This movie suggests that Darwinism is akin to fascism, that "Big Science" is imposing itself on ID advocates rights to free speech. As you edit which comments are seen and which are not, I hope that the irony of your actions is not lost on you. Is your position so weak, it cannot withstand debate? How can you stand up for free speech when you snub it so blatantly?
The biggest questions known to Science are, "How did life begin and how did the universe come to be". Evolution Science proponents are no longer willing to position themselves by attempting to answer these two questions, they are clueless. The reason Evolution Scientist refuse to answer these two questions is because it is impossible to answer them without suggesting something beyond scientific understanding happened, something "Larger than Life like God".
The emails are now part of the public record, revealed in the report from the US House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform. The committee's staff investigation demonstrates that "Sternberg's civil and constitutional rights were violated": "In emails exchanged during August and September 2004, NMNH officials revealed their intent to use their government jobs to discriminate against scientists based on their outside activities regarding evolution.
I respect your right to believe in your religion of Darwinism. I respect your right to believe that you're related to a 3 foot Chimp named Lucy, I'll even fight for your right to believe in the "Magic of Spontaneous Transitions" as a desperate effort to explain why there are no transitional fossils showing cows evolving into whales etc., etc., but your religion should not be tax supported.
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." ...Charles Darwin.
There is a reason why it is called the Evolutionary Theory.. It is a theory..It can not be proven.. No one was there when it happened.. So it has to be taken on faith..
We call things that have to be taken on faith religion..
It is called a theory because it is a unifying model used to explain observable evidence. Are we taking gravity on faith? Also, in regards to this whole peer review conspiracy garbage, I feel I should point out that any which possess actual scientific credentials (such as Behe) can simply send preprints of their "scientific evidence" directly to scientists - BUT DON'T. Now why is that?
By your argument, gravity is a religion because it too is a theory... I mean you just have to take it on faith that The Universal Theory of Gravity is not a hoax, right?
I strongly support Stein's right to say whatever he wants and to make this movie. Good for him. That said, it really is pathetic that someone so educated cannot grasp evolution. Make no mistake, this movie only claims to be about silencing scientists [obviously a bad thing] but it all comes from Stein's ideology that evolution is a bad theory. I intend to give the film a chance, but I'm predicting that it's tainted by his ignorant circa 1930s mentality.
WARNING ATHEIST BRAINWASHING EMPLOYEES: The word is out that 50 Darwinian Scientist (acting undercover as normal "objective" Doctors) had confirmed Piltdown Man as legitimate. 40 years later Dr. Kenneth Oakley exposed it as a forgery. Although several tell tale signs were very evident upon close inspection, much to Dr. Oakley's amazement 50 out of 52 Doctors went along with the lie. The Piltdown man was the head of a human with the jaw from an ape. Avoid this story!
Is this guy stupid or what? Freedom of speech doesn't mean that you get to say whatever you want and we can't point and laugh at you when you suggest some "magical sky wizard dunnit".
the overwhelming majority of people in this world are not Christians, and the overwhelming majority of people in this world do NOT believe in DARWINISM. but i'm sick and tired of hearing the Darwinian's accuse everybody who opposes evolutionary theology as being nut case Christian's, every Christian I've ever talked to describes their belief system as being a faith based religion full of healthy values like the 10 Commandments, i may not be one but i'll defend anyone with good values!
read "Bones of Contention" by Dr. Marvin Lubenow. Marvin took X-rays of all the original skeletal evidence. other medical professionals have collaborated that the earlier man used his teeth as a tool like the Ausi-Abo's and as a result of more muscular activity it causes bones to grow bigger, but instead of "Darwinian Evo-tard Monopoly" presenting both opinions of differing scientific opinions they only present the evidence that supports their agenda, about everything, eh?
This movie suggests that Darwinism is akin to fascism, that "Big Science" is imposing itself on ID advocates rights to free speech. As you edit which comments are seen and which are not, I hope that the irony of your actions is not lost on you. Is your position so weak, it cannot withstand debate? How can you stand up for free speech when you snub it so blatantly?
CorndogMaker 4 years ago
The biggest questions known to Science are, "How did life begin and how did the universe come to be". Evolution Science proponents are no longer willing to position themselves by attempting to answer these two questions, they are clueless. The reason Evolution Scientist refuse to answer these two questions is because it is impossible to answer them without suggesting something beyond scientific understanding happened, something "Larger than Life like God".
MsLatosi 4 years ago
Evolution Science caught in scam!
The emails are now part of the public record, revealed in the report from the US House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform. The committee's staff investigation demonstrates that "Sternberg's civil and constitutional rights were violated": "In emails exchanged during August and September 2004, NMNH officials revealed their intent to use their government jobs to discriminate against scientists based on their outside activities regarding evolution.
MsLatosi 4 years ago
I respect your right to believe in your religion of Darwinism. I respect your right to believe that you're related to a 3 foot Chimp named Lucy, I'll even fight for your right to believe in the "Magic of Spontaneous Transitions" as a desperate effort to explain why there are no transitional fossils showing cows evolving into whales etc., etc., but your religion should not be tax supported.
MsLatosi 4 years ago
Here's a list of more than 700 Professors and Doctors from the most established Universities in the world who doubt Dawrinism.
(dissentfromdarwin(dot)org) Thousands more would love to sign, when they no longer fear being "Expelled". See Ben Stein's Movie.
MsLatosi 4 years ago
"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." ...Charles Darwin.
MsLatosi 4 years ago
Ah! Omigosh! A movie criticizing Darwinian Evolution! Crap!
Don't see what the big deal is here... Don't get all worked up about a movie, please...
ShotoNyamar 4 years ago
There is a reason why it is called the Evolutionary Theory.. It is a theory..It can not be proven.. No one was there when it happened.. So it has to be taken on faith..
We call things that have to be taken on faith religion..
suedee7x7 4 years ago
The faith in question is based upon mountains of evidence, both fossil and genetic.
Sweetkittenpie 4 years ago
Mountains of Evidence, You are so funny!
patcondellTGAGroup 4 years ago
It is called a theory because it is a unifying model used to explain observable evidence. Are we taking gravity on faith? Also, in regards to this whole peer review conspiracy garbage, I feel I should point out that any which possess actual scientific credentials (such as Behe) can simply send preprints of their "scientific evidence" directly to scientists - BUT DON'T. Now why is that?
limbopete 4 years ago
By your argument, gravity is a religion because it too is a theory... I mean you just have to take it on faith that The Universal Theory of Gravity is not a hoax, right?
CaptainKelly7 4 years ago
I strongly support Stein's right to say whatever he wants and to make this movie. Good for him. That said, it really is pathetic that someone so educated cannot grasp evolution. Make no mistake, this movie only claims to be about silencing scientists [obviously a bad thing] but it all comes from Stein's ideology that evolution is a bad theory. I intend to give the film a chance, but I'm predicting that it's tainted by his ignorant circa 1930s mentality.
eggnogdog 4 years ago
WARNING ATHEIST BRAINWASHING EMPLOYEES: The word is out that 50 Darwinian Scientist (acting undercover as normal "objective" Doctors) had confirmed Piltdown Man as legitimate. 40 years later Dr. Kenneth Oakley exposed it as a forgery. Although several tell tale signs were very evident upon close inspection, much to Dr. Oakley's amazement 50 out of 52 Doctors went along with the lie. The Piltdown man was the head of a human with the jaw from an ape. Avoid this story!
CurtusLove 4 years ago
Is this guy stupid or what? Freedom of speech doesn't mean that you get to say whatever you want and we can't point and laugh at you when you suggest some "magical sky wizard dunnit".
ReligionIsACrutch 4 years ago
No, you are right, It was not a Wizard lol.
A wizard would not have a teeny spec of Intelligent's as God, 'our Intelligent Designer...
patcondellTGAGroup 4 years ago
the overwhelming majority of people in this world are not Christians, and the overwhelming majority of people in this world do NOT believe in DARWINISM. but i'm sick and tired of hearing the Darwinian's accuse everybody who opposes evolutionary theology as being nut case Christian's, every Christian I've ever talked to describes their belief system as being a faith based religion full of healthy values like the 10 Commandments, i may not be one but i'll defend anyone with good values!
CurtusLove 4 years ago
read "Bones of Contention" by Dr. Marvin Lubenow. Marvin took X-rays of all the original skeletal evidence. other medical professionals have collaborated that the earlier man used his teeth as a tool like the Ausi-Abo's and as a result of more muscular activity it causes bones to grow bigger, but instead of "Darwinian Evo-tard Monopoly" presenting both opinions of differing scientific opinions they only present the evidence that supports their agenda, about everything, eh?
CurtusLove 4 years ago
I have searched with no results so far. If I manage to come across it, I will feature it.
patcondellTGAGroup 4 years ago