@DiDolRuChagi You do realise playing at 1024x768 is completely inferior to a 24inch 1920x1080 monitor, so with such a low res you're bound to get better FPS.
@liascm Yep, I do. But I can only play with what I got. But no doubt my PC could out similar FPS if I change my display and Graphics card. Now looking into a 58** series, Lets hope prices drop!!
@DiDolRuChagi There will defintely be a noticable fps change from 1024x768 to 1920x1080. 1920x1080 is nearly double the size of your res, so if you're achieving the same fps as me with half the res, then that means you will get half my fps at 1920x1080 , so essentially, my PC is superior in almost everyway.
i have q9650@4ghz 790i ultra mobo 6 gig ddr3@1866mhz and a gtx 260 192 super-clocked but my crysis performance suck! at 2048x1536 very high 16af 4 aa i get like 10 fps what card should i get to get atleast 30fps at these settings
I have a Q9650 @ 4.2ghz and I can only run about 1920x1080 2x AA with a nice 30fps on very high. I don't think any card can run crysis so well at this current stage
for ur p5n t deluxe was it hard to find a stable OC for ur Q9650?? having a hard time on getting my Q8300 to 3.0ghz stable. planning on getting the Q9650 within the next month.
WTF, my gtx295 and i7 4.233ghz score avrage 45/46/47 fps with the same settings like yours, but your gtx295 score 60/70 fps , i think you playing with quad sli, right?
I get relatively similar Frames per second. My system is a Phenom ii x4 B55 @ 4.0GHz, 4gb RAM DDR2 1066,Non sli GTX 260 Core 216 @ 650/1453/1051.
All max settings @ 1024x768. I only have a small Dell 15" monitor.
DiDolRuChagi 1 year ago
@DiDolRuChagi You do realise playing at 1024x768 is completely inferior to a 24inch 1920x1080 monitor, so with such a low res you're bound to get better FPS.
liascm 1 year ago
@liascm Yep, I do. But I can only play with what I got. But no doubt my PC could out similar FPS if I change my display and Graphics card. Now looking into a 58** series, Lets hope prices drop!!
DiDolRuChagi 1 year ago
@DiDolRuChagi There will defintely be a noticable fps change from 1024x768 to 1920x1080. 1920x1080 is nearly double the size of your res, so if you're achieving the same fps as me with half the res, then that means you will get half my fps at 1920x1080 , so essentially, my PC is superior in almost everyway.
liascm 1 year ago
@liascm Hehe i suppose so..But Your PC is a Dual GPU PC. So Its all good. But I do love the speed :-D.
My last PC was a AMD Athlon x2 3800 @ 2.3, 4gb DDR 400, ATi 5750!
DiDolRuChagi 1 year ago
you can get the same performens with a amd phenom 2 x4 3,4Ghz
juultje2000 1 year ago
@juultje2000 Yeah sure you can mate....
liascm 1 year ago
damn nice.
i have q9650@4ghz 790i ultra mobo 6 gig ddr3@1866mhz and a gtx 260 192 super-clocked but my crysis performance suck! at 2048x1536 very high 16af 4 aa i get like 10 fps what card should i get to get atleast 30fps at these settings
ELPRESADORi 2 years ago
no need for those settings.
I have a Q9650 @ 4.2ghz and I can only run about 1920x1080 2x AA with a nice 30fps on very high. I don't think any card can run crysis so well at this current stage
liascm 2 years ago
for ur p5n t deluxe was it hard to find a stable OC for ur Q9650?? having a hard time on getting my Q8300 to 3.0ghz stable. planning on getting the Q9650 within the next month.
SniffelzZ 2 years ago
yes it was, my 3.8ghz was stable for a few hours in games and 30 minutes of rendering, now i have a p5q deluxe with my cpu was 4.185ghz stable
liascm 2 years ago
@liascm
WTF, my gtx295 and i7 4.233ghz score avrage 45/46/47 fps with the same settings like yours, but your gtx295 score 60/70 fps , i think you playing with quad sli, right?
NBAasDOGG 2 years ago
@NBAasDOGG No? Single card
liascm 2 years ago
It`s SLI two GTX295?
GanzRUS 2 years ago
A single one
liascm 2 years ago
Do you clock procesor?
GanzRUS 2 years ago
of course, quad core @ 3.8ghz and my gtx295 clocks on channel
liascm 2 years ago
@liascm
Why have written here about the inscription that is set 2xAA, but if you really 0xAA here 1:44!
GanzRUS 2 years ago
because i applied 2x aa through the nvidia control panel, look at 0:17
liascm 2 years ago
Sorry I didn't see that
Quetnitlan 2 years ago
no worries dude
liascm 2 years ago
You have show us 0 x aa on in the control But in the end
It doesn't even matter :D It was a pleasure to watch this film it was great :D 6/5
Quetnitlan 2 years ago
no dude i showed 2 x AA in control panel, go to 0:17 and look it says Antialiasing-Setting 2x
liascm 2 years ago
You show 0x aa
Quetnitlan 2 years ago
in the second test it was 0 times anti aliasing no 2 times
Quetnitlan 2 years ago
the whole thing was 2x AA, look at the beggining i showed 2x AA in the control panel
liascm 2 years ago
song / music ?
Quetnitlan 2 years ago
6/5 stars!
awesome bench results dude, im gonna try this benchmark RIGHT now =]
tarkinfish 2 years ago
very nice video. 5/5!
avril4ewa 2 years ago
nice, how did you record it cause that takes fps aswell
Stinsels 2 years ago
With my camera, then i cropped it in sony vegas so you couldn't see the border of the screen.
liascm 2 years ago
Good job
TonkatrainHONKHONK 2 years ago
Nice fps. I will upload my performance on Enthusiast later on in the day. 5/5.
dreampilot2 2 years ago
nice one lias = )
5/5 Stars only 5 Stars ;)
XtremeInstincts 2 years ago
wow you get some nice framerates, i will upload a benchmark video too with the same settings as you with my new GTX260 :)
XFilms95 2 years ago