I am sure the master would have preferred the crisp sound rather than the old 78 scratches although no doubt it is the scratches that bring back some fond memories to you and others. As music has a place at different times throughout our life. Another fine job Tom
Tom, like you I also prefer the original version with all the pops and scratches. Sounds much more authentic. There is a recently downloaded version now available on YouTube that is played on a Victor III. It is quite good. Thank you so much for all you do to keep the master from being forgotten.
I started singing along & noted how easy it seemed. I then checked & he recorded it a half step down. It hardly matters, it is absolutely magnificent.
@eldonfitz: I'm an untrained person myself (totally untrained, in fact...), I don't know the first thing about singing ! I'm just emotionally touched by Caruso's heart when he sings. That's why I keep uploading his art. Some like the remasterings, some not. Some like the original 78's and don't mind the needle noise. Others can enjoy his voice with a newly done orchestration. Who is right or wrong is not the issue; it's what YOU like. Any way a person can enjoy his singing, is fine with me!
All these digital 'dubs' need to 'mike up' his voice louder. However, I enjoy hearing these over Nat Shilkret's dubs of the '30s. I'm 47 and have listened to his records my whole lifetime. Good job!
@kjpportland I don't agree; the difference between this and the "O Sole Mio" done on a subsequent CD is that the reverb of the hall that the orchestra is in should be matched by the voice; that other recording gets that more right, hence the effect of "balance" is better.
This has the more of the flatness of the original acoustic recording, done very close up with no room acoustics; they could have done a better job of matching the voice to the orchestra.
I am sure the master would have preferred the crisp sound rather than the old 78 scratches although no doubt it is the scratches that bring back some fond memories to you and others. As music has a place at different times throughout our life. Another fine job Tom
RyersonRobert 1 month ago
BRAVO CRUSO!!!!
IRA77GEOTENORE 1 month ago
Why somebody dont do the same thing with Callas's Live recordings?It would be amazing!
MariaCallasLegend 10 months ago
@MariaCallasLegend Good question. Would be great !
tomfroekjaer 10 months ago
Tom, like you I also prefer the original version with all the pops and scratches. Sounds much more authentic. There is a recently downloaded version now available on YouTube that is played on a Victor III. It is quite good. Thank you so much for all you do to keep the master from being forgotten.
lewashcliffe 1 year ago
@lewashcliffe: thanks, Lewis. Found it via your channel. This is the real stuff !
Wish I had a Victor III and all of his 78's...
tomfroekjaer 1 year ago
Tom,
I started singing along & noted how easy it seemed. I then checked & he recorded it a half step down. It hardly matters, it is absolutely magnificent.
Doug
Lovelytenor1 1 year ago
Thanks for posting and for your hard work remastering.
minnie888444 1 year ago
He is good I who '"nt spend tometos onyou
joopmar6 1 year ago
@eldonfitz: I'm an untrained person myself (totally untrained, in fact...), I don't know the first thing about singing ! I'm just emotionally touched by Caruso's heart when he sings. That's why I keep uploading his art. Some like the remasterings, some not. Some like the original 78's and don't mind the needle noise. Others can enjoy his voice with a newly done orchestration. Who is right or wrong is not the issue; it's what YOU like. Any way a person can enjoy his singing, is fine with me!
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
All these digital 'dubs' need to 'mike up' his voice louder. However, I enjoy hearing these over Nat Shilkret's dubs of the '30s. I'm 47 and have listened to his records my whole lifetime. Good job!
kjpportland 2 years ago
@kjpportland I don't agree; the difference between this and the "O Sole Mio" done on a subsequent CD is that the reverb of the hall that the orchestra is in should be matched by the voice; that other recording gets that more right, hence the effect of "balance" is better.
This has the more of the flatness of the original acoustic recording, done very close up with no room acoustics; they could have done a better job of matching the voice to the orchestra.
SatchmoSings 1 year ago
Very satisfying. Enrico at his very best.
And you too.
The seldom seen photo is a delight.
Thank you very much indeed.
klokheten 2 years ago
I thank you, Bengt !
Tom
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
I love remasterings!!
alber6161 2 years ago
I'm relieved that not everybody is "against" me :-)
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
He waited to 1918 before the took on this role on stage.
XP11XP 2 years ago
Didn't know that - it was usually the other way around. A heck of a challenge singing this part ...
Thanks for the info.
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
Remastered or not - it's just the same: Caruso either way remain Caruso. Thanks for a sharing!
M.
maldoror26 2 years ago 2
I think so too. No matter if original, enhanced or remastered, one can still hear him in his wonderful voice !
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
"and "ruined" with new orchestration in Vienna around 1995."
That was hilarious. :-P
"Remastering?? BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO"!!
Bravo, 'o tu che sei fare tutti questi miracoli colla voce'. (Italian?)
LordMgls 2 years ago
Ruined: just trying to fend off potential attacks on my person :-)
Remasterings: BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !
Italian: sounds Italian ....
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago
Remastering?? BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
:P
Actually this doesn't sound bad. ;-) Wonderful singing as usual.
ShawDAMAN 2 years ago
:-) - at least in this one the orchestra doesn't much compete with his voice. Thanks...
tomfroekjaer 2 years ago