That's how we should see it, strenght rather than weakness. I'm sure the Government already know about these beings, just not sure they necessarily cover it, they simply don't comment I guess. Probably for those very religious reasons, and uncertainty of public reaction. But even if they did prevent it actively, they couldn't keep it hidden forever if it's a mere primate of flesh and blood, especially now with DNA study coming. Other nations also have the beings, so eventually we'll know anyway.
The government knows the sasquatch species exist but dont want to acknowledge it. Why? Because it will further stregthen the belief that A we are part of the ape DNA tree, and B it will send a shockwave throughout religions, which the government cant allow because it will bring panic and change the history books aswell the way we look at man as a species. Governments strive on religion. Especially the US's. But IMO it does not shatter my belief in a all matter and life creator, but stregthens it
There's 100s if not 1000s of Bigfoots out there, probably. US nationwide, of course. It's a species of primate very closely related to humans, in fact it may even be human as DNA examination now seems to support. That also explains the bones questions fine, they bury their dead obviously.
@reclaimerReclaimer That's trhe type of thing non beleiver jerks dont take into account, they'd say anything is a man in a suit because they're scared.
where are all the dead bigfoots? if there are females and immature bigfoots, where do their bodies go when they die? and why is actual evidence so rare? because there is ONLY ONE bigfoot out there, and he will live for ever, and his name is cain.
@eminboztepe the preportions of the body, and the shape of the brow and forehead done allow for a human head to fit. The forehead slants to much to accompany a human head. And at that time there we NO ape suits of that quality, especially for an amateur with no money.
Instead of looking a the body of the evidence and hoax after hoax after hoax being exposed over long periods of history people take something they want to believe and see only those things that helps their belief in what is given to them in a phony setup video. That suit was doctored and improved by adding water or jelly filled crap inside it adding even more to the confusion. if bigfoot was a new species of bird nobody would care--but instead its an ape--with hairy breasts--unknown in nature
Man gets obsessed with bigfoot--is writing a book and doing a movie behind the scenes but gets no backing. Borrows and expensive camera-goes to the area which the person admitted he had been putting the fake prints as others do. amazingly he captures footage of a perfect woman bigfoot walking along--no companions or protective males and no other evidence found. makes a bundle off it with everyone confessing including the guy in the suit. Then people get lost in details of poor footage for years
@Allanlegacy43 its also been proven that a human head can not possibly fit into a "mask" of that shape. Nor could a person comfortably walk with that sort of a stride, our knees simply dont bend that way. I personally think if there was ever a bigfoot caught on film, this is it.
@1:49: A quick size estimation: The tracks were 14.5 inches. There are about 6 lengths of an approximate 14.5 inch foot as seen at 1:49. That makes 14.5 x 6 = 87 inches = 7 ft. 3 inches.
The cone shaped head is also very realistic as well look at the hair on the back of the kneck anddown the back it is darker than the rest of the torso and blends exactly into the back of the head. On fake costumes you can always see the area between where the shoulders end and where the mask starts, in this there is no gap it's one continous flow as we humans have long necks and this creature does not!
Nobody cares about your daily mad babble, eminaidiot. Anatomy's important because Patty's build is what kills your hoax lie, so naturally a duped git like you would much rather spam and rant about everything else but the countless points proving it no suit. You never had a good case, except a bad cold maybe, but your PGF fake rumors have each and every one all been firmly layed to rest for good. High time to realize you were wrong all aLong, led astray by traditional tabloid trash thinking. lol
""komo the paedo still clueless and giving herself two thumbs up...you dumb fuck..still not one hair sample you prick..""
Do your bosses at Chester zoo know that you hang out on You Tube bigfoot message boards making accusations against bigfoot 'believers'.
I wonder what they would think of you if they found out? There can't be many primate shit shovellers at Chester zoo. I think it can be narrowed down to who you are. You used to post on Bigfoot Forums spouting off as well.
Wrong. Bigfoot's merely a goofy name from the 1950s, the beings have been reported for centuries and part of Indian culture ever since. Like every other living thing out there, no different or anything strange. And stop already with those laughable white feet pad excuses. The film's old, get used to that.
There is an army of hoaxers all coordinated together over many many generations that have a preconceived plan to make a natural size distribution of footprints that all show certain similarities such as aspect ratios and dynamic signatures that interact with the correct shear forces on a given type of soil to form such footprints, often at large pace lengths and showing dermal ridges and scars at times. The hoaxers have the time, energy, money, sophistication, dedication, and means of access.
@rockstarzep or you just dont feal like beleiving in sasquatch, i doubt there are worldwide hoaxers groups, yes i've heared of crop circle hoaxer groups but come on.
Pgf , real footage of a real sasquach..heironimus is a gammy eyed fat cunt..ladies and gentlemen , thanks for reading...this report comes from jrld11 , the love machine
See, eminaidiot's so caught up in her BF lies she's trapped and can't get out of it, thus resorting to the old tactic of spamming. You have to love how she'll ignore all facts thrown her way, how human anatomy's the reason we can't fake BFs convincingly. Love the ignorance of that. Tall stunt guys don't cut it, you refuse to face you just don't grasp this. Sure sign of a mad mind. Anatomy's the key, not size. Dummy. That's why all BF movies look silly humanly fake, and real ones like PGF do not.
This is the part that always gets me. Didn't roger say it was 6ft something? Then you have people stating it as fact it was 7ft? Who says? How did they get that number? Please tell me it was someone other then Bill Munns cause we all know that was flawed so who else was it? I would like to go read it for myself and see if it is scientific, unbiased fact.
Of course you're not eminaidiot, since your here babbling your silly spam 24/7. But you don't have to worry, before you'll get a reply from me on your useless excuses Bigfoot will be proven real. So why don't you just relax and wait for that. lol
Been a big Yeti fan my whole life. Curious if anyone has read the new book THE ICE GORILLA? I only ask because I read movie producers are looking at turning THE ICE GORILLA book into a movie. does anyone know this to be true?
The only one changing subjects here is your denying mind eminbozo, and that sad state we're all quite aware of, thank you very much. I present anatomical proof why Patty's real, to anyone smart enough to read and decide, you merely spam and babble 24/7. Now tell me sincerely, which tactic do you think is working best? lol
No one's lying more than you eminaidiot, so why don't you just give up the charade it's beyond sad by now. Patty's proven 7ft and not a damn thing you can do about it, she's estimated to be that already in Green's 1968 book. You have also been presented with anatomical proof, why your friend BobH's the lousiest candidate you could probably pick. There's not one single thing on Patty, that fits with him or any other person for that matter. It's called anatomy, the word and meaning you don't like.
So you're basically wrong on just about everything you say, and yet you say no one as of yet can refute any of the "facts" in your video? Priceless. So our two options are - to go with your opinions, or to listen & go with the opinions of highly credible scientists instead. That's a tough one....gonna have to think about it for awhile.
No, I am basically "wrong" on facts that YOU claim I made.
Show me wher I ever said that Al DeAtley was at Bluff Creek the day it was shot. You can't, because I never did. The film was MAILED TO Al for him to get it developed.
- as well as a description of Bluff Creek that doesn't match the PGF, said the PGF has been edited, but Bill Munns examined a 1st generation copy of the film from Patricia Patterson, and he said it wasn't edited, said scientists aren't as knowledgable as you because you wore costumes before, and no scientists believe the PGF is real.
You can't be serious eminboztepe. You made a video centered around a Star Trek mask, said DeAtley was at Bluff Creek the day the film was shot, said DNA evidence doesn't exist in the face of the Ketchum report being released, said Bob H is the guy in the suit, even though he gave 2 completely different descriptions of the suit -
Dr. Melba Ketchum update: When we started this, I thought we'd be finished in a few weeks, but instead as Sasquatch are known to do, they threw us curve balls even with their DNA which can be as elusive as they are.we are past that!As a result, we have assembled a renowned team, to make this project "extraordinary". If everyone will hang in there, I promise it will be worth the wait. We have the proof, now just give us the opportunity to present it in a form that will even convince skeptics.
More of your insane spam, eh eminbozo. Get used to the idea you religious freak; Bigfoots really live out there in nature, not a damn thing you can do about it. Denial won't change that.
Exactly right, well put. Folks need to get over this monster nonsense. This is obviously not a monster, or all the witnesses wouldn't live to tell about it, but a shy humanlike primate. Perhaps even eventually classified as human, my money's on that outcome anyway. Therein also lies the likely explanation for no interest in the subject, from mainstream science and governments. There's never been any (official) government backed expedition looking into it, despite a whole nation's big interest.
I never knew about it being a "her" until I watched Finding Bigfoot on Animal Planet.So cool you can see her breasts moving.That solidified its existence for me.I just dont understand how humans think we know everything about this planet and dismiss the possiblity of new species.We're naive.We should view bigfoot as an animal not a paranormal monster.
The other day on "finding bigfoot" moneymaker said bigfoot can't be photographed or captured. but he didn't explain the reasoning for either one. Convienent huh?
@eminboztepe They're rare. They may even be extinct now. Scientists predict that only a few thousand exist. And what if somebody saw and took a picture with a cell phone or shot some video? It would be dismissed. The thing that makes the patterson footage unique is that it was made at a time where aside from somebody walking around in a suit it was impossible to fake.
Notice the peoples obsession with footprint casts--the only thing they have. also notice that they are selling something. all these creatures running all over the place--multiple states and on vancouver island leaving thousands of prints but never seen or found, Children big feet--whole families--but nothing but casts of prints that were made for them to find.. footprints imply something was there but nothing can be found so people expand endlessly on their minds science of the prints..
@KeyWestBluesX Uh they're seen all the time retard.Big mysterious feet in the middle of the woods wouldn't keep a centuries old legend going.You're ignorant of all the evidence because like a child you've jumped to a conclusion without doing any research
Yeah Munns and meldrum and all these Bigfooters avoid the bottom line on bigfoot----theres not a speck of scientific evidence for bigfoot. But that don't keep their gums from flapping.
I don't know who Ken is, you brough him up you utter emogeekess. lmao Yep retroll, you're in for a big embarrassing surprise. lol It already is fact of course, many of us know that, you unfortunately not one of them. But you will be in good time, rest assured. The shape and colour, retroll? What about it. Typical BF physique. There is absolutely no way this is a suit, no freaking possibility. At all. Never been debunked, on the contrary found real, so the BobHoax fiasco's for the easily fooled.
@reclaimerReclaimer Bob can try to prove his case with grilling and science and reinactment ANY time that he wishes. Oh, but he has that lie detector test where he looks absolutely scared to death which proves everything. He should come on Animal Planet to prove his case after they prove him wrong on Sunday night 9 pm EST.
@eminboztepe no but phillip morris and his wife were--and both confirmed the building of the suit in NC and selling it to RP who then did various modifications MANY people confessed including the 26 year old athlete in the suit who got screwed out of his payoff..Wilson who faked the prints in the area also confessed--but he had nothing to do with the rp film and felt sorry for him because of the cancer. All interviews with people describe RP as con man, liar and showboater desperate for money
The suit didn't come from Morris. Morris made Halloween costumes. The suit in the film was from Hollywood. Roger knew Janos Prohaska through Corriganville. Roger even bought some of Corrigan's gorilla costumes when Corriganville was being liquidated (and sold to Bob Hope). Roger may have contacted Morris, but he didn't use his suit. The headpiece came from Wah Chang (associate of Prohaska). See my youtube video for details.
Are you geeks still on about her feet on a blurry YT upload, are you for real? lol Again, why do you deniers think it's called a Bigfoot. Duh. Kinda known for having big humanlike feet, I'd say. Merry Ken, eminaidiot, we know you're lonely enough.
watch @1:28 to 1:34 a few dozen times and then say that it's a man in a suit. By the way, @1:49, the toes are seen on enhanced photography such as in Meldrum's book. Unless he is a fraud, then you can take the "he's wearing slippers" argument off the table. Aside from the muscle herniation, muscle shock upon stepdown, and muscle density seen in this video, you can see the face muscles move rapidly in the gait analysis video @2:56 and @2:57. I can even see the face fairly clearly @2:57.
Monster geekess eminaidiot keeps lying through the remaining pearlies, at least we have it in black and white to prove the one who mentioned any Ken whoever is eminaidiot. Damn she's dumb. lol Posters don't get banned for trolling eminaidiot, were that the case you'de not be here would you, ha. Get your facts straight, difficult I guess with all you 24/ account business.
And eminaidiot's so dumb she thinks that's not possible on a computer, she's the most clueless geek ever on YT. Now go blow yourself nastyfart31, you ugly tart...
@evilyakko As a matter of fact I do, in five minutes more precisely, haha. I'd say someone trolling Bigfoot videos without a genuine interest, is the major geek here. Shit, you're more clueless than two dried up pieces of snake vomit. lol
eminaidiot and all her fake YT accounts, it's a wonder she can keep track of them all, I see she still prefers the blind speller act for one of them. lmao
@reclaimerReclaimer told u fag i have one account ,,i also told u my address to say it to my face..31 caughall road upton chester...you dickless paedo...as ive told you ill snap you jaw off you total troll
Haha, what a sore loser that eminaidiot. Spending her entire scared life on YT talking about suits, how sad can it be to convince one self like that. lol
@reclaimerReclaimer u stupid cunt you spent all your time here thts why you got banned for trolling and copyright infringment komo the paedo ...you ducmb fuck
@reclaimerReclaimer too my face told you komo fag ill rip your spine out..you gutless faggot..keep typing im emin ...fact is gay boy im not never have been...one account cunt face ...gave you my address countless times fact is your a fag rent boy queer cocksmoking gutless troll who never leaves the shit hole you call home,,31 cuaghall road upton chester..ill put you in a body bag and do the world a favor .you brain dead moron...
Yeah, well done retroll. Plenty of evidence, tracks are evidence. In the places these guys reside bones don't preserve well, yes, that is just fact. Footprints don't last a long time, unless you cast them first.
Wrong. The name was merely invented then, before that it was Hairy Man, Old Man, etc. These sightings go back centuries and yet modern deniers still doubt and deny, we're talking detailed descriptions of a primate being, not a white bewinged horse with a spiraling horn.
Bes---evolution can be seen in fossils. The animal we know as the horse has its evolutionary changes very well documented by fossil records. Bigfoot is an invention from the 1950s.
There are new animals being discovered everyday. Scientist have discovered a new species of the dog family that has been living in Texas and Mexico, and was just recently discovered. People believe in the theory of evolution just based on the speculations of scientist, with no actual proof, and yet they disbelieve the possibility of an undiscovered species living in the remote parts of the world?
holy shit!!! homosapien its homosapien.Evolution and its accompanying necessity of long ages of evolutionary development would be hard pressed to accommodate a living homosapien
Any month will do for me, retro. Who really cares about the year or the dates, important thing is getting it on camera and that's going to happen more frequently from now on - not less.
Well, you're notoriously gullible so you might as well ask Donald Duck. There's zero resemblance to anything ever created in Hollywood, and they usually strive for realism, but do show us a movie BF looking like this. You'll have a hard time finding one, hence, your silence. The fluffy undefined movie suits all look the only way the can, which is anatomically human and the very opposite of the reported primate-like descriptions. This info you'll ignore, we know, it speaks volumes that you do.
Let's apply Occam's Razor here. Which is more likely:
A) Roger, a well known hoaxer and conman who had Hollywood FX connections, a man no stranger to showbiz, conveniently films a real bigfoot after his movie fails. This bigfoot, filmed in the 60's, has 60's costume characteristics and its face perfectly matches a headpiece of that time period originally worn by a co-worker of Roger and made by a F/X man he knew.
The guy who wore the suit already came out and confessed a while ago. As well as the person who sold the suit to Patterson weeks before the footage was shot.
Nah, go ahead retro and try copy that figure on the ridge... I'd love to see how you're gonna pull it off, with those arms working naturally from the shoulders 8ft up...
I love how Patty really fooled so many, to think she's supposed to be a bad Hollywood costume. Something never proven, so flimsy rumors are swung together with no regards to sighting reports over time. One of these things got caught on camera, and gullibility abounds.
Let's apply Occam's Razor here. Which is more likely:
A) Roger, a well known hoaxer and conman who had Hollywood FX connections, a man no stranger to showbiz, conveniently films a real bigfoot after his movie fails. This bigfoot, filmed in the 60's, has 60's costume characteristics and its face perfectly matches a headpiece of that time period originally worn by a co-worker of Roger and made by a F/X man he knew.
For the RESEARCHERS- it's all practical jokes, false science, hoaxes, imagination, and misinterpretation. My faith is in the word of the DOUBTERS' stories, imagination, refusal of science, misinterpretation, and contradictions.
Hey Retro didn't you know even a blob from 1000 yds away or blobs on infrared or night vison are also bigfoot? Even innocent pics of the woods and old home movies are full of bigfoot. We didn't know it at the time but post production analyzation has found all kinds of the sneaky creatures. Might even be one hiding in the words of this comment from me.
Heh, nice eminbozo...no arguments as usual. Obviously not, in the light of even the most ordinary explanation regarding BobHat's limited physique, you can't refute any of these anatomical facts if the subject's only 6ft...and the legs supposed to be his. Facts, both visibly on screen and facts of then-f/x and facts of...wait for it...anatomy. You know, good old facts, evidence, proof. Oh, you'll call on fluffy Barney of course, only to make it all the more clear for us how wrong you are. :)
Even their legs don't match up, so there you go... Each and every bone, arm or leg, none fit a human's... The proportions are all off, and padding won't solve it when a guy inside couldn't reach to operate any of it. And 1 9 6 7, wake up... lol So a mere 6ft only, on account alone of her legs being fully visible, is not possible as her height and therefore it certainly can't be BobH the Bullshitter. Can't be any other human either, instead leaving above the 7ft range as a very realistic guess.
eminaidiot's now resorted back to jokes of Barney and such jive, it's her only means of argument left in the light of defeat. lol She knows the point of anatomy's crucial, and just below the surface even our hoax stubbornness herself knows it's no longer serious to claim it's fake, but won't budge an inch. Better go on than lose face, eh emina? ;) It's been successfully proven to be real, BobH's short torso alone did that for us, otherwise it'd be taller than 6ft since her legs are in full view.
And eminaidiot doesn't, that's why she's so jealous and can't stop babbling about Patty's.
reclaimerReclaimer 2 days ago
bigfoot has big tits
swat420 3 days ago
@swat420 its because this bigfoot was a girl
xXVarietyGamerxX 1 day ago
That's how we should see it, strenght rather than weakness. I'm sure the Government already know about these beings, just not sure they necessarily cover it, they simply don't comment I guess. Probably for those very religious reasons, and uncertainty of public reaction. But even if they did prevent it actively, they couldn't keep it hidden forever if it's a mere primate of flesh and blood, especially now with DNA study coming. Other nations also have the beings, so eventually we'll know anyway.
reclaimerReclaimer 2 weeks ago in playlist Bigfoot Patterson Film Look
@reclaimerReclaimer
dodge #753 komodidiot. You're babblin' again. Ken Peterson? Hmmm?
eminboztepe 3 days ago
@eminboztepe Dodge #3753 eminaidiot. You're babblin' again. Andre the Giant? Hmmm?
reclaimerReclaimer 3 days ago
@reclaimerReclaimer
dodge #754 komodidiot
eminboztepe 3 days ago
The government knows the sasquatch species exist but dont want to acknowledge it. Why? Because it will further stregthen the belief that A we are part of the ape DNA tree, and B it will send a shockwave throughout religions, which the government cant allow because it will bring panic and change the history books aswell the way we look at man as a species. Governments strive on religion. Especially the US's. But IMO it does not shatter my belief in a all matter and life creator, but stregthens it
SuMBuDDe42oE 2 weeks ago
There's 100s if not 1000s of Bigfoots out there, probably. US nationwide, of course. It's a species of primate very closely related to humans, in fact it may even be human as DNA examination now seems to support. That also explains the bones questions fine, they bury their dead obviously.
reclaimerReclaimer 2 weeks ago in playlist Bigfoot Patterson Film Look
@reclaimerReclaimer That's trhe type of thing non beleiver jerks dont take into account, they'd say anything is a man in a suit because they're scared.
Airsoftman67 2 weeks ago
where are all the dead bigfoots? if there are females and immature bigfoots, where do their bodies go when they die? and why is actual evidence so rare? because there is ONLY ONE bigfoot out there, and he will live for ever, and his name is cain.
Wizzardcat1 3 weeks ago
@eminboztepe the preportions of the body, and the shape of the brow and forehead done allow for a human head to fit. The forehead slants to much to accompany a human head. And at that time there we NO ape suits of that quality, especially for an amateur with no money.
RenegadeArms09 3 weeks ago
Instead of looking a the body of the evidence and hoax after hoax after hoax being exposed over long periods of history people take something they want to believe and see only those things that helps their belief in what is given to them in a phony setup video. That suit was doctored and improved by adding water or jelly filled crap inside it adding even more to the confusion. if bigfoot was a new species of bird nobody would care--but instead its an ape--with hairy breasts--unknown in nature
KeyWestBluesX 4 weeks ago
Man gets obsessed with bigfoot--is writing a book and doing a movie behind the scenes but gets no backing. Borrows and expensive camera-goes to the area which the person admitted he had been putting the fake prints as others do. amazingly he captures footage of a perfect woman bigfoot walking along--no companions or protective males and no other evidence found. makes a bundle off it with everyone confessing including the guy in the suit. Then people get lost in details of poor footage for years
KeyWestBluesX 4 weeks ago
@Allanlegacy43 its also been proven that a human head can not possibly fit into a "mask" of that shape. Nor could a person comfortably walk with that sort of a stride, our knees simply dont bend that way. I personally think if there was ever a bigfoot caught on film, this is it.
RenegadeArms09 1 month ago
@RenegadeArms09
Oh really? I have a picture of the mask they used on my youtube video. Anyone could wear it. It's a hoax.
eminboztepe 3 weeks ago
Could be a hairy person.
poopapotamis 1 month ago
Dodge #503 komodidiot
eminboztepe 1 month ago
I think sasquatches are real but I wish they had more proof or they just sound "mad"
computerxboxglitches 1 month ago
@1:49: A quick size estimation: The tracks were 14.5 inches. There are about 6 lengths of an approximate 14.5 inch foot as seen at 1:49. That makes 14.5 x 6 = 87 inches = 7 ft. 3 inches.
rockstarzep 1 month ago
The cone shaped head is also very realistic as well look at the hair on the back of the kneck anddown the back it is darker than the rest of the torso and blends exactly into the back of the head. On fake costumes you can always see the area between where the shoulders end and where the mask starts, in this there is no gap it's one continous flow as we humans have long necks and this creature does not!
Allanlegacy43 1 month ago
Nobody cares about your daily mad babble, eminaidiot. Anatomy's important because Patty's build is what kills your hoax lie, so naturally a duped git like you would much rather spam and rant about everything else but the countless points proving it no suit. You never had a good case, except a bad cold maybe, but your PGF fake rumors have each and every one all been firmly layed to rest for good. High time to realize you were wrong all aLong, led astray by traditional tabloid trash thinking. lol
reclaimerReclaimer 1 month ago 2
Dodge #507 komodoidiot aka reclaimer
Why are you babblin' about anatomy? What does that have to do with Ken Peterson or me wanting a recreation, lol?
Geek.
eminboztepe 1 month ago
What? You're babbling again, eminbubba. We can't help it if anatomy's not quite your strongest side. lol
reclaimerReclaimer 1 month ago
LOL! Exactly komododiot the geek still continues to dodge while giving herself thumbs up on her babblin' bullshit posts.
eminboztepe 1 month ago
Comment removed
reclaimerReclaimer 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
komo the paedo still clueless and giving herself two thumbs up...you dumb fuck..still not one hair sample you prick..
nastymonsters2 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nastymonsters2
""komo the paedo still clueless and giving herself two thumbs up...you dumb fuck..still not one hair sample you prick..""
Do your bosses at Chester zoo know that you hang out on You Tube bigfoot message boards making accusations against bigfoot 'believers'.
I wonder what they would think of you if they found out? There can't be many primate shit shovellers at Chester zoo. I think it can be narrowed down to who you are. You used to post on Bigfoot Forums spouting off as well.
LaughingGravy31 1 month ago
That comment just shows he's not the only one who's wrong, you're too. lol
reclaimerReclaimer 1 month ago
Wrong. Bigfoot's merely a goofy name from the 1950s, the beings have been reported for centuries and part of Indian culture ever since. Like every other living thing out there, no different or anything strange. And stop already with those laughable white feet pad excuses. The film's old, get used to that.
reclaimerReclaimer 2 months ago 4
Many generations? Bigfoot is a term from the 1950s. Many generations. Riiiight.
seymourbbest 2 months ago
@seymourbbest
Exactly Seymour. Exactly.
eminboztepe 1 month ago
There is an army of hoaxers all coordinated together over many many generations that have a preconceived plan to make a natural size distribution of footprints that all show certain similarities such as aspect ratios and dynamic signatures that interact with the correct shear forces on a given type of soil to form such footprints, often at large pace lengths and showing dermal ridges and scars at times. The hoaxers have the time, energy, money, sophistication, dedication, and means of access.
rockstarzep 2 months ago 7
@rockstarzep or you just dont feal like beleiving in sasquatch, i doubt there are worldwide hoaxers groups, yes i've heared of crop circle hoaxer groups but come on.
Airsoftman67 2 weeks ago
@Airsoftman67 I do believe, so things just can't be hoaxed such as groupings and patterns of raw data that is deemed legitimate.
rockstarzep 2 weeks ago
@rockstarzep I meant to say "some things"
rockstarzep 2 weeks ago
I wish this was real but unfortunately, if you look closely, you'll see that the feet have white pads on them, proving it's a costume. :(
961Random 2 months ago
Dodge #470 komodoidiot aka reclaimer
eminboztepe 2 months ago
Pgf , real footage of a real sasquach..heironimus is a gammy eyed fat cunt..ladies and gentlemen , thanks for reading...this report comes from jrld11 , the love machine
Jrld11 2 months ago 2
And another one from eminaidiot aka any fake YT BF denier account you care to mention, we're talking total Loopy City here, folks.
reclaimerReclaimer 2 months ago 2
Dodge #464 komodidiot aka reclaimer
eminboztepe 2 months ago
See, eminaidiot's so caught up in her BF lies she's trapped and can't get out of it, thus resorting to the old tactic of spamming. You have to love how she'll ignore all facts thrown her way, how human anatomy's the reason we can't fake BFs convincingly. Love the ignorance of that. Tall stunt guys don't cut it, you refuse to face you just don't grasp this. Sure sign of a mad mind. Anatomy's the key, not size. Dummy. That's why all BF movies look silly humanly fake, and real ones like PGF do not.
reclaimerReclaimer 2 months ago 3
"Check" is another dodge and more spam.
Dodge #459 komodidiot aka reclaimer.
eminboztepe 2 months ago
Check.
reclaimerReclaimer 2 months ago
Dodge #458 komodoidiot aka reclaimer
eminboztepe 2 months ago
Bob off, eminbozo.
reclaimerReclaimer 2 months ago
Dodge #452 komodoidiot
eminboztepe 2 months ago
Wrong emianidiot, I'm not answering your crap yet you spam in. What you're doing is called spamming. Ubergeekess. lol
reclaimerReclaimer 2 months ago 2
This is the part that always gets me. Didn't roger say it was 6ft something? Then you have people stating it as fact it was 7ft? Who says? How did they get that number? Please tell me it was someone other then Bill Munns cause we all know that was flawed so who else was it? I would like to go read it for myself and see if it is scientific, unbiased fact.
ffmcmav40 2 months ago
Dodge #443 komodoidiot aka reclaimer
You keep responding without backing up your claim. That's YOUR spam, not mine.
Geek.
eminboztepe 2 months ago
Of course you're not eminaidiot, since your here babbling your silly spam 24/7. But you don't have to worry, before you'll get a reply from me on your useless excuses Bigfoot will be proven real. So why don't you just relax and wait for that. lol
reclaimerReclaimer 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Been a big Yeti fan my whole life. Curious if anyone has read the new book THE ICE GORILLA? I only ask because I read movie producers are looking at turning THE ICE GORILLA book into a movie. does anyone know this to be true?
prehistoric28 2 months ago
i think it is real
SuperUtubesucks 2 months ago
dodge #441 komododiot aka reclaimer
You're babblin' again. Ken Peterson? I wanted a recreation?
Never letting you off the hook you geek. Sorry! lol
eminboztepe 2 months ago
The only one changing subjects here is your denying mind eminbozo, and that sad state we're all quite aware of, thank you very much. I present anatomical proof why Patty's real, to anyone smart enough to read and decide, you merely spam and babble 24/7. Now tell me sincerely, which tactic do you think is working best? lol
reclaimerReclaimer 2 months ago
Dodge #437 komododiot aka reclaimer
Why are you babblin' about 7 feet? What does that have to do with Ken Peterson or claim that I wanted a recreation?
Still waiting, you geek. Quit trying to change the subject: it won't work.
eminboztepe 2 months ago
No one's lying more than you eminaidiot, so why don't you just give up the charade it's beyond sad by now. Patty's proven 7ft and not a damn thing you can do about it, she's estimated to be that already in Green's 1968 book. You have also been presented with anatomical proof, why your friend BobH's the lousiest candidate you could probably pick. There's not one single thing on Patty, that fits with him or any other person for that matter. It's called anatomy, the word and meaning you don't like.
reclaimerReclaimer 2 months ago
So you're basically wrong on just about everything you say, and yet you say no one as of yet can refute any of the "facts" in your video? Priceless. So our two options are - to go with your opinions, or to listen & go with the opinions of highly credible scientists instead. That's a tough one....gonna have to think about it for awhile.
bobbybittmanrocks 2 months ago
@bobbybittmanrocks
No, I am basically "wrong" on facts that YOU claim I made.
Show me wher I ever said that Al DeAtley was at Bluff Creek the day it was shot. You can't, because I never did. The film was MAILED TO Al for him to get it developed.
You're pathetic.
eminboztepe 2 months ago
- as well as a description of Bluff Creek that doesn't match the PGF, said the PGF has been edited, but Bill Munns examined a 1st generation copy of the film from Patricia Patterson, and he said it wasn't edited, said scientists aren't as knowledgable as you because you wore costumes before, and no scientists believe the PGF is real.
bobbybittmanrocks 2 months ago
@bobbybittmanrocks
1. Yes, the PGF has been edited. It's called "splicing" genius. John Green's "first generation copy" has the tent pole trees reversed. Duh.
2. Bill Munn's copy is the same as John Green's: 1st generation copy that has frames flipped.
3. Even the bigfooters admit this. Yet you can't. Hmmmm.
4. Scientists like Krantz is dead. All you have is Meldrum, the same goofball that initially claimed the Snow Walker footage was unquestionably legit.
Enough said.
eminboztepe 2 months ago
You can't be serious eminboztepe. You made a video centered around a Star Trek mask, said DeAtley was at Bluff Creek the day the film was shot, said DNA evidence doesn't exist in the face of the Ketchum report being released, said Bob H is the guy in the suit, even though he gave 2 completely different descriptions of the suit -
bobbybittmanrocks 2 months ago
@bobbybittmanrocks
Wrong as always. I never said that Al DeAtley was at the Bluff Creek the day it was shot.
See? You're lying. What else can I say?
eminboztepe 2 months ago
3:10 , i believe these guy hasn't seen a human foot untouched by shoes!!!
tala12 2 months ago
Dr. Melba Ketchum update: When we started this, I thought we'd be finished in a few weeks, but instead as Sasquatch are known to do, they threw us curve balls even with their DNA which can be as elusive as they are.we are past that!As a result, we have assembled a renowned team, to make this project "extraordinary". If everyone will hang in there, I promise it will be worth the wait. We have the proof, now just give us the opportunity to present it in a form that will even convince skeptics.
rockstarzep 2 months ago
It's real. I believe the Freeman footage is real, too.
MrJaffa2015 2 months ago
Dodge #417 komodidiot aka reclaimer
Ken Peterson/ I wanted a recreation?
Hmmmm?
eminboztepe 2 months ago
More of your insane spam, eh eminbozo. Get used to the idea you religious freak; Bigfoots really live out there in nature, not a damn thing you can do about it. Denial won't change that.
reclaimerReclaimer 2 months ago
She's fake thanks!
eminboztepe 3 months ago
shes real thanks !
UFOvideoEXPERT 3 months ago
Dodge #412 komododiot aka reclaimer
Ken Peterson? I wanted a recreation?
Geek.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
No Double we should view bigfoot as imaginary because there's no proof of it whatsoever.
seymourbbest 3 months ago
Exactly right, well put. Folks need to get over this monster nonsense. This is obviously not a monster, or all the witnesses wouldn't live to tell about it, but a shy humanlike primate. Perhaps even eventually classified as human, my money's on that outcome anyway. Therein also lies the likely explanation for no interest in the subject, from mainstream science and governments. There's never been any (official) government backed expedition looking into it, despite a whole nation's big interest.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
I never knew about it being a "her" until I watched Finding Bigfoot on Animal Planet.So cool you can see her breasts moving.That solidified its existence for me.I just dont understand how humans think we know everything about this planet and dismiss the possiblity of new species.We're naive.We should view bigfoot as an animal not a paranormal monster.
doublemcnasty 3 months ago
The other day on "finding bigfoot" moneymaker said bigfoot can't be photographed or captured. but he didn't explain the reasoning for either one. Convienent huh?
seymourbbest 3 months ago
"They are seen all the time" and yet, even in this day and age with video phones and cameras, no one can get a clear photo or video. LOL
The Patty geeks crack me up!
eminboztepe 3 months ago
@eminboztepe They're rare. They may even be extinct now. Scientists predict that only a few thousand exist. And what if somebody saw and took a picture with a cell phone or shot some video? It would be dismissed. The thing that makes the patterson footage unique is that it was made at a time where aside from somebody walking around in a suit it was impossible to fake.
Luigi84289 2 months ago
@Luigi84289
It's a man in a suit. See my youtube video for details. No one to date has been able to refute ANY of the points made in it.
eminboztepe 2 months ago
@calimar28 it's yo old lady runnig loose bitch
iWannaGiveItAllTaYou 3 months ago
Yep Keywest--- dr jeff meldrum will sell you a foot print casting of an "authentic" bigfoot for 50 bucks. 60 bucks if you want it autographed by him.
seymourbbest 3 months ago
Wrong. They're seen all the time.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
Notice the peoples obsession with footprint casts--the only thing they have. also notice that they are selling something. all these creatures running all over the place--multiple states and on vancouver island leaving thousands of prints but never seen or found, Children big feet--whole families--but nothing but casts of prints that were made for them to find.. footprints imply something was there but nothing can be found so people expand endlessly on their minds science of the prints..
KeyWestBluesX 3 months ago
@KeyWestBluesX Uh they're seen all the time retard.Big mysterious feet in the middle of the woods wouldn't keep a centuries old legend going.You're ignorant of all the evidence because like a child you've jumped to a conclusion without doing any research
wisewarriormuzic 1 month ago
@1:50 to 1:56 also
rockstarzep 3 months ago
@1:35 to 1:41 also
rockstarzep 3 months ago
@2:02 to 2:19 sums up the situation
rockstarzep 3 months ago
Dodge #399 komodidiot
If you don't know who Ken Peterson is, why did you say he was probably a costume expert?
Caught you again babblin', didn't I?
Geek,
eminboztepe 3 months ago
Doesn't keep you from babbling about it either, does it. And retroller, too bad it's only your kind making up crap so you have crap to post.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
Yeah Munns and meldrum and all these Bigfooters avoid the bottom line on bigfoot----theres not a speck of scientific evidence for bigfoot. But that don't keep their gums from flapping.
seymourbbest 3 months ago
Another TV show to "prove" Bigfoot? Wow how many is that now over the years ? 400? 600? A TV show isn't proof of anything but your gullibility.
seymourbbest 3 months ago
I don't know who Ken is, you brough him up you utter emogeekess. lmao Yep retroll, you're in for a big embarrassing surprise. lol It already is fact of course, many of us know that, you unfortunately not one of them. But you will be in good time, rest assured. The shape and colour, retroll? What about it. Typical BF physique. There is absolutely no way this is a suit, no freaking possibility. At all. Never been debunked, on the contrary found real, so the BobHoax fiasco's for the easily fooled.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
@reclaimerReclaimer Bob can try to prove his case with grilling and science and reinactment ANY time that he wishes. Oh, but he has that lie detector test where he looks absolutely scared to death which proves everything. He should come on Animal Planet to prove his case after they prove him wrong on Sunday night 9 pm EST.
rockstarzep 3 months ago
Dodge #394 komodidiot
Ken Peterson? You said he was costume expert? Prove it.
Geek.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
@eminboztepe no but phillip morris and his wife were--and both confirmed the building of the suit in NC and selling it to RP who then did various modifications MANY people confessed including the 26 year old athlete in the suit who got screwed out of his payoff..Wilson who faked the prints in the area also confessed--but he had nothing to do with the rp film and felt sorry for him because of the cancer. All interviews with people describe RP as con man, liar and showboater desperate for money
KeyWestBluesX 3 months ago
@KeyWestBluesX
The suit didn't come from Morris. Morris made Halloween costumes. The suit in the film was from Hollywood. Roger knew Janos Prohaska through Corriganville. Roger even bought some of Corrigan's gorilla costumes when Corriganville was being liquidated (and sold to Bob Hope). Roger may have contacted Morris, but he didn't use his suit. The headpiece came from Wah Chang (associate of Prohaska). See my youtube video for details.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
Are you geeks still on about her feet on a blurry YT upload, are you for real? lol Again, why do you deniers think it's called a Bigfoot. Duh. Kinda known for having big humanlike feet, I'd say. Merry Ken, eminaidiot, we know you're lonely enough.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
watch @1:28 to 1:34 a few dozen times and then say that it's a man in a suit. By the way, @1:49, the toes are seen on enhanced photography such as in Meldrum's book. Unless he is a fraud, then you can take the "he's wearing slippers" argument off the table. Aside from the muscle herniation, muscle shock upon stepdown, and muscle density seen in this video, you can see the face muscles move rapidly in the gait analysis video @2:56 and @2:57. I can even see the face fairly clearly @2:57.
rockstarzep 3 months ago
Dodge #375 komodoidiot
Ken Peterson a costume expert? I wanted a recreation?
Hmmm?
Geek.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
Monster geekess eminaidiot keeps lying through the remaining pearlies, at least we have it in black and white to prove the one who mentioned any Ken whoever is eminaidiot. Damn she's dumb. lol Posters don't get banned for trolling eminaidiot, were that the case you'de not be here would you, ha. Get your facts straight, difficult I guess with all you 24/ account business.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
Take your stinking paws off me, you damn dirty she-ape!
HaligonianType1 3 months ago
Dodge #358 komodoidiot
You said Ken Peterson was a costume expert. Your claim, not mine.
Back it up, you geek! lol
eminboztepe 3 months ago
We don't care about Ken. You silly geekess, eminaidiot.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
Dodge #311 komodidiot
Ken Peterson a costume expert? I wanted a recreation?
Back up you babblin' you Geek.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
Huh? Your excuses are going nowhere. Nobody knows or cares what you're babbling about, eminaidiot.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
Dodge #310 komodidiot aka reclaimer
Ken Peterson a costume expert? I wanted a recreation?
Geek.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
Somebody surely is saving that address for a rainy day, idiot, you won't even know it... What a wanker... lol
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
komo the clown gutless as ever ive post my address for the rich tart to come say it to my face...danish moron..
nastymonsters2 3 months ago
And eminaidiot's so dumb she thinks that's not possible on a computer, she's the most clueless geek ever on YT. Now go blow yourself nastyfart31, you ugly tart...
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
@reclaimerReclaimer lmao, wow your name again? do you just go around insulting people? You need to get a life troll lmao.
evilyakko 3 months ago
@evilyakko Troll? lmao I have a genuine interest and only insult back insulting assholes, looks to me like you're the troll. Now beat it, wanker.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
@reclaimerReclaimer LMAO and you call me a geek? you have a "genuine interest" in bigfoot? damn, you need to get laid dude.
evilyakko 3 months ago
@evilyakko As a matter of fact I do, in five minutes more precisely, haha. I'd say someone trolling Bigfoot videos without a genuine interest, is the major geek here. Shit, you're more clueless than two dried up pieces of snake vomit. lol
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
@evilyakko
Reclaimer aka komodidiot lives with his mom. He is unemployed; he can't find a job. His other account was banned for trolling. HE is the geek.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
Wow, look at that Nasty.....we posted within seconds of each other.
But we are the same person, right? LOL
Komodoidiot is such a geeeeeeeeeeeeeek!
eminboztepe 3 months ago
Dodge #302 komoodidiot
Back up your claims you geek..
And speaking of multiple accounts, didn't your last one get BANNED for babblin'? LOL
eminboztepe 3 months ago
eminaidiot and all her fake YT accounts, it's a wonder she can keep track of them all, I see she still prefers the blind speller act for one of them. lmao
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
@reclaimerReclaimer told u fag i have one account ,,i also told u my address to say it to my face..31 caughall road upton chester...you dickless paedo...as ive told you ill snap you jaw off you total troll
nastymonsters2 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dodge #298 komodidiot aka reclaimer
Don't get mad at me because you can't back up your babblin' bullshit, LOL.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
Haha, what a sore loser that eminaidiot. Spending her entire scared life on YT talking about suits, how sad can it be to convince one self like that. lol
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
@reclaimerReclaimer u stupid cunt you spent all your time here thts why you got banned for trolling and copyright infringment komo the paedo ...you ducmb fuck
nastymonsters2 3 months ago
@nastymonsters2 Get lost, sicko troll. Bigfoot's real, you're not, haha.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
@reclaimerReclaimer too my face told you komo fag ill rip your spine out..you gutless faggot..keep typing im emin ...fact is gay boy im not never have been...one account cunt face ...gave you my address countless times fact is your a fag rent boy queer cocksmoking gutless troll who never leaves the shit hole you call home,,31 cuaghall road upton chester..ill put you in a body bag and do the world a favor .you brain dead moron...
nastymonsters2 3 months ago
@reclaimerReclaimer all your life dickhead thts why you got banned for trolling you dumb fuck...
nastymonsters2 3 months ago
Dodge 284 komodidiot aka reclaimer.
A recreation? Ken Peterson a costume expert?
I'm still waiting for you to back up your babblin' bullshit. Geek.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
Yeah, well done retroll. Plenty of evidence, tracks are evidence. In the places these guys reside bones don't preserve well, yes, that is just fact. Footprints don't last a long time, unless you cast them first.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
Wrong. The name was merely invented then, before that it was Hairy Man, Old Man, etc. These sightings go back centuries and yet modern deniers still doubt and deny, we're talking detailed descriptions of a primate being, not a white bewinged horse with a spiraling horn.
reclaimerReclaimer 3 months ago
Bes---evolution can be seen in fossils. The animal we know as the horse has its evolutionary changes very well documented by fossil records. Bigfoot is an invention from the 1950s.
seymourbbest 3 months ago
We know your legend's reaaaallll
h3ttylotjustice4all 4 months ago
There are new animals being discovered everyday. Scientist have discovered a new species of the dog family that has been living in Texas and Mexico, and was just recently discovered. People believe in the theory of evolution just based on the speculations of scientist, with no actual proof, and yet they disbelieve the possibility of an undiscovered species living in the remote parts of the world?
bes101772 4 months ago
I'm not joking. Hehe...
reclaimerReclaimer 4 months ago
No, that'd more likely be troll slaves retroll...
reclaimerReclaimer 4 months ago
@reclaimerReclaimer lol
DaOriginalTrollking 4 months ago
Okay this may be a little weird but um....i got a boner from the breast zoom in...............
DaOriginalTrollking 4 months ago
holy shit!!! homosapien its homosapien.Evolution and its accompanying necessity of long ages of evolutionary development would be hard pressed to accommodate a living homosapien
1billion1deaths1 4 months ago in playlist cryptozoology/unexplained phenomena
Any month will do for me, retro. Who really cares about the year or the dates, important thing is getting it on camera and that's going to happen more frequently from now on - not less.
reclaimerReclaimer 4 months ago
I don't think so, retroll. It's way closer now than you could even imagine, haha.
reclaimerReclaimer 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Come on! I answered "B" first! You're all just glomming onto my answer. I want my major award!
seymourbbest 4 months ago
Wrong horse...
reclaimerReclaimer 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's DODGE# 164, komodidiot aka reclaimer
Show me where I said I wanted a recreation, and name me a cartoonist that is a costume expert.
Quit dodgin' by babblin' bullshit and back up your claims.
Geek. lol
eminboztepe 5 months ago
Well, you're notoriously gullible so you might as well ask Donald Duck. There's zero resemblance to anything ever created in Hollywood, and they usually strive for realism, but do show us a movie BF looking like this. You'll have a hard time finding one, hence, your silence. The fluffy undefined movie suits all look the only way the can, which is anatomically human and the very opposite of the reported primate-like descriptions. This info you'll ignore, we know, it speaks volumes that you do.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Is the answer "B"! Did I win!!!
seymourbbest 5 months ago
Let's apply Occam's Razor here. Which is more likely:
A) Roger, a well known hoaxer and conman who had Hollywood FX connections, a man no stranger to showbiz, conveniently films a real bigfoot after his movie fails. This bigfoot, filmed in the 60's, has 60's costume characteristics and its face perfectly matches a headpiece of that time period originally worn by a co-worker of Roger and made by a F/X man he knew.
or
B) It's man in a suit.
Hmmm....the answer is obvious.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
@OregonCheetah3
Actually, I am. Scientists are not qualified to determine what a suit is and what isn't. Nuff said.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bindernagel is doomed to suffer the same fate as krantz---go to his grave still babbling about an imaginary monster roaming the USA.
seymourbbest 5 months ago
The guy who wore the suit already came out and confessed a while ago. As well as the person who sold the suit to Patterson weeks before the footage was shot.
AfterDarkComedyClub 5 months ago in playlist More videos from YummyDVD
@AfterDarkComedyClub Came out of the closet? Both of them
rockstarzep 5 months ago
@rockstarzep maybe that too lol
AfterDarkComedyClub 5 months ago
They're primates and females ought to exist too. The witness drawing in that book bears no resemblance to Patty.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
Nah, go ahead retro and try copy that figure on the ridge... I'd love to see how you're gonna pull it off, with those arms working naturally from the shoulders 8ft up...
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
@retrobloke78
LOL!. Good points! And a book with FEMALE bigfoots at that. Some people are sooooo gullible.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
I love how Patty really fooled so many, to think she's supposed to be a bad Hollywood costume. Something never proven, so flimsy rumors are swung together with no regards to sighting reports over time. One of these things got caught on camera, and gullibility abounds.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
Let's apply Occam's Razor here. Which is more likely:
A) Roger, a well known hoaxer and conman who had Hollywood FX connections, a man no stranger to showbiz, conveniently films a real bigfoot after his movie fails. This bigfoot, filmed in the 60's, has 60's costume characteristics and its face perfectly matches a headpiece of that time period originally worn by a co-worker of Roger and made by a F/X man he knew.
or
B) It's man in a suit.
Hmmm....the answer is obvious.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
For the RESEARCHERS- it's all practical jokes, false science, hoaxes, imagination, and misinterpretation. My faith is in the word of the DOUBTERS' stories, imagination, refusal of science, misinterpretation, and contradictions.
rockstarzep 5 months ago
still a suit you trolls...
nastymonsters2 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey Retro didn't you know even a blob from 1000 yds away or blobs on infrared or night vison are also bigfoot? Even innocent pics of the woods and old home movies are full of bigfoot. We didn't know it at the time but post production analyzation has found all kinds of the sneaky creatures. Might even be one hiding in the words of this comment from me.
seymourbbest 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No one is talking to you, you geek.
And that's DODGE# 152, komodidiot
Show me where I said I wanted a recreation, and name me a cartoonist that is a costume expert.
Back up your claims you geek.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
You, yeah.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
Clearly a female costume.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
Clearly a female.
TheCanadianShield 5 months ago
PGF, Freeman, Marble Mountain, all three the real thing. Real Sasquatches, luckily it's only drooling lifeless trolls left dumb enough to doubt this.
reclaimerReclaimer 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@reclaimerReclaimer aka komodidiot
That's DODGE# 145, komodidiot
Show me where I said I wanted a recreation, and name me a cartoonist that is a costume expert.
Quit dodgin' by babblin' bullshit and back up your claims.
Geek. lol
eminboztepe 5 months ago
No. There is no footage of a real bigfoot anywhere. Because bigfoot isn't real. They don't exist and never have.
seymourbbest 5 months ago
@seymourbbest Lol you crack me up...ignorant poor little person
Robomatic1000 5 months ago 4
Is this footage of a real Bigfoot?
NationOfMasturbation 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DODGE# 134, komodidiot
Show me where I said I wanted a recreation, and name me a cartoonist that is a costume expert.
Back up your babblin' bullshit claims, you geek.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
Yeah retro I've heard bigfoot even knows when we talk about it. Best be careful.
seymourbbest 5 months ago
Heh, nice eminbozo...no arguments as usual. Obviously not, in the light of even the most ordinary explanation regarding BobHat's limited physique, you can't refute any of these anatomical facts if the subject's only 6ft...and the legs supposed to be his. Facts, both visibly on screen and facts of then-f/x and facts of...wait for it...anatomy. You know, good old facts, evidence, proof. Oh, you'll call on fluffy Barney of course, only to make it all the more clear for us how wrong you are. :)
komodoman 5 months ago
@retrobloke78
Exactly, retrobloke. Exactly. Komodoidiot is quite the moron. :)
eminboztepe 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's DODGE# 125, komodidiot
Show me where I said I wanted a recreation, and name me a cartoonist that is a costume expert.
Quit dodgin' by babblin' bullshit and back up your claims.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
Even their legs don't match up, so there you go... Each and every bone, arm or leg, none fit a human's... The proportions are all off, and padding won't solve it when a guy inside couldn't reach to operate any of it. And 1 9 6 7, wake up... lol So a mere 6ft only, on account alone of her legs being fully visible, is not possible as her height and therefore it certainly can't be BobH the Bullshitter. Can't be any other human either, instead leaving above the 7ft range as a very realistic guess.
komodoman 5 months ago
eminaidiot's now resorted back to jokes of Barney and such jive, it's her only means of argument left in the light of defeat. lol She knows the point of anatomy's crucial, and just below the surface even our hoax stubbornness herself knows it's no longer serious to claim it's fake, but won't budge an inch. Better go on than lose face, eh emina? ;) It's been successfully proven to be real, BobH's short torso alone did that for us, otherwise it'd be taller than 6ft since her legs are in full view.
komodoman 5 months ago
@retrobloke78
Komodidiot would say so, LOL!
eminboztepe 5 months ago
@retrobloke78
Me too. I heard rocks hitting the top of my cabin. Only logical explanation is that it must be a bigfoot.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
My cousin just came across a crazy footprint inn north GA and they had something make knocking sounds that night
andrewupsidedown 5 months ago