Glad I found this video. My dumb mean teacher would not give the name to students who missed it. She did not notify us and its not on the syllabus either. Found so much stuff online about it :)
Yes 87valeria87 you are correct, i'm an A level psychology teacher and i use this video to teach my class about the strange situation! Sorry Ygborgo, securely attached infants do show distress on the caregiver leaving, which shows that the attachment has been formed. If they didnt get upset on their caregiver leaving then they wouldn't be securely attached.
developmental psychologist here. and yes, the child is securely attached. Ygborgo, how can the child feel safe to explore the environment from her secure base when her secure base has left the room?
87valeria87 thats wrong if the baby had a secure attachment it would feel comfortable going out and experimenting in the world on its own, as it has a secure base to return to.
Mary Ainsworth did this to test stranger anxiety and seperation anxiety. She based this on a Theory by John Bowlby, this was, that there r 4 different types of children.
Secure attachment, insecure avoidant, insecure resistant and insecure disorganised. The insecure avoidant would give no responce 2 departure nd avoid contact, the insecure resistant would seek and reject contact wth conflicting desires, however the Secure attachment not get upset on departure, would be able to play wth toys as it feels safe and would be easily comforted by Caregiver. This was an experiment for the theory .
Don't talk about something you don't know noting about you dumb ass. And i couldn't tell everything about this cause of the limited amount of characters.
According to Ainsworth, it is normal for a child to be upset after separation, as this child was. In fact if the baby not been upset, that would show signs of ambivalence which is not a secure attachment. The child experiences distress but then is easily consoled and beings to experiment again. I do know what I am talking about, no need to be immature.
@ygborgo Correction: Don't talk about something you (no don't) know notHing* about,(that's a comma) you dumb ass. And I* couldn't tell everything about this, (yet another comma) because* of the limited amount of characters.
There.. now you can at least be grammatically correct when making a fool of your self.
Technically the only quality of attachment worth worrying about is if the child was disorganized. However it is a good thing that this child's secure base is her mother
do you have any videos of ambivalent attachment?
omgshift111 8 months ago
very strong secure attachment...
graziek 1 year ago
give the whole video; that would be of more help
darkcanuck 2 years ago
Stranger anxiety.
perdedoronline 2 years ago
Thanks so much for posting. This is amazingly useful!
TheNatJBrooks 2 years ago
Glad I found this video. My dumb mean teacher would not give the name to students who missed it. She did not notify us and its not on the syllabus either. Found so much stuff online about it :)
Hosai0123 2 years ago
Comment removed
GoldeWC 2 years ago
Comment removed
87valeria87 2 years ago
Comment removed
mmwells1 2 years ago
Yes 87valeria87 you are correct, i'm an A level psychology teacher and i use this video to teach my class about the strange situation! Sorry Ygborgo, securely attached infants do show distress on the caregiver leaving, which shows that the attachment has been formed. If they didnt get upset on their caregiver leaving then they wouldn't be securely attached.
eskarina54 2 years ago 7
developmental psychologist here. and yes, the child is securely attached. Ygborgo, how can the child feel safe to explore the environment from her secure base when her secure base has left the room?
terrible spelling and name-calling does not help!
dominogirl 2 years ago
...(and Lisa does that)
-re-activation of the exploration system in presence of the mother.
You can't say that she should be conforable going out on her own...she's at most 12/13 months....she wouldn't be able to!
So...I'm reporting what you said before:
"Don't talk about something you don't know noting about you dumb ass"
87valeria87 3 years ago 4
Sorry Ygborgo but I have to contradict you. I'm graduating in psychology so I know what I'm talking about!
Secure attachment is characterised by:
-a good explporation of the setting and a good interaction with the toys when the mother is with the baby (and Lisa does that)
-sadness and"despair" when the mother leaves the baby alone or with a stranger activating the attachment system (and Lisa does)
-happyness and ease of consolation on the part of the mother when she goes back in the room...
87valeria87 3 years ago 3
Comment removed
detbenson 3 years ago
87valeria87 thats wrong if the baby had a secure attachment it would feel comfortable going out and experimenting in the world on its own, as it has a secure base to return to.
ygborgo 3 years ago
Do you have any research to back this up? Tests? Studies? Video footage, anything? Didn't think so.
detbenson 3 years ago 2
Mary Ainsworth did this to test stranger anxiety and seperation anxiety. She based this on a Theory by John Bowlby, this was, that there r 4 different types of children.
ygborgo 3 years ago
Secure attachment, insecure avoidant, insecure resistant and insecure disorganised. The insecure avoidant would give no responce 2 departure nd avoid contact, the insecure resistant would seek and reject contact wth conflicting desires, however the Secure attachment not get upset on departure, would be able to play wth toys as it feels safe and would be easily comforted by Caregiver. This was an experiment for the theory .
ygborgo 3 years ago
Don't talk about something you don't know noting about you dumb ass. And i couldn't tell everything about this cause of the limited amount of characters.
ygborgo 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
According to Ainsworth, it is normal for a child to be upset after separation, as this child was. In fact if the baby not been upset, that would show signs of ambivalence which is not a secure attachment. The child experiences distress but then is easily consoled and beings to experiment again. I do know what I am talking about, no need to be immature.
detbenson 3 years ago 5
@ygborgo Correction: Don't talk about something you (no don't) know notHing* about,(that's a comma) you dumb ass. And I* couldn't tell everything about this, (yet another comma) because* of the limited amount of characters.
There.. now you can at least be grammatically correct when making a fool of your self.
TTUdoll 2 months ago
ethical issues! poor lisa :(
EncoreForRock 3 years ago
Technically the only quality of attachment worth worrying about is if the child was disorganized. However it is a good thing that this child's secure base is her mother
Brunvand 3 years ago
The baby has got a safe attachment.Good for her future :)
87valeria87 3 years ago