Added: 5 years ago
From: StanTheMovieMan
Views: 1,115
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "No one you've heard of"??Just looking for films by Justine Wadell I found this.She has been for 12 years one of the best British actresses,though she was born.S.A.

    Your review was good,well explained.The beanie was terrific.I remember it being a faze in the 1950's.

  • book>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>­>>>>>movie

  • Yes, if you want this story-- read the book! It's quite sad when poor acting and a warped plot ruin a great novel. Besides, the suspense lasts longer when you read it! Maybe someday a director will come along who can channel the book's soul into an amazing thriller, but evidently, these guys strayed from the story and screwed it up. oh well... Thanks, Stan!

  • This Movie Is Better If You Havent Read The Book. Sorry, But I Dont Agree With This Review.

  • Stan the movie man, I say to you, I do not trust your opinion worth a glass of dog Piss!

  • Glass of dog piss aside, it was still a bad movie.

  • What's with the hate for my headgear?

  • (continued from below) Frick I mean he is meant to be obscure, but ordinary, he is very complex and pure evil, but the way his mind works makes his 'ordinary' countenance 10x scarier and more evil. Bah, I can't explain it, but the movie did not get it right. I cannot imagine the book's Slater wearing a creepy mask or anything so obvious as that. anyways!! haha that is my rant.

  • okay, I havnt seen the movie but I can tell just by the trailer that the acting sucks, however, the book I would rate 9/10! it had an element of surprise and everythinng. Also, just from the clip I saw of the movie, it seemed like the movie did NOT get slaters character AT ALL. (c)

  • I've read the book, but haven't seen the movie yet...but it's hard to take seriously a guy with weird glasses and a helicopter hat, if you know what I mean...:-P

  • I'm not meant to be taken seriously. It's all just for fun.

  • WHAT THE HELL YOU TALKING ABOUT THAT MOVIE WAS AWESOME...... I want to see House too:)

  • The movie was not good.

  • I believe that but at the same time, I strongly suggest you read the book. it is very good.

  • Awesome book lacking movie ok? I really think dekkers work deserve's so much more... so who's pumped for house!?

  • Now, I am a huge fan of Ten dekkers work, in fact Thr3e is probably one of my favourite books ever, but Stan does have a point. We have to acknowledge a bad movie when we see one, even if the source material or the theme deserves more.

  • Havent seen the movie yet, but the book is great.

    I suggest you read it.

  • Read the book retard, its nothing like the movie

  • Could you clarify who the retard is. Thanks.

  • sry, just sayin' the book is 10x better than the movie

  • family friendly? this is the right stuff that ppl should see compared to the trash hollywood puts out. I definately agree with montypytho17

  • And again, I'm not anti-Christian. I was brought up in Church. I'm a born again Southern Baptist.  It just wasn't a very good movie. If we can't take a critical look at Christian media and say what's good and what's bad, then we are just sheep being led by anyone who has access to mass media. You still have to think critically about all media, including Christian media.

  • you just dont like it cuz its a christian movie based off a christian book

  • Nothing could be further from the truth. I "just dont like it" because it's not a very good movie. And remember, all of God's creatures are fallible and even with the best of intentions can make the mistakes that are obvious in the movie "Thr3e" to someone with an open mind.

  • Whatch you talkin' 'bout foo?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more