@ikram505 From your comments you seem to be a brainwashed mainstream pawn with hardly any substantial knowledge. People like you are responsible for the loss of freedoms and overall health, look up the facts. And are for sure good consumers of FDA approved Aspartame diet drinks, GMO ridden foods, etc. And you will become the big burden on society since you believe the corporate slaves of the FDA approving all sorts of toxins and limit access to real nourishing and healthy foods and medicines.
Wow...the comments on this contain the biggest amount of brainwashed statist idiocy I have seen in a while. Fucking idiots still somehow believe that there is something within the state that serves them.
yeah, we get it... the FDA is corrupted, that's obvious. But completely destroying government regulation will not help anyone. Are you eager for the day that your child develops a treatable illness but there is no way to know what medicines will help them?
Well he is a doctor so he would know what drugs to provide his own children the better question would be if you asked about other peoples kids, what if someone who has no knowledge of these drugs goes out and buys a drug that doesnt help their child it in facts kills them? what then? the fda is there to prevent deaths, yes they are corrupt, they are out for money just like everyone else but is it really worth taking a risk like that? thats a real question.
My other question is... states cant do this? Why not? Why does this have to be a national burden? The people where you live the legislators where you live could care less about you but the national level is the way to go? There is a state level alternative, yes the tax burden on people living in that state would go up pretty high but isnt that the price you pay for wanting to be safe?
He's telling the truth! A few years back the FDA tried to take over the heath food industy. I think because the big drug companys wanted to get rid of the compatition. The FDA has studied some suplements and they work. While we watch TV ads saying to get involved with our care, most Dr.s will treat you like your crazy if you question them about your care. Contro, money, control, money!!!!!! I think I've made my point. Peace
You people are psychos! There were no bad drugs before the FDA?! There were plenty! People died, babies were born without arms and many other horror stories. Why do you think the FDA was formed then? It was terrible, all of you agreeing with this moron have never taken a pharmacology class and just talk out of your ignorant buts. Drugs take forever to get on the market for a reason, and 90% fail for a reason! I think this guy is a corrupt doctor, he even wants to lower doctor malpractice laws.
The one problem people have with the FDA is the government telling you what you can put in your body. If you know your stuff and you are willing to take the risk and take a drug that isnt FDA approved that is your right but most of the time the government tries to stop you because it isnt FDA approved. I think the laws need to change a bit, give a little more leway rather than just saying fuck you FDA go away, because thats always an initial reaction to someone telling you what to do.
@scienceatheism Why would you want to take something that is dangerous? There are side effects of drugs on the market and they are listed on the bottle and those drugs are taken because the benefits outweigh the risks, the ones that are not FDA approved have the risks out weigh the benefits. And ppl dont know "their stuff" not everyone is a scientist and most rely on google and youtube, which is not a reliable source to do the job of the FDA for themselves.
So what if its dangerous, if the benefits out weigh the risks I say any citizen that is willing to take that risk has every right to, and for you and others to deny them of that is intruding on their personal life, their privacy and their right to survive in any way they see fit. Most? Im talking about people who go out and search for information not only on google but with law firms, with books and various other things, really do their research on the drug they want to take.
@scienceatheism clearly u didnt understand what I wrote, I said if the benefit out weighs the risk then its considered safe to take, not the other way round like risk outweighing benefit, like if I want to take an acne medication but the side effect is death then no its not going to be FDA approved but if its a drug to treat a terminal illness and the side effect is a skin rash then yes the FDA will approve it. nd Cancer drugs that are proven to work are approved the ones that dont are not
And you dont understand my statement.. Im not saying that a drug that just gives you a skin rash is FDA approved. We are talking about Drugs that have both risks and benefits. The drug could lead to death, other health issues but said drug could also be the answer to your terminal illness. These are the drugs Im fighting over not something as simple as some acne medication or a drug that just gives you a rash.
@scienceatheism yes and like I told you, drugs are approved based on the condition and the risk vs benefits, if the condition is a terminal illness then the risks can be death and the drug can still be approved if the benefit may be a cure. Cancer drugs are not 100% safe and everyone knows it but if its either you're guaranteed to die or you may have a chance with chemo then you take chemo. when it comes to a drug for a terminal illness if its not approved that means it doesnt work! aka a scam!
No it does not mean that automatically, it does not mean a scam automatically. It means it doesnt fit the FDA's criteria of what is safe and what is beneficial to society and or the drug companies. That means one person can lose out on a potential life saving drug simply because FDA makes that drug look like a scam because they havnt approved of it yet, it takes years for it to be approved. In the mean time, lets just suffer in silence. You arnt taking into account case by case issues my friend.
@scienceatheism you clearly know nothing about the FDA, it doesnt meet the FDA's criteria meaning its unsafe! it takes years to approve because its still being tested for safety and I wouldnt want them to rush that very important step in the clinical trials. I dont know why you ppl insist that everyone is out to get you, or that the FDA purposely wants to kill you,
@scienceatheism I kinda wana say fuck you, go ahead and waste your money on something that does nothing, but I wouldnt cuz I know ur ass will end up being a burden on the health care system, these scams prey on the desperate like dying patients which is disgusting, its like psychics telling ppl their child is alive when theyre actually dead. I actually care about the lives of ppl even if they're stupid, these scams only care about money same with RP, he even supports health insurance comapanies
For someone who I see and can tell is rational It seems you want to force your rationalization on others in a way where they cant be the master of their own domain unless given permission by our society they cant take a risk with their own life. If you are a cancer patient and you see a drug that can help you but it isnt approved by the FDA and you see great progression in the studies of this drug (FDA hasnt approved it) do you lay there and die or do you fight for your right to take that drug?
@scienceatheism some ppl are morons and would defend their "right" to take a dangerous supplement because they say its their choice and theyre too stupid to know what the supplement is actually doing, Ive heard some stupid examples of some things that ppl want to do and theyre out raged that the FDA says not to do it, like drinking raw milk, one idiot was out raged that they said it was bad for you and he was preaching about it as if he was a scientist but every1 knows u need to pasteurize milk
So what? Its their body. Stop telling them what they can or cant do. If they want to sell raw milk to people they can go ahead, just let them know if they are a cause of someones death they will be either brought up on charges or sued but it is peoples right, to do what they want with their body no matter how you and I feel about it. No matter how stupid it is, if we are going to start regulating on peoples body might as well tell them to stop douching their face up with all those piercings.
@scienceatheism No you need to stop with this "its their choice" bull shit, the health care system does not need to treat preventable illness caused by morons on themselves. You can get e-coli and salmonella by drinking raw milk so no I'm not letting some idiot poison ppl, and these ppl dont know its dangerous because they are stupid and are only preaching nonsense cuz ppl like u are telling them their freedom is being taken away, they dont want to get E-coli or else they would drink sewer water
I need to stop with this its their choice bullshit? So you want to live their life for them is what you are saying? So people are stupid and idiots therefore we must coddle them from the minute they wake up from the minute they fall asleep and if we dont they could kill themselves? sorry who are you? I didnt realize I lived for you. Do you feed me? Fuck me? or Pay me? No? So let me do what I want. Im going to go drink raw milk later just piss you off. Might kill me but hey its worth the point.
@scienceatheism That post was just plain immature with no real point. Are you a doctor? How about next time ppl need brain surgery they should do it themselves since we shouldnt coddle ppl. these organizations are made to ensure the safety of the public because not everyone has a science degree. you just sound like a moron and cannot understand reason. The health care system should have to pay for your arrogance and stupidity, if they say raw milk has causes E-coli, then wtf are you fighting it?
Yes, it was childish, because if you are going to treat me like a child and act like my fucking mother, Im going to act like a baby. You get in return on how you treat people, if you treat them like responsible adults, individuals then you dont get that kind of response. See how that works? Is that coddling them? Paying for yourself to get better? Wow we have different definitions of coddling then. Im fighting for peoples right to their own body. Thats what Im fighting for.
This is the best, most accurate video I have ever seen! As a doctor's wife, I can tell you, Dr. Paul is telling the truth! He is the ONLY person I have EVER heard stand up to the FDA! He is OUR HERO!!!! Thank you for sharing....do you mind if I copy?
"People weren't dying of bad drugs before we had the FDA."
Either he's ignorant, or totally cool with lying to people. If people weren't dying of bad drugs before the FDA, I have a horse named Jim I'd like to sell him.
A lot of scientists would be very happy without the FDA breathing down their necks, but the FDA isn't all bureaucrats, there are a lot of scientists like Francis Kelsey who prevented the selling of Thalidomide. I agree that people should be free to choose which drugs they put in their bodies, but then I think of all the snake oil salesmen and the people they take advantage of. I agree with RP's message of liberty, but fear it will be bad for stupid people who are now protected by government.
We got the FDA the year I was born 1988. What did we do all that time before? It was probably better. With or without an FDA there will be drugs you shouldn't put in your body. We need to get to the doctors and medical people deciding what we need instead of bureaucrats. I mean what does a doctor spend 8 years of school for? I like Paul he's smart. And his solution is that if a state feels they need this let the state establish it. Then if another state doesn't let them do it. And COMPETE.
@jneil2007 yeah probably better if you think dying from cold medication is ok. and the doctor isnt going to be there whether or not you should be taking cough syrup, ever heard of over the counter drugs? Oh unless you want there to be a prescription for everything, I'm sure you'd love that. The FDA needs to be there so I can know the stuff in the pharmacy shelves wont kill me. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about, go look up why the FDA was formed.
@ikram505 From your comments you seem to be a brainwashed mainstream pawn with hardly any substantial knowledge. People like you are responsible for the loss of freedoms and overall health, look up the facts. And are for sure good consumers of FDA approved Aspartame diet drinks, GMO ridden foods, etc. And you will become the big burden on society since you believe the corporate slaves of the FDA approving all sorts of toxins and limit access to real nourishing and healthy foods and medicines.
dbriedel 1 hour ago
Wow...the comments on this contain the biggest amount of brainwashed statist idiocy I have seen in a while. Fucking idiots still somehow believe that there is something within the state that serves them.
canubelieve 23 hours ago
I'm going to link this to my video if ok with you :) Music video The FDA IS IN OUR WAY
seahorsemomma 1 week ago
yeah, we get it... the FDA is corrupted, that's obvious. But completely destroying government regulation will not help anyone. Are you eager for the day that your child develops a treatable illness but there is no way to know what medicines will help them?
Jraiser786 1 week ago
Well he is a doctor so he would know what drugs to provide his own children the better question would be if you asked about other peoples kids, what if someone who has no knowledge of these drugs goes out and buys a drug that doesnt help their child it in facts kills them? what then? the fda is there to prevent deaths, yes they are corrupt, they are out for money just like everyone else but is it really worth taking a risk like that? thats a real question.
scienceatheism 3 hours ago
My other question is... states cant do this? Why not? Why does this have to be a national burden? The people where you live the legislators where you live could care less about you but the national level is the way to go? There is a state level alternative, yes the tax burden on people living in that state would go up pretty high but isnt that the price you pay for wanting to be safe?
scienceatheism 3 hours ago
Dr. Paul is really decided to finish an era and restart The Nation from (almost) zero!
jvblg 1 week ago
He's telling the truth! A few years back the FDA tried to take over the heath food industy. I think because the big drug companys wanted to get rid of the compatition. The FDA has studied some suplements and they work. While we watch TV ads saying to get involved with our care, most Dr.s will treat you like your crazy if you question them about your care. Contro, money, control, money!!!!!! I think I've made my point. Peace
TheHambo58 2 weeks ago
You people are psychos! There were no bad drugs before the FDA?! There were plenty! People died, babies were born without arms and many other horror stories. Why do you think the FDA was formed then? It was terrible, all of you agreeing with this moron have never taken a pharmacology class and just talk out of your ignorant buts. Drugs take forever to get on the market for a reason, and 90% fail for a reason! I think this guy is a corrupt doctor, he even wants to lower doctor malpractice laws.
ikram505 3 weeks ago
@ikram505 youtube.com/watch?v=ZbyY3jqvVBQ
PrudenceWright 10 hours ago
The one problem people have with the FDA is the government telling you what you can put in your body. If you know your stuff and you are willing to take the risk and take a drug that isnt FDA approved that is your right but most of the time the government tries to stop you because it isnt FDA approved. I think the laws need to change a bit, give a little more leway rather than just saying fuck you FDA go away, because thats always an initial reaction to someone telling you what to do.
scienceatheism 3 hours ago
@scienceatheism Why would you want to take something that is dangerous? There are side effects of drugs on the market and they are listed on the bottle and those drugs are taken because the benefits outweigh the risks, the ones that are not FDA approved have the risks out weigh the benefits. And ppl dont know "their stuff" not everyone is a scientist and most rely on google and youtube, which is not a reliable source to do the job of the FDA for themselves.
ikram505 3 hours ago
So what if its dangerous, if the benefits out weigh the risks I say any citizen that is willing to take that risk has every right to, and for you and others to deny them of that is intruding on their personal life, their privacy and their right to survive in any way they see fit. Most? Im talking about people who go out and search for information not only on google but with law firms, with books and various other things, really do their research on the drug they want to take.
scienceatheism 3 hours ago
@scienceatheism clearly u didnt understand what I wrote, I said if the benefit out weighs the risk then its considered safe to take, not the other way round like risk outweighing benefit, like if I want to take an acne medication but the side effect is death then no its not going to be FDA approved but if its a drug to treat a terminal illness and the side effect is a skin rash then yes the FDA will approve it. nd Cancer drugs that are proven to work are approved the ones that dont are not
ikram505 2 hours ago
And you dont understand my statement.. Im not saying that a drug that just gives you a skin rash is FDA approved. We are talking about Drugs that have both risks and benefits. The drug could lead to death, other health issues but said drug could also be the answer to your terminal illness. These are the drugs Im fighting over not something as simple as some acne medication or a drug that just gives you a rash.
scienceatheism 2 hours ago
@scienceatheism yes and like I told you, drugs are approved based on the condition and the risk vs benefits, if the condition is a terminal illness then the risks can be death and the drug can still be approved if the benefit may be a cure. Cancer drugs are not 100% safe and everyone knows it but if its either you're guaranteed to die or you may have a chance with chemo then you take chemo. when it comes to a drug for a terminal illness if its not approved that means it doesnt work! aka a scam!
ikram505 2 hours ago
No it does not mean that automatically, it does not mean a scam automatically. It means it doesnt fit the FDA's criteria of what is safe and what is beneficial to society and or the drug companies. That means one person can lose out on a potential life saving drug simply because FDA makes that drug look like a scam because they havnt approved of it yet, it takes years for it to be approved. In the mean time, lets just suffer in silence. You arnt taking into account case by case issues my friend.
scienceatheism 2 hours ago
@scienceatheism you clearly know nothing about the FDA, it doesnt meet the FDA's criteria meaning its unsafe! it takes years to approve because its still being tested for safety and I wouldnt want them to rush that very important step in the clinical trials. I dont know why you ppl insist that everyone is out to get you, or that the FDA purposely wants to kill you,
ikram505 2 hours ago
@scienceatheism I kinda wana say fuck you, go ahead and waste your money on something that does nothing, but I wouldnt cuz I know ur ass will end up being a burden on the health care system, these scams prey on the desperate like dying patients which is disgusting, its like psychics telling ppl their child is alive when theyre actually dead. I actually care about the lives of ppl even if they're stupid, these scams only care about money same with RP, he even supports health insurance comapanies
ikram505 2 hours ago
For someone who I see and can tell is rational It seems you want to force your rationalization on others in a way where they cant be the master of their own domain unless given permission by our society they cant take a risk with their own life. If you are a cancer patient and you see a drug that can help you but it isnt approved by the FDA and you see great progression in the studies of this drug (FDA hasnt approved it) do you lay there and die or do you fight for your right to take that drug?
scienceatheism 2 hours ago
@scienceatheism some ppl are morons and would defend their "right" to take a dangerous supplement because they say its their choice and theyre too stupid to know what the supplement is actually doing, Ive heard some stupid examples of some things that ppl want to do and theyre out raged that the FDA says not to do it, like drinking raw milk, one idiot was out raged that they said it was bad for you and he was preaching about it as if he was a scientist but every1 knows u need to pasteurize milk
ikram505 3 hours ago
So what? Its their body. Stop telling them what they can or cant do. If they want to sell raw milk to people they can go ahead, just let them know if they are a cause of someones death they will be either brought up on charges or sued but it is peoples right, to do what they want with their body no matter how you and I feel about it. No matter how stupid it is, if we are going to start regulating on peoples body might as well tell them to stop douching their face up with all those piercings.
scienceatheism 2 hours ago
@scienceatheism No you need to stop with this "its their choice" bull shit, the health care system does not need to treat preventable illness caused by morons on themselves. You can get e-coli and salmonella by drinking raw milk so no I'm not letting some idiot poison ppl, and these ppl dont know its dangerous because they are stupid and are only preaching nonsense cuz ppl like u are telling them their freedom is being taken away, they dont want to get E-coli or else they would drink sewer water
ikram505 2 hours ago
I need to stop with this its their choice bullshit? So you want to live their life for them is what you are saying? So people are stupid and idiots therefore we must coddle them from the minute they wake up from the minute they fall asleep and if we dont they could kill themselves? sorry who are you? I didnt realize I lived for you. Do you feed me? Fuck me? or Pay me? No? So let me do what I want. Im going to go drink raw milk later just piss you off. Might kill me but hey its worth the point.
scienceatheism 2 hours ago
@scienceatheism That post was just plain immature with no real point. Are you a doctor? How about next time ppl need brain surgery they should do it themselves since we shouldnt coddle ppl. these organizations are made to ensure the safety of the public because not everyone has a science degree. you just sound like a moron and cannot understand reason. The health care system should have to pay for your arrogance and stupidity, if they say raw milk has causes E-coli, then wtf are you fighting it?
ikram505 2 hours ago
Yes, it was childish, because if you are going to treat me like a child and act like my fucking mother, Im going to act like a baby. You get in return on how you treat people, if you treat them like responsible adults, individuals then you dont get that kind of response. See how that works? Is that coddling them? Paying for yourself to get better? Wow we have different definitions of coddling then. Im fighting for peoples right to their own body. Thats what Im fighting for.
scienceatheism 2 hours ago
am i the only one to see this is the only person fit to run our country....WTF
keslermotorsports 3 weeks ago
WHY IS THIS NOT VIRAL?
seahorsemomma 1 month ago 3
@seahorsemomma Like it, EVERYONE LIKE IT!
HappyStPhilmore 19 hours ago
This is the best, most accurate video I have ever seen! As a doctor's wife, I can tell you, Dr. Paul is telling the truth! He is the ONLY person I have EVER heard stand up to the FDA! He is OUR HERO!!!! Thank you for sharing....do you mind if I copy?
seahorsemomma 1 month ago 5
"People weren't dying of bad drugs before we had the FDA."
Either he's ignorant, or totally cool with lying to people. If people weren't dying of bad drugs before the FDA, I have a horse named Jim I'd like to sell him.
ItStartsAtDusK 1 month ago
A lot of scientists would be very happy without the FDA breathing down their necks, but the FDA isn't all bureaucrats, there are a lot of scientists like Francis Kelsey who prevented the selling of Thalidomide. I agree that people should be free to choose which drugs they put in their bodies, but then I think of all the snake oil salesmen and the people they take advantage of. I agree with RP's message of liberty, but fear it will be bad for stupid people who are now protected by government.
sean6006 1 month ago
G-d Bless Ron Paul, for telling the truth..This video should be VIRAL!!!
seahorsemomma 1 month ago
We got the FDA the year I was born 1988. What did we do all that time before? It was probably better. With or without an FDA there will be drugs you shouldn't put in your body. We need to get to the doctors and medical people deciding what we need instead of bureaucrats. I mean what does a doctor spend 8 years of school for? I like Paul he's smart. And his solution is that if a state feels they need this let the state establish it. Then if another state doesn't let them do it. And COMPETE.
jneil2007 1 month ago
@jneil2007 yeah probably better if you think dying from cold medication is ok. and the doctor isnt going to be there whether or not you should be taking cough syrup, ever heard of over the counter drugs? Oh unless you want there to be a prescription for everything, I'm sure you'd love that. The FDA needs to be there so I can know the stuff in the pharmacy shelves wont kill me. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about, go look up why the FDA was formed.
ikram505 3 weeks ago
@jneil2007 *Doctor isnt going to be there (to tell) you whether or not.......
ikram505 3 weeks ago
Why are there only 430 views???!!!! This needs to go viral!!!! This is the absolute truth and only Ron Paul loves us enough to tell us!!!!
seahorsemomma 1 month ago 2
I love Ron Paul. This man speaks the truth.
metaphysicalsource 1 month ago
Ron Paul. A breath of fresh air. Better still, oxygen for liberty on life support.
lmtlsss 2 months ago
they gonna kill this guy. they must!! but i pray that YAH keeps him in perfect peace we must pray ppl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
yashar254 2 months ago
I love how Ron Paul talks for real. He is not a slogan machine like most politician
mmanouvelles 2 months ago