WTC2-Strike-7

[ctrackmonger]

Look at 0:05 it is the shape of a Boeing 747 at the cockpit, could that be why the left and right wing disappeared, because a 747 has 4 engines???

[sir4ki]

cockpits dont carry fuel - so they cant explode ... especialy after impact .... carbon cant penetrate........ i bet my house it wasnt an commercial airliner

[sir4ki]

cockpits dont carry fuel - so they cant explode ... especialy after impact .... carbon cant penetrate........ i bet my house it wasnt an commercial airliner

[mantooth3245]

Because it is said that these are not commercial airliners,does anyone think that the 157 passengers combined on both planes that hit the towers were on board ? or taken away and killed somewhere else? Or were made up passengers ?

[travelsonic]

@mantooth3245 Not to mention that the aircraft's capacity doesn't always translate to how many are *actually* on board a particular flight.

[mantooth3245]

@travelsonic the bigger the aircraft ,the easier they can make up a number of how many people died! very true, well said!

[boolaffah]

الله أكبر

[Danklin24]

Dummy aircraft? if they used dummy aircraft where the fuck are all those people that were aboard those plans? im sure theyre sons and daughters, wives, husbands and parents would love to know.

[SelectedHandfull]

if it WAS a cover up, why not just blow up the buildings instead of going threw allllll the trouble of highjackng planes?

[venuecam]

@Selected would you have believed an attack on the middle east be necessary unless you were going to be convinced by the media that it was a suicide bomber?

The price of oil sky rocketed as soon as this happened. Aint no coincidence.

[VinceFoster1]

@SelectedHandfull because then they can terrorize you at the airports and the can get greater control of your mobility

[Xendrius]

@SelectedHandfull Yea just blowing up the towers would not yell inside job? Ofcourse it would, Think, use your brain.

[aifammafiaaifam]

dont think who or why just look at the way it is now ,is the world a better place i dont think so

[sbandat90]

11/09 wasn't a inside job

[thoughtplacebo]

If it wasn't an inside job it was a sideways job. Who had what to gain? Larry Silverstein.

[venuecam]

And the rest of the elite...

Think who really owns and runs America... sorry the UNITED STATES. Corporations, banks, royal family. The more questions we ask the deeper the hole gets. It's no wonder about all their talk of shutting own the internet. We're learning.

[VinceFoster1]

@venuecam it was zionist israelis. Rothchilds personal terror state

[yassin166]

I thought that the second plane doesnt had engines.

[dobberdoss]

Why does'nt anyone just go back over the flight schedules for these planes (and their numbers)and then the security footage at their intended destinations? If the military did a double up with dummy aircraft then the real planes will be shown to land regardless

[PlayerHater117]

I'm not a conspiracy theorist but if you think about it, don't you think will all the bright minds, control, and overall power the U.S. government holds, that maybe they'd figure a way around that?

[dobberdoss]

I don't know about that, were they so bright is attacking a 2 countries that had nothing to do with this event? Half the alleged nineteen 911 terrorists initially named weren't even in the US! Some were totally innocent of any connections and a free today living their lives. Not too "bright" id say.  Still alot of loose ends unanswered

[lolfactor007]

It ain't a fucking cover up

Jezus things like that can't be hold secret!!!

That kind of arrogance lead to this!

[GGcaptmandrake]

I'll have to continue this discussion tomorrow, as I have to log off in 10 minutes!

[GGcaptmandrake]

Guess he trotted off!...Oh well...

[GGcaptmandrake]

Who said anything about the jet fuel fire melting the steel?...LOL!!!

[GGcaptmandrake]

In the case of bldg. 7 all it takes, is for one beam to be knocked out of place, and then there is a sufficient failure to collapse the whole building! really, the same goes for the twin towers, or any building! LOL!!!

[UntamedWalrus]

LOL!!! Do you really have to do that?

Ever see that building that was on fire for something like 24 hours? The steel remained standing for a reason. Fire doesn't melt steel. Here is another question for you. Why was there molten steel found under WTC7? You can't dismiss that.

[GGcaptmandrake]

What molten STEEL?...LOL!!! They never said it was steel that was molten! LOL!!! There was plenty of molten aluminum though!

[GGcaptmandrake]

And: You have yet to answer my inquiri about why they sprayed on fire proofing in the twin towers, or bother to fire proof any steel framed building, if fire can't melt; or otherwise compromise steel! LOL!!!

[UntamedWalrus]

Of course fire melts steel, but what I meant was an ordinary fire. Molten steel was found under WTC7

[GGcaptmandrake]

"Of course fire melts steel"

"What I meant was 'ordinary' fire"

"Molten steel was found under wtc7"

No need to say anything, you just debunked yourself! And, made two contradictory claims! LOL!!! They have never confirmed that the molten metal found under the world trade center, was actually steel, and not aliminum!

Also: please differentiate between "Ordinary" fire, and other than "ordinary" fire. Let's have a definition please! LOL!!!!

[Sharky2055]

Carry on, Capt.

[UntamedWalrus]

LOL!!!! I'm correcting the incorrect statement I worded incorrectly. LOL!!!!

I just said fire because most people attribute fire from jet fuel as the cause of the collapse. By ordinary fire I mean fires that aren't supplied with a fuel. LOL!!!

Also yes they have proved it was steel, they have tests for that these days. LOL!!!!

Not to mention the supporting beams have parts that have melted in pictures. LOL!!! Usually they don't make support beams out of aluminum. LOL!!!

[GGcaptmandrake]

They have not confirmed that the metal found to be molten was steel! The notion, that the steel frame can't collapse from fire alone, is retarded! There have been all kinds of buildings that have collapsed from fire alone! There is no such thing as a fire that is not supplied with a fuel! 25% of the support columns were removed out of their place at impact! there is no way when combined with fire that a building in this condition is not going to collpase!

[GGcaptmandrake]

15% of the support columns were removed at the impact, not 25%! typo! LOL!!!

[GGcaptmandrake]

Anyone familiar with fundamental particle physics, can concur with this basic truth!

Heat applied to a substance, causes the molecules within the substance, to move rapidly, thus de-stabilizing the substance!

[Sharky2055]

UntamedWalrus

Ordinary fires don't burn for several hours generally,

[UntamedWalrus]

Yeah they do. Seen it plenty of times. Besides that just look at the skyscaper fire in Madrid that burned for something like 24 hours (correct me if I'm wrong) and all steel remained undamaged.

[Sharky2055]

That's incorrect, the steel was damaged and it DID collapse several stories in the fire zone. It just didn't collapse all the way down. Several FDNY chiefs were very concerned it would collapse many hours before it happened. I'll take their experience and expertise over 'truthers' any day, thanks.

[Sharky2055]

"Early on, there was concern that 7 World Trade Center might have been both impacted by the collapsing tower and had several fires in it and there was a concern that it might collapse. So we instructed that a collapse area -- (Q. A collapse zone?) -- Yeah -- be set up and maintained so that when the expected collapse of 7 happened, we wouldn't have people working in it...

nytimes. com/packages/html/nyregion/200­50812_WTC_GRAPHIC

/Cruthers. txt

[Sharky2055]

We headed toward 7. And just around we were about a hundred yards away and Butch Brandies came running up. He said forget it, nobodys going into 7, theres creaking, there are noises coming out of there, so we just stopped. And probably about 10 minutes after that, Visconti, he was on West Street, and I guess he had another report of further damage either in some basements and things like that, so Visconti said nobody goes into 7, so that was the final thing & that was abandoned. -Chief Boyle

[Sharky2055]

Hayden: Yeah, we had to pull everybody back. It was very difficult. We had to be very forceful in getting the guys out. They didnt want to come out. There were guys going into areas that I wasnt even really comfortable with, because of the possibility of secondary collapses. We didnt know how stable any of this area was. We pulled everybody back probably by 3 or 3:30 in the afternoon. We said, this building is going to come down, get back. It came down about 5 oclock or so.. - Chief Cruthers

[Sharky2055]

*correction that was Chief Hayden:

ht tp : // w w w. firehouse. com/terrorist/911/mag.../gz/ha­yden. ht ml

firehouse. com/terrorist/911/mag...e/gz/b­oyle. ht ml

Excerpt from statement from Chief of Ops Nigro:

Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit.

Regards, Dan Nigro

Chief of Department FDNY (retired)

h ttp : // 911guide. googlepages. com/danielnigro

[UntamedWalrus]

Yeah I remember that. The guy who owned the WTC's told them to pull out and that it wasn't worth it. It just doesn't make sense that it would come down the way it did.

I'm just glad you argue without going "LOL!!!" like that other guy. I'm not a truther, nor do i accept the governments story. Both sides have good arguments but there are alot of suspicious and unexplained things regarding 9/11. That's all I'm saying.

[Sharky2055]

No, he did not. Silverstein doesn't have the power to tell the FDNY what to do. The man that had that power was Chief Daniel Nigro. I suggest before you embarrass yourself you read this link before going on:

Excerpt from statement from Chief of Ops Nigro:

Conspiracy theories abound and I believe firmly that all of them are without merit.

Regards, Dan Nigro

Chief of Department FDNY (retired)

h ttp : // 911guide. googlepages. com/danielnigro

[UntamedWalrus]

There is video recording of him saying that. For one thing he could have said to pull out that it wasn't worth it, people do that with their houses. Being in the fire department, I know that the chief would call the shots. I'm not embarassed at all, and once again I said I'm not a truther but there are suspicious things around the 9/11 event and we aren't getting anywhere with this conversation. People are dead and that can't be changed but IF it was a conspiracy may justice somehow come about.

[Sharky2055]

Yet, it doesn't matter what the owner said because when it comes down to it the Chief of Ops, of the FDNY then is the one that gave the order and says why. So far you've not shown any cause for alarm, nothing suspicious at all. You've demonstrated not much of what you were basing that on is false/incorrect.

[UntamedWalrus]

I just lost interest in this argument. People never change what they believe no matter what, so there is no point. The buildings are gone and people are dead. Hey what do you think about the pentagon though? Don't be an asshole like capt, I enjoy a good debate, not a LOL!!!ing contest.

[GGcaptmandrake]

What about the Pentagon?...

[GGcaptmandrake]

I was just curious as to what he wants to discuss about the Pentagon...

[Sharky2055]

UntamedWalrus I do remember you opening up with calling me a "cunt". You just lost interest because you've embarassed yourself. It's not our fault you believe in false information, now is it? You've been given sources, so there's no question my informaiton is correct and factual. You moved the goalposts a few times when we started, & I let it go. Now you're getting snitty about this. After hurling the word, "cunt", you've got nothing to complain about.

[UntamedWalrus]

No I never use that word, I think you are mistaken haha. You see I could say the same to you that you believe in false information and we can keep thinking we are right but its not going to change anything. I'm not embarassed, I still believe what I believe and so do you, its just getting annoying going back and forth. The only sources I've been given are from FD chiefs. About the pentagon: How did it make such a small hole? We can start with that.

[Sharky2055]

I stand corrected, I was writing on 4 different threads yesterday. I believe Al Qaeda did 9/11 and it's been proven. There were witnesses to the plane going into the Pentagon. There were fire dpertments there too. Are the words of the fire departments not good enough for you, along with the wreckage, testimonies form the Air Traffic controllers, flight attendants and the passengers?

[UntamedWalrus]

See I'm not the only one who miswords things :P

I don't know how I feel on 9/11. Off topic, but do you believe NWO is possible?

[Sharky2055]

NO, it wasn't misworded. It was being called a "cunt" and "whore" among other things too many times. Today I even got a deaththreat with someone telling me exactly all the ways they wanted to kill me. Think I just might turn over all my threats to the local police now, as I'm really tired of that kind of BS 'truthers'.

The NWO is a term, not an entity. No, it's not possible, unless you want to blieve the old James Bond movies are real.

[UntamedWalrus]

You still we're wrong nanananabooboo

:-P

Joking aside, I look up this stuff for interest and I really don't think it's such a big deal that people need to use death threats haha.

As for NWO I don't mean some of the rediculous things they say in movies, but more like violating constitutional rights like the right to bear arms. It already happened in New Orleans. What a great idea to take away guns in one of the rare times you just might need it for someone breaking in.

[Sharky2055]

UntamedWalrus

Yet, they hurl those threats anyways, unsolicted. What rights to bare arms have been taken? As for weapons I don't think people should be allowed to run around with Ak47s or armor pierciing ammo. But I[m not letting anyone take away my right to a firearm, which I've decided to get some more practice with. Just never know about people these days. I don't recall them being taken away in New Orleans. That's beside the point.

[UntamedWalrus]

They haven't yet but there is much talk of it. You should be allowed to have AK-47's and AR15's in my opinion as long as they aren't automatic, which would just mean massacre at public places. As for armor piercing ammo I don't care because I'd go for headshots. In New Orleans during the hurrican Katrina thing the mayor (or some official...I think it was the mayor) declared that nobody woulf be allowed to have guns. The military actually went into peoples homes without asking.

[Sharky2055]

They've been talking about since day 1. They'll continue to. It doesn't mean it'll happen. 2)Katrina was an extremely screwed up event & was unique. 1/3 of their police force LEFT. There was hardly enough to protect anyone, so it was a temporary thing. Not correct, but it was done by a local authority not Fed. The military went in looking for people that needed help. Were they supposed to stand back and wait for people to come to them, if they could? Enough of that had already happened.

[UntamedWalrus]

That's the thing that makes no sense though. A gun is to protect your house and in the rare time somone might be looting and robbing your house THEY TAKE THE GUNS AWAY! No I mean how they went into peoples houses to take guns.

[Sharky2055]

Did I not say it was a screwed event? Yes, it was, in many ways. Did it make sense to leave the school buses where they were when they could've gotten thousands of people out with them? NO, but they were. Did it make sense for the mayor to be eating a lesiure meal at a local eatery at 6pm the evening before Katrina hit? NO, but it happened. Just because it doesn't make sense to you, doesn't mean it didn't happen. The govt on FEd and state levels tend to bungle all they come into contact with.

[UntamedWalrus]

No I know it happened. I was just saying how they took guns away is scary because that could easily happen again, and personally I'd want to have a gun in that situation.

[TheMasterOfTwoof]

I think AA flt 77 crashed into the pentagon after being hijacked by terrorists. why, what do you think happened?

mandrake is not the asshole on this vid fuckchop LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!

[Sharky2055]

UntamedWalrus

See hwat happens when you call a nice woman a "cunt" & then complain when someone "lol"s. Can't tell you how many times 'truthers' have lol'd when I've tried to have sensible discussions with them. These gentleman don't appreciate that it seems.

[Sharky2055]

There was no inside job. There's not a shred of evidence to support the claims saying there is.

[UntamedWalrus]

There is plenty of evidence. I suggest you watch Zero: 911 (I think thats what it is called).

[Sharky2055]

UntamedWalrus

That's not evidence. Those 'truthers' videos are heavy on the ficton and low on the facts. Hint, there's no evidence.

[UntamedWalrus]

All of the things in that video are fact. I never said its a fact that it was an inside job, but things such as "steel doesn't melt at that low of a temperature" is a fact.

There is also no eveidence to prove that terrorists attacked the planes.

[Sharky2055]

UntamedWalrus

It's very misleading, and misrepsents what happened, which means it's fiction.

No evidence? Why would the flight attendants lie about being hijacked? Why would the passengers lie about being hijacked? the voices there weren't the pilots the Air Traffic control people heard, did passengers decide to try to fly those planes? the hijackers seen in the security cam footage, were they ghosts then? Thanks for proving you've got NO idea what 9/11 is about or what happened that day.

[UntamedWalrus]

You are misunderstanding what I'm saying. There in no evidence that terrorist groups headed by Osama Bin Laden hijacked planes. That security cam footage was from the flight of Portland to Boston by the way, but that's another story.

Remember I never said terrorists didn't cause this. I said it seems suspicious and even "inside job" doesn't mean the government did it. I have no proof, nor does anybody, of who did the 9/11 attacks BUT there are suspicious things about it.

[Sharky2055]

UntamedWalrus

Answer the questions.

[UntamedWalrus]

Okay. Never said they lied. Never said they lied. Those voices were probably the hijackers. Those security cam picture were actually of the supposed hijacker going from Portland to Boston. There you go.

[Sharky2055]

BY saying there's NO evidence, which is what your 1st statement was, you're saying THEY ARE LYING. There YOU go.

[UntamedWalrus]

No. That does't make sense. I said "There is no evidence that terrorist groups headed by Osama Bin Laden hijacked planes." I never said that they weren't hijacked and flown into the buildings. Also, why do you feel the need to DO this all of the TIME with caps?

[Sharky2055]

UntamedWalrus

THIS is what YOU wrote, which is evidenced in an earlier post,

"There is also no eviedence to prove that terrorists attacked the plane." - UntamedWalrus

"That terrorists atttacked the plane", Ring a bell now! Those flight attendants, passengers gave us evidence. The air traffic controllers gave us evidence.

[Sharky2055]

UntamedWalrus

There's NOTHING about Osama bin Laden in your original (earlier) post, in THAT sentence.

[UntamedWalrus]

Ah, I was wording that wrong. Obviously a terrorist could be anybody who causes terror. What I meant was that there is no evidence that the Taliban did this attack.

[Sharky2055]

UntamedWalrus

NO you did not. Now you're trying to weasel your way out of it, because you've got hard evidence staring you in the face, and heart. Step up and admit you're wrong. There's no harm in doing so. I'm NOT going to point a finger and laugh at you. I'm not here for games. I'm here to proffer the truth and make sure those flight attendants and passengers testimonies aren't callousedly and needlessly dismissed, for that dismissing their very lives. That's heinous.

[UntamedWalrus]

I have no hard evidence for either of these sides. I am not saying planes were not hijacked. What I meant to say is that there is little evidence as to WHO really did it. Even the FBI admits they don't really have much evidence supporting that HE was behind it. The main thing here is that there are suspicious details about 9/11 that have never been answered and there never was a full investigation. That is just wrong.

[Sharky2055]

Wrong AGAIN! The FBI KNOWS who did it. It's been proven in a court os US law and a guilty verdict rendered beyond a reasonable doubt for one of the accomplices& he was sentenced in 2006. And another was just recently convicted. You squirmed mentioning Osama Bin LAden and then the Taliban, but said you've misspoken yourself. OK, fine, the questions have been answered. There were full investigations. Your not liking the results doesn't preclude that.

[UntamedWalrus]

There is no evidence supporting the fact that Osama Bin Laden was behind this. One of the videos where he "claims responsibility" was misleading. He never said he did it, he said he was glad it happened (to sum it up).

LOOK I know we don't agree on the same thing, but don't you tihnk some thigns are suspicious? Don't you find it weird that 3 buildings (all owned by the same guy by the way) just happened to collapse into themselves perfectly at freefall speed?

[Sharky2055]

Answer this, is OBL the whole of AlQaeda?Is he all the members of AlQaeda?No.When there are accomplices to a murder do police seek to arrest only 1 person? There is evidence that he supported it, recruited ppl for it approved it to begin with. NO, I don't find them suspicious because I'm aware of the facts. What fell at freefall speed that day were the people that jumped to their deaths, not the towers, PerfectlY?They created 16 acres of destruction taking out 5 & eventually 7, part of 5.

[UntamedWalrus]

The towers did fall at near free fall speed, math doesn't lie. They did fall perfectly. The large destruction mostly came from the debris cloud and such, which is why they don't allow people near a controlled demolition. It's funny you bring up WTC 7. Everyone knows regular fires won't touch steel. Alot of people know jet fuel won't melt steel, but people tend to disagree. They also say that jetfuel and impact is what caused the collapse. So...what caused WTC 7? A regular fire? Bullshit.

[GGcaptmandrake]

The North tower, fell at a collapse rate of 22.02 seconds! The south tower fell at a collapse rate of 15.25 seconds. building 7 was struck by falling debris, from the twin towers' collapse! They estimate, that there was a gash reaching inward by impacting debris, at a total of 25% of the depth building! LOL!!! If fire can't collapse a building, then why do they have fire protection around the steel? The bldgs. didn't fall anywhere fast enough to even come close to freefall!

[k1llum1nat]

911=inside job ........wtf.......

[wad2477]

911 us emergency number and this happened on 9/11. one word CONSPIRACY911

[FritzEur0]

hahahahahahahahaha. 9/11 was funny. i dont care who did it, as long as it caused a great funny plane crash i dont give a fuck. i actually respect whoever did it. this gives me so much viewing pleasure. fascinating. people should do more plane crashes soon!

[buttsqocker]

mother fucker that aint funny u gay cunt i hope every one that reads this comment kills u becuz one of us will fuck of youtube go fuck ur self get a fuckin life and dont harm the harmed the terrerist are as worse as u are mate i hope u fuckin die slowly and painfully with all ur family ur mum ur dad or ur sisters or brothers i dont fucking care i hope they fuckign rot

[rondlite]

@buttsqocker when you came to the USA they should have thought you some english and manners.

[joebob900]

i hope your mom dies a suffering death. and I hope God doesnt have any mercy on your soul. die you jerk. fall down and die.

[tarmuetnh]

Terrorists are a MYTH used to hide the truth. Bin Laden / Al Qaeda have admitted to numerous acts of terrorism but there is NO solid evidence to support these claims.

Now ask yourself these basic questions -

What is the easiest country to bomb in the world?

Who are the easiest people to manipulate and terrorise in the world?

What is the easiest embassy to bomb in the world?

Answer = YOUR OWN

If you have not already then I suggest you WAKE UP and see what is right in front of you.

[Manelvagorio]

What is the easiest country to BLAME in the world?

A.N.S.W.E.R. = YOUR OWN

9/11 Truthers, STAY ASLEEP and keep dreaming about what is right in front of you.

[tarmuetnh]

Yes, thank you for adding to what is essentially pure logic.

You believe in hollywood hijack stories, impossible collapses and evil genius arab terrorists. You have watched far to many hollywood films that you will believe just about anything. GROW UP.

[Manelvagorio]

Pure logic? Well its pure something anyway - PURE IDIOCY

¿YOU believe in - ¿thermite explosives secretly planted on 220 floors under the nose of 30,000 WTC employees - ¿remotely-controlled or laser-guided or cruise-missle-replaced airliners where the real passengers were what, spirited away to guantanamo? - ¿evil genius NEOCONS who perpetrated the MOST INTRICATLY COMPLEX HOAX IN HISTORY but couldn't even fight a conventional war in a 3rd world country?

You are living in a fantasy world

[tarmuetnh]

For some reason you think my rejection of the official explanation means i have an alternative. I do NOT need one or want one. You don't exclude a suspect then solve the crime. You exclude and you start again.

Arab terrorists (expert airliner pilots) board different planes at different times. They then hijack, take over and re-route them into bulls-eye targets within 17 minutes of each other. With only Bin Ladens word it was Al Qaeda.

You believe in 100% BULLSHIT (thats just the hijack, lol)

[Manelvagorio]

@tarm - "For some reason you think my rejection of the official explanation means i have an alternative. I do NOT need one or want one."

Funny that you say this AFTER you already offered one.

@tarm - "What is the easiest country to bomb in the world?

Who are the easiest people to manipulate and terrorise in the world?

What is the easiest embassy to bomb in the world?

Answer = YOUR OWN"

[tarmuetnh]

That is NOT offering an explanation. That is an example of pure logic and absolute fact. To say that is isn't logic or fact is to deny yourself the ability to think clearly.

[buttsqocker]

easiest country proboly asia or africa the easiest people to minipulate is someone that i dont no yet 3 stop posting shitty fucking comments like all the ones on this page

[tarmuetnh]

No - The easiest country to bomb is your own - FACT, to think otherwise you are deluding yourself.

I post nothing but information that is the TRUTH, therefore I am telling it like it is.

[joebob900]

have you ever noticed that America hasn't a war enter there country since the Revolutionary War. America has the strongest forces in all the world. May not be as big as China, but is 5x's better. But with the clown we have in office now, anything could happen. so really ever since up to January 20, 2009, it would probably be the hardest country to bomb. FACT.

[richmondpalmbay62]

no one does anything about anything at all these agencies are worthless to anyone for normal stuff

[richmondpalmbay62]

Serial killers do this forever stay on one name like kim or kimberly until all dead towers been through a lot being tossed off the top of the building after being robbed not believe what happened in new york and in florida find the last kimberly born 2 days old then go onto another name of another child dahmer stuff too until it was gone

[7dawgs0809]

God Bless all those passengers in Flight 11 and Flight 175 :( I can't imagine what its like to be either on those planes...

[DaGhostAngel]

Terrible!

[mattypooz]

Americans need to stop bickering amonst themselves and fucking storm Washington, kick all the lying bastards out of the Shite House and start all over again.

[jasoncollinslover35]

well, all those cycho paths that think planes never hit the building can just look at this

[hossua34]

What, that doesn't look like a cruise missle to you?... (Note: sarcasm)

[shatwood]

thank you

[archangel385]

I still cant fucking believe that something like that really happened!

[phalsephlagphloozie]

Two revealing videos.

Youtube titles:

Laser Targeting UAV, Evidence of Military Technology on 9/11 (original)

New 9/11 PROOF of WTC Controlled Demolition - AngelsForTruth

[Weirdo10o4]

YAWN, that laser targeting was lame. Now tell me why not remote control?

[MNSLproductions]

Stop putting such long comments on youtube. No one cares.

[m10kpo]

fakin bin laden

[sepiasilence]

same bin laden who threatend to do just this, and released videos taking credit for it? idiot

[vvrvladd]

people always mistaken fake footage with 3d generated images ,this plane was 3d generated

[Atheistjeremy]

You're a moron. Seriously, you should be charged for the air you breathe.

[hi518]

you fucking fagg 9/11 was an attack to try to cripple our econmy they epicly failed so shut your mouth and jump in a river u douchebag'

[moogle140]

danm. fully scarey from the angle its looks fake WHICH ITS NOT

i wish it was fake because i did't want people to die

[MegadethDave666]

where is that at Angle??

[Tube4Christ]

Bernd over and take what...? WHAT has your complainning done to change what happened? Ok lets say the government planned it all out and was in on it and yadda yadda. Do you feel...better about yourself or "stronger" because you disagree with it? Well so what, they're still the government you havn't done anything to change it. Just review the security tapes, you can see the plain leave logan and take off for it's flight, my aunt had two friends on that plane, it's real. Why does it anger you so?

[Onishax]

yes, Tube4Christ is right all you infidels can stop whining now just bend over and take it like real people

[Tube4Christ]

haha... you people waste so much time whinning about it for what? Is whinning going to reverse the attacks or build new towers? What concern is it of yours that we were attacked on 9/11? Cave dwellers? come on they're alot smarter then that stop sterotyping people. We were caught off guard plain and simple. My aunt Kathy had two good friends on that second plane and the pilot was from my home town...THATS how I know AND I lived near Boston at the time and saw the security tapes.

[jdprice455]

Then explain how experts on the planes that hit the towers say that there is no way they could have hit those buildings going 530 miles per hour that speed is only acheived in cruising altitude which is 35,000 ft to even try to go that fast that low wouldnt be possible. And I also remember on NBCs live coverage that they never noticed 175 coming in it just blew up no mention of a plane hell i didnt even see the plane on live tv it just blew up.

[japantoine]

i dont think a remote control for an airplane like that exist. lets say if its a normal remote control for that plane...what happens if its out of battery what could happen? a BOOOM ya

[electric789]

you are misinformed. they have full remote control apparatus for large planes. they run on Jet fuel; not batteries.

[rareu4532]

I Dont understand how ppl just want to blind!! It was passanger Air plane who hit the towers and you see that here!!!...

[electric789]

rareu, are not aware yet that there was a time delay on the feed wherein CGI graphics were fed into the MSM streams? google "911 the incredible moving bridge"

[maxshooter]

hahaha johhny americans.

[jamesbond504]

i remember seeing the second plane hit n was like that bitch did more damage than the other plane

[Tube4Christ]

Remote controls... haha you goof balls love to conspiracies on everything don't you...

Look at the airport security tapes of the terrorists boarding the planes that caused the attacks. Or the hotel logs from Maine where they stayed a few days before.

If only we fought the war as effectively as the terrorists pulled off the attacks...

[electric789]

tube4, how do you explain a bunch of cave dwellers outsmarting the combined intellegence and air might of the USA? its because they had help for Cheney and friends. Cheney was in COMMAND of the air force that day and gave the order to stand down from scrambling interceptors. google it.

[baxternos]

Fuckin towel heads

[Nailersy]

I never saw this video before, you can see the way the terrorists bank the plane to left before impact. Horrific.

[electric789]

you mean the way the remote-control banked it. The pilots were proven poor fliers and this is a difficult turn. Besides, it was proven than almost all teh so-called hijackers are still alive and well.

[irishsid13]

you are a fucking idiot..a remote controlled plane?..no terrorists?..suicide,look into it.

[electric789]

Dont fall for the official version. Its a lie to perpetuate the New World Order agenda. Do they have to come to your door and force a microchip into your arm before you see the truth of this?

[electric789]

google "911 inside job". follow all 92 million links, get informed, then come back here and thank me for pointing you in the direction of the truth. They dont give a fuck about you - you are just raw meat to them. Stand up for yourself and the truth. Get educated. Love must prevail. Never surrender.

[DarthAtheos666]

hey electric. On behalf of humanity, go fuck yourself.

[electric789]

Darth, insulting the truth only makes you appear that much more stupid.

[DarthAtheos666]

Calling your retarded ideas the truth makes you look even more stupid. And again, go fuck yourself.

[electric789]

experts say those hijackers couldnt have pulled off those manoeuvres. stop playing with yourself and get educated you imbecile.----im·be·cile (mb-sl, -sl)

n.

1. A stupid or silly person; a dolt.

2. A person whose mental acumen is well below par.

3. A person of moderate to severe mental retardation having a mental age of from three to seven years

[DarthAtheos666]

I'd like you to tell me who these 'experts' are. Just because some assholes make 'loose change' doesn't mean it's true. Oh, and good job learning how to use a dictionary. When you're done snickering at the dirty words you should consider reading some books on logic and critical thinking.

[electric789]

besides any physics or aviation experts,, how about their flight instructor for one.

[electric789]

A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. Its impossible, said Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret). With doctoral degrees in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Col. Bowman served as Director of Advanced Space Programs Development under Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter.

[electric789]

Theres a 2nd group of facts having to do with the cover up, continued Col. Bowman. Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government dont want us to know what happened and whos responsible. Who gained from 9/11? Who covered up crucial information about 9/11? And who put out the patently false stories about 9/11 in the first place? ...I think the case is pretty clear that its highly placed individuals in the administration with all roads passing through Dick Cheney.

[DarthAtheos666]

It's obvious that you're convinced that the government is responsible and to hell with the evidence. I'm not going to argue with you any more because it's just pointless.

[electric789]

Actually no im not convinced of anything except the official version was a sham. People blindly accept the official version which was wrought with fallacies and ignores a ton of evidence. Thats why people want an independent investigation of the evidence. I guess its a far of a stretch for people to put it all together that theres something seriously wrong with the whole fiasco. Bin Laden, a CIA asset. WTC asbestos needed removal, owner took out terroism insurance just before. Stock puts, etc

[jstennis96]

its funny because you went through all that trouble for nothing

[ilovejapan888]

i cant believe its been 7 years now...it feels like it happend yesterday!

[hotwafflestoast]

lol this funny

[patty0100]

is there something wrong with you hotwaffletoast fucking idiot

[sponges0567]

omg unless u guys havent noticed the airplanes explode when they hit the building which means they desintegrate and u cant find any wreckage and also if you havent noticed THERES NOTHING LEFT OF THE BUILDINGS!

[QuincyDan]

Why do you big brains ignore THOUSANDS of witnesses? Why? Don't give me all the minutiae about tracking and wind sheer and controlled explosions blah blah blah. Please go back to your role playing games. If you roll the six-sided dice long enough, eventually a plane doesn't crash into the building, no matter how many people saw it.

[IRSFRAUDEXPOSED]

the tracking was off the image was too far in the middle to match the explosion. they cop it to make it look as much like the camera was folowing a plane but its fake.

[911Psycho]

i love this hahahahah

[gibberingmutant]

wanker hohohoho

[NYCBOY14]

Did they find the plane in the wreckage?

[mudchair16]

In an explosion stuff tends to get blown up.

[BunniesNPancakes13]

It tends to be a bit hard to find bits of a plane after a 1,000+ foot building falls on it.

[4ezMoney]

Where's the "nose out" of the fuselage as shown in other media footage? It's gone in this video. Must be collateral damage control.

[666nightwish666]

Don't get me wrong, but that plain looks created by a computer or something..

[KM5347]

Haha computers don't really create anything by themselves unless it is through a program. Programs are programmed by people. I doubt someone programmed a program to create the whole "plain" scenario, mainly because that would be a pain in the ass, take a very long time, the footage was released within hours, and there were countless witnesses. anyhow if it was fake. A person would have had to code the same editing that they could have done themselves in less time. I hope you arent older than me.

[chibangin007]

this was the first video i saw that day, i said to myself, damn that looks fake

[sobernuts]

then you should've fucking killed yourself on that day.

[hypnotoad25]

i agree.

[mbassi47]

hahahahahah

[BoboVicus]

WHERE DID YOUR USERNAME GO?! D=