Magnet Motor drive update

[TheKaos90]

I have a "blueprint i,ve been dreaming " in my head .... all i need is 100 neodyum magnets to put together and obtain high torque/power , just wait till i get money

[cdoftx]

Forget Bedini, try Maxwell

[anandaadhar]

@cdoftx If Maxwell would be complete that is...

[cdoftx]

@anandaadhar Maxwell's equations are complete as long as you're not going near the speed of light and as long as you're dealing with things much larger than an atom. For objects going near the speed of light you need to use Einstein's electromagnetic tensor. For small objects you need to use quantum mechanics, and for fast and small objects you need to use quantum electrodynamics. The point is, give me a 3d model of whatever this guy makes and I'll tell you exactly what it's going to do.

[anandaadhar]

@cdoftx Arrogance about the sitting paradigm has never broken it. Still paradigms rise and fall....

[cdoftx]

@anandaadhar Believe me, I want to see new insights into the laws of physics as much as you do. I just haven't seen any evidence of it. I don't worship the laws of thermodynamics either. The universe had a beginning, and the 1st law says energy can't be created or destroyed. Something's weird about that. Its just that no one can seem to create energy using everyday objects.

[anandaadhar]

@cdoftx This is not about creating energy but converting energy. The source, dark energy, time energy, space energy we do not know to define properly as yet. That is what it is all about.

[gregted1]

Hi,

Great work so far.. Have you considered placing a magnet on the underside of your upper arm so that at the correct time magnets will repel each other to force the movement of the upper arm

[anandaadhar]

See my later videos. I am still trying al kinds of things in the line of what you say. But I don't load all my failed versions anymore, people get agressive about it. They don't understand what the word experiment means. It means trying until it works. At first one seems to be a fool with all the failing theories tested. But in the long run everything should have been excluded that doesn't wortk so that the winning design remains. But I'm not there yet (presently doing IPMM 9, a symmetry design)

[OfficialCharlieElla]

@anandaadhar don't forget the force of momentum should be enough to move a simple cam system to move the upper magnet at exactly the right time. all you're trying to is to gear energy.It should be possible!

[anandaadhar]

@OfficialCharlieElla Thanks for the encouragement...It is indeed the problem, a cam tends to take quite some energy, so I try also differenty with cardanian joints, magnetic connections etc. It is troublesome this force control to be managed by harmonic oscillations with inertial oscillators or pendulums. See my Finsrud study.. I keep trying until I am a master engineer in this....I am also convinced that there must be some way to accomplish this.

[brock45005]

thanks i was trying to get to sleep for hours, watching this video worked

[anandaadhar]

Maybe it will wake you up also someday.....

[rsalas2006]

que perdida de tiempo, el motor se mueve por que el individuo esta moviendo la parte de arriba del motor, es solo una transferencia de energia, si lo deja quieto el sistema se detiene. Gracias a este tipo de ignorancia la qgente que predica sobre free energy tiene tan poca credibilidad.

[anandaadhar]

Use Bable fish please to post in English:

Translation: what a waste of time, the motor moves so that the individual this moving the part of above of the motor, is only an energy transference, if it leaves the system it quiet pauses. Thanks to this type of ignorance qgente that preaches on free Energy has so little credibility.

Answer

If you mean to say that it is a waste of time to experiment, you have to learn a lot more about science.....

[rsalas2006]

Ok, but I am electronic engineer with a master's degree in engineering

[anandaadhar]

Ok master, how do nyou proceed in this field?

[wakauai7wsxedcrfvqaz]

Take a second to focus your camera....unless you've got something you're trying to hide.

[anandaadhar]

Yeah I know, I have a better camera now, as you can see in my later video's.

[donhoe01111]

When you are pushing on that tip with your finger, what is the push back like?  Can't you put a spring of the where your finger is to get some automation without the mechanical start?

[anandaadhar]

Any mechanical resistance will arrest the movement sooner.

[netlethe]

This is a great series of videos .. thanks for the inspiration .. hope you'll join us here ..

[marsL001]

klinkt als een nederlander ;)

[anandaadhar]

klopt, ben ik ook

[Br0kenMan]

Discoveries must overcome nay sayers and occasionally laws are changed. Relativity raised some eye brows, as did quatum tunneling which defies original laws. In fact try applying Ohm's law to a flouro light. Sometmes numbers crunched from the shoulders of brothers simply don't add up. Observe and respect all laws, but do not be bound by them. Science is a great security blanket to keep us safe from the unknown but always remember that man knitted that blanket, and it has holes all through it.

[anandaadhar]

I am determined to keep warm with all those holes.

[JandHfilms]

Why dont you make something useful? Instead of wasting your time and ours?

[anandaadhar]

In the end we can tell whether this all was useful or not. Not at the beginning. On top of that is in science also failureuseful, because that narrows our search.

[blessedRthemeek]

Your hand powers it, not the magnets themselves- good try though.

Any gentle push with your hand is not free-energy- you need to find a way for the magnets to make the motor do the work of your hand,

and then you need to achieve extra energy-

not just perpetual motion.

The irony is that the world doesn't need energy for enything- we have been trained to think we do, and now it's grip is on us.

GOD BLESS YOU

AND YOUR WORK!

[anandaadhar]

read the rst of the comments please, I answered this issue many times before, what the world needs we predominatly realize afterwards. isn't it/ So lets be smarter than that.

[haxate]

Dude did you even listen to what he was saying in the video? He explains that its just an experiment and that hes only up the the stage where its powered by a little push made by his hand. He also says weather a self spinning device will be achieved is uncertain. Uh and the world does need energy..energy is not just electricity..why the fuck do you think we eat food?

[blessedRthemeek]

If you need food, go out and get some.

Gather your own food for your own self.

Do not gather food for a year, but gather enough sufficient for the day.

No, you do not need energy for food- it comes freely from the earth since the beginning.

Energy dependance is a product of control of one man over another, that is all.

Energy is a cure for a problem that did not exist in the first place- just like money.

We do not need money iether- only the goodness of each other, and a fare trade.

[haxate]

Uh...I did not say you need energy to gather food. I said that food provides energy for our body, i was just making the point that energy is not only in the form of electricity. But it is beneficial for us to have electricity. Look at the outcomes such as modernization- a big thing being medical research which saves lives. Anyway back on topic: Great video anandaadhar, hope to see a new one soon :)

[Joeviocoe]

How exactly are you measuring this "reaction force" you keep talking about? How does it compare to your input force?

Why do perpetual motion people never ask this question?

[anandaadhar]

It is clearly not under control, otherwise wouldn't we do research to get hold of its secrets isn't it? I am just a thinker working from principle and conviction, experimental proof and example. For the rest I am a tinkerer, you are the one with the scentific training for it. So the question you ask yourself. It is your duty to answer where this suprising result comes from with e.g. the OC MPMM effect that has been seen or with Floyd Sweets overunity of oscillating magnets he couldn't control.

[mcorrade]

don't you review your video's before uploading them. Freaking blurry man

[anandaadhar]

Next update will be better I hope, the camera was a bit out of focu indeed.

[anandaadhar]

Joeviocoe: Theoretical prejudice leads only to the staus quo of learned helplessness. Do you know the reductions of heavyside made with the Maxwellian laws?

[Joeviocoe]

But when ever someone actually takes a meter and some real measurements other than finger testing, they always come up short.

To say your getting over-unity, you must prove that you can get more horsepower out than in. NOT JUST SPEED. We can't tell from the video how much torque your finger has or how much mass each object is. You really need to do this scientifically if your going to impress anyone with an IQ.

[anandaadhar]

That is correct, this is an experiment to prove there is indeed overunity from the reaction force of magnets and this experiment is not completed. As I said, a feedback loop is needed to alternate the magnetic forces and let the magnetic snake bite its own tail. That requires timing and careful enigineering. Do you want to help? I'm not such an engineer.

[Joeviocoe]

Yes, I am an Engineer with a Physics background. But I cannot help because it is not an engineering problem. Its a flaw in your science. Many people have built advanced bedini motors that work on the same principle and have sophisticated computer controlled timing... they still don't produce over-unity.

Why?  Because it is not about timing, its about ignoring fundamental laws of physics.

[anandaadhar]

It is not proven until it is tried, nor is it refuted by claiming laws of nature which apply to closed systems. This design is new an has not been tested for this. The hypothesis is that magnets can perform work which in an alternating construction, with an oscillation, can make a loop which catches the Radiant Reactive force, the existence of which was proven by Bedinis SSGD and Bearden's MEG. So it is an engineering problem to balance the forces of the feedback loop to alternate the polarity.

[Joeviocoe]

All of my colleagues and journals that I have read all tell me that Bedini's ultimate claim, that you can get over-unity, was disproven. Yes there is a reactive force, but this has been known for a while.

[anandaadhar]

Talking after what others say will never make any discovery. I am an explorer and you defend the status quo. So be it, that is the way we look at a paradigmatic question like dealing with this magnetic reaction force. Can it draw from the vacuum or not? I don't care myself whether it is called overunity or not. If it works for us it does exist and if not then not. What's in a word? We want it to work and thus test every possibe way. The matter is of too great an importance to ignore. Apt or not

[anandaadhar]

On top of that, Bearden's MEGI know is doubted by the sitting order of physics (see wikip.), but J. Naudin proved the concept right and demonstrated that stessing the magnetic field deliveres a replenishing of the suppressed field by an insurge from the vacuum. Thus he replicated this device and proved its overunity. Hence my actions here to do it with a magnetic loop a non-mechanical magnetic transfer to bounce the reactive force against itself and thus force to overunity by mechanical stress.

[Joeviocoe]

"Talking after what others say will never make any discovery." So why do you quote Bearden and J Naudin? And why in the world would you tell me not to trust the status quo when you get all your ideas from wikipedia.

All explorers, inventors, and pioneers in science HAVE TO stand on the shoulders of those who came before them. I choose to stand on the shoulders of Newton, Einstein, and the rest that have been proven right by today's technology.

You stand on the shoulders of incompetence.

[anandaadhar]

Wikipedia is retrospective and will never be the progress. I refer more to peswiki and other sincere associations for progress. I think itis your ow ignorance and incompetnce you are talking about. Einstein is ok, he revised the etherconcept, saying he was to radical in his denial. Heissenberg said'I think work from magnets s possble, but we science idiots can't do that, that is to an outsider' Prigogine talked of negentropy.You say: they are incompetent. Now think out of the box yourself, hero.

[Joeviocoe]

First, PESwiki is also just a bad to rely on as Wikipedia. Not because of sincerity, but because it is an open source community. I can make up something out of the blue and have it posted there. And people are free to edit. But it never gets scientifically verified.

Misinformation travels better than the truth.

[anandaadhar]

What you want to confide in with uncharted territory? You want a tourguide on an unknown planet. An that you use to justify your own absense in science. Show me YOUR positive results. Then we will continue this discussion. You dont have the benefit of the doubt because you don't do anything constructive. I am the one constructive, not you. So why should I confide in you?

[Joeviocoe]

Not asking for confidence in me. As a scientist, I ask for your scientific proof. You offer nonsense.

I have no free energy claims. So the burden of proof is on you. If it were the other way around and I made a device, I expect you and the scientific community to scrutinize my work as well.

[anandaadhar]

I am conducting an experiment for the proof of magnetic overunity. It is not concluded, so I can offer no defnite proof. It is called hypothesis, method and research.. That is necessary. That is okay. Overunity is what i look for. The proof is there when I have a selfrunner. That is not that easy, if it woud be possible. You know that. Still you insist this way. If you insist that much on direct results, then work with the design yourself. Why not cooperate, with this much energy on talking?

[Joeviocoe]

Your very right. You are in an experimental phase and have a hypothesis.

As someone who adheres to the scientific method. My research into "over-unity" never got past the hypothesis phase. Why? Because there is no proof of concept. And every other person so far has only met with failure. And those who claim success are UNVERIFIABLE. With direct experience with the conservation of energy and closed and open systems, I have concluded that the laws of physics are sound. And over-unity is flawed.

[anandaadhar]

You are wining again. Are you a sissy? There are so many people in this line of research with success in overunity. What about Finsrud? What about Correa. Do you know them?

[Joeviocoe]

Please curb the name calling. I attack your work but not your personal character. If I have, then I sincerely apologize.

[anandaadhar]

So we work with these hypothesis: 1) yes there is overunity, 2) there is no overunity to catch in a loop. The experiment must prove which one is correct. No law of nature is in danger. If it works it is an open system proving that with the reaction force of magnets one can catch energy from the vacuum. The theory says that stressed magnetic fields replenish their energy from the vacuum. Status quo says that is not the case. We will see what is right. Anyhow, science will keep standing. Okay?

[txgiorgi]

Ok, where can I buy a free energy machine?

Schizophrenia is treatable buddy.

[anandaadhar]

Right schizofrenia especially at a mondial scale, viz. culture against nature. man against his own nature. harnessing space energy will only work with poper timing according the laws of nature. Thus we have these ether-machines. We hope to buy them in 2020-2030. There are many types already patented. Science always takes about 30 years to incorporate somethinng new in its educational system and market it. A new paradigm is never born yesterday, buddy.

[Joeviocoe]

BTW, Energy obtained through Nuclear reaction such as fission or fusion is NOT considered "Over-Unity" because of Einstein's E=mc^2. Matter is considered a form of energy. Therefore energy is not created... and you still get out ONLY what you put in. NOT Over-unity!

[anandaadhar]

There is indeed no energy created in an overunity device. The energy from the vacuum is converted into a usable form. It is also called ZeroPoint energy and Radant energy. All proven and petented concepts. Check wikipedia on the Casimir force e.g. Think of open systems delivering sustainale energy.

[Joeviocoe]

Yes, I have done extensive research on ZPE. I know about what it is, where it comes from. People with perpetual motion claims often just assume the energy comes from the vacuum. All the theoretical physicist I have read up on have agreed that ZPE is NOT tapped into with magnets. The casimir effect has nothing to do with your theory. ZPE is an incredibly small force also. It is just the residual motion of particles when all movement is at rest.

[anandaadhar]

This experiment is to prove overunity from magnets alone. Bedini calls it radiant Reactive Power. A strained magnet would under certain conditions draw power from the ether around. Sprain with his magnetic rotor e.g. could prove an overunity of 6 volts with a pulse required for the solenoid to push his mill through the sticky point of only 3 volts. That result e.g. is what made me set up this trial.

[Joeviocoe]

It is good to be curious and to experiment.. i do applaud your effort... but your effort would be better spent opening a physics 101 book.

Getting 6 volts from only 3 volts by using a magnet is NOT new... it is called a step-up transformer... the catch is that you reduce the current flow and end up with an equal (usually less) power in watts.

Remember your basic electrical rules. Voltage is only a potential of force, current is needed to do work.

And "work" is what you need to measure!

[anandaadhar]

For that reason we try the mechanical way of proving that a magnetic spring is qualitatively different from a mechanical spring. Electromagnetic transmission of forces, so by magnets in interaction, makes the catch of the reactive forcepossible, not if we try with mechanical springs, i know now. The spring used at the top I have already in magnets and it works better, i'm still progressing, even without your help. That is how it works, Not testing is not having tried.

[Joeviocoe]

Conservation of energy and momentum applies to both the electromagnetic and the mechanical aspect. That is why I compared torque x rpm = HP and volts x amps = watts. You have to account for everything when doing an experiment. Just measuring RPM will give you a false positive result. You need to measure torque moments and mass if you want accuracy.

Experiments like these have been going on since before Tesla. Yes, your design is unique but your still working of the same flawed principles.

[anandaadhar]

I am not interested in torque or rpm, olts or watts. That is not my concern. That is your trouble of coil and wire, I only want to prove that the reaction force is the same as the overunity by catching it in a loop that alternates the polarity. A simple idea, and i am going to test it with this design, You may help, because you're not that certain maybe yourself, or be sceptically aloof. That is your decision. Others found in too many cases too many effects to ignore this possibility. My opinion

[Joeviocoe]

If you use words like "over-unity" or "free energy" then you must be interested in the energy inputed vs. the energy output. Since you don't use a battery, the only energy input you have is your hand moving the magnet. And the only energy output is a spinning chakra.

How does your hand transmit energy into your device? With Force measured in Newtons since your metric over there.

The output energy is measured in HP which is torque x RPM.

[anandaadhar]

Now you do these calculations for windmills and soalr cells mr physicist. We are talking about harnessing vacuum energy here, ether gas or whatever you call it. Saying that is impossible is an outdated point of vieuw. Ever seen a UFO tanking gas? Clearly they master the spacetime/vacuum warp changing places without fossile fuel. You had your time with arrogant physics doing nothing but destroying the world. Now work and study for a change instead of discouraging others with your misanthropy.

[Joeviocoe]

I cannot fit a proper response to everything that is wrong with this statement into 500 characters.

I'm not saying it is impossible to tap into ZPE. But you, nor anyone else, offers no evidence that devices like these can. From what we know of ZPE, it is a very small, minuscule amount of energy per volume of space. NOT INFINITE. Those who study it know this. But "over-unity" people over-exaggerated and falsified it to suit their needs.

If your using UFOs as proof of ZPE devices then...WOW

[anandaadhar]

Others physicists like Zysz of the Disclosure group who back engineerded crashed UFO's state that in one cm3 of space there is as much as 15 Mw of energy to harvest which is replenished from neighbouring spaces. It only seems inconsiderable, but it constitutes the expansion of the universe! What you do is constantly insult all these sincere people and good scientists. You are just lazy to justify your indolence. Mind is a bad servant of inertia.

[anandaadhar]

Sorry, the correct number is 40-50 Mw

[Joeviocoe]

Once again, do you believe everything you read in the supermarket tabloids. I would feel much better if you would have JUST ONE reputable source. Zysz? Who?

I would think a crashed UFO would be more important because of the proof of alien civilization. But of course the little green men I keep in my basement tell me that they run their ships with the power of love.

I know, sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. I apologize but I need to make a point. UFO's cannot be your argument for ZPE.

[anandaadhar]

Now if you are srry for your cynicism, then let it be, arrest your acid. I'm the psychologst. not you. I cannot give you sensory certainty unless you go and discover yourself. You just play the fearful one. Oh something might be wrong. Oh I might have to do something myself. So what do you do exept for showing your disdain. You must be positive to achieve, not negative.

[Joeviocoe]

You must be both positive and negative to achieve in science.  You must be hopeful, but you must be your own worst critic. Otherwise you will run away with fantasy.

I am not sorry for my cynicism but I will try not to be so insulting. I sometimes write with a harsher tongue than I would if spoken. Sorry.

I do play the fearful one. Because as I teach science education, it is pseudoscience and ridiculous claims that counteract my efforts to teach real science.

[anandaadhar]

Experiment is no speudoscience. Why do you think that? What did I claim but the reaction force found in this cakra? It might be called overunity if the output proves to be greater than the input in a selfrunning status. it is the holy grail of this line of investigation. That chance we have here. You focus on it and deny it. That is neurotic. Why care, I don't haunt you. I respond to you for humanity. Before the experiment is concluded, you cannot even play fearful. That is not scientific!

[Joeviocoe]

It is a fundamental flaw that science faces. When you over-state the subject of your research. Instead of calling it research into magnetic reaction forces. You called it "Free Energy Magnet". That is what caught my attention as pseudoscience. If you retract your improper use of the term "Free Energy" then I would not have a problem with it. But don't do it to appease me. Do it for scientific accuracy.

[anandaadhar]

Well that is the name for it when the experiment is concluded, and you don't talk me out of it. Period.

[Joeviocoe]

Then it can be called pseudoscience until someone PROVES it works. It rarely happens, but there have been examples in history where pseudoscience becomes mainstream. But over-unity is a tough sell because it disproves conservation of energy or overstates the energy density of ZPE.

[anandaadhar]

It does not disprove the law of conervation, because if it works the energy must come from the outside. No energy is created then, just drawn from the outside. Stop thinking of a closed system. Then you can proceed in this research. No laws are endangered.

[Joeviocoe]

Actually, I am helping. Helping you, and others, realize that this is bad science and doesn't work.

The sooner you realize the hoax, the sooner you can focus your curiosity and ambition to working alternative energy like wind, solar, and hydro. Maybe even Nuclear if you get a degree in Physics. Hydrogen is not bad either if you understand it is only an energy carrier and not a source.

[anandaadhar]

No you try to discourage people in a line of research where many effects have been found. We don't quite control these effects completely to the point of commercial production or theoretical comprehension, but your idea of its unreality and absense is totally ignorant. And thus you don't help at all. Yours is the blabla mine is the experiment. You have to be real brother, and you know it. You are the physicist and I am the psychologist. So let's do ourduties now and not switch roles any longer.

[Joeviocoe]

Yes, I know I am quite the bother. For that I do apologize. I am a skeptic and that keeps me focused and successful in all my experiments.

I do not doubt you have "many effects". I am just not impressed by a faster chakra like you are. To me, and other people who study physics, it is a simple effect that is easily explained and not impressive. And CERTAINLY not evidence of ZPE or over-unity.

[anandaadhar]

That you do not know for sure. You only believe it if we succesfully lead the force back into the machine isn't it? No you are not sure. Doubt is just the first part of the method. Proof is something different. It is not proven right, nor wrong. We are not done.

[Joeviocoe]

Then complete your work then. I ask the same for everyone who experiments in "over-unity" or perpetual motion devices.

My problem with pseudoscience is that false hope spreads before experimental results are even found. Just like the water-car, bedini's motor, etc.  There is always buzz and some media coverage and YouTube videos about some experiment that MIGHT yield free energy. But it is never a complete experiment.

Some lesser characters even ask for "Investment" money to finish the work.

[anandaadhar]

I will to my ability. And wait meanwhile for you to do or say something we can work with. You just talk. Is that physics? Is that science? Better one true genious found in a mass of make-believers and cheaters than no talent found in a castle of defense without ladies! You're shooting rabits, talk of pseudo science and money. I don't care about that. that is uselss talk. Try for God's sake instead of babble.

[Joeviocoe]

The fact that you don't talk about money is the only reason I still have some respect for you.  At least your not a scammer.

You certain are creative. But your down a rabbit-hole where reality has left you behind. What would you like me to say that will help you?

[anandaadhar]

"I have tested the device on its input and output, I wired the output to the input in a purely magnetical chain of feedback that catches the reactive force, it works, it is a selfrunner, thank you for helping me, my name is made, because I'm the first cynic of physics to be cured this way". That you should say. If you don't want, then look another way. I don't oblige you.

[Joeviocoe]

Imagine people, hand turns generator (torque x rpm = HP), generator makes electricity (volts x amps = watts), electricity turns motor shaft (torque x rpm = HP).

Simple right? The way electromagnetism works, you don't need to convert into electricity at all.

Now, hand turns magnet disk A (.04 torque x 60 rpm = 2.4 HP), electric fields interact and turns magnet disk B (.02 torque x 120 rpm = 2.4 HP)

But wow! disk B moves faster and so people get impressed like watching a magic trick.

[anandaadhar]

It is only interesting indeed if there is a magnetic circuit which emulates the electronics of coil an wire in such a way that we have a magnetic self-runner. That is not the case yet, but we meditate for it with the conviction that it is possible to catch the reactive power of magnets into a loop. Two reasons for failure: a) I'm not handy enough, b) overunity of magnets is an illusion. Maybe it is the first failure with me, but for science it is even a succes if I end up with b.

[Joeviocoe]

I think that finding another way NOT to make a light bulb is a worthwhile effort, as long as you don't try to scam people with grand claims of free energy...

like so many others who claim over-unity with bedini type devices.

[anandaadhar]

I said this is an experiment, not that I could conclude definitely that we have proven overunity.

[Joeviocoe]

Anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all. Site a paper, reviewed by the scientific community. "I've got a rock that keeps lions away... had it since I was five years old and have never been attacked yet" Test it by going to Africa and you'll be proved wrong.

There is no proof of over-unity. Only claims of proof. Anything that ever claimed to violate conservation of energy, has either been thoroughly disproven... or has never been properly tested by independent review.

[anandaadhar]

That is simply not true, please study the many research groups working on these matters at peswiki. org

[Joeviocoe]

I have researched those sites... and if your getting your scientific theories from peswiki, then you will find pseudoscience. Since it is an open community, nothing is verified by the scientific method.

[anandaadhar]

Absense of proof is no proof of absense. At the front of developments there is always uncertainty. Only when there is a breakthrough there will be confirmation and official report from the academy. Before that we are James Bonds who are denied upon failure. That is the nature of the inventing business. We're just kids playing until we figure it out. The new theory by the way exists and is called the Aether Physics model. The site is at 16pi2. com. It is accepted by the academia. Don't miss it.

[Rotitomato]

You're probably running into the same problem all of us do that the rotation goes off axis.

[anandaadhar]

The rotation going of axis makes the pulse of the stator arm. Don't fight it but use it, this pulse caught in the arm must be controlled by a magnetic oscillator which is timed in feedback by the wheel. The forces are there, but the mechanical formula is not as clear yet.

[Rotitomato]

I still think a pendulum swinging back and forth would do the job, the magnets would have to give a little bit back to the pendulum to keep it swinging.

[anandaadhar]

The difficulty is to control this pendulum, because the cakra tends to make a dynamic change dependng the setup. So please try your idea and show me.

[Rotitomato]

If you could manage to get an exact pulse of what you need, a pendulum with a weight and escapement,like a clock mechanism could give you a steady interval and a steady power, just by setting the pendulum to the proper length. Then you could connect a gearbox to your cakra to lift up another weight to run the pendulum again. I do understand that a dynamic change occurs. To my modest opinion, you should try to get a set up somehow where a repeating movement can be applied.

[KungFuBlitzKrieg]

Good stuff! Keep it up!

[youtuubbguy66]

Hi, your videos are great. This video made me think of the following.. I see the lever attached to another disc (under) ran by the mecanism used on old trains. You wouldn't need those springs anymore. You could even attach to it a tiny magnet to give a little extra push (or maybe not).

[anandaadhar]

I do' know what you mean by old trai mechnism. Show me. That extra push for the lever is a good idea, I am meditating now the gary concept of the nineteenth century to catch the back and forth movement of the stator arm going in and out of a neutral zone with a depolarizing piece of soft iron alternatively attracted and repelled by horse hoe magnets. Thus the Radiant eactive power could work mechanically is my theory. But that is Gary's invention, I don't know if that will work for me..

[youtuubbguy66]

Yes, sure. I'm just asking for that. I made a drawing with some explanations...I'm sending you a message with my infos..