ONE OF THE UNSOLVED ISSUES FOUND WAS.. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PEOPLE WHO CAN.. AND CANNOT TELL.. maybe you could redo the experiment using different subjects, like people who live lives in the more "aware" state such as soldiers, fighters, gangsters. These kinds of people usually have better awareness in surroundings because they live life with a neccesity to do so. there is also a small amount of other people who DO have "better" awareness skills like people with minor ADD, other shit
Now, how many of you noticed that the first time Prof Daniel J Simons appeared he wore a red shirt, but the next time he appeared his shirt was blue? ;)
what i think is you should always take in mind that every person is somewhere different in their psyche depending on their short past and events which will then affect their mental state at that given time. eg A is thinking about the conversation he had with his girlfriend and replaying the senario in his head, while B has nothing much going in his head at that given time and is more open to information around him.
I will conclude this by saying this experiment in a failure
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate than the word "gay".
A person does not need religion, hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important, qualitative differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption.
Homosexual activists, with complete support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims and martyrs; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
I'm just letting you all know here, this is an invalid experiment. I thought it was real at first, but its not that its fake - its just the second man that arises up from the counter begins to give her instruction - it is not that they think it is one person or don't remember - because most females would. It's just that most people who are peons in a study will accept the command of authority. Especially if it has to do with the consent form - or if they're just expected to move instead of gosit
@doomality Its not invalid, its just one of many experiments like this. Your not making sense in your logic. The experiment is about finding out what percentage of a given population which seems in this one experiment to be students of all ages, if they can identify two different people that are similar in appearance. Sound like you don't understand how these experiments work. The whole idea is to find out how people behave and how our brain works. Not a reality tv show.
@Kiljoy616 i do understand - its got no particular demographic. its a random sample of students coming in, but where do they provide data? where do they say, okay, these students identified the change and these ones didn't. they explain the experiment in such a way that it is oversimplistic, and you cannot just trust all experiments that do not provide you the proper numbers, or procedure. its not the actual sample thats wrong - it is just an experiment that cannot draw inference.
@Kiljoy616: 1) What you're watching here it's a synthetic VIDEO of the experiments done, not the experiment itself. Therefore, you don't have enough scientific elements to judge the experiment here, you can only assess what the VIDEO says (and there's quite a big difference between the two things: a synthetic video is not an experiment).
@kiljoy616 2) I don't really understand the conclusion of your comment. We do draw interesting & correct inferences from such experiments: can you prove the contrary? Besides, and more in general, remember that human mind/brain's have been selected also for their ability to draw tendentially correct inferences. Also Experimental Pragmatics suggests that, given a context of assumptions made up of both verbal and non-verbal information, we do draw correct inferences even from a word or a sentence.
I think a lot of this has to do with two things: 1) Societal conditioning. We are conditioned to see people more like generic "roles", for example these guys are just "the guy at the desk". They don't see them as a person....the second thing is the color and voice similarity. Their shirts are different colors, but their ties match their shirts exactly. The colors are all one palette. This probably affects them visually. The similarities are too strong for this to be really conclusive.
@TheInfamousBertman I don't think this is Social Conditioning, this is hard wiring. This is just one of many types of studies showing how automated we really are. Social Conditioning is actually more with Religion and norms we expect society to abide by, food for example you eat is based on social conditioning, not everyone follows it but the majority of society would not tolerate what other people eat that their society find acceptable. Scorpions, monkeys, dog, tarantulas...
@VeroniqueVex911 Simple the brain has limitation and it can't process everything. Same reason you may have something right in front of you and you still don't see it. Our brain is not that good. We just day dream it is.
Dont read this cause it actually works. u will be kissed in the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you do not post this comment on at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. now you started reading this, dont stop. This is so scary. Put this on at least 5 videos in 143 minutes and when your done, press F6 and your lover's name will appear on the screen in big letters. This is so scary cuz it actually works.
@DarthKrattus Nope wrong, actually they done this with more people and then had a guy in a gorilla suit go thought the crowd and people just did not see it. Educate your self first.
3. That would be a totally different concept. In that experiment, you are TOLD to concentrate on players, whereas in this one you are an active participant and are talking to the man anyway. To make your comparison fair, imagine if you were talking to a man and a second later he was wearing a gorilla suit.
@DarthKrattus Not necessarily, many don't even look at the face or hands, they are looking elsewhere, but you are still right, it would up the odds of someone noticing.
Many magic tricks use this very concept to make things appear and disappear. Except they are a bit more deliberate about hiding the change by misdirection.
Well I'm sure these people are from a wide array of subjects tested... but yes, this is a valid phenomena... there's actually a Derren Brown flick where he is replaced by people that look absolutely nothing like him....
REAL Free energy technology exists!But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be part of the revolution!
How many men noticed it and how many women noticed it. I feel like there was something involving sexuality that was a definite variable in this experiment.
@ThisGuysRetarded *nods* Woman tend to notice male change more and males seem to notice a woman changing more often. Like the doc said. If the focus is on the person they are more likely to spot the change.
Derren Brown also did a similar thing. 1 person went up to a random stranger and asked for them to point out a location on a map. Then they're interrupted by two people carrying a large painting, and the person with the map swaps with a painting carrier. At one point they switched a white man for a black man, and the person didn't notice. It's amazing how much our minds can ignore.
@TheBookArchive Stop doing psychological experiments in stupid America and them globalize it like every human on Earth is an idiot like that. Harvard...don't be a genius where there is no problem, not let personal branding or politics stand in the way of a great school history.
@ifdamian change blindness is a robust effect! It was not 'globalized' by americans. It's human cognition, and the experiment has been run THOUSANDS of times in all different countries.
@xmasterhand Then show me that! Show me the percentages in each country., Ok, i agree, the effect might have some scientific foundation, I'm not challenging that, i hate the generalization on psychological tests. Tell me the numbers in Russia, in Germany, in France, show me documentation, not just a 4 minute clip; this is neither educational, or truth, or funny or whatever. It's just a small PR scheme meant to have a Ooou effect on the common mind; It's commonly know as Bullsh*t.
i can link you to thousands of psychological studies conducted in different countries, i will inbox you if you really are this hard headed. Psychology does not generalize if the sample is not generalizable. It is a statistical science like any other science out there. If cognitive studies like this had never been conducted a wide variety of information about scene and object perception would never had been discovered. Perhaps before you make naive comments, try researching yourself.
@ifdamian your probably not intelligent enough to make an educated opinion yourself, or have the cognitive ability to read one of those articles. never mind , believe what you want to believe. I dont believe they would publish this effect in hundreds of textbooks all over the world if it were simply an Oooou effect.
anyway good luck with your life... youre either a child or a very very stupid person :)
@xmasterhand ...I'm not saying your stupid, but naive :) Psychology as a whole is not a fully fledged science; it has so many gaps and holes, especially in the research department, i really don't wanna get into it right now because it would take to much of my time right now and i don't consider your expertise as something to challenge, young padawan.
@xmasterhand If you made an assumption about me then let me make one about you: i believe you're a student that really doesn't know anything about the world, probably a masters in some wanna-be-future-cr*p-major science and guess what, good for you. You probably have it easy, surfing, living la vida loca, and that's all good, get your groove on but let the educated opinions to the educated ones and stay a mindless zombie, like a good boy.
@TheBookArchive No just you. This shows that most people don't see as much as they think. These experiments show that what a person may see is not what they actually saw. Like when people point out the wrong person to police. Now go back to bed your do in 5th grade tomorrow.
So what I want to know is how to overcome a more than moderate case of change blindness. It's a pain in the rear when you have to look and look for something that is in plain sight.
Or they naturally pay attention to people more because they are naturally more socially adept. Specifically only 1 of the examples that didn't notice was a women, and all of the people who did were women.
this experiment is kind of pointless. why study people reactions to meaningless changes? i wouldnt notice completely because i dont give a fuck about who im interacting with, i just care about what im doing. If a doctor left while i was getting a physical and a new one stepped in 5sec later i wouldnt notice.
@amarch20 Woah you sound educated, the point of this study was to prove the hypothesis, to prove SOMETHING. It doesn't have to change the world, just reveal evidence to support a claim. Simply because you don't get it right away doesn't mean its pointless.
@bazookafox Im just saying it seems obvious to me most people wouldn't notice because i for sure would not. And don't criticize my level of education; I'm in pharmacy school and your name is bazookafox. are you twelve? or just simple?
oh come on we all know what they say about lawyers......
jk. i guess you have a point. but the guy who ran this experiment even said the pattern could be based on coincidence. to really be valid the experiment would have to include more variables like race, gender, and eyesight to help reveal real patterns. i guess its a new theory i was a little quick to criticize.
Wow, that is amazing, the fact that those people walk around day to day, thinking they are totally aware seems to have been disproved. XD I love science.
People that notice something like this will go further in life by having some sort of awareness attribute and anyone who would call anybody a "retard" displays who they truly are. leave the part if you really are a Pub. You're a disgrace.
If you took time to notice, which you didn't and that makes you as dumb as the people in this video, you would realize (just take a look at your post) that no one has a clue who you are replying to when you use reply. So, that's why I use your name and don't use the reply button.
Your fries are now burned so you'll have to look for another job, please try to pay attention, and my balls are fine. You may now gargle them.
And it wasn't used as one. I suggest grammar classes and you sticking to skateboard nut-crack videos. Anything more than that could obviously make your head hurt.
I always look at their hair eyes then clothes when i see someone new :)
xxfiloxx 4 days ago
Put a short asian guy and a tall black guy to switch with each other. Lets see the statistics now.
lordzero545 2 weeks ago
yeah do the same with non americans / non retards. no wonder americans come up with those stupid psychological conclusions all the time
Caldaron 3 weeks ago
If you put two women and changed them i'm sure the guys would notice.
YouPhuk 1 month ago 3
ONE OF THE UNSOLVED ISSUES FOUND WAS.. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PEOPLE WHO CAN.. AND CANNOT TELL.. maybe you could redo the experiment using different subjects, like people who live lives in the more "aware" state such as soldiers, fighters, gangsters. These kinds of people usually have better awareness in surroundings because they live life with a neccesity to do so. there is also a small amount of other people who DO have "better" awareness skills like people with minor ADD, other shit
desychu 2 months ago
Now, how many of you noticed that the first time Prof Daniel J Simons appeared he wore a red shirt, but the next time he appeared his shirt was blue? ;)
Mardrommen 3 months ago 14
@Mardrommen
This comment can not be thumbed up enough.
Wolfzoon 2 months ago
maybe the 2 girls at the end was checking the counter guy out, so they noticed
popbic89 3 months ago
what i think is you should always take in mind that every person is somewhere different in their psyche depending on their short past and events which will then affect their mental state at that given time. eg A is thinking about the conversation he had with his girlfriend and replaying the senario in his head, while B has nothing much going in his head at that given time and is more open to information around him.
I will conclude this by saying this experiment in a failure
dogycy 3 months ago
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate than the word "gay".
A person does not need religion, hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important, qualitative differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption.
Homosexual activists, with complete support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims and martyrs; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 4 months ago
2:57 NUuhoo
stupitxshyxguy 4 months ago
Comment removed
stupitxshyxguy 4 months ago
I'm just letting you all know here, this is an invalid experiment. I thought it was real at first, but its not that its fake - its just the second man that arises up from the counter begins to give her instruction - it is not that they think it is one person or don't remember - because most females would. It's just that most people who are peons in a study will accept the command of authority. Especially if it has to do with the consent form - or if they're just expected to move instead of gosit
doomality 5 months ago
@doomality Its not invalid, its just one of many experiments like this. Your not making sense in your logic. The experiment is about finding out what percentage of a given population which seems in this one experiment to be students of all ages, if they can identify two different people that are similar in appearance. Sound like you don't understand how these experiments work. The whole idea is to find out how people behave and how our brain works. Not a reality tv show.
Kiljoy616 5 months ago
@Kiljoy616 i do understand - its got no particular demographic. its a random sample of students coming in, but where do they provide data? where do they say, okay, these students identified the change and these ones didn't. they explain the experiment in such a way that it is oversimplistic, and you cannot just trust all experiments that do not provide you the proper numbers, or procedure. its not the actual sample thats wrong - it is just an experiment that cannot draw inference.
doomality 5 months ago
@Kiljoy616: 1) What you're watching here it's a synthetic VIDEO of the experiments done, not the experiment itself. Therefore, you don't have enough scientific elements to judge the experiment here, you can only assess what the VIDEO says (and there's quite a big difference between the two things: a synthetic video is not an experiment).
Nonconceptualcontent 4 months ago
@kiljoy616 2) I don't really understand the conclusion of your comment. We do draw interesting & correct inferences from such experiments: can you prove the contrary? Besides, and more in general, remember that human mind/brain's have been selected also for their ability to draw tendentially correct inferences. Also Experimental Pragmatics suggests that, given a context of assumptions made up of both verbal and non-verbal information, we do draw correct inferences even from a word or a sentence.
Nonconceptualcontent 4 months ago
I read about this before, but it really makes me wonder what changes ive missed in my life.....
MackerLiverpool 6 months ago
I think a lot of this has to do with two things: 1) Societal conditioning. We are conditioned to see people more like generic "roles", for example these guys are just "the guy at the desk". They don't see them as a person....the second thing is the color and voice similarity. Their shirts are different colors, but their ties match their shirts exactly. The colors are all one palette. This probably affects them visually. The similarities are too strong for this to be really conclusive.
TheInfamousBertman 6 months ago
@TheInfamousBertman I don't think this is Social Conditioning, this is hard wiring. This is just one of many types of studies showing how automated we really are. Social Conditioning is actually more with Religion and norms we expect society to abide by, food for example you eat is based on social conditioning, not everyone follows it but the majority of society would not tolerate what other people eat that their society find acceptable. Scorpions, monkeys, dog, tarantulas...
Kiljoy616 5 months ago
I'm sure people noticed, they probably walked away with a "WTF going through their minds"
bLitz72 7 months ago
I'm not sure if I would have noticed. I never pay attencion.
22Presko 7 months ago
no one noticed that the professor's shirt changed?
first it's red then it's blue.
technicolourxo 7 months ago
How the FUCK do you NOT notice they switched?
VeroniqueVex911 7 months ago
@VeroniqueVex911 Simple the brain has limitation and it can't process everything. Same reason you may have something right in front of you and you still don't see it. Our brain is not that good. We just day dream it is.
Kiljoy616 5 months ago
Haha imagine a science where all you do is pull pranks on people. It's a dream come true!
adamtequalsgreat 7 months ago
@adamtequalsgreat But this prank does teach us about human limits which people tend to think are limitless.
Kiljoy616 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dont read this cause it actually works. u will be kissed in the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you do not post this comment on at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. now you started reading this, dont stop. This is so scary. Put this on at least 5 videos in 143 minutes and when your done, press F6 and your lover's name will appear on the screen in big letters. This is so scary cuz it actually works.
clipcina 8 months ago
I bet that if the second guy were black they would have noticed.
DarthKrattus 8 months ago 94
@DarthKrattus nope, there's another video in here where they change color and even gender. People don't notice.
jacs91 7 months ago 2
@DarthKrattus Nope wrong, actually they done this with more people and then had a guy in a gorilla suit go thought the crowd and people just did not see it. Educate your self first.
Kiljoy616 5 months ago
@Kiljoy616 1. I was joking. Calm down.
2. I have seen that experiment before.
3. That would be a totally different concept. In that experiment, you are TOLD to concentrate on players, whereas in this one you are an active participant and are talking to the man anyway. To make your comparison fair, imagine if you were talking to a man and a second later he was wearing a gorilla suit.
Educate yourself first.
DarthKrattus 5 months ago
@DarthKrattus Not necessarily, many don't even look at the face or hands, they are looking elsewhere, but you are still right, it would up the odds of someone noticing.
HostileHST 4 months ago
@HostileHST I know, ha ha. My comment was meant to be a joke; nothing more. I agree with you.
DarthKrattus 4 months ago
If you 'appreciate' one of the person's looks and the other, not as much, surely you'd notice the difference?
ScaryMaryCherry 9 months ago
People fail at seeing things that go right under their noses. Now tell me that 9/11 couldn't have been an inside job.
xXvolhvXx 9 months ago
shapeshifters, i would trip balls.
legalizethegreen 9 months ago
You could name this video:
"Why magic works."
Many magic tricks use this very concept to make things appear and disappear. Except they are a bit more deliberate about hiding the change by misdirection.
PuppyZwolle 10 months ago
Finally, that explains why I can't find the car keys or my wallet in the morning!!
something2sea 1 year ago
Well I'm sure these people are from a wide array of subjects tested... but yes, this is a valid phenomena... there's actually a Derren Brown flick where he is replaced by people that look absolutely nothing like him....
iig0tem 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REAL Free energy technology exists!But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be part of the revolution!
hungarylnnjsd 1 year ago
Stumbled from my psychology slides.
ImaginaryLettuce 1 year ago
How many men noticed it and how many women noticed it. I feel like there was something involving sexuality that was a definite variable in this experiment.
ThisGuysRetarded 1 year ago
@ThisGuysRetarded *nods* Woman tend to notice male change more and males seem to notice a woman changing more often. Like the doc said. If the focus is on the person they are more likely to spot the change.
PuppyZwolle 10 months ago
So that's how we got from Bush to Obama yet ended up with the same bullshit :-)
MrMikejallen 1 year ago
So that's how we got from Bush to Obama yet ended up with the same bullshit :-)
MrMikejallen 1 year ago 3
they are pretty good looking guys I wonder if females noticed more
uilium 1 year ago
Derren Brown also did a similar thing. 1 person went up to a random stranger and asked for them to point out a location on a map. Then they're interrupted by two people carrying a large painting, and the person with the map swaps with a painting carrier. At one point they switched a white man for a black man, and the person didn't notice. It's amazing how much our minds can ignore.
AoifeUnudottir 1 year ago
cool shiz!
mintmohijto 1 year ago
I find it brilliant. Was sent to the video from a lecture on perception.
Skat2090 1 year ago
Stumbled from Jax, Florida... I love experiments like these! Anyone on here know of some other cool psych videos I could watch??
Smoochie789 1 year ago
@Smoochie789
stumbleupon, choose psychology
EJET07 1 year ago
@Smoochie789
"Akinetopsia' I haven't searched but thats a pretty crazy thing. People can't construct motion so things jump around lol
craiggers3015 1 year ago
Just goes to show 75% of people don't pay attention
Lainmacha 1 year ago
Am i the only one who noticed the change in Daniel Simons' appearance? First a red shirt then a blue.
z4rizzle 1 year ago 5
@z4rizzle Wow, well seen!
Rackergen 1 year ago
@z4rizzle Haha I didn't notice that :D
alig117 1 year ago
Some people are just pure idiotic.
TheBookArchive 1 year ago
...so what?
I mean: what's the point man!?
Nonconceptualcontent 1 year ago 2
By the way, the sentence "Some people are just pure idiotic" IS a pure truism... it's like saying "some days are better than others" :-)
Nonconceptualcontent 1 year ago 39
@Nonconceptualcontent Not to the idiotic
TheBookArchive 1 year ago
@Nonconceptualcontent you mean they are tautologies
lpcrierie 2 months ago
@Nonconceptualcontent
"Purely" would be better though.
Awell.
Wolfzoon 2 months ago
@TheBookArchive these people are students at harvard.. so really.. they're the opposite of idiotic
joyofpepsi 11 months ago
@TheBookArchive according to this experiment, odds are you would do the same
santaneedshelp1942 11 months ago
@TheBookArchive Stop doing psychological experiments in stupid America and them globalize it like every human on Earth is an idiot like that. Harvard...don't be a genius where there is no problem, not let personal branding or politics stand in the way of a great school history.
ifdamian 7 months ago
@ifdamian change blindness is a robust effect! It was not 'globalized' by americans. It's human cognition, and the experiment has been run THOUSANDS of times in all different countries.
xmasterhand 7 months ago
@xmasterhand Then show me that! Show me the percentages in each country., Ok, i agree, the effect might have some scientific foundation, I'm not challenging that, i hate the generalization on psychological tests. Tell me the numbers in Russia, in Germany, in France, show me documentation, not just a 4 minute clip; this is neither educational, or truth, or funny or whatever. It's just a small PR scheme meant to have a Ooou effect on the common mind; It's commonly know as Bullsh*t.
ifdamian 7 months ago
i can link you to thousands of psychological studies conducted in different countries, i will inbox you if you really are this hard headed. Psychology does not generalize if the sample is not generalizable. It is a statistical science like any other science out there. If cognitive studies like this had never been conducted a wide variety of information about scene and object perception would never had been discovered. Perhaps before you make naive comments, try researching yourself.
xmasterhand 7 months ago
@ifdamian your probably not intelligent enough to make an educated opinion yourself, or have the cognitive ability to read one of those articles. never mind , believe what you want to believe. I dont believe they would publish this effect in hundreds of textbooks all over the world if it were simply an Oooou effect.
anyway good luck with your life... youre either a child or a very very stupid person :)
xmasterhand 7 months ago
@xmasterhand ...I'm not saying your stupid, but naive :) Psychology as a whole is not a fully fledged science; it has so many gaps and holes, especially in the research department, i really don't wanna get into it right now because it would take to much of my time right now and i don't consider your expertise as something to challenge, young padawan.
ifdamian 7 months ago
@xmasterhand If you made an assumption about me then let me make one about you: i believe you're a student that really doesn't know anything about the world, probably a masters in some wanna-be-future-cr*p-major science and guess what, good for you. You probably have it easy, surfing, living la vida loca, and that's all good, get your groove on but let the educated opinions to the educated ones and stay a mindless zombie, like a good boy.
ifdamian 7 months ago
@TheBookArchive You're wrong, it's not some, it's most, close to all.
torstenaan 6 months ago
@TheBookArchive No just you. This shows that most people don't see as much as they think. These experiments show that what a person may see is not what they actually saw. Like when people point out the wrong person to police. Now go back to bed your do in 5th grade tomorrow.
Kiljoy616 5 months ago
Stumbled upon from Seattle, WA. Very cool!!!
bonesspoilers 1 year ago
Stumbled from Oregon
bubbadaslug 1 year ago
Stumbled from Louisiana! This is awesome.
zhs2009 1 year ago
stumbled from Northville Michigan
queenie9305 1 year ago
Stumbled from San Diego
animejunki 1 year ago
Stumbled from boulder
Oneironaut72 1 year ago
Stumbled form Richmond, CA
rocklifter 1 year ago
stumbled from chicago
larimonds 1 year ago
Stumbled from Chattanooga Tennessee
PeachMolar 1 year ago
Sumbled form Montreal
cabs44 1 year ago
So what I want to know is how to overcome a more than moderate case of change blindness. It's a pain in the rear when you have to look and look for something that is in plain sight.
mojave19 1 year ago
Yeah....and......?
ancarte 1 year ago
stumbled from Gainesville FL.
nastytaco420 1 year ago
stumbled from Portugal
inesmartins9 1 year ago 3
Stumbled from your mother, now stop stumbling
michwng 1 year ago
Or they naturally pay attention to people more because they are naturally more socially adept. Specifically only 1 of the examples that didn't notice was a women, and all of the people who did were women.
Uniformconsistency 1 year ago
Stumbled from your moms bed
AandB901 1 year ago
Stumbled from Colorado.
bluedevils81082 1 year ago
stumbled from california
emilyiscoolerthanyou 1 year ago
Stumbled from Chicago.
RachelRADx69 1 year ago
stumbld from daytn ohio ha
spartaohio 1 year ago
Stumbled from The Bahamas.
foxhillgal1 1 year ago
stumbled from idaho xD
23maddiec 1 year ago
Stumbled from Boulder Polycom!
troybroomfieldCO 1 year ago
stumbled from illionis
Flipsk8X017 1 year ago
i didn't stumble i was linked from highDEAS haha
katiestrom 1 year ago
Stumbled Oklahoma. This is weird...
Allyepiph 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Stumbled Ashland Oregon.
seroyer2 1 year ago
Stumbled Dallas Texas. This blew my mind.
flyswatter2011 1 year ago
Corinth here. Crazy, Huh?
(Also, the snow's crazy too.)
Supperman42 1 year ago
stumbled from michigan
EJksg 1 year ago
fucking lamebrains
HIPxxTEFLON 1 year ago
stumbled from New Hampshire
IAmNotRickAstley 1 year ago
stumbled from virginia. is stumble upon the only way people even find this video?
zomgimonfire 1 year ago
stumbled from Ohio
singingsilently11 1 year ago
stumbled from your mother's anus
DEWS7EVEN 1 year ago 3
Stumbled from Dublin
Andinov02 1 year ago
Stumbled from Houston :D
Moriturum 1 year ago
stumbled from indonesiaaaaaa
rezaperdanaputra 1 year ago
stumbled from Stockholm
neoluffarn 1 year ago
stumbled from Iowa
bashfulkoala 1 year ago
this is stupid...the people are probably to nervous to say anything
109chickenwing 1 year ago
109chickenwing... did you even watch the video at all?
xxSUSHixx 1 year ago
stumbled from Costa RIca
smartinez316 1 year ago
Stumbled from Israel
joysnufkin 1 year ago
stumbled from new york
xkimstuh 1 year ago
Stumbled from Canada
katsyyy 1 year ago
idiots. didnt anyone realize the people who noticed the change were women and the ones who didnt were men.
1touch2many 1 year ago
stumbled from san diego.
Kingdom17 2 years ago 2
stumbled from victoria, Australia
ocrag 2 years ago
for all we know, this could be completely faked and feeding the rest of us false information, as a social experiment.
andrewwman18 2 years ago
Stumbled from Michigan.
mellowmarsh0220 2 years ago
this experiment is kind of pointless. why study people reactions to meaningless changes? i wouldnt notice completely because i dont give a fuck about who im interacting with, i just care about what im doing. If a doctor left while i was getting a physical and a new one stepped in 5sec later i wouldnt notice.
amarch20 2 years ago
@amarch20 Woah you sound educated, the point of this study was to prove the hypothesis, to prove SOMETHING. It doesn't have to change the world, just reveal evidence to support a claim. Simply because you don't get it right away doesn't mean its pointless.
bazookafox 2 years ago
@bazookafox Im just saying it seems obvious to me most people wouldn't notice because i for sure would not. And don't criticize my level of education; I'm in pharmacy school and your name is bazookafox. are you twelve? or just simple?
amarch20 2 years ago
It is not pointless. I stumbled onto this video from a lawyers blog and as you can see eye witness testimony is not always reliable
SJMar86 2 years ago
oh come on we all know what they say about lawyers......
jk. i guess you have a point. but the guy who ran this experiment even said the pattern could be based on coincidence. to really be valid the experiment would have to include more variables like race, gender, and eyesight to help reveal real patterns. i guess its a new theory i was a little quick to criticize.
amarch20 2 years ago
great video
stumbled from texas
xMessyy 2 years ago
Stumbled
harpy515 2 years ago
@harpy515 , Same.
funnyasdeath 2 years ago
Absolutely terrifying.
Shaidyn 2 years ago
Did anybody else notice that Prof. Simons is wearing a red shirt in the beginning and blue one at the end?
andrewsprout 2 years ago 24
...yes!!!
Cheers,
F
Nonconceptualcontent 2 years ago
Okay, nice one, didn't catch that AT ALL..
Sounds like an obvious little trick too..
CyaninCobaltAzure 2 years ago
Stumbled from Whistler, Canada
nellzy 2 years ago
Derren Brown did a version of this using people on the street looking at a map and looking for directions.
cornyack 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i would notice
altDIY 2 years ago
great video...
thegreatgarry 2 years ago
stumbled from Washington
DemonSamurai42 2 years ago
Comment on this video
m4lvolio 2 years ago
stumbled!!! chi
aldana3144 2 years ago
Stumbled from Louisiana
Som3tim3s1wond3rs 2 years ago
stumble from queens ny
birthdaygirlmichelle 2 years ago
nobody cares where you stumbled from
alapseinreason 2 years ago
stumbled from ga
superhetoric 2 years ago
i stumbled...then i brushed myself off and thought who gives a fuck. ground breaking...waste of camera and time. jesus hairy christ.....NEXT.
polpotsdog 2 years ago
Stumbled from Florida. Very interesting video!
UndyingLusts 2 years ago
@millball: Agreed. Stumbled from SC.
PrinceofGeorgia 2 years ago
Stumbled from NY and very glad I did! This was really interesting!
PhantomInTraining 2 years ago
Interesting observation lol. Stumbled from Canada
aby4111 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This experiment cost approx. £5000. Conclusion: some people pay more attention than others. Ground-breaking.
millball 2 years ago
I think they know. They just don't give a fuck.
kickasskicker50 2 years ago 3
@kickasskicker50 LMFAO.
millball 2 years ago
AHHAHAHA
iverson3324 2 years ago
hahaha amazing!
pini6087 2 years ago
Wow, that is amazing, the fact that those people walk around day to day, thinking they are totally aware seems to have been disproved. XD I love science.
johnnyquest1354 2 years ago 2
wow this is trippin me out, im gonna try to notice EVERYTHING from now on lol
crankdatbatman23 2 years ago 3
that's amazing.
Dragonfly7416 2 years ago
TruBlueRepublicanSue ,
People that notice something like this will go further in life by having some sort of awareness attribute and anyone who would call anybody a "retard" displays who they truly are. leave the part if you really are a Pub. You're a disgrace.
Tasteslikechikin 2 years ago
pinochet222,
If you took time to notice, which you didn't and that makes you as dumb as the people in this video, you would realize (just take a look at your post) that no one has a clue who you are replying to when you use reply. So, that's why I use your name and don't use the reply button.
Your fries are now burned so you'll have to look for another job, please try to pay attention, and my balls are fine. You may now gargle them.
Tasteslikechikin 2 years ago
wow...
you're actually a huge faggot.
iverson3324 2 years ago
@iverson3324
Wow, what an intelligent and well thought out response. You Einsteins are a blessing to youtube. Keep up the great contributions.
Tasteslikechikin 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its youtube, not a science class.
go eat a dick
iverson3324 2 years ago
Comment removed
iverson3324 2 years ago
Comment removed
Tasteslikechikin 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@iverson3324
And it wasn't used as one. I suggest grammar classes and you sticking to skateboard nut-crack videos. Anything more than that could obviously make your head hurt.
And it certainly is science......
Thanks for proving my point, clown.
Tasteslikechikin 2 years ago
@iverson3324 you mean a noun :)
DarkShroom 2 years ago 2
just stop talking.
midgetized 2 years ago
Wow... thanks for the idea.
I'll try swapping partners and see if they noticed :D
wilsontt88 2 years ago 2
my theory is that only a retard would not notice this
TruBlueRepublicanSue 2 years ago
stumbled from Devon, UK :)
imightbeizzy 2 years ago 2
stumbled from delaware
reibakarei 2 years ago
Stumbled from Miami
SrAlvaruchi 2 years ago
i love the way he slashed the theory at the end
karmaslogan 2 years ago 3
Shows how much people pay attention!
Very cool!
Stumbled from London!!!
babynad96 2 years ago
Nice. Stumbled from Nashville
sumthingdrumsumthing 2 years ago