?v=Ugu3cZN-3jU
Do you what was evolution name before it became Darwin's?
@helasmoh All Religious Books Are Full Of Lies and Stupidity. They're all Faerie tell Stories like Santa Clauss Storie. They never explaint nothing but Crap.........
@helasmoh All Religious Books Are Full Of Lies and Stupidity. They're all Faerie tell Stories like Santa Clauss Storie. They never explain nothing but Crap.........
@helasmoh All Religious Books Are Full Of Lies and Stupidity. They're all Faerie tell Stories like Santa Clauss Storie. They never explain nothing but Crap.........
@theamericandream1989
Yes, all of science is "to the best of our knowledge". So what? The typical point being made by a theist who says that is to accuse science of not really knowing for sure about everything, followed immediately by the non sequitur of "then god must have done it". Science is the best tool we have for understanding the universe. It is self-correcting over time as more progess is made. Throwing up our hands and saying "god did it" is just a lazy copout.
leisulin 2 weeks ago
The problem with this theory of the origin of the universe is that it relies on quantum mechanics, not because quantum mechanics is a shaky theory, but because it has so many facets which defy common sense here in the macro-world. If the typical theist can, with a straight face, announce that evolution/natural selection is crap, in the face of all the tangible evidence for it, how much more impossible it would be to convince a theist that the universe could be no more than a quantum fluctuation!
leisulin 2 weeks ago
I stopped watching @0:27
The music sounds IDENTICAL to LOOK AT ME NOW by BUSTA RYMES + CHRIS BROWN
itsanepicname 1 month ago
watch Lawrence Krauss's lecture on this subject to get a better understanding of these ideas.
mahmoudyzadeh 1 month ago
I think people are getting bogged down in the semantics. No one is suggesting that literally nothing exists outside the universe and that everything came from that. Something from nothing is more to do with how the univesre was created from zero input as the universe is supposedly 'flat' and therefore it's positive and negative energies are balanced. I'm not religious but if a being willed our universe into existence it would seem that this was the mechanism that it used.
mahmoudyzadeh 1 month ago
It's hard to imagine Something created from Nothing. But what created God? Maybe God is the same IDEA of Something created from Nothing. But I just don't think there is a God for very many reasons.
LeavingWanted 1 month ago
sorry... i'm not buyin you could grow nothing into everything...
-trurhordeath
helpingthestupids 1 month ago
@helpingthestupids
learn something about quantum mechanics.....something is created out of nothing all the time, all around us and within us...almost all of the time the somethings recombine and disappear again, going back to being "nothing" after a very short span of time, so short it probably makes a nanosecond look like a long time.....this is part of the core workings of the subatomic world....something ELSE you can mindlessly poopoo for being "only" a "theory"....
leisulin 2 weeks ago
trippy
NewZealaand 1 month ago
theres nothing created out of nothing
DropsOfRain1 1 month ago
these videos scare me for some reason...
EpicPrimeTime 2 months ago
"Let's assert that some kind of space-time quantum foam sort of something existed before our own universe began." Sorry, but that is b.s. because you are positing that something ALREADY existed; it's not "nothing." This is a very lame way to begin this assertion and this is why creationists can always throw it back into an atheists face about the creation of the universe - simply, because we can't account for "something" out of "nothing."
diegodann 2 months ago
@diegodann The way I understand it, we can and do label it as such, because whatever was there "before" our universe came into existence, it necessarily was not part of our universe. We define our universe as the sum of everything that exists. Nothing exists outside of it -> the universe, indeed, came from nothing.
It might be appropriate to encompass the unknown "before" the BB into our definition of the universe, though, and suddenly, it ceases to be a problem.
~Sylv
Sylvine 1 month ago
If you start with nothing there are no quantum fluctuations. Maybe you mean that you start with space-time absent mass and energy.
StormTrek 2 months ago
yeah i think god is bullshit but so is this
for20days 2 months ago
@for20days
That very small amounts of matter can (and do) pop into existence "out of nothing" and exist in the universe VERY VERY briefly is one of the core ideas in quantum mechanics, the "new" theory in physics that sprang up in the 1920s-30s. Like other "theories", it has withstood the test of time. Much of the technology of the present day relies on quantum mechanics, including the computer I'm typing this into, lasers, all kinds of stuff. It's very real......
leisulin 2 weeks ago
@for20days
.....the idea in the video is merely an extension of this idea, and is fully compatible with quantum mechanics. It is quite possible the entire universe is merely a quantum fluctuation that appeared "out of nothing" and will, eventually, vanish just as abruptly. Some of the discoveries of quantum mechanics seem very bizarre, yet they, like those of relativity, have withstood scientific scrutiny and experimental verification.
leisulin 2 weeks ago
beautiful explanation, thank god science works
JKTProductionzIncNCo 3 months ago
The laws of physics break down when thinking about before the big bang. If scientists try to pretend they know what happened, they're no better than religious people.
SuzLa1 3 months ago 5
@SuzLa1 Umm, no scientist has said they know what happened before the Big Bang, they just say that in QM something can come from nothing...
IcarusTouma 2 months ago
@SuzLa1 Actually they're a lot better than religious people, for they admit that they don't know in the absence of evidence. And they continue to work on finding out the answer. Religious people make the claim that their holy books already provide the answer and dismiss all evidence that contradict their faith. For religion, the lesser the evidence, the more they believe it.
petion2010 2 months ago 5
@petion2010
You are wrong. Though the video is tilted with a question mark, the video undoubtly speaks it as fact on how something came from nothing giving the thought they are right and know what happend.
xzaozinx 2 months ago
@xzaozinx No they didn't.
petion2010 2 months ago
@xzaozinx
They offer a possible explanation for how the universe came into existence that is completely compatible with a well-understood branch of physics known as quantum mechanics. The exact same sort of occurrence is known to happen at extremely small scales and is predicted to also possibly happen at larger scales, but more rarely, obviously, becoming rarer and rarer at larger and larger physical scales.
leisulin 2 weeks ago
@SuzLa1
Which is why they don't "pretend", they hypothesize and then test their hypotheses to see if they pan out. It's not scientists who (without any reason or evidence to think so) make up mythical sky daddies who did everything, it's imaginationless theists who do that. The LATTER are the ones who are good at "pretending".
leisulin 2 weeks ago
@SuzLa1 The whole video comes from a faulty assumption. "Let's assert that some kind of space-time quantum foam sort of something existed before our universe began." Other than this being very scientific, it still does not account for the origin of the space-time quantum foam sort of something. Did it create itself?
fincher007 1 week ago
@fincher007
God forbid we consider the possibility that someone actually created it ☺.
2BunnyReturns 1 day ago
------------------------and that someone is God
fincher007 1 day ago
Comment removed
Rookerfy 1 week ago
@satyestru it does not explain why it bang. It just says that something "negligibly small" (that amount of matter in that small space) can create the universe IF it bangs. As far as I know, there is a lot of evidence about the inflation theory, but its cause its still unknown. The point is that
thebiggestgenius 3 months ago
I don't get it. Why did it bang?
satyestru 3 months ago
furthermore just because particals disapear and appear does not mean its not the same partical thats entangled but simply passing on and out of dimensional space
Lok783 3 months ago
ok qauntum physics states all matter including consciousness is entangled so that would qaulify the universe a life form a living being
Lok783 3 months ago
The universe didn't come from nothing, because if there is truely nothing, then nothing can only cause nothing to happen. Also, this video has a misleading title, it says the universe came from nothing, yet you tell us to imagine something before the big bang, idiot
Zekezan88 4 months ago
Comment removed
Zekezan88 4 months ago
@Shadi1007
I'm saying that words like "immaterial" should not be used in this context. Matter/energy is all that exists and has always existed. The current shape/form of the universe is only one version of many possibilities. I hope this helps to clarify my point. :)
ptij0404 4 months ago
@ptij0404 This guy is right, energy and matter cannot be destroyed, or created, but only transformed into different forms, COME ON PEOPLE 4th GRADE SCIENCE
Zekezan88 4 months ago
@Shadi1007
"You honestly think that something can pop out of nothing? That something for no reason at all can just be?"
Maybe it's time we start rephrasing that concept. Maybe the word "nothing" shouldn't exist at all.
It's seems there has always been "something" in existence but we just didn't know what to call it. :)
ptij0404 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Listen up all you religious faithheads and spiritualists: The idea of a "god" is not an answer. It only makes things more complicated because then you have to explain what/who/where/when that "god" is. Just grow up and let it go! Science is the ONLY game that matters.
ptij0404 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
View my video, debates are welcome --- If the universe is expanding then what is it expanding into, through or towards?????? If the universe is expanding then LOGIC will tell you there is a border between the universes edge and the edge of NOTHINGNESS. If nothingness exists, then there has always been something existing. Something cannot come from nothingness. I have my video explaining this.
webartist31 4 months ago
@AtheosRecords Ah well, judge by the induviual ;)
Avataryoutuification 4 months ago
Not a bad video for those who understand modern cosmology I think. For those who don't (apparently, from the other comments) it just sounds like a big story. There is evidence for the universe beginning as a quantum fluctuation. Why don't you cover that? It's not THAT hard to simplify it for the sort of viewer who knows nothing about cosmology (and who has an iron in the fire theologically).
PlasteredDragon 5 months ago
@AtheosRecords true although in saying that they just disprove their god as nothing can be created by nothing so there was nothing to create or use even if they insert a magic spirit in there. They also forget to mention both space and time expanded and are the same thing space/time, no expansion no space no time. But there was an infinite dense speck of matter so nothing came from nothing is the wrong argument. If they say where did this speck come from, well where did their god come from?
MsOneiroi77 5 months ago
@Shadi1007 lol. very true.
josephpatrickknox 5 months ago
@Shadi1007 If something created the Universe, then we could follow that train of thought to ask: "What created that something"? If there was a first cause, then what caused the first cause? What caused that cause ad infinitum. It's an infinite regress and it's nauseating.
josephpatrickknox 5 months ago
@josephpatrickknox That's exactly what Richard Dawkins implies when he asks ''Who created God?''.
TheLightedDarkness 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Religions Aside....
ABIOGENISIS = all life came from Rocks......it is the Foundation of "Evolution"....so.... if you believe this....your pet rock or space rocks will come to life and spawn millions of species.....Think...."Magic God Rocks"???...
Do The Math...Unlike People It Does Not Lie....
50,000,000,000,000 cells in a human.....3,500,000,000 years for "Magic Rock" to evolve to a human......."Magic Rockers"....It Is Time For A New Theory....
Math Has Imploded The Old One....
songforamericans 5 months ago
Bad video with equally bad music.
Postulating that a spec of matter x number of years ago eventually turned into our present day universe is no more outlandish than simply saying God created it.
eetmieshyt 6 months ago
@eetmieshyt
Yep with the tiny difference that here he is postulating something to fit the facts not the other way around ;)
mugogrog 6 months ago
rotflmao
So this is supposed to be the origins explanation - ex nihilo?!
Insanity has taken hold of these patented idiots.
Quantum fluctuation explanations are no explanations at all. All real scientists know this well.
HINT: Nothing means there is nothing to fluctuate - no energy existed before the universe existed, no laws existed um cause there was nothing you nitwits!!
lordsong7 6 months ago
Really; something from nothing? All you need is quantum foam or a god that always existed. Sorry but bull crap is bull crap; I don't care how pretty you make the package looks! :-)
MsWanderer1 6 months ago
See DARK MATER AND THE EXPANSION OF OUR UNIVERSE and CERN AND BLACK HOLES. @ gaynorglowellxsingh’s channel.
glowellxinfinity 6 months ago
You CANNOT pull something out of nothingness. The universe has always existed (not including the quantum foam stuff in this vid), and has never had a starting point of its creation. If the universe is expanding, then what is it expanding into??!!! There is no border between the universe and nothingness (which is on the other side of the border). Nothingess has never existed, there has always been something.
webartist31 7 months ago
bullshit this all depends on that spec just being there.
Where the hell did the spec come from?
limitedplay 7 months ago
For those having trouble understanding this, don't worry. This is a bunch of nonsense. Don't believe me? I believe "space-time-quantum-foam-sort-of-something" is about as lazy of an explanation as it gets. I've seen better science in Star Trek.
Patience1138 7 months ago
@Patience1138
he explained quantum foam in such a manner as to relay the trouble of wrapping our minds around it, not to try and make it sound outlandish.. if u understood quantum wave functions, and the uncertain nature of quantum mechanics, u would understand how a"quantum foam" may exist..the trouble lies in wrapping our minds around it..just because u can't understand something doesn't make it nonsense..it usually just means you're too stupid and/or ignorant..
itzahazylife 6 months ago
@itzahazylife Still, it's an odd thing to use as a first assumption...
Patience1138 6 months ago
@Patience1138
not when u understand how odd quantum mechanics is.
itzahazylife 6 months ago
"well if it came from something that already existed it sure as hell came from something and not" not nothing. i left out the nothing, that might be confusing.
FeedMeForiAmATroll 7 months ago
0:29 to 0:38 well if it came from something that already existed it sure as hell came from something and not. dumbass. the problem with all the shit that atheists try and use against intelligent design is that they take things that are possible, but unproven and try to use that as evidence. use facts, not possibilities. "lets assert" no, lets assumptions can't hold up in an argument. lets stick with facts which atheists ironically seem to lack.
FeedMeForiAmATroll 7 months ago
how can something come out of nothing......
clivehope1966 8 months ago
and they witnessed this when?
FarmboyRecords 8 months ago
I tried to watch this video few times and each time I hear you saying: Lets assert that some kind of space time quantum foam sort of something existed before our universe I start laughing and stop watching, I apologize but this is as far as I can get.
helasmoh 8 months ago 2
@helasmoh
he explained quantum foam in such a manner as to relay the trouble of wrapping our minds around it, not to try and make it sound outlandish.. if u understood quantum wave functions, and the uncertain nature of quantum mechanics, u would understand how a"quantum foam" may exist..the trouble lies in wrapping our mind around it. remember..we know quantum reality exists. we don't know that Yahweh, Zeus and other gods and goddesses exist..and don't apologize. i can't make it thru Genesis.
itzahazylife 6 months ago
@itzahazylife
This whole universe will be wrapped up again, never mind our minds :)
Please watch my video: Quran Vs. Lawrence Krauss and "A Universe From Nothing": /watch?v=cv7lCR-7AKQ
I'm not sure if Zeus send us a message, if he did, please forward it to me.
helasmoh 6 months ago
@helasmoh You and me both, I find the Big Bang and the Evolution theory full of assumptions, really unintelligent ones to be honest. ''Something came from nothing'', I laughed hard.
TheLightedDarkness 5 months ago
@TheLightedDarkness
I hope you watched my video Quran Vs Lawrence Krauss, as for evolution then please watch my video: Evolution was an Islamic Theory Before Darwin was Even Born: /watch?v=Ugu3cZN-3jU
Atheists now are runing for science of the Gaps, I already proved beyond any doubt that this universe had a Designer, an incredibly ingenious Designer, in my video: Richard Dawkins and the fine tuning with Steven Weinberg: /watch?v=oO0QRUX4HGE
I hope you can watch the videos and comment on them.
helasmoh 5 months ago
@helasmoh Actually, I'm a Messianic believer. I don't intend on killing my fellow man around me, nor will I ever want to. I want to send out a message of peace, not saying ''Join my religion, or I'll kill you for being an unbeliever.'' And if they want to leave my religion, they're free to do so. Unlike islam, which kills anyone that abandons the faith. Even moms and dads kill their own children for leaving.
TheLightedDarkness 5 months ago
@TheLightedDarkness
So you blame God for the stupidity of some Muslims, Please watch my video about this: Richard Dawkins on Islam Debunked: /watch?v=1Jo_CS7mzRc
As for being Messianic then I'm a Messianic like you too, if not more, way way more, please watch my video: Trinity Debunked: /watch?v=kstticNSO2g
helasmoh 5 months ago
@helasmoh I think you were understanding me wrong.
A Messianic believer is a Jew (being a descendent from an Israëlian born Hebrew) that is convinced that Yeshua Ha'Mashiach (Jesus Christ) is the Messiah, that He is the Son of YHWH.
I'm not a Muslim.
I don't blame ''Allah'' or my God, YHWH, for the stupidity of Muslims, I blame Muslims for the stupidity of Muslims. That they believe in the words that a pedophilic illerate man wrote that hates non-believers.
And I'll watch the videos
TheLightedDarkness 5 months ago
@TheLightedDarkness ''Something came from nothing'', I laughed hard.
And you have evidence that it can't? Obviously, creationists believe it can, b/c that's the only way their god can exist.
csmcmillion 5 months ago
@csmcmillion Actually, we believe G'd always existed, since there was no time during His existence (before even time was made, I mean).
TheLightedDarkness 5 months ago
@TheLightedDarkness and your evidence for this belief is... ?
I can assert with equal validity that the seed of whatever the universe came from always existed...
csmcmillion 5 months ago
@csmcmillion You do know belief is based on faith, and faith isn't based on evidence, right?
You can assert whatever you want, but that's not the theory scientists have assumed to be true, meaning the Evolution theory (which is also connected to the Big Bang theory, because the Big Bang represents Cosmic Evolution).
TheLightedDarkness 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheLightedDarkness > You do know belief is based on faith, and faith isn't based on evidence, right?
Absolutely. That;s why faith is irrational.
> but that's not the theory scientists have assumed to be true
As a physicist, I can assure you that no scientist (at least no competent one) assumes ANY theory to be true.
The Theory of Evolution is a theory of biology. We make no such connection in cosmology.
csmcmillion 5 months ago
@TheLightedDarkness "You do know belief is based on faith, and faith isn't based on evidence, right?"
Wrong. Faith and evidence are individually means to the end of belief. A belief based on evidence is more rational than a belief based on faith.
"meaning the Evolution theory (which is also connected to the Big Bang theory"
Completely incorrect. The theory of evolution and the Big Bang theory have nothing to do with each other whatsoever.
TrevorBlack79 5 months ago
@TrevorBlack79 Faith is not based on evidence.
The Big Bang theory is part of the Evolution theory. It's a fact, not oppinion.
TheLightedDarkness 5 months ago
@TheLightedDarkness
The modern evolutionary synthesis has nothing to do with the Big Bang. Evolution could be just fine with a steady state theory of the universe, and the Big Bang Theory stands on its own without evolutionary theory. They are different aspects of science. You may say that the Big Bang theory does represents "Cosmic Evolution" but that is just semantics. The evolutionary *theory* deals only with diversity of life.
gininginin 5 months ago
@gininginin If the theory of Evolution has no evolutionary beginning, the entire theory of Evolution would be considered useless. The Big Bang is the only creation story that fits and thus is part of the theory of Evolution.
TheLightedDarkness 5 months ago
@TheLightedDarkness
>>The Big Bang is the only creation story that fits and thus is part of the theory of Evolution
The theory of evolution does not attempt to be a 'creation story', it only explains the diversity of life once life already began. For all that concerns evolution, a fairy could have created the first replicating cell, and the complete modern evolutionary synthesis would still be valid. If you read about evolution at wikipedia orBerkley you would know this. Also try v=t3k0dDFxkhM
gininginin 5 months ago
@gininginin The ''Evolution theory'' you're talking about, is Macro Evolution, Micro Evolution and Natural Selection. That's only a tiny part of the actual theory, you haven't done your homework.
''For all that evolution concerns, a fairy could have created the first replicating cell...''
So, you do believe a fairy could have made it, but not a supernatural entity otherwise known as God?
TheLightedDarkness 5 months ago
@TheLightedDarkness
>>The ''Evolution theory'' you're talking about, is Macro Evolution, Micro Evolution and Natural Selection.
It's called modern evolutionary synthesis. Now, where are YOU doing your homework? AIG? Go read about evolution at a proper site first before answering, please. Go to Berkley Evolution 101 or something. Else this is a waste of time.
>>So, you do believe a fairy could have made it, but not a supernatural entity otherwise known as God?
Read my posts, you are trolling.
gininginin 5 months ago
@gininginin I've seen the entire Berkley University being debunked in their concept of Evolution theory by Kent Hovind, so no thanks.
Also, I'm not trolling. If you don't know the answer, don't be an ego and just say so.
TheLightedDarkness 5 months ago
@TheLightedDarkness Kent Hovnid has never debunked anything. Our side has facts, research, and testable hypotheses. You guys have stories. Unconfirmed, non-testable, outragious stories. But you claim to know that they are true (your stories). We are happy to say 'I don't Know' but we can also test our hypothesis to see if they are true or false. You guys are just guessing.
henchmen999 4 months ago
@TheLightedDarkness Hovind isn't a Doctor. He bought a diploma from a diploma mill. He keeps saying "I love science." , but he's clueless about sciemce. He's not religious, he's a scam artist who cons religious people into buying his ridiculous courses and donating money.
He's in prison right now for screwing the taxpayers, including you, by trying to weasel out of paying taxes. He won't get out until 2015.
Don't be conned by a con man with a mail order degree. He screws dimwits.
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago
@ndrthrdr1 Uhm, he gave science classes for over 20 years.
He did not buy his doctors degree, unless you mean paying for his education, where after he went to teach science.
How am I a victim of someone else not paying their taxes, mind you that I'm not even American (I love how every evolutionist assumes that).
He doesn't screw dimwits, he hasn't been at your place.
TheLightedDarkness 4 months ago
@TheLightedDarkness Hovind says he taught High School Science, but won't say where. His "Doctorate" was issued by an address that, when viewed with Google Earth, is a small, trashy trailer house.
He's a fraud, a liar, and a convicted felon. He's the laughingstock of real scientists.
ndrthrdr1 4 months ago
the voice is incredibly annoying -.-
Augustburnsweed 8 months ago
God/allah/jewish God has made the universe in just 6 days!
how can people say that the universe is made out of nothing?
well...if the universe is made out of nothing then what was "nothing" made of?
all the people who believe in God his don't let people or scientist or teachers fool you! you may learn this on school to get a good grade but keep your faith in God people!
Ilovethemunksnettes 8 months ago
@Ilovethemunksnettes
What was before god then? You have zero evidence/proofs of the existence of such a being, and by all definition of a god that is not worthless is a logical impossibility! But, hey, keep wasting your time and pray for nothing!
Oh, and, the computer you are using now, yeah, that one to post on youtube, was made through science (knowledge), not faith; faith in the sense you use it is worthless.
is1337Correct 8 months ago
no1 knows no1 will know, we only use 15% of our brain we cant find out, millions of years ago "god" created a molecule that molecule after millions of years changed and become more and more each molecule became it's own thing some turned into animals,insects, animals that use their claws for protection,animals that use their skin for protection, animals that use their nose or ears or tail or feet for protection and then there is us , animals that use there brain for protection.
iHeartHouseMusiK 8 months ago
i don't get it
1Datey 8 months ago
A corn of something in nothing is an absurdity. Anything I can think of must exist in a space, and a space must have at least some kind of color and temperature. Nonexistence can be imagined only as a space that has color and temperature, and if nonexistence is a space that has color and temperature, then it is not nothing but it is something. Actually, God exists because on one hand nonexistence is impossible and on the other hand something not omnipotent does not have power to exist by itself.
mikilavush 8 months ago
I Don't give a fuck wtf, energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be modified and transferred.
This explanation is about the same as 'A wizard did it' or 'God did it'
Just because everything we see seems to need to be created doesn't mean the universe was.
The universe is organic never had a beginning nor an end.
Kaarox 8 months ago
@Kaarox Carbon dating so far seems to prove that everything had a beginning somewhere. The only things you have to believe is that space always had fluctuating fields, like a property of nothingness; that it has fluctuating fields nowadays is proven. Then that fluctuating fields can create energy, which is also proven they can. The final thing (which is the biggest hurdle) is that energy can clump together to create bigger mass. This vid isn't complete though, look around if you're interested.
666Seryan 8 months ago
we could still ask where did that single gram that was finely-tuned to create life come from, and what forces of physics were exerted upon that tiny piece of gram? It does through the question a step back though, definitely..
Drooblemeister 9 months ago
@Drooblemeister A wizard did it obviously.
Kaarox 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How? God said "Let there be..." and there was.
mrtadreamer 9 months ago
@Shadi1007 "It is not created out of nothing, ... Quantum fluctuations are not atoms popping out of nothing."
How do you know?
Are you a mathematics master on the same level as a master theoretical physicist?
I don't know the details of the beginning... ... and neither do you.
Don't let your indoctrination into one of many different dogmatic ideologies cloud your acceptance of real evidence, or such accepted claims by professionals in their fields.
psycotria 9 months ago
uhh. the heisenberg uncertainty principle states that we cannot know both the velocity and location of an electron at any given time. how the FUCK does that allow for something coming from nothing? the whole video is based on the assertion that the spacetime continuum existed beforehand, anyway. why does the uncertainty principle allow us to just presume some random particle can be created out of nothing? someone please explain.
ilyLaura1 9 months ago
@ilyLaura1 "... why does the uncertainty principle allow us to just presume some random particle can be created out of nothing? someone please explain."
While I can't explain quantum mechanics, because I don't know enough maths. I have recently read news where particle physicists have discovered that the energy concentration in a proton, which gives it 90% of it mass, is found in the empty space between the 3 quarks that make up the particle, and presumably the neutron.
Try Google for more...
psycotria 9 months ago
@ilyLaura1
from In Search of Schrodinger's Cat by John Gribbin, pg. 196: "The uncertainty principle applies to the complementary properties of TIME and ENERGY, as well as to position/momentum...An electron does not exist in isolation, because it can borrow energy from the uncertainty relation, for a short enough period of time (less than 10 to the -15 seconds), and use it to create a photon...It is as if each electron is surrounded by a cloud of "virtual" photons, which.....
leisulin 2 weeks ago
@Laura
....which only need a little push, a little energy from outside, to escape and become real. An electron moving from an excited state to a lower state in an atom gives the excess energy to one of its virtual photons and lets it fly free..." Thus, most of the virtual photons that are literally coming from nothing are allowed to come into existence and exist for a VERY short time before disappearing because of the Uncertainty Principle's uncertainty about time/energy(mass)....
leisulin 2 weeks ago
@Laura
So when you are staring into the glowing coals of a campfire, with all those red-colored photons entering your eye, each one of them has popped into existence out of thin air near (associated with) an electron in an atom in one of the coals, been given a quantum of energy from the atom in the heat of the fire going to a lower energy state, and is thereby allowed to no longer be merely "virtual" but to be persistent and have plenty of time to fly across over to your eye.
leisulin 2 weeks ago
@Laura
Which doesn't mean that the virtual particles aren't real. They're real, and appearing out of thin air. But they're living on borrowed time, literally, and the Uncertainty Principle requires them, all things being equal, to vanish again almost immediately. But during that time period "the universe" is permitted to be uncertain whether there is a small amount of matter there (that wasn't there a moment before) or not, i.e. a particle can appear "out of thin air"....
leisulin 2 weeks ago
The other place where stuff appears out of nowhere due to the Uncertainty Principle is near the event horizon of a black hole. Pairs of particles appear out of nowhere right at the event horizon and sometimes the two particles never get a chance to recombine and vanish because one of them falls into the hole and the other gets to go on living by escaping the hole. This is the phenomenon that brings about black hole evaporation.
leisulin 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@leisulin The universe was birthed when gaseous pressure became much more than atmospheric pressure, from a static boundless three dimensional vacuum space of gravity and energy.
Rookerfy 1 week ago
If there is a designer for this universe then this designer knows exactly how it will end: /watch?v=cv7lCR-7AKQ
helasmoh 9 months ago
@bluedevil1642
The universe was NOT created out of nothing. Watch my video response to this video: Quran Vs. Lawrence Krauss and "A Universe From Nothing" : /watch?v=cv7lCR-7AKQ
helasmoh 9 months ago
Comment removed
christhrasher 10 months ago
no clue dreaming stuff.
orgolioitalia1 10 months ago
@Shadi1007 "There isn't anything that "pops into existence" from nothing. ..."
Watch 'A Universe From Nothing' by Lawrence Krause - watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo
psycotria 10 months ago
@Shadi1007 God is the fairy tale! And yes I agree M-theory need to be put under experimental tests in order for it to become a scientific theory! However there are ways of finding these hidden dimensions suggested by M-theory. One is by observing the lost energy after particle collisions in the LHC and the others are performing experiments based on the theory of Quantum Entanglements. The latter is the most feasible due to our current technology. And Quantum Mechanics is not a theory anymore!
FallofDarkness55 10 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 "... And Quantum Mechanics is not a theory anymore!"
While I agree with your comment, a 'Theory' is never promoted to 'Fact'. Such would be a demotion, because a scientific theory is the Explanation that takes Facts with which Predictions are made.
The fact of evolution is explained by the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection. The fact of gravity is explained by the Newtonian Theory and in breaking news, the Theory of General Relativity. (See Gravity Probe B.)
psycotria 9 months ago
@psycotria Yes. I know all about that. I printed out Nasa's article on the Gravity Probe B and the recent findings that confirmed Einstein's theory of general relativity! The same logic applies to quantum mechanics via quantum experiments that have confirmed the theories of QM! I realize they are not considered to be facts but in my world they are after many confirmations of a theory! Not to mention the fact that I have witnessed these properties ( i.e. diffraction etc.) in my physics 3 lab!
FallofDarkness55 9 months ago
@Shadi1007 Wrong! The answers that the theoretical physicists are getting are finite! It is not infinity! At least their theory has been proved with mathematics whereas god has not been proven whatsoever! God is the bullshit answer! In fact quantum mechanics and god are contradictory if you think about it logically! An intelligent designer follows a sequential set of steps, so to speak, whereas quantum mechanics is very unpredictable, thus QM eliminates god's existence. M-theory is the way to go
FallofDarkness55 10 months ago
@Shadi1007 Quantum fluctuations are essentially energy at the heart of all matter and therefore there are things constantly popping into existence every fraction of a second. This all makes sense when you invoke the powerful unified theory...M-theory!
FallofDarkness55 11 months ago
Ok lemme start off by saying im not a creationist. But this nonsense contradicts itself several times that i cant sit threw and watch its retardation all the way threw.
Visc0us1488 11 months ago
"lets assert that some kind of space time quantum foam existed" lol are you serious? You should replace "assert" with "pretend" .
ArboriusOwns 11 months ago
The dumbest thing you can EVER do is to try and fill any gaps with "god" or any sort of higher power.
baahhhFATALITY11 11 months ago
When it all boils down to it no matter how you try to discredit GOD; it had to be a supreme being that created all of this knowledge that we see. It's to fascinating, it's to perfect, it had a design and he made us to figure him out with knowledge and debating. He knew unbeliever would be there too. What can you say God got you figure out, because he'll infinite in knowledge. Amen
stevejon71 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stevejon71 "... it had to be a supreme being that created all of this knowledge that we see. It's to fascinating, it's to perfect ..."
Appeal to Incredulity = FAIL
"... it had a design and he made us to figure him out with knowledge and debating. He knew unbeliever would be there too. ... because he'll infinite in knowledge ..."
One baseless Assertion after another. BELIEVE whatever you like, but you can't KNOW what you claim. It just 'sounds good' to you.
psycotria 10 months ago
I have a solution to what created Space quantum something...Example: imagine that your living room is empty, you couldn't see anything right? no color to interfere, because when you have nothing there is NO color...There is Nothing, that was before anything nothing...NOTHING!!
freedomland11 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We have Nothing – Void - Vacuum
The Vacuum is Homogeneous Space of the lowest
level of Energy: E= 0 and temperature: T= 0K
It means that the ‘ Dirac virtual particles’, which exist there,
are energetic particles.
Questions:
What are the physical and geometrical parameters of
these virtual particles?
How can these virtual particles to become real particles ? Israel Sadovnik Socratus
israelsocratus 11 months ago
@DishrackDarwin haha looks whos talking haha you say i got bad english look at you " ur a pussy" haha think before u type haha they thought you that in second grade hahah XD!!!!!!!!!
julioloaiza100 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
"ur" as in "you are"
you really are not very bright huh?
high school must really be hard for you
so is english your first or second language?
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth its my third language and i didnt put "ur" you did read right!!
julioloaiza100 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
well third times the charm, you will get it right one of these days
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth Haha no one is perfect !!!!!!!!!!! XD
julioloaiza100 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
agreed, especially dishrack, he is a complete tool
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
"they thought you that in second grade"
i think you mean "taught"
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100 my bad dishrackdarwin i wuznt saying it to u lolz sorry
julioloaiza100 11 months ago
@DishrackDarwin
oh i get it, you are julioloaiza100, that is why he is stupid and lazy
nice try troll
watch?v=UhMaD8v0rTQ&lc
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth haha i laugh at you megadouche lolz jaja tell me something what do you think of your self?????????????? hahahha
julioloaiza100 1 year ago
i still dont get how a dumb energy source created a complex universe i dont see how thats possible
julioloaiza100 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
"i dont see how thats possible"
of course you don't, you are a dipshit
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth explain how im a dipshit
julioloaiza100 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
shall i start with how you type? or that you are too lazy to do some basic science research?
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth still didnt awnser my question
julioloaiza100 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
well, which do you want me to start with? lazy or stupid?
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth hmmm lets start with your mom bitch man bitch please ive seen u argue with other people in other videos and judging on your stupid comments your not worth my time hoe
julioloaiza100 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
more fine christian commentary
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
word
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
hmmmm lets start with your comments:
"bitch" "faggot" "bitch" "your mom" "hoe"
i am guessing that you are stupid and lazy
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth u do know what it mean when you say "I GUESS" your not worth my time
julioloaiza100 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
"u do know what ir mean" "your not worth my time"
i sure hope english is your second language, but i will put it this way, i know you are stupid and lazy
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth haha it is megadouche hahaha dude dont jot down shit about people you dont know about XD fucking megadouche
julioloaiza100 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
where specifically did i "jot down" incorrect info?
you are lazy and you are stupid
you believe that god created this whole thing, well provide evidence for it
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth HAHA XD your making my day by making me laugh megadouche dude your so ignorant and stupid if that even i told you you wouldnt believe me hahahahahha!!!! XD besides why im i going to lie i dont got evidence but someone out there does i dont know who so sont ask faggot!!!!!
julioloaiza100 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
"your so ignorant and stupid if that even i told you"
yup, you are stupid, check
"i dont got evidence but someone out there does i dont know who"
yup, you are lazy
classic self pwnage
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100
no wonder you are friends with dishrack, you two have the same IQ
70
MrMegatruth 1 year ago
@MrMegatruth well at least its higher than yours XD hahahahaahah !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
julioloaiza100 1 year ago
@julioloaiza100 "... even i told you you wouldnt believe me ..."
That doesn't excuse you from the requirement to provide evidence to back up what otherwise is baseless assertion.
psycotria 10 months ago
is this Quantum Loop Gravity ?
Edfiki86 1 year ago
Im too stupid to understand all of this but not stupid enough to think that some greater being created all of this.
MrYAPP0 1 year ago
This video wasn't successful. It's still very confusing and boring. Sorry.
hottfusspott 1 year ago
its kinda weird and silly that something was created out of nothing but as physicist michio kaku said something wonderful that "its only the question of how we define nothingness"
iksahir 1 year ago
@iksahir
watch my video reply "Quran Vs. Lawrence Krauss and "A Universe From Nothing".
/watch?v=cv7lCR-7AKQ
helasmoh 1 year ago
@helasmoh Why bother watching your lies about the Quran?
Isn't it funny that the only things "revealed" by the Quran are only known about after science has discovered them? If all of this knowledge was in it, why aren't most (hell...even some) scientific advancements coming from devout Muslims?
MrFungus420 1 year ago
@MrFungus420
Everything in my video was stated clearly in the Quran long before our scientists proved it. If you want indisputable proof that the Quran was way ahead of our scientists then watch my other video "Richard Dawkins Exposed - Evolution Proves God". /watch?v=Ugu3cZN-3jU
Do you what was evolution name before it became Darwin's?
helasmoh 1 year ago
@helasmoh All Religious Books Are Full Of Lies and Stupidity. They're all Faerie tell Stories like Santa Clauss Storie. They never explaint nothing but Crap.........
JHNBK 1 year ago
@JHNBK Maybe you should improve your English so that you can actually read the books correctly?
actionreplayman07 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@helasmoh All Religious Books Are Full Of Lies and Stupidity. They're all Faerie tell Stories like Santa Clauss Storie. They never explain nothing but Crap.........
JHNBK 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@helasmoh All Religious Books Are Full Of Lies and Stupidity. They're all Faerie tell Stories like Santa Clauss Storie. They never explain nothing but Crap.........
JHNBK 1 year ago