brother i agree with you.. . now what exactly is the problem. the problem is the breast is exposed, no imagery of mother is conveyed. if the image would have been of mother nourishing her daughter it would have been ideal. anyways u are free to have your artistic vision... i have my own opinions. may good sense prevail on you
@sandeephalder once again . there need not be a suckling infant present in the pictures to signify motherhood . just as , there need not be a caressing male hand to denote erotica !!
devi is nava-yauvana-sampanna and mother at the same time . and never has she been shown with breasts covered , except in recent times .
@sandeephalder have you ever , by any remote possibility ,chanced to see some ancient hindu art ? like those in konark , puri , chola art , pala and sena era bengali deities etc ?
or better still do you know what is kalighat patachitra of our very own bengal ?
google them out and see the beautiful breasts . do you know how devi is described in mantras ? one having round full breasts as high as pitchers !
@sandeephalder we have suckled on our mothers breasts right after birth . its a pity that we forget that nourishing identity of a female breast and treat them merely as a pornographic erotica . all due to some silly persons like you .
there isnt any wrong in the depictions . but there IS some serious faults in the way you perceive them , my friend . god bless your imaginations .
Gd Video and a very devotional song.. keep uploading.. and I wont comment about art as I dont understand it well..bt what I know is Maa Kali.. is also the Goddess of death and during death we wont remember neither the art nor any physical specifications of the art except the love of mother before we go for our eternal sleep in her arms.. God bless u..
@arjunkanagal@arjunkanagal yes . probably . ignorant that he is of the importance of mothers breast under influence of victorian morals . it would be better if he looks up to the ancient indian depictions of devi parvati and yakshinis and see how the breasts are left bare for all to see .
the paintings here are modelled on a genre of art known as kalighat paintings , which also exposed breasts at times .
@sandeephalder grow up and cleanse ur outlook. ....good work and well explained Halley, some people can never see things correctly.
write2ranjanb 5 months ago
@write2ranjanb very true :-/
halleygoswami 5 months ago
brother i agree with you.. . now what exactly is the problem. the problem is the breast is exposed, no imagery of mother is conveyed. if the image would have been of mother nourishing her daughter it would have been ideal. anyways u are free to have your artistic vision... i have my own opinions. may good sense prevail on you
sandeephalder 1 year ago
@sandeephalder once again . there need not be a suckling infant present in the pictures to signify motherhood . just as , there need not be a caressing male hand to denote erotica !!
devi is nava-yauvana-sampanna and mother at the same time . and never has she been shown with breasts covered , except in recent times .
halleygoswami 1 year ago
in 1:15 timeline of the video the image in the center has its breast exposed. Now what kind of eccentricity is that in the name of Art.
sandeephalder 1 year ago
@sandeephalder have you ever , by any remote possibility ,chanced to see some ancient hindu art ? like those in konark , puri , chola art , pala and sena era bengali deities etc ?
or better still do you know what is kalighat patachitra of our very own bengal ?
google them out and see the beautiful breasts . do you know how devi is described in mantras ? one having round full breasts as high as pitchers !
halleygoswami 1 year ago
@sandeephalder we have suckled on our mothers breasts right after birth . its a pity that we forget that nourishing identity of a female breast and treat them merely as a pornographic erotica . all due to some silly persons like you .
there isnt any wrong in the depictions . but there IS some serious faults in the way you perceive them , my friend . god bless your imaginations .
halleygoswami 1 year ago
Good Song.....
indranilb2008 1 year ago
Good Song
indranilb2008 1 year ago
Gd Video and a very devotional song.. keep uploading.. and I wont comment about art as I dont understand it well..bt what I know is Maa Kali.. is also the Goddess of death and during death we wont remember neither the art nor any physical specifications of the art except the love of mother before we go for our eternal sleep in her arms.. God bless u..
dj198703 1 year ago
@dj198703 well said dj . thanks for watching and for the support . i can never imagine to disrespect the deity whom i call mother .
you might want to check out my latest videos on agamani songs . it is named ' PUNAR-AGAMANAYA-CHA ' .
god bless . jai ma
halleygoswami 1 year ago
Who else did u think it was ?? :)
arjunkanagal 1 year ago
Yes bro... Thats true... Almost all Dravidian arts did show female breasts regardless of the deity long ago...
arjunkanagal 1 year ago
@arjunkanagal hehe . its you . haha . welcome . :)
halleygoswami 1 year ago
He is probably refering to the paintings which expose mothers bare chest.
arjunkanagal 1 year ago
@arjunkanagal @arjunkanagal yes . probably . ignorant that he is of the importance of mothers breast under influence of victorian morals . it would be better if he looks up to the ancient indian depictions of devi parvati and yakshinis and see how the breasts are left bare for all to see .
the paintings here are modelled on a genre of art known as kalighat paintings , which also exposed breasts at times .
halleygoswami 1 year ago
it's blasphemous... DO U IMAGINE UR OWN MOTHER IN SUCH IMAGE....
sandeephalder 1 year ago
@sandeephalder can you be a bit more clear . what , in your opinion is balsphemous ?
pardon me but i could not make out anything of ur comment .
halleygoswami 1 year ago
Nice song
sasdasbd 2 years ago
thanks for appreciating .
jai maa.........
halleygoswami 2 years ago
excellent bhajan ki sunder
jai ma durga
chaula1 2 years ago