Very Simple to understand: 9/11 = NO PLANE "Lesson 1" Addendum

[TheThore]

Im ersten Semester Physik lernt man, daß ein Alu-Flieger meterdicke Stahlträger und Betonböden durchschlagen kann ohne daß die Flügel abbrechen? Und Thermit ist nicht schuld am Einsturz weil es Stahl nicht durchschneidet, aber Flugzeug-Kerosin kanns? Die "Debunkings" sind interessant, würd gern mal ne pro und contra Liste sehen (ernsthaft) um die Gegensätze mal zu erörtern

[Psy0psAgent]

There are no family members of the passengers.

[RazielKain]

@Psy0psAgent I actually did a video about that, its in german tho.

A short summary: It took me about 5 mins of google and whitepage research to find a phone number of a family member.

I didn't show the number nor name but how you can look'em up yourself.

[chillyrooster]

@RazielKain ur fool of chit there are no family members ofthe passengers

[RazielKain]

@chillyrooster Again:

I actually did a video about that, its in german tho.

A short summary: It took me about 5 mins of google and whitepage research to find a phone number of a family member.

I didn't show the number nor name but how you can look'em up yourself.

[chillyrooster]

@RazielKain send me the number

[74pbg]

Bei den meisten Videoaufnahme von diesem Einschlag, kann ich die "no planer" schon verstehen! Gebt doch zu das eigentlich alle diese Aufnahmen wirklich gefaked aussehen, ohne das gäbe es keine Diskussion!

[warequalsnofuture]

Wieso beschränkten wir uns nicht auf die Indizien, die bei Ansichten gemeinsam haben, davon gibt es genug.

Warum diese Entzweiung der Menschen.

Hass und Uneinigkeit gibt es doch schon genug.

Willst du es den Eliten einfach machen in dem hier wieder ihr wichtigstes "Werkzeug" zum Einsatz kommt?

"Devide & Conquer" - "Teile & Herrsche".

Übrigens: 10. September 2011 - 9/11 Demo Karlsruhe

[warequalsnofuture]

Es ist zwar ein Uterschied ob es Flugzeuge waren oder nicht - & ich bin mir da noch nicht sicher - aber am Endresultat ändert es nichts.

Wir wollen alle, dass die Wahrheit an Licht kommt.

Du kannst ihm keinesfalls unterstellen, er würde das NICHT wollen.

Nur weil es Meinungsverschiedenheiten in manchen Punkten gibt, musst

du doch nicht unterstellen, er würde es mit Absicht machen.

Vielleicht hast du ja auch Unrecht?

Fakt: Es gibt über 100 Indizien, das es nicht "Al Quaida" war.

[warequalsnofuture]

"wiederlegen" wird so geschrieben: "widerlegen".

Es kommt von "gegen" und NICHT von "noch einmal". ;)

Ich mein ja nur, weil du 911newsmagazin für seine Fehler kritisierst.

[1234proximus]

Tja - VTs müssen halt Lügen um die Wahrheit zu vermitteln - ist doch logisch oder? ;)

[boohoo1902]

Here is a good film for anyone who still has doubts:

youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37S­M&feature=related

9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT. Out the liars and murderers.

[RazielKain]

@boohoo1902 Watch the "Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics" debate and tell me again:

Why should I believe anything those morons are sayin in their video

Oh and you are a moron you can eliminate the mass since F=m*a and F=G*m1*m2/R^2 ->

m*a=G*m1*m2/R^2 with m=m1 and m2=m(e)

also since m(e)>>m1 and R>>h you don't have to use them in your calculation

If you think I said "The building had no mass" you are a complete idiot who didn't pass 6th grade science

[boohoo1902]

@RazielKain Yes I've seen it. This guy made a great point about it:

youtube.com/watch?v=5RWNtApLhD­0

AGENDA ALERT!!!

[RazielKain]

@boohoo1902 Yeah everybody who doesn't follow your "Truther" movement has an agenda and is part of the system ... bla bla bla

Oh I have an idea, did you see South Park?

You are part of the US government who spread the 911 theories so the population thinks the gov is allmighty and you shouldn't oppose them

WHAT IS YOUR AGENDA?! PEOPLE WANT THE TRUTH, STOP SPREADING LIES -.-

[boohoo1902]

@RazielKain That's right, blur the edges. One day EVERYONE will know the truth. And I hope they out your agenda for what it is - disinformation. All I ask is that reasonable people WITHOUT AN AGENDA look at the evidence themselves. They should also know it's going to get a lot worse than this. MUCH worse. For example, FEMA CAMPS. Look that up!

[RazielKain]

@boohoo1902 .... you didn't get the message? Fema death camps were a hoax.....

Why am I not surprised?

[boohoo1902]

They had explosives on every 2nd floor I believe, just from watching the exploding towers.

[boohoo1902]

Who's paying you to spout these lies?

9/11 WAS an inside job.

[RazielKain]

@boohoo1902 This is exactly what I hate.

"Hey look at this, I don't understand it - Well that's .... - YOU ARE ONE OF THEM. IT WAS AN INSIDE JOB - But you have no evidence to think that - IT WAS AN INSIDE JOB - But why do you think ... - IT FELL IN 9 seconds - That's not true - IT WAS AN INSIDE JOB"

That is not how reality works! You have to provide evidence for a claim -.-

[boohoo1902]

@RazielKain Did I say or insinuate that? No! Either you are very stupid, ignorant or have an agenda. There's hundreds of questions. Not 1 or 2. Why did the buildings blow up into powder? Now that IS impossible. We know the truth, you just can't handle it.

[RazielKain]

@boohoo1902 Yeah since there were no bigger pieces of rubble present (irony)

Maybe the fall of hundreds of kilograms cement falling down has something to do with it

Even if explosives were used do you have any idea what mass of explosives you would need to grind them to powder? -.-

This is a simple argument from ignorance, you need proof

[RazielKain]

@boohoo1902 Soooo the first video claims that an audiopeak 16s before the collapse is supposed to be an explosion, 16s? Are you kidding me?

The second one claims 1/2s per story which would be nice if gravity fall was a fluid motion, sadly it's accelerated plus the bogus claim of "free fall speed" plus the bogus claim of "massive steel column" which were .. i think 66mm think steel tubes Do I honestly need to go on? oO

[boohoo1902]

@RazielKain Nice try. You are either a bufoon or in their pocket. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you're a mere simpleton with no grasp of physics.

[RazielKain]

@boohoo1902 Nice bluff but I am calling you on that one

I actually passed Physics I & II at the university level without much trouble ^^

[boohoo1902]

@RazielKain Ah, so you ARE on their payroll. YOU HAVE BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS! YOU MAKE ME SICK.

How come you don't know Newton's laws of motion???

[RazielKain]

@boohoo1902 Sure sure I am part of the German Kraut Kontrol Squad (GKKS) -.- (please note the irony)

I know the laws of motion why do you ask?

[boohoo1902]

@RazielKain Sure, but knowing and understanding are 2 different things. You obviously haven't grasped the latter. Wht don't YOU produce some evidence now using Newton's 3 laws of motion why the buildings fell (or just choose 1 - building 7 being the most flawed of course). When you've done that, I'll come back and COMPLETELY destroy your argument using the same laws. Then perhaps you will run away back to your world of make believe and insinuation. People like you ARE the problem.

[RazielKain]

@boohoo1902 ..... What the .... I know all of these words but you are not making any sense

Why the buildings fell with the laws of motion? You do realize GRAVITY is not part of the laws of motion?

[RazielKain]

@boohoo1902 for the love of ... NO I DON'T NEED THE CONSTANT G

Gravity is not part of the law of motion what you mean is F=G*m1*m2/R^2 and since we can eliminate the mass of the building we can use G*m1/R^2=g=9.81m/s^2

also not law of motion: s=a/2t^2+v0*t which we can get the time it would take if it was a free fall (around 9.22s i think)

Guess what? It took longer -.-

[boohoo1902]

@RazielKain THE BUILDING HAD NO MASS? Wow! What a joke answer!!!

[RazielKain]

@boohoo1902 and even if it took exactly 9.22 that would require explosives AT EVERY SINGLE STORY WHICH SOMEBODY WOULD HAVE NOTICED

Anything faster than that you need rocket engines on the top of the building

and even if:

What is the fucking motive? "Oh yeah they flew buildings in our towers but they didn't collapse so it's all good"

Are you completely mental? oO

[boohoo1902]

@RazielKain What exactlt is your motive? Who pays you to spout these lies you sick fuck?

[RalfonsoX]

Danke für dieses Video! Mr.Fernsehkritik gibt sich ja viel Mühe, seine "Wahrheit" durchzudrücken und lässt keinen Kommentar zu, der nicht positiv und kritiklos für seine Thesen ist. Ich hab's versucht. Er blockiert den Nutzer gleich für alle Videos! Nur einmal ist ihm einer wohl durchgewitscht. Dummes Versehen! Nutzer werderization wurde von ihm auch gleich als dumm, blöd und als Verbrecher beschimpft (unter .youtube.com/watch?v=ctoF2VfdZ­ZY) Das ist wahre Meinungsfreiheit!

[jackster501]

if you look right before the explosion, a plane hits the tower and goes right threw the building. idiot

[SpyroTheDreamBoy]

DieBandbreite - Selbst gemacht <<<< Mehr sag ich dazu nicht !

[metalfist616]

ist dir eig schonmal aufgefallen, dass dieses uns als "original video" angedrehte teil tatsächlich 3 mal geschnitten wurde? ich denke simonshack (septemberclues) ist darauf in einem seiner neueren clips eingegangen! also selbst wenn das ding DORT gedreht wurde ist es nicht mehr "echt" , und das ist bei den meisten amateuraufnahmen das problem!