Added: 2 years ago
From: videoScribble
Views: 3,355
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (637)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • One day soon all these fucking retarded modern feminists are going to realize the feminist movement was never about women's rights. It was about getting an entire gender to also work as slaves for the rich elite like men always did. Now women would have to pay taxes etc. So yeah, feminism made the rich richer. Not to mention women now did not care about having a family as much. They just wanted success and money. Leaving an entire generation of kids in front of the television to be raised by TV.

  • @FoetusInYourNoodles It was about women's rights. Yes the elite accomplished some goals through the movement, though that doesn't undermine the positive consequences for womens rights

  • @fuckingsickadventure what positives? I'm sure there is, but I cant think of many in comparison to the ills it started: ever rising divorce rates, growing resentment between the sexes, boys being marginalized in the school system, slut culture, I can go on if u want.

  • LOL!!! 2:08 "My partner went out to work (He worked his fucking ass off providing for an entire family by himself. Working all day every day)". Then the feminist reporter says "So there you were endlessly loading the washing machine! :( And oh no! Mashing a banana! Doing all that stuff, did you resent yourself?". LOL!!!!!! OH NO! You poor thing! Those bastard men! Women were built to have/raise family's. And men were built to provide this family with shelter and food. Feminism destroyed family.

  • LOL She just admitted it 2:08 that she did all the housework although she worked outside of the house. See feminists just make it harder on themselves and other women.

  • This is a great series. Huge thanks to the uploader.

  • Men and women are equal, but they are not the same. There are things that women are just naturally better at and things that men are just naturally better at. SO while I would say we are of equal quality, we just have different biology. We shouldn't lower the bar for women for things like military, policing and firefighters, for example:How is that equality?

  • 4:02This is dumb LOL Women R Not equal 2 men,men R not equal 2 women.They R different N play different roles.4 starters,women have wombs N ovaries,a men don't,men have testicles,scrotum which women don't.Of course we both R to be valued, respected W/ the same intensity and magnitude.However it's really asinine 2 believe we R equal,then beg 4 equal rights.Which ByTheWay men don't have many either,so Y would some women settle 2 B equally rightLESS? Y not aim higher CLAIMING ALL our Human rights?

  • To the lazy fat ass who "endlessly loads the dishwasher: no it's not fascinating when u look at the difference between FANTASY and REALITY. I'm sure your husband fantasizes about coming home to a fit woman with ample breasts and nice buttocks... Instead he had to come home to you. Fair trade.

  • @MrGoblue85 Good point but I take exception to the notion that the trade was fair, at least to her husband. Working a lifetime away and likely going to an early grave in exchange for regular sex with an attractive wife who doesn't work or earn her own resources sounds like a sketchy deal at best. Making the same sacrifices in exchange for infrequent sex with an enormous trough feeder seems to me a fate even worse than death.

  • @2:10 Who ENDLESSLY loads a washing machine in private life that is not involved in the laundry business. Such exaggerations ruin any argument these people have. You don't have to clean ALL day or cook ALL day or do laundry ALL day,7 days a week. Admit you got board DO NOTHING ALL DAY and you wanted excitement. Once some of these women got out into the real world and held down a job many of them couldn't wait to go back to staying at home and doing nothing all day. Such silly nonsense..

  • @flame0731 You're a Feminist through and through despite your efforts to downplay it, and frankly Feminists of any stripe are abominable. Women conjured up a Utopian society where men would do the housework that women were previously doing while men worked to keep a roof over their heads. Then you agree that women will look down on men who stay at home, but it's men's own fault that women look down on them for staying at home. So you get what you want then you blame men for how you view them.

  • @jmitnick210 Excuse you. It's is really quite easy to make a statement such as "you're a feminist through and through" I have not only downplayed that statement but I have eradicated it. I'm a humanist. You wanna call me a feminist. I'll just call you a misogynist. It really is very easy to make false statements.

    "you agree that women looko down on men who stay at home" - Yes I did say that. I also said that it was wrong for the women to think that way...Learyn to read idiot. Don't twist it

  • @jmitnick210 Oh and never did I blame men for women looking down on them for staying at home. If you're going to quote me. First of all cite it word for word in quotes and don't take it out of context asshole. If anything I said men are to blame for their own inequality in today's society. I say this because they allow women to have the same rights as themselves yet they still don't allow even each other to have the same rights women do i/e staying home. That is what I said if anything. Fuck off

  • @flame0731 Feminists and their apologists are to blame for any inequality men face in society today. Women gained more rights and privileges at the expense of men and are still lamenting a conceived patriarchy that somehow continues to oppress them. Fuck off bitch.

  • @jmitnick210 feminists are not t solely to blame for the inequality. Men are as well because like I said. They perpetuate the inequality with continuously acting like sheep and supporting such ideals as chivalry or "that men should work" etc. Women did gain more rights you are correct. Now why is that? hmm well because men were all for them having the same rights as themselves, but again like I said. They weren't for themselves having the rights of wm. Patriarchy was real. kiss my ass douchebag

  • @jmitnick210

    Men have this view of provider - thus courts give custody to women because nurture is better psychologically. (hmm perpetuated by men)

    Men have this view that they should pay for the 1st date. Or open the door - thus women have come to accept chivalry as a way to say "hey I'll just save my money away and in the end if this guy isn't my type I'm not out anything)- hmm another thing perpetuated by men

    Funny how men can dish it out but can't take it when feminists do the same thing

  • @flame0731 No, women are given custody of children because we live in a gynocracy plain and simple -- more specifically, because the laws are heavily slanted in women's favor. Feminists and the women that say nothing to oppose the sexism fomented by Feminism against men, profess to want equality across the board. Yet women clearly have the upper hand in matters of marriage & divorce, reproductive rights, etc. etc. The truth is feminists don't want equality, they want special privileges. cont...

  • @flame0731 As far as chivalry is concerned -- it's outmoded. It cannot coexist with the status quo of equality between men and women. Chivalry implies special treatment of women, which is something that defies the Feminist / status quo ideal of equality. I suspect you agree with me on that though, since you're a Feminist. Women will still take advantage of some men who still adhere to traditional male/female roles, but increasingly thanks to the MRM, this is changing. Marriage is also passe btw.

  • @jmitnick210 Excpet I'm not a feminist. i don't like how women get custody in marriage but I deny that it is the fault of feminists. I don't like that men have unequal reproductive rights, but currently the way the MRAs want it would not allow for it to be equal. I have a more finite plan. Basically referring to legal documentation. Also using comdoms should be drilled into both young girls and boys heads. Young men rust that a women is on birth control with is stupid. Protect yourself I say

  • @jmitnick210 According to you feminists would in fact like chivalry, since it benefits them not men. I dislike it because of this reason. Of course women will take advantage of men who adhere to traditional female and male roles. Rightfully so because those men are fools. There is no reason to adhere to them. I'm not saying go to female supremacy (feminist) I'm saying total equality (humanist/equalist). So don't claim I'm a feminist when you know nothing.

  • @flame0731 Feminists have the upper hand in Western society and they want to maintain their position of power over men. Feminists along with bleeding-heart liberals and spineless simps who fought on behalf of Feminism oversteered in their attempt to right the perceived wrongs. This is what needs to be redressed as I'm sure being a self-dubbed humanist/equalist and based on some of your other comments, you'll agree with me about that; parity on men's behalf is the order of the day for equalists.

  • @jmitnick210 1. I don't really see how anything you said in the first part of your comment is relevant. Especially since you were directly attacking me. Bleeding heart liberals? hahaha liberals and conservatives are all pathetic. Conservatives seeks to run the country like a christian dictatorship. With sexism included and liberals are too caring. The wrongs weren't perceived. Though I can agree they feminists have begun to overstep their bounds.

  • @flame0731 There was no ad hominem in my previous reply; I wasn't directly attacking you. Why the overly-sensitive, emotional response? And I'm not a GOP/Conservative nor am I a Liberal/Leftist. Much of the Feminist movement, in fact the most seminal aspect of it was a histrionic perception by a bunch of radical lesbians of victimization by a perceived "patriarchy". That's not to say injustice by either gender did not exist, but the male/female dichotomy was greatly exaggerated.

  • @jmitnick210 "The was no ad hominem"- I was referring to another comment you made. I must have read it wrong because I can't find it. "why the overly-sensitive, emotional response"- calling liberals and conservative pathetic isn't overly emotional. Why so critical?

    "radical lesbians, victimization by the perceived patriarchy"- Patriarchy did exist. Historians have documented it. The male/female dichotomy was pretty dead on. I mean the simple right of women to vote outraged men. No lesbos

  • @jmitnick210 It's ironic you say thanks to MRM/MRA yet you aren't attacking young romantic. He firmly believe in tradition which is contradictory to the so called equality movement MRAs want. Hell he doesn't even think gays can be apart of the MRA movement. That alone shows your bias.

  • @flame0731 Adhering to Biblical scripture would be ideal but I cast my lot with the MRM because my rationale is to give Feminists what they want or at least what they profess to want, which is equality across the board. Let's do away with the ridiculous and outdated ideals of marriage and special treatment. The Feminist clarion call early on was that marriage was slavery for women. Ironically, it is actually quite the opposite these days. Men have nothing to gain and much to lose in marriage.

  • @jmitnick210 Would be ideal? Wow and you attack the feminists. You have no right to attack them when here you are adhering to the sexism of biblical scripture. Biblical scripture is the male version of feminism. It is interesting you have a true perspective that marriage early on was slavery for women and now the opposite is true for men. The issue is that men nowadays adhere to tradition which brings it upon themselves the inequality. It reverts back to the point I stated earlier.

  • @flame0731 Yes, Biblical scripture would be the ideal standard. Anything less than subservience by women to men will not work because the word of God has already mandated how both men and women should live. Based on your other comments I'm aware you don't agree and that's fine. I'm not trying to proselytize; your fiery fate is consigned with your rejection of God. To rephrase my previous comment that you're referring to, it was a perception of marriage being akin to slavery by rad. Feminists.

  • @jmitnick210 Ohhh myyy god. You bitch about the sexism towards men, saying they don't deserve it then go and say something misogynistic like "anything less than subservience by women to men will not work."

    Pss you aren't even an MRA. You're just a sexist man. "the word of god" ha!!! The word of god says that if a women is rapedby a man she must marry him, but if she does the same she should be stoned. Yeah the good book is definitely gods word. It was written by men. Duh.

  • @flame0731 @flame0731 This will be my last response to your inane comments. You claim to not be a Feminist but your arguments are those of an inveterate, staunch Feminist or apologist. Your actual support for men's rights is at best dubious. My aim is to expose Feminism and its hypocrisy, including Feminists like you. The truth of the matter is, the MRM does not need support from Feminists and with friends like you, who needs enemies. cont. ...

  • @flame0731 God's word is not misogynist and what you refer to as historical patriarchy is simply the natural order of things that evolved over millennia which were beneficial to both men and women. What I advocated is not sexist or enslavement of women. On the contrary it entails true love and happiness between men and women and leads to salvation. What you advocate in a nutshell, promotes confusion and discord, and leads straight to hell. q.v. Ephisians 5:21-33 I will not respond to you further

  • @jmitnick210 God's word is very VERY misogynist. What do you call demanding a victim of rape marry her abuser when the man commits the act but if a women does the same she should be stoned? Oh that's not misogynist at all. Or in genesis how Eve's punishment was harsher than Adam's even though he had his own free will. I didn't say god was misogynist. I said the man mad book is. Therefore it is not the word of a just and equal being. Get over your delusion

  • @jmitnick210 The natural order? We aren't neanderthals anymore. So therefore patriarchy was and in some cases is very very real. Patriarchy was why women didn't go to school and men did. The natural order? The natural order is for us to live in caves fool. We've evolved so therefore the "order" has evolved. duh

    What you advocate is not only enslavement of women but sexist towards men because it is unfair. You sir are not an member of the MRM.

  • @jmitnick210 You're salvation isn't real. what i advocate promotes clarity and organization and leads to the true heaven of a non sexist god. Not the one of a book WRITTEN BY HUMAN MEN. Hell it wasn't even conceived until years after jesus died. Obviously the men who wrote it put their own 2 cents in stupid.

  • @jmitnick210 YOU----What I advocated is not sexist or enslavement of women......"Yes, Biblical scripture would be the ideal standard. Anything less than subservience by women to men will not work"

    subservience is enslavement. Learn the english language. Obviously that is what you advocate

  • @jmitnick210 At best dubious? please I support men's rights but don't think they should "rule" as you do. I on the other hand think MRAs are necessary to combat the inequality. You on the other hand see them as necessary because men are superior. My inane comments. Lol. You're a sexist hypocrite. You claim men have been oppressed but then you demand they not only push back but do the exact same done to them. Which is what feminists did. The cycle will not end with that mindset fool

  • @jmitnick210 I'm not a feminist. Funny thing is you do what other men claim women do when someone disagrees with them. You call me a feminist just because I expose your true motives.

  • @jmitnick210 My fiery fate is consigned with my rejection of God? Um honey. God didn't write the bible. It's full of contradictions. Hell the two beginning stories don't match up with time. The bible was written by sexist men. Not by a loving and just god. Justice cannot exist if things are not equal. I'm going to heaven. You're the one that will burn. Marriage was slavery. To both sexes. Women couldn't vote, couldn't work, had not choice in whether or not to have sex, the list goes on.

  • @jmitnick210 No women get custody because of exactly the ideals I stated. You just won't admit it being you're ignorant to the truth. The laws are heavy slanted towards women because again men constantly perpetuate the idea towards women's favor. Another example is say in survival situations, men think they should be the one do die protecting a women. Yeah......I'm right again. I'm sorry but when it comes to reproductive rights that is a very complicated issue. Seeing as men can't get pregnant

  • @flame0731 It seems we both agree Western law is heavily slanted in favor of women and this needs to be redressed. What we don't agree on is who is to blame for the current state of affairs or the status quo. While I believe Feminism is the root cause of not only the inequality and injustices that men must endure but also the reason society in general is doomed to fail -- you obviously believe otherwise. You're entitled to your opinion as I am to mine.

  • @jmitnick210 We agree it is slanted in favor of women but I disagree and lay the blame with the men that reaffirm the idea of gender roles. It is quite ridiculous to say feminism is the reason society is doomed to fail. Since the injustices began with men since before the dawn of our modern society. Dating back to even kings and queens.

  • @flame0731 Feminism is the prevailing ideology in the Western wold / U.S., the status quo as it were, which is diametrically opposed to traditional gender roles, so it is Feminism that perpetuates sexism against men. The misandry that is prevalent, fiat laws favoring women over men, the mind share disproportionately given to women's issues, where men are barely a footnote and seen as disposable -- all stems from Feminism. Yes, society is doomed to fail with Feminism at the helm. 

  • @jmitnick210 "laws favoring women over men"- so you're saying instead of women they should favor men? How about they don't favor either really.

    "diametrically opposed to traditional gender roles, so it is feminism that perpetuates sexism against men"- traditional gender roles perpetuate sexism to both sides. Men themselves agree they are disposable "survival" situations anyone? Society is doomed to fail with "men at the helm" as well.

  • @flame0731 A commenter on another thread summed it up succinctly:

    "Equal rights for women? Like when men and women turn 18 women automatically have the right to vote but men are denied that right until they register for the military draft or face potential legal action?

    We're ready if you are. Ready?"

    Men acquiesced to the constant haranguing of Feminism for decades and in doing so, created a mess of society. Feminism has been an abject failure. Men need to realize this and go our own way

  • @jmitnick210 Lol commenter from another thread is stating basically how I feel. The issue is that men are the ones that argue women shouldn't register for the draft, or actually do physical fighting on the front lines. I mean the closest a women gets other than maybe being a spy, if that, is to drive a truck. Clearly men aren't ready

    I disagree that feminism has been an abject failure. There were positives. Right to vote, right to work, more college attendance, among other things.

  • @flame0731 You missed the point. I'll expound. Women by way of Feminism claim to want equality with men in all spheres of life. Yet when it comes to certain domains that require sacrifice or that entail hardship, like the military draft mentioned and fighting equally alongside men in combat positions, women are conveniently silent. All equalists including MRAs are or should be in league on this issue and demand that women should not receive preferential treatment w/ re to the draft or any manner

  • @flame0731 "I disagree that feminism has been an abject failure"

    With the genocide of millions upon millions of men's offspring; societal decay and rampant crime exceptionally high among single-mother families; the disproportionately high (incentivized) divorce rates initiated by women in most cases; a politically correct atmosphere that abhors dissenting views; the blurring of gender roles in an androgynous milieu and the emasculation of males ... among other reasons ... Feminism has failed.

  • @jmitnick210 "genocide of men's offspring"- Oh god the abortion top. It's not genocide. Take a anatomy and biology course. It's also not just "men's" offspring. It's the women as well. Sadly men can't get pregnant. Men want rights to a women's body basically. Then they relinquish the rights to their semen. That would be equal. MRAs won't do that though. Divorce wasn't caused by feminism. Marriage is enslavement to both sexes if they aren't happy in it. Gender roles shouldn't exist at all.

  • @jmitnick210 Oh and divorce isn't incentivized. Feminism hasn't failed. Again VOTE, COLLEGE ATTENDANCE ABILITY TO WORK OUTSIDE THE HOME.

    For you to say gender roles shouldn't be blurred, if not totally abolished, well....then you are embracing men being on the losing end.

  • @jmitnick210 Oh no I grasped the point, but I flipped the blame to where it belongs. It is irrelevant if they spoke up or not. Yes they should have but funny thing is that the military leadership didn't say anything. Now isn't that ironic. Goes back to my statement about sexism in survival situations. I mean hell some of the arguments by men that are against it feel that in the field men will "protect the women" when in reality is should be the whole unit.

  • @jmitnick210 Most equalists are on the side of MRAs in this issue. Are you implying I'm not?

  • @flame0731 you are so right lol Troy burned bcuz of a gay male r.ship right? queen bloody mary of england didnt massacre thousands of christians right? oh yeah history is filled with women who bring societies down. not all but most historical references to women in power end in up in the worst bloodshed. Wasnt a Dutchess of France executed for telling the public to eat cake when they were dying of starvation during the french revolution??,, and lets not go back to the garden of eden.

  • @wakeus777 You need to learn who you respond to let alone it was 3 MONTHS AGO

    1. Troy didn't burn to the ground because of male partnership. Seriously? Take a history lesson. You look like a fool. I actually support gay rights. Queen Mary didn't massacre thousands of christians and the christians didn't commit genocide in the crusades. Bring societies down? One of the greatest societies in the world was brought down by a MAN. Julius Cesar anyone? I personally don't think either gender is caus

  • @flame0731 wow!! you are too serious my friend. Do you understand when someone is being humurous and only kidding.> I know why troy burned! because of HELEN OF TROY DURHHHHH!! I was just showing you through those questions, how your logic applies. & thank you for pointing out just how silly you sound haha Gimme a break. Actaully Julius Ceaser was betrayed by Cleopatra who helped organize the conspiracy. Oh wait you still reading wiki huh? I actually read these things called BOOKS. u shud try it

  • @wakeus777 lol. Dude, I was simply stating that you all have been arguing about this for 3 months, 4 months now... and for the record, I'm not a feminist.

  • @jed52 hahaha bro.that was meant for that flame0731 ding dong... not you my bad bro lol

  • @wakeus777 1. You're typing so I can't see facial expression thus how am i to know you're kidding. Do you understand how the human mind works? Notice that who didn't wnat Helen to leave? Who took her away knowing what would happen? Helen isn't responsible for the fact that the men were too weak to control their urges. Same as men now. I personally don't do it but IF I wanted to it'd be easy. Look on yahoo. Girl survives off 1200. Perfect example of WEAK MEN. My logic is sound yours is not.

  • @wakeus777 Lol I do read books and it wasn't Cleopatra. You might actually want to read real history books (yeah the things done by real imperical historians) not sexist independent authors. You should try it. Oh and take an english course. you is spelt y.o.u not just u

  • @flame0731 And also to add about Julius Ceaser. The empire was actually run well and flourished under his rule. It was his assassination that caused the downfall of the roman empire. Ceaser was loved by the poor and middle class. it was aristrocrats and his whore lover that killed him. CLITpatra married Marc A. after. And since Cleopatra was behind it...hmmmmm 2+2=... cmon I know you know this one!!! yeah exactly! u should learn to gather your resources before putting your foot in your mouth.

  • @wakeus777 the downfall of the empire was he couldn't control it. Too much power to one man. Kind of like how Alexander the great was stretched too thing. Queen Elizabeth was a geat queen but she also had her problems. rule has nothing to do with gender. Oh note caesar shouldn't have let Cleopatra manipulate him. It doesn't make her a whore. It makes him a dumbass. Aww poor man unable to accept responsibility for thinking with his dick instead of his brain. Take the foot out of your mouth

  • @wakeus777 The garden of Eden is pathetic. Eve made a choice, Adam made a choice. Quit being a fucking victim and making the women a scapegoat. Adam KNEW it was wrong he should have stayed united with her in her defense but he should not have dropped to her level. Let's not forget who created the world and is typically referred to as a male.

  • @flame0731 HAHA actually u women play the victims all the time.Im just pointing out the facts. Theres a reason why Satan went after eve first, but of course your limited intellect would know everything right? nobody asked if you were a gay satanic sex magic butt lover, so who cares? How can I listen to a persons logic who cant come to grips w the fact that they support something that defies the natural order? no fag gene. if there were you all would b able to reproduce. nature tells you to stfu

  • @wakeus777 I never said women don't play the victim now did I. I personally don't. But hey. Shows like disney teach women to play the victim because "men like to save you" so again it reverts back to ancient MALE teachings. There's a reason why Satan went after eve? My limited intellect? haha for you to even believe the bible proves how much further my intellect is than yours. Do you believe in Santa Claus too?

  • @wakeus777 Actually there is a gay gene. Or it could be a combination of multiple genes. Take a simply bio course in college. Many human traits come about because of two genes acting to cause it. So it could be more than one. Also 1,500 animal species exhibit homosexual behavior Dolphins (very intelligent mammals) have predominately homosexual relationships. So...obvious Nature says it's fine. Idiot. Go as god (tooth fairy) for the truth like you always do

  • @flame0731 I just want to intersect that animals including humans display homosexuality, however you can not say thats because "nature thinks its okay", because you are implying it then has evolutionary value. You might say nature doesnt care though, because errors in the gene reproduction system, like gays, do not reproduce gays if they reproduce at all.

    Btw, it is by no means certain there is a gay gene. some research actually indicate it is a neurological development that starts in the womb.

  • @LackadaisicalE Actually gays can reproduce gays if they reproduce at all (suprisingly a lot do). It maybe highly unlikely but it can happen. I said or it could be a combination of multiple genes. Some research indicates quite a few plausible reasons. Nothing is set in stone. I know many ways it is speculated to originate. I believe it is reasonable to say nature is fine with it. Which is what I said I didn't use "ok" so no need for the quotes :) Science has also speculated of the evol. value

  • @flame0731 yes I agree, noone actually knows. One thing tho, I have always postulated that there might be an evolutionary value to gays in human society, emphasizing soft values and all that, but I need to find a good reason for their evolutionary value amongst say Dolphins or Canary birds or Cats to justify that scientifically lol still, much like stupidity and heartlessness, I refuse to believe anything "survives" for thousands of years wo evol. value.

  • @LackadaisicalE Emphasizing soft values? Thats an opinion

    It's survived since the sumarians so it has obviously been around for quit a while. Mayans did it too.

  • @flame0731 lack of kind strong masculine fatherly love and acceptance causes men to project that want another another men. Fathers please give tender kind strong hugs and spend manly time with your sons. That is how their sexual identity and masculine identity is formed. And same for women. main reason for homosexuality.

  • @wakeus777 how can I listen to someone who's logic makes them believe in some ghost in the sky LMAO. Oh btw gays reproduce dumbass. Romans had gay sex but still had kids. Say the whole world was gay ( though I do not wish it so) opposite sexes could copulate and then go back to their relationships. God your dumb. You don't need to be straight to fuck a chick. Or vis versa. The brain is a powerful thing. Logic, and nature tell you to stfu and educate yourself

  • Respond to this video... My point is, you obviously dont know your history so its even more apparent you do not know the true history of the womens rights movement. Funded by the banking dynasties of Rockefeller and such at the turn of the century in the late 1890s and early 1900's to do 3 things: 1) create 2 taxable incomes ; 2)take the children out of parental influence and put them into the public school systems; 3) destroy the family unit. It is evil and you women are fallin for it

  • @jmitnick210 Lol tacitly? Um you can't just assume I imply anything. What I did was turn his logic back on him. Now yes men do inflict suffering upon themselves in that context because they are allowing the women to look down on them yet don't reciprocate.In some situation the victim is not to blame, but when the victim is the main advocate for their own demise, then of course they are to blame. If a women was demanding rape then yes she is to blame if she get's raped. Don't twist it asshole

  • @flame0731 And actually women go out in these things they call clothes but really they are dressed in nothing more than skank attire... so they are the victims who are " the main advocate for their own demise." and they ask to get raped in that sense. How do I compare it to men? EZ! If you wore the wrong color in a certain neighborhood you can get killed and Men being mostly gang members are aware of this. so if you knew you were in the neighborhood at the wrong time, thats ur fault

  • @wakeus777 Women wear "skank attire" because men are easy to control with it. men could dress "skanky" if they were more sexualized than women are (who does the sexualization? MEN)

    Rape is not based off attraction. Or exposed skin stupid. Male psychologists have even said so if that helps. It's about power over someone. Wow you're ignorance is astounding. So if a man in a business suite was raped by a women with a strap on. Was he asking for it? Not really. Your comparison is EPIC FAILURE

  • @flame0731 I cant believe you guys have been arguing about this for 3 months. Kinda scary to be honest.

  • @jed52 Yeah I'm borderline about to give up. He's to indoctrinated into his controlling mindset

  • @jed52 I just jumped in & saw this the other day and I cant believe YOU actually came back to argue. Terrible job at it also. My kid does a better job at logical thinking and the application thereof. So spare us your panty cramp talk and leave. nobodys forcing your nasty fat fingers to type.. So isnt that you "being the advocate for your own demise.??"" your such a pine tree. Go play with urself or somethin. You feminists are all the same: ALL EMOTIONS NO LOGIC. lets not hear ur bs rhetoric.

  • @wakeus777 I use nothing but logic

  • @flame0731 Gender roles doesn't create sexism. That's a lie. Each group had strengths and weaknesses so we did what was in our nature. Now women don't even value their kids, they're gaining weight and becoming obese, they're becoming more violent, failing in school, etc. Men and boys are failing while girls are succeeding and the NOW or any other fake liberal organization does nothing to address it or even sees it a s a problem to begin with. FEMINISM=SEXISM ! PERIOD !!!!!!!!!!

  • @YoungnRomantic Um....no it's so much the truth even god would smite you for calling it a lie. Gender roles existed when we were hunters and gatherers. Do you know what that means you uneducated piece of shit? (you attack my family then I get pissed). It means that now that we've evolved to sentient beings and are capable of doing without the roles. THERE IS NO NEED FOR THEM.

  • @flame0731 No he wouldn't. If ur a religious person, u would know that all religions forbid homosexuality and for women to have certain roles. Its not sexist for men to want those same things from women as they did in the past. Feminism is sexism. Women don't know how to even take compliments these days, be respectful, carry themselves as ladies, don't know how to dress, treat their children, or even want to be mothers. They think its a liberal thing to do by murdering their own children.

  • @YoungnRomantic All religions forbid and support a lot of things. Muslims hate homosexuality but if a women crys rape she is required to have I believe 10 or so male witnesses. Christianity says homosexuality is bad yet it also says you can stone someone for wearing two clothes of a different shade, or planting two different crops next to each other. Or that if a man rapes a women she must marry him but if a women rapes a man she must be stoned. Shellfish is an abomination. etc Etc.

  • @YoungnRomantic So if you really believe that those days were the perfect days for women. That proves your a chauvinist. If a women is raped by a man she must marry him but if she were to do the same she would be put to death how can that be correct and right for men to want women to live that way? Oh and btw the bible was written by men most religious book were written by men. The god I believe in loves all. There are 20,000 denominations so it's irrelevent. Men like you =sexist.

  • @YoungnRomantic Men don't know how to give compliments without being horn dogs, or be respectful (i/e baby a condom doesn't feel good but if you get pregnant I'll leave), carry themselves as men and not be homophobic pussy bitches like you. They don't know how to dress (metrosexuals do, they were very nice suites and pants but still look like men. You dress in filth. Men don't know how to treat their children I mean there are more absent fathers,men don't want to fathers. Abortion is not murder

  • @YoungnRomantic Here you are with another sexist statement "women don't even value their kids"......yeah that's a load of bull. Um there are more single mothers than fathers...hmmm that means men are the ones that don't value their kids. Kids are overweight because of both genders, they are violent because of men (men are the more violent of the genders, science says so). Men and boys have nothing to do with feminism. Girls succeed because well...they are abolishing GENDER ROLES.

  • @YoungnRomantic youngnRomantic= chauvinistic, sexist, misogynist pig!!! PERIOD!!!!!!!!

    see what I did there? Yeah I told the truth

  • @flame0731 U didn't tell the truth about anything ! Ur just a leftist propaganda tool who doesn't want to realize that feminsm is sexism. The things that have come about in society since the inception of this stupid ideology have enslaved society and not made it better. Women have become worse mothers and wives, turned into hoes, think having baby daddies is a rights of passage, treat their children like disposable condoms.walking tax refunds, etc. Men don't do these things.

  • @YoungnRomantic Um...I'm not a leftist. The same goes to you though. You're a rightist propaganda tool who doesn't want to realize his view points are sexist. What the hell is wrong with you? We long ago moved past feminism. I've said it like 50 times that I don't like what feminism has turned into. Yet for some reason that goes over your head. Though the things that did come out of the ideology have made society better. I/e women are more willing to work.

  • @YoungnRomantic oh and another perfect example of you sexism. Still pointing out how women do wrong in all these things and standing by the stupid idea that men are saints. I have not ONCE heard you say anything negative about men. I on the other hand have pointed out negatives to both sexes. "women have become worse mothers/wives, they're hoes." Um women are better mothers because they are more efficient.

  • @YoungnRomantic oh and another perfect example of you sexism. Still pointing out how women do wrong in all these things and standing by the stupid idea that men are saints. I have not ONCE heard you say anything negative about men. I on the other hand have pointed out negatives to both sexes. "women have become worse mothers/wives, they're hoes." Um women are better mothers because they are more efficient.

  • @YoungnRomantic Now as wives....um just because they aren't home all fucking day taking care of the kids and then having dinner on the table by seven for your chauvinist ass. Or they don't as how high when you say jump does not make them bad wives. They are better wives because it's a team effort now. See here's my point. You don't even blame the "baby daddy" it's the women's fault. Sexist pig. Oh and women are hoes? Um I said earliy men are praised for the most sexual partners. Sexist sexist

  • @YoungnRomantic tax refunds? Um wtf is wrong with tax refunds? The founding fathers intended for there to be almost no federal taxes anyway so i don't see what's wrong with tax refunds. Men do do all those things. Even more so. Especially being the little sluts they are. But hey if your "brutha" came up to you and said "yo dude I banged some chick she's number 25" you'd be like hell yeah! But if a girl said that. well she's labeled as a hoe. I HEAR DOUBLE STANDARD AND SEXISM

  • @flame0731 Women are more sexist then men and use the media to portray this silly image of empowerment like Beyonce and other man hating artists, the television networks such as We, Oxygen, Lifetime and Lifetime Movie Network among others. Spike TV is a network catered to men and they don't have any misogynistic programming; it's just programming catered to a male audience. The same thing goes for Versus and SPEED. Women base their whole self esteem on the oppression of men anyways.

  • @YoungnRomantic Men are more sexist than women. You're a perfect example. Actually I take that back. I firmly believe you're just insane. Most men would agree with me over you. As would most women. So that just leaves you all alone. Even so. Men are more sexist. Um Beyonce is just showing women empowerment. How about you criticize male artist that's written a song about men being awesome. There's plenty out there you sexist ass

  • @YoungnRomantic What's wrong with women empowerment? should they have the mind set that they are beneath you? Is that what you're saying? Okay wome have WE, Oxygen and lifetime. Men have spike, speed, military channel. You're a panzy bitch if you think television is all taylored towards women. Hell Disney even subjects women. Spike tv does have misogynistic programming. IT also objectifies women. Manswers is a perfect example of the objectification

  • @YoungnRomantic Men base their whole self esteem on the oppression of women. Just like you said if a women works it's emasculating towards a man. Um...passive aggressive oppression is still oppression. Oh...If I don't get my way it's emasculating. PATHETIC!!

  • @flame0731 That's not true at all. Women are selfish and lesbian in nature today and if u ask any man, the truth that will be told is that today's woman is miserable, depressing, and makes u want to jump off a fucking cliff because she only cares about herself. The things that women did was all about supporting her family and now we have campaigns for obesity, children to exercise, etc. When women cooked for their kids and played with them in the yards and parks, these things didn't exist.

  • @YoungnRomantic Another sexist statement "women are selfish and lesbian" um men are selfish and pathetic, arrogant. Not all of them are chauvinistic, sexist, and mysoginistic like you but they are selfish and arrogant and what I said is true. Get over it. WHy do you keep saying ask any man. I know many men in my life and they all like my view point. Just talking to 10 people does not signifiy the whole population you dumb idiot

  • @YoungnRomantic And I bet the men you have spoken to that say that are only unhappy because they fit the description of the man I described. They want to oppress women so they use reverse psychology/ passive aggressive tactics such as "it's emasculating if you do that" bullshit. It's only emasculating because you lack selfesteem. You are fucking dumb as hell. Demographics and research say American's have always been fat. What caused greater weight gains was the industrial revolution

  • @YoungnRomantic Even then you're point is also invalid because um....why can't men cook? Oh wait you are selfish in the sense that you don't think they should. Selfish sexist piece of shit.

  • @YoungnRomantic Oh and btw women still do these things with their children. Men haven't and still don't. Because "it's not there job" your words not mine.

  • @flame0731 Women don't take care of their kids because they're too busy chasing a career and being the envy of their girlfriends for that. Men are much better parents and don't treat them as if they're disposable like condoms. Only women do that.

  • @YoungnRomantic Um........men have always been the worker. You even said that's their role? So um with the women working now obviously that means the women used to be good parent's but men have ALWAYS been bad parents. Lol you are a chauvinist because here you are still saying "women bad bad bad". You still say men can do no wrong. Pathetic asshole. I'm right you're wrong. Women are better parents then men. Men do treat them like disposable condoms Absent fathers45% - absent mothers 15% hahaha)

  • @YoungnRomantic so um "only women do that"......it seems women don't do that at all. They are better men than men. They work and do the "bullshit women role" go fuck yourself you sexist piece of shit. Men are horrible parent's in comparison with mothers. Why do you think most kids say they like mommy better? Obviously it's because hse nutrues while daddy works. Um....my point is valid that if a father does both he'll have a better relationship with the children. You're wrong I'm right, get oveit

  • @flame0731 Children don't love their mothers better than their fathers. That's a lie. As far as ur 2nd grade insult, I see that its clear that u can't hold a intelligent debate on anything that requires intellect. I see men doing a better job than wome taking care of and genuinely loving their kids while women mistreat their kids, abusing them, and using them to get money out of the system. Doesn't sound like a good mother to me. Kids to women today are tools for extortion. Feminism-Sexism

  • @YoungnRomantic lol you're hilarious. I have articulated myself and stated nothing but facts all throughtout our debate and you dare say that I am incapable of intelligent debate? You throw out random bits of information and call then fact when they are just opinions at best. You also twist words. Even now. You turned "like" into "love" Also, my insult wasn't an insult. It is a very true fact that children LIKE mommy better. I don't believe a child can love one parent more.

  • @YoungnRomantic On the intellect subject. You also believe in parnoid fantasies such as a homosexual agenda, etc. So how is that you are capable of an intelligent debate but I am not? Yeah.......I think you should look in the mirror and say that to yourself buddy.

    "I see men doing a better job than women........" - yeah no. WOmen don't use their kids to get money out of them. I don't really think men do either. You're just a chauvinist.

  • @flame0731 The gay agenda isn't paranoia, its a fact. If u studied it, u will see that its a part of population control because they don't reproduce. That's the whole point. I'm a chauvinist but u wouldn;'t dare criticize a woman for anything that they do. Go Figure ! The things that I mentioned about women abusing their kids, using them to extort money of government programs.counties, extortion of the father of those kids, etc is exactly what they do. U can't deny that !

  • @YoungnRomantic Um...no it is paranoia, and I have studied it, as well as I know at least 6 gay people 2 of which have life partners, and of course my gay friends know other gay people so....um yeah I know very well that there isn't a gay agenda. Lol you call me unintelligent yet you believe homosexuals do not reproduce. Actually many homosexual couples utilize either, surrogacy or for lesbians the donation of semen. So....they do reproduce. Another failed argument on your part.

  • @YoungnRomantic Lol again this proves your inability to debate because you are so vapid and consumed by your own issues. I have stated many a time the issues I have with women. I even made specific posts on the subject. Yet somehow you failed to read them so...um yeah you're still a chauvinist and I do dare to criticize women. The contrary is that you on the other hand dare call me a lesbian, among other things but you would never criticize men. Which you haven't this whole debate. Dumbass.

  • @YoungnRomantic the things you mentioned about women i can deny and I do deny. Not in all their entirety though. Yes women do abuse their kids, but guess what so do men. Men more often than not when compared with women endorse spanking w/ the belt, stick, hand, the list goes on. So um I'd like to point out that here I am saying women do commit child abuse, but you are stating it as if men don't. This proves you are a chauvinist while I am a humanist and see both sides.

  • @YoungnRomantic Now the "using them to extort money from the government" is teetering on being BS. Because in all honesty if a women is working but has 2 kids and because at some point in time she failed to take advantage of a chance to increase her income, what do you expect her to do? Just let her kids get taken from her? Oh wait know what a chauvinist like you would think. "She needs to get a man" which is completely ridiculous. It's not fair (continued)--->

  • @YoungnRomantic -->(continued) to say to young boys or young women, that they "must have a partner". Now when you say extortion of the father that is another example of your sexism, because as I explained perviously. The court laws say for the man to pay, why do they say so?, because people reaffirm the idea that the man must provide, which, funny story. YOU THINK SO TO. So umm look at that. Gender roles backfiring like they always do, and here you are complainging.

  • @YoungnRomantic You're a hypocrite, misogynist, chauvinist, ignorant, and incapable of debating because I would not be surprised if you twist something I have just said, or totally skip over it. I bet you won't even reply to this specific comment because you know I'm correc that you are hypocritical, you skip/ misread/alter what I say, and that you are a mysoginist because you do nothing but bad mouth women but never bad mouth men. unlike myself where I bash both sides.

  • @flame0731 U have no evidence to support that I'm a misogynist. I never said that I hate women. I don't agree with their hypocrisy and I'm exposing it. Ur only saying that because u love being a victim as a woman like u always do. I'm a man so criticizing women isn't the same thing as hating women. Women have caused alot of the family problems that are in existence today. I place blame where it belongs. U try to deny it and send out the PC Police because that's all leftists do. SMFH

  • @YoungnRomantic um do I have to repeat myself you idiot. YOUR POSTS ARE EVIDENCE ENOUGH. Like I said they have done nothing but slam on women while placing men on a pedestal. Now when did I ever say i was a victim? Being a victim would be if i was a stay at home mother and felt that was where all women belonged and no other place. You're the one playing victim you hypocrite. Poor men this, poor men that. HA!!

    You place the blame out of hypocrisy and indulgence. Along with ignorance fool.

  • @YoungnRomantic When did I ever mentioning anything about political correctness? How about I call you a fucking theiving nigger. Would that make you feel better you asshole. I bet it wouldn't because of couse it's only politically correct when it relates to you. I bet you call people spicks too. Oh and btw I don't need to try or attempt to do anything. I do nothing but achieve. Unlike yourself

  • @flame0731 Shows that u lack intelligence by slinging preschool insults. It also shows that u can't have a logical debate/argument because u resort to these tactics. U have no proof that I hate women. I'm a Anti Feminist not a misogynist. There is a difference. Look these terms up and read some books. I have stated the hypocrisy of the feminist movement from day one and its mission to break up families is one of the many reasons y I stand against it.

  • @YoungnRomantic Show's my lack of intelligence? again hypocritical. You started throwing insults out of nowhere. "political lesbian", "not a real women," my lists goes on so don't act all high and mighty. LIke I said you can't critisize my debate tactics when I'm simply dropping myself to your level. I mean you use pathetic arguments that hold no ground like "the homosexual agenda, ALL women are selfish blah blah" you basically start information that has no proof. You're the one that can'tdebate

  • @YoungnRomantic Now how many times do I have to say it. I have repeated myself 5 times now. Your hate for women is apparent by your views of them and how you assume so many things. I'm quoting you here just so you're aware "Women have caused a lot of the family problems, women beat their children (implying men don't), calling women that don't cook and clean and suck your dick when you demand political lesbians." There are countless other examples here on this video feed. So.um...I do have proof

  • @YoungnRomantic You keep saying "anti feminist not a mysoginist" okay look. You need to grasp this and hold on tight. WE HAVE NOT BEEN DISCUSSING FEMINISM FOR QUITE A WHILE. Yet you continue to bring it up as if it has any significance. I am well aware of the difference between the two and guess what. YOU"RE BOTH. You may have stated the hypocrisy of the feminist movement but there is hyprocrisy in your "traditional" values. As well as your gender roles. Also there is hypocrisy in you sexism

  • @YoungnRomantic How about you go read books and look up the term misogynist, sexist, chauvinistic, . Hypocrite. All of which you are. Don't dare criticize my name calling when you

    1. attacked me personally

    2. attacked my family

    3.claimed I would be divorced soon

    4. Called me a political lesbian

    5. A bitch

    So if I call you names. You're getting what's coming to you.

    Also name calling has nothing to do with presenting logic. I could say the sky is blue while calling you dumbass. Facts are facts

  • @flame0731 I'm not a misogynist and u have no eveidence to support that. U have also called me names so that point is irrelevant. I called u a political lesbian because that's what u are. Facts are facts b. Women don't know how to be women these days and that's y we as men see u and ur fellow manhaters as undesirable. This is also y I said that ur marriage wouldn't last. I don't criticize women and see criticism of men as sexism simply for the sake of being PC. Only women do that.

  • @YoungnRomantic Um......I just explained that your posts show that you think men are above women!!!!. Now you have to see why I call you an idiot. I mean that was the 5th time i explained it yet it still went over your head. Also the name calling thing. YOU STARTED IT. Really? Really? Have you forgotten you were the first to sling the mudd? You're arrogant too apparently. The point is relevant because you just said I can't debate simply because I call names. Which is what you do too, so......

  • @YoungnRomantic ""I called you a political lesbian because that's what you are---hmmm well I called you a misogynist, chauvinist, arrogant, sexist hypocrite because that's what you are. That pathetic explanation goes both ways honey.

    Women don't know how to be women these days? The women you want is an obedient, suck-my-dick when i want, weak women. Women now and days are more women than they ever were. The issue is that men like you can't handle it that they have to grow up

  • @YoungnRomantic Okay agian I'm going to point out why I call you a fucking idiot. Emphasis on FUCKING IDIOT. It's okay for you to call me a man hater, although if you think my proof for your misogyny isn't valid. That's pretty hypocritical. I'm not a man hater. I have said nothing thought out this video feed that substantiates it. (that's debate) I'd like you to quote me or else stop saying it. Besides I'm MARRIED TO A MAN. I obviously don't hate them. Or really dislike them in any way.

  • @YoungnRomantic Here I'll act like you lol

    There's a diffrence between not just wanting to be susie homemaker and wanting to have a job and hating men.

    There's a difference between not wanting to submit to gender roles which I feel are sexist towards men even though they don't see it and hating men

    there is a difference between wanting equality across the board (which is what I want, you on the other hand like the dichotomy of inequality) and hating men. Get it? Got it? Good!!

  • @YoungnRomantic Plenty of men see me as desireable and they aren't "weak men" as you would call them. they are actually turned on by the idea that I don't need their help but will gladly take it. As should be the case with any man or women. Hell I changed my tire when I got my first flat while dating my husband and he jumped my bones after simply finding out i didn't call him like other weak women would. So um don't state information as if you know it to be true for the whole male population

  • @YoungnRomantic You also can't say my marriage won't last when I've been married for 13 yrs. That's a significant amount of time. It's also been happy. My husband and I rarely fight. Now why is that? Well it's because we don't subject ourselves to gender roles. My marriage will last. Don't project your unhappy life onto mine. Obviously no women will like a man with your views. Not because they hate men, but because your views imply women are inferior to men

  • @YoungnRomantic "I don't criticize women and see criticism of men as sexism for the sake of being politically correct. only women do that"

    actually no. Women don't. You see, the "criticism" you present is not in fact criticism, just sexist blither. "women beat their children (implying men don't), women use the government (implying men don't),

    Or even the above quote iteself " I don't criticize women......only women do that" is sexist because men actually do that to. Not ONLY women. Sexistpig

  • @flame0731 U are a typical feminist hypocrite. Any criticism of women is considered sexism and misogynistic while its open season on the men and its seen as liberating. That's how u leftists work. I'm not buying it. I'm not sexist at all. I just give criticism where its rightfully due and ur doing exactly what I said u would do, which is call the PC Police. Women are misnadric as hell in this country and u know it so don't get mad at a man like me who's got balls to tell u about urself !!!!!!!!!

  • @YoungnRomantic I'm a typical feminist hypocrite? Did I say ANY criticism of women is sexism? You're still being a typical dumbass and twisting my words. I said your stupid annalogies and false facts are what is sexist. I'll repeat myself (funny how women everywhere have to do this for men)-----READ READ READ. My god it's not that difficult

  • @YoungnRomantic Did I ever say it was open season on men? You keep putting words in my mouth to supplement what you falsely believe about both women AND men. I mean really? You think you should be allowed to say women are the only gender that beat children? Wow you're arrogant too! YOu give false criticism. You are not giving criticism where it belongs. You're just putting blame on women, women alone. That's where it is sexist because only I have said both sexes are at fault. arrogantHypocrtie

  • @YoungnRomantic "You're doing exactly what I said you would do"- Um do you know what political correctness is? In no way am I calling the PC police. I find it funny how right-wing nut jobs bitch about political correctness when in debates. So pathetic. You're failing so you resort to whining about that. See here you are criticizing women and women alone. "women are misandric as hell............tell you about yourself" Um again I've been married 13yrs so I don't hate men.

  • @YoungnRomantic 2. Lol you're still being hypocritical. Men in this country are sexist and overbearing arrogant jerks who believe in fictional imasculating things. You say I shouldn't get mad!? HAHAHA I'm sorry sweetie but you should say that to yourself. Don't get made when a women like me has the ovaries to point out the flaws in your logic, your idiocy, your lies and your misogyny/sexism/chauvinism. I take back saying all men are sexist. It's just you. Women are not misandric (not a word btw

  • @flame0731 Look up the word misnadry in a dictionary. IT EXIST. Since u don't read, its defined as hatred of men. Me aren't jerks who beilive in emasculating things. Women encourage homosexuality not men. Wake up to reality b. Ur living in a dream world that doesn't exist. Ur false bravado proves that ur trying ur hardest to be the political lesbian that u r by trying to be masculine like me which can never be so enjoy ur clitoris and stop trying to have a penis. That's real HOMO B.

  • @YoungnRomantic look up the word misogynist in the dictionary. IT IS WHO YOU ARE!!! lmao. Don't tell me to learn definitions when clearly you don't know them when they are applicable to your personality. Since I don't read? Um how many time in this whole debate have you "misread" my words? Oh btw I know what the hatred of men is. Um...like I said women don't practice it. IF anything they manipulate the situations that men put themselves in to their advantage. Which is still wrong. But (cont)

  • @YoungnRomantic like I said. A lot of the issues stem from men themselves. See even now you misread what I said even though it was very clear. I said men are jerks that believe, say...a women tells them to come shopping with her. OH NO. That's emasculating!. That's i what I was describing. Dumbass. Men and women both encourage homosexuality. Or rather acceptance of it. How about you wake of from your sexist mindset. It's really annoying. The sand man gave you too much. haha

  • @YoungnRomantic "your false bravado"--Funny thing is I said basically the same thing to you. Can't come up with your own ideas?? I said your false ideals prove you are trying your hardest to be a chauvinistic, misogynistic imbecile. Um I'm not a political lesbian. Funny how you continue to adamantly claim I'm a political lesbian yet continue to deny what I adamantly claim you are. M-I-S-O-G-Y-N-I-S-T. Oh I love my clit. Hell my orgasm is better. Oh and I don't need to be masculine to win.

    

  • @YoungnRomantic men give women whatever they want. It's really quite funny. Why do women get promoted faster? Well because men are easily to manipulate. Why are they easy to manipulate? Because they have this fixation, like you do, in gender roles. Which in the end is how they recieve the lesser end of the deal. Which I find offensive. It should not be that way. Then again you're the one that likes it like that.

  • @flame0731 Women who consider being homosexual as progressive need to see some counseling. Secondly, men don't promote feministic agendas because we're philosophers/thinkers and have always been at the forefront of society in terms of making its decisions so to say that men don't get promoted faster than women do is ridiculous. Men aren't easy to manipulate and the fact that u imply that shows women earn their way to the top and that u have to earn it by sleeping with ur boss or other means.

  • @YoungnRomantic Except psychology is the one that says it's perfectly normal so.....counseling isn't necessary. Do you know who the MRAs are? They exist because women do get promotions faster than men. RESEARCH. Men have not been at the forefront of society because they are philosophers/thinkers. (btw this is just an example of your misogyny. Here you are praising men as god like). They are at the forefront because they used to be seen as above women fool.

  • @YoungnRomantic Um me saying men are easy to manipulate does not mean women sleep their way to the top. YOU assume that because you are a sexit/chauvinist/misogynistic pig and automatically create the worst possible reality for women. In reality science says women are better at math and science. MEn are easy to manipulate. Like I said with gender roles. Like in modern day. Women have the option to work or stay home. Guess what. Men don't. Why don't they? Because men like you are fixated on

  • @flame0731 Thatis is feministic propaganda. Men have always been better at math and science compared to women. Several studies have shown that. U stated that women manipulate men for to their advantage but that doesn't make me a sexist person. Ur a typical woman who can't take criticism so u just send out the PC Police to shut me me up but u have lost that battle because I won't be quiet. Besides, I like destroying fake liberals who are misandric hypocrites who claim to be ''about equality''

  • @YoungnRomantic o my god. What makes you sexist is assuming women sleep around idiot. I mean really? how could you miss that? Also that is not propaganda. I sent you a link with an article on a study done. just one example. "you haven't lost that battle" Um first of all me telling your statement is sexist isn't the PC police it has to do with that you automatically said that me saying women CAN manipulate men means the have sex with them. That's extrememe

  • @YoungnRomantic gender roles. Men are also manipulated into having sex being a controlling factor. If a married women denies her husband sex or even any women denies a man sex. He wants it so badly he bends to her will. Grow some balls and don't have sex be such a priority. IT isn't women. Why isn't it for women you ask? Well according to scientific study (probably beyond your scope of understanding) the biological make up of women doesn't demand it.

  • @YoungnRomantic women get to the top just as men do. By working hard. If not harder because your statement proves they have something to prove. That they earn it by blood, sweat, and tears so to speak (that's a cliche just so you know and don't go off on some rant focused on it like you normally do)

  • @flame0731 The fact of the matter is that women don't get promoted through working hard but sleeping around in the example u gave. They even teach women today that sex is a way to empower urself. Men work hard because we believe in traditional values such as providing for our families and protecting them from harm. It doesn't change. Besides, women wouldn't be able to do the things that they do without a man creating the society in which u live so wake up and stop fooling urself.

  • @YoungnRomantic O my god you sexist asshole! Women don't sleep around to get to the top. You assuming so, or rather adamantly believing so is an example of your misogyny. Why would the MRAs (men's rights association) fight the pay gap, and promotion issues if women weren't getting paid more and promoted faster? The fact of the matter is that you are spewing a false fact. Sex is a way to empower oneself. Like I said earlier. men empower each other all the time "dude fuck more women you'll be cool

  • @YoungnRomantic "Dude, the more women you fuck, the more of a man you are" so um.....yeah it is a form of empowerment but that is in a negative use. If someone understands their sexuality it is empowering. For both men and women. Men work had because they are taught they should break their back. Um.......women would be able to do the things they do by building it for themselves (another example of your sexism. You assume women are incapable).