Added: 6 months ago
From: RTDNewsroom
Views: 15,187
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (205)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • THis is simple- if u don't like it, don't fly, usa has much bigger fish to fry

  • @maptlbh so just let the government wire tap your phone, your internet, put a gps tracker on your vehicle, in your arm, in your phone, and CCTV recording throughout your own private property, including inside your house?

    THIS IS SIMPLE ITS ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION!

    Terrorism wins when we allow it to terrorize us. Fear is no excuse to give up our civil liberties, our RIGHTS.

  • Everyone needs to remember a few key tips in dealing with the TSA. (1) they cannot touch you unless you give them permission or consent (2) they cannot arrest you - they have to call a LEO for that, (3) ONLY thing they can do is prevent you from flying. If confronted with the scanner opt out, ask for a pat down in private so if there are issues you are not guilty of disturbing the screening process. Record your private pat down, you are allowed to do this. If they do something wrong report it

  • If you think these people protesting the TSA's practice somehow think all screening is pointless, well, perhaps you ought to go back and re-read the arguments - as the notion that all screening is pointless has not, nor ever been one of those arguments.

    Can people supporting this crap at least TRY to read, and comprehend the arguments being made? *sigh*

  • more on topic:

    Thanks aron tobey for protesting this gestapo/ israel constitution robbing process of going through phony security..... it robs you of your integrity also..... who wants people them? surely not me in the name of fake security.

  • i wish everyone had a gun on the plane im on....... thats the problem with gun control...... you dont control criminals...... its a known fact... you control the law abiding citizens and the bad guys know you are no threat to them,,,, if everyone had a gun it would be a very different country..... outlaw crime not guns

  • This has degenerated into a troll fight, and I will at this time withdraw my hand from the ring.

    To 80% of the people on here, you are why "youtube comments" is a cesspool.

  • These people must be put back in their place and taken down a few pegs.  As uncomfortable as it is seeing the guy in boxers with his stuff written, there was no reason to violate his rights. Fact.

  • @microtonemusiconline We need to understand the difference between people and citizens, before any real change can happen. The people own this country, the citizen is a slave of the US corporation, Fact.

  • To be fair i bet if a bomb went off and they werent doing searches then people would blame them for not raising security.

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig Dude, im just saying what would happen. People complain about this but it is a very effective way of stopping bomb attacks on planes and in airports. You complain now because its happening to you but the truth us that if they didnt do this and a bomb did go off, you would blame security.

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig The fuck? Listen, after 9/11 all you americans were criticising the security and begging the government to do something about it. They did. and now that they have you all hate it again. Security like this saves lives. So if you would like to be checked for bombs ONCE when you go on holiday, lesss than 10 times a year so that you can stop a bomb then why not?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @mch158 Shoving a probe up your ass "is a very effective way of stopping bomb attacks on planes and in airports. You complain now because its happening to you but the truth us that if they didnt do this and a bomb did go off, you would blame security." I hope you are just as content when the probe is up your ass or your wife's ass or your daughters ass or your son's ass, I am not waiting for this to happen, I am fighting it now, because I know it is all bull shit, you don't.

  • @donotconsent83 fine your funeral. Hey how many bombs have went off since they started this? None? Oh well then its definitely effective but if you want to lower security because you are too stupid to understand that they do it for security then go ahead.

    Bombs have been smuggled into airports under childrens clothing and close to private parts before, reasoning behind it is because security didnt check there.

  • @mch158 "under childrens clothing" What are you? A pedophile? No parent in their right mind should let a stranger touch their childs crotch! period! If that's the kind of freedom you are willing to give up for some "security", then you need your head examined! No child, nor their parents have the right to consent to searching of their genital area! That's the law, look it up! TSA are commiting CRIMES! Why are they not in jail?

  • @MsCreed31 I mean that terrorists have used children to smuggle bombs before. the IRA did it and soon many others will. Think about it. Security never used to check children at all so why not hide the bombs with the children?

    Im not saying that security can go feeling anyones privates. All im saying is that terrorists can and have used the thighs to hide bombs before. The TSA arent gonna finger anyone but if they dont search the thigh then that opens the possibility of a bomb threat.

  • @mch158 People can also stick bombs up their asses, you think they should start anal probing everyone too? That logic doesn't justify. You also contradict yourself "Security never used to check children at all", How many kid bombers happened before TSA "stepped up" security? NONE! BTW, you need to realize that by living in fear of terrorists, you have essentially lost your freedom. You have more of a chance to be attacked by a shark than attacked by a terrorist. Stop being scared!

  • @MsCreed31 WOW. "Oh they are taking our freedom hurr durr" You really think you are "Free"?

    In America you get a list of stuff you CAN do.

    Everywhere else you get a list of what you cant do.

    Tell me who is more free?

    Also, getting searched ONCE when you go on a plane isnt shit compared to when a bomb does get in and destroys families FOREVER. so fucking deal with it. Everyone getting seaarched ONCE means that when YOU are in the airport then YOU arent gonna get bombed.

  • @mch158 If your too ignorant to understand what freedom means, and what our Constitution stands for, why are you so concerned with a video of a protester? He is standing up for his rights and is a hero for it. By supporting these ILLEGAL searches you feel safer? hmmm so by seeing a grown man touching a childs crotch you feel safer? I think your a perv! Those searches have nothing to do with "security"! Otherwise, they would profile.

  • @MsCreed31 well they are clearly not illegal you fucking idiot

  • @mch158 It's illegal because children cannot legally submit to a search that involves molestation of their genital area, you fucktard! Neither can their parents. Look it up, here let me help your retarded brain, look up legal age of sexual consent. You can also look up child porn laws in your state, and find that it is indeed illegal, what the TSA is doing on a daily basis & we are protected from illegal searches by the IV Amendment. (IV is the roman numeral for the number 4,mmkay.)look it up

  • @mch158 Lets start probing you daily, if not bombs go off, that means probing you prevented the bombs, silly argument, isn't it?

  • @donotconsent83 Well isnt it silly that people are willing to put others lives in danger just because they are too ignorant to understand that it is security and not molestation.

    Im not saying the TSA should be touching your dick or vag, all im saying is that it is an effective way of preventing bombs.

  • It is even sillier to believe that their protest puts anybody in danger - or that your argument makes any sense. If security methods cross those legal, and psychological lines, then the fact that it is security doesn't somehow negate that. Nor does it mean they are ignorant - given how many protesters are demanding tried and true Israeli security methods, the cry of ignorance being ironic especially coming from somebody who made such bald-faced unfounded generalizations.

  • @travelsonic Put it this way: American Security was pretty low then the Twin Towers were destroyed. That caused you to go security crazy and complain about the lack of it. Now that there is higher security you complain.

  • @mch158 Yes...you seem to hit the nail on the head. People can have too little or can have too much. However, just like the tale we were taught as children...about the three bears?....there can be 'just right'...ya know, a middle ground.

  • Since when is flying a Right? Exactly its a privilege....so if the guidelines of you flying are you have to consent to a search...either do or dont...there is no violation of rights in this....

  • @MP3laster Traveling is a right, you drone. If traveling is a privilege then you can be easily contained in your home or your neighborhood, until you and the other drones make walking a privilege too. Wake up and take your head out of your ____, so you can smell and see the truth.

  • @donotconsent83 ...wow ....You have every RIGHT to travel, thats not what i said you illiterate dumbass.. You can happily walk to where ever you want. But when you get on someone elses property... I.E. the plane, you have to follow the rules to be searched. I cant stand the TSA either but if i CHOOSE to fly i know that im gonna have to consent to some form of a search. Thats like saying Driving is a RIGHT, which its not, Its a privilege, that can be taken away.

  • @MP3laster You are a drone, traveling by car is not a privilege it is a Right, without it you have not Freedom. You sound like a well brainwashed citizen, do you know what a US citizen is, do you know what the US Code is, do you know what the difference is between a people and a citizen, I bet not, so look in the mirror for Mr. Dumass or Mr. Drone. I am currently fighting in court for my Right to travel, and in doing so I am protecting the Rights of dumshits like you, who I care not for.

  • @donotconsent83 I really hate that you are this confused...explain to me how you cant drive at 10 years old.why can the dmv stop issuing you a license at certain ages in certain places.How can a drunk get his driving privilege taken away... please educate yourself because you are doing more harm than good..google the right or privilege to drive, also look up on the constitution about the difference between a right and a privilege

  • @MP3laster 10year old "drive" in many parts of the US (in Farms). You need to look up the diff between a Right and a privilege, look at the 14th Amendment, you sir are a US citizen which makes you a property with rights/privileges and no Rights/per the Declaration of Independence, you sir have been very much brain washed just like the 99% of the slaves in the 50 uninhabited Republics.

  • @donotconsent83 I have served my country proudly and learned what is worth fighting for. Fighting and dying for the RIGHTS of people. I wish more people understood the difference and didnt just think they knew the difference. Im very sad that you are this brainwashed into believing you have a right to whatever or however.... I dont agree with the TSA or alot of the Govt. policies but I know which are which. Educate yourself, you really seem to want to help others. you are hurting the cause.

  • @MP3laster And I, for one, thank you and truly appreciate your service. You are correct, a multitude of people in this country have been bribed in one way or another by the politicians who have used the public coffers to pay for programs that, in the end, become "entitlements." The definition of entitlement is the having the RIGHT to something (i.e. "I am ENTITLED to that .") Too many people conflate the terms rights & privileges. And, politicians agree as long as it wins votes.

  • @MP3laster Sir, in your heart you may have served your country, but what country did you serve? You in fact served a foreign entity known as the United States, a corporation located in the District of Columbia, a corporation that represents employees not people. There is not Government sir, only corporations, you in fact are a "franchise" of the US. The state, county or city you live in is in fact a corporation. Read the charters of these corporations and look for the word "people" not persons.

  • @donotconsent83 You can easily be contained in your home. Its called house arrest. You call me a drone when you dont even understand the rights you have. Please educate yourself so we as a people can stop the idiot things like the TSA.

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig you are exactly right and thats what i was saying. well trying to..i was just replying to his earlier post..of course traveling is a right. but how you travel is a privilege.

  • Comment removed

  • @MP3laster Flying is not a privilege. It is a commercially available service offered & sold to anyone with the means by which to pay for it. The companies who provide the service have the right to require security procedures as a part of the contract implicit in the purchase of a ticket, with the only penalty for non-compliance being refusal to board or use the service, not arrest or imprisonment. The GOVERNMENT, however, is precluded by the 4th Amendment from conducting the invasive searches.

  • Comment removed

  • @cyberties First, there are no contracts with corporations, only agreements, contracts are for people, corporations have agreements. Look at any Airline agreement, you will not find anything saying that people, men or women are required to do anything. You cannot be refused service of any kind unless you are hurting some or someone's property. Secondly, the Constitution does not apply to people, it applies to the US corporation, your Rights come from God, all your Rights are not written down.

  • @donotconsent83 Are you daft? I see and sign contracts on BEHALF of corporations on a daily basis. A corporation IS a legal entity and CAN enter into legally enforceable contracts. There is an implied contract between the buyer and seller of services such as commercial air travel. The airline agrees to provide travel on given terms, and the passenger agrees to abide by the airline's rules. It's all implicit since no documents are actually signed, other than the credit card payment slip.

  • @donotconsent83 I wholeheartedly agree that our rights come from God and are UNALIENABLE. If the Government gave us our rights, they can just as easily take them away. I disagree that one cannot be refused service of any kind. Any business can refuse service for any reason (there is recourse for the one who is refused based on race, gender, sexual orientation, creed, etc.). The purchase of goods and services constitutes an IMPLIED contract. "You can fly IF you allow the TSA to search you."

  • @cyberties You are wrong on many levels, and you did not understand the point about people. In your world of corporations, individuals and persons you are 100% correct. I do not operate as a person anymore, that is why I am in battle with the TSA enforcers in court now. If you are correct about your points, you can prove me totally wrong by simply showing me one Statute or Regulations that applies to people. TSA operates under administrative rules, which apply to US employees, not people.

  • @donotconsent83 You don't operate as a person anymore??? WTF??? I can't have a discussion with someone who makes no sense. Definition of your terms is in order, since you don't seem to use the commonly accepted definitions. What are "US employees" and how are they not "people?" Tell me where I am wrong and at what levels. Better yet, don't bother. This discussion is getting as tedious as the TSA's rules & regulations.

  • @cyberties I am talking Legal Law here sir. Look up the Legal Definition of person. I am not a fictional entity, are you? The definitions of my terms come from the founding documents, which you most likely never read, Ignorance of the sea on your part does not mean there is no sea.

    People are not persons, prove this wrong and the United States corporation will make you a hero. Read the Legal Law boy, I have.

  • @donotconsent83 As I said, without common terms, this coversation makes no sense. I am done.

    I can only recite my Grandma's favorite Bible verse: "Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him." Proverbs 26:4

  • @donotconsent83 Legal Law? Really??? As opposed to Illegal Law?

  • @cyberties As opposed to common law you drone, you are a waste of my time, go educate your self, good by.

  • @donotconsent83 Oh! So you mean statutory and constitutional laws, i.e.laws enacted by the legislative branch (that's Congress). Regulatory Laws are enacted by the executive branch (President, Cabinet Departments, Regulatory agencies, etc.) . Constitutional laws are initiated by the legislative branch and ratified by the states. Common law, on the other hand, is based on precedents handed down by the judiciary. All laws are part of the Legal System. I am not the one in need of an education.

  • @cyberties No sir, you are incorrect again. Common Law is the Law of the people, not of the corporation. Law is determined by a Jury, not by the Congress. Precedents are based on Jury decisions, not Judicial decisions or opinions, and opinion is not a Law and no one in the Judicial branch has any Authority to create Law, but those who have been brainwashed believe the power is in the Judges not the Jury. If you give up the Tribunal to the Judge, you have no Justice, wake up !

  • @donotconsent83 I'm done. Law is determined by a jury? Precedents are based on jury decisions? Juries decide verdicts based on EXISTING laws and evidence presented in court. Precedents are set at the APPEALS level, where there are no juries and relate to PROCEDURES (during the investigation, arrest, or trial).

    Tell the little green men that if they want to analyze your brain, they will have to use their anal probe. You need to take your meds.

  • @cyberties  Ignorance is "heaven",enjoy it.

  • @donotconsent83

    If ignorance is heaven, you must be Saint Peter.

  • Comment removed

  • TSA gets the idea that we are just cattle, one bump in their shit unconstitutional job and this is what happens.

  • seeing this only brings one thing to mind: the terrorists have already won.

  • @roflsaur1337 Yes the United States has mostly won, but some of us are doing what we can to at least protect our family from tyranny.

  • They did not arrest the woman who went through in a bikini as a protest.I wonder why? Seriously arrested and cuffed are you kidding it would be funny if it wasn't real.

  • nice

    

  • This young man is correct. He stood up to those TSA Nazis and HLS. what is this? 1933 Germany? Since when is it OK to violate your 4th and 14th Amendment? It's NOT. More people should be doing this. It's your rights that are being taking away if you allow it. STOP THIS BS. If everyone would refuse to follow their orders, then the plane will not fly. It will cost the airlines BIG TIME MONEY. That's what we need to do. So fuck you TSA Nazis, and if you touch me, you will get your ass kicked.

  • @fjerins Why are you quoting the 14th Amendment, do you know it only applies to freed slaves, are you a freed slave? Slaves are property with only granted rights, are you a slave or a people? people have Rights from God, where did you get your Rights?

  • That is an exclusion from 1973 in the 4th Amendment. All these law school grads need to read past the first paragraph.

  • [1] Airport screenings of passengers and their baggage constitute

    administrative searches and are subject to the limitations

    of the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Davis, 482

    F.2d 893, 908 (9th Cir. 1973) (noting that airport screenings

    are considered to be administrative searches because they are

    “conducted as part of a general regulatory scheme” where the

    essential administrative purpose is “to prevent the carrying of

    weapons or explosives aboard aircraft”)

  • @bsixseven Calling a carbuncle a mole doesn't make it any less infectious and/or deadly. These TSA procedures are no less invasive (and FAR more than "administrative") than the procedures used by police when stopping a suspect. Except the police are held in check by the 4th amendment. There is required by the courts probable cause to believe the person they search has ACTUALLY commited a crime. Yet the TSA has no such restriction.

    This is all for show anyway. No one is any safer with TSA.

  • @cyberties Laws regarding passenger screenings have been active since the 70's. This nothing new. I feel better that everyone gets checked rather than no one getting checked.

  • @bsixseven Well, because you FEEL better, the TSA has accomplished its goal. These screenings have yet to curtail a terrorist. The so-called airport security procedures are theater...put on to assuage the fears of the sheeple so they will "FEEL" safe and continue to spend their travel money on the airlines.

    In addition, before the TSA usurped the authority, airlines were responsible for airport security. That the government has delegated itself this power is that to which I object.

  • @cyberties How can you be sure an attack hasn't been stopped. Detered is the same . You see how well the airline handled security.

  • @bsixseven

    The TSA is REACTIVE not proactive. To wit: immediately after the "shoe" bomber, we were forced to remove our footwear; immediately after the "underwear" bomber, we were forced to undergo a full body scan or genital groping. And, in EACH of those cases, the PASSENGERS prevented the terrorists from succeeding. Meanwhile TSA searches little old ladies & people in wheelchairs, all in the name of political correctness to avoid being viewed as racist. TSA= image above substance.

  • @bsixseven So where was the explosives on this half naked man? Up his ass? They detained him for nine hours to prove that the Constitution DOES NOT APPLY TO THESE FASCISTS!

  • @jerryballew37 The Times article said detained for 90 minutes. That is 1 hour and 30 minutes.

  • @bsixseven Look up the definition of passenger, are you cargo? if you are a US citizen you are cargo.

  • @donotconsent83 What are you talking about. Where do you get cargo. The law us vs davis, from 1973, says passenger. 

  • @bsixseven When legally speaking, transportation refers to commerce, only property is transported or exchanged in commerce, if passengers are being transported then it must be property. Persons are property, people are not property. If you look closely at the case you are quoting, I am sure you will see this points.

    Persons are transported, people travel, this maybe above your head, but it is the truth.

    That is why everything you do commercially is done with your name in all caps, person.

  • @donotconsent83 Every case against the airport screenings violating the 4th have failed. Case closed. Next time some dumbass brings a guns to the airport, we'll put him on your plane. Deal?

  • You would think that people that decry slavery would be hyper sensitive to attacks on freedom, property rights (a right to your own body) and illegal searches in the name of safety.

    It is well known that government cannot protect anyone and at the very best show up well after the event to clean up the mess. The only way a society can become civil is if the citizens are armed so that they can protect themselves in accordance with common law and common sense. Govt manufactures terror to enslave

  • @imatreetopflyer  True, except that there is no Government, there is only a corporation governing under color of law with the people's consent, I for one, no longer consent to this lunacy.

  • @donotconsent83 Neither do I, I refuse to fly.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • YouTube is part of the criminal establishment. Of course there are only 306 views!

    This man is a hero. We should all be so fortunate to have his strength and courage.

    The government of this country has become disgusting! It is a disgrace.

    FU Bar. S.

  • Pretty hot, if you ask me.

  • @Belgian27 Yeah, but judging from the video you have on your youtube channel, Kentucky Fried Chicken is upi your alley as well. Which is hotter?

  • missing seconds ????

  • Still 306 views.

  • Odd how Drudge and others were silent when these practices were started and going on during the Bush administration. Additionally, you do not have a constitutional right to fly unmolested anymore then you have a right to drive the public roads without being stopped and searched by the police. When you get a driver's liscense or buy a ticket you sign away certain rights. If you don't like it DON'T FLY, but please spare me your faux outrage.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig Do you mean Unalienable rights? there is a huge difference between these two terms, Unalienable Rights come from God, Inalienable rights come from the US corporation, which ones do you have?

  • @TonyGehrig Are you that stupid or just ignorant, read the Declaration of Independence for yourself ass wipe, and grow up, you are dead wrong. The quote says unalienable, go back to you gov school, and start over.

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig Are you some little boy trying to play in a man's world, you sound like you have no clue, good by little boy, go play with you GI Joe.

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig Wow, you can not even read or what, THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE YOU MORON, not the constitution, get your head out of your ass, if you are so smart at least try not to be so stupid on paper, it creates evidence of your ignorance. I expect an apology from you.

  • @MrTbosn5

    You would make a good little Nazi.

  • @MrTbosn5 Could you please show me where this is written, the part about giving up rights, I'll bet you cannot find it.

  • He should know better. He SHOULD have been recording with his phone.

  • well here is another viewer and if the counter is correct I become number 307 to view.

  • still 306 views @7:57 EST 8/11/11

  • @TonyGehrig--Don't know or care if you have ever protested, but you protest to make someone aware of a wrong or something you see as wrong. He has gotten a lawer involved. That is not a protest it is a "set up". Cool off and see my comment as it is. I think TSA is the wrong way to protect the public from wrong doing on a flight.

  • @MrRickydill -- He didn't get the publicity until he sued the feds. (And you need a lawyer for that.)

  • @kpboucher You do not need a lawyer to sue anyone. As a people your best bet is to sue the individual who trespassed you Rights, not the corporation, you do this in a court of record.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • this is linked at The Drudge Report. There are thousands of people viewing this

  • Comment removed

  • the counter was at over 100,000 views yesterday. youtube is cia/northcom screening tech. Ive had numerous videos about the NW0 disappear right after I download them.

  • Still 306

    

  • 306 views at 6:47 Toronto time.

  • Well, I watched it so it should be at least 307.

  • 306 views at 6:42 detroit time...... ok

  • 306 views at 6:42 detroit time......

  • HA, another sheep thinks he got some kind of rights! I wonder what country he thinks he's living in...

  • @spaceboy537

    Yes, not sticking up for the rights granted in the social contract from which our government derives its power-- that certainly makes YOU the smart one. Everyone should go on parroting your line, "we dont have any rights".

    Comments like yours neither contribute to a discussion, nor are healthy for anyone in a democracy to say. The most beneficial thing you could do would be to keep your pessimism to yourself.

  • @LordLimecat get informed -----> infowarsdotcom and prisonplanetdotcom

  • @spaceboy537 Alex Jones is a propaganda machine, he gives no solutions.

  • @LordLimecat so you are saying we live in a democracy or that you like a democracy. The current system which governs under color of law is a democracy, but only citizens are governed by this mob rule, people are not, so what are you a citizen or a people?

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig Yeah . . . it even says 306 after my viewing, didn't know they did things like that . . .

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig Google like all corporations are agents of the governing corporation, their main purpose is to keep you ignorant and poor, if you do not like it start acting like a people and not a citizen.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig That's how every YouTube video has ever worked. It's stupid mindless conspiracy shouting like your comment that make legitimate freedom-loving people look bad =/

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig When I video goes up, the views stop at around 305. Every single video. I don't claim to know why, but every single video does it. The views will increase in a day or two, just like every single other video does.

  • @TonyGehrig Here's a couple examples: /watch?v=o9GL6BQwv9E /watch?v=DRDCgo1V2f8 /watch?v=4FSuIzl2nCc Before throwing on the tinhat, make sure you know what you're talking about. There is no conspiracy. Videos stop at just over 300 views for a day or two. They just do.

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig Youtube or big brother......

  • @TonyGehrig they about have to be seeing as I have never seen this vid,I am logged in, I viewed it, came back and it still reads 306 views. What my view doesnt count?

  • @TonyGehrig 3 hours after you posted this....and i still see 306 views. How does that figure?? Maybe they don't update views automatically???

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig Simply asking the question doesn't mean I'm "buying it". It simply means I don't know how they update the number. a day later I'm seeing 2,128. Drudge gets millions of hits per day and you know most of the people are going to look at this video. And common sense tells me youtube is run by liberal hacks and is totally in bed with the far left. So don't try to put my "common sense" on trial simply because I wondered if views are updated in real time.

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig YOU ARE RETARDED AND HAVE NO IDEA HOW YOUTUBE VIEWS WORK.

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig View counts on popular videos update at a slower rate to save server bandwith, you cretin.

    Also, how can one be "diluted"?

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig Did you completely miss the part where I said viewcounts update slowly to reduce server load? Silly boy!

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig You have absolute zero evidence to any of your claims. It is equally probable that a small amount of people viewed the video and you have no proof otherwise.

    This is not the ONLY youtube video. If every view counter processed in real time the servers would get bogged down, as it also takes in where the hits are coming from, the duration the viewer stays etc. It's not my problem if you don't understand simple server mechanics. YOU'RE* "diluted"!

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig Haha, you're incredible. You think that the hit counter delay is a conspiracy? Should've guessed you were a slow one, judging by the fact your videos comprise mainly of you shooting guns. HURHUR.

    Again, you have supplied no evidence. I have, whether you want to believe it or not is obviously up to you. But until you give me something to backup your absurd ramblings, you're just another crazy internet guy nobody gives two shits about.

  • @TonyGehrig And nobody "reviews" it. I told you, it's an automated process to reduce server load. It happens to every popular video, and the fact viral videos often stall at "301" views makes my claims pretty truthful. Less popular videos don't have this cap applied because the rate at which they garner views doesn't pose a threat to the sites performance. Get a clue.

  • @TonyGehrig In closing you know fuck all about server maintenance and how things like this work. You are incorrectly correlating a scripted server event to some sort of global conspiracy. Whilst I agree the TSA are absolute cretins, you're completely wrong about this, dude.

  • @TonyGehrig If you go on any popular video, bud, you'll see the same thing. Whether it's political, comedy or a COD commentary. I have my evidence. Now, friend, where is yours?

  • Comment removed

  • @TonyGehrig No, my sample is studying popular videos vs less popular ones and digging around the internet. Plus it's just common knowledge to cap a CPU intensive process in favour of keeping the rest of the site stable.

    Also, not being an American citizen (with no intention of ever going there) means I am not currently subject to your fucked up laws and amendments. Enjoy your guns while you still have them, babe. Sooner or later you'll lose those, too.

  • @TonyGehrig Also, it's YOU'RE* not YOUR. If you want to sound intelligent at least grasp the basic principles of possession. :P

  • @AlexPlaysGames Holy shit your British. should have known why your such an angry little man! you dont have any rights at all do you Chap! No written Constitution meaning NO Constitution at'tal! Well Jeeves, that explains it. Another Limey bastard that thinks he knows what is happening in America. Pathetic. here is idea, focus on the riots in your streets. Focus on your mess. Then maybe the world would listen. Cheerio.

  • @TonyGehrig Haha. I can board a plane here without getting searched. Can you? ;)

  • @TonyGehrig And if you think I'm angry, let's look at who thinks youtube is censoring video counts to hide the truth, with no evidence to prove it! Oh, wait, that's right..it's you! TEEHEE

  • @TonyGehrig A written constitution doesn't mean shit if agencies like the TSA are bypassing it, btw. Your ancient documents are losing relevance! OH NO!

  • @TonyGehrig likes are instaneously saved, views don't get posted till the next day, so CALM THE FUCK DOWN

  • If I were him I would have let out a giant FART, which is a bomb of putrid air that comes out of your ass.

  • The TSA agents are so damn blind to reality, that they are taught the Constitution is null and void to the power of the DHS.