Wow I play baseball and even I would run on that. The ball is hit to the opposite side of the stumps that Chanderpaul is running to and the fielder had to dive for the ball. The slowest runner would have made it. I say that was pewr stof sieya.
LOL @ today (2nd Test Pak vs West Indies) Azhar Ali and Mohammed Salman did the same, but A-shocker de Silva didn't change his uber-idiot decision, and Azhar Ali was out (he was in this video's Runako Morton situation.)
morton may have reached the line first but look at 0:18, when morton got angry he raised his bat and stamp his feet so his bat was in the air and his both feet was out before the wicket keeper rip off the bails so its morton who should have been out
This is a wrong decision... clearly before the bails are broke, Morton picks his bat up (leaving the crease) and then slams his bat down again, where as chanderpaul stays in his crease, therefore chanderpaul is the batter who shouldnt have been given out...
@alicraig94 No, once you get to the other end, you're fine if the other batsman left the crease at any point. So even if you try to get back, because the other guy left his crease, he will be given out.
Morton should have been out because he went out of the crease just before the stumps were broken. He smashed his bat on the pitch, but got out of the crease in the process. 0:23
I think Morton should technically be out as he leaves the crease to take out some anger and has nothing grounded behind the line, although I think it's fair that Shiv went as it was his fault.
guyz every1 got it wrong notice how wen morton thinks hes out he smacks his bat (bat lifts in air) before mccullum takes bales off so morton shuld b out
lol "benefit of the doubt must go to the angrier batsman"
Great commentary! FWIW I reckon Morton should've been out. Sure he grounded his bat first, but then left his ground just on 0:48, before the bails were dislodged.
When the bails were been removed he smacks his bat to the ground in disgust, and was walking past the line from the crease. His left foot was partially over the line when the bails were been removed by the wicketkeeper at the other end.
That was bad by Chanderpaul, it wasn't even a quick single, there was comfortably a single there, plus it's not his call, the call was loud. Justice was done in the end.
@989989 That is why the umpires got that decision wrong. Althoug Morton made it back into his crease before Chanderpaul, he subsequently left his crease before the bails were removed.
The third umpire screwed up by not watching the entire video.
From what I understand (and going by the call from the 3rd umpire) since Morton won the race to the bowler's end crease, that would mean that the batsmen crossed and that Morton completed his run through. My understanding is that this obliges the non-striker to run to the opposite end, even if Morton subsequently left the bowler's end crease.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, and please cite the law while doing so.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i remember watchin this, i was just above the player duggout i shouted at him when he walked past "shouldnt let ya boyfriend be so mean mate" he just looked at me
i think it was morton who should hv been out ... pause exactly at 6:54 or 6:55 and ull see chanderpauls bat juuuuuuuuuuuuuuuust making it ... but i would say they make it back at the same time to
the 3rd umpire watched this and he would have a lot better quality of picture to look at, so i think he made the right decision. Thats karma for Chanderpaul haha
Chanderpaul must stop playing cricket for himself and start playing for his team...he makes 100 runs(not-out) in a game while his team loses the game...What's the point?
Chanderpaul is only player who is consistent in the team for years. He does not give his wicket easily. Otherwise West Indies will be all out very cheaply.
this is true...but what is the purpose of playing in a competition when you don't want to win? He starts needing 5 runs an over and bats out the 50 overs with the required run rate increasing to 14, 15, 16 while batsmen around him keep falling...then we lose with Chanderpaul not out on 100+...MADNESS!
I understand what you're saying 6468lee, but Chanderpaul isn't that type of a player, he's not a Gilchrist of Jayasuriya, he's never going to take the attack to an opposition, particularly in a one day game. If Chanderpaul ends up making a century from his 50 overs, then that's half the job done surely, you've got one guy steadying the ship which gives those around him the license to play shots. I understand you're saying he needs to slog more, but he's not that type of player.
If Chanderpaul isn't that type of player, then how come he gets to batsman number 1? The thing is, he CAN slog, but he deliberately plays for himself (since he was dropped from captaincy...like Hooper)...People need to realize that and deal with him.
A good batsman, like Lara, always give you a chance to win, as long as he is batting...His attitude is different to Chanderpaul's.
A key factor in 'LIMITED OVER' cricket is the ability to make runs 'IN TIME'....You can end up with all your wickets in tact but still lose the game...so...run rate is more important than wickets (except if you are playing for yourself).
When an early batsman wastes balls and faces maidens...he pressures the incoming batsmen, who lose their wickets easier.
Look at Sawan, he is a match winner and unselfish cricketer...he steers the game to victory and protects the tail-enders....
from the west indies point of view they would rather lose morton than chanderpaul, chanderpaul is the far better batsman, morton should have continued walking
that doesn't matter because they were both out when the bails went off that is why they had to see who got back first. If chanderpaul didn't leave the crease it would have been morton out
As Jade said, it really wouldn't matter. I'll try to explain each situation:
If Chanderpul made it, it would mean that Morton was leaving his crease, but the keeper's end was still his. This would be exactly the same situation as if Chanderpaul didn't even leave his crease, or beat Morton by miles.
If Morton made it, it would mean that Chanderpaul should be on his way to the other end, just like in a normal run.
I'm not 100% sure about this, but I'm pretty sure.
It's really straight forward. Both players left their respective creases so the first player back behind the bowler's crease is safe, the other is out.
it looks as though mortons foot was in the crease as the keeper knocked the bails off. whos to blame? i think chanderpaul. it wouldve been tight but if he paided attention he wouldve made it. obviously he didnt trust morton's call.
I wouldn't trsut Morton-didn't he shoot someone, might even have been a member of his family? He's clearly a hot-headed selfish idiot, and besides he's a crappy excuse for a West Indian Test batsman, Wouldn't have made a WI C Team if ther had been one in the 80s.
morton got his bat in first suggesting chanderpaul was out... BUT when he lfits his bat with rage he was once again out of the crease, meaning chanderpaul was in.
dont think the umpires had a chance to realise that tho. its SO far fetched
The Umpires made a 'BIG BLUNDER'. What an ignorant piece of umpiring. Pause at 0:48. Notice that Morton flights his bat in rage and at the same time Chanderpaul is in the crease. Now at this situation, crease belonged to Chanderpaul. Only after this, the wicket-keeper dislodges the bails. This means Morton was out. What an ignorance!
TRUE DUDE! Pause at 0:47. Notice that the stumps have not yet been knocked out. Now pause at 0:48. Notice that the wicket keeper knocks the stump out very easily, right at the moment Morton flags his bat in rage, and his feet are a cetimetre away from the crease.
oi mate, from what i know, if you ground your bat in and go back out, your not out because you have already grounded your bat in the crease, they changed the rule ever since tendulkar got runout when he went into the crease then his bat got bumped out of the crease.
Yeah Chanderpaul was in first. There is a frame there that definitively proves that. Just look at when Chanderpaul's bat stops moving down and starts horizontally. In that frame, Morton's at is one frame away from being in the crease.
terible communication from a shit captain Chanderpaul u could hear morton say FUCK!!! in that video. Chanderpaul was a shit batter when he was captain. Why?
I always thought that Morton had put his bat down first, which if you freeze-frame it he does. Only its not quite over the line, and by the time he puts it over Chanderpaul's is down. I think the third umpire got it wrong, but fuck is that tight.
the good ole fashiond "getting morton to run him out tactic" time honourd and very effective:P jokes twas just funi 2 wotch, chanderpaul is a ledge n has bin incredible recntly and im english so gope i aint offended ne1
What a mess! Though not as much as missing test match via rain, as I have done today. Be thankful you don't have to see Chester-le-Street on a reguar basis.
Thats all probably a little bit harsh. It was a real 'should I, shouldn't I' sort of run. One was obviously far more attack minded than the other, but once you go you have to go, Morton couldn't have turned back. Still, it was pretty hilarious to be that close.
I am actually really really surprised at the batsmen showing no form of teamwork..both just caring for their own wicket..they seem to be lacking any kind of team bond
I was a little shocked at the reaction from Morton when he got out (well, not really out). I understand he is upset and angry at his captain, but he shouldn't have shown it in the way he did - there are a lot of bad run outs but I've never seen a reaction like this in public.
Does anyone know about the "team spirit" in the West Indies camp? Do they get along as a team?
reardonville is right, morton is out, his bat is in the air, the stumps werent broken at the non-strikers end, i got no idea what u r on about adi87tya. and no the ball is not dead wen the stumps are broken. get ur rules right
That's pretty funny really - and embarrassing. And why is everyone debating the rules? I would've thought the two umpires on the ground, plus the third (TV) umpire might have a clue about the runout rules...they got it right to me by the looks of it. Chanderpaul was the last player to recover his ground. Morton slammed his bat into the turf after the bails were dislodged. Strange, but funny... and I wonder what was said as Morton came back and Chanderpaul departed??
no but the stumps were broken at the bowler's end...so that's the one that counts...because the ball is dead once the stumps are broken, discounting overthrows...
Chnaderpaul desearved to be out for being a dick and not running properly and trusting his mate's call. I think umpire basically decided that Chanderpaul deserved it. Looks like Morton was on the line when Chanderpaul brought his bat down, but justice was done.
Just so you know, no one gives a shit about 'American Football' (the ball is barely touched by the players feet anyway) outside of America. Cricket is the #1 sport of Asia and Commonwealth-based countries.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Yeah? well i could really give a shit what everyone else thinks especially you, fuck cricket, what you fucking hit a ball like a retard and then run to a line and back??? thats pointles as all hell
All american football involves is some retard guys who are henched, one smart guy the QB and some guys who can catch a bit all it involves is throwing a ball to a line socring then going back........wanker
oh yeah all football players are dumb sure, and thats ALL you do, listen cum stain, you couldnt even handle it so dont fucking try to act like you know what its like
You mean you "couldn't" give a shit - if you could, then that means you do care. But I digress, I shall assume you meant to say that you couldn't give a shit and I would say you obviously do care because you have gone out of your way to view a cricket video and make comments regarding the matter. Get a life?
Well said bgussey, I don't know where this incorrect phrase has come from, but it seems common place in the States for people to say "I could give a shit"...no you mean I couldn't give, but then you can't expect too much from people who took the letter U out of so many words because it was confusing them. Also "pwnage" bgussey is right, if you don't care why bother looking at a cricket video, and they don't have runouts in any other sport so you were definitely searching cricket pages.
obviously, you can understand "sarcasm" because you are to busy trying to act "smart" to realize you are actually quite "stupid" if you are fed up with my "quotations" too bad because i hate "cum stains" like "YOU"
wonder if these guys ever made up?!
John3285 3 weeks ago
Wow I play baseball and even I would run on that. The ball is hit to the opposite side of the stumps that Chanderpaul is running to and the fielder had to dive for the ball. The slowest runner would have made it. I say that was pewr stof sieya.
ahtartersauce101 5 months ago
ian bell lucky!
mozmeister15 6 months ago
HE IS FUMING! GET OUT OF THE WAY HES A BIGMAN LOOOOL
cRiKeTALlThEwaaAy 6 months ago
technically, morton leaves his ground again when he slams his bat into the ground!
Alpot103 6 months ago
7:55
"YES! yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah 'uck YEAH YEAH -FUCK!- ... FUCK!"
adraim69 7 months ago 4
what would have happened if both had touched their bats down at the same time??? :D
100kierenw 8 months ago
@100kierenw surely monako ..cuz he left his crease
shehzaadful 8 months ago
LOL @ today (2nd Test Pak vs West Indies) Azhar Ali and Mohammed Salman did the same, but A-shocker de Silva didn't change his uber-idiot decision, and Azhar Ali was out (he was in this video's Runako Morton situation.)
roxor1080 8 months ago
morton may have reached the line first but look at 0:18, when morton got angry he raised his bat and stamp his feet so his bat was in the air and his both feet was out before the wicket keeper rip off the bails so its morton who should have been out
canadianchillazz 9 months ago
@canadianchillazz ya i too think dis..........this should have been noticed and morton should have been out.....
786najid 8 months ago
Press 3 repeatedly for pac-man sound effect
Matt94Rob 10 months ago
This is a wrong decision... clearly before the bails are broke, Morton picks his bat up (leaving the crease) and then slams his bat down again, where as chanderpaul stays in his crease, therefore chanderpaul is the batter who shouldnt have been given out...
alicraig94 10 months ago
@alicraig94 No, once you get to the other end, you're fine if the other batsman left the crease at any point. So even if you try to get back, because the other guy left his crease, he will be given out.
adi87tya 8 months ago
yea yea yeayeayeayea !FUCK
hurricanewinzz 11 months ago
That is just terrible. There was a single there everyday.
eddierofl 11 months ago
give them both out....bring 2 new batsman
stars1299 1 year ago
luvud wuth hus kiptin
mubd1234 1 year ago
Morton should have been out because he went out of the crease just before the stumps were broken. He smashed his bat on the pitch, but got out of the crease in the process. 0:23
pwnag3 1 year ago 2
Just proves what a selfish cricketer chanderpaul is
timmyedmundson 1 year ago
@timmyedmundson Have you got a vendetta against Chanderpaul or something???
KochoC 6 months ago
@KochoC Dunno where you got a vendetta from but it is awful running and selfish
timmyedmundson 6 months ago
2:43 id say that Morton is out as Chanperpauls bat appears to be grounded beyond the line with Morton on the line.
moggoon 1 year ago
It was an easy single, It was Chanderpaul's fault so its fair.
collinslfc 1 year ago 2
THE VIDEO ENDS AT 3 : 34 ...WHY 8 MINUTES ...LOSERRR
Kamran1khan1 1 year ago
nice nose blow
seanmcclenaughan 1 year ago 2
Very funny
stargroup29 1 year ago
I think Morton should technically be out as he leaves the crease to take out some anger and has nothing grounded behind the line, although I think it's fair that Shiv went as it was his fault.
ashliski 1 year ago
@ashliski
A Batsman cannot be given out, run out, if he has left his crease under the misapprehension that he is out.
senluijr 1 year ago
@senluijr if u know so much take up umping homeboy fo real
DAJAZDJ1 1 year ago
@ashliski INZAMAN COULD HAVE HIS OWN COMPILATION OF RUN OUTS
DAJAZDJ1 1 year ago
send both out...
laluprasad12 1 year ago
guyz every1 got it wrong notice how wen morton thinks hes out he smacks his bat (bat lifts in air) before mccullum takes bales off so morton shuld b out
djeatyou 1 year ago
lol "benefit of the doubt must go to the angrier batsman"
Great commentary! FWIW I reckon Morton should've been out. Sure he grounded his bat first, but then left his ground just on 0:48, before the bails were dislodged.
pierre45a 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
When the bails were been removed he smacks his bat to the ground in disgust, and was walking past the line from the crease. His left foot was partially over the line when the bails were been removed by the wicketkeeper at the other end.
Jezza46 2 years ago
@avsfan331940 Law 29.2
2. Which is a batsman's ground
(a) If only one batsman is within a ground
(i) it is his ground.
(ii) it remains his ground even if he is later joined there by the other batsman.
(b) If both batsmen are in the same ground and one of them subsequently leaves it, (a)(i) above applies.
michaelsgolf 2 years ago
@michaelsgolf Ah so it was a missed call, one I can overlook because I still say Shivnaraine got what he deserved.
avsfan331940 1 year ago
And now one wonders why Morton doesnt get much play these days... hmmmmm
He mashed the TIger's toe. LOL
Barit0nist 2 years ago
Or should I say... paw
Barit0nist 2 years ago
That was bad by Chanderpaul, it wasn't even a quick single, there was comfortably a single there, plus it's not his call, the call was loud. Justice was done in the end.
ashliski 2 years ago
at least in this one the guy who fucked it up and ballwatched got punished. So crap that they gave Watson out in the recent one.
TheAusChap 2 years ago
geez i wonder where watto and katich got that that from
pearcedogga 2 years ago
lol
caribbeansuntrue 2 years ago
For what it's worth, Morton ended up 70* in a washed-out match, his highest test match score.
mymentor 2 years ago
i love at 1:30 when you can hear everyone laughing in the background!
Flyin15 2 years ago
Great audio at 8mins...
kingping189 2 years ago
hahah cheers for the awsome upload!
oneparanoid 2 years ago
How funny is this? "Which bat touches first?" Hilarious!
RedHillRabbitoh 2 years ago
Does it matter that Morton was not inside the crease the moment the BAILS are removed?
Regardless, I've watched this tons of times and it makes me smile everytime.
989989 2 years ago
yeah i reckon he leaves his crease when mccullum takes the bails off
cmonphoenix9 2 years ago
@989989 That is why the umpires got that decision wrong. Althoug Morton made it back into his crease before Chanderpaul, he subsequently left his crease before the bails were removed.
The third umpire screwed up by not watching the entire video.
michaelsgolf 2 years ago
From what I understand (and going by the call from the 3rd umpire) since Morton won the race to the bowler's end crease, that would mean that the batsmen crossed and that Morton completed his run through. My understanding is that this obliges the non-striker to run to the opposite end, even if Morton subsequently left the bowler's end crease.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, and please cite the law while doing so.
avsfan331940 2 years ago
Comment removed
TASFOOTYCHANNEL 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LOL funny stuff,
Great upload
MustafaDonview07 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i remember watchin this, i was just above the player duggout i shouted at him when he walked past "shouldnt let ya boyfriend be so mean mate" he just looked at me
Hupn8r5225 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i wuda wacked the bat in chanderpauls face lol
pathaanx 2 years ago
Jesus, great stuff!! thanks for the upload.
Cotdail 2 years ago
omg omg
adsonkool 2 years ago
the funniest run out ever...even better thn the sehwag one!
dravidfan9 2 years ago 2
Best Run out ever!! LOL
saravangolla 2 years ago
lol! why didn't chanderpaul just run?? he would have made it easily. what a twat
mrccclc 2 years ago 4
cuz we were destined to watch this video lol!
99problams 2 years ago
great commentating, awesome commentating. loved ian smith.
TheGameOvais 2 years ago 34
thats pretty poor running from chanderpaul
rugved1000 2 years ago 35
Agreed, I got pissed off at him watching this hahah.
dajesmac 2 years ago 2
@rugved1000 or lack thereof
foolfromhell 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
☻/
/▌This Is Bob Copy And Paste Him So He
/ \ Can Take Over Youtube
chaudary786 2 years ago
Chanderpaul's bad...
nook3y 2 years ago
best dismissal (sp?) ever
aznclass 2 years ago
pwnage91 is a fkn idiot. y the hell u watching this eh?
SirD0nBr4dman 3 years ago
It served Chanderpaul right. He left his mate posted
IanGorton 3 years ago
haha ive never seen such a thing. btw i think chanderpaul was back first
bloodworm86 3 years ago
i think it was morton who should hv been out ... pause exactly at 6:54 or 6:55 and ull see chanderpauls bat juuuuuuuuuuuuuuuust making it ... but i would say they make it back at the same time to
karanrulesall 3 years ago
the 3rd umpire watched this and he would have a lot better quality of picture to look at, so i think he made the right decision. Thats karma for Chanderpaul haha
MadMicardo 3 years ago
Chanderpaul must stop playing cricket for himself and start playing for his team...he makes 100 runs(not-out) in a game while his team loses the game...What's the point?
6468lee 3 years ago 2
Chanderpaul is only player who is consistent in the team for years. He does not give his wicket easily. Otherwise West Indies will be all out very cheaply.
rahulsalian 3 years ago
this is true...but what is the purpose of playing in a competition when you don't want to win? He starts needing 5 runs an over and bats out the 50 overs with the required run rate increasing to 14, 15, 16 while batsmen around him keep falling...then we lose with Chanderpaul not out on 100+...MADNESS!
6468lee 3 years ago 3
I understand what you're saying 6468lee, but Chanderpaul isn't that type of a player, he's not a Gilchrist of Jayasuriya, he's never going to take the attack to an opposition, particularly in a one day game. If Chanderpaul ends up making a century from his 50 overs, then that's half the job done surely, you've got one guy steadying the ship which gives those around him the license to play shots. I understand you're saying he needs to slog more, but he's not that type of player.
vicavox 3 years ago 2
If Chanderpaul isn't that type of player, then how come he gets to batsman number 1? The thing is, he CAN slog, but he deliberately plays for himself (since he was dropped from captaincy...like Hooper)...People need to realize that and deal with him.
A good batsman, like Lara, always give you a chance to win, as long as he is batting...His attitude is different to Chanderpaul's.
6468lee 3 years ago
A key factor in 'LIMITED OVER' cricket is the ability to make runs 'IN TIME'....You can end up with all your wickets in tact but still lose the game...so...run rate is more important than wickets (except if you are playing for yourself).
When an early batsman wastes balls and faces maidens...he pressures the incoming batsmen, who lose their wickets easier.
Look at Sawan, he is a match winner and unselfish cricketer...he steers the game to victory and protects the tail-enders....
6468lee 3 years ago
"For the safety of players, I say give the benefit of the doubt to Chanderpaul."
"Look at the size of the birth between the players"
Hahahah
xratedcheese 3 years ago 2
from the west indies point of view they would rather lose morton than chanderpaul, chanderpaul is the far better batsman, morton should have continued walking
mcnardo 3 years ago
Now Ronako is badman.. he cud have done anythin to his captain then!
PhOeniXibeX 3 years ago
Has anyone got a picture of this?
Gillysbiggestfan 3 years ago
u gotta say der waz a single der
walidkhaoula 3 years ago
cor! pick that!
vladtepes97 3 years ago
chandrepaul totally messed up the run! blady fucker
chandana1997 3 years ago 2
I think the right call was made. Morton beat him back by a hair, and Chanderpaul deserved to be given anyway, with that bonehead bit of running.
avsfan331940 3 years ago
FUCK! indeed.
It's tight, but I think Morton's bat is sliding on the line before Chanderpaul's is put down.
And also Morton appears to stamp angrily into the crease just as the wicket keeper takes off the bails (around 0.24), making him in (!).
So I reckon Morton is probably safe.
LOL at all the laughing in the commentary box though.
anomonimus 3 years ago 3
well.. isnt morton out of crease when the bails are off?
its not very clear from the video but strange that none of the commentators bothered to have a look at their positions when the bails were off!
nileshhiray 3 years ago 2
that doesn't matter because they were both out when the bails went off that is why they had to see who got back first. If chanderpaul didn't leave the crease it would have been morton out
jade2686 3 years ago
As Jade said, it really wouldn't matter. I'll try to explain each situation:
If Chanderpul made it, it would mean that Morton was leaving his crease, but the keeper's end was still his. This would be exactly the same situation as if Chanderpaul didn't even leave his crease, or beat Morton by miles.
If Morton made it, it would mean that Chanderpaul should be on his way to the other end, just like in a normal run.
I'm not 100% sure about this, but I'm pretty sure.
guy0307 3 years ago
It's really straight forward. Both players left their respective creases so the first player back behind the bowler's crease is safe, the other is out.
enzown 3 years ago
i like chanderpaul as a player and a skipper but...dat was his mistake...he shud have been lookin @ morton..it waz his call...
SGbatsrule 4 years ago
they were in a comfortable position of 189/3... poor decision by morton and poor decision by chanderpaul not to follow with the single
makemytime 4 years ago
easy single there!
HeadDominion 4 years ago
it looks as though mortons foot was in the crease as the keeper knocked the bails off. whos to blame? i think chanderpaul. it wouldve been tight but if he paided attention he wouldve made it. obviously he didnt trust morton's call.
carapalis 4 years ago
I wouldn't trsut Morton-didn't he shoot someone, might even have been a member of his family? He's clearly a hot-headed selfish idiot, and besides he's a crappy excuse for a West Indian Test batsman, Wouldn't have made a WI C Team if ther had been one in the 80s.
doctorgsja 4 years ago
yeah i think ur right.
morton got his bat in first suggesting chanderpaul was out... BUT when he lfits his bat with rage he was once again out of the crease, meaning chanderpaul was in.
dont think the umpires had a chance to realise that tho. its SO far fetched
dush64 4 years ago
Solid video!!!
Thanks mate!
Morton was proper out but gotta feel for him too
rohitmkiller 4 years ago
The Umpires made a 'BIG BLUNDER'. What an ignorant piece of umpiring. Pause at 0:48. Notice that Morton flights his bat in rage and at the same time Chanderpaul is in the crease. Now at this situation, crease belonged to Chanderpaul. Only after this, the wicket-keeper dislodges the bails. This means Morton was out. What an ignorance!
specialgenius10 4 years ago
TRUE DUDE! Pause at 0:47. Notice that the stumps have not yet been knocked out. Now pause at 0:48. Notice that the wicket keeper knocks the stump out very easily, right at the moment Morton flags his bat in rage, and his feet are a cetimetre away from the crease.
Salman6Butt 4 years ago
oi mate, from what i know, if you ground your bat in and go back out, your not out because you have already grounded your bat in the crease, they changed the rule ever since tendulkar got runout when he went into the crease then his bat got bumped out of the crease.
aiwmiwdiw 4 years ago
the moment you leave the crease and if the other batsman is inside it he gets the crease and you lose the ground.
please refer to law 29 2 for more details on this.
also read the runout law 38
(alls available on lords . org)
nilesh926 3 years ago
No!
Chanderpaul is out!
FINAL CALL - CHANDERPAUL IS OUT
guy0307 4 years ago
upload-il com file/65054/cricket.bmp.html
add a dot and then slash
guy0307 4 years ago
Oh man!
you are right! pause on 2:42
guy0307 4 years ago
Yeah Chanderpaul was in first. There is a frame there that definitively proves that. Just look at when Chanderpaul's bat stops moving down and starts horizontally. In that frame, Morton's at is one frame away from being in the crease.
Rieuk 4 years ago
No the bat was in the air!
guy0307 4 years ago
terible communication from a shit captain Chanderpaul u could hear morton say FUCK!!! in that video. Chanderpaul was a shit batter when he was captain. Why?
lawro04 4 years ago
2:43 Chanderpaul's bat in the air Morton just got the crease.
guy0307 4 years ago
does anyone remember cricket max if someone has a vid of it plz post
LEEDS007CENAHBK 4 years ago
I always thought that Morton had put his bat down first, which if you freeze-frame it he does. Only its not quite over the line, and by the time he puts it over Chanderpaul's is down. I think the third umpire got it wrong, but fuck is that tight.
Squidlover1000 4 years ago
well chanderpaul deserved to go anyway
BmxGuitar505 4 years ago
it was chanderpauls fault!!!
John3285 4 years ago
lol!
bathrugby13 4 years ago
haha pick that pick that lol
smken30 4 years ago
It worked with Lara, so who knows? :D
lerpwlambyth 4 years ago
why didnt england employ this tactic on chanderpaul....
olibrown1234567890 4 years ago
What tactic would that be?
davejc67 4 years ago
the good ole fashiond "getting morton to run him out tactic" time honourd and very effective:P jokes twas just funi 2 wotch, chanderpaul is a ledge n has bin incredible recntly and im english so gope i aint offended ne1
olibrown1234567890 4 years ago
Comment removed
reuel2020 4 years ago
Comment removed
reuel2020 4 years ago
Comment removed
reuel2020 4 years ago
sorry, but thats brilliant. bizarre but brilliant for cricket.
Legenddc 4 years ago
it is shit
Legenddc 4 years ago
What would have happened if the bails had been taken off before either batsman grounded their bat? Discuss.
nevinrobinson 4 years ago
in that case the one further away from the danger end would have survived.
hussaingm 4 years ago
What a mess! Though not as much as missing test match via rain, as I have done today. Be thankful you don't have to see Chester-le-Street on a reguar basis.
nevinrobinson 4 years ago
Chanderpaul wake up mate that was an easy single Morton was screaming and screaming jee wizz
larry69champ 4 years ago
Commentator is a legend
huggd45 4 years ago
lol vettori is a crap fielder
lcfcfan16 4 years ago
even i wouldn't do that and i'm rubbish btween the wickets (im a boundry man)
edz5426 4 years ago
it's morton's call. should have run
callyourselforiginal 4 years ago
wtf???
bluecrossbow 4 years ago
windies are crap
LeamingtonSteve 4 years ago
says who?
platinum365 4 years ago
"we've got three batsmen out there" hahaha
englishtamil1 4 years ago
Thats all probably a little bit harsh. It was a real 'should I, shouldn't I' sort of run. One was obviously far more attack minded than the other, but once you go you have to go, Morton couldn't have turned back. Still, it was pretty hilarious to be that close.
Squidlover1000 4 years ago
BRILLIANT use of the F-Bomb by Morton there. Chanderpaul got what he deserved.
massivechicken 4 years ago
what happened and who's fault was it???
John3285 4 years ago
LOL CRAZY
yuk101 4 years ago
I am actually really really surprised at the batsmen showing no form of teamwork..both just caring for their own wicket..they seem to be lacking any kind of team bond
gg162803 4 years ago
the RO was chanderpaul's fault. he is suppose to say NO. no wonder why morton was mad.
desipimp299 4 years ago
yeh yeh yeh yeh yeh FUCK!
aznmarfia 5 years ago
I was a little shocked at the reaction from Morton when he got out (well, not really out). I understand he is upset and angry at his captain, but he shouldn't have shown it in the way he did - there are a lot of bad run outs but I've never seen a reaction like this in public.
Does anyone know about the "team spirit" in the West Indies camp? Do they get along as a team?
papuan7orchid 5 years ago
theres no team spirit obviously because their all from different countries and they might be prejudiced against each other
roxorzursoxorz 4 years ago
no they only care about getting paid
adriana71432 4 years ago
geez thats sad hahaha
welemani 5 years ago
hus the commentator
aznclass 5 years ago
Great clip. Good decision by the 3rd umpire IMO.
markg70 5 years ago
reardonville is right, morton is out, his bat is in the air, the stumps werent broken at the non-strikers end, i got no idea what u r on about adi87tya. and no the ball is not dead wen the stumps are broken. get ur rules right
moffo47 5 years ago
That's pretty funny really - and embarrassing. And why is everyone debating the rules? I would've thought the two umpires on the ground, plus the third (TV) umpire might have a clue about the runout rules...they got it right to me by the looks of it. Chanderpaul was the last player to recover his ground. Morton slammed his bat into the turf after the bails were dislodged. Strange, but funny... and I wonder what was said as Morton came back and Chanderpaul departed??
broomballcory 5 years ago
no but the stumps were broken at the bowler's end...so that's the one that counts...because the ball is dead once the stumps are broken, discounting overthrows...
adi87tya 5 years ago
well, when the keeper finally takes the bails off, mortons was wacking the bat into the ground, as his bat was in the air at the time,
reardonville 5 years ago
chanderpaul to blame all the way and who close what that lol.
englandwc06 5 years ago
mate bondy would have got them both out a few overs later
reardonville 5 years ago
what the hell
deepak1234 5 years ago
Chnaderpaul desearved to be out for being a dick and not running properly and trusting his mate's call. I think umpire basically decided that Chanderpaul deserved it. Looks like Morton was on the line when Chanderpaul brought his bat down, but justice was done.
eyesonthetube 5 years ago
football n rugby is shit...da only american sport that is kinda fun is basketball...
Siduu101 5 years ago
i agree, basketball is probably only fun sport to play and watch in my opinion
dirs43 5 years ago
wtf? who the fuck plays cricket?! american football and rugby all the way
pwnage91 5 years ago
dude...move the rock you been under!
premster1 5 years ago
whats the fuck is the point of the game any ways??? i mean shit i was confused as hell when i saw the fucking video
pwnage91 5 years ago
ur mama with my father
shakur2 5 years ago
i play cricket u fucker
hamrules 5 years ago
I'll have you know that I derive a lot of pleasure from cricket and my googlies are a delight to behold.
LeamingtonSteve 4 years ago
Just so you know, no one gives a shit about 'American Football' (the ball is barely touched by the players feet anyway) outside of America. Cricket is the #1 sport of Asia and Commonwealth-based countries.
OriginalDaVe 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah? well i could really give a shit what everyone else thinks especially you, fuck cricket, what you fucking hit a ball like a retard and then run to a line and back??? thats pointles as all hell
pwnage91 3 years ago
All american football involves is some retard guys who are henched, one smart guy the QB and some guys who can catch a bit all it involves is throwing a ball to a line socring then going back........wanker
joellovesleeds 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
oh yeah all football players are dumb sure, and thats ALL you do, listen cum stain, you couldnt even handle it so dont fucking try to act like you know what its like
pwnage91 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck you bitch.. both sports are great.. football is much more entertaining than test cricket.. t20 and football .. is more like apples and oranges.
cheenamalai 2 years ago
You mean you "couldn't" give a shit - if you could, then that means you do care. But I digress, I shall assume you meant to say that you couldn't give a shit and I would say you obviously do care because you have gone out of your way to view a cricket video and make comments regarding the matter. Get a life?
bgussey 3 years ago 4
Well said bgussey, I don't know where this incorrect phrase has come from, but it seems common place in the States for people to say "I could give a shit"...no you mean I couldn't give, but then you can't expect too much from people who took the letter U out of so many words because it was confusing them. Also "pwnage" bgussey is right, if you don't care why bother looking at a cricket video, and they don't have runouts in any other sport so you were definitely searching cricket pages.
vicavox 3 years ago 2
obviously, you can understand "sarcasm" because you are to busy trying to act "smart" to realize you are actually quite "stupid" if you are fed up with my "quotations" too bad because i hate "cum stains" like "YOU"
pwnage91 3 years ago
I don't get how you Americans use "could give a damn" instead of couldn't. That's completely going against the point.
bandwicker 2 years ago 4
am i seriously still getting shit for this? for christs sake, fuck off already god...
pwnage91 2 years ago
haha i love west indies.lol
Trinisatan87 5 years ago
lol, that wuz crazy. Chanderpaul deserved it. Morton had that run
wajahatkhan 5 years ago
HAHA CHanderpaul is an idiot for not running a clear single .. BWAHAHAHHAHA deserved to get out.. jackass
pubuman 5 years ago