Solar Distillation #1 of 3 Purify Water Make Steam

[44509green]

lame it is so boring it wasnt even what i whanted to find

[cdfgh1111]

How many times did he say the word patented ?  Even 20 years ago I can't see that. Commonly known principals, procedures, commonly available materials,

[JULYINJULY]

Great Stuff! Wow 1991, where has the time gone?

Thank you for the cool video.

[hmu7]

Where can I buy this wonder?

[eddiequest3]

Forget buying it. You can make it easily. I got many of my ideas from a small company called Knowledge Publications.

[crapmanism]

@hmu7 google for "fcubed" ull find a company in australia

[Jdlifsey]

Why not build a VERY large Hoffman Apparatus, put it at the ocean's edge, hook the Hoffman Apparatus up to many photo voltaic cells to separate the ocean's saltwater into H2 and O2, collect the O2, run the H2 into a combustible engine (to power something) and then collect the exhaust which would be fresh water (H2O)?

[sky21phoenix]

genius!!!!!!!!

but it would be free energy and the wealthy couldnt make money on the poor sheep that want to be economically enslaved

[GetMeThere1]

That's kind of an interesting idea, actually. The problem with distillation is the DELUSION that you get pure water--you don't, you get EVERYTHING that's equally or more volatile than water. By your method, you get the ultimate in pure water--and get a useful energy source as well.

[ahseph89]

1) its not economically feasible - energy obtained not able to power anything big, but the money used to make it is.

2) maintenance-no one will come n check how its going every now and then for free. and again money to maintain it.

3) practically you dont get sunlight ALL day long. one of the major set-back of solar energy. and the sun is not stagnant.

[stelerscyth]

I don't think you see the purpose of this technology. There is a finite amout of fresh drinking water on out planet. Countries that do not have access to fresh water are in desperate need for drinkable water(Africa).

This technology is 17 years old. Who are you to criticize something that could be drastically improved. You must be living under a rock and have no sense of humanism.

[ahseph89]

well if i'm living under rock then you must be living on moon. i've in no way commented that this thing is not going to be useful. i'm just stating the fact that there are still alot of problems faced by it, and to tell that Jdlifsey guy above that it is not possible to do what he wants to do. I myself is in this field of research. 17 years later, nothing much has changed.

[maxhassouna]

@Jdlifsey would you be able to supply technical drawings or specs for what u r suggesting?

cheers

max

[sky21phoenix]

I do not know I am still looking for the fellow.

[alex681219]

15 years later what hapends whith this tech? evolutinate or disapear?