Belive it or not Free energy is real,But the powerfull Oil business won't alow common ppl to know this,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the revolution!
I've been reading and watching a few videos about this Bedini Motor malarky. I see many of the people involved making the claim that they are not over unity. Presumably in an attempt to make it sound more plausible.
But if this system can keep a motor running (and therefore has to spend energy to overcome friction) *and* recharge the battery (which even has to be protected from overcharging), then that is exactly what it is! The system produces more energy than is put in, ergo: over unity.
@CaptainChaos Over unity idea is wack...on your part. True, you can't get more energy out of a set amount of energy, you can only convert it to another form of energy, Don't get me wrong, this looks like the same ole scam BS, but people who say its impossible to create a system that produces more energy than used are idiots aswell, trying to sound smart. WTF do you think a solar pannel is? The way a device can produce more energy than used it to tap into an energy already present outside the sys
@CaptainChaos ....tem. Example being a solar pannel, though the only energy you need to put in is to build it, from there it converts a free energy source(free to us...we didn't have to build the sun, no energy loss on our part) into an electrical output. Scientists don't have it all figured out, we can only study less than 10% of what makes our reality, so to say its immpossible to go against rules they set is ridiculas. If you never try, you never discover. All said, this looks like a scam.
@cheeto165 You're confused. A solar panel doesn't "produce more energy than it uses". Why would you think that? Solar cells are famously inefficient, they convert only up to about 15% of the solar energy that hits them to electricity. Did you forget that the solar rays absorbed by the cell count as "energy used"?
These are fundamental laws of physics that are extremely well understood and thoroughly tested. I think the idiots are the people who keep insisting that they're wrong...
@CaptainChaos yes it does, a solar panel dosen't use energy. It converts sunlight(energy) into eletrical. I know about the conservation of energy thank you. The sun is free energy, renewable energy. We don't put that energy in, so yes, to us it is free. You don't pump enegy into the solar panel so it can absord photons, and your wrong about the efficientcy also, we can now convert the infrared spectrum into electrical also, and are in the process of combinding the two, so what where you saying?
@cheeto165 Saying that it just "converts" energy doesn't mean anything. Every machine converts energy, and it does so by "using" one kind of energy and producing another kind. A petrol engine, for instance, converts chemical energy into mechanical energy, but you wouldn't say it doesn't "use" fuel, would you? A solar panel uses solar energy and produces less electrical energy. It is therefore not the example of over unity you claimed. I don't think you understand what "over unity" really means..
@CaptainChaos dude, your trying to argue to hard, think about waht im saying. "YOU" don't have to put energy in, you don't start up the sun so you can harness its energy. I didn't say it was over unity aswell, you must have missed the part where i claim i know what conservation of energy is, and that the law cannot be broken. And i know solar energy is energy, and yes i know of chemical energy, potentual energy, thermal energy, electrical energy, as yes...over unity. Just forget i said anything.
@cheeto165 thats funny, I use a hydrogen generator to fuel a lawnmower engine, it turns a permanent magnet alternator, I get 2kilowatt out of the alternator and only use 75 watts to power the hho generator. I don't claim over unity or conservation of energy, I just get free power out of water, the only power I need is to start the whole process.
@Me102288 i'm sure you don't claim conservation of energy, why would you...it would only make sense. i'm sure you do acheive over unity in your mind. sadly in reality, being proved right countless times, the only thing your doing is charging up water moecules with enough energy to seperate from their covalent bond, the only energy you get when combusting is the enegy released from the H & O atoms as they bond and shed two electrons worth of energy, the exact amount needed to break the bond.
@cheeto165 well, I dont believe much either, so I tried the hho thing.. Alreadt know how elecrolysis worked so I gave it a shot I guess its not that hard when ya actually see it Was pretty neat, its called a permanent magnet alternator. at only 500 rpm these lil thing put out a lot of electriciy. Might want to look up marine grade alternators. I don't believe some law based on the technology they had 100 years ago is still even remotely correct. Well we all know we learn something new every day
Forgive me for the stupid question, I'm not an electrical engineer, but what is the point of this? Is it not just a very elaborate (and inefficient) way to charge the second battery using the first one?
Well, even if you do not have a charging battery, the collapsing magnetic field in the coil should still kick back into the primary battery, thus recharge the primary. I'm running my motor with no charging battery for a day now and detect no change in battery Maybe it's slow but we'll see how long it last, if at all.
actually, it won't kick back unless it has a capacitor. I tried the capacitor but it self resonance and causing short circuit. However, I did engineer the circuit so that it self recharge when the magnetic field collapse. I'm crossing my fingers cuz i'm start building the circuit tomorrow. If only people can double check my circuit.
The area I don't agree with is your mention of plus charges. There are no plus charges in electricity. It is all negative electron flow. So what I see you doing is creating the high voltage spike that occurs when the magnetic field collapses from an energized coil, but this is negative electron flow.
Hey man, thanks to you I havent slept in three days! Thanks a lot!:) I hit radiant last night, and have made amazing leaps forward with all of my other research on this. Listen, go read bedinis stubblefield stuff, it will make perfect sense now. Amazing and thanks again!!!
Thats the smartest thing I have ever seen with the bedini. You are right on, and very smart for showing it this way! Thanks so much for all of your help!
You might find it an interesting experiment to measure the voltage on both sides of the diode going to the charging battery.. The Bedini is addicting stuff :) Thank you for sharing.
Have you tried using a Roding coil?
Would be interesting to see if there is any change.
2BSovereign 7 months ago
seems awefull coplicated way to save power :-o
Me102288 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Belive it or not Free energy is real,But the powerfull Oil business won't alow common ppl to know this,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the revolution!
jjerkings2890 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here! The Oil companies are doing everything in their power to stop these
information. If you want a Free energy machine do a search in youtube for the LT MAGNET MOTOR , Join the
revolution!
polysemousncrk 1 year ago
I've been reading and watching a few videos about this Bedini Motor malarky. I see many of the people involved making the claim that they are not over unity. Presumably in an attempt to make it sound more plausible.
But if this system can keep a motor running (and therefore has to spend energy to overcome friction) *and* recharge the battery (which even has to be protected from overcharging), then that is exactly what it is! The system produces more energy than is put in, ergo: over unity.
CaptainChaos 1 year ago
@CaptainChaos Over unity idea is wack...on your part. True, you can't get more energy out of a set amount of energy, you can only convert it to another form of energy, Don't get me wrong, this looks like the same ole scam BS, but people who say its impossible to create a system that produces more energy than used are idiots aswell, trying to sound smart. WTF do you think a solar pannel is? The way a device can produce more energy than used it to tap into an energy already present outside the sys
cheeto165 1 year ago
@CaptainChaos ....tem. Example being a solar pannel, though the only energy you need to put in is to build it, from there it converts a free energy source(free to us...we didn't have to build the sun, no energy loss on our part) into an electrical output. Scientists don't have it all figured out, we can only study less than 10% of what makes our reality, so to say its immpossible to go against rules they set is ridiculas. If you never try, you never discover. All said, this looks like a scam.
cheeto165 1 year ago
@cheeto165 You're confused. A solar panel doesn't "produce more energy than it uses". Why would you think that? Solar cells are famously inefficient, they convert only up to about 15% of the solar energy that hits them to electricity. Did you forget that the solar rays absorbed by the cell count as "energy used"?
These are fundamental laws of physics that are extremely well understood and thoroughly tested. I think the idiots are the people who keep insisting that they're wrong...
CaptainChaos 1 year ago
@CaptainChaos yes it does, a solar panel dosen't use energy. It converts sunlight(energy) into eletrical. I know about the conservation of energy thank you. The sun is free energy, renewable energy. We don't put that energy in, so yes, to us it is free. You don't pump enegy into the solar panel so it can absord photons, and your wrong about the efficientcy also, we can now convert the infrared spectrum into electrical also, and are in the process of combinding the two, so what where you saying?
cheeto165 1 year ago
@cheeto165 Saying that it just "converts" energy doesn't mean anything. Every machine converts energy, and it does so by "using" one kind of energy and producing another kind. A petrol engine, for instance, converts chemical energy into mechanical energy, but you wouldn't say it doesn't "use" fuel, would you? A solar panel uses solar energy and produces less electrical energy. It is therefore not the example of over unity you claimed. I don't think you understand what "over unity" really means..
CaptainChaos 1 year ago
@CaptainChaos dude, your trying to argue to hard, think about waht im saying. "YOU" don't have to put energy in, you don't start up the sun so you can harness its energy. I didn't say it was over unity aswell, you must have missed the part where i claim i know what conservation of energy is, and that the law cannot be broken. And i know solar energy is energy, and yes i know of chemical energy, potentual energy, thermal energy, electrical energy, as yes...over unity. Just forget i said anything.
cheeto165 1 year ago
@cheeto165 Yeah, I think that's probably best... ;-)
CaptainChaos 1 year ago
@cheeto165 thats funny, I use a hydrogen generator to fuel a lawnmower engine, it turns a permanent magnet alternator, I get 2kilowatt out of the alternator and only use 75 watts to power the hho generator. I don't claim over unity or conservation of energy, I just get free power out of water, the only power I need is to start the whole process.
Me102288 11 months ago
@Me102288 i'm sure you don't claim conservation of energy, why would you...it would only make sense. i'm sure you do acheive over unity in your mind. sadly in reality, being proved right countless times, the only thing your doing is charging up water moecules with enough energy to seperate from their covalent bond, the only energy you get when combusting is the enegy released from the H & O atoms as they bond and shed two electrons worth of energy, the exact amount needed to break the bond.
cheeto165 11 months ago
@cheeto165 well, I dont believe much either, so I tried the hho thing.. Alreadt know how elecrolysis worked so I gave it a shot I guess its not that hard when ya actually see it Was pretty neat, its called a permanent magnet alternator. at only 500 rpm these lil thing put out a lot of electriciy. Might want to look up marine grade alternators. I don't believe some law based on the technology they had 100 years ago is still even remotely correct. Well we all know we learn something new every day
Me102288 11 months ago
@Me102288 you don''t need fake science, things are getting really crazy right now in science, just visit sciencedaily and read some articles.
cheeto165 11 months ago
Forgive me for the stupid question, I'm not an electrical engineer, but what is the point of this? Is it not just a very elaborate (and inefficient) way to charge the second battery using the first one?
CaptainChaos 1 year ago
Well, even if you do not have a charging battery, the collapsing magnetic field in the coil should still kick back into the primary battery, thus recharge the primary. I'm running my motor with no charging battery for a day now and detect no change in battery Maybe it's slow but we'll see how long it last, if at all.
Good vid
vietarc 2 years ago
good on ya, let us know the outcome
breakthemachine 2 years ago
actually, it won't kick back unless it has a capacitor. I tried the capacitor but it self resonance and causing short circuit. However, I did engineer the circuit so that it self recharge when the magnetic field collapse. I'm crossing my fingers cuz i'm start building the circuit tomorrow. If only people can double check my circuit.
vietarc 2 years ago
Excellent demonstration.
The area I don't agree with is your mention of plus charges. There are no plus charges in electricity. It is all negative electron flow. So what I see you doing is creating the high voltage spike that occurs when the magnetic field collapses from an energized coil, but this is negative electron flow.
maylady10 3 years ago
@maylady10 there is always positive flow. The protons have positive charge, the electrons negative charge. They flow in opposite directions.
cheeto165 11 months ago
Clear and intuitive. Thanks. :)
awells88 3 years ago
Hey man, thanks to you I havent slept in three days! Thanks a lot!:) I hit radiant last night, and have made amazing leaps forward with all of my other research on this. Listen, go read bedinis stubblefield stuff, it will make perfect sense now. Amazing and thanks again!!!
FORCETHETRUTH 3 years ago
Nice demonstration!
introvertebrate 3 years ago
Thats the smartest thing I have ever seen with the bedini. You are right on, and very smart for showing it this way! Thanks so much for all of your help!
FORCETHETRUTH 3 years ago
ur most welcome! (there is no limit to what u can do with this. Just think about bifilar coils)
breakthemachine 3 years ago
You might find it an interesting experiment to measure the voltage on both sides of the diode going to the charging battery.. The Bedini is addicting stuff :) Thank you for sharing.
marthale7 3 years ago
thank you it's clear. I'll try to replicate it Thanks
mochiam 3 years ago