I agree with ron paul on this one. Dinesh good job but as someone that had family imediate family member killed in vietnam i would say yeah yes right along with the audience.
Why is the video moving so fast? Someone has adjusted the speed of the video, and it is very annoying. Makes it sound like both of em are on crack! But I do happen to agree more with Dr. Paul on this one. Good video!!!
this guy says the people that did 911 all all dead?!?!?! no their not you ignorant sheep....some if not all are still alive, and none were on the passenger lists..
In all seriousness... is the Ron Paul part of this on fast-forward of something? I've never in my life heard him speak so quickly in such a high pitched voice!
Islam "needs" to be destroyed because of their believes. In Iran if you're a foreign person you maximum can own 49% of a company. It's prohibited to charge interest.
These kind of things are disturbing multicorporations, banks, etc... Let's be honest guys.. capitalist system is working very well, but fiat currencies and fractional reserve banking system is wrecking everything...
@hosszuvagta you have no clue what your talking about.
Capitalism depends on fractional reserve banking. fiat currencies were needed to end the dollar shortage during bretton woods. Foreigners are blocked from investing directly into particular firms in most countries. Capital controls like this have lessened the dangers posed by mass capital flows. Ron paul forgets that the gold standard entails deflationary pressures and does not favor expanionary spending at all.
All of recorded history has been a struggle between Islam & the West. The Moorish Invasion, the Islamic attacks in the Holy Land which started the crusades, the FACT that if Islam had not been stopped at Constantinople there would be no Western society..
Your polemic of man caused disaster, WWilson, & the US policy=enemy.. ugh. Islam sided w the Nazi's BECAUSE THEY KILL JEWS - long BEFORE WW, League o'Nations, &Israel. Want more expensive v Iraq?
@mredstriumph hahahaha where are you getting your information buddy? the muslims sided with nazis to kill jews. wow you have no idea about history. please stop. the muslims sided with nazis because they had no choice. the jews will living peacefully with arabs and christians in jerusalem before the creation of israel. so try backing up your conspiracy theories next time. read up on how the persians helped the polish refugees in WW2. oh and can you write in sentences next time.
Paul's cause and effect is totally warped, he does not understand the nuances and goals of our foreign policy, does not understand the energy situation, the dangers of a nuclear world, the remilization of our allies that will occur when the US withdraws from the world, the ramifications thereof, the demographics of the Islamic expansion, their objection to our culture, the goals & strategy of militant Islam, nor the strengths and weakenesses of the American position
@mredstriumph that was nothing but rhetoric, paul has got history on his side. islam is bad but now we are making it look better. also another thing, you can be as idealistic as you want however WE HAVE NO MONEY. this war is driving us further into debt. WE ARE LIMITED BY OUR RESOURCES. get real.
What history do u imagine ur talking about? 9/11 (cost to US economy >$2.1Tn -40,000 lives if not for the bravest & most capable 1st responders in the world) Noticed our inability in dealing with nuculear states like N Korea & Pakistan? Realize US developed nukes in the 1940's w sliderules & no template? Realize that the ONLY reason states like Holland, Spain, Greece, Mexico, Turkey etc aren't nuculear is US hegemony? Have u ever even heard the term Pax Romana?
@mredstriumph actually 9/11 cost 2,976 lives, I dont know where you got 40,000 from. no im very aware of europe bloodshed history, i have no idea what it has to do with anything. operation ajax is good example of the ramifications of us intervention, it wasnt like this before. energy policy? what has that got to with anything.
On a typical weekday 50,000 people worked in the towers with another 200,000 passing through as visitors. The Two World Trade Center's observation deck alone received an estimated 80,000 visitors a day.
The 9/11 attacks, like the '93 attack, were planned to take place when the towers were at maximum capacity and were an attempt to kill everyone in that building. That only 2976 were killed is a miracle & a testament to the first responders who gave their lives to save them.
@mredstriumph so you admit you were wrong and that 2796 people was the actual number of people dead. well thats a start.
i'm not for isolationism, so i will ignore that strawman.
so you are saying in the future they will attack us. i recognise that eventually they can reach us but if he they do the USA will pound them to the ground. there will be no iran left to speak of.
Source: Darton, Eric (1999). Divided We Stand: A Biography of New York's World Trade Center. Basic Books. ISBN 0465017274
And the reason energy policy matters is because the isolationism, world abandonment, & the loss of US Hedgemony which you are advocating have untold economic & societal costs which you can't even begin to imagine - in large part due to your misguided ignorance & perverse inflexible determination not to actually know or understand what's going on.
@mredstriumph the fact that you cant recognise the parallels between what the afghans did to the russians and what the afghans are doing to us is nothing short of amazing. the economy is the most important thing in a country.
The truth this disengenous argument ignores is that the REAL cause of the Soviet collapse was it's command&control economy, innefficiency, & * Centralized planning * - NOT Afghanistan - SHOCK - its the very same welfare state Ponzi scheme policies - Medicare, SS, unionized government pensions, HUD, & entitlement - punishing hard work, responsibility, savings; Rewarding ignorance, dependency, & failure - that is bankrupting the US today - NOT our foreign policy. Run the numbers
In your pre-pubescent 15 minute world view, Europe - the very best 1st world lot re: Freedom, stability, etc. are "civilized". It ignores completely that their history is one of NON-STOP bloodshed & violence from the fall of the Pax Romana right up until WW2. These most educated & civilized (sincere) ppl produced not one, but TWO of the most EXPENSIVE & horrific bloodbaths in human (& US) history in just the past 100 years. You clearly have NO concept about energy policy
@mredstriumph hahaha are you talking about the rocket of worms he sent to space, what danger is that going to cause to space? their is no ramification to our economy from worms in a rocket. i dont know what the rocket has to do with an EMP pulse. you are just full of non sequiturs. in your incoherent rambling i dont think you have the first idea what you are talking about.
That you won't or aren't capable of drawing a connection between the achievement of orbital space flight, and an evolving inter-continental threat by a soon to be nuclear Islamic fundamentalist regime is the heart of the problem.
That u believe u can hide behind oceans, renig on treaties, cause the world to re-arm, allow rampant nuclear proliferation in every corner of the globe, & call the result "economically wise" is nothing short of hubris.
@mredstriumph if people cant feed themselves then i thought they give two shit about some muslim extremists. the hunger will get them before the islamice terrorists do. do you want another great depression living off ketchup sandwiches. your mentality is a real threat to the country's well being.
Do you realize Ahmadinejad has now launched SEVERAL Kavoshgar-3 rockets & sattelites into space? Realize the danger of intentional flak & debris into orbit, the hazard it poses & the present technical impossibility it poses to remove it? The ramification to our economy & society, or even know what an EMP pulse is? This is based soley on PUBLIC information. N Korea? Venezuela (guess where Uranium is mined?), Cuba? If when we abandon our allies, relative stability is gone & EVERYONE remilitarizes
@mredstriumph all of recorded history has been a struggle between west and the west meaning internal wars in europe. so what is your point? also try structuring your ramblings, you are very incoherent.
"All of recorded history has been a struggle between west & the west meaning internal wars in europe."
The US was drawn into WW1 Europe & withdrew. Not 50 years later, during the height of isolationism we were attacked, & forced to fight a far costlier war - but this time we did NOT withdraw, & as result, the world, including the US, has largely lived in peace.
@mredstriumph are you talking about WW2? what about vietnam where we did leave and they are living in peace and we are trading with them. the world has not largely lived in peace since WW2. There was the cold war, the cuban missile crisis, the bay of pigs, vietnam, the korean war, the iraq war, the iraq bombings, the afghan war, the iran iraq war, the gulf war etc... lol some peace.
oh by the way thanks for ignoring all my other points, i'll take that as a concession on your part.
This is a contrived argument intended to deny knowing that there has been NO war or armed aggression in any place where there is an established US military base (the topic of discussion), deny that in every case, the nations involved have demilitarized, stabilized, expanded personal freedom, & to deny that the dividends of the policy of engagement are a 70 year period of peace, prosperity, mutually beneficial trade, & economic development unparalleled in human history.
@mredstriumph@mredstriumph im glad you recognize the shit you were spewing before was ridiculous. now if you want to rephrase what you said and say that "there has been no war in any place where there is a US military base" then i would agree with you because the military base is already there. your point was that the world has been safer since the US intervened in WW2 and that is such an obvious lie.
oh ya the interference in iran in 1953 led to such freedom with a dictator followed by muslim
Re: "I'm glad you recognize", "so you admit", "take as a concession", "so you concede", etc etc etc
Are u really so starved for validation that u need to persist in this silly sham tactic? At what point do u realize that a person can disagree with a point of view - even argue against it, without exploding into insult, expletive, & desperate rhetorical nonsense u think wins "points".. alternately wailing "straw men", non sequitur! then attacking w space worms & f#$k. Just sad
Every conflict u listed, in fact, was NOT within the US sphere of trade & influence.
In each, the aggressor was the same * 19th century centrally-planned totalitarianism * spreading through force, conquest, & collectivist revolution - enslaving, expropriating, torturing & murdering at even greater scale than that of WW2.
It was stopped without bloodshed in Europe; US; USSR; - w.o. nuclear warfare - & ended through economics @ consider less loss of life&treasure vs WW1&2
@mredstriumph i think most of the conflicts i listed where within the US influence. the iraq war was a war of aggression against a sovereign country. same with afghanistan. they supported iraq in the iran iraq conflict. so i would say you are wrong. but that wasnt your point was it? the world hasnt been safer since the intervention in WW2.
oh dont get me started on the commies, their foreign policy was way worse than the americans post woodrow wilson. they had a proper soviet empire.
The truth this disengenous argument ignores is that the REAL cause of the Soviet collapse was it's command&control economy, innefficiency, & * Centralized planning * - NOT Afghanistan - SHOCK - its the very same welfare state Ponzi scheme policies - Medicare, SS, unionized government pensions, HUD, & entitlement - punishing hard work, responsibility, savings; Rewarding ignorance, dependency, & failure - that is bankrupting the US today - NOT our foreign policy. Run the numbers
@mredstriumph what the fuck are you on about? the massive majority of the soviets spending was in the military including the draining decade in afghanistan which is a major reason why they left. everyone knows their central economic plan was a disaster and led to mass starvation way before 1989 but the military spending was the straw that broke the camels back. the commies have done way worse than the americans ever have done.
I realize nothing I can say/do will persuade u to STUDY history, & I recognize ur adherance to '08 election cycle propaganda & its slavish cartooned characterizations precludes ur understanding - or even hearing - what I'm saying, but pause a moment & indulge me:
/watch?v=cwNgNyiXPLk
/watch?v=WeBtdwPpTQM
/watch?v=6w6gf3tSGTg
Parts 17a,b,c of a much larger (vital) "Crash Course" linking energy & economics
U think this is about Ron Paul, but ur in the dark
@mredstriumph no because you havent mentioned anything historically relevant, and spent a good deal of your time ranting about space worms. im very aware thank you very much. actually my main reason for being against the war is the debt crisis we face. even if you do believe in the crap you have been spewing we dont have any money and our resources are stretched to the limit. we cant carry on. the afghans drained the soviets for 10 years and they will drain us as well. there is history.
@PresidentRich I almost thought the video was speeding up. I think his mind works fast and he has to intentionally speak slowly when he's in mainstream media.
D'Souza needs to remember his identity and who he is, why doesnt he go back to India and then we'll see if he still supports the globalized free and democratic america
I don't know who did it but the Ron Paul section of this video is accelerated... probably to make him sound funny. Shame on these subliminal tecniques. Liberty will pervail!
American govt been playing hero, barging into another country trying to put a stop to war which they only made escalate even more.
What does he think give America the right to be the judge other country of wrong doing. While American corporation went into other countries and exploit their natural resources and enslave their nations.
The problem lies with over-inflated sense of ego in Washington coupled with Inquisition "righteous" fury.
Alright. Wow. D'Souza and Paul were definitely the two best debaters. The pro-war side was better than the anti-war side simply because the pro-war side, both of the guys were sane. Paul's colleague, the anarchist/atheist "Flush religion down the toilet" guy sounds like a babbling anti-war protester.
Overall...hmmm....I think Paul won because for terrorism, the evidence seemed to be on his side: Pape, and Schuerer. Thepro-war side could only guess why they attacked us.
Agreed. There's a better war hawk stance that is more in line with moderation and the military, but since this is the intellectual world they get some civilians to come out and blabber about what they think about grand geopolitics and bullshit.
They should get Nate Fick and Bing West to debate... they'd kick Paul's ass.
This clown makes jokes about Bush and Hitler and expects people to buy into all the rest of the garbage he mixes in with his jokes. His arguments are specious, frivolous, without foundation and without merit. I rest my case on the joker. Then Ron Paul comes up there and the smoke clears and things are clear and concise again. Awesome Ron.
How did the Bible know that beheading would be the Muslim's calling card? See Revelations 20:4
How did the Bible know that there only needed to be one false prophet? See Revelations 13:18 "Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding number the multitude of the second beast for it is the multitude from one man and the multitude is in the name of allah."
If the airlines had slaughtered Muslims 9/11 would not have happened. If we treated Muslim men as dogs (they behead people for fun) they'd think twice about splashing acid on preteen girls and shooting 100 rockets on Israel on Christmas Eve and Christmas day 2008.
you're a fool. "our" way usually kills and maims just as much, or more, innocent people than enemies. our way is militarily, and only militarily, simply because war is an industry. our "solutions" to moral problems only add death and destruction and costs our own economy dearly. war always creates unintended consequences, that usually lead to more war. the US has supported atrocities and installed dictators in the past. the US is also immoral. we're just better at covering it up..
these wars aren't about humanity. they're about money. war generates some of the highest profits of anything. the flag follows the dollar, the soldiers follow the flag, and the country follows the soldier. look up Major General Smedley Butler. he was in active duty for 34+ years, and the most decorated solider in history. when he got back home, he gave a famous speech called "war is a racket"..it benefits the few at the expense of the many.
You're so right itzahazylife. Lay down & die before any enemy for America is so wicked to drop bombs & supplies on a nation at the same time & rebuild any nation it attacks.
Let's accept Sharia courts so that Muslim men in America can abuse their wives in democratic countries too & make terrorists right in our country.
I think Dinesh D'souza has said America works for its' interests. Why not? So does everyone else.
america works for its interests at the expense of the wars we're so addicted to. and it's not "our" interests, it's a select few that reap the benefits. the poor and middle class are damaged by these wars, not benefited. we preach one thing to our people, and do another. we're one big facade. and this is okay because other nations partake in this deception?..we're america. we're supposed to be the benchmark for what is good and moral. we're just an empire lusting for power. and that's not ok.
If anyone asked, "What about Osama or Afganistan?"
We could say, "What of him? The moment he does anything his family's home nation will be gone. Let him have Afganistan & if he thinks he can better it after Russia had its way with it then have at it.
I don't think North Korea would have announced WMDs, nor would anyone want to screw with us.
So response democracy for Iraq and Iran gone from the planet with no resources used on it other than weapons.
it all comes down to 2 things..humilty, or dominion..we choose dominion..u can either believe dominance will keep us secure, or humilty will keep us secure. well, since most of our problems come from the pursuit of dominance, humilty is the path our foreign policy needs to take.
Psalms 51:17 sounds great for policy on looking at yourselves individually.
Being humble on our knees with our heads hitting the dirt at the feet of the Imam's is idiotic.
Later itzahazylife.
The Muslim needs to get angry about Muslims splashing acid on preteen girls for going to school or refusing to offer their bodies for sex. If they don't seek justice then we should give it to them our way.
Remove all soldiers from the penninsula, but declare war on Saudia Arabia. Again a double minded man is unstable in all his ways.
We should have attacked Iraq straight out & then bombed Iran off the map killing any living thing that tried to leave the premises.
When asked why we did either action we should have said, "We will do what we will & any further attack on America by the Middle East will eliminate the existance of Saudia Arabia from the world."
ron paul never said we should have declared war on saudi arabia. he said if we HAD to declare war on someone, it should have been saudi arabia, since mostly all of the terrorists came from there.
and u know a good way to get them to leave us alone?..by NOT having an aggressive foreign policy. we stick our snouts in the hornets nest, get stung, and vow revenge. we have 761 bases in 150 countries..we spend almost as much on our military as the rest of the world combined. (cont)
America likely should have fought WWI and WWII & then got out of war until someone pleaded for us to come in & we should have put a huge bill on both nations after each & every war afterwards.
Still Dinesh is wrong that we as Americans must fight for freedom everywhere relative to nations, but we should do whatever we need to get them to leave us alone.
we have a military industrial complex running full swing in the US..we find any reason to involve ourselves. then when we do, we end up instilling hate. then to solve that problem, we use more military force and more war. it's asinine. it's ALL because of our interventionism in the name of "spreading morality"..but rather than back the hell out, and walk away from it all, u suggest that we wipe these nations off of the planet so we can continue staying on the path of our current foreign policy?
Ron Paul was really talking fast, but he has the greater point - Saudi Arabia is responsible for 9/11. If anything, we should have gone to war with Saudi Arabia. Not that it would have made a difference in the "strategery."
Wow! Dinesh knocked that out of the Park. Based on his previous performance I didn't think he had it in him. I did enjoy his book "What's so Great about America?" It's a good read, but not too flashy. "Illiberal Education" is vastly superior and I recommend it to anyone who feels the American Left has even a little too much influence in College.
I really Dislike D'Souza. He refuses to debate anyone on there own home turf, and says the same things in every debate. Literally, word for word, the same things. Like he is reading a speech. Even down to his Mosquito joke, which he also used while debating Hitchens.
Osama Bin Laden knew he couldn't destroy the U.S. externally, so he is bankrupting us, his plan is succeeding and by trying to occupy practicallyh the whole middle east in an effort to promote freedom? Wheres the economic freedom and civil freedom in paying for a war, and making our troops go over there when they are constitutionally suppose to defend our coountry, not invade and occupy others.
Hey Dude, enlist,get your tin pot and gun,,ill sit here eat and drink get fat, dream about Britney Spears, and ill be rooting for you to shoot some Jihadists,,
Mr. D'souza is a bit of an ignorant man. He believes that we should invade -whole- countries because they are all supposedly fanatics? Attack Iran with this same backwards *** logic instead of targeting radical groups with special ops teams, and we will ignite a far more devious conflict than both Afghanistan and Iraq wars combined. Imagine what money and mobilization would be required to fight these kinds of war. I sense blood in shark filled waters in the next few decades with...(cont.)
Christians did nothing when Clinton/Albright attacked Christian Serbia. The media lies which preceded it weren't countered by christian support. Now in Bosnia, Kosovo and Albania we have jihadi nut jobs running the place. I won't forgive America for that, never mind the muslims you have alienated many Europeans over that episode.....I'm a Brit by the way not Serbian.
Jihdai nut jobs? What do you know about FY politics?
The conflict between Serbs and Albanians in Kosovo is as much one of ethnicity and language as one of religion. That's what makes the case of the Serbian minority in Kosovo so important; it's not that they are faced with Jihadis, but ethnic supremacists who want a Greater Albania state.
Humans only seem to have rights when it fits the agendas of the powerful. Their friends in Turkey aren't oppressing Kurds...oh no. That isn't reported so it doesn't happen. Macedonians aren't being attacked by albo's..because it isn't reported. If they don't report it, it never happened. If they do, then it must have.
The conflict in Macedonia is ongoing...the same albanian narco-terrorist-sex-traffickers are now expanding south and their murder campaigns go unreported by Western 'human rights' voices.
Only 'ethnicity'? I don't think the desecration of Orthodox chruches could be thought of as completely devoid of any religious content....but I know what you mean. My partner is in politics in FY so I know a little.
That was the most awesome soundbite I have ever heard from Ron Paul you can see he was really passionate and meant it what he said. Even Barack Obama at his best could not have expressed himself as impressively as Ron Paul did there. Awesome. Ron Paul should be president!
I take that comment back.His IQ is way too low for this debate.Casey might as well go up on stage with a sighn that says I am an Anti American idiot who knows nothing of American history.
That Casey guy and former Canidate Ron Pual just proved how unintelligent they are in this debate.Casey stated some of the dumbest comments I have ever heard.He doesnt even know history in the proper context.So Hitler and Stalin were trying to sighn a peace treaty with the jews?Not just Nazi Germany and not just Stalin in Russia.The jews are the most percicuted and hated race in the world.Sorry Casey you IQ is too low for this debate LOL.
I think he uses that mosquito in the nudist colony in every debate...it's a good laugh-getting line. Gotta put a little humor in there why you speak publicly.
Are we going to let Osama bin Laden define our foreign policy by what he considers his holy land!? This is outrageous! Screw that, we'll bomb the hell out of these terrorists wherever they are, holy or not.
Osama bin Laden already defined your foreign policy, by dragging your asses out to Iraq and Afghanistan, making it for him a hell lot easier to kill you off and for him to recruit more fighters and get backing from more Muslims.
YES!! Ron Paul speaks the truth! Why can't these right wing neo-con nuts get any of the truth into their skulls? Why are they SO damn stubborn and bullheaded? Diplomacy is the way! Not antagonism and hostility.
Finn... those yer talking about grew up thinking being a bully was ok , probably now have a badge or a gov job with power and wouldnt support DrPaul on their best day..We wont convert everyone,,just the indocrinated that want deprogramming because they have a strong sense of what truth is..
Dinesh makes that stupid "mosquito in the nudist colony" comment in his debate with Hitchens as well. After saying it, he says nothing of value, in both debates.
Well at the moment India is one of the leading developing countries, and yes it has many fundamental problems in accordance to human rights, treatment of "undesirables", and especially women. Blaming India for spreading terrorism is a joke. You obviously have a good deal of hatred in you manifesting as prejudice towards India. Please LISTEN to the debate. Besides, D'Souza is an American. Your arguments are fanatical. Please think before you type.
If you're going to make assertions like that you require evidence. I'm not defending D'Souza. He's a douchebag. The Muslim "Bogeyman" is definitely bullshit, but militant Islam is a threat, but moreso to muslims. America could bomb the shit out of the middle east, but that would be wrong in so many ways. You make good points, and hating India as a nation and its government is one thing, but hating the people of India just because they are Indian is fuckin' stupid.
"smelly apu habibi" and "Most Indians (smelly dot heads)" don't help argument. Refuting an argument politely is more powerful than attacking with immature speech. Thank you for your comments, but I believe we can both agree that D'Souza is a scumbag, and yes some people from bronze age foreign countries can bring in that country's backward thinking and then merely disguise in a western appearance. He acts like an American but his message is remnant of bronze age, prejudiced, class-system India.
Please don't "educate" an Indian about Indians. The problem isn't them being Indian, and please refrain from racial slander, but I'll assume you're referring to Hindu Indians. Socialism is better than fascism. If you have a point to make it is self defeating if it is based on racism as no one will take you seriously. You sound like a 5-year-old, or the stereotypical, angry, sexually-repressed Islamic male.
"what about all of the hundreds of thousands of people coming out of the medrassas and the mosques signing up for jihad" GOOOD QUESTION! Your answer Mr. D'Souza?: "KILL THEM ALL!!"
WW1&2 were both banker setups, as well as the Bolshevic revolution.
See Murray Rothbard's "Wall Street, Banks and American Foreign Policy" for the painstakenly researched account that enumerates Joe Kennedy's statement "Fifty men run America, & thats a high figure"
D'Souza says that the US did not sell weapons of mass destruction, and then in the same sentence says the US did. Completely contracdictory. He's obviously a tinge confused. Aside from distortions, he only speaks of ideology and rebukes facts and true history. If you speak of liberty and ideology, how can you apply that to "siding with the bad guy?"
I'm sick of the lowest common denometer comparison of World War II. World War II was a whole other ball of wax, was under completely different circumstances. People are misquoted and past history is redirected by using the ghost of Hitler and Stalin. It's a cop out and a stupid comparrison with little value other than emotional aggitation.
He also believes Christianity is the source of all goodness and likes to blame the inquisition that persecuted the jews on... wait for it... THE JEWS! Have you read his book, "The Enemy at Home", which points the finger at liberalism as the cause for 9/11? Knowing D'Souza doesn't make you an intellectual by proximity. It means more likely (especially if you like him; not saying you do) that you are a fan of inequal status for women, and are very close-minded.
Just once can we put americans first? Ron paul 2012.
cocoinfinity1 1 month ago
I agree with ron paul on this one. Dinesh good job but as someone that had family imediate family member killed in vietnam i would say yeah yes right along with the audience.
cocoinfinity1 1 month ago
he really speak so fast, but then i love how he debate.
lovelplants 3 months ago
pretty sure this is sped up 25%. what the fuck.
kzatching2 7 months ago 2
D'Souza talks like this "sdalfjasdljf...............dlsfjldasjflasdkjf.............jl;dsfjlasdjflsdkjf..........jlsdfjlsdaklfjsal"
sdeevooo 9 months ago
Why is the video moving so fast? Someone has adjusted the speed of the video, and it is very annoying. Makes it sound like both of em are on crack! But I do happen to agree more with Dr. Paul on this one. Good video!!!
LovinLivinIdaho 10 months ago 4
this guy says the people that did 911 all all dead?!?!?! no their not you ignorant sheep....some if not all are still alive, and none were on the passenger lists..
italstal07 11 months ago
Good job Dinesh.
joba606 1 year ago
In all seriousness... is the Ron Paul part of this on fast-forward of something? I've never in my life heard him speak so quickly in such a high pitched voice!
TimothyADonaghue 1 year ago
you do relize stalin killed 20 million of his own people and hitler killed 6 million right
xHippieHunter 1 year ago
Islam "needs" to be destroyed because of their believes. In Iran if you're a foreign person you maximum can own 49% of a company. It's prohibited to charge interest.
These kind of things are disturbing multicorporations, banks, etc... Let's be honest guys.. capitalist system is working very well, but fiat currencies and fractional reserve banking system is wrecking everything...
hosszuvagta 1 year ago
@hosszuvagta you have no clue what your talking about.
Capitalism depends on fractional reserve banking. fiat currencies were needed to end the dollar shortage during bretton woods. Foreigners are blocked from investing directly into particular firms in most countries. Capital controls like this have lessened the dangers posed by mass capital flows. Ron paul forgets that the gold standard entails deflationary pressures and does not favor expanionary spending at all.
The5highkids 11 months ago
While I don't entirely agree with D'Souza I can at least appreciate the fact that he keeps the debate civil.
syghur 1 year ago 2
I think Dinesh makes a stronger argument
hiphoprepublican 1 year ago
where the islamic terrorists before woodrow wilson and creation of israel?
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
!?!
All of recorded history has been a struggle between Islam & the West. The Moorish Invasion, the Islamic attacks in the Holy Land which started the crusades, the FACT that if Islam had not been stopped at Constantinople there would be no Western society..
Your polemic of man caused disaster, WWilson, & the US policy=enemy.. ugh. Islam sided w the Nazi's BECAUSE THEY KILL JEWS - long BEFORE WW, League o'Nations, &Israel. Want more expensive v Iraq?
/watch?v=RV301PZ-LhE
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph hahahaha where are you getting your information buddy? the muslims sided with nazis to kill jews. wow you have no idea about history. please stop. the muslims sided with nazis because they had no choice. the jews will living peacefully with arabs and christians in jerusalem before the creation of israel. so try backing up your conspiracy theories next time. read up on how the persians helped the polish refugees in WW2. oh and can you write in sentences next time.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
Paul's cause and effect is totally warped, he does not understand the nuances and goals of our foreign policy, does not understand the energy situation, the dangers of a nuclear world, the remilization of our allies that will occur when the US withdraws from the world, the ramifications thereof, the demographics of the Islamic expansion, their objection to our culture, the goals & strategy of militant Islam, nor the strengths and weakenesses of the American position
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph that was nothing but rhetoric, paul has got history on his side. islam is bad but now we are making it look better. also another thing, you can be as idealistic as you want however WE HAVE NO MONEY. this war is driving us further into debt. WE ARE LIMITED BY OUR RESOURCES. get real.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
What history do u imagine ur talking about? 9/11 (cost to US economy >$2.1Tn -40,000 lives if not for the bravest & most capable 1st responders in the world) Noticed our inability in dealing with nuculear states like N Korea & Pakistan? Realize US developed nukes in the 1940's w sliderules & no template? Realize that the ONLY reason states like Holland, Spain, Greece, Mexico, Turkey etc aren't nuculear is US hegemony? Have u ever even heard the term Pax Romana?
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph actually 9/11 cost 2,976 lives, I dont know where you got 40,000 from. no im very aware of europe bloodshed history, i have no idea what it has to do with anything. operation ajax is good example of the ramifications of us intervention, it wasnt like this before. energy policy? what has that got to with anything.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
On a typical weekday 50,000 people worked in the towers with another 200,000 passing through as visitors. The Two World Trade Center's observation deck alone received an estimated 80,000 visitors a day.
The 9/11 attacks, like the '93 attack, were planned to take place when the towers were at maximum capacity and were an attempt to kill everyone in that building. That only 2976 were killed is a miracle & a testament to the first responders who gave their lives to save them.
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph so you admit you were wrong and that 2796 people was the actual number of people dead. well thats a start.
i'm not for isolationism, so i will ignore that strawman.
so you are saying in the future they will attack us. i recognise that eventually they can reach us but if he they do the USA will pound them to the ground. there will be no iran left to speak of.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
Source: Darton, Eric (1999). Divided We Stand: A Biography of New York's World Trade Center. Basic Books. ISBN 0465017274
And the reason energy policy matters is because the isolationism, world abandonment, & the loss of US Hedgemony which you are advocating have untold economic & societal costs which you can't even begin to imagine - in large part due to your misguided ignorance & perverse inflexible determination not to actually know or understand what's going on.
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph the fact that you cant recognise the parallels between what the afghans did to the russians and what the afghans are doing to us is nothing short of amazing. the economy is the most important thing in a country.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bonfirejovi
The truth this disengenous argument ignores is that the REAL cause of the Soviet collapse was it's command&control economy, innefficiency, & * Centralized planning * - NOT Afghanistan - SHOCK - its the very same welfare state Ponzi scheme policies - Medicare, SS, unionized government pensions, HUD, & entitlement - punishing hard work, responsibility, savings; Rewarding ignorance, dependency, & failure - that is bankrupting the US today - NOT our foreign policy. Run the numbers
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
In your pre-pubescent 15 minute world view, Europe - the very best 1st world lot re: Freedom, stability, etc. are "civilized". It ignores completely that their history is one of NON-STOP bloodshed & violence from the fall of the Pax Romana right up until WW2. These most educated & civilized (sincere) ppl produced not one, but TWO of the most EXPENSIVE & horrific bloodbaths in human (& US) history in just the past 100 years. You clearly have NO concept about energy policy
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph hahaha are you talking about the rocket of worms he sent to space, what danger is that going to cause to space? their is no ramification to our economy from worms in a rocket. i dont know what the rocket has to do with an EMP pulse. you are just full of non sequiturs. in your incoherent rambling i dont think you have the first idea what you are talking about.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
That you won't or aren't capable of drawing a connection between the achievement of orbital space flight, and an evolving inter-continental threat by a soon to be nuclear Islamic fundamentalist regime is the heart of the problem.
That u believe u can hide behind oceans, renig on treaties, cause the world to re-arm, allow rampant nuclear proliferation in every corner of the globe, & call the result "economically wise" is nothing short of hubris.
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph if people cant feed themselves then i thought they give two shit about some muslim extremists. the hunger will get them before the islamice terrorists do. do you want another great depression living off ketchup sandwiches. your mentality is a real threat to the country's well being.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
Do you realize Ahmadinejad has now launched SEVERAL Kavoshgar-3 rockets & sattelites into space? Realize the danger of intentional flak & debris into orbit, the hazard it poses & the present technical impossibility it poses to remove it? The ramification to our economy & society, or even know what an EMP pulse is? This is based soley on PUBLIC information. N Korea? Venezuela (guess where Uranium is mined?), Cuba? If when we abandon our allies, relative stability is gone & EVERYONE remilitarizes
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph all of recorded history has been a struggle between west and the west meaning internal wars in europe. so what is your point? also try structuring your ramblings, you are very incoherent.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
"All of recorded history has been a struggle between west & the west meaning internal wars in europe."
The US was drawn into WW1 Europe & withdrew. Not 50 years later, during the height of isolationism we were attacked, & forced to fight a far costlier war - but this time we did NOT withdraw, & as result, the world, including the US, has largely lived in peace.
thereligionofpeace - DOT - com/attacks-2010 - DOT - htm
/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph are you talking about WW2? what about vietnam where we did leave and they are living in peace and we are trading with them. the world has not largely lived in peace since WW2. There was the cold war, the cuban missile crisis, the bay of pigs, vietnam, the korean war, the iraq war, the iraq bombings, the afghan war, the iran iraq war, the gulf war etc... lol some peace.
oh by the way thanks for ignoring all my other points, i'll take that as a concession on your part.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
This is a contrived argument intended to deny knowing that there has been NO war or armed aggression in any place where there is an established US military base (the topic of discussion), deny that in every case, the nations involved have demilitarized, stabilized, expanded personal freedom, & to deny that the dividends of the policy of engagement are a 70 year period of peace, prosperity, mutually beneficial trade, & economic development unparalleled in human history.
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph @mredstriumph im glad you recognize the shit you were spewing before was ridiculous. now if you want to rephrase what you said and say that "there has been no war in any place where there is a US military base" then i would agree with you because the military base is already there. your point was that the world has been safer since the US intervened in WW2 and that is such an obvious lie.
oh ya the interference in iran in 1953 led to such freedom with a dictator followed by muslim
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
Re: "I'm glad you recognize", "so you admit", "take as a concession", "so you concede", etc etc etc
Are u really so starved for validation that u need to persist in this silly sham tactic? At what point do u realize that a person can disagree with a point of view - even argue against it, without exploding into insult, expletive, & desperate rhetorical nonsense u think wins "points".. alternately wailing "straw men", non sequitur! then attacking w space worms & f#$k. Just sad
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph it took you 5 days to say that? dude just let it go.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
Sorry you had to wait so long.
Working people sometimes have other things to do.
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
Every conflict u listed, in fact, was NOT within the US sphere of trade & influence.
In each, the aggressor was the same * 19th century centrally-planned totalitarianism * spreading through force, conquest, & collectivist revolution - enslaving, expropriating, torturing & murdering at even greater scale than that of WW2.
It was stopped without bloodshed in Europe; US; USSR; - w.o. nuclear warfare - & ended through economics @ consider less loss of life&treasure vs WW1&2
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph i think most of the conflicts i listed where within the US influence. the iraq war was a war of aggression against a sovereign country. same with afghanistan. they supported iraq in the iran iraq conflict. so i would say you are wrong. but that wasnt your point was it? the world hasnt been safer since the intervention in WW2.
oh dont get me started on the commies, their foreign policy was way worse than the americans post woodrow wilson. they had a proper soviet empire.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
The truth this disengenous argument ignores is that the REAL cause of the Soviet collapse was it's command&control economy, innefficiency, & * Centralized planning * - NOT Afghanistan - SHOCK - its the very same welfare state Ponzi scheme policies - Medicare, SS, unionized government pensions, HUD, & entitlement - punishing hard work, responsibility, savings; Rewarding ignorance, dependency, & failure - that is bankrupting the US today - NOT our foreign policy. Run the numbers
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph what the fuck are you on about? the massive majority of the soviets spending was in the military including the draining decade in afghanistan which is a major reason why they left. everyone knows their central economic plan was a disaster and led to mass starvation way before 1989 but the military spending was the straw that broke the camels back. the commies have done way worse than the americans ever have done.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
@bonfirejovi
I realize nothing I can say/do will persuade u to STUDY history, & I recognize ur adherance to '08 election cycle propaganda & its slavish cartooned characterizations precludes ur understanding - or even hearing - what I'm saying, but pause a moment & indulge me:
/watch?v=cwNgNyiXPLk
/watch?v=WeBtdwPpTQM
/watch?v=6w6gf3tSGTg
Parts 17a,b,c of a much larger (vital) "Crash Course" linking energy & economics
U think this is about Ron Paul, but ur in the dark
mredstriumph 1 year ago
@mredstriumph no because you havent mentioned anything historically relevant, and spent a good deal of your time ranting about space worms. im very aware thank you very much. actually my main reason for being against the war is the debt crisis we face. even if you do believe in the crap you have been spewing we dont have any money and our resources are stretched to the limit. we cant carry on. the afghans drained the soviets for 10 years and they will drain us as well. there is history.
bonfirejovi 1 year ago
Boy Ron is talking fast here.
PresidentRich 1 year ago
@PresidentRich I almost thought the video was speeding up. I think his mind works fast and he has to intentionally speak slowly when he's in mainstream media.
OutlawTomFantastic 1 year ago
Comment removed
jisangNY1 1 year ago
Comment removed
eugdog106 1 year ago
it's been sped up to keep it under 10 minutes
ykoshy 1 year ago
How are Europeans more decadent than Americans? We're not... idiot
PjotrvanNiekerk 2 years ago
D'Souza needs to remember his identity and who he is, why doesnt he go back to India and then we'll see if he still supports the globalized free and democratic america
Warrantofficer13 2 years ago
Ron Paul is the man!!!!
pabyizzy 2 years ago 13
dsouza makes the same shit joke everytime
richardcadbury 2 years ago 2
come on man, it's manifest destiny! You can't stop it, I can't stop it.
enomarekim 2 years ago
I don't know who did it but the Ron Paul section of this video is accelerated... probably to make him sound funny. Shame on these subliminal tecniques. Liberty will pervail!
FreedomParadox 2 years ago 3
I think the whole segment is sped up, D'souza usually speaks much slower too.
dmlauffer 2 years ago
American govt been playing hero, barging into another country trying to put a stop to war which they only made escalate even more.
What does he think give America the right to be the judge other country of wrong doing. While American corporation went into other countries and exploit their natural resources and enslave their nations.
The problem lies with over-inflated sense of ego in Washington coupled with Inquisition "righteous" fury.
superchink28 2 years ago
Alright. Wow. D'Souza and Paul were definitely the two best debaters. The pro-war side was better than the anti-war side simply because the pro-war side, both of the guys were sane. Paul's colleague, the anarchist/atheist "Flush religion down the toilet" guy sounds like a babbling anti-war protester.
Overall...hmmm....I think Paul won because for terrorism, the evidence seemed to be on his side: Pape, and Schuerer. Thepro-war side could only guess why they attacked us.
airbornisgood4u 2 years ago
Agreed. There's a better war hawk stance that is more in line with moderation and the military, but since this is the intellectual world they get some civilians to come out and blabber about what they think about grand geopolitics and bullshit.
They should get Nate Fick and Bing West to debate... they'd kick Paul's ass.
tubub 2 years ago
Ron Paul schooled them.
Carlitos1010 2 years ago
I gave it 5 ** for the first guy! WOOT! Even though he's a neo-con he made a good case here!
tubub 2 years ago
Youre an idiot
MIT2004 2 years ago
good one.
tubub 2 years ago
AGUANTE RON PAUL 2012!
zulgyan 2 years ago
This clown makes jokes about Bush and Hitler and expects people to buy into all the rest of the garbage he mixes in with his jokes. His arguments are specious, frivolous, without foundation and without merit. I rest my case on the joker. Then Ron Paul comes up there and the smoke clears and things are clear and concise again. Awesome Ron.
HR1207auditthefed 2 years ago
The video speeds up during Ron Paul's rebuttal.
purplepamphleteer 2 years ago
Thats what i though as well. That was too fast.
MIT2004 2 years ago
Ron Paul would make a vastly superior president to Obama.
It's the perfect time for him too, his economic views are exactly what will get us out of the quagmire.
Obama's the sort who you elect in the upswing of the business cycle for your bread and circuses.
fomastephanovitch 2 years ago 9
How did the Bible know that beheading would be the Muslim's calling card? See Revelations 20:4
How did the Bible know that there only needed to be one false prophet? See Revelations 13:18 "Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding number the multitude of the second beast for it is the multitude from one man and the multitude is in the name of allah."
ABAisSCIENCE 2 years ago
If the airlines had slaughtered Muslims 9/11 would not have happened. If we treated Muslim men as dogs (they behead people for fun) they'd think twice about splashing acid on preteen girls and shooting 100 rockets on Israel on Christmas Eve and Christmas day 2008.
ABAisSCIENCE 2 years ago
you're a fool. "our" way usually kills and maims just as much, or more, innocent people than enemies. our way is militarily, and only militarily, simply because war is an industry. our "solutions" to moral problems only add death and destruction and costs our own economy dearly. war always creates unintended consequences, that usually lead to more war. the US has supported atrocities and installed dictators in the past. the US is also immoral. we're just better at covering it up..
itzahazylife 2 years ago 2
these wars aren't about humanity. they're about money. war generates some of the highest profits of anything. the flag follows the dollar, the soldiers follow the flag, and the country follows the soldier. look up Major General Smedley Butler. he was in active duty for 34+ years, and the most decorated solider in history. when he got back home, he gave a famous speech called "war is a racket"..it benefits the few at the expense of the many.
itzahazylife 2 years ago 2
You're so right itzahazylife. Lay down & die before any enemy for America is so wicked to drop bombs & supplies on a nation at the same time & rebuild any nation it attacks.
Let's accept Sharia courts so that Muslim men in America can abuse their wives in democratic countries too & make terrorists right in our country.
I think Dinesh D'souza has said America works for its' interests. Why not? So does everyone else.
Men are wicked & the Bible says that.
Care to argue the Bible?
ABAisSCIENCE 2 years ago
america works for its interests at the expense of the wars we're so addicted to. and it's not "our" interests, it's a select few that reap the benefits. the poor and middle class are damaged by these wars, not benefited. we preach one thing to our people, and do another. we're one big facade. and this is okay because other nations partake in this deception?..we're america. we're supposed to be the benchmark for what is good and moral. we're just an empire lusting for power. and that's not ok.
itzahazylife 2 years ago
Everything works for it's interests. So what?
Ever think that all are wicked and so while you prostrate yourself you leave yourself open to much abuse.
America does a better job than Afganistand that splashes acid on preteen girls for trying to go to school.
How about Pakistan that splashes acid on girls for refusing to have sex?
How about in Yemen where ten year olds have to hope someone can pay to help them get divorced?
ABAisSCIENCE 2 years ago
They are saying America supports Jews and Christians and those people believe in a God who is not afraid of us.
ABAisSCIENCE 2 years ago
Wow, never seen paul this heated. Very nice.
jvittetoe 3 years ago 2
Paul is right...he always was
Sevekhh 3 years ago 2
Haha, sounds like someone got an orgasm at 6:54 :D
Hiki321 3 years ago
roflfl
jvittetoe 3 years ago
In that sense Bush did his job in the middle east.
ABAisSCIENCE 3 years ago
I realize the below is crazy talk, but keep in mind the war shouldn't have to be bettering others.
So sorry Dinesh for disagreeing with you that freedom is the goal.
Leave America the fuck alone is the message we should be imparting.
ABAisSCIENCE 3 years ago
PART TWO:
If anyone asked, "What about Osama or Afganistan?"
We could say, "What of him? The moment he does anything his family's home nation will be gone. Let him have Afganistan & if he thinks he can better it after Russia had its way with it then have at it.
I don't think North Korea would have announced WMDs, nor would anyone want to screw with us.
So response democracy for Iraq and Iran gone from the planet with no resources used on it other than weapons.
ABAisSCIENCE 3 years ago
it all comes down to 2 things..humilty, or dominion..we choose dominion..u can either believe dominance will keep us secure, or humilty will keep us secure. well, since most of our problems come from the pursuit of dominance, humilty is the path our foreign policy needs to take.
itzahazylife 2 years ago
Psalms 51:17 sounds great for policy on looking at yourselves individually.
Being humble on our knees with our heads hitting the dirt at the feet of the Imam's is idiotic.
Later itzahazylife.
The Muslim needs to get angry about Muslims splashing acid on preteen girls for going to school or refusing to offer their bodies for sex. If they don't seek justice then we should give it to them our way.
ABAisSCIENCE 2 years ago
Remove all soldiers from the penninsula, but declare war on Saudia Arabia. Again a double minded man is unstable in all his ways.
We should have attacked Iraq straight out & then bombed Iran off the map killing any living thing that tried to leave the premises.
When asked why we did either action we should have said, "We will do what we will & any further attack on America by the Middle East will eliminate the existance of Saudia Arabia from the world."
See PART TWO
ABAisSCIENCE 3 years ago
ron paul never said we should have declared war on saudi arabia. he said if we HAD to declare war on someone, it should have been saudi arabia, since mostly all of the terrorists came from there.
and u know a good way to get them to leave us alone?..by NOT having an aggressive foreign policy. we stick our snouts in the hornets nest, get stung, and vow revenge. we have 761 bases in 150 countries..we spend almost as much on our military as the rest of the world combined. (cont)
itzahazylife 2 years ago
America likely should have fought WWI and WWII & then got out of war until someone pleaded for us to come in & we should have put a huge bill on both nations after each & every war afterwards.
Still Dinesh is wrong that we as Americans must fight for freedom everywhere relative to nations, but we should do whatever we need to get them to leave us alone.
ABAisSCIENCE 3 years ago
we have a military industrial complex running full swing in the US..we find any reason to involve ourselves. then when we do, we end up instilling hate. then to solve that problem, we use more military force and more war. it's asinine. it's ALL because of our interventionism in the name of "spreading morality"..but rather than back the hell out, and walk away from it all, u suggest that we wipe these nations off of the planet so we can continue staying on the path of our current foreign policy?
itzahazylife 2 years ago
the tape was sped up or something??? dr paul talks so fast but it seems like a sped up vid.
love this debate series!
UberSciFiNerd 3 years ago
Ron Paul was really talking fast, but he has the greater point - Saudi Arabia is responsible for 9/11. If anything, we should have gone to war with Saudi Arabia. Not that it would have made a difference in the "strategery."
thomaserossi 3 years ago
Wow! Dinesh knocked that out of the Park. Based on his previous performance I didn't think he had it in him. I did enjoy his book "What's so Great about America?" It's a good read, but not too flashy. "Illiberal Education" is vastly superior and I recommend it to anyone who feels the American Left has even a little too much influence in College.
thomaserossi 3 years ago
6:54-6:56
That is about the same sound I made after Ron Paul's statement!
randyguitarman13 3 years ago
Mr D'Souza,
If you don't have to defeat your opponents why are you not president? How Many people voted for you?
Did they block you out with an evil eye?
Get a clue. Nobody would ever vote for you because you are a petulant twit.
theunbubba 3 years ago
I really wish Alan Keyes was a part of this debate.
GabrielKoulikov 3 years ago
love ya Ron Paul but ya gotta slow down your talking. lol
return135 3 years ago
Ron Paul is talking so fast.
metalmike06 3 years ago
I really Dislike D'Souza. He refuses to debate anyone on there own home turf, and says the same things in every debate. Literally, word for word, the same things. Like he is reading a speech. Even down to his Mosquito joke, which he also used while debating Hitchens.
Traxtitan 3 years ago 3
thats what she said
VoiceOfModeration 3 years ago
Osama Bin Laden knew he couldn't destroy the U.S. externally, so he is bankrupting us, his plan is succeeding and by trying to occupy practicallyh the whole middle east in an effort to promote freedom? Wheres the economic freedom and civil freedom in paying for a war, and making our troops go over there when they are constitutionally suppose to defend our coountry, not invade and occupy others.
DTownhippie 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ron Paul's kookiness out in full force. Wonder if he knows he's wasting his time.
Jakeblood240 3 years ago
Iran in the next few decades. It's important we keep these nut jobs away from that red button.
drhelio212 3 years ago
Hey Dude, enlist,get your tin pot and gun,,ill sit here eat and drink get fat, dream about Britney Spears, and ill be rooting for you to shoot some Jihadists,,
AngriestAmerican 3 years ago
Mr. D'souza is a bit of an ignorant man. He believes that we should invade -whole- countries because they are all supposedly fanatics? Attack Iran with this same backwards *** logic instead of targeting radical groups with special ops teams, and we will ignite a far more devious conflict than both Afghanistan and Iraq wars combined. Imagine what money and mobilization would be required to fight these kinds of war. I sense blood in shark filled waters in the next few decades with...(cont.)
drhelio212 3 years ago 2
To much coffe Dinesh?
WilltheAtheist 3 years ago
Why is this video so fast? It's annoying.
1 star for low quality.
jd24717 3 years ago 2
I'm guessing it's to get it to fit inside of 10 minutes.
bighitter42 3 years ago
Christians did nothing when Clinton/Albright attacked Christian Serbia. The media lies which preceded it weren't countered by christian support. Now in Bosnia, Kosovo and Albania we have jihadi nut jobs running the place. I won't forgive America for that, never mind the muslims you have alienated many Europeans over that episode.....I'm a Brit by the way not Serbian.
wilsparky 3 years ago
Jihdai nut jobs? What do you know about FY politics?
The conflict between Serbs and Albanians in Kosovo is as much one of ethnicity and language as one of religion. That's what makes the case of the Serbian minority in Kosovo so important; it's not that they are faced with Jihadis, but ethnic supremacists who want a Greater Albania state.
Myndir 3 years ago
Humans only seem to have rights when it fits the agendas of the powerful. Their friends in Turkey aren't oppressing Kurds...oh no. That isn't reported so it doesn't happen. Macedonians aren't being attacked by albo's..because it isn't reported. If they don't report it, it never happened. If they do, then it must have.
wilsparky 3 years ago
The conflict in Macedonia is ongoing...the same albanian narco-terrorist-sex-traffickers are now expanding south and their murder campaigns go unreported by Western 'human rights' voices.
wilsparky 3 years ago
Only 'ethnicity'? I don't think the desecration of Orthodox chruches could be thought of as completely devoid of any religious content....but I know what you mean. My partner is in politics in FY so I know a little.
wilsparky 3 years ago
Dr.Paul you are truly amazing
54spiritedwill54 3 years ago 2
seriously, was this video sped up? Ron Paul is talking soooo fast, but everybody else seems normal.
andrewl105 3 years ago 5
He is that smart.
leoca 3 years ago
yeah I was like wtf?
staniscanner 2 years ago
i think the video was sped up
djphaseboy 3 years ago 3
That was the most awesome soundbite I have ever heard from Ron Paul you can see he was really passionate and meant it what he said. Even Barack Obama at his best could not have expressed himself as impressively as Ron Paul did there. Awesome. Ron Paul should be president!
markjayaweera 3 years ago
I take that comment back.His IQ is way too low for this debate.Casey might as well go up on stage with a sighn that says I am an Anti American idiot who knows nothing of American history.
Athenticdrummer 3 years ago
That Casey guy and former Canidate Ron Pual just proved how unintelligent they are in this debate.Casey stated some of the dumbest comments I have ever heard.He doesnt even know history in the proper context.So Hitler and Stalin were trying to sighn a peace treaty with the jews?Not just Nazi Germany and not just Stalin in Russia.The jews are the most percicuted and hated race in the world.Sorry Casey you IQ is too low for this debate LOL.
Athenticdrummer 3 years ago
Heh, Ron Paul gets all worked up, over these stupid fools! Exept Casey of course..
MopacMurtaza 3 years ago
I have never... ever... heard Dr. Paul talk that fast. He must have popped a speed pill or something.
dtaijo174 3 years ago
Haha :)
MopacMurtaza 3 years ago 2
Dinesh said Khomeni was a threat without the knowledge that the war was initiated by Iraq.
afkamistan 3 years ago
I think he uses that mosquito in the nudist colony in every debate...it's a good laugh-getting line. Gotta put a little humor in there why you speak publicly.
scpotts101 3 years ago
ahhahaha way to go !!! speeding up the tape... looks like Old ROn's on SPEED
RON IS THE BEST
AMERICAN REVOLUTION !!!
gudeljb 4 years ago
Funny guy.
MooseOfReason 4 years ago
When DrPaul speaks many people listen..
RP in 08
jaxxfat 4 years ago
Are we going to let Osama bin Laden define our foreign policy by what he considers his holy land!? This is outrageous! Screw that, we'll bomb the hell out of these terrorists wherever they are, holy or not.
DarthVega7 4 years ago
Osama bin Laden already defined your foreign policy, by dragging your asses out to Iraq and Afghanistan, making it for him a hell lot easier to kill you off and for him to recruit more fighters and get backing from more Muslims.
have you even heard what paul said?
dissershock 4 years ago 4
LOL! I didn't know Howard Dean was in the audience! RAWHHHHHHHHHHHH!
DarthVega7 4 years ago
YES!! Ron Paul speaks the truth! Why can't these right wing neo-con nuts get any of the truth into their skulls? Why are they SO damn stubborn and bullheaded? Diplomacy is the way! Not antagonism and hostility.
FinnHawk 4 years ago 3
Finn... those yer talking about grew up thinking being a bully was ok , probably now have a badge or a gov job with power and wouldnt support DrPaul on their best day..We wont convert everyone,,just the indocrinated that want deprogramming because they have a strong sense of what truth is..
jaxxfat 4 years ago
Dinesh is an idiot...
FinnHawk 4 years ago
Dinesh makes that stupid "mosquito in the nudist colony" comment in his debate with Hitchens as well. After saying it, he says nothing of value, in both debates.
Canadamark78 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuckin stinky curry shithead pile of shit hindu scum, who the fuck let him on stage. i am surprised ron didnt throw up
KingSafe 4 years ago
good exchange i hope ddsouza goes to berxeley tomorrow for marines v city council
8data 4 years ago
what about guam
what are we doing there
8data 4 years ago
D'Souza isn't that much of an idiot. While I disagree, he's pretty good.
letmypeopleho69 4 years ago
Comment removed
omerlives 4 years ago
One can be good at debate (though D'Souza is just really good at perverting argument) and still be a neocon prick.
bigalisme 4 years ago
Comment removed
omerlives 4 years ago
Comment removed
omerlives 4 years ago
Comment removed
omerlives 4 years ago
Well at the moment India is one of the leading developing countries, and yes it has many fundamental problems in accordance to human rights, treatment of "undesirables", and especially women. Blaming India for spreading terrorism is a joke. You obviously have a good deal of hatred in you manifesting as prejudice towards India. Please LISTEN to the debate. Besides, D'Souza is an American. Your arguments are fanatical. Please think before you type.
bigalisme 4 years ago
Comment removed
omerlives 4 years ago
If you're going to make assertions like that you require evidence. I'm not defending D'Souza. He's a douchebag. The Muslim "Bogeyman" is definitely bullshit, but militant Islam is a threat, but moreso to muslims. America could bomb the shit out of the middle east, but that would be wrong in so many ways. You make good points, and hating India as a nation and its government is one thing, but hating the people of India just because they are Indian is fuckin' stupid.
bigalisme 4 years ago 2
Comment removed
omerlives 4 years ago
"smelly apu habibi" and "Most Indians (smelly dot heads)" don't help argument. Refuting an argument politely is more powerful than attacking with immature speech. Thank you for your comments, but I believe we can both agree that D'Souza is a scumbag, and yes some people from bronze age foreign countries can bring in that country's backward thinking and then merely disguise in a western appearance. He acts like an American but his message is remnant of bronze age, prejudiced, class-system India.
bigalisme 4 years ago
Comment removed
omerlives 4 years ago
Please don't "educate" an Indian about Indians. The problem isn't them being Indian, and please refrain from racial slander, but I'll assume you're referring to Hindu Indians. Socialism is better than fascism. If you have a point to make it is self defeating if it is based on racism as no one will take you seriously. You sound like a 5-year-old, or the stereotypical, angry, sexually-repressed Islamic male.
bigalisme 4 years ago
Comment removed
omerlives 4 years ago
Hey no juice guess who
NeonKnight88 4 years ago
"what about all of the hundreds of thousands of people coming out of the medrassas and the mosques signing up for jihad" GOOOD QUESTION! Your answer Mr. D'Souza?: "KILL THEM ALL!!"
hiimallen 4 years ago
why is the ron paul portion of this all sped up? he already speaks pretty fast, but this is nuts!
WayMoreAwesome 4 years ago
this guy is an idiot.blowback.blow these dude.get out of our country and we wont kill you idiots.shutup.
cleanarab 4 years ago
offer the vice presidency to doug casey...haa ha ha ha ha ha....you're not going to be president. so go ahead, give doug casey vp. :)
eharvimy 4 years ago
WW1&2 were both banker setups, as well as the Bolshevic revolution.
See Murray Rothbard's "Wall Street, Banks and American Foreign Policy" for the painstakenly researched account that enumerates Joe Kennedy's statement "Fifty men run America, & thats a high figure"
marxbitesall 4 years ago
D'Souza says that the US did not sell weapons of mass destruction, and then in the same sentence says the US did. Completely contracdictory. He's obviously a tinge confused. Aside from distortions, he only speaks of ideology and rebukes facts and true history. If you speak of liberty and ideology, how can you apply that to "siding with the bad guy?"
trevorhotrod 4 years ago
I'm sick of the lowest common denometer comparison of World War II. World War II was a whole other ball of wax, was under completely different circumstances. People are misquoted and past history is redirected by using the ghost of Hitler and Stalin. It's a cop out and a stupid comparrison with little value other than emotional aggitation.
trevorhotrod 4 years ago 2
LOL! It's so funny when Ron Paul cracks himself up at 4:30.
dna1987 4 years ago
where the hell is this guy from?
abutalaat 4 years ago
Dr. D'Souza is an American. He's a scholar and an intellectual, that's probably why you've never heard of him. :)
eharvimy 4 years ago
He also believes Christianity is the source of all goodness and likes to blame the inquisition that persecuted the jews on... wait for it... THE JEWS! Have you read his book, "The Enemy at Home", which points the finger at liberalism as the cause for 9/11? Knowing D'Souza doesn't make you an intellectual by proximity. It means more likely (especially if you like him; not saying you do) that you are a fan of inequal status for women, and are very close-minded.
bigalisme 4 years ago
Ron Paul whooped that ass hardcore!
thank god ron paul is running for president
HDNSP 4 years ago
Ron Paul pwns!
darkreign16 4 years ago