Part One Shorter - Continuos Pieces 911 - Jeff Hill - Pumpitout

[nazirdjon]

by the shape of the wreckage Pentagon was NOT hit by a plane. The buildings were indeed hit by the plane. wouldn't everybody think this way?

[ChristianHolloway7]

watch this canadian cunt everyone. hes slowly taking all his phone calls/videos off the net. anyone with phone calls mp3 please upload.

[piwacket33]

Back it up to 2:51 or so and keep your eye on the bottom rhs of the screen at 2:56 something zooms in from a lower elevation, advances really fast, peaks and "flies" away in a descending arc. Could be an insect, but I make no assumptions when it comes to 9/11 anymore.

[OutofBoxExperience]

Is it so hard to believe that Jeff Hill works for the BBC?

[pumpitout]

The BBC, where the heck did you come up with that one, ha, ha, ha!!!

[07august]

So many videos were doctored after the fact. So many people were paid to lie, ie be eyewitnesses.

The videos ARE fake.

[2JOHNNYT]

Whats so hard to believe that they flew something into the buildings - plane, drone, missile - but the videos are faked to cover whatever was sent in. Obviously, when no wreckage of the 4 planes that day are recovered a REASONABLE person can assume THERE WERE NO PLANES.

[07august]

It was a PVI virtual image generated on the helicopter shot. Time for you all to learn about virtual imaging which is the descendant of smart bomb technology from Persian Gulf War. 5 lines have to be plotted on a camera shot to create a wireframe on a camera shot. It is not complicated. You see PVI images generated on football fields every week during football season. Google, PVI, learn the technology and learn how easy it is to create virtual advertising.

No hologram, but PVI virtual image.

[2JOHNNYT]

So You're saying it was a PVI image on tv, like the yellow first down line they always have, you're not saying that people on the street, on the scene that day saw this PVI image fly overhead - only people on tv correct?