HDD bottlenecks only apply to situations with comparatively miniscule network and software buffers. If you want to transfer 100GB over a 100Gb/s network, it'll take you 8 seconds - if you're saying in those 8 seconds you can't store all 100GB at least -somehow- (even if half of it is stored in RAM for the next few seconds) then you're obviously talking theoretically and not practically.
Completely Crazy, the bottleneck of the writeable media (hard drives) are just becoming more and more frustrating. It's all well and good sending 100Gb/s, but if you can't write the data that quick your just going to get a build up of packets and notice no difference from a 1/10Gigabit to a 1/10Terabit.
no plan for 400 Gbps?
SSBOFDM 2 weeks ago
HDD bottlenecks only apply to situations with comparatively miniscule network and software buffers. If you want to transfer 100GB over a 100Gb/s network, it'll take you 8 seconds - if you're saying in those 8 seconds you can't store all 100GB at least -somehow- (even if half of it is stored in RAM for the next few seconds) then you're obviously talking theoretically and not practically.
yoda2031 7 months ago
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!! got to explode!
gledz1000 9 months ago
Completely Crazy, the bottleneck of the writeable media (hard drives) are just becoming more and more frustrating. It's all well and good sending 100Gb/s, but if you can't write the data that quick your just going to get a build up of packets and notice no difference from a 1/10Gigabit to a 1/10Terabit.
CardShark88 1 year ago
1Tbit/s will come in 2013, and then 10Tbit/s in 2015
Gradius0 2 years ago 8
@Gradius0 Yeah all we need now is some har drive/storage device that can write in 1TB/s or more..
XxMEVANSxX 1 year ago
@XxMEVANSxX Check out the Fusion IO Octal SSD drive array it reached 1TB/s
karlsruheprotestful 7 months ago
impressive!
addelin 2 years ago 4