Added: 5 years ago
From: DrMontague
Views: 9,957
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I love bryson.

  • that owl rocks! :D

  • I wonder if Kent Hovind has watched this series of lectures. I suspect he has, the stupid lying bastard.

  • Kunt Hovind A biologist! Hovind can't tell his arse from his elbow.

  • Religious believers are damned if they do and damned if they don't. If they don't watch lectures like this, then they can't know what they are missing; if they do watch lectures like this, then they can't accept anything that presents palpable evidence against their god because by doing so they are sinning.

    I've heard believers say that the better the proof is against their god, the more it proves to them that the Devil is clever and very convincing and the more they will blindly believe.

  • Yeah I've heard that as well, it must be hard for them, it means that whether they like it or not if they choose a religious path they will be left behind.

    On the other hand of course look at how the church first viewed Astronomy and how it has now come around to believing science they will do anything to keep their flock and I think eventually when the establishment in the churches accept evolution the sheep will follow and just add a sub line saying yeah but god pushed the evolution button.

  • "And God said: "Let there be evolution", and the animals and plants started to evolve."

    (Abiogenesis 1:24)

    ;)

  • yup that sounds about right tee hee

  • He's a fraud, not deceptive. He's not stupid; he knows he's preaching lies. But by doing so, he (used to) line his pockets with the money of fools.

    He needs to know the information in order to come up with convincing ways to steer people away from it.

  • Clinton Richard Dawkins, FRS, FRSL Dawkins was appointed Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science in the University of Oxford, a position that had been endowed by Charles Simonyi with the express intention that the holder "be expected to make important contributions to the public understanding of some scientific field". Since 1970, he has been a fellow of New College, Oxford. In September 2008, he retired from Oxford.

    Top universities take on liars?! You really are a fuckwit!

  • I was talking about Kent Hovind, but thanks for not viewing my comment in context, then insulting me and blocking me from contacting you to show your error, fuckwit!

    You'll more than likely just block this account too, because that's the only way to deal with someone, right?

    Censoring your comments makes you no better than the creationist propaganda spewers. Freedom of speech means that other people are allowed to say things that you don't like! Learn to deal with it!

    Fuckwit.

  • Then make your statements clear. There no mention of kunt hovind in your comment. Therefore it gave the impression as being an attack on Dawkins. Freedom of speech is one thing, freedom of blatant lying is another, and this is what creationists are fond of doing. I do not entertain liars or pig headed ignorant people on my channel, just as I don't invite such fuckwits into my home. They are given the chance to chance to comment something they never allow those who disagree with them to do!

  • Any accredited university or college would require perspective students to pass an interview or entrance exam to show that they have the ability to pass the course. People with internet access have NO excuse to be pig headed ignorant of evolutionary theory. I do not control the media, I only control my own channel. People who blatantly lie, and those who stubbornly refuse to educate themselves will get given the fucking boot right off my channel. Why? Because they are FUCKWITS, Liars,or BOTH.

  • Creationists just have wing stub envy.

  • lol, i like how dawkins stroked the owl but not the eagle:P i don blame him they are dangerous:P

  • This is my favorite segment of the lecture.

  • Dawkins continues to enlighten the masses. A true hero.

  • I love Richard Dawkins but he says squirrel in the funniest way I can possibly imagine. XD

  • It's an amusing little thing us British folk call "speaking English".

    For some reason it's never caught on in America.

  • It depends on your upbringing. Dawkins is middle class. We don't all speak this in th UK, that is, as if we have a plumb stuck in our mouths.

  • I was not making fun of his accent in a general way. When I heard him pronounce squirrel it immediately struck me as sounding peculiar. I, in all honesty, wish I could speak as eloquently as Professor Dawkins. There is no harm in finding humor in this single utterance of a word. We all say things funny at times.

  • Relax. I was only joking too.

  • Oh! I'm fine. Just letting people know that I respect him highly. Also, I don't want to offend anybody. That is the last thing I want to do. Just trying to communicate what I meant. :D

  • Some species of frogs and better known squirrels, (the pet sugar glider, and rocky with out bullwinkle) glid down from trees. The frogs drop down from the canopy becuase it's to much effot to climb back down.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more