Added: 4 years ago
From: getexpelled
Views: 2,385
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • love dosn't exist, at least not in the sense you think it does.

    it's (in laments) psychological trickery to allow for the conceiving and rearing for a child to accrue.

  • Do some scientists not understand that people have their own experiences? If one has never loved, do not say love does not exist.

  • Yes, there should be real intermediate stage fossils, and if someone has found them, it appears theyre keeping them stored like baseball cards, while waiting for their value to increase.

  • Oh, and creationism isn't true, no evidence to back it up.

  • but you believe what you want to believe understanding that until you get evidence that all that creationism is, a belief.

  • So in other words the notion that everything just exploded into existence without reason or purpose isn't a belief?

  • three things:

    1) it isn't a belief; it is an idea

    2) it isn't an explosion, but a rapid expansion, the big bang phrase was coined as actually an insult to the theory, to belittle its significance, but it is a common misconception.

    and 3) who says that the expansion wasn't without purpose? you can make an argument that the expansion was a kick start, and it was started by god, or shiva, or allah. whomever you believe is the divine creator of the universe.

  • i think that this is a commonly accepted stereotype, scientists are athiests, god-hating, evil, non-religious athiests, which isn't true. What? You may be asking to yourself. In fact 40% of all scientists believe in a god/gods, and i think that it is actually the non-scientist athiests who shout at religous peoples scientific theories with a athiest undertone that has caused a backlash by most non-scientist, and a misunderstanding of religion and science outside of science.

  • "science leads to killing people" lmao

  • your fucking lost people

  • nice editing on the dawkins clip there buddy

  • i belive in id. my dumbass friends think we evolved from monkeys. i asked y r there still monkeys on earth. they were silent.

  • we didnt evolve from monkeys...monkeys and humans evolved from a common ancestor...humans branched off one way and monkeys branched off another...back then there were no monkeys and no humans...

    before you call your friends dumbasses (why are they your friends if they are) acquire the knowledge needed to make such a statement

  • dude i know my friends aren't dumbasses it only the ones that believe in that garbage evolution the rest believe that we were created by god. i belive the same thing but i just say higher being. but they get the idea. dude we were created not evolved tell me if u think ur so smart wat was this "common ancester" evolution is as fake as global warming. disclamer i believe in natural climate change not global warming.

  • Australopithecus africanus was an early hominid, an australopithecine, who lived between 2-3 million years ago in the Pliocene. In common with the older Australopithecus afarensis, A. africanus was slenderly built, or gracile, and was thought to have been a direct ancestor of modern humans.

    does this mean im smart ?? :D

  • rolls eyes. i can c that u copy pasted this most likely from wikipedia. besides i know it's a theory not fact. so i'm sticking to my guns.

  • also...ur a complete idiot if u believe global warming to be a hoax...natural climate change does have something to do with it, but global warming has made this change occur faster and become more severe

  • it is. dude al gore is a fat lying pig. he exadurates everything. practicly every scientist debunked global warming. al gore shouldn't get any attention. he's like al sharpton talks about nothing but garbage and hot air. the only thing al gore has that al sharpton doesn't have is a real job.

  • al gore didnt come up with the idea of global warming, and how did he come up in this conversation....the creation myth is also a theory and not a fact

  • that is true. but i believe wat i believe and u the same.

  • very mature of you to say that...kudos...lets leave it at that

  • Scientists aren't allowed to think creationist thoughts? Are we in some twilight zone where we are characters in George Orwell's 1984? This kind of broad, sweeping, and mostly untrue statement is typical of bad logic, and is a style that simply tries to appeal to your emotions without regard for actuality. Ben Stein must be much stupider than I thought.

  • In a lot of oppressive places people can think whatever they want.

  • "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism" "neo-darwinian materialism"

  • evolution is the worlds biggest fraud

  • Yeah, that's pretty close to it!

  • THOSE WHO RATED THESE COMMENTS BAD. Your itiots, I want to know how smart it makes you to beleive in such a thing that says life and planets and all of our DNA codes and just the position of the earth to make it always a liveable temperature, CAME FROM A SPEC OF LINT. AND YOU THINK CREATIONISM SOUNDS LIKE A FAIRYTALE!

  • "On April 9th, a cease-and-desist letter was sent to the producers of Expelled, alleging that it infringed on the copyright of XVIVO's The Inner Life of the Cell animation:"

    ID supporters are too stupid to figure out copyright laws. whodathunkit

  • O' so it's ok to embrace al gore's movie but this o' no no no no that is not acceptable. I will go to see this.

  • YEp Im definitely watching this movie, I also never bought it, it just has so much GAAAAPS. 'course Darwinists have someething to HIDE.

  • I'll be sure to check it out Ben Stein is the man! and yes I am one of those old school dinosaurs who has never bought into Darwins concepts.

  • this is a funny movie. good thing its not reel.

  • actually...you would be surprised at how little creationism is taught as a theory. Many schools teach only the theory of evolution. I went to four different schools from 6th grade to Graduation. Three of talked Darwin, and virtually nada Creation. The other (a Christian school) taught more or less ID, but what do you expect? The argument is that state run schools should give resources for both cases, and frequently they neglect the ID point of view.

  • Yay! Creationist propaganda!

    I can't wait for the mindless drones of the creationist movement to start citing this movie alongside Kent Hovind in their bullshit arguments.

  • cant wait! great topic!

  • Propaganda

  • Propaganda. Your plot has been explosed for the fraud that it is. cdesign proponentsists, cdesign proponentsists, cdesign proponentsists, cdesign proponentsists, cdesign proponentsists, cdesign proponentsists, cdesign proponentsists, cdesign proponentsists

  • Sure you can question Darwinism, as long as your offering a REAL alternative to it, i.e. one that is backed up with actual verifiable evidence. But thanks for posting the video though, its always illuminating to hear different thoughts on the issue.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more